DOCSLIB.ORG

DTM Report September 2020 EN Corr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BURUNDI INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSONS HUMANITARIAN NEEDS REPORT SEPTEMBER 2020 Publica�on: December 2020 DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX displaced due to natural disasters 127,832 including 83% Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) 17% displaced as a result of other reasons 27,615 displaced households 55% displaced persons were women 84% 45% displaced persons were men of households reported that blankets are the most needed NFI displaced persons were children 58% (under 18 years) 66% displaced households intend to return of displaced households can not afford to their places of origin 93% healthcare related fees Map 1: Presence of IDPs per commune Kirundo RWANDA Cibitoke Ngozi Muyinga Kayanza DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE Bubanza Karusi CONGO Cankuzo Muramvya Bujumbura Mairie Bujumbura Mwaro Ruyigi Gitega Rural UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA Rumonge LakeTanganyika Bururi Rutana LEGEND Provincial boundary Communal boundary Capital Number of IDPs Makamba 3 - 700 701 - 2,000 2,001 - 5,500 Burundi 5,501 - 26,605 0 15 30 60 KM These data were collected from 5 to 30 September 2020 in all communes of the country © IOM Burundi - Reference Map (September 2020) This map is for illustra�on purposes only. Names and boundaries on this map do not imply the official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. Source: IOM, IGEBU 1 |9 DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX DEMOGRAPHICS OF THE IDP POPULATION ACCOMMODATION TYPES Graph 1: Demographics of the IDP popula�on Graph 2: Accommoda�on types by percentage of IDPs 55% 45% Female Male 4% < 1 an 3% 33% 24% 11% 1-5 ans 9% Host families Rented houses 17% 6-17 ans 14% of displaced households can not afford 20% 18-59 ans 17% healthcare related fees 22% 3% 60 ans + 2% Collec�ve sites YEAR OF DISPLACEMENT 15% 6% Graph 3: Percentage of currently displaced IDPs by year Straw houses Empty houses of ini�al displacement VULNERABILITIES 2020 Graph 5: Percentage distribu�on of types of vulnerabili�es reported by IDPs 2015 8% of displaced households 2016 were headed by women 2018 2019 2017 2013-2014 2% of displaced persons were 1% 24% 15% 9% 11% 10% 29% pregnant women of displaced persons were RETURN INTENTIONS OF DISPLACED 1% elderly living alone HOUSEHOLDS Graph 4: Percentage of displaced households by inten�on 1% of displaced children were of return orphans Return to community of of displaced children were origin 66% 1% unaccompanied Local integra�on 29% 1% of displaced persons live Rese�lement elsewhere in with disabili�es the country 5% 2 | 9 DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX MOVEMENTS OF DISPLACED PERSONS* 86% 14% 109,445 IDPs 18,387 IDPs Intraprovincial displacements** Interprovincial displacements** Map 2: Movements of displaced persons 758 RWANDA 5 454 Kirundo 9 767 Muyinga 6 295 113 Cibitoke 567 96 Kayanza Ngozi 1 018 1 353 798 DEMOCRATIC 631 Bubanza REPUBLIC OF THE 399 4 262 9 135 CONGO 7 642 Karusi Muramvya 224 Cankuzo 548 Bujumbura Gitega 528 Mairie 27 563 UNITED REPUBLIC 4 956 Mwaro 72 OF Bujumbura 28 449 39 735 TANZANIA Rural 72 Ruyigi 7 513 Rumonge Rutana Bururi Legend: 1 745 1 966 Intraprovincial Movement Interprovincial Movement Provincial boundary 113 168 357 2 948 591 833 Makamba © IOM Burundi - Reference Map (September 2020) This map is for illustra�on purposes only. Names and boundaries on this map do not imply the official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. Source: IOM, IGEBU * Movements of less than 40 persons were not represented on this map. * * Intraprovincial displacements are displacements that occur within the province of origin. Interprovincial displacements are displacements that occur outside the province of origin. 3 | 9 DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX IDP DISPLACEMENT TRENDS Graph 6: Change in number of IDPs by reason for decrease or increase from August to September 2020 Net Decrease Return to community of origin 277 277 Local integration - 4,144 84 2 Unknown -112 -75 -22 Net Increase Resettlement in the country + 640 Resettlement outside the country Drought Other -1,535 Strong winds Torrential rain -2,400 Table 1: Change in IDP presence from August to September 2020, by province Between the months of August and September, Province August September Difference Trend an overall decrease of 3 per cent (3,504 IDPs) in 2020 2020 the number of internal displaced persons was Bubanza 9,116 8,667 -449 recorded. This decrease were mainly due to the permanent return of IDPs in their communities Bujumbura Mairie 27,682 27,563 -119 of origin, as well as local integration. Bujumbura Rural 28,791 28,459 -332 The province of Cibitoke recorded the largest decrease with 44 per cent (1,557 IDPs) of the Bururi 1,865 1,745 -120 overall monthly decrease in IDPs. A number of IDPs in the communes of Rugombo, Buganda Cankuzo 14,237 14,419 182 and Bukinanyana, took advantage of the dry Cibitoke 11,324 9,767 -1,557 season to rebuild their destroyed homes and returned in their communities of origin. Gitega 885 742 -143 Another decrease was reported in the province Karusi 637 631 -6 of Bubanza mainly in the communes of Bubanza, Musigati and Rugazi where 449 IDPs returned to Kayanza 1,754 1,779 25 their places of origin after the rehabilitation of their houses. Kirundo 5,361 5,454 93 In the province of Bujumbura Rural, a decrease Makamba 5,190 5,010 -180 of 332 IDPs was reported after the return of Muramvya 602 548 -54 some IDP families to their community of origin. Some families in the commune of Mugongo- Muyinga 7,314 7,160 -154 manga received a support from the Solidarity NGO to rehabilitate their houses and returned Mwaro 169 135 -34 to their place of origin. Ngozi 693 695 2 Despite the decreases reported in other provinces, the province of Cankuzo identified Rumonge 7,701 7,513 -188 182 persons newly displaced by torrential rains and strong winds occurred on the 31st of August Rutana 2,212 1,966 -246 in the communes of Kigamba and Mishiha. Ruyigi 5,803 5,579 -224 Total 131,336 127,832 -3,504 4 | 9 DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX HUMANITARIAN OVERVIEW EDUCATION Graph 7: Percentage of households reporting the 67% of households reported the lack of school materials. lack of school materials, by province Among the 24,783 displaced school-age children (aged 6 to 17), 77 per cent attended school. The lack of school Bururi 100% materials was the main reason reported by households as it prevented children from going to school. Households in Mwaro 100% the provinces of Bururi, Gitega, Kayanza, Ngozi et Mwaro Kayanza were the most affected by this lack of school materials. 95% For some IDP households (13%), lack of food was also a Ngozi 92% reason preventing children from going to school. Gitega 89% WATER, SANITATION AND HYGIENE Graph 8: Percentage of households reporting the 32% of households have non-functional latrines. lack of functional latrines, by province Bujumbura Mairie, Ruyigi, Bubanza and Makamba are Bujumbura Mairie 70% provinces with large majority (more than 60%) of displaced households without functional latrines. Due to their high Ruyigi 69% degree of vulnerability, IDPs spend most of their income on food at the expense of of building latrines. Bubanza 66% Kirundo 66% Cibitoke 50% NUTRITION Graph 9: Percentage of households reporting access 41% of households had access to only one meal per day. to one meal per day, by province Most IDP households (more than 70%) in Kirundo, Ngozi Kirundo 97% and Rumonge provinces reported that they only ate one meal per day. The province of Kirundo was the most Ngozi 83% affected due to the vulnerability of IDP households. The province of Cibitoke (62%) was also affected and Rumonge 72% the reason would be the natural disasters which have Cibitoke destroyed crops during the rainy seasons. 62% Muyinga 54% Bubanza 51% 5 | 9 DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX HUMANITARIAN OVERVIEW Graph 10: Percentage of households do not have HEALTH access to pharmacies, by province 37% of households did not have access to a pharmacy. Bururi 74% The most common health problems reported by surveyed Ruyigi 69% households were malaria (91%), flu (68%) and amoeba Muramvya 59% (57%). The majority of households in Bururi, Ruyigi, Muramvya, and Rumonge provinces reported that they Rumonge 56% did not have access to pharmacies. These were available in cities or provincial capitals while the majority of IDPs Karusi 54% lived in the countryside. Ngozi 53% Rutana 52% LIVELIHOODS Graph 11: Percentage of households do not have 56% of households did not have access to arable land. access to arable land, by province According to the surveyed households, the main Bujumbura Mairie 93% occupations of IDPs were daily work (50%) and agriculture (43%). The vast majority of IDP households in Bujumbura Bubanza 73% Mairie, Bubanza, Rumonge and Makamba provinces did not have access to arable land. The particularity of Rumonge 66% Bujumbura Mairie is the unavailability of cultivable land in Makamba 61% general, and in the other provinces, the high population density could explain the lack of arable land. Bujumbura Rural 56% Cankuzo 53% NON-FOOD ITEMS (NFI) Graph 12: Percentage of households reporting small 41% of households reported small hosting capacity as hosting capacity as a shelther issue, by province a shelter issue. The majority of households in Kirundo, Muramvya, Kirundo 91% Cibitoke, and Makamba provinces reported small hosting Muramvya 57% capacity as a shelter issue considering that IDPs and host families shared the same roof. Another major shelter Muyinga 56% issue was weather protection reported by 39 per cent of displaced households. Cibitoke 50% Makamba 50% 6 | 9 DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX HUMANITARIAN OVERVIEW NFI (NON-FOOD ITEMS) NEEDS The table below shows the different provinces according to the percentages of displaced households that reported the most needed non-food items.
Recommended publications
  • The Study of Master Plan for Port Sector in the Republic of Burundi

    The Study of Master Plan for Port Sector in the Republic of Burundi

    Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Equipment Burundi The Study of Master Plan for Port Sector in the Republic of Burundi Final Report (Summary) September 2012 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY PADECO Co., Ltd. Nippon Koei Co. Ltd. International Development Center of Japan Incorporated EI JR 12-189 Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Equipment Burundi The Study of Master Plan for Port Sector in the Republic of Burundi Final Report (Summary) September 2012 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY PADECO Co. Ltd. Nippon Koei Co. Ltd. International Development Center of Japan Incorporated The Study of Master Plan for Port Sector in the Republic of Burundi Summary Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms ................................................................................................. v 1. Introduction....................................................................................................................... 1 2. Socio/Economic Developments in Burundi ....................................................................... 1 2.1 Trend in Socio/Economic Status............................................................................... 1 2.2 Current Plans for Economic Development ................................................................ 2 3. Current Status of Port Sector of Burundi......................................................................... 3 3.1 Bujumbura Port ....................................................................................................... 3 3.2 Rumonge Port .........................................................................................................
  • Burundi-SCD-Final-06212018.Pdf

    Burundi-SCD-Final-06212018.Pdf

    Document of The World Bank Report No. 122549-BI Public Disclosure Authorized REPUBLIC OF BURUNDI ADDRESSING FRAGILITY AND DEMOGRAPHIC CHALLENGES TO REDUCE POVERTY AND BOOST SUSTAINABLE GROWTH Public Disclosure Authorized SYSTEMATIC COUNTRY DIAGNOSTIC June 15, 2018 Public Disclosure Authorized International Development Association Country Department AFCW3 Africa Region International Finance Corporation (IFC) Sub-Saharan Africa Department Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA) Sub-Saharan Africa Department Public Disclosure Authorized BURUNDI - GOVERNMENT FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective as of December 2016) Currency Unit = Burundi Franc (BIF) US$1.00 = BIF 1,677 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ACLED Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project AfDB African Development Bank BMM Burundi Musangati Mining CE Cereal Equivalent CFSVA Comprehensive Food Security and Vulnerability Assessment CNDD-FDD Conseil National Pour la Défense de la Démocratie-Forces pour la Défense de la Démocratie (National Council for the Defense of Democracy-Forces for the Defense of Democracy) CPI Consumer Price Index CPIA Country Policy and Institutional Assessment DHS Demographic and Health Survey EAC East African Community ECVMB Enquête sur les Conditions de Vie des Menages au Burundi (Survey on Household Living Conditions in Burundi) ENAB Enquête Nationale Agricole du Burundi (National Agricultural Survey of Burundi) FCS Fragile and conflict-affected situations FDI Foreign Direct Investment FNL Forces Nationales
  • The Mineral Industry of Burundi in 2016

    The Mineral Industry of Burundi in 2016

    2016 Minerals Yearbook BURUNDI [ADVANCE RELEASE] U.S. Department of the Interior January 2020 U.S. Geological Survey The Mineral Industry of Burundi By Thomas R. Yager In 2016, the production of mineral commodities—notably can be found in previous editions of the U.S. Geological Survey gold, tantalum, tin, and tungsten—represented only a minor Minerals Yearbook, volume III, Area Reports—International— part of the economy of Burundi (United Nations Economic Africa, which are available at https://www.usgs.gov/centers/ Commission for Africa, 2017). The legislative framework for nmic/africa-and-middle-east. the mineral sector in Burundi is provided by the Mining Code of Burundi (law No. 1/21 of October 15, 2013). The legislative Reference Cited framework for the petroleum sector is provided by the Mining United Nations Economic Commission for Africa, 2017, Burundi, in African and Petroleum Act of 1976. Data on mineral production are statistical yearbook 2017: United Nations Economic Commission for Africa, in table 1. Table 2 is a list of major mineral industry facilities. p. 113–117. (Accessed November 7, 2018, at https://www.uneca.org/sites/ More-extensive coverage of the mineral industry of Burundi default/files/PublicationFiles/asyb-2017.pdf.) TABLE 1 BURUNDI: PRODUCTION OF MINERAL COMMODITIES1 (Metric tons, gross weight, unless otherwise specified) Commodity2 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 METALS Gold, mine, Au contente kilograms 500 400 500 500 500 Niobium and tantalum, mine, columbite-tantalite concentrate: Gross weight do. 258,578 73,518 105,547 53,093 r 31,687 Nb contente do. 51,000 14,000 21,000 10,000 r 6,200 Ta contente do.
  • Burundi: Administrative Map May 2015

    Burundi: Administrative Map May 2015

    Burundi: Administrative Map May 2015 Kalehe Muhanga Rwamagana Nguzi Gishyita Kamonyi Karagwe Idjwi Karongi Muleba Ruhango EST Ngoma Birenga Kalehe Bugesera Kirehe Sengerema RWANDA MWANZA Cyesha Nyanza Nyanza Nyamasheke OUEST Nyamagabe SUD Nyamahale Kabare Kabare Kirehe Ngara Cyangugu Shabunda Bukavu Huye Rusizi KIRUNDO Butare Nyango Walungu Kibeho Gisagara Kirundo Nyabugombe Biharamulo NgaraKAGERA Itari Nyaruguru Walungu Biharamulo MUYINGA Keza Nyakahura CIBITOKE NGOZI Muyinga Geita Cibitoke Kayanza Ngozi Mu Rusagamba Nyaruonga Chato Mwenga KAYANZA Karuzi Bubanza Nyantwiga Ruamagaza LEGEND BUBANZA KARUZI CANKUZO International boundary Uvira Cakuzo MURAMVYA Kakonko 1st admin boundary Kakonko BUJUMBURA Muramvya 2nd admin boundaryMbogwe SUD-KIVU Musasa Undetermined boundary Mwenga MAIRIE BURUNDI Major road Uvira Bujumbura Gitega RUYIGI Main river Ruyigi GEITA DEMOCRATIC MWARO GITEGA Mugunzu Ocean / lake BUJUMBURA Major town REPUBLIC OF RURAL Kibondo Airport/ Airstrip THE CONGO Kasana Bukombe Shabunda Kasulu BURURI Bururi RUTANA Rutana UNITED REPUBLIC Kahama OF TANZANIA SHINYANGA Kibondo Nyange Main Map 1:1,180,000 KIGOMA MAKAMBAMakamba Makere Fizi Fizi Lake Kasulu Date: May 2015 Mbirira Sources: Boundaries (ESRI/OCHA), Tanganyika roads (ESRI), settlements (OCHA), Buhigwe rivers and lakes (ESRI) Kaliua MANIEMA Munyegera Feedback: Manyovu Mugombe [email protected] Kabambare www.unocha.org/eastern-africa www.reliefweb.intTABORA The boundaries and names shown and the Kigoma Kasulu Township Authority designations used on this map do not Uyowaimply Mgende official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. .
  • Burundi CERF Narrative Report 2008.Pdf

    Burundi CERF Narrative Report 2008.Pdf

    ANNUAL REPORT OF THE HUMANITARIAN/RESIDENT COORDINATOR ON THE USE OF CERF GRANTS Country Burundi Humanitarian / Resident Youssef Mahmoud Coordinator Reporting Period 1 January – 31 December 2008 I. Executive Summary Two allocations were granted to Burundi in 2008: one from the rapid response window ($1.6 million) and one from the underfunded window ($3.6 million). In both cases and in absence of a Consolidated Humanitarian Appeal for the first time in seven years, CERF funding provided much needed emergency support to tackle both the food crisis and underfunded emergencies in a context of transition and fragile recovery. The initial rapid response allocation came at a critical time for Burundi, one of the countries hardest hit by the soaring food prices with an increase of more than 130 percent between 2007 and 2008. It enabled strengthening the health and nutrition response to needs of 1,100 new severe acute malnourished children and the extension of screening programs for 16,000 children. The purchase of seeds and tools for 40,000 families recently returned from Tanzania prevented a large number of repatriated refugees from falling into the cycle of severe food insecurity. The underfunded grant enabled meeting critical food needs for 15,000 Burundian refugees from 1972 who were repatriated in 2008. This group was initially not included in the planning of UN agencies as their return started when both Burundian and Tanzanian Governments reached an agreement on the naturalization process of those willing to remain in Tanzania. The same grant provided a much needed food return package for Burundians expelled from Tanzania.
  • Table of Contents

    Table of Contents

    TABLE OF CONTENTS MAP OF BURUNDI I INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 II THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGROUPMENT CAMPS ...................................... 2 III OTHER CAMPS FOR DISPLACED POPULATIONS ........................................ 4 IV HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS DURING REGROUPMENT ......................... 6 Extrajudicial executions ......................................................................................... 6 Property destruction ............................................................................................... 8 Possible prisoners of conscience............................................................................ 8 V HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN THE CAMPS ........................................... 8 Undue restrictions on freedom of movement ......................................................... 8 "Disappearances" ................................................................................................... 9 Life-threatening conditions .................................................................................. 10 Insecurity in the context of armed conflict .......................................................... 11 VI HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS DISGUISED AS PROTECTION ................ 12 VII CONCLUSION.................................................................................................... 14 VIII RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................... 15
  • Rumonge – Rutunga -Bujumbura Section

    Rumonge – Rutunga -Bujumbura Section

    Language: English Original: English PROJECT: MULTINATIONAL: TANZANIA –BURUNDI ROAD PROJECT. RAP summary RN3: RUMONGE – RUTUNGA -BUJUMBURA SECTION COUNTRIES: TANZANIA-BURUNDI Team Leader: J. NDIKUMWAMI, Senior Transport Engineer, PICU.1/COBI Co-Team Leader: J. B AGUMA, PRINCIPAL Transport Economist, RDGE.4 P. KANYIMBO, Regional Integration Coordinator, RDGE0 Preparation Team E&S Team Members: P. HORUGAVYE, Chief socio-economist, RDGC4 /SNSC F. KAYIGAMBA, Environmental expert, Consultant SNSC E.B. KAHUBIRE, Social Development Officer, RDGE4 /SNSC Date: July 2018 Multinational Tanzania –Burundi road project. RAP summary Project Title: Rehabilitation of Bujumbura – Rumonge Road Section Country: Burundi Department: RDGE Division: RDGE 3 Project Category: 1 1. INTRODUCTION The Rumonge - Bujumbura road section is one of the EAC roads under the Multi-National Tanzania/Burundi: Nyakanazi-Kasulu-Manyovu/Rumonge-Rutunga-Bujumbura Road Project. The Project objective is to rehabilitate and upgrade the existing Rumonge–Bujumbura road (78km) section to bituminous that conform to East African Community standards with the aim of enhancing trade, transport and tourism in the East African Region as well as improving socioeconomic conditions for the population along Lake Tanganyika. The project is being implemented by EAC through Burundian Office of Roads (Office des Routes – OdR). OdR, under the Ministry of Transport, Public Works, and Equipment is the roads authority of Burundi. The importance of the project road lays on the fact that apart from linking Burundi with Tanzania, the road provides transportation route for agricultural and mining produce to and from the Great Lakes countries in particular the eastern DRC. The project shall ultimately improve life for the population along Lake Tanganyika, this road being a driver of the economy of the Great Lakes countries and Burundi in particular, along the Central Trade Corridor.
  • World Bank Document

    World Bank Document

    ReportNo. 8694-AFR Africa The Great LakesCorridor Study March, 1990 Public Disclosure Authorized InfrastructureDivision AfricaTechnical Department FOR OFFICIALUSE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Docwnentof the Word Bank Thisdocument has a restricteddistribution and may be usedby recipients Public Disclosure Authorized only in the performanceof theirofficial duties.Its contentsmay not otherwise be disclosedwithout World Bankauthorization. GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AMI Agence Maritime Internationale (Belgian-owned forwarding and clearing company) BELBASE Former Belgian concessions at Dar es Salaam and Kigoma B/L Bill of Lading BNR Banque Nationale du Rwanda CIF Cost, Insurance and Freight C/F Clearing and Forwarding CMB Coffee Marketing Board (Uganda) CORWACO Private Rwandese trucking company DSM Dar es Salaam ECA Economic Commission for Africa EEC European Economic Community ESA Equivalent Standard Axle FOB Free On Board F/E Foreign Exchange GVW Gross Vehicle Weight ICD Inland Clearance Depot KCHC Kenya Cargo Handling Company KPA Kenya Ports Authority KRC Kenya Railways Corporation L/C Letter of Credit Liberation War Overthrow of General Amin LLC Landlocked Country MAGERWA Rwandese warehousing company, joint public-private venture NCTA Northern Corridor Transit Agreement NRM National Resistance Movement ODA Overseas Development Administration (UK) OTRABU Burundian parastatal trucking company O/D Origin/Destination POL Petroleum, Oils and Lubricants PTA Preferential Trade Area RCTD Road Customs Transit Declaration SOCABU Burundian parastatal insurance company STIR Rwandese parastatal trucking company TC Transit Country THA Tanzania Harbors Authority Transocean Ugandan parastatal clearing and forwarding authority TRC Tanzania Railways Corporation URC Uganda Railways Corporation ZBR Zaire, Burundi and Rwanda THE GREAT IA S CORRIDR STUDY Table of Contents EXECUTIVE ',UMHARY .
  • Health Food Security HIGHLIGHTS/KEY PRIORITIES

    Health Food Security HIGHLIGHTS/KEY PRIORITIES

    Burundi • Humanitarian Bi-Monthly report Situation Report #04 Date/Time 28 May 2009 This report was issued by Burundi office. It covers the period from 11 to 24 May 2009. The next report will be issued on or around 9 June 2009. HIGHLIGHTS/KEY PRIORITIES - MSF prepares the phase out of its emergency nutritional operation in Kirundo Province - Repatriation from last Burundian camp in Rwanda - New refugee camp in Bwagiriza I. Situation Overview The President of Burundi has officially requested the support (logistical, technical, financial and moral) of the United Nations for the preparation and the organisation of the 2010 elections. Since March, doctors have been strike over their salaries. Developments in South Kivu and the forthcoming operation Kimia II against FDLR, are not expected to have a major impact on Burundi. The IACP contingency plan remains valid and will be updated in September. II. Humanitarian Needs and Response Health MSF is preparing to phase out its emergency nutrition programme in the Kirundo province as it expects the situation to improve as the harvests ongoing. MSF has also noted that children being referred to its nutritional centres are not as severely malnourished as when it started its emergency programme. Since February 9th, 2009; over 480 children were admitted to the nutritional stabilisation centre because of acute severe malnutrition with medical complications; some 28 children were lost because their situation was too critical when they arrived at the stabilisation centre. During this emergency nutrition programme, MSF found that 58% of the children admitted had oedemas and systematic testing of incoming patients also showed that 53.2% also had malaria.
  • US Forest Service International Programs, Department of Agriculture

    US Forest Service International Programs, Department of Agriculture

    US Forest Service International Programs, Department of Agriculture Republic of Burundi Technical Assistance to the US Government Mission in Burundi on Natural Resource Management and Land Use Policy Mission Dates: September 9 – 22, 2006 Constance Athman Mike Chaveas Hydrologist Africa Program Specialist Mt. Hood National Forest Office of International Programs 16400 Champion Way 1099 14th St NW, Suite 5500W Sandy, OR 97055 Washington, DC 20005 (503) 668-1672 (202) 273-4744 [email protected] [email protected] Jeanne Evenden Director of Lands Intermountain Region 324 25th Street Ogden, UT 84401 (801) 625-5150 [email protected] ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to extend our gratitude to all those who supported this mission to Burundi. In particular we would like acknowledge Ann Breiter, Deputy Chief of Mission at the US Embassy in Bujumbura for her interest in getting the US Forest Service involved in the natural resource management issues facing Burundi. We would also like to thank US Ambassador Patricia Moller for her strong interest in this work and for the support of all her staff at the US Embassy. Additionally, we are grateful to the USAID staff that provided extensive technical and logistical support prior to our arrival, as well as throughout our time in Burundi. Laura Pavlovic, Alice Nibitanga and Radegonde Bijeje were unrelentingly helpful throughout our visit and fountains of knowledge about the country, the culture, and the history of the region, as well as the various ongoing activities and actors involved in development and natural resource management programs. We would also like to express our gratitude to the Minister of Environment, Odette Kayitesi, for taking the time to meet with our team and for making key members of her staff available to accompany us during our field visits.
  • The Burundi Peace Process

    The Burundi Peace Process

    ISS MONOGRAPH 171 ISS Head Offi ce Block D, Brooklyn Court 361 Veale Street New Muckleneuk, Pretoria, South Africa Tel: +27 12 346-9500 Fax: +27 12 346-9570 E-mail: [email protected] Th e Burundi ISS Addis Ababa Offi ce 1st Floor, Ki-Ab Building Alexander Pushkin Street PEACE CONDITIONAL TO CIVIL WAR FROM PROCESS: THE BURUNDI PEACE Peace Process Pushkin Square, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Th is monograph focuses on the role peacekeeping Tel: +251 11 372-1154/5/6 Fax: +251 11 372-5954 missions played in the Burundi peace process and E-mail: [email protected] From civil war to conditional peace in ensuring that agreements signed by parties to ISS Cape Town Offi ce the confl ict were adhered to and implemented. 2nd Floor, Armoury Building, Buchanan Square An AU peace mission followed by a UN 160 Sir Lowry Road, Woodstock, South Africa Tel: +27 21 461-7211 Fax: +27 21 461-7213 mission replaced the initial SA Protection Force. E-mail: [email protected] Because of the non-completion of the peace ISS Nairobi Offi ce process and the return of the PALIPEHUTU- Braeside Gardens, Off Muthangari Road FNL to Burundi, the UN Security Council Lavington, Nairobi, Kenya Tel: +254 20 386-1625 Fax: +254 20 386-1639 approved the redeployment of an AU mission to E-mail: [email protected] oversee the completion of the demobilisation of ISS Pretoria Offi ce these rebel forces by December 2008. Block C, Brooklyn Court C On 18 April 2009, at a ceremony to mark the 361 Veale Street ON beginning of the demobilisation of thousands New Muckleneuk, Pretoria, South Africa DI Tel: +27 12 346-9500 Fax: +27 12 460-0998 TI of PALIPEHUTU-FNL combatants, Agathon E-mail: [email protected] ON Rwasa, leader of PALIPEHUTU-FNL, gave up AL www.issafrica.org P his AK-47 and military uniform.
  • Republic of Burundi Fiscal Decentralization and Local Governance

    Republic of Burundi Fiscal Decentralization and Local Governance

    94638 Republic of Burundi Fiscal Decentralization and Local Governance Managing Trade-Offs to Promote Sustainable Reforms Burundi Public Expenditure Review OCTOBER 2014 B Republic of Burundi Fiscal Decentralization and Local Governance: Managing Trade-Offs to Promote Sustainable Reforms OCTOBER 2014 WORLD BANK Republic of Burundi Fiscal Decentralization and Local Governance: Cover Design and Text Layout:Duina ReyesManaging Bakovic Trade-Offs to Promote Sustainable Reforms i Standard Disclaimer: This volume is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The endorsementboundaries, colors, or acceptance denominations, of such boundaries.and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the Copyright Statement: The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. This translation was not created by The World Bank and should not be considered an official World BankIf you translation.create a translation The World of thisBank work, shall please not be add liable the for following any content disclaimer or error along in this with translation.