DOCSLIB.ORG

FCC Form 477 Filers, National Level, As of June 30, 2015 (As Submitted

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FCC Form 477 Filers, National Level, As of June 30, 2015 (As Submitted FCC Form 477 Filers, National Level, as of June 30, 2015 (as submitted in filings made or revised as of June 24, 2016) Local Exchange Telephone or Interconnected Affiliate Name Assigned for Form 477 Purposes * Broadband VoIP Mobile Voice 1 Point Communications - X - 101Netlink X X - 1stel, Inc. X X - 1stPoint Communications, LLC XX - 24/7 Chesapeake Holdings, LLC X - - 2Geton Net, Inc. X - - 3 Rivers Telephone Cooperative, Inc. X X - 3 Rooms Communications LLC X- - 360 Communications, LLC X- - 4 SIWI LLC X X - 8x8, Inc. - X - @Link Services, LLC X- - A Better Wireless, NISP, LLC X - - A+ Wireless, Inc. - X - A1 Assets, Inc. - X - Abacus Group, Inc. - X - ABRY Partners X X - Absaraka Cooperative Telephone Co., Inc. X X - Accent Communication Services, Inc. - X - Access Cable Television, Inc. X X - Access Communications, LLC XX - Access One, Inc. X X - Access Point, Inc. - X - Accessline Holdings, Inc. - X - Accipiter Communications, Inc. X X - Ace Telephone Association X X - Acme Communications, Inc. X X - Action Communications, Inc. X X - ActiveServe, Inc. - X - Adak Eagle Enterprises, LLC X X X Adams CATV Inc. X X - Adams Telephone Co-Operative X X - ADT Systems, Inc. X - - Advanced Corporate Networking, Inc. X - - Advanced Integrated Technologies Inc. - X - Advanced Technology Distributors, Inc. - X - Aeneas Communications, LLC XX - Aero Communications LLC XX - AFES Network Services LLC X- - Affiniti Holdings Inc. X X - Ag Prospects, LLC X - - Agate Mutual Telephone Cooperative Association X X - Agile Networks X - - Agri-Valley Communications, Inc. XXX Air Advantage, LLC X- - Air Link Rural Broadband, LLC X - - Air Wave Communications, LLC X- - AireBeam XX - Airespring, Inc. - X - AirFiber X- - Page 1, August 3, 2016 FCC Form 477 Filers, National Level, as of June 30, 2015 (as submitted in filings made or revised as of June 24, 2016) Local Exchange Telephone or Interconnected Affiliate Name Assigned for Form 477 Purposes * Broadband VoIP Mobile Voice AirLink Internet Services X - - Airosurf Communications, Inc. X - - AirRunner Networks LLC X- - Akabis, Inc. - X - Alamo Broadband Inc. X - - AlasConnect, Inc. X - - Alaska Communications Systems Holdings, Inc. XX - Alaska Power & Telephone, Inc. X X - Albany Mutual Telephone Association XX - Albany, Water, Gas and Light Commission X- - Albion Telephone Company, Inc. X X - Alenco Communications, Inc. X X - Algona Municipal Utilities X X - Alhambra-Grantfork Communications, Inc. XX - Alianza, Inc. - X - AlignTec, LLC X - - All West Communications, Inc. X X - Allband Communications Cooperative XX - Allen's TV Cable Service, Inc. X X - Alliance Communications Cooperative, Inc. X X X Alliance Connect, LLC X X - Alliant Technologies, LLC - X - Allied Telecom Group, LLC X X - Allo Communications LLC XX - AllureTech/Coffeynet XX - Allvoitel, Inc. X - - Ally Telecom, LLC -X- Alma Communications Company XX - Alma Telecom, Inc. X X - Aloha Broadband X - - Alpheus Communications, LLC XX - Alpine Communications, LLC XX - ALSAT Wireless X X - Alta Municipal Utilities X X - AltaWorx LLC - X - Alternative Phone, Inc. - X - Alternative Technologies - X - Alteva Inc. X X - ALTIUS Communications LLC X- - Alvarez Technology Group, Inc. - X - Alyrica X- - AM3 Holding Corp. X X - Amaranthine Technology X- - America Internet & Communications X- - American Broadband Communications et al. X X X American Samoa Telecom, LLC X-X American Telephone Company LLC -X- American Wireless, Inc. (MO) X - - American Wireless, Inc. (UT) X X - Amery Telcom, Inc. X X - Page 2, August 3, 2016 FCC Form 477 Filers, National Level, as of June 30, 2015 (as submitted in filings made or revised as of June 24, 2016) Local Exchange Telephone or Interconnected Affiliate Name Assigned for Form 477 Purposes * Broadband VoIP Mobile Voice AMG Technology Investment Group X X - Amherst Telephone Company XX - AMP Networks LLC -X- Ampersand Technologies LLC X - - Amplex Electric, Inc. X X - América Móvil X X X Anne Arundel Broadband, LLC X X - Ansteorria Inc. X - - Answer360 Telecommunications LLC -X- Antelecom, Inc. X - - Anveo, Inc. - X - Anvil Communications, Inc. X - - ANZ Communications, LLC -X- AP TeleGuam Holdings, Inc. X X X Appia Communications, Inc. - X - Applied Messaging, Inc. - X - Apptix, Inc. - X - Aptitude Internet LLC X - - APX Net, Inc. X - - Arapahoe Telephone Company X X - Arbuckle Communications, Inc. X X - Arcadia Telephone Cooperative X X - Arctic Slope Telephone Association Cooperative, Inc. X X X Arena One, LLC - X - Aristotle Inc. X - - Arizona Nevada Tower Corporation X - - Arkansas Telephone Company, Inc. X X - Arkwest Communications, Inc. XX - Armstrong Holdings, Inc. X X - Arrowtel, Inc. - X - Artisan Infrastructure Inc. - X - Arvig Enterprises, Inc. X X - Asset Black, LLC X X - AT&T Inc. X X X ATG Communications, LLC X- - Athena Broadband, G.P. X X - ATI Applied Technology, LLC - X - ATIS, Inc. X X - Atkins Telephone Company XX - Atlantech Online, Inc. X X - Atlantic Metro Communications II, Inc. - X - Atlantic Tele-Network XXX Atlantic Telephone Membership Corporation X X - Atlas Telephone Company, Inc. X X - Atwood Cable Systems, Inc. X X - Auravox, LLC - X - Aurora Communications, Inc. X X - Autus Technology, LLC -X- AvayaLive Inc. - X - Avenue Broadband Holdings, Inc. X X - Page 3, August 3, 2016 FCC Form 477 Filers, National Level, as of June 30, 2015 (as submitted in filings made or revised as of June 24, 2016) Local Exchange Telephone or Interconnected Affiliate Name Assigned for Form 477 Purposes * Broadband VoIP Mobile Voice Axcede LLC - X - Axiom Technologies X - - Axion Communications -X- AxisInternet, Inc. - X - Axxis Communications/Gorge Networks XX - Ayersville Telephone Company XX - Ayrshire Farmers Mutual Telephone Company XX - B&B Communications, Ltd. X - - B2X Online, Inc. X X - Baca Valley Telephone Company, Inc. X X - Back 40 Wireless LLC X - - Backroads Broadband X - - Bailey Cable TV, Inc. X - - Balatize Broadband Services, LLC X - - Baldwin Nashville Telephone Company, Inc. X X X Baldwin Telecom, Inc. X X - Ballard Rural Telephone Cooperative Corporation, Inc. X X - BalsamWest FiberNET, LLC X X - Banc Central Financial Services Corp. X - - BandTel, LLC - X - Bandwidth.com, Inc. - X - Baraga Telephone Company X X - Barbourville Utility Commission X- - Barden Technology, LLC - X - Barnes City Cooperative Telephone Company X X X Barry Communications, Inc. - X - Barry County Services Company XX - Bascom Mutual Telephone Company XX - Basin 2 Way Radio, Inc. X - - Basin Broadband X - - Battles Xtreme Networks X - - Bayou Cable Inc. X - - BCM Electronics, Inc. - X - BCN Telecom, Inc. - X - BCT Consulting, Inc. - X - BeaDun Communications X- - Beamspeed, LLC X - - Bear River Communications, LLC XX - Beaver Creek Cooperative Telephone Company X X - Beaver Valley Cable Company XX - Bee Creek Communications, Inc. X - - Bee Line, Inc. X X - Beehive Telephone Companies X X - Beggs Telephone Company, Inc. X X - BEH Communications, LLC X- - BEK Communications Cooperative X X - Believe Wireless, LLC X - - Bellaire Television Cable Company, Inc. X - - BelWave Communications, Inc. X X - Ben Lomand XX - Page 4, August 3, 2016 FCC Form 477 Filers, National Level, as of June 30, 2015 (as submitted in filings made or revised as of June 24, 2016) Local Exchange Telephone or Interconnected Affiliate Name Assigned for Form 477 Purposes * Broadband VoIP Mobile Voice Benchmark Communications, LLC -X- BendTel, Inc. X X - Benton Cooperative Telephone Company X X - Benton Ridge Telephone Company X X - Benton Rural Electric Association X - - Beresford Municipal Telephone Company X X - Bergen Telephone Company X X - Bernard Telephone Company, Inc. X X X Bestline Communications, LP XX - Bethesda Wireless X - - Bethune Company, LLC X- - BetterWorld Telecom, LLC - X - BG Spirit LLC - X - Bi-Tec Company, Inc. - X - Biddeford Internet Corporation X X - Big Inc. - X - Big River Telephone, LLC X X - Big Sandy Broadband Inc. X X - Bijou Telephone Co-Op Association, Inc. X X - Biopass Medical Systems, Inc. - X - Bitcom, LLC X X - Bixby Telephone Company XX - Black Cloud Networks, Inc. - X - Blackfoot Telephone Cooperative, Inc. X X - Blanca Telephone Company/Jade Communications LLC XXX Blanchard Telephone Association, Inc. X X - Bledsoe Telephone Cooperative Inc. X X - Blip Networks, LLC X - - Block Communications, Inc. X X - Block Line Systems, LLC XX - Bloomer Telephone Company X X - Bloomingdale Home Telephone Company XX - Bloomingdale Telephone Company, Inc. X X - Bloosurf LLC X - - Blossom Telephone Co., Inc. X X - BlountBroadband LLC X - - Blu Sky Wireless X - - Blue Casa Telephone, LLC - X - Blue Mountain TV Cable Company X- - Blue Ridge Mountain Electric Membership Corporation X - - Blue River Networks, Inc. X X - Blue Valley Tele-Communications, Inc. X X - Bluebird Network, LLC X - - Bluebird Wireless Broadband Services, LLC X X - Blueriver Communications, Inc. X X - Bluespan Wireless, LLC X - - BlueVoice Network, LLC - X - BM Service Corp. X - - Board of Water, Light & Sinking Fund Commissioners XX - Bolder Thinking Communications, Inc. - X - Page 5, August 3, 2016 FCC Form 477 Filers, National Level, as of June 30, 2015 (as submitted in filings made or revised as of June 24, 2016) Local Exchange Telephone or Interconnected Affiliate Name Assigned for Form 477 Purposes * Broadband VoIP Mobile Voice Bolt Internet X - - Border to Border Communications, Inc. X X - Borealis Broadband Inc. X - - Borough of Kutztown XX - BounceLinx X- - Bowling Green Municipal Utilities X X - Boycom Cablevision, Inc./Partel Broadband
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix a Stations Transitioning on June 12
    APPENDIX A STATIONS TRANSITIONING ON JUNE 12 DMA CITY ST NETWORK CALLSIGN LICENSEE 1 ABILENE-SWEETWATER SWEETWATER TX ABC/CW (D KTXS-TV BLUESTONE LICENSE HOLDINGS INC. 2 ALBANY GA ALBANY GA NBC WALB WALB LICENSE SUBSIDIARY, LLC 3 ALBANY GA ALBANY GA FOX WFXL BARRINGTON ALBANY LICENSE LLC 4 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ADAMS MA ABC WCDC-TV YOUNG BROADCASTING OF ALBANY, INC. 5 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ALBANY NY NBC WNYT WNYT-TV, LLC 6 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ALBANY NY ABC WTEN YOUNG BROADCASTING OF ALBANY, INC. 7 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ALBANY NY FOX WXXA-TV NEWPORT TELEVISION LICENSE LLC 8 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY PITTSFIELD MA MYTV WNYA VENTURE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, LLC 9 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY SCHENECTADY NY CW WCWN FREEDOM BROADCASTING OF NEW YORK LICENSEE, L.L.C. 10 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY SCHENECTADY NY CBS WRGB FREEDOM BROADCASTING OF NEW YORK LICENSEE, L.L.C. 11 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM CW KASY-TV ACME TELEVISION LICENSES OF NEW MEXICO, LLC 12 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM UNIVISION KLUZ-TV ENTRAVISION HOLDINGS, LLC 13 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM PBS KNME-TV REGENTS OF THE UNIV. OF NM & BD.OF EDUC.OF CITY OF ALBUQ.,NM 14 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM ABC KOAT-TV KOAT HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC. 15 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM NBC KOB-TV KOB-TV, LLC 16 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM CBS KRQE LIN OF NEW MEXICO, LLC 17 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM TELEFUTURKTFQ-TV TELEFUTURA ALBUQUERQUE LLC 18 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE CARLSBAD NM ABC KOCT KOAT HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • ENGINEERING STATEMENT SUPPORTING a PETITION for RECONSIDERATION Prepared for United Communications Corporation KEYC-DT Mankato, Minnesota Facility ID: 68853 Ch
    ENGINEERING STATEMENT SUPPORTING A PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION prepared for United Communications Corporation KEYC-DT Mankato, Minnesota Facility ID: 68853 Ch. 12 15.2 kW (MAX-DA) 317 m United Communications Corporation (“United”) is the licensee of analog television station KEYC-TV Channel 12 and digital station KEYC-DT Channel 38, Facility ID: 68853, Mankato, Minnesota. United elected, for KEYC-TV’s post-transition facility, to operate on KEYC’s current analog Channel 12 in place of the 1998 allotted Channel 38. However, as a result of the channel election process, the actual coverage “foot-print” served by KEYC will be reduced from what it presently serves. Further, KEYC-TV Channel 12 currently operates using a non-directional antenna system. The final antenna pattern allotted by the Commission cannot be easily constructed with a real-world antenna. Using the existing non-directional antenna system forces KEYC to operate with a further reduction in power resulting in serious loss of coverage. The instant engineering statement has been prepared to support a request for a change in the station’s “certification” to permit replication of the authorized analog Grade B contour and to provide a practical implementation using station’s existing non-directional Channel 12 antenna. Background Appendix B of the Second Memorandum Opinion And Order On Reconsideration Of The Fifth And Sixth Report And Orders 1 (“MO&O”) clearly indicates that the KEYC Channel 38 allotment achieved the DTV/NTSC area match. Figure 1, attached hereto, provides a graphical comparison of the analog Grade B contour with the allotted Channel 38 facility.
    [Show full text]
  • Gray Television, Inc. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) February 27, 2020 (February 27, 2020) Gray Television, Inc. (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) Georgia (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation) 001-13796 58-0285030 (Commission File Number) (IRS Employer Identification No.) 4370 Peachtree Road, NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30319 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) 404-504-9828 (Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code) Not Applicable (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report) Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below): ☐ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) ☐ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) ☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) ☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the act: Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered Class A common stock (no par value) GTN.A New York Stock Exchange common stock (no par value) GTN New York Stock Exchange Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).
    [Show full text]
  • Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2016-196
    Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2016-196 PDF version Reference: 2016-147 Ottawa, 24 May 2016 Various licensees Various locations across Canada Various terrestrial broadcasting distribution undertakings – Administrative renewals 1. The Commission renews the broadcasting licences for the terrestrial broadcasting distribution undertakings set out in the appendix to this decision from 1 September 2016 to 30 November 2016, subject to the terms and conditions in effect under the current licences. 2. This decision does not dispose of any issue that may arise with respect to the renewal of these licences, including past non-compliance issues. The Commission is considering the renewal of these licences in Call for licence renewal applications: Submission of renewal applications for broadcasting licences of terrestrial distribution undertakings (BDUs) that will expire in 2016 and 2017; implementation of certain conditions of licence and review of practices in regard to the small basic and flexible packaging requirements for all BDU licensees, Broadcasting Notice of Consultation CRTC 2016-147, 21 April 2016. Secretary General *This decision is to be appended to each licence. Appendix to Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2016-196 Terrestrial broadcasting distribution undertakings for which the broadcasting licences have been administratively renewed until 30 November 2016 Licensee Locations Access Communications Co-operative Limited Regina (including White City), Saskatchewan Cogeco Cable Canada GP Inc. (the general Belleville, Burlington, Georgetown, partner)
    [Show full text]
  • How Local Providers Built the Nation's Best Internet Access in Rural North
    Broadband Association of North Dakota (BAND) How Local Providers Built the Nation’s Best Internet Access in Rural North Dakota By Katie Kienbaum, Ny Ony Razafindrabe, Michelle Andrews, and Christopher Mitchell May 2020 About the Institute for Local Self-Reliance The Institute for Local Self-Reliance has a vision of thriving, equitable communities. To reach this vision we build local power to fight corporate control. We are a national research and advocacy organization that partners with allies across the country to build an American economy driven by local priorities and accountable to people and the planet. About the Authors Katie Kienbaum is a Research Associate with the Community Broadband Networks initiative at the Institute for Local Self-Reliance (ILSR) where she researches and writes about community owned networks and rural cooperatives. Ny Ony Razafindrabe is a GIS and Data Visualization intern with the Community Broadband Networks initiative team where she creates informative data visualizations and maps. Michelle Andrews is a GIS and Data Visualization Researcher with the Community Broadband Networks initiative at ILSR where she performs data analysis and generates maps. Christopher Mitchell is the Director of the Community Broadband Networks initiative at ILSR. His work focuses on telecommunication policy and advocating for local Internet choice in communities. For up-to-date information, follow @ILSR and @MuniNetworks on Twitter. Follow Christopher Mitchell on Twitter @CommunityNets for more This report is licensed under information on the latest research a Creative Commons from Community Broadband license. You are free to Networks initiative. replicate and distribute it, as long as you attribute it to ILSR.
    [Show full text]
  • QUESTION 20-1/2 Examination of Access Technologies for Broadband Communications
    International Telecommunication Union QUESTION 20-1/2 Examination of access technologies for broadband communications ITU-D STUDY GROUP 2 3rd STUDY PERIOD (2002-2006) Report on broadband access technologies eport on broadband access technologies QUESTION 20-1/2 R International Telecommunication Union ITU-D THE STUDY GROUPS OF ITU-D The ITU-D Study Groups were set up in accordance with Resolutions 2 of the World Tele- communication Development Conference (WTDC) held in Buenos Aires, Argentina, in 1994. For the period 2002-2006, Study Group 1 is entrusted with the study of seven Questions in the field of telecommunication development strategies and policies. Study Group 2 is entrusted with the study of eleven Questions in the field of development and management of telecommunication services and networks. For this period, in order to respond as quickly as possible to the concerns of developing countries, instead of being approved during the WTDC, the output of each Question is published as and when it is ready. For further information: Please contact Ms Alessandra PILERI Telecommunication Development Bureau (BDT) ITU Place des Nations CH-1211 GENEVA 20 Switzerland Telephone: +41 22 730 6698 Fax: +41 22 730 5484 E-mail: [email protected] Free download: www.itu.int/ITU-D/study_groups/index.html Electronic Bookshop of ITU: www.itu.int/publications © ITU 2006 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. International Telecommunication Union QUESTION 20-1/2 Examination of access technologies for broadband communications ITU-D STUDY GROUP 2 3rd STUDY PERIOD (2002-2006) Report on broadband access technologies DISCLAIMER This report has been prepared by many volunteers from different Administrations and companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Keyc-Tv, Wwny-Tv, Wnyf-Cd and Wwny-Cd
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Amendment to the Commission’s Rules ) MB Docket 15-71 Concerning Market Modification ) ) Implementation of Section 102 of the STELA ) Reauthorization Act of 2014 ) To: Office of Secretary Attention: The Commission COMMENTS OF UNITED COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION KEYC-TV, WWNY-TV, WNYF-CD AND WWNY-CD United Communications Corporation ("UCC"), by counsel, hereby submits its Comments in response to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking1 (the “NPRM”), in which the Commission announced proposed rules to implement Section 102 of the Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act (“STELA”) Reauthorization Act of 2015 (“STELAR”). In the experience of UCC, the current satellite carriage rules, bound as they are by somewhat artificial DMA boundaries, do not necessarily result in carriage of the television stations that provide the most effective locally- oriented programming for the communities where the satellite subscribers live. The rules set forth in the NPRM represent a significant step toward remedying this problem. Accordingly, UCC urges the Commission to adopt the proposed rules, subject to certain refinements discussed below. 1 Market Modification, MB Docket No. 15-71, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 15-34, rel. March 26, 2015. BACKGROUND UCC is the licensee of full-power television stations KEYC-TV, Mankato, Minnesota, Fac. ID 68853, and WWNY-TV, Carthage, New York, Fac. ID 68851 as well as Class A Television Station WNYF-CD, Watertown, New York, Fac. ID 168478, and Class A Television Station WWNY-CD, Massena, New York, Fac. ID 16744. Stations KEYC-TV and WWNY-TV are CBS affiliates, Station WNYF-CD and WWNY-CD are Fox affiliates, and Fox programming is also carried on the second digital stream of the CBS stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Telecommunications Provider Locator
    Telecommunications Provider Locator Industry Analysis & Technology Division Wireline Competition Bureau February 2003 This report is available for reference in the FCC’s Information Center at 445 12th Street, S.W., Courtyard Level. Copies may be purchased by calling Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898, or via e-mail [email protected]. This report can be downloaded and interactively searched on the FCC-State Link Internet site at www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/locator.html. Telecommunications Provider Locator This report lists the contact information and the types of services sold by 5,364 telecommunications providers. The last report was released November 27, 2001.1 All information in this report is drawn from providers’ April 1, 2002, filing of the Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet (FCC Form 499-A).2 This report can be used by customers to identify and locate telecommunications providers, by telecommunications providers to identify and locate others in the industry, and by equipment vendors to identify potential customers. Virtually all providers of telecommunications must file FCC Form 499-A each year.3 These forms are not filed with the FCC but rather with the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC), which serves as the data collection agent. Information from filings received after November 22, 2002, and from filings that were incomplete has been excluded from the tables. Although many telecommunications providers offer an extensive menu of services, each filer is asked on Line 105 of FCC Form 499-A to select the single category that best describes its telecommunications business.
    [Show full text]
  • 1)5Ling the World
    Scanning-- Shortwave -- Satellites -- Harr Radio -- Computers-- Internet Volune 20, No. 10 October3001 U.S. s4.25 Can. s6.50 Printed in the United States WW1 TF8GX e # 1)5Ling the World VP2EK MIGUILLA 1.0041. noor DL4ZAA ' GERMAN AMATEUR RADIO STATION EK6TA Also in this issue: Smoky Mountain Special ALeaf Looker's Frequency Guide "A versatile HF/6-meter receiver that offers a good measure of performance in a compact package. All mode capability for the ham and utility listeners and synchronous AM for the SWLs should make the 1R75 a popular choice for a wide variety of radio enthusiasts." - QS; 1/00 The IC -R75covers a wide O COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVER frequency range, 0.03 - 60.0 ICOM IC-R75 F 1453 SSB CW/RTTYFIL MHz'', allowing you to listen in USB 4 5.6 to a world of information. With CI II PIF AM I FM TS innovativefeaturesliketwin I _I Pal 8 9 rrrlEAIIIP 2 ATT ANTI AGC passband tuning,synchronous ' 20 10 FO.10 al CI 0 ENT AM detection, DSP capabilities, remote PC control and more - 41111111 A11411RFINOL MIN PVT VIM MW CLR shortwavelisteningiseasier . I WI' sat than ever. All this comes in a r SEA. SCAN PHONES 127,7113 .t141, .rfow compact,lightweight package CUM 111111 ill rim that can be conveniently used in your ham shack, den or car. RAMP ATT NR ANF AGC Winner of the "Best Value Receiver" Award in the 2000 Edition of WRTH -Editorial section, 2001 WRTH IC -R75 Pull out the weak signals! PULL OUT THE WEAK SIGNALS 100 kHz 60 MHz R75 Commercial Grade The IC -R75 sports a remarkable arsenal of signal detection weapons, ready for your command: Synchronous AM Detection (S -AM) A triple conversion receive system rejects image and spurious signals.
    [Show full text]
  • Application for Forbearance from the Regulation of Residential Local Exchange Services
    Telecom Decision CRTC 2018-109 PDF version Ottawa, 29 March 2018 Public record: 8640-S22-201711648 Saskatchewan Telecommunications – Application for forbearance from the regulation of residential local exchange services The Commission approves SaskTel’s request for forbearance from the regulation of residential local exchange services in the exchange of North Battleford, Saskatchewan. Application 1. The Commission received an application from Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel), dated 15 December 2017, in which the company requested forbearance from the regulation of residential local exchange services1 in the exchange of North Battleford, Saskatchewan. 2. The Commission received a submission regarding SaskTel’s application from Rogers Communications Canada Inc. (RCCI). Commission’s analysis and determinations 3. Pursuant to the Commission’s requirements in Telecom Decision 2006-15, SaskTel provided evidence to support its forbearance request, including competitor quality of service (Q of S) results for the six months preceding its application, and a draft communications plan for the Commission’s approval. The Commission has assessed SaskTel’s application based on the local forbearance test set out in Telecom Decision 2006-15 by examining the four criteria set out below. Product market 4. The Commission received no comments with respect to SaskTel’s proposed list of residential local exchange services. 5. SaskTel is seeking forbearance from the regulation of 11 tariffed residential local exchange services. The Commission notes that 10 of these services were included in the list of services set out in Telecom Decision 2005-35-1. The other service, Feature 1 In this decision, “residential local exchange services” refers to local exchange services used by residential customers to access the public switched telephone network and any associated service charges, features, and ancillary services.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between Local Content, Internet Development and Access Prices
    THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOCAL CONTENT, INTERNET DEVELOPMENT AND ACCESS PRICES This research is the result of collaboration in 2011 between the Internet Society (ISOC), the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). The first findings of the research were presented at the sixth annual meeting of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) that was held in Nairobi, Kenya on 27-30 September 2011. The views expressed in this presentation are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of ISOC, the OECD or UNESCO, or their respective membership. FOREWORD This report was prepared by a team from the OECD's Information Economy Unit of the Information, Communications and Consumer Policy Division within the Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry. The contributing authors were Chris Bruegge, Kayoko Ido, Taylor Reynolds, Cristina Serra- Vallejo, Piotr Stryszowski and Rudolf Van Der Berg. The case studies were drafted by Laura Recuero Virto of the OECD Development Centre with editing by Elizabeth Nash and Vanda Legrandgerard. The work benefitted from significant guidance and constructive comments from ISOC and UNESCO. The authors would particularly like to thank Dawit Bekele, Constance Bommelaer, Bill Graham and Michuki Mwangi from ISOC and Jānis Kārkliņš, Boyan Radoykov and Irmgarda Kasinskaite-Buddeberg from UNESCO for their work and guidance on the project. The report relies heavily on data for many of its conclusions and the authors would like to thank Alex Kozak, Betsy Masiello and Derek Slater from Google, Geoff Huston from APNIC, Telegeography (Primetrica, Inc) and Karine Perset from the OECD for data that was used in the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-59
    Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-59 Ottawa, 25 July 2007 Bell Aliant – Applications for forbearance from the regulation of residential local exchange services Reference: 8640-B54-200706096, 8640-B54-200706111, 8640-B54-200706129, 8640-B54-200706153, 8640-B54-200706632 (New Brunswick); 8640-B54-200705551, 8640-B54-200705809, 8640-B54-200705824, 8640-B54-200705874, 8640-B54-200705890, 8640-B54-200705957, 8640-B54-200705981, 8640-B54-200705999, 8640-B54-200706020, 8640-B54-200706038, 8640-B54-200706731 (Nova Scotia); 8640-B54-200706046, 8640-B54-200706054, 8640-B54-200706062, 8640-B54-200706070, 8640-B54-200706723 (Prince Edward Island); and 8640-C12-200706351 (general) In this Decision, the Commission approves Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership's (Bell Aliant) request for forbearance from the regulation of residential local exchange services in 72 exchanges in New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and Prince Edward Island. The Commission denies Bell Aliant's request for forbearance in 8 exchanges. Introduction 1. The Commission received applications by Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant), dated between 11 and 30 April 2007, in which the company requested forbearance from the regulation of residential local exchange services1 in 80 exchanges in New Brunswick, Nova Scotia – including exchanges in the priority census metropolitan area (CMA) of Halifax2 – and Prince Edward Island. 2. In a letter dated 7 May 2007, the Commission directed incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs), competitive local exchange
    [Show full text]