(A) Phylogeny of Taxa, (B) by Superfamily, (C) by Order

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(A) Phylogeny of Taxa, (B) by Superfamily, (C) by Order A B C Guillenia lasiophylla Caulanthus amplexicaulis Streptanthus heterophyllus Brassicaceae sp Streptanthus arizonicus Sisymbrium leucocladum Isatis lusitanica Isatis tinctoria Myagrum perfoliatum Sinapis alba Hirschfeldia incana Eruca vesicaria Sisymbrium brassiciforme Cakile maritima Crambe hispanica Psychine stylosa Thlaspi arvense Calepina irregularis Goldbachia laevigata Cochlearia officinalis Teesdalia nudicaulis Farsetia aegyptia Lobularia maritima Iberis amara Schizopetalum walkeri Lunaria annua Capsella bursa-pastoris Olimoarabidopsis pumila Physaria acutifolia Turritis glabra Erysimum cheiranthoides Malcomia maritima Descurainia pinnata Descurainia sophioides Lepidium ruderale Lepidium sativuum Barbarea bracteosa Rorippa islandica Nasturtium officinale Cardamine hirsuta Meniocus linifolius Euclidium syriacum Matthiola longipetala Hesperis matronalis Diptychocarpus strictus Chorispora tenella Aethionema arabicum Tarenaya hassleriana Cleomaceae sp Melidiscus giganteus Gynandropsis gynandra Arivela viscosa Coalisina paradoxa Coalisina angustifolia Polanisia trachysperma Polanisia dodecandra Polanisia graveolens Polanisia sp Cleome arabica Cleome africana \Cleome violacea Cleomella serrulata Capparaceae sp Capparis fascicularis Boscia sp Cadaba natalensis Reseda odorata Ochradenus baccatus Batis maritima Moringa oleifera Carica papaya 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Proportion of repetitive elements by Superfamily Proportion of repetitive elements by Order other non−ltr other ltr RandI RTE L1 Novosib Harbinger Helitron non−ltr_retrotransposon retrotransposon retrotransposon other dna RTEX Copia MuDR SINE2/tRNA Penelope Gypsy hAT transposon ltr_retrotransposon dna_transposon Supplemental Figure 1. Proportion plots of transposable element abundance scaled to 100%. (A) phylogeny of taxa, (B) by superfamily, (C) by order. Family Bataceae Brassicaceae Capparaceae Cariaceae Cleomaceae Moringaceae Resadaceae Supplemental Figure 2. Comparison of phylogenetic relationships across Brassicales in the ASTRAL tree obtained from transcriptome data (left) and based on hierarchical clustering of TE abundances (right). A Meniocus linifolius Olimoarabidopsis pumila Descurainia sophioides Capsella bursa-pastoris Descurainia pinnata Farsetia aegyptia Olimoarabidopsis pumila Caulanthus amplexicaulis Capsella bursa-pastoris Descurainia sophioides Physaria acutifolia Crambe hispanica Turritis glabra Turritis glabra Erysimum cheiranthoides Euclidium syriacum Malcomia maritima Psychine stylosa Lepidium ruderale Cardamine hirsuta Lepidium sativuum Meniocus linifolius Cardamine hirsuta Lepidium ruderale Nasturtium officinale Guillenia lasiophylla Rorippa islandica Streptanthus heterophyllus Barbarea bracteosa Malcomia maritima Farsetia aegyptia Lepidium sativuum Lobularia maritima Hirschfeldia incana Iberis amara Descurainia pinnata Goldbachia laevigata Sinapis alba Calepina irregularis Rorippa islandica Psychine stylosa Goldbachia laevigata Crambe hispanica Calepina irregularis Hirschfeldia incana Sisymbrium brassiciforme Sinapis alba Isatis tinctoria Sisymbrium brassiciforme Barbarea bracteosa Eruca vesicaria Nasturtium officinale Cakile maritima Lobularia maritima Caulanthus amplexicaulis Iberis amara Guillenia lasiophylla Erysimum cheiranthoides Streptanthus heterophyllus Eruca vesicaria Brassicaceae sp Brassicaceae sp Streptanthus arizonicus Myagrum perfoliatum Sisymbrium leucocladum Isatis lusitanica Isatis tinctoria Teesdalia nudicaulis Isatis lusitanica Diptychocarpus strictus Myagrum perfoliatum Chorispora tenella Thlaspi arvense Aethionema arabicum Cochlearia officinalis Cochlearia officinalis Teesdalia nudicaulis Streptanthus arizonicus Schizopetalum walkeri Sisymbrium leucocladum Lunaria annua Hesperis matronalis Euclidium syriacum Physaria acutifolia Matthiola longipetala Matthiola longipetala Hesperis matronalis Cakile maritima Diptychocarpus strictus Thlaspi arvense Chorispora tenella Schizopetalum walkeri Aethionema arabicum Lunaria annua B Gynandropsis gynandra Gynandropsis gynandra Tarenaya hassleriana Tarenaya hassleriana Cleomaceae sp Cleomaceae sp Melidiscus giganteus Polanisia sp Arivela viscosa Polanisia graveolens Coalisina angustifolia Polanisia dodecandra Coalisina paradoxa Polanisia trachysperma Polanisia sp Arivela viscosa Polanisia graveolens Coalisina angustifolia Polanisia dodecandra Melidiscus giganteus Polanisia trachysperma Coalisina paradoxa Cleome violacea Cleome violacea Cleome arabica Cleome arabica Cleome africana Cleome africana C Capparaceae sp Capparaceae sp Capparis fascicularis Capparis fascicularis Boscia sp Cadaba natalensis Cadaba natalensis Boscia sp Supplemental Figure 3. Comparison of phylogenetic relationships in the ASTRAL tree obtained from transcriptome data (black) and based on hierarchical clustering of TE abundances (red) in (A) Brassicaceae, (B) Cleomaceae, and (C) Capparaceae. Supplemental Table 1. Taxon sampling with genome size, chromosome counts, and repetitive element abundance. Chromosome counts as in http://legacy.tropicos.org/Project/IPCN. Asterisks (*) indicate samples with known ploidy level. ltr - on on L1 hAT RTE Copia (Mbp) Gypsy RandI RTEX MuDR Family Species Novosib other ltr ltr other Helitron Penelope count (n) Total_RE Harbinger other DNA other transposon Genome Size Size Genome other non other SINE2/tRNA Chromosome Chromosome retrotranspos retrotranspos Bataceae 356.97 11 0.0734 0.1192 0.0058 0.0138 0.0571 0.0075 0.0625 1.38E-02 4.17E-04 0.00E+00 8.34E-04 0.00E+00 4.17E-04 8.34E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.3556 Batis maritima Brassicaceae 933.99 11 0.1557 0.1632 0.0129 0.0235 0.0811 0.0163 0.115 1.23E-02 1.36E-02 4.04E-04 2.16E-03 2.70E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.5964 Aethionema arabicum* Brassicaceae 899.76 0.0997 0.1382 0.0098 0.0132 0.0581 0.0049 0.0768 7.48E-03 1.23E-03 3.79E-04 5.68E-04 0.00E+00 9.47E-05 2.84E-04 9.47E-05 0.00E+00 0.4107 Meniocus linifolius Brassicaceae 268.95 8 0.1068 0.2629 0.0124 0.0218 0.0637 0.0073 0.0491 1.13E-02 3.59E-03 7.98E-05 5.59E-04 1.92E-03 0.00E+00 3.19E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.5417 Barbarea bracteosa Brassicaceae 1383.87 9 0.1463 0.3109 0.0133 0.0082 0.0225 0.0101 0.0444 1.03E-02 1.33E-03 0.00E+00 6.66E-04 1.38E-02 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.5817 Cakile maritima* Brassicaceae 254.28 14 0.0957 0.2056 0.0104 0.0213 0.0483 0.0095 0.0471 1.57E-02 2.97E-03 6.20E-04 2.48E-04 3.72E-03 0.00E+00 2.48E-04 1.24E-04 0.00E+00 0.4617 Calepina irregularis Brassicaceae 420.54 8,16 0.1275 0.1617 0.0116 0.0218 0.0571 0.0122 0.0631 2.27E-02 7.04E-03 8.80E-04 6.40E-04 1.84E-03 3.20E-04 8.00E-04 1.60E-04 0.00E+00 0.4893 Capsella bursa-pastoris Brassicaceae 489 7,8 0.0911 0.1797 0.0145 0.0153 0.0953 0.0036 0.0608 9.44E-03 1.42E-03 3.78E-04 2.83E-04 4.72E-04 0.00E+00 7.55E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.4731 Cardamine hirsuta Brassicaceae 484.11 0.1521 0.1708 0.0084 0.0146 0.0362 0.0074 0.0549 7.60E-03 1.36E-03 3.90E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 9.74E-05 5.84E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.4544 Caulanthus amplexicaulis* Brassicaceae 366.75 7 0.174 0.1702 0.0126 0.0175 0.0471 0.0167 0.0578 7.26E-03 3.98E-03 6.96E-04 2.59E-03 8.95E-04 9.94E-05 3.98E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.5118 Chorispora tenella Brassicaceae 734 12 0.1941 0.231 0.009 0.0271 0.0615 0.0082 0.0707 1.32E-02 1.12E-03 3.75E-04 2.50E-04 0.00E+00 5.00E-04 9.99E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.6181 Cochlearia offcinalis Brassicaceae 660.15 15,30 0.1942 0.1496 0.0099 0.0126 0.0362 0.0053 0.0513 9.91E-03 5.08E-04 2.54E-04 2.54E-04 4.49E-03 0.00E+00 1.69E-04 8.47E-05 0.00E+00 0.4749 Crambe hispanica* Brassicaceae 371.64 7 0.1866 0.1963 0.0069 0.0124 0.0356 0.0056 0.0383 5.44E-03 4.57E-03 3.89E-04 1.36E-03 9.72E-05 9.72E-05 2.91E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.4939 Descurainia pinnata* Brassicaceae 195.6 7,14 0.175 0.1532 0.0096 0.014 0.0897 0.0045 0.0412 6.16E-03 2.22E-03 1.01E-04 1.01E-03 3.03E-04 0.00E+00 1.01E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.4973 Descurainia sophioides* Brassicaceae 557.46 7 0.1625 0.1509 0.0106 0.0168 0.1085 0.0051 0.0385 1.05E-02 4.98E-03 4.24E-04 4.24E-04 3.18E-04 1.06E-04 3.18E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.5101 Diptychocarpus strictus* Brassicaceae 709.05 11 0.1464 0.2511 0.012 0.008 0.0465 0.0053 0.0529 5.58E-03 4.04E-04 2.42E-04 0.00E+00 5.33E-03 1.62E-04 3.23E-04 1.62E-04 0.00E+00 0.5345 Eruca vesicaria* Brassicaceae 420.54 8 0.1424 0.2372 0.0056 0.0196 0.041 0.0093 0.0274 1.84E-02 7.27E-03 2.32E-03 1.83E-04 5.01E-03 2.44E-04 3.05E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.5164 Erysimum cheiranthoides Brassicaceae 298.29 7 0.1686 0.1255 0.0105 0.014 0.0591 0.0027 0.0554 7.99E-03 2.00E-03 5.26E-04 4.20E-04 1.05E-04 4.20E-04 4.20E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.4477 Euclidium syriacum* Brassicaceae 2004.9 24 0.142 0.1715 0.0101 0.0155 0.0753 0.0067 0.0471 6.58E-03 2.55E-03 8.22E-05 2.47E-04 8.22E-04 8.22E-05 3.29E-04 8.22E-05 0.00E+00 0.479 Farsetia aegyptica Brassicaceae 547.68 14 0.0885 0.2542 0.0076 0.0168 0.0314 0.0072 0.0382 1.14E-02 4.31E-03 1.96E-04 1.96E-04 2.06E-03 2.94E-04 4.89E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.463 Goldbachia laevigata Brassicaceae 621.03 0.0908 0.0997 0.0116 0.0153 0.0846 0.0066 0.06 8.36E-03 1.38E-03 2.30E-04 1.53E-04 0.00E+00 1.53E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.3788 Guillenia lasiophylla Brassicaceae 3261.63 7 0.395 0.1763 0.0056 0.0097 0.0321 0.0038 0.0354 4.32E-03 4.75E-03 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 7.38E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.6677 Hesperis matronalis Brassicaceae 552.57 7 0.1222 0.1947 0.0072 0.0107 0.0505 0.0056 0.0616 6.36E-03 1.47E-03 4.71E-04 5.89E-05 4.59E-03 0.00E+00 1.18E-04 5.89E-05 0.00E+00 0.4655 Hirschefeldia incana Brassicaceae 831.3 7 0.1167 0.1951 0.0173 0.014 0.0897 0.0046
Recommended publications
  • Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report
    Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 626 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.599.4300 www.esassoc.com Oakland Olympia Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Diego San Francisco Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills D210324 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery, and Storage Project: Rare Plant Survey Report Page Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................2 Objective .......................................................................................................................... 2 Project Location and Description .....................................................................................2 Setting ................................................................................................................................... 5 Climate ............................................................................................................................. 5 Topography and Soils ......................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Phytochemical Profile and Antioxidant Activity of the Aerial Part Extracts from Matthiola Incana Subsp
    DOI: 10.1002/cbdv.202100167 FULL PAPER Phytochemical Profile and Antioxidant Activity of the Aerial Part Extracts from Matthiola incana subsp. rupestris and subsp. pulchella (Brassicaceae) Endemic to Sicily Natalizia Miceli,*a Emilia Cavò,a, b Vivienne Spadaro,c Francesco Maria Raimondo,d Salvatore Ragusa,e Francesco Cacciola,f Yassine Oulad El Majdoub,a Katia Arena,a Luigi Mondello,a, g, h, i Concetta Condurso,j Fabrizio Cincotta,j and Maria Fernanda Tavianoa a Department of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences, University of Messina, Viale Palatucci, 98168 Messina, Italy, e-mail: [email protected] b Foundation ‘Prof. Antonio Imbesi’, University of Messina, Piazza Pugliatti 1, 98122 Messina, Italy, c Department STEBICEF/Section of Botany, Anthropology and Zoology, University of Palermo, Via Archirafi 38, 90123 Palermo, Italy, d PLANTA/Research, Documentation and Training Center, Via Serraglio Vecchio 28, 90123 Palermo, Italy, e Department of Health Sciences, University ‘Magna Graecia’ of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, Località Germaneto, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy, f Department of Biomedical, Dental, Morphological and Functional Imaging Sciences, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 98125 Messina, Italy, g Chromaleont s.r.l., c/o Department of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences, University of Messina, Viale Palatucci, 98168 Messina, Italy, h BeSep s.r.l., c/o Department of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences, University of Messina, Viale Palatucci, 98168 Messina, Italy, i Department of Sciences and Technologies for Human and Environment, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, via Àlvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Rome, Italy, j Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, Viale Palatucci, 98168 Messina, Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Europe's Threatened Plants
    Conserving Europe’s threatened plants Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Conserving Europe’s threatened plants Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation By Suzanne Sharrock and Meirion Jones May 2009 Recommended citation: Sharrock, S. and Jones, M., 2009. Conserving Europe’s threatened plants: Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Botanic Gardens Conservation International, Richmond, UK ISBN 978-1-905164-30-1 Published by Botanic Gardens Conservation International Descanso House, 199 Kew Road, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3BW, UK Design: John Morgan, [email protected] Acknowledgements The work of establishing a consolidated list of threatened Photo credits European plants was first initiated by Hugh Synge who developed the original database on which this report is based. All images are credited to BGCI with the exceptions of: We are most grateful to Hugh for providing this database to page 5, Nikos Krigas; page 8. Christophe Libert; page 10, BGCI and advising on further development of the list. The Pawel Kos; page 12 (upper), Nikos Krigas; page 14: James exacting task of inputting data from national Red Lists was Hitchmough; page 16 (lower), Jože Bavcon; page 17 (upper), carried out by Chris Cockel and without his dedicated work, the Nkos Krigas; page 20 (upper), Anca Sarbu; page 21, Nikos list would not have been completed. Thank you for your efforts Krigas; page 22 (upper) Simon Williams; page 22 (lower), RBG Chris. We are grateful to all the members of the European Kew; page 23 (upper), Jo Packet; page 23 (lower), Sandrine Botanic Gardens Consortium and other colleagues from Europe Godefroid; page 24 (upper) Jože Bavcon; page 24 (lower), Frank who provided essential advice, guidance and supplementary Scumacher; page 25 (upper) Michael Burkart; page 25, (lower) information on the species included in the database.
    [Show full text]
  • Shell Creek Checklist-Apr2012
    Checklist of Vascular Plants Shell Creek and Vicinity April 2012 Avenales Wildlife Area, Sinton Ranch, San Luis Obispo County, California PREPARED BY DAVID J. KEIL, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES DEPARTMENT, CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY, SAN LUIS OBISPO Scientific name1,2 Common name FAMILY Abronia pogonantha Desert sand-verbena NYCTAGINACEAE Achillea millefolium Yarrow ASTERACEAE Achyrachaena mollis Blow wives ASTERACEAE Acmispon americanus (Lotus purshianus) Spanish-clover FABACEAE Acmispon brachycarpus (Lotus humistratus) Foothill deervetch FABACEAE Acmispon glaber (Lotus scoparius) Deerweed FABACEAE Acmispon strigosus (Lotus strigosus) Strigose deervetch FABACEAE Acmispon wrangelianus California deervetch FABACEAE Acourtia microcephala Sacapelote ASTERACEAE Adenostoma fasciculatum Chamise ROSACEAE Agoseris heterophylla Annual mountain dandelion ASTERACEAE *Amaranthus albus3 Tumble amaranth AMARANTHACEAE *Amaranthus retroflexus Redroot amaranth AMARANTHACEAE Ambrosia acanthicarpa Annual bursage ASTERACEAE Amsinckia menziesii subsp. intermedia Fiddleneck BORAGINACEAE Amsinckia tessellata subsp. gloriosa Fiddleneck BORAGINACEAE Amsinckia tessellata subsp. tessellata Fiddleneck BORAGINACEAE *Anagallis arvensis Scarlet pimpernel MYRSINACEAE Ancistrocarphus filagineus Woolly fishhooks ASTERACEAE Apiastrum angustifolium Apiastrum APIACEAE Arctostaphylos glauca Bigberry manzanita ERICACEAE Artemisia californica California sagebrush ASTERACEAE Artemisia douglasiana Mugwort ASTERACEAE Asclepias fascicularis Milkweed APOCYNACEAE Asclepias vestita
    [Show full text]
  • The Flora of Guadalupe Island, Mexico
    qQ 11 C17X NH THE FLORA OF GUADALUPE ISLAND, MEXICO By Reid Moran Published by the California Academy of Sciences San Francisco, California Memoirs of the California Academy of Sciences, Number 19 The pride of Guadalupe Island, the endemic Cisfuiillw giiailulupensis. flowering on a small islet off the southwest coast, with cliffs of the main island as a background; 19 April 1957. This plant is rare on the main island, surviving only on cliffs out of reach of goats, but common here on sjoatless Islote Nccro. THE FLORA OF GUADALUPE ISLAND, MEXICO Q ^ THE FLORA OF GUADALUPE ISLAND, MEXICO By Reid Moran y Published by the California Academy of Sciences San Francisco, California Memoirs of the California Academy of Sciences, Number 19 San Francisco July 26, 1996 SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS COMMITTEE: Alan E. Lcviton. Ediinr Katie Martin, Managing Editor Thomas F. Daniel Michael Ghiselin Robert C. Diewes Wojciech .1. Pulawski Adam Schift" Gary C. Williams © 1906 by the California Academy of Sciences, Golden (iate Park. San Francisco, California 94118 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any infcMination storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 96-084362 ISBN 0-940228-40-8 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract vii Resumen viii Introduction 1 Guadalupe Island Description I Place names 9 Climate 13 History 15 Other Biota 15 The Vascular Plants Native
    [Show full text]
  • I Pathotypes of Plasmodiophora Brassicae from Clubroot Resistant
    Pathotypes of Plasmodiophora brassicae from clubroot resistant canola and assessment of amisulbrom for clubroot control By Keisha Hollman A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science In Plant Science Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science University of Alberta ©Keisha Hollman, 2021 i Abstract Clubroot, caused by Plasmodiophora brassicae Woronin, is an important soilborne disease of canola (oilseed rape; Brassica napus L.). In Canada, clubroot management relies heavily on the planting of resistant cultivars, but since 2013, resistance has been broken in an increasing number of fields. Prior to the introduction of resistance, P. brassicae pathotype 3H, as defined on the Canadian Clubroot Differential (CCD) set, was predominant in Alberta. In testing of pathogen collections from 2014-2016, however, pathotype 3A was most common, indicating rapid shifts in the pathogen population. Up-to-date knowledge of pathotype composition is important for effective resistance breeding and stewardship. Furthermore, strategies to supplement resistance, such as the application of fungicides, may also contribute to sustainable clubroot management. In this thesis, isolates of P. brassicae were obtained from 166 canola crops in Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba, and evaluated for pathotype designation on the CCD set and the differentials of Somé et al. Seventeen pathotypes were detected on the CCD set, including the previously reported pathotypes 3A, 3D, 3H, 5L, 5X, 8E, 8N and 8P, plus the novel pathotypes 2C, 6D, 8D, 9A, 9B, 9C, 11A, 13A and 13B. Five pathotypes were identified on the hosts of Somé et al. including P1, P2, P3, P4 and P5, with P4 and P5 reported here from Canada for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • Isatis Tinctoria L. (Woad): a Review of Its Botany, Ethnobotanical Uses, Phytochemistry, Biological Activities, and Biotechnological Studies
    plants Review Isatis tinctoria L. (Woad): A Review of Its Botany, Ethnobotanical Uses, Phytochemistry, Biological Activities, and Biotechnological Studies Jasmine Speranza 1,2, Natalizia Miceli 2,*, Maria Fernanda Taviano 2 , Salvatore Ragusa 3 , Inga Kwiecie ´n 4, Agnieszka Szopa 4 and Halina Ekiert 4 1 Foundation “Prof. Antonio Imbesi”, University of Messina, Piazza Pugliatti 1, 98122 Messina, Italy; [email protected] 2 Department of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences, University of Messina, Viale Palatucci, 98168 Messina, Italy; [email protected] 3 Department of Health Sciences, University ‘Magna Graecia’ of Catanzaro, V. Europa, IT-88100 Catanzaro, Italy; [email protected] 4 Chair and Department of Pharmaceutical Botany, Jagiellonian University, Medical College, Medyczna 9, 30-688 Kraków, Poland; [email protected] (I.K.); [email protected] (A.S.); [email protected] (H.E.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 10 February 2020; Accepted: 25 February 2020; Published: 1 March 2020 Abstract: Isatis tinctoria L. (Brassicaceae), which is commonly known as woad, is a species with an ancient and well-documented history as an indigo dye and medicinal plant. Currently, I. tinctoria is utilized more often as medicinal remedy and also as a cosmetic ingredient. In 2011, I. tinctoria root was accepted in the official European phytotherapy by introducing its monograph in the European Pharmacopoeia. The biological properties of raw material have been known from Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM). Over recent decades, I. tinctoria has been investigated both from a phytochemical and a biological point of view. The modern in vitro and in vivo scientific studies proved anti-inflammatory, anti-tumour, antimicrobial, antiviral, analgesic, and antioxidant activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora Mediterranea 26
    FLORA MEDITERRANEA 26 Published under the auspices of OPTIMA by the Herbarium Mediterraneum Panormitanum Palermo – 2016 FLORA MEDITERRANEA Edited on behalf of the International Foundation pro Herbario Mediterraneo by Francesco M. Raimondo, Werner Greuter & Gianniantonio Domina Editorial board G. Domina (Palermo), F. Garbari (Pisa), W. Greuter (Berlin), S. L. Jury (Reading), G. Kamari (Patras), P. Mazzola (Palermo), S. Pignatti (Roma), F. M. Raimondo (Palermo), C. Salmeri (Palermo), B. Valdés (Sevilla), G. Venturella (Palermo). Advisory Committee P. V. Arrigoni (Firenze) P. Küpfer (Neuchatel) H. M. Burdet (Genève) J. Mathez (Montpellier) A. Carapezza (Palermo) G. Moggi (Firenze) C. D. K. Cook (Zurich) E. Nardi (Firenze) R. Courtecuisse (Lille) P. L. Nimis (Trieste) V. Demoulin (Liège) D. Phitos (Patras) F. Ehrendorfer (Wien) L. Poldini (Trieste) M. Erben (Munchen) R. M. Ros Espín (Murcia) G. Giaccone (Catania) A. Strid (Copenhagen) V. H. Heywood (Reading) B. Zimmer (Berlin) Editorial Office Editorial assistance: A. M. Mannino Editorial secretariat: V. Spadaro & P. Campisi Layout & Tecnical editing: E. Di Gristina & F. La Sorte Design: V. Magro & L. C. Raimondo Redazione di "Flora Mediterranea" Herbarium Mediterraneum Panormitanum, Università di Palermo Via Lincoln, 2 I-90133 Palermo, Italy [email protected] Printed by Luxograph s.r.l., Piazza Bartolomeo da Messina, 2/E - Palermo Registration at Tribunale di Palermo, no. 27 of 12 July 1991 ISSN: 1120-4052 printed, 2240-4538 online DOI: 10.7320/FlMedit26.001 Copyright © by International Foundation pro Herbario Mediterraneo, Palermo Contents V. Hugonnot & L. Chavoutier: A modern record of one of the rarest European mosses, Ptychomitrium incurvum (Ptychomitriaceae), in Eastern Pyrenees, France . 5 P. Chène, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Baja California, Mexico, and a Vegetation Map of Colonet Mesa Alan B
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 29 | Issue 1 Article 4 2011 Plants of the Colonet Region, Baja California, Mexico, and a Vegetation Map of Colonet Mesa Alan B. Harper Terra Peninsular, Coronado, California Sula Vanderplank Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, California Mark Dodero Recon Environmental Inc., San Diego, California Sergio Mata Terra Peninsular, Coronado, California Jorge Ochoa Long Beach City College, Long Beach, California Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Botany Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Harper, Alan B.; Vanderplank, Sula; Dodero, Mark; Mata, Sergio; and Ochoa, Jorge (2011) "Plants of the Colonet Region, Baja California, Mexico, and a Vegetation Map of Colonet Mesa," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 29: Iss. 1, Article 4. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol29/iss1/4 Aliso, 29(1), pp. 25–42 ’ 2011, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden PLANTS OF THE COLONET REGION, BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO, AND A VEGETATION MAPOF COLONET MESA ALAN B. HARPER,1 SULA VANDERPLANK,2 MARK DODERO,3 SERGIO MATA,1 AND JORGE OCHOA4 1Terra Peninsular, A.C., PMB 189003, Suite 88, Coronado, California 92178, USA ([email protected]); 2Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, 1500 North College Avenue, Claremont, California 91711, USA; 3Recon Environmental Inc., 1927 Fifth Avenue, San Diego, California 92101, USA; 4Long Beach City College, 1305 East Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach, California 90806, USA ABSTRACT The Colonet region is located at the southern end of the California Floristic Province, in an area known to have the highest plant diversity in Baja California.
    [Show full text]
  • Seed-Coat Microsculpturing and Its Systematic Application in Isatis (Brassicaceae) and Allied Genera in Iran Hamid Moazzenia, Shahin Zarrea,Ã, Ihsan A
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Flora ] (]]]]) ]]]–]]] www.elsevier.de/flora Seed-coat microsculpturing and its systematic application in Isatis (Brassicaceae) and allied genera in Iran Hamid Moazzenia, Shahin Zarrea,Ã, Ihsan A. Al-Shehbazb, Klaus Mummenhoffc aDepartment of Botany, School of Biology, University College of Science, University of Tehran, P.O. Box 14155-6455, Tehran, Iran bMissouri Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, MO 63166-0299, USA cUniversita¨t Osnabru¨ck, Spezielle Botanik, Barbarastrasse 11, 49076 Osnabru¨ck, Germany Received 2 June 2006; accepted 19 October 2006 Abstract In order to examine the systematic application of seed-coat microsculpturing in Isatis, seed surfaces of 23 species (41 populations) in four genera of tribe Isatideae were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Eight types of basic ornamentation patterns were recognized among the studied specimens. Of these, the reticulate–areolate type was the most common and was found in the genera Isatis, Pachypterygium, Samerari and Tauscheria and 15 species (e.g., I. cappodocica, I. kotschyana and I. tinctoria). The reticulate type, the second most frequent, occurred in 7 species while other types each were represented by only one or 2 species. Although different populations of a given species show similar seed-surface sculpturing in most cases, in some polymorphic species like I. cappadocica and I. kotschyana these patterns were variable among populations. To some extent the variation corresponds to infraspecific taxa for some species, but the differences are not significant enough to be useful in the delimitation of the subspecies recognized by previous workers. Moreover, seed-coat characters do not support the separation of genera Isatis, Pachypterygium, Sameraria and Tauscheria.
    [Show full text]