World Bank Document

Document of The World Bank

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY FILLLC Y Public Disclosure Authorized

Report No.1896a-IN

INDIA Public Disclosure Authorized ANDHRAPRADESH FISHERIES PROJECT

STAFF APPRAISAL REPORT Public Disclosure Authorized

May 15, 1978 Public Disclosure Authorized Agriculture D Division South Asia Projects Department

This documenthas a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performanceof their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. ,CURRENCYEQUIVALENT I/

US$1.00 = Rs 8.60 Rs 1.00 = US$0.116

Rs 1,000 - US$116.279 Rs 1,000,000 US$116,279.00

WEIGHTS AND MEASURES

Metric System

ABBREVIATIONS

APFC - Andhra Pradesh Fisheries Corporation Ltd. APFD - Andhra Pradesh Fisheries Department ARDC - Agricultural Refinance and Development Corporation BCC - Backward Class (Cooperative Finance) Corporation CCC - Central Coordinating Committee (GOI) CIFT - Central Institute of Fishery Technology CMFRI - Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute CMU - Catch Monitoring Unit DS - District Subcommittee EFP - Exploratory Fisheries Project FTO - Fishery Terminal Organization COAP - Government of Andhra Pradesh OI - Government of India ICB - International Competitive Bidding KBBY - Kakinada Boat Building Yard MEU - Monitoring and Evaluation Unit MFV - Mechanized Fishing Vessel (trawler-gillnetter) PISFH - Pre-investment Survey of Fishing Harbors MPEDA - Marine Products Export Development Authority PB - Participating Bank PCC - Project Coordinating Committee SPD - State Ports Department SFDA - Small Farmers Development Agency VPT - Visakhapatnam Port Trust

1/ Until September 24, 1975, the Rupee was officially valued at fixed Pound Sterling rate. Since then it has been fixed against a "basket" of currencies. As these currencies are floating, the US Dollar/Rupee exchange rate is subject to change. Conversions in this report have been made at US$1 to Rs 8.60. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

INDIA

ANDHRAPRADESH FISHERIES PROJECT STAFF APPRAISAL REPORT

Table of Contents

Page No.

I. INTRODUCTION ...... 1

II. THE MARINE FISHERIES SECTOR ...... 1 Fisheries Sector ...... 1 Marine Fisheries ...... 2 Shrimp Fisheries ...... 3 Marine Fisheries of Andhra Pradesh ...... 4 Fisheries Administration 5 Status of the Gujarat Fisheries Project 7

III. THE PROJECT ...... 7 Objectives and Major Features. 7 Harbor Improvement ...... 8 Visakhapatnam ...... 8 Kakinada ...... 8 Nizampatnam ...... 9 Village Access Roads and Nizampatnam Water Supply 10 Credit for Fishing Vessels ...... 12 Credit for Seafood Plants ...... 12 Technical Assistance ...... 13

IV. PROJECT COSTS, FINANCING, PROCUREMENT, DISBURSEMENT, AUDITING AND ACCOUNTS ...... 14 Cost Estimates ...... 14 Financing ...... 16 Project Implementation ...... 16 Lending Terms and Conditions ...... 17 Procurement ...... 18 Disbursement ...... 19 Accounts and Audit ...... 20

V. ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT...... 20 Coordination and Implementation ...... 20 Project Cootdinating Committee ...... 20 GOI Central Coordinating Committee ...... 20 District Subcommittees ...... 21

This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. -2-

Table of Contents (cont'd)

Page No.

GOAP Department of Fisheries ...... 21 GOAP State Ports Department ...... 21 GOAP Panchayati Raj Department ...... 21 Andhra Pradesh Fisheries Corporation ...... 22 Monitoring and Evaluation ...... 22 Credit Organization ...... 23 Agricultural Refinance and Development Corporation ...... 23 Institutional Assistance to Small Fishermen ..... 23

VI. PROJ]ECTPRODUCTION, MARKETING AND PRICES ...... 23 Production ...... 23 Marketing ...... 24 Prices ...... 24

VII. FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS ...... 25 Financial Analysis ...... 25 Cost Recovery of Investment in Harbors ...... 25 Economic Analysis ...... 25 Project Beneficiaries ...... 26 Long Term Development Impact ...... 27 Risks ...... 27 Environmental Effect ...... 27

VIII. RECOMMENDATIONS ...... 27

ANNEXES

1. Andhra Pradesh Fisheries Corporation - Financial Position Summary 2. Fishing Vessels 3. Project Cost Estimates 4. Financial Analysis and Cash Flow Projections 5. Economic Analysis 6. Estimated Quarterly Schedule of Disbursements 7. Related Documents and Data in Project File -3-

CHARTS

Government of India Fisheries (18462) Project Related Ministries,Fisheries and State Ports Department (18391) Department Gf Fisheries (18390) Relation between District Administrationand Fisheries Department (18392) Andhra Pradesh Fisheries Corporation (18381) Fishing Vessels (18180-18183) Project ImplementationSchedule (18367) ImplementationSchedule - Harbor Construction(18416) Schematic Plans of Seafood Processing Plants (18229 and 18228)

MAPS

Project Districts and Areas (13248) Visakhapatnam- Proposed Harbor Improvementsand Facilities (13252) Kakinada - Proposed New Fishing Harbor (13253) Nizampatnam - Proposed New Harbor and Facilities (13254) Nizampatnam District (13250) East Godavari District (13251) Guntur District (13249)

INDIA

APPRAISAL OF

ANDHRA PRADESH FISHERIES PROJECT

I. INTRODUCTION

1.01 The Government of India (GOI) has asked for an IDA credit of US$17.5 million to help finance a fisheries project in the State of Andhra Pradesh. GOI attaches high priority to marine fisheries development and, in particular, to this project which would be the second in a series of Bank-group financed marine fisheries projects in India, and the first major fisheries development project on the east coast.

1.02 Following an FAO/IBRD Cooperative Program Mission in July/September 1975, potential marine fisheries projects were identified for Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh, Kerala, Karnataka, Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu. 1/ Appraisal of the Gujarat Fisheries Project was undertaken in May/June 1976 and the Credit/Loan became effective in July 1977. The proposed Andhra Pradesh Fisheries Project would make a major contribution to India's marine fishing industry by facili- tating exploitation of rich fishery resources, particularly shrimp, off the Andhra Pradesh coast. In addition, the project would provide a stepping stone in India's development of a deep-sea fishing fleet, and would make a major beginning in helping small subsistence fishermen in isolated fishing villages. The project was prepared by the Department of Fisheries of the Government of Andhra Pradesh (GOAP).

1.03 This report is based on the findings of an appraisal mission, com- posed of Messrs D. Lee, L. Sprague, R. Reidinger (IBRD), and B. Meeke, Y.N. Kim and C. Hamlin (Consultants) and R. Deshpande (ARDC), that visited the project area in September/October 1977. Mr. E. Ruderfer (IBRD) assisted the mission. The cyclone which devastated the coast of Andhra Pradesh in November 1977 has not affected the mission's findings, since reports indicate that it caused negligible damage to the mechanized fishing fleet and in the proposed project areas.

II. THE MARINE FISHERIES SECTOR

Fisheries Sector

2.01 Fishermen. The fishing industry in India employs about 5.5 million workers, or 1.0% of the population. About 1.0 million of them are full-time fishermen, while the rest are part-time or employed in fisheries related industries, such as marketing, net making, boat building and so forth. The vast

1/ India Fisheries Project Identification/Preparation Mission, 2 volumes, Report No. 5/76 IND-27, January 26, 1976. -2- majority of fishermen are very poor, although there has been considerable improvement in their standard of living in recent years, especially for those engaged in the export shrimp industry. They are generally hard working and skillful, and come from all the major religious groups in India. Notably, many fishing communities come under the purview of Government programs designed to assist people belonging to the scheduled classes and as such have special protections and privileges under the law. The fishing industry in India is commonly classified into inland fisheries and marine fisheries, with the latter further subdivided into traditional and commercial fisheries. Total production of fish for 1976 was 2.2 million tons of which about 0.8 million tDns was from inland fish production and 1.4 million tons was marine catch.

Marine Fisheries

2.02 India lies between about 80 and 370 N latitude and between about 613 and 972 E Longtitude and has about 5,650 km of coastline and about 415,000 km of continental shelf (to the 200 m depth contour). About 32% of the shelf is oni the east coast. The oceanographic climate of India's adjacent seas is tropical and is dominated by two monsoon seasons, the southwest monsoon fr-omMay to September and the northeast monsoon from November to March.

2.03 The total marine fish catch rose from 580,000 tons in 1950 to 1.4 miLllion tons in 1976. During this same period, the fleet of mechanized fishing vessels (MFVs) rose from 23 to about 12,000. The main factor contributing to this rapid motorization of the fishing fleet was the attractive world shrimp market coupled with abundant shrimp resources along the coasts of India. Much of the catch of bottom fish species harvested by trawlers is incidental to the shrimp catch which is the primary purpose of the operations.

2.04 TradiLtional non-mechanized vessels (Non-MFVs) operating from 1,800 fishing villages along the coastline of India have an operational range of about 8 km from the shore. MFVs concentrated around fishing harbours, river mouths and creeks operate up to about 20 km from their bases and in depths of up to about 40 m. Despite rapid mechanization during the last two decades, over 70% of the marine catch is still from traditional non-mechanized boats, mcst of them catamarans which are made up of two or more solid, light, shaped timbers lashed together.

2.05 Marine fisheries developed earlier on the west coast due to a wider ccntinental shelf, more numerous fishing harbor sites and more easily exploit- able shrimp resources which have provided the impetus for commercial coastal fisheries development. As a result of these natural advantages, the west coast has long had a well established export base for marine fisheries. During the last ten years, however, the marine fish catch has grown more rapidly on the east coast, increasing by about 150% compared to only about 50% on the west coast.

2.06 The market for export products is sharply distinct from the local market. Export demand for shrimp is good, prices are high with favorable prospects for the future. Two great urban markets dominate the internal markets for fish in India; Bombay for marine fish and Calcutta for inland fish. -3-

Bombay prices are determined daily and communicated to fish production centers by a vast network of private traders. A wide variety of marine fish, including crustaceans not suitable for export, are marketed for human consumption. Because large quantities of fish are landed on the beaches by non-mechanized fishermen, great variations in quantities, species, quality and prices are commonplace. The sale of these products is carried out by private traders by auction, mostly in small lots under generally poor sanitary conditions. Public acceptance of marine fish as food is growing, but it is far less than in other Asian countries. Frozen fish is virtually unknown to the average local consumer but the use of ice to transport high value species of fish and to keep them in reasonable condition at point of sale is increasing rapidly. Non-mechanized boats do not carry ice but many use coarse salt. Curing by salting and drying is the most common method employed for processing of the marine fish catch for human consumption.

2.07 While India's per capita availability of fish has been increasing, the consumer price index for fish has been rising about the same as those for food articles and consumer goods in general. It is expected that this trend will continue. Marketing margins for fish in Andhra Pradesh are very high for all fish species. The average fisherman's share of the retail price of fish species in 1976 was only about 16% for high quality fish, and 17% for medium and low quality fish.

Shrimp Fisheries

2.08 In the marine fisheries of India, crustaceans comprising of high quality shrimp, lobsters and crabs are by far the most important in terms of the value of catch. Although they form only about 12% of the landed live weight of the marine catch, their value exceeds 60% of the total. India's present position as first among the shrimp fishing nations of the world is the result of the mechanization of the fishing fleet and a rapid rate of infrastructure development since the 1950's. Taking advantage of the buoyant market for shrimp in Japan, United States and Europe, India has made impres- sive progress in introducing MFVs, and investing in fish freezing and marketing facilities. With a world shrimp market share of about 20%, India has become the world's largest shrimp producer. With the commencement of the export trade of frozen shrimp to the USA, a rapid transformation took place in fisheries, and established fisheries such as sardines and mackerel became less important. At present (1976) India exports about 48,000 tons of finished crustacean products valued at about US$214 million per year. The catch of crustaceans and their export have been increasing each year. Five ports in India handle virtually all the export of frozen shrimp. Cochin and Bombay are the most important, but Visakhapatnam is expected to handle an increasing share of shrimp exports as larger trawlers begin to land their catches there and as the port's volume becomes great enough to attract more frequent visits of vessels with facilities for frozen cargo.

2.09 Shrimp is one of the most important of the high-valued marine products entering world trade channels. Demand for shrimp products on the world market is strong and rising each year, especially in Japan, the United States and Western Europe. This demand will largely have to be filled by expanding - 4 - imports, primarily from Asia. India became the leading producer in 1973 fol- lowed by the United States, Thailand, Mexico, Malysia, Japan, South Vietnam and Taiwan. India's landings of shrimp increased by 169,000 tons (or about 220%) between L965 and 1975, when they accounted for about 20% of the total world output oE shrimp and prawns. Annual shrimp production from the other major producing countries has either stabilized or slowed in growth in recent years, and the market for Indian shrimp appears to be highly favorable. During the ten years ending 1974, wholesale shrimp prices increased at an average of 15% per year; the rate of increase was much sharper in the period following 1970 than earlier. For the future, it appears reasonably certain that shrimp prices will rise faster than foreseeable increases in Indian production cosits.

2.10 The quality of shrimp caught in the coastal waters of India is superior and some of the Indian frozen shrimp are among the most sought after by the highly discriminatng Japanese market. The way in which the shrimp are handled in processing stages, however, leaves much scope for improvement.

Marine Fisheries of Andhra Pradesh

2.11 Andhra Pradesh has an extensive coastline2of about 870 km and a shelf area (up to depths of 50 m) of about 9,000 km . Although the east coast of India has, relative to the west coast, a narrower continental shelf (averag- ing about 40 km wide), much of it is good ground for trawling. In the late 1950s the Exploratory Fisheries Project (EFP) of GOI headquartered in Bombay launched systematic test fishing on the east coast to assess the commercially trawlable resources. An EFP base was established at Visakhapatnam in 1959 and additional bases at Calcutta (1971) and Paradeep (1973). From 1959 to 1976, EFP test fishing vessels conducted 39,000 hours of trawling in the general area of east cost, with 13,500 hours of this in the project area (upper east coast) in depths of 10 to 80 meters. The EFP data show that there are adequate fisheries resources in the general area and indicate three major species in the catch composition, i.e. shrimp, catfish and shark, together accounting for 45 to 60%. The remainder consists of a myriad of miscellaneous fish. The rapid pace of (ievelopment on the east coast indicates that continuing studies aiLmedat monitoring changes in biological parameters should be carried out to giLveearly warning of possible over-exploitation, particularly in depth ranges up to 50 meters.

2.12 Fishing Harbors. Inadequacy of fishing harbors is now the most critical constraint hindering the development of marine fisheries. There are only two fishing harbors in Andhra Pradesh suitable for use by MFVs, Visakha- patnam and Kakinada. Visakhapatnam is India's fifth largest commercial port and has the only deepwater facilities along the 1,250 km of the east coast between Paradeep (Orissa) to the north and Madras (Tamil Nadu) to the south and functions as both commercial port and fishing harbor. It is served by the main coastal highway and railway routes. The fishing harbor began by using urnder-utilized parts of the commercial harbor. Subsequently, plans were drawn ur)to construct:a fishing harbor in two stages. The first stage is well - 5 - underway and is expected to be completed early in 1978; a fleet of 150 9m and 10m MFVs are already using the harbor in its partially completed form. Larger trawlers and some MFVs still operate from temporary berths in the inner commercial harbor. At present, the facilities for handling the catch are chaotic and high losses in the quality of fish products occur. Kakinada is the State's other main fishing harbor and lies about 150 km southeast of Visakhapatnam. The existing harbor consists of commercial and fishing harbor facilities. Kakinada has a fleet of about 600 registered MFVs of which about 300 currently operate from the port. The Kakinada fleet lands an estimated 11,000 tons yearly, including about 1,300 tons of shrimp. The fishing port basin could adequately service perhaps 75 small MFVs, but it is far too small for the present fleet which exceeds 500 vessels during peak season resulting in extreme crowding. The channel leading to the port is heavily congested and hazardous for both fishing and commercial port operations. The present harbor improvement program for Kakinada appears to be totally inadequate for the existing needs and offers little practical scope for expansion in the future.

2.13 Other Constraints to Development. Inadequacy of credit for purchase of fishing vessels is also a serious constraint to commercial fisheries development. For efficient exploitation of the valuable shrimp resourves, many new MFVs need to be deployed - lOm MFVs to operate on a day-return basis out of the two fishing harbors, 9m MFVs and 12m Non-MFVs to operate from the Nizampatnam harbor where the entrance is shallow, and 23m shrimp trawlers to fish in the more distant waters hitherto virtually unexploited. Investments in shrimp processing facilities are also needed to handle the incremental catch. Moreover, lack of fishing village access roads has been seriously hampering improvement of the productivity and livelihood of large numbers of subsistence fishermen.

Fisheries Administration

2.14 Under the Indian Constitution, both the Union Government and States share responsibilities for the administration and development of fisheries. Each of the States is directly responsible for the administration and development of fisheries within the territorial waters of the sea and of the inland waters. The Union Government is responsible for the administration and development of fisheries beyond the territorial waters and for fisheries research, although research is carried out by the State governments as well. Fisheries administration in each of the States is generally the responsibility of a Department of Fisheries.

2.15 Government of India. The Department of Agriculture, under the Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation, has overall responsibility for the formulation of national policies and programs for fisheries and fishing harbor development, processing and preservation of fish, fisheries education and training, fish trade, etc. It assists State Governments in formulating policy, plans and projects, and setting up fisheries corporations, and offers technical advice and guidance when required. It has jurisdiction over the following major institutions: (i) Exploratory Fisheries Project (EFP); (ii) Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI); (iii) Central Institute of Fishery Technology (CIFC); and, (iv) UNDP/FAO Pelagic Fisheries - 6 -

Project. The geographic center of fisheries research is Cochin, where headquarters of al:Lbut EFP are located. The Marine Products Export Development Authority (MPE])A), also located in Cochin, under the Ministry of Commerce, pl]ays a vital role in the development of marine products for export, mainly shrimp.

2.16 Government of Andhra Pradesh. The Department of Fisheries of Andhra Pradesh (APFD) is under the administrative control of the Secretary to the Government for the Forests and Rural Development Department. APFD is headed by a Director of Fisheries who reports directly to the Secretary, Forests and Rural Development (Charts 18390 and 18391). APFD headquarters is in Hyderabad, the capital of Andhra Pradesh. It is responsible for fisheries administration and fisheries cooperative societies, provides assistance to village development officers by means of the village panchayati raj 1/ system (Chart 18392), operates demonstration projects in fish farming, provides inland fisheries extension and a variety of other fisheries services. With a staff of 50 pro- fessional fisheries officials, APFD is well administered and staffed by able people. Except for the GOI operated port at Visakhapatnam, all fishing harbors in Andhra Pradesh are operated and maintained by the State Ports Department.

2 17 Andhra Pradesh Fisheries Corporation. The Andhra Pradesh Fisheries Corporation (A]?FC) was established in 1974 to encourage commercial fisheries development in the State, particularly for marine fisheries. Only six private companies have freezing and frozen storage capacity, and several of these, accounting for most of the capacity, are vertically integrated and process primarily their own catch. APFC thus provides a needed ready market for smaller fishermen and small vessel operators. APFC's registered headquarters are in Kakinada, where most of its major business transactions occur, while the Managing Director in Visakhapatnam oversees company operations and day-to- day procurement and marketing. At present, APFC's major interests and activities include boat building, shrimp freezing and processing plants, ice and cold storage plants, a 21-vessel fishing fleet, fuel and lubricants depots, fishing gear and net making unit, canning plant, internal fish marketing, and shrimp exporting. The APFC-owned Kakinada Boat Building Yard (KBBY) is easily the largest boat builder in Andhra Pradesh, and has produced most of the State's existing MFV fleet. APFC currently has a total of over 500 employees, with the largest units being boat building yard and the Visakhapatnam ice and freezing plant, which together account for about 70% of APFC employment. The quality of present management personnel is high, and in 1976/77 APFC made a profit of Rs 110,000 compared to substantial losses in the previous two years (Aknnex 1).

2.18 Government Programs to Assist Small Fishermen. The GOI-sponsored Small Farmers ])evelopment Agency (SFDA) has programs to assist both small commercial fishermen and subsistence village fishermen. In cooperation with commercial banks, SFDA provides loans to small fishermen for part of the down- payment required to purchase MFVs, and also provides a subsidy to assist village subsistence fishermen in obtaining bank loans for gear and country fishing boats. The GOAP Backward Class Cooperative Finance Corporation (BCC)

1l/ Literally, village council rule or government; in practice, it refers to the community or rural development program in Andhra Pradesh. -7- provides down-payment loans at subsidized interest rates to enable small fishermen to obtain loans to purchase gear and vessels including MFVs, while the GOAP Industries Department provides similar assistance to educated but unemployed individuals.

Status of the Gujarat Fisheries Project

2.19 The Gujarat Fisheries Project (Cr. 695-IN, Ln. 1394-IN), the first Bank-group financed marine fisheries project for India, became effective on July 19, 1977. This Loan/Credit provides US$18.0 million for marine fisheries development to be implemented by the Government of Gujarat and includes finance for (i) improvement of the State's two leading fishing harbors (Mangrol and Veraval) and provision of basic infrastructure for 8 fishing villages, (ii) credit through participating banks with ARDC refinancing to fishermen, cooperatives and private entrepreneurs for outboard motors, mechanized canoes, MFVs, ice and cold storage plants, processing facilities and net making equipment, and (iii) technical assistance for test fishing operations off the coasts of Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh, fish marketing studies and consultants for project implementation. Progress in project implementation was slow but is accelerat- ing. Draft tender documents for the Veraval Harbor were reviewed and found to be adequate and tenders have been invited.

III. THE PROJECT

Objectives and Major Features

3.01 The main objectives of the project would be: (i) to increase marine fisheries production in Andhra Pradesh by improving three important fishing harbors in the State and providing credit for acquisition of fishing vessels, both mechanized and non-mechanized, to be owned and operated by private individuals, companies, and cooperatives, and for seafood plants for the state-owned Andhra Pradesh Fisheries Corporation (APFC) and (ii) to improve productivity of small fishermen by constructing access roads to a large number of fishing villages scattered along the coast of the three marine fisheries districts.

3.02 Major features of the project would be: (i) improvement of three harbors, Visakhapatnam, Kakinada and Nizampatnam (shown in Map 13248); (ii) construction of a coastal fishing village access roads in Visakhapatnam, East Godavari and Guntur Districts where the project harbors are located; (iii) credit for 360 MFVs and 60 non-MFVs; (iv) credit for seafood processing facilities at two harbors; and (v) technical assistance providing a specialist in esturarial river training works and a naval architect as consultants, a program of overseas study tours, and construction of two experimental 23m wooden hull shrimp trawlers. -8-

Harbor Improvement 1/

3.03 Visakhapatnam. The project investments would be designed to remedy the iaadequacy of the harbor in servicing the present and future fishing fleet. The present fishing harbor was built in conjunction with expansion of the breakwaters for the large commercial port at Visakahapatnam, and lies just outside the entrance to the main harbor in the lee of the new breakwater. The tidal range at spring and neap tides is 1.40 m and 0.55 m, respectively. The harbor was originally designed to be constructed in two stages, with Stage I to handle 150 10m MFVs and 15 23m trawlers, and Stage II to handle 250 10m MFVs and 30 trawlers. Construction began on Stage I in early 1976, and includes a 510 m long marginal quay, slipway and repair facilities, buildings and services, and land reclamation. Stage I is generally complete except for work on the slipway, and final completion is expected in 1978. Stage I was expected to be sufficient for ten years, but a fleet of some 150 lm MFVs is already using the fishing harbor as a base, while 50 lm MFVs and 22 larger shrimp trawlers are operating from the Visakhapatnam inner commercial harbor. The GOAP Fisheries Department anticipates a fleet of about 56 Large shrimp trawlers and 300 MFVs by late 1979. Layout and facilities existing and to be financed under the project would be sufficient to serve a fleet of about 300 m MFVs and 56 trawlers, and would be well suited to expansion if justified by future fleet growth. Most of the engineering data collection and studies needed for the fishing harbor were done earlier in connection with the expansion of the commercial harbor. Facilities to be provided would include additional quay length and four berthing jetties totalling 1115 m length; expanded slipway facilities to be operated by VPT with repair jetty and crawler crane; buildings including auction hall expansion, fishermen's gear sheds, and toilet blocks; completion of roads, drains and culverts; additional electrical and water distribution systems; land acquisition (not financed by IDA); and dredging of slipway and repair berth area (Map 13252).

3.04 Kakinada. The project investments would be designed to relocate and expand the harbor capacity. The present Kakinada fishing harbor is about 6 km from the sea on the commercial canal which extends to the center of Kakinada city. The entrance to the commercial canal is sheltered by a large natural breakwater known as Godavari point which almost encircles Kakinada Bay. The tidal range in the area is 1.34 m at mean spring tide, and the mean low water spring tide level is 0.2 m above chart datum. The present fishing harbor is located on the south side of the commercial canal in a densely developed area close to the center of the city. The harbor basin is 180 m long but only 22 m wide, and can adequately accommodate about 75 1lm MFVs at the most. The number of 10m MFVs registered at Kakinada in 1977 totalled 610, compared to abouat50 in 1968, and is expected to grow by about 150 MFVs per year; it is estimated that pierhaps300 10m MFVs now operate from this port regularly. These large numbers result in heavy congestion of fishing port facilities, as well as extreme hazards in the commercial canal. Under the project, the Kakinada Fishing Harbor would be relocated behind a breakwater and spur to be built about 2 km north of the present canal entrance, and about 8 km from the present fishing harbor. This harbor and breakwater would reduce congestion in

17 For further details see project file (India, Andhra Pradesh Fisheries Project, Appraisal Mission - Mission Consultant's Report on Harbors). -9-

the commercial canal, provide adequate accommodation for the existing and anticipated fleet of 10m MFVs as well as accommodation for some large trawlers, reduce vessel steaming time to reach fishing grounds and provide protection for commercial barges. The facility would be easily expandable if needed as fleet size grows. The harbor would be planned to accommodate abou._ 410 lOm MFVs and 15 large shrimp trawlers. Basic engineering data to determine the technical feasibility of the breakwater facilities have been developed for earlier, similar proposals, but further studies for the project as now proposed is necessary to determine the optimum length of the breakwater spur, soil conditions at the breakwater and jetty sites more precisely, optimum size and quantity of breakwater armour, and filter layer requirements. The facilities would include a breakwater, about 880 m long, plus a 200 m right angle spur at the end of the breakwater; MFV landing jetty 150 m long; MFV outfitting and berthing jetty 150 m long; 2 MFV berthing jetties each 185 m long; shrimp trawler landing, fitting, outfitting and berthing jetty with dredged depth to 4.0 m minimum; two auction halls on the jetties; basin and approach channel dredging to 4.0 m minimum water depth for the 23 m trawler facilities; boat repair facility; buildings including administration building, toilet block, and canteen; roads and drainage; and services including power and light, water and fuel points (Map 13253).

3.05 Nizampatnam. The project investments would be designed to upgrade the harbor facilities. South of Kakinada, no fishing harbors with full facilities for regular use by MFVs exist. To intensify mechanized fishing activities in this area, the project would include harbor development at Nizampatnam. Currently no road connections or facilities for fish landing, handling or transport exist at the harbor site which would be situated on a large irrigation drainage canal about 1 km from the canal mouth and about 6 km from Nizampatnam village. Harbor design and siting are based on FAO-assisted engineering surveys and studies which are adequate to indicate the technical feasibility of the facilities proposed. The estimated tidal range is 1.36 m for Mean High Water Spring Tides and 0.30 m for mean low water spring tides. The harbor entrance (canal mouth) would be partly protected log piling training walls, which are currently under construction by the Department of Trans- port, Buildings and Roads. The Irrigation Department controls the flow of canal water and has participated in the early stages of training wall development to improve drainage and decrease canal siltation. At present the harbor is used by about 115 sailing vessels which stay out for four or five days at a time. When weather conditions are good, about 25 9m MFVs use the harbor and berth there at night. Under the project, facilities would be provided to serve an additional 60 9m MFVs and 60 12m non-MFVs. Facilities to be provided would include a harbor basin 215 m long and 30 m wide dredged to about 2.0 m minimum water depth; revetments; a landing, outfitting and berthing quay of 190 m length; a boat ramp; an auction hall; 1.2 ha of harbor working area; an administration building and toilet block; a harbor approach road of 3 km length; fuel and marine facilities including a workboat and lighthouse, transit lights, and a maintenance workshop with equipment; drainage; and services including water supply, electricity, and lighting. Early provision of the 3 km harbor approach road across a mangrove swamp would be a key component of the project, as would be the basic services such as water and electricity and adequate living quarters for relevant port and fisheries staff at the harbor or in Nizampatnam village, as required for close supervision of - 10 - the project. Improvement of the harbor entrance through construction of training walls, which is currently under way, is not included in the project. Depth at the harbor entrance is currently sufficient for general use by Non-MFVs, but can generally be used only during high tide by 9m MFVs which have a draft of about 1.0 m. Completion of the training walls is expected to stabilize the alignment of the entrance channel, and may also increase its depth, although probably only marginally. The harbor has therefore been designed assuming the minimum entrance channel depth remains at about the 1.0 meter level prevailing naturally. Based on available tidal and survey data, project 9m MFVs may not be able to use the entrance during low tide, or under adverse weather conditions with waves of one meter or more during the period from February to May when the lowest tides occur. However, about 25 9m MFVs are already successfully operating at Nizampatnam under an APFD pilot scheme started in 1976, and a somewhat larger fleet of 9m MFVs has reportedly been successfully using the slightly shallower harbor entrance at Machilipatnam about 70 km to the north. Especially since no other more favorable sites exist in the area, the harbor investment is considered justified. At negotiations, assurances would be sought that GOAP would include the harbor entrance at Nizampatnam within the seaward limits of the port under the jurisdiction of SPD, and make their best efforts to ensure that dredging of the entrance channel would be undertaken if needed to maintain a minimum water depth in the entrance of at least 1.0 meter (Map 13254).

Village Access Roads and Nizampatnam Water Supply

3.06 Village Roads. The project would provide for improvement and construction of about 215 km of village access roads, nearly 75% of which would be new. The roads would be located in the districts of Visakhapatnam, East Godavari and Guntur where the project harbors of Visakhapatnam, Kakinada and Nizampatnam are located, and would serve a total of about 100 coastal fishing villages and landing centers benefitting directly about 75,000 people of coastal fishing families. Details of the proposed roads are given in Annex 3, Table 6.

3.07 Lack of access roads has been the overriding factor hampering improve- inent of the productivity and livelihood of subsistence fishermen. Because of poor communications, the marketing of catch has been possible only on an ex- tremely haphazard basis. Many fishing villages are accessible only on foot and transport of catch is often by head basket which is slow and costly. As a result, relatively low prices are paid to village fishermen and very often :hey are at the mercy of the merchant--money lenders who are both their only source of finance and the only market outlet. Similarly, supporting services such as extension, banking and cooperatives cannot physically be extended to many of the fishing villages, and existing programs serving traditional fisher- rmen under the Fisheries Department, the Small Farmer Development Agency and t:he Andhra Pradesh, Backward Class Corporation, for example, are at present relatively ineffective in reaching fishermen in isolated villages. Avail- ability of social services such as education and medical assistance is simi- ].arly constraiined and thus very limited.

3.08 Under these circumstances, an essential prerequisite and perhaps the most important: thing that can be done at this stage to help these small fisher- - 11.- men would be to provide access roads necessary for improving the marketing of catch and making the provision of extension, credit, cooperatives and other services more effective. Road construction and improvement would include adequate design, base-formation, metalling, and black topping. Width of the roads would be about 4.5 m of blacktop on a 7.5 m width over the shoulders. The work would be executed by local contractors selected through local competitive bidding, and administered by the Panchayeti Raj Department through its local district executive engineers. Maintenance of rural roads is generally adequate at present, and maintenance of access roads for the project would be the responsibility of the District Collector's Office. (Maps 13250, 13251, and 13249).

3.09 Water Supply at Nizampatnam Village. The project would also finance a water supply system at Nizampatnam which has a population of about 15,000. Obtaining adequate supplies of potable water is currently very difficult in the village and is essential for the Nizampatnam harbor development. Under the project, two existing water tanks in the village would be deepened and renovated, and a new overhead tank constructed. Pumping equipment and piping to bring water from a nearby irrigation canal would be installed, along with a water distribution system for the village. Execution of works would be on the same basis as the village access roads.

Credit for Fishing Vessels

3.10 The project would provide credit through participating banks (PBs), whose loans would be refinanced by the Agricultural Refinance and Development Corporation (ARDC), and go to eligible individuals, cooperatives and companies for purchase of project fishing vessels. Fishing vessels financed under the project would comprise 300 10m MFVs, 60 9m MFVs and 60 12m sailing craft called Kathapalem Navas (Non-MFVs). Some of the MFVs and Non-MFVs would be cooperatively owned. Most of the existing fleet is owned individually, and the pro- portion of vessels which would be financed cooperatively under the project is uncertain but assumed to be about half. Since it is by far the State's largest boat builder with proven capabilities to produce project MFVs, the APFC Kakinada Boat Building Yard (KBBY) would probably build most of the project MFVs, although independent boat builders could build project MFVs using KBBY designs. All vessels would be equipped with navigation instruments, life- saving devices such as life vests and ring bouys and suitable fire extin- guishers, and would have radio equipment for monitoring weather forecasts. Safety measures would be particularly important at Nizampatnam, where the shallow harbor entrance may be hazardous under adverse weather conditions.

3.11 10m MFVs. A total of 300 10m MFVs -- 150 at Visakhapatnam and 150 at Kakinada -- would be financed for purchase by individuals, private companies and cooperative groups. These would be equipped with an air or water-cooled marine diesel engine of about 60 hp. Equipped for shrimp trawling and gill- netting, and carrying a crew of five and ice for cooling, the vessels would be intended primarily for one-day fishing trips with a range to fishing grounds of about 50 kilometers. Most project 10m MFVs probably would be built by KBBY which does good work. - 12 -

3.12 9m MFVs. For deployment at Nizampatnam, 60 9m MFVs (Pablo boats) would be financed for purchase by individuals, private companies or cooperative groups. With a draft of only about 1.0 m, these are the only local, currently available proven design of MFV capable of regular use of the shallow Nizampatnam harbor entrance, yet large enough for trawling at sea during most of the year. These vessels would have an air or water cooled marine diesel engine of about 50 horsepower, and would be equipped for shrimp trawling and gill netting, with a range to fishing grounds of about 40 kilometers. Carry- ing a crew of about five, they would be intended primarily for one-day fishing trips. The vessels would cost about Rs 108,500 each be built of teakwood by local boat builders or KBBY (Figure 18181).

3.13 12m Non-MFVs. An additional 60 non-mechanized 12m sailing craft (Kothapalam Navas) for deployment at the Nizampatnam harbor would be financed for purchase by individuals or cooperative groups. Costing about Rs 36,000 each and built entirely of teakwood by local artisans, they would be equipped for gill netting. Owned privately or by cooperatives, they would have a crew of four or five with a fishhold of about five tons capacity and be able to stay out for four or five days each trip using salt for fish preservation. With their shallow draft of only about 0.6 m, they are well suited for regular use of the Nizampatnam harbor entrance (Figure 18183).

23m Shrimp Trawlers

3.14 Although 23m shrimp trawlers are not financed under the project, facilities would be included for 30 additional trawlers at Visakhapatnam and 15 trawlers at Kakinada. These trawlers would be generally owned by individual entrepreneurs, private companies and fairly large corporations. They are financed both privately and through existing GOI programs, including the Shipping Development Fund, which helps arrange trawler financing on conces- sionary terms and provides an interest subsidy. GOI has indicated that bud- get provisions for trawler financing have been made, and that when required the necessary funds will be made available and arrangements will be made for financing and importing shrimp trawlers that would use project facilities. The trawlers have steel hulls and are fully equipped with a 380 to 500 horsepower marine diesel engine and fishing gear, and cost an estimated Rs 4.5 million each. Carrying a crew of fifteen and equipped primarily for trawling, they are capable of staying out for several weeks at a time, with onboard freezing equipment. Since no Indian boatyards build this type of vessel on a regular basis at present, most such trawlers have been imported from exper- ienced, reputable boat yards producing vessels of proven design (Figure 13182).

Credit for Seafood Plants

3.15 At tlne new Visakhapatnam and Nizampatnam fishing harbors seafood processing plants to be owned and operated by APFC would be constructed under the project, with capacities indicated below: - 13 -

Equipment Visakhapatnam Plant Nizampatnam Plant

Ice making 80 tons/day 25 tons/day Ice storage 100 tons/day 25 tons Freezing 23 tons/day 1.5 tons/day Cold storage 100 tons 25 tons Frozen storage 600 tons 20 tons Insulated trucks 3 tons 1

No seafood processing capacity for Kakinada is planned under this project. Existing capacities there are expected to be adequate to accommodate present landings and future increment, and APFC opened a new 4 ton/day freezing plant at Kakinada in July 1977.

3.16 The processing plants capacity would be adequate to supply enough ice to meet estimated full development needs for fishing vessels operating from the project harbors; the processing and overnight storage of shrimp; and packing fish for transport to internal markets. Liberal use of ice would be essential to minimize the quality deterioration of fresh fish and shrimp.

3.17 At Visakhapatnam, existing seafood processing facilities are capable of handling present fish landings. The project seafood processing plant would be designed to process mainly future fish and shrimp landings made by the 150 lOm MFVs to be deployed under the project and the 30 23m trawlers for which harbor facilities are provided, which are expected to account for the bulk of fleet growth during the project period. At full development, the project- financed Visakhapatnam plant would handle an estimated total of 5,000 tons of shrimp annually -- 4,000 tons from 150 project vessels and 30 trawlers, and 1,000 tons from fishing villages nearby. The plant would have a 600 ton storage capacity and would store for export the products from the APFC plants in Visakhapatnam, Kakinada and Nizampatnam, and would also have a shrimp grader for uniform grading of shrimp which is required by foreign markets. The frozen shrimp landings of the 23m trawlers at Visakhapatnam and Kakinada would be stored temporarily directly after landing and later be processed during the lean period for the plant, which would help alleviate the problem of fluctuat- ing raw material supplies for processing plants (Chart 18229).

3.18 At Nizampatnam, there is currently no seafood processing facility, and the project-financed plant would process shrimp landings from both the existing 25 9m MFVs and the 60 9m MFVs to be financed under the project. The Nizampatnam plant would handle an estimated total of 340 tons of shrimp per year for processing. Frozen storage capacity of the Nizampatnam plant would be relatively small since it is assumed that the frozen products would be rapidly transported to Visakhapatnam for export or storage (Chart 18228).

3.19 Plant, machinery and equipment used in the seafood plants would be conventional and of a type produced in India and used in existing plants. The only equipment not manufactured domestically is the shrimp grader for Visakhapatnam. In designing, selecting and installing equipment and insulation, special attention would be paid to the need for maintenance of tempe- ratures and hygienic standards required for seafood to meet export markets standards. Construction and operation of the plants would be the responsibility of APFC, which would own them. - 14 -

Technical Assistance

3.20 Technical assistance would include an esturial river training specialist for 3 man-months, a naval architect for 6 man-months, overseas study- tolars of about 60 days each for 10 people involved in project management, and construction of two experimental 23 m wooden hull trawlers. The main purpose of the specialist would be to assist in further study, design and construction of the training walls at the Nizampatnam harbor entrance. The naval architect would assist KBBY with the design and development of the two wooden hull trawlers. The overseas study tours would be particularly to help APFC management and fisheries officials learn more about modern shrimp quality control and marketing. The construction of the two wooden hull 23m trawlers would be undertaken experimentally by KBBY. It is estimated that their costs may be about 30% less than steel hull vessels of a similar size which currently are being imported, and development of indigenous wooden hull trawler construction capability could result in significant savings in investment costs and foreign exchange. Terms of reference and selection of the specialist and the naval architect would require IDA approval, as would selection of individuals chosen for overseas study tours.

IV. PROJECT COSTS, FINANCING, DISBURSEMENT, AUDITS AND ACCOUNTS

Cost Estimates

4.01 Total project cost, including duties and taxes, is estimated at Rs 313.6 million (US$36.5 million). Detailed cost estimates, including duties and taxes estimated at Rs 10.1 million (US$1.2 million), are given in Annex 3 and summarized below: - 15 -

Rs million US$ million % of Local Foreign Total Local Foreign Total Total Harbor Development Visakhapatnam 56.2 - 56.2 6.5 - 6.5 18 Kakinada 53.0 - 53.0 6.2 - 6.2 17 Nizampatnam 7.0 - 6.9 0.8 - 0.8 2 Sub-total 116.2 - 116.2 13.5 - 13.5 37 Village Roads and Water Supply Visakhapatnam District 12.3 - 12.3 1.4 - 1.4 4 East Godavari District 9.0 - 9.0 1.0 - 1.0 3 Guntur District 9.3 - 9.3 1.1 - 1.1 3 Nizampatnam Water Supply 0.5 - 0.5 0.1 - 0.1 - /a Sub-total 31.1 - 31.1 3.6 - 3.6 10 Fishing Vessels 10m MFVs (300) 50.7 - 50.7 5.9 - 5.9 16 9m MFVs (60) 6.5 - 6.5 0.8 - 0.8 2 12m Non-MFVs (60) 2.2 - 2.2 0.3 - 0.3 1 /a Sub-total 59.4 59.4 6.9 - 6.9 19 Seafood Processing Facilities Visakhapatnam 8.2 - 8.2 1.0 - 1.0 3 Nizampatnam 1.7 - /a 1.7 0.2 - /a 0.2 - /a Sub-total 9.8 - /a 9.8 1.1 - /a 1.2 3 Technical Assistance River Training Specialist (3 m/mo)/b 0.2 - 0.2 - /a - - /a - /a Naval Architect (6 mlmo)/b - 0.5 0.5 - 0.1 0.1 - Ta Overseas Study Tour (10) - 0.9 0.9 - 0.1 0.1 - 7 Wooden Hull Trawlers (2) 10.2 - 10.0 1.2 - 1.2 3 Sub-total 10.2 1.4 11.6 1.2 0.2 1.4 4 Base Cost Estimate 226.7 1.4 228.1 26.4 0.2 26.5 73 Physical Contingencies /c 18.9 - 18.9 2.2 - 2.2 6 (7.7%) Expected Price Increase 66.6 - 66.6 7.7 - 7.7 21 Total Expected Cost Project 312.2 1.4 313.6 36.3 0.2 36.5 100

/a Less than 0.5. /b US$8,025 per month for the river training specialist, and US$9,690 for the naval architect. The latter is higher because the naval architect would visit the project area intermittently. Ic 15% for harbor works, 10% for fishing village feeder roads, and 5% for Nizampatnam water supply works.

4.02 The estimates are based on September 1977 prices. Physical contin- gency rates appropriate to the civil works components (15% for harbor works, 10% for village access roads, and 5% for Nizampatnam water supply works) have been applied. Annual expected price increase rates used in estimating - 16 -

total costs were 8% for civil works, 7% for local equipment during the project period, and 7.5% in 1978 and 1979 and 7% thereafter for foreign equipment. Expected price increases total about 21% of estimated base cost with physical contingencies.

Financing

4.03 Estimated shares in the financing of project costs are as follows:

Borrowers /a PBs ARDC GOI/GOAP Total IDA ------Rs million------

Fishing Harbors - - - 167.0 167.0 84.2 Village Roads - - - 42.3 42.3 21.3 Fishing Vessels Cooperative /a 8.0 6.4 11.6 14.1 40.2 14.1 Private 6.0 6.8 12.3 15.0 40.2 15.0 APFC Seafood Plants 2.5 2.0 3.5 4.3 12.3 4.3 Technical Assistance - - - 11.6 11.6 11.6

Total 16.5 15.2 27.4 254.3 313.6 150.5

(5.3%) (4.9%) (8.7%) (81.1%) (100.0%) (48.0%)

/a Cooperative group borrowers' contribution includes GOAP loans, intended to help small fishermen meet the requirements of PBs for borrower contributions, equivalent to 15% of the investment cost with terms and conditions similar to those for PB loans.

4.04 The proposed IDA credit of US$17.5 million would finance about 50% of the estimated total project cost net of duties and taxes. The credit would ,-over the estimated direct foreign exchange costs of US$163,000 and about 50% of local costs.

4.05 It is proposed that at Kakinada the project would include up to IJS$0.5million of retroactive financing for eligible expenditures incurred after February 28, 1978 on civil works and engineering. Congestion in the existing harbor is acute and hazardous, and the harbor improvement program should not be delayed.

]?roject Implementation

4.06 The project would be implemented over a period of five years from ]L978through 1983, as shown in Chart 18367. Visakhapatnam and Nizampatnam harbors, village access roads and the seafood processing facilities would be completed by or during 1982, while Kakinada harbor would become operational by 1982. Deployment of project vessels would be spread over the full five year project period. Technical assistance provided by the naval architect intermittently before and during construction of the wooden hull trawlers, which would - 17 -

be completed by 1982. The study tour would be completed in 1979. The river training specialist would begin work in 1979 and provide periodic consulta- tions in 1980 and 1981 while Nizampatnam harbor is under construction.

Lending Terms and Conditions

4.07 Subvention. IDA funds for harbor works (US$9.8 million), fishing village access road construction and improvement (US$2.4 million), and technical assistance (US$1.4 million), would be provided by GOI to GOAP, together with GOI's contribution out of its own resources, in accordance with established GOI procedures for development assistance to GOAP.

4.08 Subloans under Credit Program. IDA funds for subloans for fishing vessels (US$3.4 million) and APFC's seafood processing plants (US$0.5 million) would be on-lent by GOI to ARDC. Details of credit arrangements would be generally consistent with those applicable to other Bank/IDA financed credit projects administered by ARDC and would include, among others, qualifying conditions for banks to operate as project Participating Banks (PBs), the requirement that APFC, PBs and ARDC maintain separate accounts for the project, insurance arrangements, debt rescheduling procedures, and ARDC's obligation to ensure that financial commitments for APFC's seafood processing facilities are made only after IDA is satisfied with respect to tender procedures and recommendations for award of contract.

4.09 The contributions required from different categories of borrowers for various investment activities, the fractions to be refinanced, and annual interest rates chargeable would be in accordance with the following schedule:

Fishing Fishing APFC Vessels Vessels Seafood (Cooperatives) (Pvt. Entities) Plants

Contribution

Borrower Contribution (min) 5% 15% 20% GOAP Loan (max) 15% - - PB Subloan (max) 80% 85% 80% ARDC Refinance ------80% of each subloan of PBs------GOI Contribution ------55% of ARDC's refinance------IDA Disbursement ------55% of ARDC's refinance------

Annual Interest Rates

PB Loans ------11.0% minimum------GOAP Loans ------11.0% minimum------ARDC Refinance ------8.0% minimum------GOI Loan to ARDC ------6.75%-7.25% with exchange risk borne by GOI IDA to GOI ------standard------18 -

4.10 Maximum terms of PB loans including maximum periods of grace would be in accordance with the following schedule, and PB repayments to ARDC would be scheduled to coincide with agreed schedule of collections from ultimate borrowers. ARDC would repay GOI loans at the end of ten years.

Maximum Term Maximum for PB Loans Grace Including Grace Period ------in years------

lOm MFVs 8 1 9m MFVs 8 1 12m Non-MFVs 6 1/2 APFC Seafood Plants 10 1

Procurement

4.11 Har'borWorks. Except for minor contracts for ancillary facilities and dredging work, contracts for harbor works at Visakhapatnam (US$6.5 million) and Kakinada (US$6.2 million) would be awarded through international competitive bidding in accordance with IDA guidelines, including IDA clearance of tender documents and award of contracts, and administered by the Visakhapatnam Port Trust (V]PT)under GOI and the Department of Ports of GOAP, respectively. EHarborworks at Nizampatnam would be relatively small (US$0.8 million), and it is most unlikely that foreign firms would be interested in so small a contract located in such a remote area. The contract for this work, therefore, would be awarded on the basis of local competitive bidding in accordance with procedures satisfactory to IDA, and administered by the GOAP Department of Ports. Dredging work would be carried out on force account by VPT at Viskhapatnam, by Lhe Ports Department (GOAP) at Kakinada and by the Irrigation Department at Nizampatnam. Minor contracts for ancillaries would be awarded through local competitive bidding satisfactory to IDA. The crawler crane and its accessories required for 1-heViskahapatnam harbor slipway would cost about Rs 1.7 million (US$198,000) and be procured through local competitive bidding.

4.12 VilLage Access Roads and Water Supply. As the sites are numerous (over 20) and widely scattered and the value of work at each site is expected to be small (on average about US$250,000), contracts for village access road works (US$3.5 million in total) and the village water supply work (US$0.1 mil- Lion) would be awarded on the basis of competitive bidding satisfactory to IDA according to local practices and administered by the Executive Engineer attached to the District Collector's Office concerned.

4.13 Fishing Vessels. All project fishing vessels (US$6.9 million for 420 vessels of three standard designs) would be built by KBBY and independent boat builders using KBBY designs, and purchased by sub-borrowers (individuals, cooperatives and business firms) through ordinary commercial channels. The current practice wherein the purchaser of vessel is permitted to indicate preference for specific make of engine, gear and outfit appears to be sound and practical. The cost of each vessel is relatively small (about US$20,000 - 19 -

per lOm MFV, US$12,000 per 9m MFV, and US$4,000 per Non-MFV), and bulking would serve no useful purpose. The two trial wooden hull trawlers would be constructed by the APFC-owned KBBY, and APFC would be paid the actual construction costs.

4.14 Seafood Processing Plants. Civil works for the seafood processing '7lants to be owned and operated by APFC at Visakhapatnam (US$216,000) and Nizampatnam (US$33,000) would not be suitable for international competitive bidding because the contracts would be very small. They would therefore be awarded on the basis of local competitive bidding administered by APFC. Equip- ment for the plants (US$675,000 and US$140,000, respectively) would be bulked to the extent possible and procured by APFC on the basis of international competitive bidding in accordance with IDA guidelines, including IDA clearance of tender documents and award of contracts, if the estimated cost involved is US$200,000 or more, and through local competitive bidding satisfactory to IDA if it is less than US$200,000 but US$50,000 or more. Equipment costing less than US$50,000 would be procured by APFC on the basis of quotations received from interested suppliers with due regard for economy and efficiency.

4.15 Preference for Domestic Contractors. Domestic contractors would receive a preference of 7.5% for civil works, and the usual preferential margin equal to either 15% of the c.i.f. cost of competing imports or the existing rate of import duty, whichever is lower, for equipment.

Disbursement

4.16 Disbursement of the IDA credit would be in accordance with the following schedule:

(i) 50% (about US$9.8 million) of expenditures on project harbor works at Visakhaptnam, Kakinada and Nizampatnam, including works awarded under ICB, totalling about US$19.4 million;

(ii) 50% (about US$2.4 million) of expenditures on project village access roads and Nizampatnam water supply totaling about US$4.9 million;

(iii) 55% (about US$3.9 million) of ARDC disbursements of about US$7.1 million for 80% refinancing of loans (about US$8.7 million) provided by participating banks to finance project fishing vessels and seafood processing facilities including insulated trucks with a total estimated cost of about US$10.8 million; and

(iv) 100% (US$1.4 million) of expenditures on technical assistance (consultants, study tours and wooden hull pilot trawlers).

4.17 Disbursements under (i), (ii) and (iv) would be made against appropriate documentation and would not be made against any land costs, and those under (iii) would be against ARDC certified statements of loans made by PBs and refinanced by ARDC. Documents relating to (iii) would not be submitted - 20 -

to IDA for review, but would be retained by ARDC and be available for inspection by IDA during project supervision. A quarterly schedule of estimated disbursements is given in Annex 6.

Accounts and Audit

4.18 Separate accounts would be maintained for all project expenditures by all entities involved in project implementation. Accounts for activities listed under (i), (ii) and (iii) of para. 4.16 would be subject to standard government control and auditing procedures, which are satisfactory. For accounts under (iii), special audit requirements would not be necessary because audited ARDC accounts are sent to IDA/Bank each year as a requirement of ongoing IDA/ Bank projects and ARDC requires participating banks to maintain separate accounts for each approved subloan and to have these accounts audited. Assurances were obtained at negotiations that the above arrangements would be employed. Assurances were also obtained that APFC would maintain separate audited accounts for project components, and that these audited accounts would be sent to IDA within six months of the close of each financial year (June-July).

V. ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT

Coordination and Implementation

5.01 Project Coordinating Committee. Except for the Visakhapatnam harbor work which would be executed by the Visakhapatnam Port Trust (a Central Govern- ment agency), all project components other than the provision of credit would be executed byr GOAP. A Project Coordinating Committee (PCC) would be established, in which the lead agency would be the GOAP Department of Fisheries. P'CCwould be chaired by the Secretary of the Department of Forests and Rural Development. The Director of Fisheries would be the PCC secretary and would f'unctionas a project coordinator. Membership would include the following cifficials,the Secretary for the Ministry of Finance or his representative the Director of State Ports, the Managing Director of the Andhra Pradesh F'isheriesCorporation, the Chief Engineer of the Roads and Buildings Department, the Chief Engineer of the Panchayeti Raj Department and the Regional Director of ARDC. PCC would be empowered to obtain the services of other state officials as necessary, for example, the Directors of the Cooperative Department, Small Farmer Development Agency, and the Industries Department and the Chief Engineers for the Department of Public Health and the Electricity Board. PCC would be responsible for organizing execution of the project and would do this by delegating responsibilities to appropriate state agencies, including the Department of Fisheries. For example, the State Ports Department would be responsible for the construction of harbor improvements at Kakinada and Nizampatnam. A condition of effectiveness of the Credit would be that the PCC had been established with a chairman and secretary as indicated above.

5.02 GOI Central Coordinating Committee. The Central Coordinating Com- mittee established under the Gujarat Fisheries Project (Cr. 695-IN) would be expanded to include representation from Andhra Pradesh, and would provide policy guidance and work coordination for the project. - 21 -

5.03 District Subcommittees. District Subcommittees (DS) of the PCC would be formed for each of the project districts of Visakhapatnam, East Godavari and Guntur to coordinate activities of the implementing agencies at the field level. The subcommittees would coordinate with the District administration as necessary, particularly for the village access road construction.

5.04 GOAP Department of Fisheries. To enable it to carry out its function under the project, the Department of Fisheries (APFD) would form a new division for the project and set up a Fisheries Terminal Organization (FTO) for each of the three harbor sites which would function as the APFD field offices to supervise project execution and administer the fisheries facilities when completed. A Catch Monitoring Unit (CMU) would be established in APFD with direct technical links to the State statistical organization. CMU would collect and analyze data for each major category of vessels (23m trawlers and 9m and lOm MFVs) on (i) species composition of catch; (ii) size-frequency distribution of shrimp and at least two important fish species; and (iii) catch per unit of effort. APFD would also set up a Monitoring and Evaluation Unit (MEU) reporting to the Director of Fisheries to monitor and report on project problems and progress (see para 5.08).

5.05 GOAP State Ports Department. The State Ports Department (SPD) would plan and administer the construction of harbor works at Kakinada and Nizampatnam and subsequently be responsible for the maintenance of these works. At Visakhapatnam, which is under GOI control, the Visakhapatnam Port Trust (VPT) would plan and administer construction of fishing harbor works and make arrangements to operate the fishing harbor, slipway and repair facilities. For Nizampatnum, SPD would also coordinate with other relevant agencies of the Department of Transport, Roads and Buildings for harbor, training wall and approach road construction, and with the Irrigation Department for dredging. SPD currently operates a program of registration and licensing for mechanized fishing vessels using State ports, which, in addition to inspection and safety regulations, includes provision for bank liens on fishing vessel licenses to help provide security for MFV loans. SPD will coordinate with VPT to insure compatability and completeness of vessel registration and licensing in the State, and to help make suitable arrangements for endorsement of bank liens on MFVs licensed at the GOI-operated Visakhapatnam harbor. Present SPD management is effective and competent; however, SPD would require two additional engineering divisions, one each for Kakinada and Nizampatnam to supervise project works. In addition, it would provide sufficient port staff for operating the new harbor facilities at Kakinada and Nizampatnam.

5.06 GOAP Panchayati Raj Department. The Panchayati Raj Department 1/ would have responsibility for overseeing construction of project village access roads and the Nizampatnam water supply system. The Panchayati Raj Department provides engineering services for most other departments for specified community or village level small-scale development projects, including, for example, construction and maintenance of village roads, rural water schemes, small irrigation works, and schools. The Department is adequately staffed and has 250 engineers at the level of assistant engineer or higher, with executive

1/ Functions as a community or rural development department. - 22 -

engineers at district level who would plan and supervise village access road and water system construction. The Department would not require additional staff to undertake works for the project.

5.07 And'hra Pradesh Fisheries Corporation. The Andhra Pradesh Fisheries Corporation (APFC) would play a key role in the project. It would (i) build most of the project 9m and 10m MFVs at its Kakinada Boat Building Yard; (ii) 'build and operate two experimental 23m wooden hull trawlers; (iii) own and Dperate new seafood processing plants for freezing, ice supply and cold storage, one each at Visakhapatnam and Nizampatnam; (iv) help arrange GOAP 15% margin money loans for borrowers who need assistance to purchase project MFVs (see paras 4.03 and 5.10); and (v) procure, process and export most of the shrimp from project vessels and facilities. At the operating level, some changes in organization would be required under the project to ensure efficient and effective control of APFC operations by management, particularly as related to the project (See Chart 18381). General Managers at Visakhapatnam and Kakinada and an Assistant General Manager at Nizampatnam would be assigned to oversee dlay-to-day operations and project implementation at each project site, reporting to the APFC Managing Director. Two new units, a Project Management Unit and a Financial Control Unit, would be set up to help the Managing Director monitor and coordinate project programs and APFC operations. In view of the greatly expanded financial commitments required for effective execution of 'projectactivities, GOAP would be required to (i) provide additional share capital resources (estimated at Rs.5.0 million) and (ii) complete the evaluation of State-owned assets transferred to APFC. In addition, GOAP would have APFC's Balance Sheets and Profit and Loss Accounts for 1975-76 and 1976-77 audited by the statutory auditors and provide copies of the auditor's reports to IDA by September 30, 1978; the 1977-78 audit report would be provided to IDA by December 31, 1978.

Monitoring and Evaluation

.5.08 On the basis of the detailed project implementation plan, the Mon- itoring and Evaluation Unit (MEU) to be established in APFD would monitor and compare actual with expected project progress, and APFC and other agencies involved would cooperate with MEU. IDA would receive Quarterly Progress Reports from APFD covering the various project components, including where applicable information on tendering, bid awards, procurement and disbursements, and also specific information on departmental staffing as related to project activities. ]Each report would, in addition, provide specific data on the Andhra Pradesh Fisheries Coriporation, including staffing, progress, activities, and financial 'performance,as well as information on activities and results of the APFD Catch Monitoring Unit (CMU) to be established (see para 5.04). These Progress 'Reportsand periodic IDA supervision missions would help to ensure the adequacy of monitoring and evaluation, to anticipate, identify and evaluate problems, and to take ac:tionsnecessary. NEU would also have prepared an evaluation study designed specifically to measure the impact of the various project components and the extent to which the project produces benefits as assumed at appraisal. The study would provide information on conditions before the project, changes occurring during the project and conditions after project completion in order to assist in the design of future fisheries projects. Assurances would be obtained that APFD would establish MEU and CMU by December 31, '1978. - 23 -

Credit Organization

5.09 Agricultural Refinance and Development Corporation. ARDC would be responsible for: -

(i) refinancing loans by Participating Banks (PBs) to individuals, cooperatives or companies for project fishing vessels;

(ii) refinancing loans by PBs to APFC for seafood processing facilities; and

(iii) assisting PBs and prospective borrowers to prepare and evaluate investment plans.

ARDC would prepare a project banking plan, which is a standard feature of other bank-group operations involving ARDC, and it would be a condition of effectiveness that the banking plan was acceptable to IDA. At this time, ARDC is operating satisfactorily in 30 IDA-assisted projects in the agricultural sector. 1/

5.10 Institutional Assistance to Small Fishermen. Under the project, commercial banks and Central and State Cooperative Banks would provide credit to fishermen for fishing vessels and to APFC for seafood processing facilities. To assist smaller fishermen in purchasing MFVs, some loans would be made through existing GOAP programs for margin money loans. In addition to government programs to assist smaller fishermen such as the SFDA, BCC and the Industries Department (see para 2.18), GOAP would provide MFV loans to small individual or group borrowers for 15% of the investment cost, with banks providing 80% of the cost and borrowers contributing equity of 5%; APFC helps small borrowers obtain these MFV loans, acts as a financial intermediary for the loans, and assists with loan payment collection. Under the project, these loans would be on terms similar to the bank loans and collected concurrently.

VI. PROJECT PRODUCTION, MARKETING AND PRICES

Production

6.01 At full development in about 1983, the project's annual incremental output from fishing vessels financed under the project and vessels expected to use project harbors would be about 21,000 tons of fish valued at US$2.0 million and about 5,000 tons of shrimp valued at US$15.7 million on the basis of

1/ For the most recent appraisal of ARDC, see Second Agricultural Refinance and Development Corporation Credit Project, Report No. 1520-IN, May 12, 1977 for IDA Credit No. 715-IN totalling US$200.0 million. - 24 -

September 1977 landed prices. Most of the shrimp would be exported. In addition, an incremental annual production of about 10,000 tons of fish valued al: Rs 14.3 milLion (US$1.7 million) is expected as a result of project access roads for fishing villages.

Marketing

6.02 Export market prospects for shrimp, the project's major product, are excellent. Most of the world's best shrimp resources are already fully exploited and, as incomes increase, world shrimp demand is expected to conti- nile rising. India is currently the world's largest producer and largest ex- porter of shrimp, and holds about 20% of the world market. This project will help India to further advance her strong position in the world shrimp trade by both increasing production for export and improving quality. Expected incremental shrimp exports from the project would total 5% of exports from India and constitute less than 1% of expected world shrimp trade when the project reaches full development in 1983.

6.03 Domestic market demand appears sufficient to absorb the 31,000 tons of incremental fish production expected annually from the project. As indicated in the Gujarat appraisal, GOI forecasts indicate that consumption osE fish by the fish eating population of India would increase at an average annual rate of about 6.5% (about 130,000 tons annually) to 1985, which appears realistic in vilew of past annual growth rates of about 8% over the last decade, expected real income increases, and the growing consumer awareness of fish as a chief source of protein. Annual incremental fish production from the project would represent about 1.0% of projected total Indian fish consumption whken the project reaches full development in 1983.

6.04 A major emphasis of the project would be to improve quality and marketing of shrimp exports. Most of the project's incremental shrimp production would be procured by APFC and processed in facilities financed under the project. Some of the fish would be procured and marketed locally by APFC. Although fish is a relatively small part of the project's expected total incremental value product, the project would attempt to improve fish marketing by means of constructing fishing village access roads and by having APFC to take a leading role in opening up new markets. APFC currently has underway a study intended to help it improve the efficiency of its fish marketing operations.

PIrices

6.05 Prices used for project financial projections are based on average prices receivedl by fishermen at landing sites in September 1977. Given the expected growth in demand, especially with respect to shrimp exports, and the exceptionally high quality of the shrimp resource and expected improvement in quality of processing shrimp, the use of these prices on a constant basis for proje!ctevaluation is reasonable. Prices used average Rs 26,400 (U[S$3,070)per ton for shrimp and Rs 818 (US$95) per ton for fish caught by project vessels. For village fishermen, average prices received for fish are expected to increase by 6.7% to an average for all species caught at - 25 -

Rs 1,430 per ton due to decreased transport and marketing costs and more competition among fish traders as villages become more accessible. Export price of Rs 59,000 (US$6,800) per ton is assumed, based on 1977 prices received by APFC for exported shrimp.

VII. FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Financial Analysis

7.01 The project's financial benefits would consist primarily of (i) the value of incremental catch resulting from project vessels and improved productivity of the subsistence fishermen who would be served by the project access roads, (ii) the incremental increase in landed catch prices due to improved quality of the fish marketed by the subsistence fishermen benefiting from project access roads and the shrimp processed by APFC's new plants, and (iii) the value of generally improved services of project harbors as indicated by increased port revenues from wharfage and docking fees. At full development, proposed project investments are expected to yield annual incremental landings of about 36,000 tons of fish and shrimp valued at US$29.4 million.

7.02 The project investments (US$10.8 million, or 30% of total project cost) which warrant separate calculations are expected to yield the following financial rates of return:

10m MFVs 31% 9m MFVs 34% 12m Non-MFVs 36% Seafood Plants over 100%

Estimated financial rates of return are based on cash flow projections shown in Annex 4.

Cost Recovery of Investment in Harbors

7.03 At present no unified system of user charges for fishing warfage exists in India. As part of the ongoing Gujarat Fisheries Project, however, GOI has undertaken to carry out a review of its policy on the recovery of investments in fishing harbor facilities. GOI policy guidelines resulting from this review are expected in July 1978, and should have an important bearing on the cost recovery measures to be taken with respect to project harbor investments. In lieu of what may eventually result from this review, GOAP plans to introduce its own cost recovery program in the form of wharfage and port fees to be charged to vessels using these harbors. It is anticipated that the level of fees finally adopted will be consistent with GOI policy guidelines.

Economic Analysis

7.04 For the credit components, estimated economic rates of return are higher than the financial rates, but only slightly because the duties and - 26 - taxes involved and the effect of the shadow exchange rate, which constitute the only necessary adjustments, are not large.

7.05 Village access roads would provide fishermen with better and faster access to markets. The impact of these relatively modest investments of US$16,000/km of road would be considerable. Estimated benefits to village fishermen include an increase in average landed prices for fish from Rs 1.34/kg without the project to Rs 1.43/kg with the project due primarily to improved quality, and an increase in production from 25,800 tons without the project t:o 35,800 tons with the project due to increased prices and improved access to markets and services. Using these assumptions, the estimated average economic rate of return is 40% (42% for Visakhapatnam, 52% for East Godavari and 23% for Gtmtur). For details of these analyses, see Annex 5, Table 1.

7.06 For the purpose of the economic evaluation of project investments, each harbor has been considered as a composite undertaking involving harbor works, vessels and, in the case of Visakhapatnam and Nizampatnam, seafood plants. On the basis of costs and benefits of these constituent investments, t:he estimated rate of return is 28% for Visakahapatnam, 45% for Kakinada, and 17% for Nizampatnam. The average for all of these three harbors is 34%. Sensitivity analyses show that with a combination of 20% investment cost overrun and 20% benefit reduction, the estimated economic rate of return is 19% for Visakhapatnam, 33% for Kakinada and 11% for Nizampatnam (See Annex 5, Tables 2 to 4).

7.07 The estimated overall economic rate of return for the entire project investment (US$33.9 million or 93% of total project cost) is 35%, excluding the technical assistance component, most of which is not directly required for implementation of the project and is oriented toward general marine fisheries development assistance. In the economic analysis, a standard conversion iEactor of 1.14, Rs 10 = US$1.00, was used to approximate the economic value t:o the economy of foreign exchange used and earned by the project.

Project Beneficiaries

7.08 Most: of the project beneficiaries would be poor fishermen. These would include many of the 75,000 members of the subsistence fishermen communi- lies presently living in isolated fishing villages which would be linked to market outlets through the access roads to be constructed under the project, and the 2,500 fishermen who would find jobs on project vessels. While the ownership of the vessels would be with rural entrepreneurs, cooperatives and business companies, the benefit accruing to the fishermen would be considerable because ithe typical vessel would be fairly profitable and the crew would receive a share of gross sales in addition to wages. For example, the share For each crew member would total about Rs 5,200 annually for lOm MFVs. (See Annex 4). Additional beneficiaries would include several hundred workers required for project shore facilities. - 27 -

Long Term Development Impact

7.09 In the long run, perhaps the most important contribution of the project would be its expected effect on the development of deep-sea fisheries by India. At present, most motorized fishing operate on a day-return basis, and India has virtually no deep-sea fishing capability despite the very rich resources of adjoining oceans. The project fleet and facilities for servicing 23m trawlers would be an early step in the development of a deep-sea fishing industry. In addition, the fishing village access road component would be an important beginning in attempting to help large numbers of subsistence fishermen to improve their lot.

Risks

7.10 The only risks of the project would be the degree of possible over- harvesting of shrimp resources in the near shore areas, and the constraints to project development if the project 9m MFVs were to have difficulty in negotiating the shallow bar at the Nizampatnam harbor entrance under adverse weather conditions. The resource base appears to be adequate, however, and to prevent possible over-fishing, the project would institute a catch monitoring system as discussed in paras 5.04 and 5.08. The risk attending the Nizampatnam harbor entrance, given the underlying physical contours, does not appear to be significantly reducible at acceptable investment cost. The project harbor consultant would, however, attempt to explore such possibilities as exist. Under the circumstances as discussed (para 3.05) and with adequate vessel safety precautions as indicated (para 3.10), the risk is considered acceptable.

Environmental Effect

7.11 The project would have an insignificant effect on the environment, and such effects as may occur would be justified in view of the substantial economic and social benefits expected to occur. The port administrative service would be responsible for preventing possible pollution which might result from unregulated proliferation of motorized vessels.

VIII. RECOMMENDATIONS

8.01 Assurances have been obtained at negotiations that:

(i) GOI would:

(a) GOAP to hire for SPD a qualified Project Engineer acceptable to IDA by December 31, 1978 and a consultant specialist in estuarial river training works on terms and conditions acceptable to IDA (para 3.20);

(b) cause GOAP to hire, by December 31, 1979, a qualified naval architect acceptable to IDA to assist KBBY in the development of wooden hull shrimp trawlers on terms and conditions acceptable to IDA (para 3.20); - 28 -

(c) cause GOAP to construct two experimental wooden hull shrimp trawlers under technical assistance and to cause APFC to operate these vessels by December 31, 1981 (para 3.20);

(d) cause GOAP to plan and undertake an overseas study tour for APFC and other fisheries officials and personnel engaged in processing, marketing and quality control of seafood for export by December 31, 1979 (para 3.20);

(e) cause VPT to administer the procurement of project fishing harbor work at Visakhapatnam and to be responsible for its operation (para 4.11);

(f) cause VPT to make necessary arrangements, by December 31, :1978, to operate the fishing harbor, slipway and repair facilities at Visakhapatnam (para 5.05); and

(g) cause VPT in conjunction with GOAP to make provision for endorsement of bank liens on licenses of mechanized vessels registered at Visakhapatnam harbor by June 30, :1979 (para 5.05).

(ii) GOAP would:

(a) include the harbor entrance at Nizampatnam within the seaward limits of the Port under the jurisdiction of SPD, and make their best efforts to ensure that the entrance channel would be maintained at a minimum water depth in the entrance of at least 1.0 meter (para 3.05);

(b) cause APFC to maintain separate accounts for project components and to provide IDA with audited accounts 'within six months of the close of each financial year (para 4.18);

(c) cause APFD to establish a Catch Monitoring Unit and a project Monitoring and Evaluation Unit by December 31, 1978 (para 5.04);

(d) cause APFD to develop a detailed work plan for catch monitoring satisfactory to IDA by June 30, 1979 (para 5.04);

(e) establish a Fisheries Terminal Organization at each of the three project harbor sites (in conjunction with VPT at Visakhapatnam) to superintend project fisheries activities (para 5.04); - 29 -

(f) provide additional share capital to APFC of Rs 2.0 million by June 30, 1979 and Rs 3.0 million by June 30, 1980 (para 5.07);

(g) complete the evaluation of assets transferred to APFC by June 30, 1979, and provide IDA with a summary of the evaluation upon its completion (para 5.07);

(h) cause APFC to set up a Project Management Unit and a Financial Control Unit and assign a qualified General Manager for Visakhapatnam, another for Kakinada, and an Assistant General Manager for Nizampatnam by June 30, 1979 (para 5.07); and

(i) cause APFC to have its Balance Sheets and Profit and Loss Accounts for audited by qualified auditors acceptable to IDA and provide copies of the auditor's reports to IDA by September 30, 1978 for 1975-76 and 1976-77, and by December 31, 1978 for 1977-78;

(j) provide IDA with quarterly progress reports on project activities (para 5.08); and

(k) finalize and inform IDA of specific terms and conditions for its loans to assist small fishermen purchase fishing vessels under the project (para 5.10).

(iii) ARDC would maintain separate audited accounts for project components, and these audited accounts would be sent to IDA within four months of the close of each financial year (para 4.18).

8.02 Conditions of effectiveness would be that:

(i) a Project Coordinating Committee at the state level had been established by GOAP (para 5.01); and

(ii) a banking plan satisfactory to IDA had been received by IDA (para 5.09).

8.03 With the above assurances and conditions, the proposed project would be suitable for an IDA Credit of US$17.5 million on standard IDA terms.

ANNEX I

INDIA

ANDHRA PRADESH FISHERIES PROJECT

Andhra Pradesh Fisheries Corporation

Financial Position Summary (Rs million)

1974-75 1975-76 1976-77 (July - June)

Borrowings 0.92 0.91 2.13

Other Liabilities 4.97 5.30 6.67

Paid-up Capital 5.59 5.59 6.59

Retained Earnings (0.04) (0.54) (0.43)

Total Equity and Liabilities 11.44 11.26 14.96

Cash and Bank Deposits 2.96 0.79 0.12

Closing Stocks and Current Assets 5.76 3.38 5.14

Loans and Advances - 1.79 2.70

PreliminaryPayments 0.05 0.05 0.05

Sundry Debtors 0.02 0.87 1.42

Fixed Assets 2.50 4.38 5.33

Other Investments 0.15 - 0.20

Total Assets 11.44 11.26 14.96 ANNEX 2 Table I

INDIA

ANDHRA PRADESH FISHERIES PROJECT

Fishing Vessels

Estimated Fishing Vessel Fleet Size in Project Districts

Visakhapatnam East Godavari Guntur ------Present Fleet------

Non-ME'Vs 8,074 2,778 1,330 MFVs 275 410 25 Trawlers 22 - -

------Vessels Added Under the Project-----

Non-MFVs - - 60 MFVs 150 150 60 Trawlers - -

------…Fleet at Full Development /a------

Non-MFVs 8,074 2,778 1,330 MFVs 370 478 72 Trawlers 50 15 -

/a Assumed vessel attrition during the project period is 20% for MFVs and 10% for trawlers; outside private investment is expected to balance attrition for non-MFVs (including 60 vessels under the project), and add 30 trawlers at Visakhapatnam and 15 at Kakinada. ANNEX 2 Table 2

INDIA

ANDHRA PRADESH FISHERIES PROJECT

Fishing Vessels

Description of Fishing Vessels for Project Harbors /a

lOm 9m 12m 23 m Trawler /b MFV MFV Non-MFV Steel Wood7c Wood Wood Wood

Length Overall (m) 23.00 23.97 10.33 9.14 12.00

Length at Water Line (m) 21.25 22.16 9.60 8.53 11.00

Beam (m) 7.20 7.42 2.90 2.60 3.00

Depth (m) 3.56 3.51 1.22 1.01 1.45

Draft - Maximum (m) 2.60 2.90 1.14 1.00 0.60

Displacement (tons) 140.00 155.00 8.19 4.86 7.00

Power (shaft hp) 380-500 400-450 45-60 40-50 sail-oars

Crew (men) 13 13 5 5 7

Normal Endurance (days) 14 14 1 1 4-5

Equipped Cost (Rs '000) 4,500.00 - /d 169.00 108.50 36.00

Number in Project 30 2 300 60 60

/a Not specifications.

/b Trawler to include complete freezing and refrigeration system for shrimp and approximately 100 hp in two auxiliary diesel engines for electricity generation, hydraulic pumps and refrigeration; trawler to be adaptable for other types of fishing besides shrimp trawling. Only the two wooden hull trawlers are financed by the project.

Ic Experimental wooden hull trawlers to be constructed under technical assistance and operated by APFC.

/d Based on current construction costs, estimated cost of wooden hull trawlers fully equipped ranges between Rs 3.5 to 4.0 million. INDIA ANNEX 3 Table 1 ANDIIRAPRADESH FISHERIES PROJECT

Project Cost Estimates

----- Rs '000 ------US$ '000------Foreign Local Foreign Total Local Foreign Total Exchange Harbors Visakhapatnam Base Cost Estimate 56,235 - 56,235 6,539.0 - 6,539.0 - Physical Contingencies 7,150 - 7,150 831.4 _ 831.4 - Subtotal 63,385 - 63,385 6,370.4 - 6,370.4 - Kakinada Base Cost Estimate 53,020 - 53,020 6,165.1 - 6,165.1 - Physical Contingencies 7,557 - 7,557 878.7 878.7 - Subtotal 60,577 - 60,577 7,043.8 - 7,043.8 - Nizampatnam

Base Cost Estimate 6,960 - 6,96b 809.3 - 809.3 - Physical Contingencies 946 - 946 110.0 110.0 - Subtotal 7,906 - 7,906 919.3 - 919.3 -

Total Harbors 131,868, .131,868 15,333.5 - 15,333.5 -

Village Roads and Water Supply Visakhapatnam District .BaseCost Estimate 12,315 - 12,315 1,432.0 - 1,432.0 - Physical Contingencies 1,232 1,232 143.2 - 143.2 - Subtotal 13,547 _ 13,547 1,575.2 - 1,575.2 - East Godavari District Base Cost Estimate 9,000 - 9,000 1,046.5 - 1,046.5 - Physical Contingencies 900 _ 900 104.7 - 104.7 - Subtotal 9,900 - 9,900 1,151.2 - 1,151.2 GinaturDistrict Base Cost Estimate 9,248 - 9,248 1,075.3 - 1,075.3 - .PhysicalContingencies 925 925 107.6 - 107.6 - Subtotal 10,173 - 10,173 1,182.9 - 1,182.9 - Village Water Supply .ase Cost Estimate 485 - 485 56.4 - 56.4 - Physical Contingencies 15 - 15 1.7 - 1.7 - Subtotal 500 - 500 58.1 - 58.1 -

Total Roads and Water 34,120 - 34,120 3,967.4 - 3,967.4 -

Fishing Vessels

lon MFVs (300) 50,700 - 50,700 5,895.3 - 5,895.3 - 9m MFVs (60) 6,510 - 6,510 757.0 - 757.0 - 12unNon-MFVs (60) 2,160 - 2,160 251.2 - 251.2 -

Total Vessels (420) 59,370 - 59,370 6,903.5 - 6,903.5 -

Seafood Processing Facilities Visakhapatnam Base Cost Estimate 8,150 30 8,180 947.7 3.5 951.2 - PhysicalContingencies 186 - 186 21.5 - 21.5 - Subtotal 8,366 30 8,366 969.2 3.5 972.7 - Nizampatnam Base Cost Estimate 1,660 - 1,660 193.0 - 193.0 - PhysicalContingencies 28 - 28 3.3 - 3.3 - Subtotal 1,688 - 1,688 196.3 - 196.3 -

Total Seafood Processing 10,024 30 10,054 1,165.5 3.5 1,169.0 -

Technical Assistance River Training Speciialist 207 - 207 - - NavralArchitect - 473 473 - 55.0 55.0 100% Overseas Study Tour - 900 900 - 104.7 104.7 100% 8 Wood Hull Trawlers 10,000 - 10,000 1,162. _ 1,162.8 -

Total Technical Assistance 10,207 1,373 11,580 1,186.9 159.6 1,346.5 12%

Total With Physical Contingencie's 245,589 1,403 246,992 28,556.9 163.1 28,720.0 1%

ASPAI) April 1978 INDIA

ANDHRA PRADESH FISHERIES PROJECT

Project Costs

Expected Price Increases

1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 Total Expected Plrice Increase Rates

Civil Works 8% 8% 8% 8% 8% 8% - Equipment - Local 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% - Equipment - Foreign 7.5% 7.5% 7% 7% 7% 7% -

Civil Works Base Cost Estimate 1/ - 33,988 59,344 48,040 630 - 142,002 Piysical Contingencies _ 4,414 8,245 6,185 95 - 18,939 Sub-total - 38,402 67,589 54,225 725 - 160,941 Expected Price Increases _ 6,372 17,575 17,839 341 - 42,127 Total Civil Works - 44,774 85,164 72,064 1,066 - 203,068

Equipment - Local base Cost Estimate 1/ 9,258 19,273 15,140 14,540 16,230 74,441 Expected Price Increases 1,343 4,337 4,7 5,870 8,193 24,453 Total lhocalEquipment - 10,601 23,610 19,850 20,410 24,423 98,894

Equipment - Foreign Base Cost Estimate 1/ - 30 - - 30 Expected IPrice Increases _ _ 6 - 6 Total Foreign Equipment - 36 - _ 36

Technical Assistance 1,196 5,148 5,236 - - 11,580 c|

Total Expected Price Increases - 7,715 21,918 22,549 6,211 8,193 66,586

Total Project Cost 56,571 113,958 97,150 21,476 24,423 313,578

Price Increase as Percent of Base Cost Plus Contingencies - - - - - 21%

1/ Civil W4orks Base Cost includes engineering, and also land at Visakhapatnam. All Base Costs are based on September 1977.

ASPAD April 1978 A',.%X 3 Table 3

INDIA

AND1IRAPRADISH FISILERIES PP.OJFCT

Project Cost Estimates

InifrastructtLre Components (Rs '000)

1979 1980 1981 ]982 Total Harbors Visakhapatnam Civil Works 8,667 21,667 13,000 - 43,334 Equipment - 3,540 - - 3,540 Land Acquisition - - 4,674 - 4,674 Engineering (10%) 867 2,520 1,300 - _4_,87 Suib-total Base Cost 9,534 27, 727 18,974 - 56,235 7 Physical Contingencies (15%) 1,430 3,575 2,145 - ,150 Sub-total 10,964 31,302 21,119 - 63,385 Kakinada Civil Works 9,160 18,370 18,320 - 45,800 Equipment - 1,600 800 - 2,400 Engineering (10%) 916 _1992 1,912 - 4,820 Sub-total Base Cost 10,076 21,912 21,032 - 53,020 Physical Contingencies (15%) 1,S]] _3_, 023 3,023 -- 7,57 Sub-total 11,587 24,935 24,055 - 60.577 Nizampatniam Civil Works 860 2,006 2,293 573 5,732 Equipment - 405 190 - 595 Engineering i(1O0) 86 242 248 5' 633 Sub-total Base Cost 946 2,653 2,731 630 6,960 Physical Contingencies (15%) 142 331 378 95 946 Sub-total 1,088 2,984 3,109 725 7,906 Base Cost Estimate Civil Works .L/ 20,556 46,192 36,974 630 104,352 Equipment - 'Local - 6,100 1,089 - 7,189 Land Acquisition - - 4 h74 - Sub-total Base Cost 20,556 52,292 42,737 630 116,715 Physical Contiingencies 3,083 6924I 5,546 9L IS 6'e3 Sub-total 23,639 59,22] 48,283 725 131,868 Expected 3'rice Increases 2/ Civil Works 3,924 13,812 15,307 343 33,384 Equipment - 1.372 339 - 1,7]] Sub-total 3,924 15,184 15,646 341 35,095

Total Harbors 27,563 74,40, 63,929 1,066 166,963

Village Roads and Water Supply Visakhapatnam Civil Works Base Cost 1/ 4,926 4,926 2,463 - 12,315 Physical Contingencies ?lZ) 493 493 246 - 1,232 Sub-total 5,419 5,419 2,709 - 13.547 East Godavari Civil Works Base Cost 1/ 3,600 3,600 1,800 - 9,000 Physical Contingencies b10%) 360 360 180 - 900 Sub-total 3,960 3,960 1,980 - 9,900 Guntor District: Civil Works Base Cost 1/ 3,699 3,699 1,850 - 9,248 Physical Contingencies (10%) 370 370 1R5 _ 925 Sub-total 4,069 4,069 2,035 - 10,173 Nizampatniam Water Supply Civil Works 1/ 280 - - - 280 Equipment 205 - - - 205 Sub-total Base Cost 485 - - - 485 Physical Contingencies (5%) 15 - - - 15 Sub-total Water Supply 500 - - - 500 Base Cost Estimate Civil Works 1/ 12,505 12,225 6,113 - 30,843 Equipment 205 - - - 205 Sub-total Base Cost 12,710 12,225 6,113 - 31,048 Physical Contingencies 1,238 611 611- 3,072 Sub-total. 13,948 13,448 6,724 - 34,120 Expected Price Increases 2/ Civil Works 2,278 3,497 2,421 - 8,196 Equiipment - Local 30 - - _ 30 Suh-tota3 2,308 3,497 2,421 - 8,226

Total Roads and Vater Supply 16,256 16,945 9,145 - 42,346

Total Tnfranstrcture Components 43,819 91,350 73,074 1,066 209,309

1/ Includes enginreering. 2/ For vxpe(tcd price increase rates, see Annca 4, Table 2; rates applied to the sum oi Base Cost, Engineerintg and Physical Contingencies.

ASPAD April 1978 INDIA ANNEX3 Table 4 ANDI{RAPRADESH FISHERIES PROJECT

Project Cost Estimates

Credit Components, Technical Assistance and Total Cost

1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 Total Fishing Vessels lOm MFV Unit Cost 169 169 169 169 169 169 Number of Units 4° so 60 70 80 300 Sub-total 6,760 10,140 11,830 13,5'20 50,700 9nmMTV Unit Cost lo8.5 108.5 108.5 108.5 108.5 108.5 Number of Units - - 20 20 20 60 Sub-total - - 2,170 2,170 2,170 6,510 12m Non-I,FV Unit Cost 36 36 36 36 36 36 Number of Units 10 10 10 15 1S 60 Sub-total 360 360 360 540 4o 2,160 Base Cost Estimate 7,120 8,810 12,670 14,',4o 16,230 59,310 Expected Price Increases / 1,033 1,982 3,941 5,870 8,193 21,019 Total All Vessels 8,153 10,792 16,611 24,410 24,423 80,389

Seafood Processing Facilities Visakhapatnam Civil Works 927 927 - - - 1,854 Equi.pment 1 933 4 393 - 6.3 Sub-total Base Cost 25,320 - - - Physical Contingencies (10%) 93 93 - - - 1^6 Sub-total Plant 3 5,413 - - -,36 Nizampatnam Civil Works - - 279 - - 279 Equipment - - 1 381 - - 1.R1q Sub-total Base Cost - - - - 1,660 Physical Contingencies (10%) - - 28 - - Sub-tota.l.Plant__1-_1," Base Cost Pln Tl,8 Civil Works 927 927 279 - 2,133 Equipment - Local 1,933 4,363 1,381 - 7,677 Equipment- Foreign - 30 - - - 30 Sub-total Base Cost 2,850 5,320 1, - -M9,840 PhnysicalContingencies 93 3 _'8 - - 14 Sub-total 2,953 5,413 1, b6 - - Expected Price Increases 1 Civil Works 170 266 ill. - 547 Equipment - Local 280 983 430 - 1,693 Equipment- Foreign - 6 - - -9 Sub-total . 455 1,25S - 2,246

Total Processing 3,403 6,668 2,229 - - 12,300

Technical Assistance River Training Specialist 138 69 - _ 207 Naval Architect 158 79 236 - - 473 Overseas Study Tour 900 _ _ _ _ 900 Wooden Hull Trawlers - 5,000 5.000 - 10,000 Sub-total Base Cost 1,196 5,148 5,236 - - llt580

Total Credit and Technical Assistance 12,752 22,608 24.076 20,410 24,423 104.269

Total Project Cost 56,571 113,958 97,150 21,476 24,423 313,578

2 For expected price increase rates, see Annex 4, Table 2. April 1978,- ASPAD ANNEX 3 Table S

INDIA

ANDIIRAPRADESH FISIIERIES PROJECT

Estimated Base Cost as of Septeinber 1977

Harbors (Rs '000)

US$ '000 jiaakhapatnsm Local Foreign Total Equivalent Civil Works PrelimirnaryWorks 575 - 575 66.9 AdditiorialQuay Works 34,836 - 34,836 4050.7 AdditiornalSlipway Facilities 1,908 - 1,908 221.9 Rock Dredging 1,966 - 1,966 228.6 Buildings 1,733 - 1,733 206.2 Roads, Drains and Culverts 989 - 989 115.0 Water Stipply 287 - 287 33.4 Power SIpply 1,tOO - 1,000 116.3 Subtotal 43,334 - 43,334 5038.8 Equipment AdditiornalSlipway Facilities 2,576 - 2,576 299.5 Power Stipply 964 - 964 112.1 Subtotal 3,540 - 3,540 411.6 Land Acquisition 4,674 - 4,674 543.5 Subtotal Harbor Works 51,548 - 51.548 5994.0 Engineerirng 4t68 - 4,687 545.0 Subtotal Base Cost 56,235 - 56,235 6539.0 Physical Contingencies (15%) 7 150 _ 7,150 831.4 Total Visakhapatnam 63,385 - 63,385 7370.4 Kakinada Civil Works Breakwat:er 25,000 - 25,000 2,907.0 Landing Quay 3,500 - 3,500 407.0 Outfitting-Borthing Quay 1,600 - 1,600 186.0 Berthing Quay 3,900 - 3,900 453.4 Trawler Quay 5,000 - 5,000 581.4 Auction Hall;. 1,800 - 1,800 209.3 Dredging Chznnels and Basin 2,000 - 2,000 232.6 Boat Repair Facility and Crane 500 - 500 58.1 Buildings 530 - 530 61.6 Roads and Drainage 530 - 530 61.6 Servicesiand Utilities 1,440 - 1,440 167.4 Subtotal 45,800 - 45,800 5,325.5 Equipment Boat Repair Facility and Crane 1,000 - 1,000 116.3 Services and Utilities l - 1,400 162.8 Subtotal 2,400 - 2,400 279.1 Subtol.alP1rbor Works 48,200 - 48,790 5,604.6 Engineering 4,820 - 4,820 560.5 Subtot:alBase Cost 53,020 - 53,020 6,165.1 Physical Contiagencies (15%) 7.557 - 7.557 878.7 Total Kakinada 60,577 - 60,577 7,043.8 Nizampatiam Civil Works Dredging and Excavation 836 - 836 97.2 Revetmeat 173 - 173 20.1 Quay Wall with Ramp 1,392 - 1,392 161.9 Auction Hall 396 - 396 46.0 SurfacinigHarbor Area 352 - 352 40.9 Buildings 253 - 153 29.4 Approach Road 1,747 - 1,747 203.2 Marine and Maintenance Facilities 85 - 85 9.9 Services and Utilities 498 - 498 57.9 Subtoital 5,732 - 5,732 666.5 Equipment Repair Facilities 215 - 215 25.0 Services and Utilities 360 - 3&0 44.2 Subtoital 595 - 595 69.2 Subtotal Harbor Works 6,327 - 6,337 735.7 Enginieerinig 633 - 633 73.6 Subtotal Base Cost 6,960 - 6,960 809.3 Physical Contingencies (15%) 946 - 946 110.0 Total Nizampatnam 7,906 - 7,906 919.3 Base Cost Estimate Civil Worls 94 ,866 - 94,866 11,030.9 Equipment 6,535 - 6,535 759.9 Land Acquisition 4 674 - 4,674 543.5 Engineerinig 10,140 _ _n, 140 , 179.1 SubtnLal. Base Cost 16, 215 - 116,215 13,513.4 Physical Contingencies 15 653 - 15,653 ],820.1 Total with Contingencies 131,868 - 131,668 15,333.5

ASPAD April 1978 ANNEX i Table 6 INDIA Page 1 of 2

ANDHRAPRADESII FISHERIES PROJECT

Estimated Base Cost as of September 1977

Fishing Village Access Roads and Nizampatnam Water Supply (Rs '000)

USS ' 000 Visakhapatnam District Local Foreign Total Equivalent

1. Chintapalli to Tammayyapalem 2,440 - 2,440 283.7 2. Konada to Kopperla and Thippavalasa 3,340 - 3,340 388.4 3. Gudiwada to Annavaram and Pedanagamayyapale 1,216 - 1,216 141.4 4. Vadacheepurupalli to Thikkavanipalem and Mutyalammapalem 1,008 - 1,008 117.2 5. Vadacheepurupalli to Vadapalem and Tanthadi 308 - 308 35.8 6. Pudimadaka to Kotbapatnam 2,250 - 2,250 261.6 7. Revulpolavaramto Bangarammapalem 750 - 750 87.2 8. Edatam to Palamanupeta and Venkatanagaram - 1.003 116.6 Subtotal Base Cost 12,315 - 12,315 1,431.9 Physical Contingencies (10%) 1,232 - .1,232 143.3 Subtotal Visakhapatnam 13,547 - 13,547 1,575.2

East Godavari District

1. Addaripeta to Vakalapudi 7,750 - 7,750 901.1 2. Vemavaram to Addaripeta 300 - 300 34.9 3. Vemavaram to Yerraipeta 300 - 300 34.9 4. Edatam to Vemavaram 300 - 300 34.9 5. Annavaram t')Danaipeta 350 - 350 40.7 Subtotal Base Cost 9,000 - 9,000 1,046.5 Physical Contingencies (10%) 900 - 900 104.7 Subtotal Fast Godavari 9,900 - 9,900 1,151.2

Guntur Distrizt 1/

1. Tummala to Gangadipalem 1,240 - 1,240 144.2 2. Gangadipalem to Lankevanidibba 2,300 - 2,300 267.4 3. Chandramoulipuram to Mollagunta 428 - 428 49.8 4. Kothapalem to Mollagunta 1,200 - 1,200 139.5 5. Kotliapalemto Gondisamudram 860 - 860 100.0 6. New Bridge to the Beach 355 - 355 41.3 7. Mundredu to Chlintarevu 355 - 355 41.3 8. Palarevu to Nizampatnam 900 - 900 104.6 9. Muthaipalem to Kothavodarevu 1,610 - 1.610 187.2 Subtotal Base Cost 9,248 - 9,248 1,075.3 Physical Contingencies (10%) 925 - 925 107.6 Subtotal Guntur 10,173 - 10,173 1,182.9

NlzarnpatnamWater Supply

Civil Works 280 - 280 32.6 Equipment 205 - 205 23.8 Subtotal 485 - 485 56.4 Physical Contingencies (St) 15 - 15 1.7 Subtotal Water Supply 500 - 500 58.1

Base Cost Estimate

Civil Works 30,843 - 30,843 3,586.3 Equipment 205 - 205 23.8 Total Base Cost 31,048 - 31,048 3,610.1 Physical Contingencies 3,072 - 3,072 357.3 Total with Contingencies 34,120 - 34,120 3,967.4

1/ Includes Rs 20,000 per km for black topping.

ASPAD February 1978 ANNEX 3 Table 6 Page 2 of 2 INDIA

ANDHRAPRADESH FISHERIES PROJECT

Fishing Village Access Roads

- - Length - - - - Villages/ Bast Cust Total New Improved Landing Estimate Visakhapatnam District - - - - ks - -… - - - Centers Beneficiaries Rs '000 1. Chintapalli to Tammay-yapalem 21 11 10 7 3,648 2,440 2. Konada to Tippavalasa 27 17 10 4 1,985 3,340 3. Guidiwadato Annavaram and redanagamayyapale 10 6 4 4 2,342 1,216 4. Vadacheepurupalli to Thikkavanipalem and 7 7 - 4 1,360 1,008 14utyalammapalem S. Vadacheepurupalli to Vadapalem-Tanthadi 3 1 2 1 620 308 6. Puidimadakato Kothapatnam 15 15 - 6 4,216 2,250 7. Re.vupolavaramto Bangarammapalem 5 5 - 1 3,224 750 8. Elatam to Palamanupeta and Venkatanagaram 5 5 5 5 9L,003 Sub-total 98 67 31 32 19,786 12,315

East Godavari District 1. Addaripeta to Vakalapudi 45 45 - 37 33,387 7,750 2. Vemavaram to Addaripeta 2 2 - 1 820 300 3. Vemavaram to Yerraipeta 1/ 2 2 - - - 300 4. Edatam to Vemavaram 1/ 6 - 6 - - 300 5. Annavaram to Danaipeta 14 - 14 4 _619 350 Sub-total 69 49 20 41 34,826 9,000

Guntur District 2/ 1. Tummala to Gangadipalen 7 - 7 7 5.454 1,240 2. Cangadipalem to Lanikevanidibba 13 13 - 7 2.121 2,300 3. Chandramoulipuramto Mollagunta 3 3 - 3 3,424 428 4. Kothapalem to Mollagutnta 5 5 - 2 4,848 1,200 5. Kothapalem to Gondisamudram 3 3 - 4 3,485 860 6. Hew Bridge to the Beach 2 2 - 2 667 355 7. F;undreduto Chintarevu 2 2 - 1 242 355 8. Falarevu to Nizampatrnam 5 5 - 1 242 900 9. ?[uthaipalemto Kothavodarevu 8 8 - 2 2.121 1,610 Sub-total 48 41 7 29 22,604 9,248

Total Roads 215 157 58 102 77,216 30,563

1/ Lirkkroads population aindvillages included under other roads.

ASPAD December 1977 ANNEX 3 Table 7

INDIA

ANDHRA PRADESH FISHERIES PROJECT

Estimated Unit and Base Costs as of September 1977

Fishing Vessels (Rs '000)

US$ lOm MYVs Local Total Equivalent

Hull 58.0 58.0 6.7 Engine 102.0 102.0 11.9 Equipment 5.0 5.0 0.6 Gear 4.0 4.0 0.4 Unit Cost per Vessel 169.0 169.0 19.6 Total 300 Vessels 50,700.0 50,700.0 5,895.3

9m MEVs

Hull 35.0 35.0 4.1 Engine 65.0 65.0 7.6 Equipment 4.5 4.5 0.5 Gear 4.0 4.0 0.4 Unit Cost per Vessel 108.5 108.5 12.6 Total 60 Vessels 6,510.0 6,510.0 757.0

12m Non-MFVs

Hull 12.0 12.0 1.4 Gear 24.0 24.0 2.8 Unit Cost per Vessel 36.0 36.0 4.2 Total 60 Vessels 2,160.0 2,160.0 251.2

Base Cost Estimate

Total All Vessels 59,370.0 59,370.0 6,903.5

ASPAD April 1978 ANNEX3 INDIA Table 8

ANDHRA PRADESH FISHERIES PROJECT

Estimated Unit and Base Costs as of September 1977

Seafood Processing Facilities (Rs '000)

US$ '000 Local Foreign Total Equivalent Visakhapatnan Building 1/ 1,854 - 1,854 215.6 Freezers 2i/ 1,890 - 1,890 219.8 Ice Making Machine 3/ 2,240 - 2,240 260.4 Ice Crushing Units (2) 20 - 20 2.3 Ice Storage Machine 4/ 128 - 128 14.9 Cold Storage Machine 4/ 128 - 128 14.9 Frozen Storage Machine 5/ 1,000 - 1,000 116.3 Standby Diesel Generators (2) 6/ 200 - 200 23.2 Shrimp Grader 7/ - 30 30 3.5 Processing Room Equipment 8/ 145 - 145 16.9 Office Equipment 9/ 20 - 20 2.3 Subtotal Base Cost 7,625 30 7,655 890.1 Physical Contingencies (10%) 186 - 186 21.1 Total Unit Cost 7,811 30 7,841 911.6

Nizampatnam Building 1/ 279 - 279 32.5 Freezer 2/ 290 - 290 33.7 Ice Making Machine 3/ 650 - 650 75.6 Ice Crushing t'nit 10 - 10 1.2 Ice and Cold Storage Machine 4/ 51 - 51 5.9 Frozen Storage Machine 5/ 48 - 48 5.6 Standby Diesel Generator 6/ 92 - 92 10.7 Processing Room Equipment 8/ 58 - 58 6.7 Office Equipment 9/ 7 - 7 0.8 Subtotal Base Cost 1,485 - 1,485 172.7 Physical Contingencies (10%) 28 - 28 3.3 Total Unit Cost 1.513 - 1,513 176.0

Insulated Trucks Visakhapatnam - 3 Units 525 - 525 61.1 Nizampatnam - 1 Unit 175 - 175 20.3 Subtotal 700 - 700 81.4

Base Cost Estimate Civil Works 2,133 - 2,133 248.0 Equipment 7,677 30 7,707 896.2 Total Base Cost 9,810 30 9,840 1,144.2 Physical Contingencies 213 - 213 24.8 Total with Contingencies 10,023 30 10,053 1,169.0

1/ Buildings costed at Rs 600 per m . Equipment cost includes installation. 21 Six plate freezer units of 480 kg charging capacity each for Visakhapatnam and one plate freezer of 250 kg charging capacity for Nizampatnam, with complete equipment including compressors and piping. Freezing temperature to be less than -35°C. 3/ Complete Iblockice-making units including ice cans, hoists and brine tank insulation, capacity 80 tons per day at Visakhapatnam and 25 at Nizampatnam. 4/ Complete iunitsincluding insulation, for air blast cold storage system, capacity 100 tons at Visakhapatnam and 50 tons at Nizampatnam at '5°C. 5/ Complete uanitsincluding insulation for air blast frozen storage system, capacity 600 tons at Visakhapatnam and 20 tons at Nizampatnam at less than -20C. 6/ Wiring from harbor transformer included. 7/ One unit, grading capacity 20 tons per day. 8/ Includes scales, wheel barrows, platform trollies, processing tables and trays. 9/ Includes office furniture, two typewriters and a duplicating machine. 10/ Insulated truck holding five tons of frozen cargo for 12 hours.

ASPAD April 1978 ANNEX 4 Table 1

INDIA

ANDHRA PRADESH FISHERIES PROJECT

Cash Flow Projections

23m Shrimp Trawler 1/ (Rs '000)

------Years ------1 2-6 7-9 10 I. Cash Inflow Cross Sales 2/ (1) 2,302.0 3,070.0 3,070.0 3,070.0 Borrower's Contribution: 20% of (4) 900.0 - - - Loan Amount: 80% of (4) 3.600.0 - -

Total Cash Inflow (2) 6,802.0 3,070.0 3,070.0 3,070.0

II. Cash Outflow Operating Costs Wages, Allowances, Crew Insurance 3/ 331.3 331.3 Fuel, Lubricants, Grease 4/ 495.4 495.4 Fish Boxes and Water 3.0 3.0 Maintenance 5/ 339.0 339.0 Vessel Insurance 6/ 112.5 112.5 Port Fees 61.0 61.0 Commission of Sales 7/ 23.0 30.7 Miscellaneous 69.0 69.0 Interest on Working Capital 8/ 24.4 24.5 Total Operating Costs 1,458.3 1,466.1 1,466.1 1,466.1 Estimated Private Income Tax 78.4 265.2 265.2 265.2 Operating Costs After Taxes (3) 1,536.7 1,731.3 1,731.3 1,731.3 Investment Cost (4) 4,500.0 - - (450.0) Debt Service 9/ 396.2 974.6 - -

Total Outflow (5) 6,432.9 2,705.9 1,731.3 1,281.3

III. Net Cash Flow: (2) - (5) (6) 369.1 364.1 1,338.7 1,788.7

IV. Financial Benefit-Cost Benefit (1) (7) 2,302.0 3,070.0 3,070.0 3,070.0 Cost (3) + (4) (8) 6,036.7 1,731.3 1,731.3 1,281.3 Net Benefit (7) - (8) (9) (3,734.7) 1,338.7 1,338.7 1,788.7

V. Financial Rate of Return: 33% Rate of Return on Equity: 77%

1/ Borrower's contribution is 20% of investment cost. General specifications and drawings are given in Annex 3, Table 2 and Chart 18182. Trawlers are not financed under the project. 2/ First year gross sales are 75% of full development gross sales, which assume annual live weight landings of 100 tons for shrimp and 120 tons for fish; catch is sold at average ex-vessel prices of Rs 29.50/kg for shrimp (frozen) and Rs 1.00/kg for fish. 3/ Annual wage rates are Rs 72,000 for the 12-man crew, Rs 30,000 for the captain, Rs 18,000 for the mate and Rs 24,000 for the engineer; estimate includes an additional Rs 187,000 for food, shore labor, minor maintenance and maintenance supervision, and life insurance. 4/ Diesel fuel use is 76 1/hr for 15 hrs/day for 280 days/yr, and cost is Rs 1.10/1; engine oil use is 3% of fuel use at Rs 10/1, and grease is 2% of fuel use at Rs 8/kg. 5/ Includes repairs to engine (8%) for Rs 144,000, hull (5%) for Rs 125,000 and gear (35%) for Rs 70,000. 6/ Annual insurance premiums are 3.25% of investment cost. 7/ Commission to fish trader is 1% of gross sales. 8/ The interest rate is 17% on working capital requirements estimated at 10% of operating costs. 9/ Interest only is paid on the loan during the first year; loan principle and interest are amortized in equal annual payments during years 2 to 6; interest rate on the loan is 11%.

ASPAD April 1978 ANNEX 4 Table 2 INDIA

ANDHRAPRADESH FISHERIES PROJECT

Cash Flow Prolections

lOm MFV - Private 1/ (Rs '000)

------Years ------1 2-7 8-9 10 I. Cash Inflow Gross Sales 2/ (1) 129.4 172.5 172.5 172.5 Borrower's Contribution: 15% of (4) 25.3 - - - Loan Amount: 85% of (4) 143.7 - -

Total Cash Inflow (2) 298.4 172.5 172.5 172.5

II. Cash Outflow Operating Costs Wages, Allowances, Crew Insurance 3/ 42.4 48.9 Fuel, Lubricants, Grease 4/ 32.7 32.7 Ice 5/ 4.0 5.3 Fish Boxes and Water 0.5 0.5 Maintenance 6/ 17.9 17.9 Vessel Insurance 7/ 5.5 5.5 Port Fees 6.5 6.5 Commission on Sales 8/ 1.3 1.7 Miscellaneous 0.4 0.4 Interest of Working Capital 9/ 1.9 2.0 Total Operating Costs (3) 113.1 121.4 121.4 121.4 Investment Coist (4) 169.0 - - (16.9) Debt Service 10/ 15.8 34.0 - _

Total Cash Outflow (5) 297.9 155.4 121.4 104.5

III. Net Cash Flow (2) - (5) (6) 0.5 17.1 51.1 68.0

IV. Financial Benefit-Cost Benefit (1) (7) 129.4 172.5 172.5 172.5 Cost (3) + (4) (8) 282.1 121.4 121.4 104.5 Net Benefit (7) - (8) (9) (152.7) 51.1 51.1 68.0

V. Financial Rate of Return: 31% Rate of Return on Equity: 73%

1/ Borrower's contribution is 15%. General specifications and.drawings are given in Annex 3, Table 2 and Chart 18180. 2 'Firstyear gross sales are 75% full development gross sales, which assume live weight landings of 6.25 tons of shrimp and 46.75 tons of fish; catch is sold at average ex-vessel prices of Rs 22/kg for shrimp and Rs 0.75/kg for fish in boxes of about 30 kg. 3/ :Basicwages for crew are 12% of gross sales total for the crew of 4, plus 3% for the captain; estimate includes an additional Rs 23,000 for food, shore labor, minor maintenance and mainten- sance supervision and life insurance. 4/ Diesel fuel use is 8 1/hr for 11 hrs/day for 250 days/yr, and cost is Rs 1.28/1; 1 liter of ,engineoil at Rs 10/1 and 1 kg of grease at Rs 8/kg is required per fishing day. 5/ Based on 1 kg of ice costing Rs 0.10/kg for each kg of catch. 6/ 'icludes repairs to engine for Rs 10,200, hull for Rs 4,060 and gear for 3,600. 7/ Annual insurance premiums are 3.25% of investment cost. 8/ Commission to fish trader is 1% of gross sales. 9/ rhe interest rate is 17% on working capital requirements estimated at 10% of operating costs. 10/ Interest only is paid on the loan during the first year; loan principle and interest are zmortized in equal, annual payments during years 2 to 7; interest rate on the loan is 11%.

ASPAD December 1977 ANNEX 4 Table 3

INDIA

ANDHRA PRADESH FISHERIES PROJECT

Cash Flow Projections

iOm MFV - Cooperative 1/ (Rs '000)

------Years ------1 2-7 8-9 10 I. Cash Inflow Gross Sales 2/ (1) 129.4 172.5 172.5 172.5 Borrower's Contribution: 5% of (4) 8.4 - - - Loan Amount: 95% of (4) 160.6 - - -

Total Cash Inflow (2) 298.4 172.5 172.5 172.5 II. Cash Outflow Operating Costs Wages, Allowances, Crew Insurance 3/ 42.4 48.9 Fuel, Lubricants, Grease 4/ 32.7 32.7 Ice 5/ 4.0 5.3 Fish Boxes and Water 0.5 0.5 Maintenance 6/ 17.9 17.9 Vessel Insurance 7/ 5.5 5.5 Port Fees 6.5 6.5 Commission on Sales 8/ 1.3 1.7 Miscellaneous 0.4 0.4 Interest on Working Capital 1.9 2.0 _ Total Operating Costs (3) 113.1 121.4 121.4 121.4 Investment Cost (4) 169.0 - - (16.9) Debt Service 10/ 17.6 38.0 - -

Total Cash Outflow (5) 299.7 159.4 121.4 104.5

III. Net Cash Flow (2) - (5) (6) (1-3) 13.1 51.1 68.0

IV. Financial Benefit-Cost Benefit (1) (7) 129.4 172.5 172.5 172.5 Cost (3) + (4) (8) 282.1 121.4 121.4 104.5 Net Benefit (7) - (8) (9) (152.7) 51.1 51.1 68.0

V. Financial Rate of Return: 31% Rate of Return on Equity: over 100%

1/ Borrower's contribution is 5%. General specifications and drawings are given in Annex 3, Table 2 and Chart 18180. 2/ First year gross sales are 75% full development gross sales, which assume live weight landings of 6.25 tons of shrimp and 46.75 tons of fish; catch is sold at average ex-vessel prices of Rs 22/kg for shrimp and Rs 0.75/kg for fish in boxes of about 30 kg. 3/ Basic wages for crew are 12% of gross sales total for the crew of 4, plus 3% for the captain; estimate includes an additional Rs 23,000 for food, shore labor, minor maintenance and maintenance supervision and life insurance. 4/ Diesel fuel use is 8 1/hr for 11 hrs/day for 250 days/yr, and cost is Rs 1.28/1; 1 liter of engine oil at Rs 10/1 and 1 kg of grease at Rs 8/kg is required per fishing day. 5/ Based on 1 kg of ice costing Rs 0.10/kg for each kg of catch. 6/ Includes repairs to engine for Rs 10,200, hull for Rs 4,060 and gear for 3,600. 7/ Annual insurance premiums are 3.25% of investment cost. 8/ Commission to fish trader is 1% of gross sales. 9/ The interest rate is 17% on working capital requirements estimated at 10% of operating costs. 10/ Interest only is paid on the loan during the first year; loan principle and interest are amortized in equal, annual payments during years 2 to 7; interest rate on the loan is 11%.

ASPAD December 1977 ANNEX 4 Table 4

INDIA

ANDHRAPRADESII FISHERIES PROJECT

Cash Flow Projections

9m MFV- Private I/ (Rs '000)

… . . - . . Years ------1 2-7 8-9 10 I. Cash Inflow Gross Sales 2/ (1) 83.7 111.6 111.6 111.6 Borrower's Contribution: 15% of (4) 16.3 - - - Loan Amount: 85% of (4) 92.2 - - -

Total Cash Inflow (2) 192.2 111.6 111.6 111.6

II. Cash Outflow Operating Costs Wages, Allowances, Crew Insurance 3/ 32.6 36.7 Fuel 1 Lubricants, Grease 4/ . 16.7 16.7 Ice 5/ 2.6 3.6 Fish Boxes and Water 0.4 0.4 Maintenance 6/ 10.4 10.4 Vessel Insurance 7/ 3.5 3.5 fort Fees 2.4 2.4 Commission on Sales 8/ 0.8 1.1 Miscellaneous 0.5 0.5 Interest on Working Capital 9/ 1.2 1.3 TotaJl Operating Costs (3) 71.1 76.6 76.6 76.6 Investment Cost (4) 108.5 - - (10.9) Debt Service lO/ 10.1 21.8

Total Cash Outflow (5) 189.7 98.4 76.6 65.7

III. ]Yet Cash Flow: (2) - (5) (6) 2.5 13.2 35.0 45.9

IV. Financial Benefit-Cost Benefit (1) (7) 83.7 111.6 111.6 111.6 Cost (3) + (4) (8) 179.6 76.6 76.6 65.7 Net Benefit (7) - (8) (9) (95.9) 35.0 35.0 45.9

V. Financial Rate of Return: 34% Rate of Return on Equity: 98%

1/ 3orrower's contribution is 15%. General specifications and drawings are given in Annex 3, Table 2 and Chart 18181. 2/ First year gross sales are 75% of full development gross sales, which assume annual live weight 'Landings of 4 tons of shrimp and 31.5 tons of fish; catch is sold at average ex-vessel prices of Rs 22/kg for shrimp and Rs 0.75/kg for fish in boxes of about 30 kg. 3/ Basic wages are 12% of gross sales total for the 4 crew members, plus 3% for the captain; estimate includes an additional Rs 20,000 for shore labor, minor maintenance and maintenance supervision and life insurance. 4/ Diesel fueL use is 6.75 1/hr for 10 hrs/day for 160 days/yr, and cost is Rs 1.28/1; 1 liter of engine oil at Rs 10/1 and 1 kg of grease at Rs 8/kg are required per fishing day. 5/ Based on 1 kg of ice costing Rs 0.10/kg for each kg of catch. 6/ Includes repairs to engine for Rs 4,550, hull for Rs 2,450 and gear for Rs 3,400. 7/ Annua-l insurance premiums are 3.25% of investment cost. 8/ Commission to fish trader is 1% of gross sales. 9/ The interest rate is 17% on working capital requirement estimated at 10% of operating costs. 10/ :Interest only is lpaid on the loan during the first year; loan principle and interest are amortized :Ln equal annual payments during years 2 to 7; interest rate on the loan is 11%.

JLSPAD December 1977 ANNEX 4 Table 5 INDIA

ANDU1RAPRADESII FISHERIES PROJECT

Cash Flow Projections

9m MFV - Cooperative 1/ (Rs '000)

… ------Years ------1 2-7 8-9 10 I. Cash Inflow Gross Sales 2/ (1) 83.7 111.6 111.6 111.6 Borrower's Contribution: 5% of (4) 5.4 - - - Loan Amount: 95% of (4) 103.1 - - -

Total Cash Inflow (2) 192.2 111.6 111.6 111.6

II. Cash Outflow Operating Costs Wages, Allowances, Crew Insurance 3/ 32.6 36.7 Fuel, Lubricants, Grease 4/ 16.7 16.7 Ice 5/ 2.6 3.6 Fish Boxes and Water 0.4 0.4 Maintenance 6/ 10.4 10.4 Vessel Insurance 7/ 3.5 3.5 Port Fees 2.4 2.4 Commission on Sales 8/ 0.8 0.8 Miscellaneous 0.5 0.5 Interest on Working Capital 9/ 1.2 1.3 Total Operating Costs (3) 71.1 76.6 76.6 76.6 Investment Cost (4) 108.5 - - (10.9) Debt Service 10/ 11.3 24.4 - -

Total Cash Outflow (5) 190.9 101.0 76.6 65.7

III. Net Cash Flow: (2) - (5) (6) 1.3 10.6 35.0 45.9 IV. Financial Benefit-Cost Benefit (1) (7) 83.7 111.6 111.6 111.6 Cost (3) + (4) (8) 179.6 76.6 76.6 65.7 Net Benefit (7) - (8) (9) (95.9) 35.0 35.0 45.9

V. Financial Rate of REturn: 34% Rate of Return on Equity: over 100%

1/ Borrower's contribution is 5%. General specifications and drawings are given in Annex 3, Table 2 and Chart 18181. 2/ First year gross sales are 75% of full development gross sales, which assume annual live weight landings of 4 tons of shrimp and 31.5 tons of fish; catch is sold at average ex-vessel prices of Rs 22/kg for shrimp and Rs 0.75/kg for fish in boxes of about 30 kg. 3/ Basic wages are 12% of gross sales total for the 4 crew members, plus 3% for the captain; estimate includes an additional Rs 20,000 for shore labor, minor maintenance and maintenance supervision and life insurance. 4/ Diesel fuel use is 6.75 1/hr for 10 hrs/day for 160 days/yr, and cost is Rs 1.28/1; 1 liter of engine oil at Rs 10/1 and 1 kg of grease at Rs B/kg are required per fishing day. 5/ Based on 1 kg of ice costing Rs 0.10/kg for each kg of catch. 6/ Includes repairs for Rs 4,550, hull for Rs 2,45D and gear for Rs 3,400. 7/ Annual insurance premiums are 3.25% of investment cost. 8/ Commission to fish trader is 1% of gross sales. 9/ The interest rate is 17% on working capital requirement estimated at 10% of operating costs. 10/ Interest only is paid on the loan during the first year; loan principle and interest are amortized in equal annual payments during years 2 to 7; interest rate on the loan is 11%.

ASPAD December 1977 ANNEX4 Table 6

INDIA

ANDHRA PRADESH FISHERIES PROJECT

Cash Flow Projections

12m Non-MFV - Private 1/ (Rs '000)

------Years ------1 2-5 6-9 10 I. Cash Inflow Gross Sales 2/ (1) 23.8 31.8 31.8 31.8 Borrower's Contribution: 15% of (4) 5.4 - - - Loan Amount: 85% of (4) 30.6 - -

Total Cash Inflow (2) 59.8 31.8 31.8 31.8

II. Cash Outflow Operating Costs Wages, Allowince, Crew Insurance 3/' 9.5 11.5 Fish Boxes and Water 0.1 0.1 Maintenance 4/ 6.5 6.5 Vessel Insurance 5/ 1.2 1.2 Port Fees 0.1 0.1 Commission on1Sales 6/ 0.2 0.3 Miscellaneous 0.3 0.3 Interest on Working Capital 7/ 0.3 0.3 _ Total Operating Costs (3) 18.2 20.3 20.3 20.3 Investment Cost (4) 36.0 - - (3.6) Debt Service 8/ 3.3 9.8 - -

Total Cash Outflow (5) 57.5 30.1 20.3 16.7

III. Net Cash Flow: (2) - (5) (6) 2.3 1.7 11.5 15.1

IV. Financial Benefil-Cost Benefit (1) (7) 23.8 31.8 31.8 31.8 Cost (3) + (4) (8) .54.2 20.3 20.3 16.7 Net Benefit (7) - (8) (9) (30.4) 11.5 11.5 15.1

V. Financial Rate of Return: 36% Rate of Return on Equity: 82%

1/ Borrower's contrJibutionis 15% of investment cost. General specifications and drawings are given in Annex 3, Table 2 and Chart 18183. 2/ First year gross sales are 75% of full development gross sales, which assume annual catch landings of 30 tons of fish sold ex-vessel for an average price of Rs 1.06/kg in boxes of about 30 kg. 3/ Basic crew wages are 25% of gross sales; owner-operator pays food costs of Rs 2/man/day for a crew of 6 and captain for 250 days at sea. 4/ Annual cost of repairs is Rs 480 for hull and Rs 6,000 for gear. 5/ Annual insurance premiums are 3.25% of investment cost. 6/ Commission to fish trader is 1% of gross sales. 7/ Interest rate is 17% on working capital requirement estimated at 10% of operating costs. 8/ Interest only is paid on the loan during the first year; loan principle and interest are amortized in equal annual payments during years 2 to 5; interest rate on the loan is 11%.

ASPAD December 1977 ANNEX 4 Table 7

INDIA

ANDHRA PRADESH FISHERIES PROJECT

Cash Flow Projections

12m Non-MFV -Cooperative 11 (Rs '000) … --- Years …--- 1 2-5 6-9 10 I. Cash Inflow Gross Sales 2/ (1) 23.8 31.8 31.8 31.8 Borrower's Contribution: 5% of (4) 1.8 - - - Loan Amount: 95% of (4) 34.2 - - -

Total Cash Inflow (2) 59.8 31.8 31.8 31.8

II. Cash Outflow Operating Costs Wages, Allowances, Crew Insurance-3/ 9.5 11.5 Fish Boxes and Water 0.1 0.1 Maintenance 4/ 6.5 6.5 Vessel Insurance 5/ 1.2 1.2 Port Fees 0.1 0.1 Commission on Sales 6/ 0.2 0.3 Miscellaneous 0.3 0.3 Interest on Working Capital 7/ 0.3 0.3 Total Operating Cost (3) 18.2 20.3 20.3 20.3 InvestmentCost (4) 36.0 - - (3.6) Debt Service 8/ 3.7 11.0 - -

Total Cash Outflow (5) 57.9 31.2 20.3 16.7

III. Net Cash Flow (2) - (5) (6) 1.9 0.6 11.5 15.1

IV. Financial Benefit-Cost Benefit (1) (7) 23.8 31.8 31.8 31.8 Cost (3) + (4) (8) 54.2 20.3 20.3 16.7 Net Benefit (7) - (8) (9) (30.4) 11.5 11.5 15.1

V. Financial Rate of Recurn: 36% Rate of Return on Equity: over 100%

1/ Borrower's contribution is 5% of investment cost. General specifications and drawings are given in Annex 3, Table 2 and Chart 18183. 2/ First year gross sales are 75% of full development gross sales, which assume annual catch landings of 30 tons of fish sold ex-vessel for an average price of Rs 1.06/kg in boxes of about 30 kg. 3/ Basic crew wages are 25% of gross sales; owner-operator pays food costs of Rs 2/man/day for a crew of 6 and captain for 250 days at sea. 4/ Annual cost of repairs is Rs 480 for hull and Rs 6,000 for gear. 5/ Annual insurance premiums are 3.25% of investment cost. 6/ Commission to fish trader is 1% of gross sales. 7/ Interest rate is 17% on working capital requirement estimated at 10% of operating costs. 8/ Interest only is paid on the loan during the first year; loan principle and interest are amortized in equal annual payments during years 2 to 5; interest rate on the loan is 11%.

ASPAD December 1977 A;i.i'.i 4 1db..i; 8i

ANIDIRA PRADESHI 1 lil.l lR.13PROJIECT

Cnsh Flow Pro ctft,ns

Vigakimpatnam Senfood Procc2 dog Plant 1/ (Rs '000) ------Years ------…- - 1 2 3 4-10 11-14 15 1. Cash) Infilc Gross S,les2/ (1) *84,260.0 ]06,207.0 141,364.0 151,231.0 151,231.0 151,231.0 Borrower's Contribtitlon: 20% of (4) 1,531.0 - - - - Loan Aimount: 80% of (4) 6,124.0

Total Cash Inflow (2) 91,915.0 106,207.0 141,364.0 151,231.0 151,231.0 151,231.0

II. Cash Outflow Operating Costs Cost of Raw Material 3/ 71,844.0 91,235.0 122,357.0 131,125.0 Salaries 4/ 272.4 272.4 272.4 272.4 Wages 5/ 216.5 271:2 357.9 382.0 Electricity 6/ 612.0 677.7 711.3 799.2 Water 7/ 33.0 41.4 54.6 58.3 Ice Consumption 8/ 249.8 312.8 412.7 440.5 Packing Materials 9/ 1,048.7 1,332.1 1,744.4 1,856.7 Miaintenance, Operation 10/ 92.0 110.6 137.5 145.4 Truck Transportation Charge 11/ 396.0 396.0 396.0 396.0 Export Inspection Charge 12/ 81.1 103.0 135.2 144.6 Instarance of Property 13/ 38.3 38.3 38.3 38.3 Insurance of Products 14/ 40.0 50.8 66.5 71.1 Municipal Tax 15/ 37.1 37.1 37.1 37.1 Market Production 200.0 200.0 200.0 200.0 Office Expenses 16/ 68.8 68.8 68.8 68.8 interest on Working Capital 17/ 1,278.9 1,617.5 2,158.B 2,312.7 Estimated Corporate Income Tax 3,471.0 4,401.0 5,893.0 6,288.0 Total Operating Cost (3) 79,979.6 101,165.7 135,041.54 "i635 I 14,36.44,3C. Investment Cost 18/ (4) . 7;655.0 - - - - (2,551.7) Debt Service 19/ 673.6 1,106.0 1,106.0 1,106.0 -

Total Cash Outflow (5) 88,608.2 102,271.7 136,147.4 145,742.1 144,636.1 142,084.4 III. Financial Benefit-Cost Benefit (1) (6) 84,260.0 106,207.0 141,364.0 151,231.0 151,231.0 151,231.0 Cost (3) + (4) (7) 87,634.6 101,165.7 135,041.4 144,636.1 144,636.1 142,084.4 Met Benefit (6) - (7) (8) (3,374.6) 5,041.3 6,332.6 6,594.9 6,594.9 9,146.6

IV. FinancialRate of Return: over 100% Rate of Return on Equity: over 100%

1/ Plant capacity is 23 tons per day for plate freezers, 600 tons of frozen storage, 80 tons per day of ice, 100 tons of ice storage and 100 tons of cold storage. 2/ Annual sales starting in 1981 would be based on exports to Japan of shrimp procured as raw material from project vessels at Visakhapatnam and from villages, plus sale of ice for Rs 2 million; FOBexport prices to Japan for processed shrimp and yields of finished product from raw materials would be Rs 80/kg and 60% for Grade 1, Rs 55/kg and 50% for Grade 2 and Rs 27/kg and 40% for Grade 3. 3/ Starting in 1991, raw material would be procured for the new plant from the 23m trawlers and 10n MFVs based on their projected deployment schedule under the projectwith first year catch for each new boat at 75% of full developmenc levels, along with 1,000 tons annually from villages; prices paid are assumed to be Rs 40/kg for Grade 1, Rs 25/kg for Grade 2 and Rs 5 for Grade 3; catch composition is expected to be 20% Grade 1, 50% Grade 2 and 30% Grade 3 for 1Oi MFVs and villages, and 30% Grade 1 and 70% Grade 2 for 23m trawlers for shrimp catch only. 4/ Salariea of 44 permanent employees. 5/ Wages of 251 daily workers needed at full development, including processing girls, are prorated duiring the first three years according to capacity utilizacion (procurement). 6/ Electric power cost is based on full development requirements of 3,330,000 kwh at Rs 0.24/kwh, prorated according to capacity utilization except for power required for ice naking. 7/ Water cost is bas,-d on full development requireaents of 46,640 ki at a cost of Rs 1.25/kl, prorated according to capacity utilization except for water required for ice making. 8/ Processing and overnight storing of shrimp in the plant requires 4,405 tons of ice per year at full development, wbich is prorated according to capacity utiliZaLion. 9/ Master carton of 2' log conitainis 10 inner cartonts of 2 kg net weight each; cost of packing includes master cartons, inner cartons, sheets, tapes, staples and grading slips. 10/ Includes co-prssor -d refrige-rant, salt for brine and nachinery repairs. 11/ TrAnsnortation rharvp- at Rs 400 Per day and 310 davq per trrick for 3 insulated trucks. 12/ Rs 60/tons of prodtict. 13/ Annual premium is D).5% of total investment amount. 14/ Anntial premium is 0.05% for shrimp sales valud. ff/ Tax rate is 2% of building coat. 16/ Includes coommunications charges, stationery and u,,iforms of workers. 17/ Interest rats, is 17% ogi vworking capital whicih is estimated 10% of operating coats. 18/ See Aniex 5, table 19/ Interest only at I1t7 on the loan is, p,id during year 1, with the prin,ciple an,d interest to be amortized in years 2 to 10 in equal an: 1 payn,l ts.

ASeAD December1977 ANIV,X 4 Table 9

TNDIA

ANDIIRAPRADIES'S FISIIIERlS PROJECT

Cash Flow Prj!_Etl on

Nizampatnam Seafood Processing Rlant 1/ (RE '000)…Ya ------Years ------1 2 3-10 11-14 15 I. Casb Inflow Gross Sales 2/ (1) 6,856.7 8,933.9 9,453.4 9,453.4 9,453.4 Borrower's Contribution: 20X of (4) 296.9 - - - Loan Amount: 80% of (4) 1,187.6f

Total Cash Inflow (2) 8,341.2 8,933.9 9,453.4 9,453.4 9,453.4

II. Cash Outflow Operating Costs Cost of Raw Materials 3/ 5,280.0 7,040.0 7,480.0 Salaries 4/ 138.0 138.0 138.0 Wages 5/ 51.8 69.4 73.5 Electricity 6/ 108.5 119.4 124.1 Water 7/ 9.0 9.6 9.7 Ice Consumption 8/ 35.5 47.3 50.3 Packing Materials 9/ 115.4 154.0 170.7 Maintenance, Operation 10/ 17.9 22.3 24.2 Truck Transportation Charge 11/ 132.0 132.0 132.0 Export Inspection Charge 121 6.8 9.0 10.0 Insurance of Property 13/ 7.4 7.4 7.4 Insurance of Products 14/ 3.1 4.1 4.5 Municipal Tax 15/ 5.5 5.5 5.5 Market Promotion 50.0 50.0 50.0 Office Expenses 16/ 25.7 25.7 25.7 Interest on Working Capital 17/ 103.4 135.4 143.5 Estimated Corporate Income 311.6 435.8 460.9 _ Total Operating Costs (3) 6,401.6 8,402.7 8,907.7 8,907.7 8,907.7 Investment Cost 18/ (4) 1,484.5 - - - (93.0) Debt Service 19/ 130.6 214.5 214.5

Total Cash Outflow (5) 8,015.1 8,617.2 9,122.2 8,907.7 8,814.7

III. Financial Benefit-Cost Benefit (1) (6) 6,586.7 8,933.9 9,453.4 9,453.4 9,453.4 Cost (3) + (4) (7) 7,884.5 8,402.7 8,907.7 8,907.7 8,814.7 Net Benefit (6) - (7) (8) (1,027.8) S3l.2 545.7 545.7 638.7

IV. Finiancial Rate of Return: 531 Rate of Return on Equity: over lO1

1/ Plant capacity is 1.5 tons per day for plate freezers, 20 tons of frozen storage, 25 tons of ice per day, and 50 tons of ice storage. 2/ Annual sales starting in 1982 would be based on exports (via Visakhapatnam) to Japan of shrimp procured as raw material from the 9m MFVs financed under the project at Nirampatnam, plus annual sales of ice of Rs 625,000; FOB export prices to Japan for process shrimp and yields of finished product from raw materials would be Rs 80/kg and 60% for Grade 1, Rs 55/kg and 50% for Grade 2 and Rs 27/kg and 40% for Grade 3. 3/ Starting in 1982, raw material would be procured for the plant from the 9m h'FVs based on their projected deployment schedule under the project, with the first year catch for each new boat at 75% of full development levels; prices paid are assumed to be Rs 40/kg for Grade 1, Rs 25/kg for Grade 2 and Rs 5/kg for Grade 3; catch composi.ion is expected to be about 20% for Grade 1, 50% for Grade 2 and 30% for Grade 3 for shrimp catch only. 4/ Salaries of 19 permanent employees. 5/ Wages for 66 daily workers, including processing girls, are prorated according to capacity utilization (procurement). 6/ Electric power cost is based on full development requirenents of 517,000 kwh at Rs 0.24/kwh, prorated during the firet two years according to capacity utilizAtion except for ice making. 7/ Water cost is based on full development requirenments of 7,760 kl at a cost of Rs 1.25/kl, prorated according to capacity utilization. 8/ Processing and overnight storing of shrimp in the plent requtires 503 tons of ice per year at full development, which is prorated according to capacity utilization. 9/ Master carton of 20 kg contains IU inner cartons of 2 kg niet weigiht eatch; cost of packing includes master cartons, inner carrons, sheets, tapes, staples and grading slips. 10/ lncludes compressro oil, refrigerent, salt for brinie and machinery repairs. 11/ Tranaportation charges at Rs 400 per day for 330 days for one insulated truck. 12/ Rs 60/tooof prodUCL. 13/ Antntual premitm is 0.5% of total ievestmesit amount. 14/ Annual premium is 0.05% of shrimp sales value. 15/ l'ax rate is 2% of building rost. 16/ Incldeles communicalions charges, stationery and workers' uniforms. 17/ Interest rate is 17% on workitng capital whiclh is estimated at 10;1 of operating costs. 18/ See Annex 5, taible 19/ Interest only at ll;l is paid in year 1, with the principle aind intorest to be amortized in years 2 to 10 in equal annual payinents.

ASI'AD December 1977 ANtEX 4 Table 10

INDIA

ANDHRAPRADESH FISHERIES PROJECT

Cash Flow Projections

Insulated T'rucks1/ (Rs '000)

------Years ------1 2 3-5 6 I. Cash Flow Gross Sales 2/ (1) 132.0 132.0 132.0 132.0 Borrower's Contribution: 15% of (4) 26.3 - - - Loan Anount: 85% of (4) 148.7 - - -

Total Cash Inflow (2) 307.0 132.0 132.0 132.0

II. Cash Outflow Operating Costs Wages 3/ 4.8 Fuel and Ol 4/ 23.1 Maintenance 17.0 Insurance 5/ 5.3 Tax 1.0 Miscellaneous 0.4 Interest on Working Capital 6/ 0.9 __ _ Total Operating Costs (3) 52.5 52.5 52.5 52.5 Investment Cost (4) 175.0 - - (17.5) Debt Service 7/ 86.9 86.9 - -

Total Cash Outflow (5) 314.4 139.4 52.5 35.0

III. Net Cash Flov: (2) - (5) (6) (7.4) (7.4) 79.5 97.0

IV. Financial Benefit-Cost Benefit (1) (7) 132.0 132.0 132.0 132.0 Cost (3) + (4) (8) 227.5 52.5 52.5 35.0 Net Benefit (7) - (8) (9) (95.5) 79.5 79.5 97.0

V. Financial Ra-.eof Return: 80X Rate of Return on Equity: 100S

1/ A total of 4 trucks of 5 ton load capacity each to be owned by APFC, with 3 at Visakhapatnam and 1 at Nizampatnam; trucks will be used to collect shrimp and fish from villages for APFC Visakhapatnam,and Nizampatnan processing plants and to transport frozen shrimp from Nizampatnam and Kakirada to Visakhapatnam for storage and export. 2/ Assumes income of Rs 400 per day for 330 days per year. 3/ Monthly sialaryof driver is Rs 400. 4/ Gasoline used is 0.25 1/km for 200 km/day for 330 days/yr, at a cost of Rs 1.30/1; cost of engine oil and grease totals Rs 1,650. 5/ Annual irLsurancepremiums are 3% of the investment cost. 6/ The inteiest rate is 17% on working capital, which is estimated at 10% of operating costs. 7/ Loan pritncipleand interest are amortized in equal annual payments during years 1 and 2.

ASPAD December 1977 INDIA

ANDHRAPRADESH FISHERIES PROJECT

Economic Analyses

Fishing Village Access Roads 1

Without Project / With Project Production Value Total Investment Production Value Total Net m.t. per m.t. E. Benefit cost 3 m.t. / per m.t.2/ E. Benefit E. Benefit Years (1) (2) (3)-(l)x(2) (4) (5) (6) (7)=(5)x(6)-(4) (8)=(-() Visakhapatnam Rs Rs'O0O Rs'000 Rs Rs'000 Rs'O00 1 13,557 1,210 16,404 6,034 13,557 1,210 10,370 (6,034) 2 - 13,557 1,210 16,404 6,o34 14,370 1,220 11,497 (4,907) 3 13,557 1,210 16,404 - 16,095 1,230 19,797 3,393 4 13,557 1,210 16,404 - 18,509 1,240 22,951 6,547 5 13,557 1,210 16,404 - 18,509 1,250 23,136 6,732 6-20 13,557 1,210 16,404 - 18,509 1,250 23,136 6,732

Economic Rate of Return: 42%

East Godavari 1 9,000 1,570 14,130 4,410 9,000 1,570 9,720 (4,860) 2 9,000 1,570 14,130 4,410 9,540 1,600 10,854 (3,276) 3 9,000 1,570 14,130 - lo,685 1,630 17,417 3,287 4 9,000 1,570 14,130 - 12,287 1,660 20,396 6X266 5 9,000 1,570 14,130 - 12,287 1,690 20,765 6,635 6-20 9,000 1,570 14,130 - 12,287 1,720 21,133 7,003

Economic Rate of Return: 52%

Guntur 1 3,215 1,270 4,o83 4,769 3,215 1,270 (685) (4,768) 2 3,215 1,270 4,o83 4,769 3,408 1,270 (440) (4,523) 3 3,215 1,270 4,o83 - 3,816 1,326 5,o60 977 4 3,215 1,270 4,083 - 4,389 1,354 5,942 1,859 5 3,215 1,270 4,083 - 5,047 1,382 6,975 2,892 6-20 3,215 1,270 4,083 - 5,047 1,410 7,116 3,033

Economic Rate of Return: 23%

Overall Rate of Return: 40% Annual repair and maintenance (R&M) is expected to be about 2% of investment cost, but this has been disregarded because benefits of M roads to general public are expected to far outweigh the R&M. a, 2 Based on estimates provided by the Department of Fisheries, Andhra Pradesh. m x >/ Financial cost (Annex 4, Table 3) less 2% tax. - > As a result of improved access to markets, production is expected to increase by 6% for year 2, 12% for year 3 and 15% for year 4 for all three Districts and reach plateau, except Guntur where a 15% increase is projected for year 5. J Access roads provided under the project are expected to enhance the average value per unit of fish landed because larger shares of the catch will be marketed in fresh condition instead of in salted or otherwise cured forms.

May 1978 ASPAD INDIA

ANDHR~APRADESI FISHERFIES PROJECT

EconomicAnalysis

CompositeCost/Benefit Analysis for VisakhapatnamHarbor

EconomicCosts EconomnicBenefits Harbor~/ 23mMFV %f iO MFV~/ SeafoodPlanit T/Hrtor ~/ 23m MFV iO1/ MFV~J Seafoo3dPlant 9/ Years CUL) (C2) (C3) (c4) (Bi1) (B2) (B3) -B4 ------innRs '000------

1 10,964 - 3,200 2,781 2 31,302 24,4i0 4,ooo 2,781 - 3 21,119 24,41o1 4,800 1,390 6,o69 1,065 1,575 4+ - 24,410 5,600 - 1,909 12,138 2,3,30 3,151 5 - 24,410 6,400 - 3,818 24,276 4,260 6,303 6 - 49,363 -- 5,455 36,41-4 6,390 9,454 7-15 - - - - 5,455 60,690 10,650 15,758 16 - - 3,200 - 5,455 60,690 10,650 15,758 17 - 24,410 4,000 - 5,455 60,690 10,650 15,758 18 - 24,410 4,8oo - 5,455 60,690 10,650 15,758 19 - 24,410 5,600 - 5,455 60,69o 10,650 15,758 20 (21,306) (66,756) (3,306) 5,455 60,690 l0,650 15,758

Base EconomicRate of Return 28% All CostsUp 10% 26% All Costslip 20% 24% All BenefitsDnwn 10% 26% All Benefitsflown 20% 23% Costs Up 20% BenefitsDown 20% .19%

~/Investmentsin harbor works, fishingvessels, and seafoodplant are regardedas a compositeundertaking. Costs/benefitsinvolving foreign exchange have been calculatedat a shadowrate Rs. 10.00 to US$1.00. Economic costs of investmentand economicbenefits are other financialcosts and benefitsnet of relevantduties and taxes. ~/Economiccosts derivedby deduicting2% taxes from financialcosts. '/Basedon financialcost less 5% duty on importedvessels and shadowexchange rate of Rs 10.00:US$1.00.Deploy- ment of 5 vessels each fcr years 2 to 5 and 10 vesselsfor year6. ~/Financialcosts less 5% taxes. Deploymentof 20 units for year 1, 25 for year 2, 30 year 3, 35 year 4, and 1+ofor year 5 (a total of 150). 5/Basedon financialcosts less relevanttaxes amountingto about 15% of investmentcosts. ~/Expectedrevenues of wharfageand port fees from vesselsusing the harbor. These appear as items in operatingcosts of fishingvessels. 7/ Catch is expected to achieve -full development level in year 7, and it is assumed that 60% of the full development catch will be achieved in year 6, 40%in year 5, 20% in year 4, and 10% in year 3. The economic value of the catch is derivedby applyingthe shadowexchange rate to the gross sales which are largelyex- portableshrimp (seeAnnex 5, Table 1 for Cash Flow Projections).A fleet of 30 project 23m M-FVsprojected. ~/Catchprojections and applicationof the shadowexchange rate as per 23m MFVs. See Aiinex5, Table 2 for Cash Flow Projections. A fleet of 150 lOin MFIVsprojected. 2/ Economic benefits of the Seafood Plant have been calculated by introducing the shadow exchange rate to the cost of exportable shrimp raw material as well an gross sales, and deducting corporate iLnc=me taxez associated with shrimp processing (Annex 5, Table8 for Cash Flow Projections for Visakhapatnam Seafood Plant). May 1978 ANNEX 5 Table 3

INDIA

ANDHRAPRADESH FISHERIES PROJECT

Economic Analysis

Composite Cost/Benefit Analysis for Kakinada Harbor f

Economic Cost Economic Benefit Harbor / 23m MFV lm MFV Harbor / 23m MFV S/ 1Om MFV / Existing MFV Years (C1) (C2) (C3) (Bl) (B2) (B3) (B4) ------Rs '000 ------1 11,587 - 3,200 - 2 24,935 _ 4,ooo - - _ - 3 24,055 14,646 4,800 _ 3,034 6,069 1,500 4 - 14,646 5,600 - 6,o69 12,138 3,000 5 - 14,646 6,400 1,609 12,138 24,276 6,ooo 6 - 14,646 - 2,413 18,207 36,414 9,000 7 - 14,643 _ 4,022 30,345 60,690 15,000 8-15 - - 4,022 30,345 60,690 15,000 16 - - 3,200 4,022 30,345 60,690 15,000 17 - - 4,000 4,022 30,345 60,690 15,000 18 - - 4,8oo 4,022 30,345 60,690 15,000 19 - 14,146 5,600 4,022 30,345 60,690 15,000 20 (25,980) (13,181) (3,306) 4,022 30,345 6o,690 15,000

Base Economic Rate of Return 45% - All Costs Up 10% 42% All Costs Up 20% 39% All Benefits Down 10% 42% All Benefits Down 20$ 38% All Costs Up 20% All Benefits Down 20% 33%

Investments in harbor works and fishing vessels are regarded as a composite undertaking. Costs/benefits in foreign exchange have been calculated at a shadow rate Rs 10.00 to US$1.00. Economic costs of investment and economic benefits are otherwise financial costs and benefits net of relevant duties and taxes. Economic costs derived by deducting 2% taxes from financial costs. Based on financial cost less 5% duty on imported vessels and shadow exchange rate of Rs l0.00:US$1.00. Deployment of 3 vessels each for years 3 to 8 (a total of 15) is projected to come into operation by private sector operators using their own funds. Financial costs less 5% taxes. Deployment of 20 units for year 1, 25 year 2, 30 year 3, 35 year 4, and 40 for year 5 (a total of 150). s Expected revenues of wharfage and port fees from vessels using the harbor. These appear as items in operating costs of fishing vessels. Catch is expected to achieve full development level in year 7, and it is assumed that 60% of the full development catch will be achieved in year 6, 40% in year 5, 20% in year 4, and 10% in year 3. The economic value of the catch is derived by applying the shadow exchange rate to the gross sales which are largely exportable shrimp (see Annex 5, Table 1 for Cash Flow Projections). A fleet of 15 non- project 23m MFVs are expected. / Catch projections and application of the shadow exchange rate as per 23m MFVs. See Annex 5, Table 2 for Cash Flow Projections. A fleet of 150 project lm MFVs projected. Incremental economic benefits are expected from the existing fleet of about 300 MFVs, and estimated to be Rs 50,000 per vessel at full development. As these vessels would be operating from the new harbor closer to the fishing grounds, they would save on the cost of operation and increase gross sales as a result of increased fishing time.

May 1978 ASPAD INDIA

ANDHRAPRADESH FISHERIES PROJECT

Economic Analysis

ciompositeCost/Benefit Analysis for NizampatnamHarbor

EconomicCost EconomicBenefit Harbor ~ Vessels ~ Seafood.Plant375Hror7 9m MFV 6/ Sing V. 7/ SaodPat8 Years (Cl) (c2) (C3) (Bl) - (B2) (B3) (B4)

1 1,088 - 2 2,984 - 3,109 2,530 1,660 285 69 25 725 2,710 570 138 51 5 - 2,710 200 1.,140 276 103 6 - 305 1,710 414 154 7-18 - - 305 2,850 690 257 19 - 2,530 305 2,850 690 257 20 (3,356) (2,277) 305 2,850 690 257

Base EconomicRate of Return 15% All Costs UP 10% 16% All Costs Up 20% 14% All BenefitsDown 10% 16% All BenefitsDown 20% 14% All Costs Up 20% All BenefitsDown 20% 11%

Investmentsin harborworks, fishingvessels, and seafoodplant are regardedas a compositeundertaking. Costs/benefitsin foreign exchangehave been calculatedat a shadow rate Rs 10.00 to US$1.00. Economic costs of investmentand economaicbenefits are otherwisefinancial costs and benefitsnet of relevant duties and taxes. ~/Economiccosts derivedby deducting2% taxes from financialcosts. ~/Deploymentof 5 vessels each for years 2 to 5 and 10 vessels for year 6. Based on financialcosts less relevant taxes amountingto about 15% of investmentcost. ~/Expectedrevenues of wharfageand-port fees from vesselsusing the harbor. These appear as items in operatingcosts of fishingvessels. Catch is expectedto achieve full developmentlevel in year 7, and it is assumed that 60% of the full economicvalue of the catch is derivedby applyingthe shadow exchangerate to the gross sales of gm MFVs which are largelyfrom exportableshrimp (see Annex 5, Table 4 for Cash Flow Projections). 7]Sameas financialbenefits (Annex 5, Table 6). Economicbenefits of the Seafood Plant have been calculatedby introducingthe shadowexchange rate to the cost of exportableshrimp raw materialas well as gross sales, and deductingcorporate income taxes associatedwith shrimpprocessing (Annex 5, Table 9 for Cash Flow Projectionsfor Visakhaptnam Seafood Plant).

May 1978 ASPAD ANNEX6

INDIA

ANDHRA PRADESH FISHERIES PROJECT

Estimated Quarterly Schedule of Disbursements 1/

IBRD FY and Quarters Disbursements Cumulative Disbursements ------US$1000… September, 1978 50 50 December, 1978 50 100 March, 1979 100 200 June, 1979 300 500

September, 1979 522 1,022 December, 1979 822 1,844 March, 1980 822 2,666 June, 1980 1,122 3,788

September, 1980 1,457 5,245 December, 1980 1,657 6,902 March , 1981 1,657 8,559 June, 1981 1,857 10,416

September,,1981 1,612 12,028 December , 1981 1,412 13,440 March, 1982 1,212 14,652 June, 1982 1,012 15,664

September, 1982 156 15,820 December, 1982 156 15,976 March, 1983 312 16,288 June , 1983 312 16,600

September, 1983 355 16,955 December , 1983 355 17,310 March, 1984 2/ 190 17,500 June , 1984 - 17.500

1/ Credit is expected to become effective July 31, 1978. 2/ Closing date is assumed to be September 30, 1984. ANNEX 7 Page 1

INDIA

ANDHRA PRADESH FISHERIES PROJECT

Related Documents and Data in Project File

A. Reports on Studies in the Sector or Sub-Sector

1. Exploited Marine Fishery Resources of India: A Synoptic Survey with Comments on Potential Resources. Central Marine Fisheries Resources Institute, Bulletin 27, March 1976.

2. "Fisheries Resources of the Indian Economic Zones", P. C. George et. al., draft paper for presentation to Indian Ocean Fisheries Commission meeting, Cochin, October 1977.

3. Report of the National Commission on Agriculture, Part VIII, Fisheries, Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation, New Delhi, 1976.

4. Statistics of Marine Products Exports, 1976, The Marine Products Export Development Authority, Cochin, 1977.

B. Reports Related to the Project

Project Reports

1. Integrated Marine Fisheries Development at Visakhapatnam (Stage II): Main ]?roject- Harbor and Associated Facilities; Sub-project - Facilities for other Fishing Villages. Department of Fisheries, GOAP, September 1977.

2. Integrated Development of Traditional Fishing in Northern Region of East Godavari District (Gadimoga - Pentakota). Department of Fisheries, GOAP, September 1977.

3. Integrated Marine Fisheries Development at Nizampatnam: Main Project - Harbor and Associated Facilities; Sub-project - Facilities for other Fishing Villages. Directorate of Fisheries, GOAP, September 1977.

Visakhapatnam Harbor

1. Fishing Harbor Project, Stage II Development Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam Port Trust, October 1976. ANNEX 7 Page 2

2. Visakhapatnam Port Fishing Harbor Project Report. Howe India Pvt. Ltd., Consulting Engineers, July 1971.

3. Visakhapatnam Outer Harbor Inauguration Report. Visakhapatnam Port Trust, December 1976.

4. Administration Reports and Annual Accounts, 1974 and 1975. Visakhapatnam Port Trust.

Kakinada Harbor

1. Kakinada Port Outer Fishing Harbor Project. Director of State Ports, GOAP, October 1977.

2. Development of Kakinada Port, Efficiency of Sand Trap and Development of Small Boar Harbor. Specific Note No. 1652, Central Water and Power Research Station, Poona, April 1977.

3. Design of the Breakwater Proposed at Kakinada Port. Specific Note No. 1703, Central Water and Power Research Station, Poona, September 1977.

Nizampatnam Harbor

1. Fishery Harbor at Nizampatnam, Volume I, Project Report on Engineering Investigations, Design and Abstract Estimate. Department of Fisheries, GOAP, September 1977.

2. Preliminary Survey of Fishing Harbors, India Nizampatnam Engineering Survey Soil Investigations and Design. Scandia Consult International, Gothenburg, Sweden, 1971, for FAO.

Andhra Pradesh Fisheries Corporation

1. Articles of Association of the Andhra Pradesh Fisheries Corporation Pvt., Ltd.

2. Andhra Pradesh Fisheries Corporation Unaudited Balance Sheets and Profit-and-Loss Accounts for 1975/76 and 1976/77.

3. Brief Note on the Boat Building Yard (Kakinada). Andhra Pradesh Fisheries Corporation, September 1977.

4. Six-Year Perspective Plan on Fresh Fish Marketing. Andhra Pradesh Fisheries Corporation, September 1977. ANNEX 7 Page 3

C. Working Papers, Tables, Drawings and Maps

1. Maps oE Visakjapatnam, East Godavari and Guntur Districts showing village roads.

2. Mission Consultant's Report on Harbors (I. B. Meeke).

3. Mission Consultant's Report on Vessels (Cy Hamlin).

4. Vessel Blueprints. INDIA ANDHRA PRADESH FISHERIES PROJECT Government of India Fisheries Organization Chart

| GCoverm nht of Ini

| and lUionf

Marine Productt iecretary |r5ury S MinirtryAgiculture of MunturVDivelopmentofRCseaech DtrDrtment of Agr,cuCture ExPott Deplrtment of Aeericultumie Edurnion AuthoritY and RuraiOwvrlopment Wennr R rit

Additional 6ScretarY R and FisheriesB W Ficultural eearch Ar

B Mar|ine iebsRoete ch Joint Secrettrry ~& Intuuo F,sberies

Central Inland I _ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~FisheriesRetatch _= [ i | I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~nstituto

Fisheries anurI i { Inbnd FisheriEeensi|n|

Central Instituteot | EYDIOrAtCrY l ~~CentralInstitute of FisheriesTechnoloogY H FisheriesProiec | Fishwies Educ.ti.o

Pro-investment Unit _ unvey of Fishing _ Inland Fisheries Training H,rtxors Project

PelWkFishNb, u ~~~~RegionalTraining C ntnl for Intend Fiihorier

| IFAO/UNOP) |eEtninrannCne _ Cntr.l Fisheri EeniTiigCnt

Frllsh Wne11trri*h Flrm (Demonstration)

iBrackish Water Fish Form (Demonstrtion) World Ebank-1Ei462 INDIA ANDHRA PRADESHFISHERIES PROJECT Governmentof AndhraPradesh ProjectRelated Ministries Fisheriesand State Ports Departments OrganizationChart

Council of Ministers

Chief Minister

|Ministers of|

j3.Eaveti Rej FinancE3url Public Works Fisheries Development

D |n Special Secrery and screttry w4nnsand Comrmisioner S cret ry Transport, Roads R-lDeZeoprns.t Institutional Finance Finance and Planning a,rd Buildings

O ¢uly Si pt oar eputy euvScretary D Secretaryrtity elForestsF sSresu[y jinance (Planning) Deputy Secretarv

7 | Assseart Siecrexar]| | Assistnt Secretary Assittant Secretary F iFisneites} _(_ _ v | t(u (Expenditures) Assinant Secreteny Assistant Secretary I l Rurail Development

ooirectofishies L - -t- _ r

World Bank - 18391 INDIA ANDRHA PRADESH FISHERIES PROJECT Government of Andrha Pradeph Department of Fisheries Orfganization Chart

.SS

NEW WVING TO BE ESTABLISHE4D UNDEOF THE PROJECT

Adn,rrttrattct. rlitegAdd P.an|-t l o t ~~~~~------,j

Deut Dcto DpuyD,tcr euyDrcorDpt retor euyD,r.ror I eut IO: Detcto

Geleral brogf ms Plaoney a dProlems | f~~~~~~~~~~~~Fntet C.c Ftettee'y Carelto Fttev er

_._~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~' IV D"t

DISInCI Oittttct Icytitete DIRTCtE *~f OW".eat.c Ue, r.act jt Oeu.toU..t

W.rid teth183900 INDIA ANDRHA PRADESH FISHERIES PROJECT RebMtlon Bet. Dlstrict Adminiration and Fi .eriesDepartm. ent Organization Chart

ChiefMister nd Cucil of Mnitrer I

| SlcrearV Fishsails s{ SirlrRtnl} Slrtrpnhvt ttndRU- d Dtwolop-nent Secretary 'SeDrslary mentyac

DistrictZille Perteeced Committee | AssisanaDirector J District Collcton Eleeted Otllciti 0111ct Ececte

Vielshepnarss r1-- - _ All Depaerunerrt Heeds _____^ Eglei Vis khvttgidm X ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~FishteriesAssistant Director. keccutiuf Engineers

FisheeitesAsnistente 121 In~~~~~spetritFrilteries DOf.cerDi npetrIiutnttFisheries Blck CDunlopretOfie Elnsctd;;; Memberas Inspector tlliInspector (1)l| Insp ector tIll 5 e s c r a t a r V A s s s n i d n c e .| Inland Fisheries _ SFDA FrogremVJ Anenastalti Visaklrapetnetn Visalkhapastrem j Vill;oge ______[~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~ih, A.muntb Dih| |- Di|flcck DZ elcPtent OliC- 1 Fid-S ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Fisrtnies

1.1.'n"d DA WollramFishFir,-.1 Seed Ferry Fish B-ffoatLoan Program5 -| -E-nte-nent-VikkApAllage[ 9 } 0lFhm F iset Oflictrd Irtiv, . i 3 Vi kakhapatnam [ nginelers _t

' Inspector tll |kAssisatkrtthpt. 21 Vijavensperem [ VillargePaochtyiet

Fieldj WorkersS L _ Ececutine O klicer Elected Members _- _- _- _-ic. FhFitrFisF hdFisheus 13i | | d Stell fron I Enyeer iilNspctor I 2Sf r fI alltots I tJ Place aerene are ilottrative of tvptcVl District nNosilta.. [ S. V/ Smell Fetmers Droeloprent Agency Ffish ESeedfa-World BPnk - t83 INDIA ANDHRA PRADESHFISHERIES PROJECT Andhra PradeshFisheries Corporation ProposedOrganization by Functional Unit

Chuirman & Board of Directors

MaaigDrector

Project F inancil Management Management Unit Unit

P tnam Vi nlmada K tp Niz rn Yiukha,oMnage General ManNger AlUt d nroral ManeWr Projectxect Wgem Project Executive Proaect Exeutanae Projectz cutiv I~~~~~~~~~~~~R,gistrrdOffice)

rt |sit ri znMwktdiI. Pand rcrnn and-|Freezing Ice Pand rMarketingyFreezingFrPand

lplant Prcrnsnt Pnlant Prorure- IceshoPin Otec (Nellore) _ ~~Expot °rdmn,ad_ Hvderabad C~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Mretnter xin nco Inland~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~n Prcue

w Workshop, Banki- 18381 | Fithing l i ~~~~~Slipway Fishing Gear, Extension | OPeratlons_ _ nd | ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~and a nd ( 23 m Trawlers)| Workshop Transpr Outreach Vehiee |Extension |Accounts | Units do not necesswily | _ _ and | Brackish |Accounts | Note: Functional |and or eqtualmantiepment Outreach Podala, and Markett'ngAdministration | ae ih_ MAd~lad|implyBardkMtters separate | Farm ||Administration |positions

| Pl.rmingr r | 'and Personnel | Developmnen

I I I ~~~~~~~~Secretary i nterna! |_ _ to| Audit |Board Maners |World Bank -18381 INDIA ANDHRAPRADESH FISHERIES PROJECT Schemmiic Drawing of iO Meter Mechanized Fishing Vessel

o TYPiCAL PAR1TICULAAS t &A.I OW AA 10.33 n,(33'- IO") o 1 2 3 4 6 6 7 a a"1" 2.90mIel - B") l MA.RMu, - 1.14..1-- 9JJ

Scl. C--. INDIA PROJECT ANDHRA PRADESH FISHERIES SchematicDrawing of 9 Meter MechanizedFishing Vessel(pablo Boat)

JFish T t Fh"sHoI !

PARTICULARS JTYPICAL (30') 0 1 ~~~~~2 All 9m + Meters Length Over 2.6Om18'q6" Draft, Maximum 40 T-7 e10 Shaft Horsepo,I 3ox nat6 40-s8 scale2 Crew sor

World Banfk - ISI81 INDIA ANDHRA PRADESHF ISHER I ESPROJECT SchematicDrawing of Non-MechanizedFishing Nava

I ~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~W_

TYPICAL PARTICULARS

O 1 2 3 Length Over All 12m (39' -4"1 I _ | I g Meters Beam 3.00m (10'-0") Draft, Maximum 0.6 m (2' - 0") o 2 4 6 8 10 Crew 7 I I I I I I I I I I Feet Approximate Scale World Bank - 18183 INDIA ANDHRA PRADESHFISHERIES PROJECT Trawler &Sluntic Drawing of 23 Meter Shrimp

C~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~W_0I

WI HaJd rt] | ~~~~~~~Fish

-t- t -- t~~~

TYPICAL PARfTICULARS 2 Meters 2 Over All 7 3m {5-"-6b') ~Draft LCrthoe~~~~~~~~~~~~~Length maximum rl .2rm123 Approxima, Fee 11t 12 tt4 t 16 1 6 8 ShaftHorsepowe, 8 c-18182

WOrld Bhnk - 18182 INDIA ANDHRA PRADESH FISHERIES PROJECT Project Implementation Schedule

ACTIVITY 1978 1979 1980 2 1981 3 1982 4 19B3 5

HARBOR WORKS VISAKHAPATNAM - -_ - -- - Jettiesand Repair Facilities I- Buildings, Roadsand Services l -

KAKINADA Legend

Breakwater - ______--indicates planning. Jetties investigations, designs and Buildings Roads and Services procurement. Dredging indicates execution

NIZAMPATNAM - - - - _

Dredging Quay Buildings Roads and Services

VILLAGE ACCESS ROADS AND WATER SUPPLY - -- _ Village Roads Villaye Water Supply (Nizampatnam)

FISHING VESSELS 10 Meter MFVs 9 Meter MFVs Non- MFVs

SEAFOOD PROCESSINGPLANTS AND TRUCKS _ _

Visakhapatnam Nizampatnamr

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

Estuarial Specialists 3 Man Months Naval Architect 6 man months Training Overseas Wooden Trawlers

World Bank - 18367 INDIA ANDHRA PRADESHFISHERIES PROJECT ImplementationSchedule - Harbor Construction

1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 ACTIVITY Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

VISAKHAPATNAM _ _ _ Preliminary Works Additional Jetties Completion of Slipway Facility Dredging Net Drying Area Land Acquisition Buildings Roads, Drainsand Culverts Power and Water Supply

KAKINADA _ _ _ _ Breakwater with Road Land Jetty (10 m boats) Outfitting - Berthing Jetty (10 m boats) Berthing Jettys (10 m boats) Trawler Jetty (23 m boats) Auction Halls Dredging Channel& Basin Boat Repair Facility Buildings Roads and Drainage Power, Water and Fuel Supply

NIZAMPATNAM Dredging Execavation Revetments Quay and Ramp Auction Hall Surfacing Port Area Buildings Approach Road (Swamp) Approach Road (High Ground) Marine Facilities (Lights, Workshop) Power, Water and Lighting

indicates execution _ _- -indicates planning, investigation,designs,procurementand mobilization. World Bank -18416 INDIA ANDHRA PRADESH FISHERIES PROJECT V iSAKMAPATNAM SchematicPlan of Seafood ProcessingPlant

[ RESIDENCE 1 1 0 2 4 6 8 10 13.5 X 16.5 I METERS

SCALE 1 - 1:40 ELEVATOR & ICESTORAGE Room dimensions in motors CHUTE 160Tons 6X6 16 X 10

OFFICE 10.5 X 2.5

/ SECONDFLOOR PLAN / 74 / _

/ ,/

IDINING // GENERATO 6 X 6 _ ROOM I FROZENSTORAGE / ~~~150Tons/ WAITING 18 X9 /

FROZEN STORAGE / / 300 Tons / / WORK

Trr _ z 18 X 18 /IMACHINE ROOM SHOP /z . FROZEN SlTORAGE / 18 X /s 150 Tons / / ll l. ll ll 18BXl9 / STORES / / ~~~~~~~~~~~6X4 BATH AND /f DRESSING ROOMS (---… - 8ATH2 AND _g PLATE/ 10 X 8 IoX8 AUCTION HALL PLATE IFREEZERSa PROCESSING HALL FREEFISH E MS . _ 18 X 40 1 L STORAGE I ICE MAKING ROOM 80Tons lo x 16 I ~~~~~~~~~~~~14 ICE 10: a IOX- 4 ICRUSHER - - ______Lr ------= __ ,

U GROUND FLOOR PLAN

/ QUAW

World Bank -18229 INDIA ANDHRA PRADESH FISHERIESPROJECT N IZAMPATNAM SchematicPlan Seafood ProcessingPlant

23 0 2 4 6 8 . . METERS

SCALE 1 - 1: 10

- .------4 Room dimensions in meters

DINING OFFICE MACHINE ROOM 5 X 4 ROOM 5 X _4 5X 14

WAITING STORE FROZEN ROOM ROOM STORAGE 3X4 3X4 6 X 4 ANTI ROOM 20 RER ICE TANK PLATE ril 9 X 10 FREE ZER -

-BOYS BATH AND DRESSING AUCTION

PROCESSING HL HALLL4 10 X 10

COLD & ICE STORAGE GIRLS BATH AND DRESSING 5 X 10

iQUAY\ ___

World Bank - 18228

77' 78° 79- zoo ! 818 82' 831 84' 85° INDIA ANDHRAPRADESH FISHERIES PROJECT °

e D I LJA <\ 8 A D 1 A g . Project Districts and Areas

19- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Gd'ova

wt / a \>_54; f~~~ PR ADES5H \

N NIZA M ABA Dr' K A RiMGN OGDAAR SR I K A K U L ste/

A K- Kd - D,A riNs .. J- ...... / WARANGAL VISAKHAP|

g ~~~~~~~~HY D ER AYBAD N A L.G ON D A_, XG ODA

_g WESTj \i<; Weztit -17 ' - (4-) / iV-t _ ) r )>XA S S ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~GODAV AR Ij, Q iitod OP City 0,,i Hb,loor Sites

F~~~~~~~~ >

,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~o$~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 Ci

o o -BVo n-/fichihi g o tr eounm a i B- - in niSorie t e r fero

< M4 | tpoQ c4 T 1- X K U R N O O L O NG O LE ) Bci,

~~A ANA N T A PU R g N E L L OR E ) N O .y .n -~~

~~K-8 \ C H INA 77 l I S TAPA 8 * J |I D\0 3;4 120 103 1Ste 27~~

~~N.derhds e X / ( ~~~~~~~~~~CH I rT 0 ws~~

~~Bangolr-e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~4o| % ;\bllft4Rt Ba of hL o l~~

~~77' 76, 7q' °t e 82 terwa~~

~~IBRD123252R r CCP 30CC E 3 100 E 32000E 33 000E00 3500 000 7003 39000E 40000 41000 MAV TV1~~

~~O,RI0 ADOPTED S PROJECTMETRIC GRID~~

~~INDIA 50 ANDHRA:PRADESH FISHERIES:POJC YISAKHAPATNAM Propowe4Hoo mp "rov,entsqr4 Foc-ifiiti,~~

~~2900N-~~

~~Stage flBilig~~

~~0 17T'T f Cutsand Fills 2-Beld Contaurs Shoreline 2709 04~~

~~~~~~~~kZ h 2~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~500N-~~

~~nod not bel:mow ntOnwwntr~~

~~p IEast:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~L Breakwater3 P 1 ~~~CHINA~~

~~INDIA 0 S~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~AKCHAFATNAM JTOS~~

~~LA-K I IBRD)13253R~~

~~5 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~MARCH1978~~

~~-2 ~~~~~~~~2,4 INDIA~~

~~- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ANDHRAPRADESHFISHERIES PROJECT KAKINADA 'S -~~~ ~jj ______- ~~~~m-~~jr~z~~ -r r ~ ~ Proposed New Fishing Horbor~~

~~-Project Structures 0 0 ~~~~~~~~~~~o[7 C~~~~~~~~~~TTTCutsond Fills o ,. 2' t H~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~reiusPojc o ~ revous rojct ood (Not funded by Bank) Shoreline~~

~~K 000~~~~~~~~~~ Eo ~~~~~~oT"00~~

~~-2 24APPRC2A(II 0:ANt4TEL FrR TRAWLERCCOUGE T'C 40,,~~

~~/ ~~~~~Planof Proposed Breokwater ond Harbor Facilities-2 I-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-~~

~~Location PlanRos~~

-'''- -0 - Railroads~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~alrcd PreviousProject Rooads / ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(Notfunded by Bank) I ,yPTovvsedBTeoko.otoo *, ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Soindand Mud Flots ti~l,h~eHo,L,o~ Godovori Point

~~.,,d or. biowMe,Mes Veeeis SprinsTid.s C IC~'C~~

~~TC,,/,C- OCYI CHINACiyo V/odd08554 Stoffa,CI,ooNfs, ~ ~ ~ ~ Cty o~~

~~C,-I,o,5,,o,,04KAKINADA bOdt,A,,o,0,,10000 PAKISTAN, - V~~

~~00 0100 20700 KAK,NAD~~

~~o 100- 200 KAKN~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ METERS 0 I~~~~~~S~ AKAKIOETR I IBRD 13254R~~

~~3130 N / ! < /30000 29000N 2108 0800 MARCH 1978 Proposed New FishingHoarbor Survey of Harbor Entrance~~

~~080770finAesncclesfcluSlvOr / O@', * e707 11 C (3 o 50 00 BedC8ntOro on d Location of TrainingWolfs~~

~~.7 000;g ,7$ lt' 1 200 4>,ye, b, -/ ,5ET/ERS Ng;PAM:DW)e X tARs0, 5 c aS 0 N~~~~~~~~~~~~0~~

~~K:-~~~~~~~~ \ ~ ~~~~~w N ____ of3 _ / ______->Kdb:1 1 -S> r z 0808r02Sw8 1e1 r. eeosEutdt0srsrdou 200-80A~~

~~zsooE~~~~~~~~~~~ \ ,' 000~ 30, 2 0 00...... 1N 2N\0N Z \ 2 3s~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~00 800 *0,2,,,mJo 0w e||Mo e~~

~~'5770 ~ ~ t<.W 07,q00 0z 070 50 'I.-t N H A P AD S IH RE R JC~~

~~~~.+ 3N, NIZAMPATNAM / ,00 >7o 80 VI7LLAGE 0'PopsdNw abr n aclte~~

~~LocotionPlan ,~~~~~---- -> 70 d., 1 rosdAproc Rood.1 Ali.RedI- Contours in Meters~~

~~NIZAMPATNAM s0 N ooo s . 3so N DOD 350 N 200 .0 or Proposed Approoch Rood ,\ -- - -- tX~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_|__-;\'\i(Beingsh Implemented- P A r ,,,.,7.00or to er Fosooc 97j~~

~~0 soo iooo 0. 008 S~~~~~~~~~~~ 07777745700 48000 .MANGROVEA0rMEGRID00000 00800. , 000 K 0008SH ANDHRAD1PRADET ESH FIHEIEIPOJCRISKRO EC~~

~~To Srikokulo- AFHAISA INDIA A~~~~~~~~AN H I A N Kop la f all~~

~~PAKISTANr,H ANDHRA PRADESHFISHERIES PROJECT Koppa hrtpl~~

~~4,.1 t - rjj - FishingVillage AccessRoads and VisakhapatnamHarbor rnmayyapalem& < > -'C) / l ~~~~~VISAKHAPATNAMDISTRICT |/OV1S~~~'O SD I N DI A !t 2EURMA/i~~

~~- \ ERADEjS\D)avaram SHA Gudj7\ o~~

~~B | O2F8AY 8,61VOA Z 0 Podonagrnayyap0lem~~

~~2Sfji LANKA heemunipofO~~

~~5 % SRIKAKULAM Chodavaram~~

~~Li VhapAKHA TNAM h pa C tnj=<\aM 2-\)voAF KY > % = C = VSSAKHAPAtNAM~~

~~EA 5 T 8 /NEGA/ GO DAVAR I Y ARAOF MAP~~

~~2/ gr d~~~Vaacheepurul I i +pae~~

~~/ i-93lu~~~~~~~fmmopalem~~

~~.1) < PROJECT\ / /adopatemFEATURES K d Road Improvements Proposed New Roads~~

~~-Road Numbers~~

~~0;9< / / Visakhapatnam Harbor Kotaptnom /evupalavaram Bangarammapalom/ EXISTING FEATURES < ~~~~~Reuooahnao mplem od L ~~~~~~Roads /- ! :::Railroads~~

~~T./ N ° Villages and Towns District Boundaries 5 ,' B A Y OF ,9ENGAL I State Boundaries Edatom - International Boundaries - -O ).V6nkatanagaram~~

~~manupeta o 0 20~~

~~;// _ > A1E K I LOM TEERS 5,O~~

~~PROJECTFEATURES INDIA Road Improvements ANDHRA PRADESHFISHERIES PROJECT ProposedNew Roads (O) Road Numbers FishingVillage AccessRoads and KakinadoHarbor a Kakinado Harbor EAST GODAVARIDISTRICT~~

~~EXISTING FEATURES - T?ni~~

~~Roads 1 Railroads - D Cainals (aflko- ( .o)f o Villages and Towns / Yo E -r91 d - - Taluk Boundaries 7 A\//ornr I'> - District Boundaries Kothpud Veanc - - International Boundaries _ Addripeato~~

~~o 10 20 / / / / < , / oioJrlipe3r2 KILOMETERS ID~~

~~NOI1E TAL9( B0IJNIDAR ES ARE APPROX MAE\~~

~~4t z J \ ArploteX f C-nrl/RS ' [' J \ / /\ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~Pithapuram-Cacppf~~

~~PAKISTAN CH I N A \agamrepeto /t9~~

~~/ >> UTAN. 4 f- / < p of KzAsto sHuTvJ, 5 (\ / Peddapuram - / Upoda~~

~~C ? g fi \ / - - X niu~~~~~~~ ~ ozocreA~~~~molkof~~

~~SINIKA N- D PRADES~~~~~~~~~~~~Kkn RRO~~

~~BA_Y OF BENGA- N A I D A~~

~~SRILANKA~~

~~, r \G DAVARI <~~

~~A~~~~G V P2 G:ODAVARI O 9MAP R NDRAPURAM~~

~~GODAVRI ~ ~ BNGL $4O.P ~-~~

8A Y~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~d EfEE RE d,.. ______S RI ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ U,~~ 4 ZZ NGH4 Z ot l \<~~~~~') 7/ /h~,..~ rnsm4.. rhb 9wVR d,lSIZ,*Jyb4rThnhhAherv*NrSht&,k .,d,fl -e r , 1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~d/SMNd', ) d Edtdt El EIE d'IEE El =d EidE ELr

~~INDIA PROJECTFEATURES ANDHRA PRADESHFISHERIES PROJECT Road Improvements Fishing Village Access Roads and Nizampatnam Harbor -ProposedNew Roads GUNTURDISTRICT O Road Numbers~~

* Nizampatnam Harbor ,

~~EXISTING FEATURES Roads~~

~~Railroads \ - CanolCanals Ponnur odava~~

~~0 Villages and Towns b \. 5' --- Taluk Boundaries 5 /\ - District Boundaries~~

~~- International Boundaries~~

~~o 2 4 6 8 0/ apat a KILOMETERS~~

~~\ A P/ 1 A T ALL A /\..\~~

~~S _S , f , C0EC H NR g ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~/ U >; US , e 0~~~~~~ |L L E Xl~~

~~-PAKISTAN/,~~

~~INDIA C h tarevu BURMA (I~~

~~Cpat-a I revu (New 3rYdge Kothalolew 0/~~

~~5n DvSr ROAD \ OgNAG O L /.~E Muthaipcal¢em MZAMPATNAM dipalem NA 418I IAAndisomudram 44 A r A EiANKA . G .) U N T U iSSABEI55R~~

~~NAL GONDA N Koavodiorevu~~

~~ffAr Of BifrjG Mth. 4palem KAOO Mo *logunto.__~~

~~G UN TU R A~~~EAOFt B~8A Y O F BENIVG A I~~

~~m 0 N G 0 L E M.lr =7' kvoi~~

~~WSg$ktzDwsi 4~~