Differential Livelihood Adaptation to Socio-Ecological Change in Coastal Bangladesh

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Differential Livelihood Adaptation to Socio-Ecological Change in Coastal Bangladesh Differential livelihood adaptation to socio-ecological change in coastal Bangladesh Sonia Ferdous Hoque Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Leeds Sustainability Research Institute (SRI) School of Earth and Environment September, 2016 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is her own, except where work which has formed part of jointly-authored publications has been included. The contribution of the candidate and the other authors to this work has been explicitly indicated below. The candidate confirms that appropriate credit has been given within the thesis where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. The right of Sonia Ferdous Hoque to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by her in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. © 2016 The University of Leeds and Sonia Ferdous Hoque Parts of this thesis are in the process of being published in international journals Chapter 5 and parts of Chapter 6 are in the paper under review as: Hoque, S.F., C.H. Quinn, and S. Sallu. 2016. Resilience, political ecology and well-being – An interdisciplinary approach to understanding socio-ecological change in coastal Bangladesh. Ecology and Society. Chapter 7 and parts of Chapter 6 are in the paper under review as: Hoque, S.F., C.H. Quinn, and S. Sallu. 2016. Differential livelihood adaptation to socio- ecological change in coastal Bangladesh. Regional Environmental Change. These papers are based on the findings of this PhD research. As the first author, I designed the research, collected the data, analysed it and wrote the manuscript on my own. The co- authors are my PhD supervisors, who revised and provided feedback on earlier drafts of the papers. ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank the University of Leeds for awarding me the prestigious Leeds International Research Scholarship (LIRS) that sponsored the full-tuition fees and stipend for my 3-years full-time doctoral studies and the School of Earth and Environment for providing the Sustainable Research Institute (SRI) bursary that supported my fieldwork expenses. Moreover, the Research and Training Support Grant (RTSG) enabled me to attend two conferences, where I could share my research findings. This PhD has been made possible by the constant guidance and support of my two supervisors, Dr. Claire Quinn and Dr. Susannah Sallu. Claire has been my primary and only supervisor during the first two years of my study, when I designed my research proposal and conducted my fieldwork. Although Susie joined in the third year, she has given very important inputs in developing my results chapters and writing papers for publications. Their timely feedback and constant encouragement helped me keep up my morale throughout the journey. I’m extremely grateful to the two local key persons, F.M. Parvez and Saifullah Shohag, in the two study sites for providing contextual information about the sites, helping me in recruiting respondents for the field exercises and supporting me in doing the households surveys. My childhood friend, Sadequa, arranged excellent accommodation facilities at her village home (Mithakhali) and helped me network with some knowledgeable people in the village. I would like to thank my college friend, Afzal Hossain, and colleagues, G.M. Parvez and Tushar, for serving as my research assistants and taking notes during group exercises. I’m immensely grateful to the hundreds of respondents who have taken their time to answer the household questionnaires and participate in the livelihood trajectory interviews. My husband, Ishtiaque Shams, has been a tremendous emotional support for me throughout this journey. Although he himself was studying at the University of Manchester, he willingly lived in Leeds with me to make my studies easier. He has been the only one to listen to me during endless moments of frustration. I would also like to mention my elder sister Samia Hoque, who encouraged me to come to UK in the first place. Last but not the least, I’m extremely grateful to my parents for giving me the best possible education and upbringing, that helped me become the person I’m today. My deepest gratitude goes to my mother, Dr. Shamim Ferdous, for going against the cultural norm at that time and educating me in an English medium school, for which I never had to face any language barriers in my tertiary education. iii Abstract Socio-ecological changes, brought about by the rapid growth of the aquaculture industry and the increased occurrence of climatic shocks and stresses, have significantly affected the livelihood dynamics of coastal communities in Asia. Empirical studies, to date, have largely provided a snapshot of the impacts and responses to a particular disturbance at a single spatial scale at a given time, often assessing the characteristics that make certain populations more vulnerable than others. To ensure equitable and environmentally sustainable livelihoods in the future, it is essential to unpack the complex social and ecological dynamics that drive long-term changes in a system’s configurations and shape the adaptive capacities of actors within the system. This study, therefore, explores the drivers, differential livelihood adaptations and well-being outcomes of socio-ecological change in coastal Bangladesh, using poverty as central lens for differentiation. The study takes a socio- ecological systems approach, whereby insights from vulnerability, resilience, political ecology, livelihoods, adaptation, poverty and human well-being are integrated into an interdisciplinary conceptual framework. A mixed methods approach was used to collect empirical evidence from two communities, both of which underwent transformations in farming systems when maintenance of the status quo through incremental adaptation was no longer feasible. Findings show that in the absence of good governance, social power resulting from high wealth status and associated political ties can steer the direction of socio-ecological change to one that is desirable for a small group of powerful stakeholders and completely undesirable for others. Differences in wealth status lead to differences in adaptive capacity; however, changes in vulnerability contexts brought about by power dynamics further exacerbate these inequalities. While resource constraints can restrict a household’s livelihood adaptation options, its adaptation space can also become narrower through negative externalities arising from the activities of other households. This can push some households towards downward trajectories, locking them in a poverty trap. In contrast, good governance and wider participation in decision making, can shift the farming system to one that is desirable for the majority of stakeholders. The study emphasises that resilience building through transformational adaptation should account for the heterogeneous values, interests and needs of different households. This can translate into more equitable adaptive capacities and prevent the system from embarking on a maladaptive trajectory in the future. iv Table of Contents Acknowledgements iii Abstract iv List of Tables x List of Figures xi Abbreviations xiii Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Research background 1 1.2 Contextual background 3 1.2.1 Climatic shocks and stresses in Bangladesh 3 1.2.2 Shrimp and prawn aquaculture in Bangladesh 5 1.3 Aims and objectives 6 1.4 Thesis structure 7 Chapter 2. An interdisciplinary approach to exploring socio-ecological change 11 2.1 Introduction 11 2.2 Vulnerability 11 2.2.1 Conceptualisation of vulnerability 11 2.2.2 Assessment of vulnerability 13 2.2.3 Research gaps 14 2.3 Resilience 14 2.3.1 Conceptualisation of socio-ecological resilience 14 2.3.2 Adaptive renewal cycle 16 2.3.3 Linking vulnerability and resilience 17 2.3.4 Critique of resilience thinking and research gaps 19 2.4 Political ecology 20 2.5 Livelihoods 23 2.5.1 Conceptualisation of livelihoods 23 2.5.2 Critique of sustainable rural livelihoods 25 2.5.3 Linking livelihoods and poverty 26 2.6 Adaptation 28 2.6.1 Conceptualisation of adaptation 28 v 2.6.2 Adaptation opportunities, barriers and limits 31 2.6.3 Research gaps 34 2.7 Poverty 34 2.7.1 Conceptualisation of poverty 34 2.7.2 Assessment of poverty 37 2.7.3 Methodological issues in multi-dimensional poverty assessment 39 2.8 Human well-being 40 2.8.1 Conceptualisation of well-being 40 2.8.2 Assessment of well-being 42 2.9 Conceptual framework 43 2.10 Conclusion 45 Chapter 3. Research methods and study sites 46 3.1 Introduction 46 3.2 Methodological approach 46 3.2.1 Ontological and epistemological stance 46 3.2.2 Case study approach 47 3.3 The case study 48 3.3.1 Bangladesh 50 3.3.2 South-western coastal region 51 3.3.3 Study sites 56 3.4 Mixed methods research 58 3.4.1 Focus group discussions 61 3.4.2 Participatory wealth ranking 61 3.4.3 Household questionnaire surveys 63 3.4.4 Livelihood trajectory interviews 65 3.5 Data analysis 67 3.5.1 Qualitative data 67 3.5.2 Quantitative data 68 3.6 Research reflections 68 3.6.1 Field work 68 3.6.2 Positionality 69 3.6.3 Ethical considerations 70 3.7 Conclusion 70 vi Chapter 4. Disaggregating households by poverty levels and comparing methods of multi-dimensional poverty assessment 72 4.1 Introduction 73 4.2 Methods 77 4.2.1 Participatory wealth ranking (PWR) 77 4.2.2 Fuzzy set analysis (FSA) 77 4.2.3 Principal component analysis (PCA) 82 4.3 Results 85 4.3.1 Participatory Wealth Ranking (PWR) 85 4.3.2 Fuzzy set analysis (FSA) 87 4.3.3 Principal Component Analysis (PCA) 89 4.4 Discussion 92 4.4.1 Methodological strengths and limitations 92 4.4.2 Comparison of asset ownership by wealth class 100 4.5 Conclusion 104 Chapter 5.
Recommended publications
  • 01 Bagerhat Zila Total 1476090 1.7 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.7 0.2 0.1 01 1
    Table C-09: Percentage Distribution of Population by Type of disability, Residence and Community Administrative Unit Type of disability (%) UN / MZ / Total ZL UZ Vill RMO Residence WA MH Population Community All Speech Vision Hearing Physical Mental Autism 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 01 Bagerhat Zila Total 1476090 1.7 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.7 0.2 0.1 01 1 Bagerhat Zila 1280759 1.8 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.8 0.2 0.1 01 2 Bagerhat Zila 110651 1.4 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.1 01 3 Bagerhat Zila 84680 1.7 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.7 0.2 0.1 01 08 Bagerhat Sadar Upazila Total 266389 1.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.6 0.2 0.1 01 08 1 Bagerhat Sadar Upazila 217316 1.5 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.7 0.2 0.1 01 08 2 Bagerhat Sadar Upazila 49073 0.9 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.1 01 08 Bagerhat Paurashava 49073 0.9 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.1 01 08 01 Ward No-01 Total 5339 1.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.0 01 08 02 Ward No-02 Total 5406 0.8 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 01 08 03 Ward No-03 Total 7688 1.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.1 01 08 04 Ward No-04 Total 4530 1.3 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.3 0.2 01 08 05 Ward No-05 Total 4297 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 01 08 06 Ward No-06 Total 3869 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.3 01 08 07 Ward No-07 Total 5210 0.9 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 01 08 08 Ward No-08 Total 7394 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 01 08 09 Ward No-09 Total 5340 1.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.1 01 08 17 Barai Para Union Total 25610 1.9 0.2 0.2 0.2 1.0 0.2 0.1 01 08 25 Bemarta Union Total 24595 1.5 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.6 0.3 0.1 01 08 34 Bishnupur Union Total 21593 1.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.2 0.0 01 08 35 Dema Union Total 15777 1.5 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.7 0.2 0.1 01 08 51 Gota Para
    [Show full text]
  • PROFILE of MITHAKALI UNION Upazila: Mongla District: Bagerhat
    P a g e | 1 PROFILE Of MITHAKALI UNION Temporary UP Office Upazila: Mongla District: Bagerhat November 2014 P a g e | 2 Table of Content Sl # Content Page # 1. Union Map 03 2. Background, Socio-economic conditions , Disaster Vulnerabilities 04 3. Socio-economic condition 04 4. Geography 04 5. Disaster/ Vulnérabilités 04 6. Hard-to-Reach Areas. 05 7. Population in general 05 8. Child Population 06 9. Snapshot of situation of children and women in the union 06 10. Health and Nutrition 07 11. Situation of Birth Registration, Disability and Child Marriage 08 12. Child Labour 08 13. Education: Pre Primary, Primary and Secondary level 08 14. Water and Sanitation 09 15. Service by NGOs 10 16. Union Parishad Functional Status 10 17. Table 1.1: Ward wise Sex disaggregated population data 12 18. Table 1.2: Age specific child population 13 19. Table 2.1: Ward wise number of Children fully immunized or left out 14 20. Table 2.2: Ward wise number of pregnant women with status of IFA intake 15 21. Table 2.3: Infrastructure and facilities/ Health & FP 16 22. Table 2.4 and 2.5: HR status of Health and FP 16 23. Table 3.1: Situation of birth registration child labour, disability 17 24. Table 4.1: Pre-primary Education coverage 18 25. Table 4.2: Primary Education coverage 19 26. Table 4.3: Secondary education coverage 20 27. Table 4.4: Infrastructure and facilities of Educational institution 20 28. Table 4.5: HR status of Institution 21 29. Table 5.1: Source of safe water and water Coverage 21 30.
    [Show full text]
  • জেলা পরিসংখ্যান ২০১১ District Statistics 2011 Bagerhat
    জেলা পরিসংখ্যান ২০১১ District Statistics 2011 Bagerhat December 2013 BANGLADESH BUREAU OF STATISTICS (BBS) STATISTICS AND INFORMATICS DIVISION (SID) MINISTRY OF PLANNING GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF BANGLADESH District Statistics 2011 Bagerhat District District Statistics 2011 Published in December, 2013 Published by : Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS) Printed at : Reproduction, Documentation and Publication (RDP) Section, FA & MIS, BBS Cover Design: Chitta Ranjon Ghosh, RDP, BBS ISBN: For further information, please contract: Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS) Statistics and Informatics Division (SID) Ministry of Planning Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh Parishankhan Bhaban E-27/A, Agargaon, Dhaka-1207. www.bbs.gov.bd COMPLIMENTARY This book or any portion thereof cannot be copied, microfilmed or reproduced for any commercial purpose. Data therein can, however, be used and published with acknowledgement of the sources. ii District Statistics 2011 Bagerhat District Foreword I am delighted to learn that Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS) has successfully completed the ‘District Statistics 2011’ under Medium-Term Budget Framework (MTBF). The initiative of publishing ‘District Statistics 2011’ has been undertaken considering the importance of district and upazila level data in the process of determining policy, strategy and decision-making. The basic aim of the activity is to publish the various priority statistical information and data relating to all the districts of Bangladesh. The data are collected from various upazilas belonging to a particular district. The Government has been preparing and implementing various short, medium and long term plans and programs of development in all sectors of the country in order to realize the goals of Vision 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Livelihood Strategies Across Socio-Economic Groups in Changing Farming Systems: Insights from Salinity Prone South-Western Coastal Bangladesh
    Paper submitted for ICARUS – IV: Theme 2 – Climate and livelihoods of the poor May 7 – 9, 2015, University of Illinois, USA Livelihood strategies across socio-economic groups in changing farming systems: Insights from salinity prone south-western coastal Bangladesh Sonia Ferdous Hoque, PhD Candidate, [email protected] Claire Quinn, Associate Professor, [email protected] Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, UK Date of submission: 10 April, 2015 Abstract In south-western Bangladesh, the combined effects of climatic shocks and stresses, that is, salinity and cyclones, and anthropogenic resource degradation, arising from shift towards brackish water shrimp cultivation, have resulted in a ‘double vulnerability’ context. However, even within the same context, differential resource endowments cause households of different socio-economic categories to adopt different livelihood strategies. This paper uses evidence from two coastal villages to illustrate how households manage their constraints and opportunities to gain optimum livelihood outcomes. In the first village, where protests by local farmers have stopped shrimp farming since 2008, small and medium farmers are trying to diversify their livelihoods through freshwater prawn-fish-crop integration, while some large landowners favouring the quick cash incomes from extensive shrimp cultivation are planning to shift towards intensive methods. In the second village, where decades of dry season shrimp cultivation has forced farmers to replace
    [Show full text]
  • JBES-Vol8no2-P283-29
    J. Bio. Env. Sci. 2016 Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences (JBES) ISSN: 2220-6663 (Print) 2222-3045 (Online) Vol. 8, No. 2, p. 283-292, 2016 http://www.innspub.net RESEARCH PAPER OPEN ACCESS Suitability of pond sand filter as an alternative safe drinking water technology at the Sundarban Region, Bangladesh Md. Rajib Hossain1, Sayeed Shahriyar2*, Md. Atiqur Rahman1, Fahim Rahman Sabab3, Nabila Nawshin1, A.B.M. Forhad1 1Department of Environmental Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh 2Department of Biotechnology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh 3Department of Environmental Science and Management, North South University, Bangladesh Article published on February 28, 2016 Key words: Coastal Region, Pond Sand Filter, Water Supply System, Coliform Bacteria. Abstract Water is the most important thing for the survival of human beings because man cannot live without water for a single moment. The coastal region of Bangladesh faces pure drinking water crisis due to saline water intrusion and iron content of tube wells where pond sand filter (PSF) is using as alternative water supply system of southwestern coastal region specially Sudarban region of Bangladesh. This study was conducted to assess the quality of water and evaluate and compare the performance of these technologies at Mongla Upazila of Bagerhat District. For this purpose 24 water samples from six PSFs, eight protected pond (PP) and two reverse osmosis (RO) were collected and analyzed in the pre monsoon season. Different physico-chemical and biological parameters such as pH, electrical conductivity (EC), total dissolved solid (TDS), salinity, turbidity, ammonium (NH4+), total hardness, total alkalinity, Chloride (Cl-), total coliform and fecal coliform were measured both in PSFs and PP water.
    [Show full text]
  • Name and Address
    Name and Address Institute Type = ALL Zone: KHULNA Institute = ALL District: BAGERHAT Upazilla: ALL For Whom = ALL Mpo Enlisted = N/A Union: ALL Management Type = ALL Institute Type: School Region = All Geographical Location = All Total No. of Institute: 317 SL# DISTRICT THANA INSTITUTE NAME EIIN Address Phone/Mobile EMAIL Updated Date 1 BAGERHAT BAGERHAT ADARSHA SECONDARY 114758 Village: SADHINATA SARANI 20/8 Union: 046862494 adarshahighschool11475 18/04/2019 SADAR SCHOOL WARD NO-03 Upazila: BAGERHAT 01727012404 [email protected] SADAR District: BAGERHAT Zone: KHULNA 2 BAGERHAT BAGERHAT AL ISLAH ACADEMY BAGERHAT 114762 Village: 110 Kanjahani Ali Road Union: 046862782 al-islahacademy@gmail. 27/03/2019 SADAR WARD NO 4 Upazila: BAGERHAT 01911434448 com SADAR District: BAGERHAT Zone: KHULNA 3 BAGERHAT BAGERHAT ARPARA KURSHAIL HIGH 131288 Village: ARPARA Union: BARAI PARA 01720361024 [email protected] 26/04/2017 SADAR SCHOOL Upazila: BAGERHAT SADAR District: BAGERHAT Zone: KHULNA 4 BAGERHAT BAGERHAT BAGERHAT SAMMILANI 114764 Village: Sarui Union: WARD NO 4 046863766 swapankumarkirttania@ 25/03/2019 SADAR SECONDARY SCHOOL Upazila: BAGERHAT SADAR District: 01718516314 gmail.com BAGERHAT Zone: KHULNA 5 BAGERHAT BAGERHAT BAGERHAT GOVT. GIRLS' 114766 Village: Amla Para Union: WARD NO 5 0468-62375 [email protected] 01/04/2019 SADAR HIGH SCHOOL Upazila: BAGERHAT SADAR District: 01715072405 BAGERHAT Zone: KHULNA 6 BAGERHAT BAGERHAT BAGERHAT AMLAPARA HIGH 114768 Village: SARUI Union: 6 Upazila: 046862446 [email protected] 16/03/2019 SADAR SCHOOL BAGERHAT
    [Show full text]
  • Sundarban in a Global Perspective
    PAPER IND 2017 DISCUSSION PAPER SUNDARBAN IN A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE: LONG TERM ADAPTATION AND DEVELOPMENT THE SUNDARBAN LANDSCAPE IN A GLOBAL SETTING The Sundarban landscape/eco-region formed by the Rivers Ganga, Meghna and Brahmaputra is the tidally active lower part of the largest delta in the world consisting of a warren of rivers, creeks, marshes and alluvial floodplain. Morphological zones of this lower part of the delta are the Ganga tidal plain (West) between rivers Hugli and Baleswar, the Ganga tidal plain (East) between rivers Baleswar and Tetulia, and the Meghna deltaic plain stretching from river Tetulia until Chittagong coastal plain. At the confluence of the delta and the Bay of Bengal, is the single largest mangrove patch of the world spread across about 10,300 sq km of which about 60 percent is in Bangladesh and the rest in India. This mangrove patch is acknowledged worldwide for its outstanding biodiversity, including the Bengal Tiger, and designated as World Heritage Site in both the countries. This littoral mangrove forest besides serving as the habitat for about 200 tigers, accounting for five percent of the global population in the wild, also imparts protection from storm surges caused by tropical cyclones by attenuating the impact of cyclones that recur on sub-decadal time scales in the Bay of Bengal. For the purpose of this discussion paper, the Sundarban landscape/eco-region encompasses the Sundarban Reserve Forest (SRF) of about 6000 sq km (including 1397 sq km of Protected Area (PA)) and the Sundarban Impact Zone (SIZ) in Bangladesh, and parts of Barguna and Perojpur districts outside the SIZ due to their similar characteristics because of presence of tidal channels (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • 01 Bagerhat Zila Total 703 3327 1677 1650 657 24 10 01 1 Bagerhat Zila
    Table C-12 : Distribution of Ethnic Households, Population by Sex, Residence and Community Administrative Unit Ethnic Ethnic Population in Main Groups UN / MZ / ZL UZ Vill RMO Residence Population WA MH Community Households Barmon Khiyang Chakma Others Both Male Female 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 01 Bagerhat Zila Total 703 3327 1677 1650 657 24 10 2636 01 1 Bagerhat Zila 624 3008 1507 1501 648 24 7 2329 01 2 Bagerhat Zila 13 39 24 15 0 0 3 36 01 3 Bagerhat Zila 66 280 146 134 9 0 0 271 01 08 Bagerhat Sadar Upazila Total 195 890 445 445 606 0 0 284 01 08 1 Bagerhat Sadar Upazila 188 860 427 433 606 0 0 254 01 08 2 Bagerhat Sadar Upazila 7 30 18 12 0 0 0 30 01 08 Bagerhat Paurashava 7 30 18 12 0 0 0 30 01 08 01 Ward No-01 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 08 02 Ward No-02 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 08 03 Ward No-03 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 08 04 Ward No-04 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 08 05 Ward No-05 Total 7 30 18 12 0 0 0 30 01 08 06 Ward No-06 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 08 07 Ward No-07 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 08 08 Ward No-08 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 08 09 Ward No-09 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 08 17 Barai Para Union Total 131 658 328 330 606 0 0 52 01 08 25 Bemarta Union Total 1 5 2 3 0 0 0 5 01 08 34 Bishnupur Union Total 17 70 32 38 0 0 0 70 01 08 35 Dema Union Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 08 51 Gota Para Union Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 08 60 Jatrapur Union Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 08 69 Kara Para Union Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 08 77 Khanpur Union Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 08 86 Rakhalgachhi Union Total 39 127 65 62 0 0 0 127 01 08 94 Shat Gambuj Union Total 0
    [Show full text]
  • Bdwbqbiqvix Dc‡Rjvwfwëk Dckvi‡Fvmx‡`I Zzjbvgjk Msl¨V
    BDwbqbIqvix Dc‡RjvwfwËK DcKvi‡fvMx‡`i Zzjbvg~jK msL¨v Division District Name of Upazila Name of Union Upazila-wise Population Poverty Given by MoF Census '2011 Index Barisal Barguna Amtali Amtali union 24,155 Arpangashia union 14,873 Atharagashia union 23,444 Barabagi union 18,399 Chhota Bagi union 13,197 Chowra union 20,802 Gulisakhali union 28,458 Haldia union 29,727 Karaibaria union 12,920 Kukua union 24,028 Nishanbaria union 12,928 Pancha Koralia union 11,490 Sarikkhali union 7,804 Sonakata union 11,266 Barisal Barguna Amtali Upazila Total 276,740 253,491 50.40% Barisal Barguna Bamna Bamna union 20,085 Bukabunia union 21,400 Dauatala union 20,693 Ramna union 17,386 Barisal Barguna Bamna Upazila Total 72,767 79,564 37.00% Barisal Barguna Barguna Sadar Ayla Patakata union 19,782 Badarkhali union 26,201 Barguna union 20,599 Burir Char union 29,542 Dhalua union 25,700 Phuljhury union 13,205 Gaurichanna union 27,675 Keorabunia union 17,755 M.Baliatali union 28,944 Naltona union 19,705 Barisal Barguna Barguna Sadar Upazila Total 254,791 229,108 44.40% Barisal Barguna Betagi Betagi union 15,757 Bibichini union 17,347 Bura Mazumdar union 14,016 Hosnabad union 16,276 Kazirabad union 14,247 Mokamia union 14,165 Sarishamuri union 15,133 Barisal Barguna Betagi Upazila Total 120,359 106,941 27.60% Barisal Barguna Patharghata Char Duanti union 24,563 Kakchira union 20,720 Kalmegha union 25,894 Kanthaltali union 19,788 Nachna Para union 12,484 Patharghata union 28,491 Raihanpur union 14,810 Barisal Barguna Patharghata Upazila Total 172,259 146,750
    [Show full text]
  • Mongla Upazila Profile District: Bagerhat
    Mongla Upazila Profile District: Bagerhat December 2014 Local Capacity Building and Community Empowerment (LCBCE) Programme. Supported by: UNICEF 1 | P a g e Table of Content Sl # Content Page # 1. Union Map 03 2. Background 04 3. Socio-economic condition 04 4. Geography 04 5. Disaster/ Vulnérabilités 05 6. Hard-to-Reach Areas. 05 7. Population in general 05 8. Child Population 06 9. Snapshot of situation of children and women in the union 06 10. Health and Nutrition 07 11. Situation of Birth Registration, Disability and Child Marriage 08 12. Child Labour 08 13. Education: Pre Primary, Primary and Secondary level 09 14. Water and Sanitation 10 15. Service by NGOs 10 16. Table 1.1: Union wise Sex disaggregated population data 12 17. Table 1.2: Age specific child population 12 18. Table 2.1: Union wise number of Children fully immunized or left out 13 19. Table 2.2: Union wise number of pregnant women with status of IFA intake 13 20. Table 2.3: Infrastructure and facilities/ Health & FP 14 21. Table 2.4 and 2.5: HR status of Health and FP 14 22. Table 3.1: Situation of birth registration child labour, disability 15 23. Table 4.1: Pre-primary Education coverage 15 24. Table 4.2: Primary Education coverage 16 25. Table 4.3: Secondary education coverage 16 26. Table 4.4: Infrastructure and facilities of Educational institution 17 27. Table 4.5: HR status of Institution 17 28. Table 5.1: Source of safe water and water Coverage 18 29. Table 5.2: Sanitation Coverage 18 30.
    [Show full text]
  • Sundarban-In-A-Global-Perspective
    PAPER IND Public Disclosure Authorized 2017 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized DISCUSSION PAPER SUNDARBAN IN A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE: LONG TERM ADAPTATION AND DEVELOPMENT Public Disclosure Authorized THE SUNDARBAN LANDSCAPE IN A GLOBAL SETTING The Sundarban landscape/eco-region formed by the Rivers Ganga, Meghna and Brahmaputra is the tidally active lower part of the largest delta in the world consisting of a warren of rivers, creeks, marshes and alluvial floodplain. Morphological zones of this lower part of the delta are the Ganga tidal plain (West) between rivers Hugli and Baleswar, the Ganga tidal plain (East) between rivers Baleswar and Tetulia, and the Meghna deltaic plain stretching from river Tetulia until Chittagong coastal plain. At the confluence of the delta and the Bay of Bengal, is the single largest mangrove patch of the world spread across about 10,300 sq km of which about 60 percent is in Bangladesh and the rest in India. This mangrove patch is acknowledged worldwide for its outstanding biodiversity, including the Bengal Tiger, and designated as World Heritage Site in both the countries. This littoral mangrove forest besides serving as the habitat for about 200 tigers, accounting for five percent of the global population in the wild, also imparts protection from storm surges caused by tropical cyclones by attenuating the impact of cyclones that recur on sub-decadal time scales in the Bay of Bengal. For the purpose of this discussion paper, the Sundarban landscape/eco-region encompasses the Sundarban Reserve Forest (SRF) of about 6000 sq km (including 1397 sq km of Protected Area (PA)) and the Sundarban Impact Zone (SIZ) in Bangladesh, and parts of Barguna and Perojpur districts outside the SIZ due to their similar characteristics because of presence of tidal channels (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • PROFILE of SONAILTALA UNION Mongla: Upazila District: Bagerhat
    P a g e | 1 PROFILE Of SONAILTALA UNION Mongla: Upazila District: Bagerhat November-2014 P a g e | 2 Table of Content Sl # Content Page # 1. Union Map 03 2. Background, Socio-economic conditions , Disaster Vulnerabilities 04 3. Socio-economic condition 04 4. Geography 04 5. Disaster/ Vulnérabilités 04 6. Hard-to-Reach Areas. 05 7. Population in general 05 8. Child Population 05 9. Snapshot of situation of children and women in the union 06 10. Health and Nutrition 07 11. Situation of Birth Registration, Disability and Child Marriage 08 12. Child Labour 08 13. Education: Pre Primary, Primary and Secondary level 08 14. Water and Sanitation 09 15. Service by NGOs 09 16. Union Parishad Functional Status 09 17. Table 1.1: Ward wise Sex disaggregated population data 11 18. Table 1.2: Age specific child population 11 19. Table 2.1: Ward wise number of Children fully immunized or left out 12 20. Table 2.2: Ward wise number of pregnant women with status of IFA intake 12 21. Table 2.3: Infrastructure and facilities/ Health & FP 13 22. Table 2.4 and 2.5: HR status of Health and FP 13 23. Table 3.1: Situation of birth registration child labour, disability 14 24. Table 4.1: Pre-primary Education coverage 14 25. Table 4.2: Primary Education coverage 15 26. Table 4.3: Secondary education coverage 15 27. Table 4.4: Infrastructure and facilities of Educational institution 16 28. Table 4.5: HR status of Institution 16 29. Table 5.1: Source of safe water and water Coverage 17 30.
    [Show full text]