How Underground Heavy Metal Became Mainstream Heavy Music by Dave Burns [email protected]
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Lamentations of the Flame Princess (www.lotfp.com) presents: Impure Metal: How Underground Heavy Metal Became Mainstream Heavy Music By Dave Burns [email protected] Words Are Not Just Words I know this sounds a little cliché But I don’t give a damn anyway So let this be a lesson to you Though we leave we are never through If you help to keep metal alive The underground will always survive I pledge to keep it alive I promise metal will thrive I swear myself to the cause I’ll teach all the metal laws Razor “Iron Hammer” Lessons? Causes? Laws? In today’s world, the lines Dave Carlo wrote seem to be quaint relics from a bygone era in which the words “heavy metal” had a meaning that transcended music and embraced an ethos. Almost every time you placed a record on a turntable or a cassette in a deck during the 1980s, some singer was belting out lyrics targeting a whole host of enemies. Battles, wars, and violent acts were filtered through a heavy-metal prism and became tales designed to rally denim and leather troops for an approaching cataclysmic confrontation that would banish posers from the face of the earth, shatter the societal chains wrapped around individuals from birth or fundamentally alter the way that the world worked. Metal was not merely a genre of music, but an antagonistic philosophy seeking changes in the status quo: I always understood rock as a form of revolution of young people against the establishment. Though nowadays, of course, it’s one big commercial machine, deep within me the spirit is there. I can’t deny it, because I experienced it like that when I was a kid.1 Tom G. Warrior’s sentiments were not always explicitly expressed by thrashing, banging, and screaming metalheads; however, his belief that “rock [was] a form of revolution” was buried somewhere in the mix whenever heavy metal blared from stacks at shows or headphones at home. In fact, the “underground” spoken of in “Iron Hammer” was not a concept magically appearing from nowhere without any antecedents, but a term with a particular history that dovetailed with the position metallers occupied within the wider societies in which they lived. Although there are 2 numerous interpretations of the word’s meaning when it is employed in an oppositional context, each one is a variation on the idea that an underground movement is “separate from prevailing social or artistic environments, and often exercises a subversive influence.”2 This definition is broad and can cover everything from the high-brow pranks of a performance artist to the ham-handed plays of unreconstructed Marxists--but the origins of the term stem from two historical events. When Germany rapidly conquered France, the Third Reich believed that the absence of a concerted counterattack was a sign of the country’s resignation to its fascist fate. Thousands of men and women, however, refused to meekly line up behind the puppet government the Nazis installed and formed a fragmented Free French state that resisted the German occupiers and native collaborators. Secrecy was essential to the resistance, and an elaborate network of safe houses, cryptic codes and alter egos were utilized to frustrate the coercive arms of the authorities. This collective effort to fashion a new nation within the boundaries of the corrupted state came to be called “the underground,” because the fascists forced freedom fighters to conduct their operations in a covert world that existed below the surface of everyday life. After the colonial war in French Indochina inherited by the United States became the Vietnam War, a complex protest movement coalesced around various anti-establishment impulses that embraced and expanded the notions associated with the designation “underground.” Newspapers like The Barb in Berkley, California, and The Paper in Lansing, Michigan, played a central role in the rebellions of the 1960s and were referred to as the “underground press” to distinguish the publications from staid mainstream periodicals that refused to publish material deemed to be detrimental to the war effort and the morality of Americans. Articles extolling the liberating effects of sex, drugs and rock ‘n’ roll ran next to screeds clamoring for social justice, attacking consumerist materialism and condemning the war machine in the underground papers; and out of this psychedelic printed stew, a variety of underground movements emerged that wanted to return to a barter-based agricultural economy, undermine the power of the military and big business, muster an outlaw army made up of freed prisoners or reconfigure human consciousness with LSD. By the late 1960s, similarly inclined undergrounds had arisen in the industrialized countries of the West and provided some of the foundational material for what would become the first heavy metal band to ever exist. There is little doubt that Black Sabbath was a unique group that pioneered a dystopian and discordant sound which made the tame bohemian strains of The Velvet Underground appear soft, smooth and decadent; however, the fact that the band’s lyrics were a direct outgrowth of the ideological underground of the sixties receives much less attention. But Black Sabbath’s scathing anti-militaristic anthems (“War Pigs”); bleak fables about technological hells (“Into the Void”); weed- 3 inspired odes to freedom (“Sweet Leaf”); and revolutionary dreams of peace and love (“Children of the Grave”) were subjects ripped from the headlines of the underground press and continue to reverberate with a distinctive metallic clang today. Yet many music journalists lauding the flowering of countercultural rock believed that Black Sabbath were benighted barbarians who traded in brutish power instead of refined art, and a deluge of derogatory words rained down like soot from a Birmingham mill on the heads of the band. So, at its very inception, heavy metal was presented as a medium fit for maladjusted miscreants who deserved derision when the genre could not be ignored. These haughty attacks only strengthened the folkways imparted to heavy metal by its working-class cultural origins, and by the time the phrase “The New Wave of British Heavy Metal” served notice to the world that the genre was not going to disappear, metal was the musical form for the downtrodden and disenfranchised who refused to break under the pressure applied by the authorities. Gamblers, rakes and outlaws were protagonists in the yarns spun out by Motörhead; convicts, harlots and delinquents populated the back alleys where Iron Maiden lurked; and Witchfinder General chronicled the wanderings of wastrels who lived for the rush of sex, drugs and music, while Saxon was being hassled by the “Strong Arm of the Law” that Judas Priest was busy breaking. The dark and depressive notes about human existence also remained a lyrical staple, and the horror of nuclear warfare (Raven “Seek and Destroy”); the moral bankruptcy of modern civilization (Judas Priest “Savage”); the vapid venality of the media (Motörhead “Talking Head”); and political corruption financed by businessmen (Legend “Frontline”) were all topics heavy metal bands touched on in songs. The music itself also became a subject during the first half of the 1980s, and titles such as “Heavy Metal Mania,” “Heavy Metal Thunder,” “Metal Daze,” “Heavy Metal Rules,” and “Heavy Metal is the Law” began to appear on the back of record covers. These paeans to the power of the weighty chords were not only signs of a thriving genre, but also evidence that the music formed the basis of a culture that was hostile to mainstream conceptions of aural entertainment. Bands slowly started to identify enemies within the music industry, and popular bands capable of producing insipid hit singles became the adversaries metalheads sought to eliminate with their strafing and searing sounds. Although industry-approved trends and fads assumed various guises during the decade, obstinate headbangers continued to scoff at the posers, prostitutes and pimps that presented safe, radio- friendly fare as the future of music. Disparaged, derided, and dismissed as misfits with no prospects in the industry or life, metalheads appropriated the term “underground” to mark themselves as brothers and sisters united in opposition to mainstream society. The haphazardly constructed definition of what it meant to be 4 underground, however, was not completed until the fury and force of heavy metal was ratcheted up to feverish levels by the bands who considered themselves to be thrashing maniacs. There is no need to trot out evidence underscoring the anti-establishment and anti-authoritarian leanings of thrashing heavy metal due to the numerous examples readily available, but the importance of the amorphous ideology of the underground was conveyed in some out-of-place lyrics contained in Tankard’s “Acid Death:” Fight for the nation underground Dyin’ and killin’ so hard tonight We break up the wall of sound The end is near we will fight The unifying principle of the underground was lifted from the do-it-yourself credo and contrarian conventions of hardcore punk, but thrashers made it all their own to highlight their marginal position within the wider confines of the music industry and polite society. Tankard’s adversarial lines were one of many verses that vaguely outlined the parameters of the underground without ever spelling out what it meant, but certain components were as clear as the shards of glass littering the floor wherever drunk thrashers congregated. Almost nobody writing about heavy metal is concerned with such