The Visigoths Enter Gaul on 24 April 410, Alaric I Led the Visigoth Army to the Outskirts of Rome

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Visigoths Enter Gaul on 24 April 410, Alaric I Led the Visigoth Army to the Outskirts of Rome VISIGOTHS, KINGS OF TOULOUSE In 419, the Visigoths settled in south-western Gaul upon a decision by the Western Roman Empire, on a territory chosen by the Emperor Honorius and his patrician Constance. Toulouse was their royal residence. Over the course of time and the growing independence of the Goths, it became the capital of a kingdom often referred to by historians as the Kingdom of Toulouse. In the space of almost a century, the Visigoth kings established a dynasty and extended their authority from the Loire to the south of Spain, thereby establishing one of the first Barbarian kingdoms in the West. This kingdom came to an end in the south-west at the start of the 6th century, following the death of Alaric II in 507. If all these events are relatively well known thanks to contemporary Latin authors, the material traces of a Germanic presence in our region were believed to be minimal. However, the recent discoveries brought to light in the south- west now contradict this belief. The 1,600th anniversary of the settling of the Visigoths in Toulouse is a great opportunity for the Musée Saint-Raymond, Toulouse’s Archaeology Museum, to present to the public a part of its history that is often overlooked, by focusing the subject of the exhibition on the capital Tolosa and its territory in the 5th century. In connection with written sources, the exhibit will present the results of archaeological research, including some of the most recent and as of yet, unpublished campaigns. It will explore the origin of the Visigoths and the Roman context in which they lived during the last days of the Roman Empire, as well as the material culture typical of this people and specific customs known for the most part thanks to mortuary archaeology. 2 3 THE VISIGOTH, A BARBARIAN LIKE THE OTHERS? “During the reign of the emperors, Toulouse was decorated with the name of colony and its Duumvirs erected sumptuous monuments […]. However, those days of glory and peace passed quickly. The north regurgitated its savage hordes, the empire was destroyed and the Goths, victors over the King’s People, established the seat of their authority in this city. Therefore, everything that once bore the imprint of good taste, or was connected to Roman domination, was shattered by the club of ignorance […].” Jean-Paul Lucas, Catalogue du Musée de Toulouse, 1806 This rather harsh judgment by Jean-Paul Lucas, curator of the Musée de Toulouse at the beginning of the 19th century, perfectly illustrates the dual difficulty faced by the Visigoths. Firstly, because they belonged to the so-called “Barbarian” peoples, their history has remained in the shadow of the Roman Empire, a model of civilization, of which they are believed to have brought about the downfall. Secondly, because they were not the Franks, the heroes of the national novel, the Visigoths were long ignored by so-called “Merovingian” archaeology (relating to Mérovée, the mythical ancestor of Clovis). In Spain, where they are celebrated as the founders of the nation, their existence has long been a subject of study by researchers. Over the centuries, many artists have made use of the figure of the “Barbarian” and the Visigoth. They can be found in painting, sculpture, literature, comics, audio-visual productions, advertising and even video games. However, they are usually represented in the same stereotypical fashion: 2 3 brutal, bestial figures, surviving by means of plundering and destruction. The adjective “Gothic” which refers to a well-known medieval architectural style is a Renaissance creation. In contrast to “Romanesque” art, considered more ancient and therefore nobler, this term was coined to denigrate the medieval style by giving it a “barbaric” origin. In turn, the medieval and romantic counter-culture movement known as “Gothic” in the late 1970s also borrowed its name. These pictures are obviously a far from faithful representation of the Visigoths. The term “Barbarians” actually refers to an ensemble of ancient peoples speaking neither Latin nor Greek, living in Western Europe in the Barbaricum, i.e., beyond the Roman borders of the Rhine and the Danube. The Goths belonged to the same linguistic group as the Eastern Germanic peoples (tribes originally located between the Elbe and the Vistula) with notably the Vandals, Burgundians and the Gepids. The Franks belonged to the group of so-called Western Germanic peoples (between the Rhine and the Elbe). Although there was no political unity and even less a “Germanic race” on an anthropological level, these peoples shared some cultural traits at the beginning of their history: polytheistic pantheon, aristocratic and warrior values, as well as the placing of mortuary items or artefacts in their tombs. 4 5 WHERE DO THE GOTHS COME FROM? The Goths were first mentioned in the 1st century AD by Roman authors who located them in the north of present-day Poland. Nothing is known of their older origins, but according to a legend reported by Jordanes (6th century), a small group, guided by King Berig, is believed to have left Scandinavia on board several ships to settle in new territory. The myth however, may contain a grain of truth in terms of the actual archaeological reality: to the west of the mouth of the river Vistula (Poland), archaeologists have discovered tombs whose architecture in stone mounds is identical to those known in southern Sweden, Norway and the Gotland Islands. These tombs may bear witness to the integration of Scandinavian Germanic tribes into indigenous populations in northern Poland during the first century AD. The Goths may have been born from this fusion, along with the associated archaeological culture known as Wielbark. JORDANES AND THE HISTORY OF THE GOTHS In the 550s, Jordanes, himself a Goth, wrote a work called Getica (History of the Goths). This was a summary of the work, now lost, of his contemporary Cassiodorus. Combining legends and historical fact, this work is the oldest account of the history of the Goths, from their origins to the mid-6th century. 4 5 THE GOTHS AND WIELBARK CULTURE The archaeological culture of Wielbark developed in the Vistula basin from the 1st century AD onwards and takes its name from a Polish village where a cemetery with over 3,000 graves was discovered. Wielbark culture is common to several Germanic ethnicities. The homogeneity of practices and artefacts does not allow researchers to differentiate one group from the other, but written Roman sources suggest that the Goths occupied an important place within this mosaic of populations. The Goths from the Wielbark territory bordered the Baltic Sea and the Slavs in the east, and other Germanic groups to the west and south. They controlled part of the Amber Road and maintained commercial relations with the Roman Empire. Life was organized in open villages where livestock farming, agriculture, and various craft activities were practised, as well as the extraction of iron. Funeral rites involved both cremation and burial, and various items were placed in graves to accompany the deceased. 6 7 THE GOTHS ON THE SHORES OF THE BLACK SEA Between the end of the 2nd century and start of the 3rd century, carriers of the Wielbark culture left the Vistula basin to head south. We can follow these movements, over a generation or so, via the dissemination of typical archaeological objects and sites. This was the beginning of a great Gothic migration, which took place, according to Jordanes, under King Filimer. This journey took the Goths to the shores of the Black Sea, the Scythia of ancient authors (current-day Ukraine), but also to the plains of Moldova and Romania, on the banks of the Danube, on the borders of the Roman Empire. There, the Goths formed alliances with other groups (Gepids, Herules, Carps, Dacians, Alans, Sarmatians, etc.) and formed a veritable coalition who, from 238 onwards, launched repeated attacks on the Roman provinces. The material culture that corresponds to this period is called Chernyakhov. Very homogeneous, it can be attributed both to the Goths and their allies. GOTHS = OSTROGOTHS + VISIGOTHS It was in the third century that, for the first time, two branches of the Goths were mentioned in written sources: the Greuthungi-Ostrogoths (in Ukraine) and the Tervinges- Visigoths (in Romania and Moldova). Cassiodorus and Jordanes translated Ostrogoths by “Goths of the East” and Visigoths by “Goths of the West”. However, for other authors, the name Visigoth is linked to the adjective “weis” or “wiss” meaning “informed, educated”. In other words, the Visigoths were the “wise, educated Goths”, while the Ostrogoths were the “brilliant Goths”. 6 7 GOTHS AND RELIGION In the first centuries of their history, the Goths practised a polytheistic religion. It was when they settled on the banks of the Danube (in the Roman province of Dacia) that the Visigoths were Christianized by the bishop Ulfilas, circa 340. Ulfilas practised a variant of Christianity: Arianism. Thus, the Visigoths were Arians. According to this doctrine, forged by the priest Arius (256-336), Christ did not have the same nature as God. God was uncreated and eternal while Christ was created and did not have the same degree of divinity (he was subordinate to the Father). Arianism was considered heresy by other Christians, especially after the Council of Nicaea (in present-day Turkey), organized in 325 at the instigation of the Emperor Constantine. ULFILAS Originally from a Roman Christian family captured by the Goths, Ulfilas is believed to have grown up amongst Barbarians whose language he mastered. In 341, he became the bishop of Gothia (the lands occupied by the Goths). He had a great cultural influence on his adopted people. For example, he translated the Bible into the Gothic language using an alphabet combining Greek, Latin and runic characters.
Recommended publications
  • Roman-Barbarian Marriages in the Late Empire R.C
    ROMAN-BARBARIAN MARRIAGES IN THE LATE EMPIRE R.C. Blockley In 1964 Rosario Soraci published a study of conubia between Romans and Germans from the fourth to the sixth century A.D.1 Although the title of the work might suggest that its concern was to be with such marriages through- out the period, in fact its aim was much more restricted. Beginning with a law issued by Valentinian I in 370 or 373 to the magister equitum Theodosius (C.Th. 3.14.1), which banned on pain of death all marriages between Roman pro- vincials and barbarae or gentiles, Soraci, after assessing the context and intent of the law, proceeded to discuss its influence upon the practices of the Germanic kingdoms which succeeded the Roman Empire in the West. The text of the law reads: Nulli provineialium, cuiuscumque ordinis aut loci fuerit, cum bar- bara sit uxore coniugium, nec ulli gentilium provinciales femina copuletur. Quod si quae inter provinciales atque gentiles adfinitates ex huiusmodi nuptiis extiterit, quod in his suspectum vel noxium detegitur, capitaliter expietur. This was regarded by Soraci not as a general banning law but rather as a lim- ited attempt, in the context of current hostilities with the Alamanni, to keep those barbarians serving the Empire (gentiles)isolated from the general Roman 2 populace. The German lawmakers, however, exemplified by Alaric in his 63 64 interpretatio,3 took it as a general banning law and applied it in this spir- it, so that it became the basis for the prohibition under the Germanic king- doms of intermarriage between Romans and Germans.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisions for 2016 Catalog
    Revisions for 2016 Catalog 1. October 3, 2016 – Trim – Page 56: Added 270CR – Replacement Rubber Tip 2. October 3, 2016 – Trim – Page 42: Door Protection Plates – changed 220S diamond tread to (diamond tread available on in US26 only) 3. October 3, 2016 – Trim – Page 25: added (compatible with 1-3/4” doors only) to 27N Fasteners 4. October 3, 2016 – Trim – Page 83: Changed 334V image 5. October 3, 2016 – Trim – Page 83: Changed 334V Fasteners bullets to read: • Two (2) #8 finish washers; • Two (2) 7-32 x 1-7/8” OHMS for 1-5/8” doors; • Two (2) 7-32 x 2” OHMS for 1-3/4” doors. 6. October 3, 2016 – Trim – Page 83: Added 334V Engraving: Available up to four characters. 7. October 3, 2016 – Trim – Page 83: Added 322V Engraving: Available up to four characters. 8. October 3, 2016 – Electrified Solutions: Added touchless actuators 2-659-03707 and 2-659- 3708 to page 76 9. October 3, 2016 – Electrified Solutions: Added touchless actuators 2-659-03707 and 2-659- 3708 images to page 53 10. October 4, 2016- General Information: Changed address under Montgomery DC from 200 County Court Lane, Montgomery, AL 36105 to 200 County Court, Montgomery, AL 36105 11. October 4, 2016 – Locks: changed last sentence on page 1 in the introductory paragraph 12. October 5, 2016 – T&W: removed all brass finishes (MIB) from product line and removed verbiage, “brass thresholds are supplied with brass screws.” Pages included: 2, 3 (General Information), 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18, 26, 29, 35 and 38 13.
    [Show full text]
  • GPSMAP® 400/500 Series Owner’S Manual © 2009 Garmin Ltd
    GPSMAP® 400/500 series owner’s manual © 2009 Garmin Ltd. or its subsidiaries Garmin International, Inc. Garmin (Europe) Ltd. Garmin Corporation 1200 East 151st Street, Liberty House No. 68, Jangshu 2nd Road, Olathe, Kansas 66062, USA Hounsdown Business Park, Shijr, Taipei County, Taiwan Tel. (913) 397.8200 or (800) 800.1020 Southampton, Hampshire, SO40 9LR UK Tel. 886/2.2642.9199 Fax (913) 397.8282 Tel. +44 (0) 870.8501241 (outside the UK) Fax 886/2.2642.9099 0808 2380000 (within the UK) Fax +44 (0) 870.8501251 All rights reserved. Except as expressly provided herein, no part of this manual may be reproduced, copied, transmitted, disseminated, downloaded or stored in any storage medium, for any purpose without the express prior written consent of Garmin. Garmin hereby grants permission to download a single copy of this manual onto a hard drive or other electronic storage medium to be viewed and to print one copy of this manual or of any revision hereto, provided that such electronic or printed copy of this manual must contain the complete text of this copyright notice and provided further that any unauthorized commercial distribution of this manual or any revision hereto is strictly prohibited. Information in this document is subject to change without notice. Garmin reserves the right to change or improve its products and to make changes in the content without obligation to notify any person or organization of such changes or improvements. Visit the Garmin Web site (www.garmin.com) for current updates and supplemental information concerning the use and operation of this and other Garmin products.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTINUITY and CHANGE in the EIGHTH CENTURY Conciliar
    CHAPTER 6 CONTINUITY AND CHANGE IN THE EIGHTH CENTURY Conciliar Continuity: Alaric to Clovis In September 506, thirty-four Gallo-Roman clerics met in the city of Agde “with the permission of our most glorious, magnifi cent, and pious lord king.”1 Th e honored rex was Alaric II, an Arian Christian, who hoped that by authorizing a council of Catholic prelates, he would be able to rely on their loyalty in the ongoing fi ght for political domina- tion in Gaul.2 Alaric’s dream of a Visigothic-dominated Gaul would be crushed only a year later, when he was defeated and killed by Clovis at the Battle of Vouillé.3 But in 506, the king was still vigorously attempt- ing to hold together a unifi ed Visigothic realm. Th e same year that he convoked the Council of Agde, he also issued the Lex Romana Visig- othorum (or Breviarium), a compilation of Roman law whose infl uence would far outlive Alaric himself.4 Following Clovis’ victory, and the establishment of Merovingian dominance in Gaul, the Lex Romana Visigothorum continued to be copied and consulted frequently, even though manuscripts of the Codex Th eodosianus were still in circula- tion.5 For Alaric, however, the codifi cation project had a more imme- diate aim: uniting the Roman subjects of his kingdom under a single code of laws issued in his own name. Alaric’s unifi cation eff orts were 1 Agde (506), Preface. 2 Mathisen, “Th e Second Council of Arles,” 543, has suggested that Arles II (442/506) was convoked for the same reasons already postulated for the Council of Agde (506).
    [Show full text]
  • Bvm6612m(S)-Hc-Bf-Dg
    144 Cell Mono 440-450W Advancing the Power of the Sun BVM6612M(S)-HC-BF-DG 0~+5W Power Tolerance 20.2% Maximum Efficiency 440-450W Power Output Range High Quality and Reliable Modules ◆Double-sided glass technology, more power generation ◆ Withstand up to 5400 Pa snow load and 2400 Pa wind load ◆ 2 EL inspections per cell/module for defect-free consistency ◆ High salt and ammonia resistance certified ◆ 0~+5 W guaranteed positive tolerance ◆ Rugged design for long-term durability; passed extended reliability tests 41.19 x 84.06 Inches Silver Frame / Double-sided glass Warranty Output Linear Warranty ◆ 12-year product warranty Standard Warranty 1.(12)years product warranty ◆ 30-year linear power output warranty 2.Out linear warranty with 2.5% degradation in the 1st year and less er than 0.5% degradation each year 97.5% from 2nd year to 30th year 95% Addi ti onal Va lue Comprehensive Certificates for Products and Management 85% ◆ UL 61730, IEC 61215, IEC 61730, CEC listed, MCS and CE Output pow ◆ ISO 9001 for Quality Management Systems 1 5 10 12 15 20 30 unit:year ◆ ISO 14001 for Environmental Management Systems ◆ OHSAS 18001 Occupational Health and Safety Systems Listed in Bloomberg New Energy Finance’s tier 1 list as of 1Q 2018 2107 N 1st Street Suite 550 San Jose, CA 95131 BOVIETSOLARUSA.COM ◆ 877.253.2858 ◆ [email protected] Electrical Characteristics STC BVM6612M-440S-H-HC-BF-DG BVM6612M-445S-H-HC-BF-DG BVM6612M-450S-H-HC-BF-DG Maximum Power (Pmax) 440W 445W 450W Maximum Power Current (Imp) 10.92A 10.99A 11.06A Maximum Power Voltage
    [Show full text]
  • Achila, Visigothic King, 34 Acisclus, Córdoban Martyr, 158 Adams
    Index ; Achila, Visigothic king, 34 Almodóvar del Río, Spain, 123–24 Acisclus, Córdoban martyr, 158 Almonacid de la Cuba, Spain, 150. See Adams, Robert, 21 also Dams Aemilian, St., 160 Alonso de la Sierra, Juan, 97 Aerial photography, 40, 82 Amalaric, Visigothic king, 29–30, 132, Aetius, Roman general, 173–75 157 Africa, 4, 21–23; and amphorae, 116, Amber, 114 137, 187, 196; and ARS, 46, 56, 90, Ammianus Marcellinus, Roman histo- 99, 187; and Byzantine reconquest, rian, 166, 168 30; and ‹shing, 103; and olive oil, Amphorae, 43, 80, 199–200; exported 88, 188; and Roman army, 114, 127, from Spain, 44, 97–98, 113, 115–16, 166; and trade, 105, 141; and Van- 172; kilns, 61–62, 87–90, 184; from dals, 27–28, 97, 127, 174 North Africa, 129, 187. See also African Red Slip (ARS) pottery, 101, Kilns 147, 186–87, 191, 197; de‹nition, 41, Anderson, Perry, 5 43, 44, 46; and site survival, 90, Andujar, Spain, 38, 47, 63 92–95, 98–99; and trade, 105–6, 110, Annales, 8, 12, 39 114, 116, 129, 183 Annona: disruption by Vandals, 97, Agde, council of, 29, 36, 41 174; to Roman army, 44, 81, 114–17; Agglomeration, 40–42, 59, 92 to Rome, 23, 27, 44, 81, 113; under Agila, Visigothic king, 158–59. See Ostrogoths, 29, 133. See also Army also Athanagild Antioch, Syria, 126 Agrippa, Roman general, 118 Anti-Semitism, 12, 33. See also Jews Alans, 24, 26, 27, 34, 126, 175 Antonine Itinerary, 152 Alaric, Visigothic king, 2, 5, 26–27 Apuleius, Roman writer, 75–76, 122 Alaric II, Visigothic king, 29–30 Aqueducts, 119, 130, 134, 174–75 Alcalá del Río, Spain, 40, 44, 93, 123, Aquitaine, France, 2, 27, 45, 102 148 Arabs, 33–34, 132–33, 137.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Sea-Caspian Steppe: Natural Conditions 20 1.1 the Great Steppe
    The Pechenegs: Nomads in the Political and Cultural Landscape of Medieval Europe East Central and Eastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 450–1450 General Editors Florin Curta and Dušan Zupka volume 74 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/ecee The Pechenegs: Nomads in the Political and Cultural Landscape of Medieval Europe By Aleksander Paroń Translated by Thomas Anessi LEIDEN | BOSTON This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided no alterations are made and the original author(s) and source are credited. Further information and the complete license text can be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ The terms of the CC license apply only to the original material. The use of material from other sources (indicated by a reference) such as diagrams, illustrations, photos and text samples may require further permission from the respective copyright holder. Publication of the presented monograph has been subsidized by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education within the National Programme for the Development of Humanities, Modul Universalia 2.1. Research grant no. 0046/NPRH/H21/84/2017. National Programme for the Development of Humanities Cover illustration: Pechenegs slaughter prince Sviatoslav Igorevich and his “Scythians”. The Madrid manuscript of the Synopsis of Histories by John Skylitzes. Miniature 445, 175r, top. From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository. Proofreading by Philip E. Steele The Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available online at http://catalog.loc.gov LC record available at http://catalog.loc.gov/2021015848 Typeface for the Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic scripts: “Brill”.
    [Show full text]
  • Ordering Divine Knowledge in Late Roman Legal Discourse
    Caroline Humfress ordering.3 More particularly, I will argue that the designation and arrangement of the title-rubrics within Book XVI of the Codex Theodosianus was intended to showcase a new, imperial and Theodosian, ordering of knowledge concerning matters human and divine. König and Whitmarsh’s 2007 edited volume, Ordering Knowledge in the Roman Empire is concerned primarily with the first three centuries of the Roman empire Ordering Divine Knowledge in and does not include any extended discussion of how knowledge was ordered and structured in Roman juristic or Imperial legal texts.4 Yet if we classify the Late Roman Legal Discourse Codex Theodosianus as a specialist form of Imperial prose literature, rather than Caroline Humfress classifying it initially as a ‘lawcode’, the text fits neatly within König and Whitmarsh’s description of their project: University of St Andrews Our principal interest is in texts that follow a broadly ‘compilatory’ aesthetic, accumulating information in often enormous bulk, in ways that may look unwieldy or purely functional In the celebrated words of the Severan jurist Ulpian – echoed three hundred years to modern eyes, but which in the ancient world clearly had a much higher prestige later in the opening passages of Justinian’s Institutes – knowledge of the law entails that modern criticism has allowed them. The prevalence of this mode of composition knowledge of matters both human and divine. This essay explores how relations in the Roman world is astonishing… It is sometimes hard to avoid the impression that between the human and divine were structured and ordered in the Imperial codex accumulation of knowledge is the driving force for all of Imperial prose literature.5 of Theodosius II (438 CE).
    [Show full text]
  • Glass in Ancient and Medieval Eastern Europe As Evidence of International Contacts
    Archeologia Polski 61 (2016), pp. 191-212 Archeologia Polski, LXI: 2016 PL ISSN 0003-8180 Ekaterina STOLYAROVA GLASS IN ANCIENT AND MEDIEVAL EASTERN EUROPE AS EVIDENCE OF INTERNATIONAL CONTACTS Abstract: This paper deals with glass artifacts as markers of interregional economic, religious and cultural links, trade routes, and social stratification. It is focused on finds from Eastern Europe from the Bronze Age to the 17th–18th centuries A.D. Keywords: glass beads, glass vessels, Eastern Europe, international links. Introduction Glass is one of the most ancient artificial materials possessing unique properties from which a variety of artifacts can be made. Among these are luxury artifacts and objects of applied art, tesserae for figured mosaics and stained glass, glass icons and ritual vessels, window-panes and tableware as well as small ornaments, i.e., arm rings, beads, fingerings, buttons and pendants. These artifacts were used in daily life, sold, donated, used to decorate clothes, interiors and architectural structures. They were symbols of their owner’s social and economic position. The value of glass as a historical source stems from its extensive application. Glass objects provide information on the formation and spread of glassmaking and on the place of glass in scientific concepts and the production of a given epoch. Chemical properties of glass and means of its production are of technological interest. Glass artifacts are important for the study of culture and daily life of a given epoch, e.g. the history of costume. Excavated glass objects are examined from the angle of their functions, peculiarities of their form and decoration, the spread and evolution of different type.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Die Geschichte Der Goten Bei Cassiodorus Und Jordanes
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OTHES DIPLOMARBEIT Titel der Diplomarbeit „Römische Gotenpolitik von den Anfängen bis zum Tod von Theodosius I.“ Verfasser Daniel Hackhofer angestrebter akademischer Grad Magister der Philosophie (Mag. phil.) Wien, 2012 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt: A 310 Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt: Alte Geschichte und Altertumskunde Betreuerin / Betreuer: emer. O. Univ. Prof. Dr. Gerhard Dobesch Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Zum Verständnis ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Inhalt und zeitlicher Rahmen ..................................................................................... 1 1.2 Zielsetzung ................................................................................................................. 1 2 Die Geschichte der Goten bei Cassiodorus und Jordanes .................................................. 2 2.1 Die Kontroverse um Bedeutung und Wert der Getica als Quelle .............................. 2 2.2 Argumente .................................................................................................................. 2 2.2.1 Jordanes .................................................................................................................. 2 2.2.2 Die Entstehung der Getica ...................................................................................... 4 2.2.3 Cassiodorus und seine verlorene Gotengeschichte ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Signs of the Times, Vol. 12 (1886)
    The Signs of the Times, Vol. 12 (1886) January 7, 1886 "The Ostrogoths and the Visigoths" The Signs of the Times 12, 1 , p. 4. THE peace which Constantine forced upon the Gothic nation in A.D. 331, continued for a period of thirty years. For the proper understanding of the further progress of our subject, it now becomes necessary to clearly define the distinction that existed between the two great divisions of the Gothic nation–the Ostro [Eastern] Goths, and the Visi [Western] Goths. As a matter of act this distinction existed from the earliest times of which we have any knowledge of the nation. "The Ostro and Visi, the eastern and western Goths, obtained those denominations from their original seats in Scandinavia. In all their future marches and settlements they preserved, with their names, the same relative situation."–Dec. and Fall, chap. 10, par. 8, note. Although this distinction was ever observed amongst them as a people, yet in all their wanderings and in all their expeditions, from the time they left the Baltic till the period of which we now treat, A.D. 361,–they were united and acted as one people. Now, however, we shall find them separated, and with the exception of a short interval, never more united. During the thirty years' peace with the Empire (A.D. 331-361), and under Hermanric, the last king of the united nation, the Gothic power was spread from the River Danube and the Black Sea to the Baltic. Of this we read:– "During a peaceful interval of thirty years, the Romans secured their frontiers, and the Goths extended their dominions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Last Horizons of Roman Gaul: Communication, Community, and Power at the End of Antiquity
    The Last Horizons of Roman Gaul: Communication, Community, and Power at the End of Antiquity The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Wilkinson, Ryan Hayes. 2015. The Last Horizons of Roman Gaul: Communication, Community, and Power at the End of Antiquity. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:17467211 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA The Last Horizons of Roman Gaul: Communication, Community, and Power at the End of Antiquity A dissertation presented by Ryan Hayes Wilkinson to The Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of History Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts May 2015 © 2015 Ryan Hayes Wilkinson All rights reserved. Dissertation Advisor: Professor Michael McCormick Ryan Hayes Wilkinson The Last Horizons of Roman Gaul: Communication, Community, and Power at the End of Antiquity Abstract In the fifth and sixth centuries CE, the Roman Empire fragmented, along with its network of political, cultural, and socio-economic connections. How did that network’s collapse reshape the social and mental horizons of communities in one part of the Roman world, now eastern France? Did new political frontiers between barbarian kingdoms redirect those communities’ external connections, and if so, how? To address these questions, this dissertation focuses on the cities of two Gallo-Roman tribal groups.
    [Show full text]