DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report and Financial Statements 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report and Financial Statements 2011 Annual Report and Financial Statements 2011 i Contents Board of Trustees iii Our Core Statements iv List of Abbreviations and Acronyms v Chairman’s Statement vi Director’s Statement viii Wildlife Conservation 1 Law Enforcement 8 Service Delivery 12 Wangari Maathai 18 Financial Statements 24 KWS Park Visitor Numbers 43 List of Partners 44 KWS Contact Addresses 46 ii Board of Trustees Hon David Mwiraria Margaret Wawuda Julius Kipng`etich Chairman Vice Chair Director Winnie Kiiru Dr Thomas Manga Edward Ngigi Member Member Member Gideon Gathaara David Mbugua Ian Craig Rep. Permanent Secretary Member Member Ministry of Forestry and Wildlife iii Board of Trustees Felix Oulo Hassan Noor Hassan Patricia Awori Member Member Member Nicholas Ole Kamwaro Adil Khawaja Stephen Karani Member Member Rep. PS Ministry of Finance Julius Ndegwa Mutea Iringo Rep. Commissioner of Police Rep. PS Office of the President and Internal Security iv Our Core Statements To be a world leader in wildlife conservation To sustainably conserve and manage Kenya’s wildlife and its habitats in collaboration with stakeholders for posterity Our Vision At KWS, we conserve and manage Kenya’s wildlife scientifically, responsively and professionally. We do this Ourwith integrity, Mission recognising and encouraging staff creativity and continuous learning and teamwork inpartnership with communities and stakeholders. Value Statement v List of Abbreviations and Acronyms AP Administration Police BATUK British Army Training Unit in Kenya CITES Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora COYA Company Of the Year Awards GPS Global Positioning System GSU General Service Unit IFAW International Fund for Animal Welfare INTERPOL International Criminal Police Organisation ISO International Organisation for Standardisation KICC Kenyatta International Conference Centre KRB Kenya Roads Board KTF Kenya Tourism Federation KWS Kenya Wildlife Service LATF Lusaka Agreement Task Force MFTS Manyani Field Training School MIKE Monitoring the Illegal Killing of Elephants MIST Management Information System NCAS National Carbon Accounting System NEMA National Environmental Management Authority NRT Northern Rangelands Trust PDP Part Development Plans RMMS Road Maintenance Management System USAID United States Agency for International Development vi Chairman’s Statement wenty eleven was a year of continued change – most of it positive – within KWS and in its mode of operation. This report details the work we have done in the three main areas that are central to our mandate: wildlife conservation; law enforcement insofar as it applies to conserving our natural heritage; and delivery of our services to the community at large. To this, I should add one crucial dimension to our work, the involvement of local communities in the benefits of wildlife conservation. Whether it is through the development was once perceived. We are no longer an of new nature-based enterprises or the ‘authority’ that coerces local communities financial ‘trickle down’ effect of low into cooperation: instead they are impact, high spending tourists, wildlife encouraged to ‘buy in’ to the notion of conservation should be seen as a critical conservation for their own prosperity and supplement to traditional livestock well-being. Locals are the custodians of grazing. It is for this reason that 2011was Kenya’s wildlife heritage, and far more designated as the Year of Communities. still needs to be done to recognise the importance of those who live closest to the To this end, we have embarked on a number wild animals, both within and adjacent to of programmes that assist communities protected areas. living with wildlife, including the Maasai, Samburu and other ethnic groups within It needs also to be understood that the Northern Rangelands. These include although KWS is not perceived as a money- Tthe development of small eco-tourism making organisation, the fulfilment of businesses making use of wildlife as its mandate supports many commercial, a resource. Although the budget for tax-paying enterprises in the tourism supporting projects in local communities sector, not to mention the hundreds of has been increased by 50% this year, it international broadcast camera crews remains pitifully small given the crucial that visit this country every year. This importance that local communities can indirect contribution to the country’s play in conserving the nation’s wildlife economy needs to be recognised, so that heritage. the Service’s revenue from conservation fees adequately supplemented by support Working with local communities has from the Government and international involved a change in the way that KWS development partners. vii With this in mind, the KWS Endowment and educating the people at home and Fund was established in 2010 to provide abroad on the critical importance of a long term, sustainable source of funding maintaining adequate forest cover in the for wildlife conservation and its habitats. country are an example to anyone who Anyone can contribute to this fund, cares about the future of Kenya’s natural from corporate entities to individuals. In heritage. A tribute to her is contained in supporting the Endowment Fund, you this report. will have assisted a cause that has a positive impact on future generations of Kenyans Otherwise, I am privileged to invite you and visitors to this country. Details of the to read through our accomplishments in Fund and how to support it can be found detail. I hope that this will inspire you to on our website www.kws.go.ke. sustain your interest in the Service and give us support wherever you can. KWS also acknowledges the work of Wangari Maathai, an outstanding conservationist who passed away in 2011. Hon David Mwiraria, EGH Her tireless efforts in halting desertification Chairman, KWS Board of Trustees. viii Director’s Statement he year 2011 has seen a subtle but important paradigm shift in the articulation of our mission. We have realigned our Strategic Plan away from aspiring to be a world leader in wildlife – a task that we feel has largely been accomplished – towards ‘saving the last great species and spaces on earth for humanity ’. This puts greater emphasis on the urgency of protecting our natural heritage from the threats of growing population, climate change, wildlife crime and abuse of the environment. Operationally, we have invested heavily in Although we continue to market our capacity building, particularly in training wildlife heritage in its entirety both at those staff in the technical skills necessary home and abroad, we are keen to spread to discharge their duties effectively in the financial risk and ecological burden the field. These include wildlife data arising from having too many tourists gathering and analysis, community in some parks and not enough in others. relations and a variety of skills relating to Currently, 80% of all park visitors frequent safety and security. At the same time, we just five of our 65 protected areas – Lake shall in mid-2012 be implementing a pay Nakuru, Amboseli, the Tsavos , and the structure for our staff that will represent a Aberdares. To redress the balance, we are marked improvement in terms for them. structuring Park fees and aligning our marketing to encourage visitors to Mount We are also working hard to improve Kenya, the Nairobi National Park, Hell’s internal efficiencies in anticipation of a Gate, the Kisumu Impala Sanctuary and Trather sluggish year ahead for the tourism the Marine Parks on the coast. We have industry: there is little doubt that the also established a new rhino sanctuary in global financial crisis will have an impact Ruma National Park in Nyanza Region. on the number of visitors from Europe, This, we hope, will bring more tourists to who have traditionally been among our the Western circuit. major contributors in. However, local marketing continues to yield dividends A couple of landmark events during the in the number of domestic tourists, who year included the burning of illegally now comprise 64% of all visitors to the acquired ivory in Tsavo West National Parks. This represents a marked increased Park. This was presided over by our over previous years. Head of State, and attended by eminent conservationists and parties to the Lusaka ix Agreement Task Force, a regional wildlife The country’s wildlife heritage will be law enforcement agency, of which Kenya considerably safer when this Act is endorsed is a member. Another key achievement was by Parliament, and the sooner it can be the acquisition of Laikipia National Park, done, the better. a 17,000 acre migratory corridor between Laikipia and Samburu that has hitherto Collaboration with partners at home been unprotected. One particularly and abroad has always been important innovative method of adapting land for to us, and we are now sharing our skills wildlife is the notion of ‘voluntary land with organisations in Tanzania, Ethiopia, easement’, in which the landowner agrees Uganda, Zambia and the Congo. This to restrict its use to be compatible with year we have seconded staff to Republican wildlife conservation for an agreed period. of Southern Sudan, which has enormous This has been done with land adjacent to parks whose management is understandably Nairobi National Park, and we plan to still in its infancy. The fact that our skills extend this model to other wildlife areas in are recognised so extensively abroad is the country. testament to the quality of our professionals and the strength of the KWS brand. In addition to involving local communities in our management decisions, we are also KWS is an enthusiastic supporter of the doing our best to encourage responsible country’s Vision 2030, and we are currently tourism by training KWS staff to educate well on track with fulfilling our own visitors on the importance of sensitive undertakings in this respect: cultivating behaviour. This includes avoidance of the concept of ‘Premium Parks’ at Lake animal teasing, dropping of litter and Nakuru and Amboseli with the aim of driving in prohibited areas.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Kenya Wildlife Service at Its Best
    ihe Kenya wild Life service Iru the 2±st century: "Protective cqlobally significant Areas and Resoutrces The George Wright Forum The GWS Journal of Parks, Protected Areas & Cultural Sites volume 29 number 1 • 2012 Origins Founded in 1980, the George Wright Society is organized for the pur­ poses of promoting the application of knowledge, fostering communica­ tion, improving resource management, and providing information to improve public understanding and appreciation of the basic purposes of natural and cultural parks and equivalent reserves. The Society is dedicat­ ed to the protection, preservation, and management of cultural and natu­ ral parks and reserves through research and education. Mission The George Wright Society advances the scientific and heritage values of parks and protected areas. The Society promotes professional research and resource stewardship across natural and cultural disciplines, provides avenues of communication, and encourages public policies that embrace these values. Our Goal The Society strives to be the premier organization connecting people, places, knowledge, and ideas to foster excellence in natural and cultural resource management, research, protection, and interpretation in parks and equivalent reserves. Board of Directors BRENT A. MITCHELL, PRESIDENT • Ipswich, Massachusetts MOLLY N. ROSS, VICE PRESIDENT • Arlington, Virginia DAVIDJ. PARSONS, SECRETARY • Florence, Montana GARY E. DAVIS, TREASURER • Thousand Oaks, California BRAD BARR • Woods Hole, Massachusetts NATHALIE GAGNON • Ottawa, Ontario BARRETT KENNEDY • Baton Rouge, Louisiana FRANKJ. PRIZNAR • Gaithersburg, Maryland JANW. VAN WAGTEN'DONK • El Portal, California JOHN WAITHAKA • Ottawa, Ontario LYNN WILSON • Cobble Hill, British Columbia GRADUATE STUDENT LIAISON TO THE BOARD CARENA J. VAN RIPER • College Station, Texas Executive Office DAVID HARMON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR EMILY DEKKER-FIALA, CONFERENCE COORDINATOR P.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya in Crisis
    KENYA IN CRISIS Africa Report N°137 – 21 February 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 II. THE ELECTION CRISIS ............................................................................................. 2 A. A TIGHT AND TENSE RACE ...................................................................................................2 1. Coalition building ......................................................................................................3 2. The issues...................................................................................................................4 B. THE RIGGING OF THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION ....................................................................6 III. THE SECURITY CRISIS.............................................................................................. 9 A. PROTEST AND REPRESSION....................................................................................................9 B. ESCALATION IN THE RIFT VALLEY ......................................................................................10 1. The rise of Kalenjin warriors in the North Rift .......................................................11 2. The return of Mungiki..............................................................................................13 3. Coast Province: the next theatre of violence?..........................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya Soe Ch4 A
    PART 2 STATE OF THE ENVIRONMENT 61 CHAPTER BIODIVERSITY4 Introduction The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) defi nes biodiversity as Kenya’s rich biodiversity Lead Authors ‘the variability among living organisms from all sources including, can be attributed to a number Ali A. Ali and Monday S. Businge among others, terrestrial, marine and other aquatic ecosystems and of factors, including a long Contributing Authors S. M. Mutune, Jane Kibwage, Ivy Achieng, the ecological complexes of which they are part [and] includes diversity evolutionary history, variable Godfrey Mwangi, David Ongare, Fred Baraza, within species, between species and of ecosystems.’ Biodiversity climatic conditions, and diverse Teresa Muthui, Lawrence M. Ndiga, Nick Mugi therefore comprises genetic and species diversity of animals and plants habitat types and ecosystems. Reviewer as well as ecosystem diversity. Kenya is endowed with an enormous The major biodiversity Nathan Gichuki diversity of ecosystems and wildlife species which live in the terrestrial, concentration sites fall within aquatic and aerial environment. These biological resources are the existing protected areas fundamental to national prosperity as a source of food, medicines, network (national parks, reserves and sanctuaries) which are mostly energy, shelter, employment and foreign exchange. For instance, managed by the Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS). However, over 70 percent agricultural productivity and development are dependent on the of the national biodiversity occurs outside the protected areas. availability of a wide variety of plant and animal genetic resources and In spite of its immense biotic capital, Kenya experiences severe on the existence of functional ecological systems, especially those that ecological and socio-economic problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Management Strategy for the Elephant in Kenya 2012-2021
    Conservation and Management Strategy for the Elephant in Kenya 2012-2021 Compiled by: Moses Litoroh, Patrick Omondi, Richard Kock and Rajan Amin Plate 4. Winds 2 Family crossing the Ewaso Ng’iro River, Samburu National Reserve - Lucy King, Save the Elephants ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, we thank the Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) Director, Julius Kipng’etich and KWS Board of Trustees for approving this as a priority activity amongst the core business of KWS. Conservation and We also sincerely thank Keith Lindsay, Winnie Kiiru and Noah Sitati for preparing Management Strategy the background information and facilitating the eleven consultative for the Elephant stakeholder-workshops that were held across the country. This ensured the in Kenya views of as many stakeholders as possible were accommodated into this strategy document. Special thanks to all the stakeholders of the final strategy 2012-2021 development workshop, held at Mpala Research Centre, Nanyuki, which © Kenya Wildlife Service included representatives from United Republic of Tanzania; Uganda Government and the Government of Southern Sudan that finally formulated this National Elephant Management and Conservation Strategy. Our sincere gratitude also to the following individuals for reviewing the first draft : Munira Anyonge Bashir, Julian Blanc, Holly Dublin, Francis Gakuya, Ian Douglas-Hamilton, Ben Kavu, Juliet King, Lucy King, Margaret Kinnaird, Ben Okita, Lamin Seboko, Noah Sitati, Diane Skinner, Richard Vigne and David Western. Frontcover: We are greatly indebted to the following institutions for funding the formulation of this strategy : Born Free Foundation; CITES MIKE Programme; Darwin Initiative Plate 1. African Elephant. Samantha Roberts, Zoological / CETRAD; KWS; People’s Trust for Endangered Species; Tusk Trust; United States Society of London Fish and Wildlife Service; World Wildlife Fund (EARPO) and Zoological Society of London (ZSL).
    [Show full text]
  • MARA CHEETAH CUBS REPORT Cee4life
    MARA CHEETAH CUBS REPORT Risk of Local Extinction of Cheetah in the Mara Ecosystem, Animal Welfare Issue at Nairobi Orphanage and Alleged Illegal Cub Trade in Kenya A Report on the Mara Cheetah Cubs Removal, the Critical Status of Mara Cheetah and the Ethics of Captive Care Facilitated and par-cipated in by: cee4life MARA CHEETAH CUBS REPORT Risk of Local Extinction of Cheetah in the Mara Ecosystem, Animal Welfare Issue at Nairobi Orphanage and Alleged Illegal Cub Trade in Kenya Facilitated and par-cipated in by: cee4life.org Melbourne Victoria, Australia +61409522054 http://www.cee4life.org/ [email protected] 2 Contents Section 1 Introduction!!!!!!!! !!1.1 Location!!!!!!!!5 !!1.2 Methods!!!!!!!!5! Section 2 Cheetahs Status in Kenya!! ! ! ! ! !!2.1 Cheetah Status in Kenya!!!!!!5 !!2.2 Cheetah Status in the Masai Mara!!!!!6 !!2.3 Mara Cheetah Population Decline!!!!!7 Section 3 Mara Cub Rescue!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!3.1 Abandoned Cub Rescue!!!!!!9 !!3.2 The Mother Cheetah!!!!!!10 !!3.3 Initial Capture & Protocols!!!!!!11 !!3.4 Rehabilitation Program Design!!!!!11 !!3.5 Human Habituation Issue!!!!!!13 Section 4 Mara Cub Removal!!!!!!! !!4.1 The Relocation of the Cubs Animal Orphanage!!!15! !!4.2 The Consequence of the Mara Cub Removal!!!!16 !!4.3 The Truth Behind the Mara Cub Removal!!!!16 !!4.4 Past Captive Cheetah Advocations!!!!!18 Section 5 Cheetah Rehabilitation!!!!!!! !!5.1 Captive Wild Release of Cheetahs!!!!!19 !!5.2 Historical Cases of Cheetah Rehabilitation!!!!19 !!5.3 Cheetah Rehabilitation in Kenya!!!!!20 Section 6 KWS Justifications
    [Show full text]
  • Using Tows Matrix As a Strategic Decision-Making Tool in Managing KWS Product Portfolio
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319351999 Using Tows Matrix as a Strategic Decision-Making Tool in Managing KWS Product Portfolio Article · August 2017 CITATIONS READS 0 2,950 1 author: Mary Mugo Multimedia University College of Kenya 9 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Mary Mugo on 07 September 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Using Tows Matrix as a Strategic Decision-Making Tool in Managing KWS Product Portfolio 1. Mugo Mary 2. Kamau Florence 3. Mukabi Mary 4. Kemunto Christine 1. Multimedia University of Kenya 2. Multimedia University of Kenya 3. Multimedia University of Kenya 4. Multimedia University of Kenya Abstract In today's changing business environment, product portfolio management is a vital issue. Majority of companies are developing, applying and attaining better results from managing their product portfolio effectively, as the success of any organization is dependent on how well it manages its products and services especially in an unpredictable business environment. The aim of this study was to understand the concept of SWOT analysis as a decision making tool that can be used to manage the product portfolio of Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) with the aim of maximizing returns and staying competitive in a dynamic business environment. The study was conducted in the eight KWS conservation areas. Primary data was collected through semi structured questionnaires and in depth interviews. Collected data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Research findings revealed that each conservancy had its own strengths, weaknesses, threats, and opportunities; some unique and others similar.
    [Show full text]
  • Kakamega National Reserve Is Accessible by All Vehicles All Year Round
    CAMPING For the more adventurous visitors, camping can never be wilder here. With guaranteed round the clock security, every second would be worth your money. Visitors can camp at the nearby Udo campsite. A number of campsites are located in the park. Please contact the warden or call KWS HQfor more information WHEN TO GO Kakamega National Reserve is accessible by all vehicles all year round. However to enjoy the beauty of the park visitors are advised to walk through the forest. WHAT TO TAKE WITH YOU Drinking water, picnic items and camping gear if you intend to stay overnight. Also useful are binoculars, camera, hat, and hiking boots. Visitors should be prepared for wet weather and wear footwear adequate for muddy and uneven trails. PLEASE RESPECT THE WILDLIFE CODE Respect the privacy of the wildlife, this is their habitat. Beware ofthe animals, they are wild and can be unpredictable. Don't crowd the animals or make sudden noises or movements. Don't feed the animals, it upsets their diet and leads to human dependence. Keep quiet, noise disturbs the wildlife and may antagonize your fellow visitors. Never drive off-road, this severely damages the habitat. When viewing wildlife keep to a minimum distance of 20 meters and pull to the side of the road so as to allow others to pass. KENYA WILDLIFE SERVICE PARKS AND RESERVES Leave no litter and never leave fires unattended or discard burning objects. • ABERDARE NATIONAL PARK. AMBOSELI NATIONAL PARK. ARABUKO SOKOKE NATIONAL RESERVE. Respect the cultural heritage of Kenya, nevertake pictures of the local people or • CENTRAL & SOUTHERN ISLAND NATIONAL PARK.
    [Show full text]
  • KO RA N Ationalpark, Asako Village,Kenya
    A B K George Adamson loved Kora as one of the last true y O T s wildernesses in Kenya. Inaccessible, thorny and o boiling hot as it was, it was ideal refuge for him, n a R y his lions and his ideals although he was under F k enormous pressure from Somali tribesmen, their i A t stock and their guns. Ultimately he fell to their z o j guns, but that was something we were both o h N prepared to accept for the privilege of the way of n v life there and what we were able to achieve. a i George desperately wanted me to continue his l t l work there and to make sure that all our efforts George Adamson’s camp, rebuilt by GAWPT a i had not been in vain. It was out of the question at o the time as the politics then were in disarray and I g n had taken on The Mkomazi Project in Tanzania in e George’s name, which was and still is a difficult a and time-consuming task with never an end in , sight. l K P Times have changed. Domestic stock is still a e problem in Kora with on going pastoral incursions. a n But the Kenya Wildlife Services (KWS) are r y determined to rehabilitate Kora as part of the k Meru conservation area. They have a multi- a , disciplinary approach to the problem and we are George Adamson at Kora 1987 . confident that they will make it work. Poaching of – Photographers International the large mammals has abated almost completely.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruma National Park Management Plan, 2012-2017
    Ruma National Park Management Plan, 2012-2017 The dramatic valley of the roan antelope, oribi and so much more..... Ruma National Park Management Plan, 2011-2016 Planning carried out by Ruma National Park Managers and KWS Biodiversity Planning and Environmental Compliance Department In accordance with the KWS Planning Standard Oper- ating Procedures Acknowledgements This General Management Plan has been developed by a Planning Team comprising Park Wardens, Area Scientists and KWS Headquarters Resource Planners. The Planning Team Name Designation Station/Organisation Apollo Kariuki Senior Resource Pla nner KWS Headquarters John Wambua Park Warden -Ruma NP Ruma National Park Fredrick Lala SRS -WCA Western Conserv ation Area Shadrack Ngene SRS -Elephant programme KWS Headquarters Timothy Ikime ARS -Kisumu Impala Kisumu Station Israel Makau RS -WCA Western Conservation Area Kanyi L. Rukaria ARS -Ruma NP Ruma National Park The planning team would like to thank the following staff from Western Conservation Area who contributed to the development of this plan by providing relevant planning information: Stephen Chonga, George Tokro, George Anyona, and Maurice Koduk. II Approval Page The management of the Kenya Wildlife Service has approved the implementation of this management plan for Ruma National Park III Executive Summary The Plan This 5-year (2012-2017) management plan for Ruma National Park has been developed in accordance with the standard operating procedure (SOP) for developing management plans for protected areas. The plan is one of four management planning initiatives piloting the revised standard operating procedure, the others being Kisumu Impala, Ndere and Hell’s gate National Parks. In line with this SOP, this plan aims to balance conservation and development in the target protected areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Tsavo: Small Steps, Big Impacts ©IFAW/D
    Tsavo: Small Steps, Big Impacts July 2007 - June 2008 Tsavo: Small Steps, Big Impacts Tsavo: A Front cover: Elephants ©IFAW/D. Willetts Community ©IFAW/E. Indakwa A desert rose in full bloom in Tsavo IFAW/D. Willetts IFAW/D. © IFAW/D. Willetts IFAW/D. © Great white egrets at Lake Jipe in Tsavo West IFAW/D. Willetts IFAW/D. © Tsavo: Small Steps, Big Impacts Tsavo: Eland strut the Tsavo landscape 1 IFAW/D. Willetts IFAW/D. Message from James Isiche © Investing in a Worthy Cause The third financial year for the Tsavo Conservation Area Project (TCAP) commenced on an exciting note for IFAW and Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS). Set objectives were on course; Kenya’s economy was booming; tourist numbers and park revenues were at an all-time high; and KWS seemed poised to achieve financial self- sustenance by 2013. Unfortunately, two unrelated events patrols and maintenance of fire breaks in pummeled the financial fortunes of the fire-prone sections of the park were done. Tsavo Parks and left the country’s wildlife – elephants in particular – in great peril. These huge challenges cannot, however, obscure the tremendous gains made during The decision by CITES in 2007 to allow this period. Our support for innovative four Southern African states to offload their community conservation projects aimed ivory stockpiles to Japan and China placed at reducing human-wildlife conflicts and a threat on elephants in other countries uplifting livelihoods will certainly enhance within the continent. Then, an eruption of community support for conservation. violence after Kenya’s disputed presidential Most heartening, also, is the unwavering election at the close of 2007 followed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of Kenya's Elephants
    The status of Kenya’s elephants 1990–2002 C. Thouless, J. King, P. Omondi, P. Kahumbu, I. Douglas-Hamilton The status of Kenya’s elephants 1990–2002 © 2008 Save the Elephants Save the Elephants PO Box 54667 – 00200 Nairobi, Kenya first published 2008 edited by Helen van Houten and Dali Mwagore maps by Clair Geddes Mathews and Philip Miyare layout by Support to Development Communication CONTENTS Acknowledgements iv Abbreviations iv Executive summary v Map of Kenya viii 1. Introduction 1 2. Survey techniques 4 3. Data collection for this report 7 4. Tsavo 10 5. Amboseli 17 6. Mara 22 7. Laikipia–Samburu 28 8. Meru 36 9. Mwea 41 10. Mt Kenya (including Imenti Forest) 42 11. Aberdares 47 12. Mau 51 13. Mt Elgon 52 14. Marsabit 54 15. Nasolot–South Turkana–Rimoi–Kamnarok 58 16. Shimba Hills 62 17. Kilifi District (including Arabuko-Sokoke) 67 18. Northern (Wajir, Moyale, Mandera) 70 19. Eastern (Lamu, Garissa, Tana River) 72 20. North-western (around Lokichokio) 74 Bibliography 75 Annexes 83 The status of Kenya’s elephants 1990–2002 AcKnowledgemenTs This report is the product of collaboration between Save the Elephants and Kenya Wildlife Service. We are grateful to the directors of KWS in 2002, Nehemiah Rotich and Joseph Kioko, and the deputy director of security at that time, Abdul Bashir, for their support. Many people have contributed to this report and we are extremely grateful to them for their input. In particular we would like to thank KWS field personnel, too numerous to mention by name, who facilitated our access to field records and provided vital information and insight into the status of elephants in their respective areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnicity, Governance and Socio – Economic Development in Africa: a Case Study of Kenya and Its Luo Community, 1963 – 2013
    ETHNICITY, GOVERNANCE AND SOCIO – ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA: A CASE STUDY OF KENYA AND ITS LUO COMMUNITY, 1963 – 2013 ALBERT GORDON OTIENO OMULO STUDENT NUMBER: 3523464 A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor Philosophiae in Public Policy and Administration, in the School of Government, University of the Western Cape Supervisor: Senior Professor John J. Williams November 2017 KEYWORDS Ethnicity Governance Development Africa Kenya Luo Nyanza Globalists Kenyatta Odinga ii http://etd.uwc.ac.za ABSTRACT “Ethnicity” and disparate group-based socio-economic development make governance in Africa problematic. Despite this existential reality, the “ethnic” question in African governance remains, largely, only the subject of general discourse. There appears to be very little rigorous scholarship on the economic and socio-cultural dimensions related to the socio-historical construct, “ethnicity”. Similarly, attempts to explain why African political culture, in general, continues to encourage the social reproduction of “ethnic” identities also appear to be largely lacking. This thesis aims to fill some of the gaps existent in scholarship of ethnicity vis-à-vis socio-economic- cultural development by examining the antagonism between the Luo community and the Kenyan state. Its main objectives are to examine the specifics of the socio-economic consequences of the political marginalization of the Luo and to explain why “ethnicity” is, seemingly, strongly correlated with the crisis of state power in Kenya. This thesis is grounded on the following two major assertions: first, that “ethnicity”, like its correlative, “race”, is an ideological concept, devoid of any scientific substance; second, that “ethnicity” is an “exogenous construct”, imposed on aboriginal people of Africa mostly by European colonizers.
    [Show full text]