DOCSLIB.ORG

EARTHQUAKE FAULT MAP of a PORTION of SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH UGS Public Information Series 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EARTHQUAKE FAULT MAP of a PORTION of SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH UGS Public Information Series 3 EARTHQUAKE FAULT MAP OF A PORTION OF SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH UGS Public Information Series 3 ..._ ..._I!!!!!!!!!!!!I!!!!!!!!!!!!I!!!!!!!!!!!!I!!!!!!!!!!!! ........ I11!!!----------------- .. This map is general reference only. 2~5 t'(~arm Springs Fault Detailed maps are available at the Salt Great Salt , Lake County Planning Department. ~I Lake Virginia Street , Fault ~ ~ ~~ "- Related Maps: '''..- USGS MF-2114,1990 (S.F. Personius &W.E. Scott) \ North Temp/e i 1Oi.. ~ ~ USGS 1-2106, 1992 (S.F. Personius & W.E. Scott) \~" - " ~\ ~80-1 J 4005 ;c1A ~;-tO ( 1\.\ /'West \.\ -1-- • #1 "\ ~ G \~ Valley ~i', ~ 13005 '\ ..'~. ~\r: ~#~o J~ ~~~~ft'l~ 1-15 ( :005 ~~~: Explanation . 'f'{9;'. II '0 .A.. ~ "' %. ~ [\ 1 en ~ I"'I~ "~ -,,--------- .. ~\ 215~ Ii Q; ~\Jr ~' l\iD -" 6 I' .\... 33005 Known trace of fault with __+----I---+---¥;j~~r--..i,,,,;a.;.;...*'.~1--" I ~ ~ ~~ 39005 I evidence of Holocene I), \ Io.--......-......f-......+-I~~~t" re.~ 8~ \\l~~ ~ ) (about 10,000 years ago to present) movement. \' L- ~~y\f Dashed where ~ 53005 I ~ concealed or inferred. \ 1 I f", ~ ~ '- -\ ~ ~ 0 __ ~~_ ~ ~~oo ~--------------~ ~F~r'-=-;=::d.-I._215 - ~ ~O\o~ ) ~ - \r.- c~_p..~-.c See our Quaternary Fault I ~~Un;o, 8, ;rJ "v v and Fold interactive map for up to date fault and earthquake information at _5 \f ~LL 'L--r-~.....,~.~ ~ https://geology.utah.gov/ I Q; 94005 .~ ~/rn 1) /-1511 ,- ~J~ Zt: a apps/qfaults/index.html & 1(/) ~ ~ ",07); ~ I. J f\ ~ 1, -c~J\lyg:wOOD '" - 106005 D- ~ ~ Scale - LiJ ::i g tZ» 1 2 MILES t:: o U U KILOMETERS .. / ,'/ < .... -~~.,~ __________ ~L- __________________~ ./.- /-15 .. ",- ...,'-....f Modified from Scott and Shroba, 1985, U.S. Geological .. f ..........f' Survey Open-File Report 85-448; and Keaton and others, !,..-' 1987, U.S. Geological Survey Technical Report, Contract ~ number 14-08-0001-22048 Drafted by Bill D. Black from digitized map ~rovlded by' Craig V. Nelson, Salt Lake County Planmng Department. UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Richard Allis, Director 1954 W. North Temple, #3110 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-6100 The Utah Geological Survey is a division within the Department of Natural Resources EARTHQUAKE FAULTS What is a fault? A fault is a break in the earth's crust along which movement can take place causing an earthquake. In Utah, movement along faults is mostly vertical; mountain blocks (for example, the Wasatch Range) move up relative to the downward movement of valley blocks (for example, the Salt Lake Valley). Why are faults a concern? Faults with evidence of Holocene (about 10,000 years ago to present) movement are the main concern because they are most likely to generate future earthquakes. If the earthquake is large enough, surface fault rupture can occur. What is surface fault rupture? With a large earthquake (about magnitude 6.5 and greater), the fault rupture can reach and displace the ground surface, forming a fault scarp (steep break in slope). The resulting fault scarp may be several inches to 20 feet in height, and up to about 40 miles in length, depending on the size of the earthquake. What are the effects of surface fault rupture?* An area hundreds of feet wide can be affected, called the zone of deformation, which occurs chiefly on the downthrown side of the main fault and encompasses multiple minor faults, cracks, local tilting, and grabens (downdropped blocks between faults). Buildings in the zone of deformation would be damaged, particularly those straddling the main fault. Also, anything crossing the fault, such as transportation corridors, utilities, and other lifelines, both underground and above ground, can be damaged or broken. The ground can be dropped below the water table on the downdropped side, resulting in localized flooding. Surface fault rupture can also cause tectonic subsidence, which is the broad, permanent tilting of the valley floor down toward the fault scarp. Tilting can cause flooding along lake and reservoir shorelines nearest the fault; along altered stream courses; and along canals, sewer lines, or other gravity-flow systems where slope gradients are lessened or reversed. Where and when is surface fault rupture likely to occur? On the Holocene fault on which a magnitude 6.5 (approximate) or larger earthquake occurs. On average, these earthquakes may occur once every 120 years on various faults in the Wasatch Front region; once every 350 years somewhere along the central part of the Wasatch fault (between Brigham City and Nephi); once every 2,000 years at any specific locality along the central Wasatch fault; and once every 5,000 to 20,000 years or more on other Holocene faults in the state. What can be done to protect homes? Faults can be avoided by setting homes back a safe distance. Special-study areas have been delineated along faults where geologic studies are recommended to assess the hazard, locate faults, and recommend setbacks. However, the use of special-study areas in land-use ordinances varies by county and city, as does the level of enforcement. Therefore, buyers, particularly of older homes (pre-1985), should personally check available fault maps to see if the home is near a fault (within a few hundred feet) and, if so, may want a geological site investigation performed. For newer homes, buyers should check with the county or city to determine whether geologic studies were performed for the site or subdivision and, if so, look at a copy of the geologic report. Where to get additional information. Detailed fault and special-study-area maps used in ordinances are available at county and city planning departments. A statewide fault map is available from the Utah Geological Survey: Quaternary tectonics of Utah with emphasis on earthquake-hazard characterization, UGS Bulletin 127, by Suzanne Hecker, 1993. * For other earthquake hazards, including ground shaking, please see PI-29, PI-38, and PI-48. See our Quaternary Fault and Fold interactive map for up to date fault and earthquake information at https://geology.utah.gov/apps/qfaults/index.html.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Wasatch Fault
    The WasatchWasatchThe FaultFault UtahUtah Geological Geological Survey Survey PublicPublic Information Information Series Series 40 40 11 9 9 9 9 6 6 The WasatchWasatchThe FaultFault CONTENTS The ups and downs of the Wasatch fault . .1 What is the Wasatch fault? . .1 Where is the Wasatch fault? Globally ............................................................................................2 Regionally . .2 Locally .............................................................................................4 Surface expressions (how to recognize the fault) . .5 Land use - your fault? . .8 At a glance - geological relationships . .10 Earthquakes ..........................................................................................12 When/how often? . .14 Howbig? .........................................................................................15 Earthquake hazards . .15 Future probability of the "big one" . .16 Where to get additional information . .17 Selected bibliography . .17 Acknowledgments Text by Sandra N. Eldredge. Design and graphics by Vicky Clarke. Special thanks to: Walter Arabasz of the University of Utah Seismograph Stations for per- mission to reproduce photographs on p. 6, 9, II; Utah State University for permission to use the satellite image mosaic on the cover; Rebecca Hylland for her assistance; Gary Christenson, Kimm Harty, William Lund, Edith (Deedee) O'Brien, and Christine Wilkerson for their reviews; and James Parker for drafting. Research supported by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Department
    [Show full text]
  • Wasatch Fault
    WASATCH FAULT NORTHERN POI=ITION Raymond Lundgren WOODWARD· CLYDE ASSOCIATES George E.Hervert & B. A. Vallerga CONSULTING SOIL ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS SAN FRANCISCO - OAKLAND - SAN JOSE OFFICES Wm.T.Black Lloyd S. Cluff Edward Margeson 2730 Adeline Street Keshavan Nair Oakland, Ca 94607 Lewis L.Oriard (415) 444-1256 Mahmut OtU5 C.J.VanTiI P. O. Box 24075 Oaklllnd, ea 94623 July 17, 1970 Project G-12069 Utah Geological and Mineralogical Survey 103 Utah Geological Survey Building University of Utah Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 Attention: Dr. William P. Hewitt Director Gentlemen: WASATCH FAULT - NORTHERN PORTION EARTHQUAKE FAULT INVESTIGATION AND EVALUATION The enclosed report and maps presents the results at our investigation and evaluation of the Wasatch fault from near Draper to Brigham City, Utah. The completion of this work marks another important step in Utah's forward-looking approach to minimizing the effects of earthquake and geologic hazards. We are proud to have been associated with the Utah Geological and Mineralogical Survey in completing this study, and we appreciate the opportunity of assisting you with such an inter­ esting and challenging problem. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, {4lJ~ Lloyd S. Cluff Vice President and Chief Engineering Geologist LSC: jh Enclosure LOS ANGELES-ORANGE' SAN DIEGO' NEW YORK-CLIFTON' DENVER' KANSAS CITY-ST. LOUIS' PHILADELPHIA-WASHINGTON Affiliated with MATERIALS RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, INC. WASATCH FAULT NORTHERN PORTION EARTHBUAKE FAULT INVESTIGATION & EVALUATION av LLOYO S. CLUFF. GEORGE E. BROGAN & CARL E. GLASS PROPERll Of mAR GEOLOGICAL AND. MINfBAlOGICAL SURVEY A GUIDE·TO LAND USE PLANNING FOR UTAH GEOLOGICAL & MINERALOGICAL SURVEY WOODWARD- CLYDE & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS OAKLAND.
    [Show full text]
  • Quaternary Tectonics of Utah with Emphasis on Earthquake-Hazard Characterization
    QUATERNARY TECTONICS OF UTAH WITH EMPHASIS ON EARTHQUAKE-HAZARD CHARACTERIZATION by Suzanne Hecker Utah Geologiral Survey BULLETIN 127 1993 UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY a division of UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 0 STATE OF UTAH Michael 0. Leavitt, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Ted Stewart, Executive Director UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY M. Lee Allison, Director UGSBoard Member Representing Lynnelle G. Eckels ................................................................................................... Mineral Industry Richard R. Kennedy ................................................................................................. Civil Engineering Jo Brandt .................................................................................................................. Public-at-Large C. Williatn Berge ...................................................................................................... Mineral Industry Russell C. Babcock, Jr.............................................................................................. Mineral Industry Jerry Golden ............................................................................................................. Mineral Industry Milton E. Wadsworth ............................................................................................... Economics-Business/Scientific Scott Hirschi, Director, Division of State Lands and Forestry .................................... Ex officio member UGS Editorial Staff J. Stringfellow .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for an Active Shear Zone in Southern Nevada Linking the Wasatch Fault to the Eastern California Shear Zone
    Evidence for an active shear zone in southern Nevada linking the Wasatch fault to the Eastern California shear zone Corné Kreemer, Geoffrey Blewitt, and William C. Hammond Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, and Nevada Seismological Laboratory, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557-0178, USA ABSTRACT In this study, our aim is to elucidate how present-day localized exten- Previous studies have shown that ~5% of the Pacifi c–North sion is transferred southward and westward from the Wasatch Fault zone America relative plate motion is accommodated in the eastern part by (1) analyzing data from continuous GPS stations, and (2) modeling of the Great Basin (western United States). Near the Wasatch fault the present-day strain rate tensor fi eld based on those GPS velocities and zone and other nearby faults, deformation is currently concentrated additional constraints from earthquake focal mechanisms. Considering the within a narrow zone of extension coincident with the eastern margin limited number of high-quality, long-running geodetic monuments, sig- of the northern Basin and Range. Farther south, the pattern of active nifi cant new insight can only be gained through integration of the comple- deformation implied by faulting and seismicity is more enigmatic. To mentary geodetic and moment tensor data sets. Our results provide new assess how present-day strain is accommodated farther south and insight into the question as to whether strain is being accommodated along how this relates to the regional kinematics, we analyze data from narrow zones separating rigid crustal blocks, such as farther to the north, continuous global positioning system (GPS) stations and model the or in a more diffuse manner, as it has over most of the history of the Basin strain rate tensor fi eld using the horizontal GPS velocities and earth- and Range.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoseismologic Investigations of the Hurricane Fault in Northwestern Arizona and Southwestern Utah
    Paleoseismologic Investigations of the Hurricane Fault in Northwestern Arizona and Southwestern Utah Heidi D. Stenner1,3, William R. Lund2, Philip A. Pearthree1, Benjamin L. Everitt4 Arizona Geological Survey Open-File Report 99-8 April 1999 Reformatted and revised, May, 2005 1Arizona Geological Survey, 416 W. Congress St. Tucson, AZ 85701 2Utah Geological Survey, Southern Utah Regional Office 3Department of Geology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287 4Utah Department of Water Resources "Research supported by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Department of the Interior, under USGS award number (Arizona Geological Survey, 1434-HQ-97-GR-03047). The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government." TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 ABSTRACT 3 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 6 CHAPTER 2. RECONNAISSANCE PALEOSEISMIC INVESTIGATION OF THE HURRICANE FAULT IN SOUTHWESTERN UTAH 45 CHAPTER 3. PALEOSEISMOLOGY OF THE SOUTHERN ANDERSON JUNCTION SECTION OF THE HURRICANE FAULT, NORTHWESTERN ARIZONA AND SOUTHWESTERN UTAH 81 CHAPTER 4. LATE QUATERNARY FAULTING ON THE WHITMORE CANYON SECTION OF THE HURRICANE FAULT, NORTHWESTERN ARIZONA 99 REFERENCES CITED 106 APPENDICES 2 ABSTRACT We have completed initial paleoseismologic investigations to evaluate the recency and size of paleoearthquakes and long-term slip rates on the Hurricane fault in southern Utah and northern Arizona (SUNA). The Hurricane fault is a long, west-dipping normal fault with substantial late Cenozoic displacement within the structural and seismic transition between the Colorado Plateau and the Basin and Range province. Previous reconnaissance studies of the fault in northern Arizona and southern Utah had documented evidence of late Quaternary activity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Basin-Colorado Plateau Transition in Central Utah
    Utah Geological Association Publication 30 - Pacific Section American Association of Petroleum Geologists Publication GB78 1 GREAT BASIN-COLORADO PLATEAU TRANSITION IN CENTRAL UTAH: AN INTERFACE BETWEEN ACTIVE EXTENSION AND STABLE INTERIOR PHILIP E. WANNAMAKER1, JOHN M. BARTLEY2, ANNE F. SHEEHAN3, CRAIG H. JONES3, ANTHONY R. LOWRY4, TREVOR A. DUMITRU5, TODD A. EHLERS2, W. STEVEN HOLBROOK6, G. LANG FARMER3, MARTYN J. UNSWORTH7, DARRELL B. HALL2, DAVID S. CHAPMAN2, DAVID A. OKAYA8, BARBARA E. JOHN6, AND JACK A. WOLFE9 ABSTRACT A fundamental tectonic boundary appears to have existed below the site of the present-day Colorado Plateau to Great Basin Transition Zone since Precambrian times. The Plateau proper has seen little deformation since Middle Proterozoic conti- nental assembly apart from Cenozoic uplift and limited thick-skinned contraction and calc-alkaline plutonism. In contrast, the Great Basin region has been subject to repeated episodes of both contractional and extensional tectonism, and extensional activity continues into the modern day. Evidence exists that the Colorado Plateau at its western margin is being converted to lithosphere with rifted Great Basin properties. Some models for migrating extension call upon progressive gravitational collapse of thicker crust of the plateau margin as it warms, possibly aided by hardening of the previously rifted lithosphere (i.e., Great Basin interior) via crustal thinning and cooling. However, this rather homogeneous and temporally gradual model of deformation has only partial applicability to evolu- tion of the western Colorado Plateau and eastern Great Basin. On the one hand, the limited degree of block style faulting, high elevation, and high apparent elastic thickness of the Transition Zone resemble properties of the Colorado Plateau.
    [Show full text]
  • Distributed Deformation Across the Rio Grande Rift, Great Plains, and Colorado Plateau
    Geology, 40(1), 23-26, 2012 Distributed Deformation across the Rio Grande Rift, Great Plains, and Colorado Plateau Henry T. Berglund1, Anne F. Sheehan2, Mark H. Murray3, Mousumi Roy4, Anthony R. Lowry5, R. Steven Nerem6, and Frederick Blume1 1UNAVCO Inc, 6350 Nautilus Drive, Boulder, Colorado 80301-5553, USA 2Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0399, USA 3Department of Earth and Environmental Science, New Mexico Tech, Socorro, New Mexico 87801, USA 4Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131-1116, USA 5Department of Geology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322-4505, USA 6Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0429, USA ABSTRACT We use continuous measurements of GPS sites from across the Rio Grande Rift, Great Plains, and Colorado Plateau to estimate present-day surface velocities and strain rates. Velocity gradients from five east-west profiles suggest an average of ~1.2 nanostrains/yr east-west extensional strain rate across these three physiographic provinces. The extensional deformation is not concentrated in a narrow zone centered on the Rio Grande Rift but rather is distributed broadly from the western edge of the Colorado Plateau well into the western Great Plains. This unexpected pattern of broadly distributed deformation at the surface has important implications for our understanding of how low strain-rate deformation within continental interiors is accommodated. INTRODUCTION Global positioning system (GPS) monuments installed for the EarthScope Plate Boundary Observatory (PBO) and the Rio Grande Rift GPS experiment (Fig. 1) have greatly enhanced modern geodetic coverage of the physiographic regions of the Rio Grande Rift and the Colorado Plateau.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT U.S. Geological Survey External Grant
    FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT U.S. Geological Survey External Grant Award Number G17AP00001 Grand Period: December 1, 2016 to November 31, 2017 DETAILED MAPPING OF THE WASATCH FAULT ZONE, UTAH AND IDAHO— USING NEW HIGH-RESOLUTION LIDAR DATA TO REDUCE EARTHQUAKE RISK Greg N. McDonald, Adam I. Hiscock, Emily J. Kleber, and Steve D. Bowman Utah Geological Survey 1594 W. North Temple P.O. Box 146100 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-6100 (801) 537-3383, fax (801) 537-3400 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] http://geology.utah.gov/ March 30, 2018 Although this product represents the work of professional scientists, the Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, makes no warranty, expressed or implied, regarding its suitability for a particular use. The Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, shall not be liable under any circumstances for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages with respect to claims by users of this product. This project was funded by the Utah Geological Survey and the U.S. Geological Survey, National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program, through USGS NEHRP award number G17AP00001 (2016). The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government. TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aquifer Deformation and Active Faulting in Salt Lake Valley, Utah
    Earth and Planetary Science Letters 547 (2020) 116471 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth and Planetary Science Letters www.elsevier.com/locate/epsl Aquifer deformation and active faulting in Salt Lake Valley, Utah, USA ∗ Xie Hu a,b, , Roland Bürgmann a,b a Berkeley Seismological Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-4760, USA b Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-4767, USA a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Aquifers and fault zones may interact through groundwater flow and stress redistribution, yet their Received 4 May 2020 spatiotemporal relationship remains enigmatic. Here we quantify changes in water storage and associated Received in revised form 1 July 2020 stress along the Wasatch Fault Zone in Salt Lake Valley, recently shaken by a M5.7 earthquake on Accepted 9 July 2020 March 18th, 2020. Ground deformation mapped by Sentinel-1 SAR imagery (2014-2019) reveals an Available online xxxx 3 elongated area with ∼50-mm seasonal uplift corresponding to 0.03-0.06-km water storage cycles. Phase Editor: R. Bendick shifts across active faults in both water level and deformation suggest control by the low-permeability Keywords: structures. The seasonal stress changes on the adjoining faults from poroelastic volume strain are two aquifer storage orders of magnitude larger than those from hydrological surface loading, but both are small compared to seasonal deformation the annual increase of tectonic loading at seismogenic depths. Historic seismic events, limited in number, volume strain do not exhibit statistically significant annual periodicity and hydrological modulation of microseismicity InSAR or triggering of the recent M5.7 event is not evident.
    [Show full text]
  • To: Mr. Michael Johnson Director of Community and Economic Development City of Cottonwood Heights Mr. Adam Ginsberg Staff Engine
    14425 South Center Point Way, Bluffdale, Utah 84065 T: (801) 501-0583 ~ [email protected] To: Mr. Michael Johnson Director of Community and Economic Development City of Cottonwood Heights Mr. Adam Ginsberg Staff Engineer Public Works, City of Cottonwood Heights From: Timothy J. Thompson, P.G., Principal Geologist 8-24-2020 Date: August 24, 2020 Subject: Response to Public Comments Provided to Cottonwood Heights City in a Power Point Presentation Addressing the Geologic Hazards Concerns at the AJ Rock LLC Property 6695 South Wasatch Boulevard Cottonwood Heights, Utah Introduction At the request of Mr. Michael Johnson and Mr. Adam Ginsberg, GeoStrata reviewed the public comments provided to Cottonwood Heights City in a Power Point Presentation that presents geologic hazards concerns about the “Geologic Hazards Evaluation AJ Rock LLC Property 6695 South Wasatch Boulevard Cottonwood Heights, Utah” prepared by Western Geologic & Environmental LLC (Western Geologic) and dated May 11, 2020. We also considered the Gordon Geotechnical Engineering (G2) geotechnical report titled “Geotechnical Study and Slope Stability Analysis Proposed Wasatch Rock Development 6695 Wasatch Boulevard Cottonwood Heights, Utah” and dated May 13, 2020 in our response to the public comment questions and Power Point Presentation. Our response to the public comment questions and Power Point Presentation are provided to Cottonwood Heights City to assist the city in protecting public health, safety, and welfare. The purposes of our comments are to address the public comments and provide our professional opinions to the city on the concerns raised in the Power Point Presentation. At issue is whether or not the report adequately addresses the geologic hazards associated with the AJ Rock LLC Property project consistent with reasonable standards of practice and in accordance with Cottonwood Heights City’s Sensitive Lands Evaluation & Development Standards (SLEDS) (Title 19 Chapter 19.72 of the Cottonwood Heights City Municipal code).
    [Show full text]
  • Geological and Geophysical Data By
    Segmentation of the Wasatch Fault Zone, Utah­ Summaries, Analyses, and Interpretations of Geological and Geophysical Data By RUSSELL L. WHEELER and KATHERINE B. KRYSTINIK Descriptions, with supporting evidence, of segment boundaries as they are expressed in gravity, aeromagnetic, seismological, fault-geometric, topographic, and structural data U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1827 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1988 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Wheeler, Russell L. Segmentation of the Wasatch fault zone, Utah-summaries, analyses, and interpretations of geological and geophysical data. (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1827) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.3:1827 1. Faults (Geology)-Utah. I. Krystinik, Katherine B. II. Title. Ill. Title: Wasatch fault zone, Utah. IV. Series. QE75.B9 no. 1827 557.3 s [551.8' 7' 097922] 87-600430 [QE606.5.U6] CONTENTS Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Criteria that the data must satisfy 2 Bouguer gravity data 3 Introduction 3 Procedures 4 Results 6 Aeromagnetic data 6 Introduction 6 Procedures 7 Results 9 Earthquake epicenters 10 Introduction 10 Procedures 11 Results 12 Salients 13 Introduction 13 Procedures 15 Results 15 Topographic data
    [Show full text]
  • Surficial Geologic Map of the Weber Segment, Wasatch Fault Zone, Weber and Davis Counties, Utah
    U.S. DEPAR1MENT OF THE INTERIOR MISCELLANEOUS INVESTIGATIONS SERIES U.S. GEOLOOICAL SURVEY MAP I-2199 PAMPHLET SURFICIAL GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE WEBER SEGMENT, WASATCH FAULT ZONE, WEBER AND DAVIS COUNTIES, UTAH By Alan R. Nelson and Stephen F. Personius Overview Schwartz and Coppersmith (1984), identified six dis­ crete fault segments, but recent work by a consortium of investigators has identified 10 or 11 segments (Ma­ This map, the fourth in a series of 1:50,000-scale chette and others, 1987, 1989, in press; Wheeler and maps of the Wasatch fault zone, depicts the surficial Krystinik, 1988). In northern Utah, the Ogden and deposits and faults along the Weber segment and part Collinston segments of Schwartz and Coppersmith of the adjacent Salt Lake City segment of the Wasatch (1984) have been separated into three new segments fault zone in northern Utah (fig. 1). This is the first map (fig. 1); northward from Salt Lake City, the Weber, that is sufficiently detailed to be useful for interpreting Brigham City, and Collinston segments have been de­ the paleoseismic history of this part of the Wasatch fault lineated (Personius, 1986, 1988a; Machette and others, zone. The map is also a guide to the best sites for future 1987, 1989, 1992). Nelson and Personius (1987) detailed studies of paleoearthquake magnitude and suggested that the Pleasant View salient at the northern recurrence on the segment. These types of geologic end of the Weber segment is a non-conservative barrier, studies will form a quantitative basis for earthquake and Bruhn and others (1987, p. 345) described the Salt hazard assessment along the Wasatch Front.
    [Show full text]