ISSN 1725-2423 Official Journal C230 of the European Union
Volume 49
English edition Information and Notices 23 September 2006
Notice No Contents Page
I Information
Commission
2006/C 230/01 Euro exchange rates ...... 1
2006/C 230/02 Publication of an application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and food- stuffs ...... 2
2006/C 230/03 Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4405 — Walter Frey Holding/Mitsubishi Motors Europe) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) ...... 5
2006/C 230/04 List of hop production areas ...... 6
2006/C 230/05 List of hop certification centres and the codes for each centre ...... 7
2006/C 230/06 List of recognised hop producer groups and associations ...... 11
2006/C 230/07 Report from the Commission on food irradiation for the year 2003 ...... 12
2006/C 230/08 Report from the Commission on food irradiation for the year 2004 ...... 28
European Central Bank
2006/C 230/09 Supplementary Code of Ethical Criteria for the members of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank (in accordance with Article 11(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Central Bank) ...... 46
European Defence Agency
2006/C 230/10 Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2005 ...... 48
EN (1) Text with EEA relevance 2 23.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 230/1
I
(Information)
COMMISSION
Euro exchange rates (1) 22 September 2006
(2006/C 230/01)
1 euro =
Currency Exchange rate Currency Exchange rate
USD US dollar 1,2817 SIT Slovenian tolar 239,60 JPY Japanese yen 148,89 SKK Slovak koruna 37,568 DKK Danish krone 7,4602 TRY Turkish lira 1,9618 GBP Pound sterling 0,67365 AUD Australian dollar 1,7013 SEK Swedish krona 9,2580 CAD Canadian dollar 1,4264 CHF Swiss franc 1,5812 HKD Hong Kong dollar 9,9761 ISK Iceland króna 90,97 NZD New Zealand dollar 1,9468 NOK Norwegian krone 8,3455 SGD Singapore dollar 2,0285 BGN Bulgarian lev 1,9558 KRW South Korean won 1 213,64 CYP Cyprus pound 0,5766 ZAR South African rand 9,8262 CZK Czech koruna 28,483 CNY Chinese yuan renminbi 10,1504 EEK Estonian kroon 15,6466 HRK Croatian kuna 7,4350 HUF Hungarian forint 276,97 LTL Lithuanian litas 3,4528 IDR Indonesian rupiah 11 778,82 LVL Latvian lats 0,6961 MYR Malaysian ringgit 4,711 MTL Maltese lira 0,4293 PHP Philippine peso 64,482 PLN Polish zloty 3,9784 RUB Russian rouble 34,1750 RON Romanian leu 3,5636 THB Thai baht 47,957
(1) Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB. C 230/2EN Official Journal of the European Union 23.9.2006
Publication of an application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs
(2006/C 230/02)
This publication confers the right to object to the application pursuant to Article 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006. Statements of objection must reach the Commission within six months from the date of this publication.
SUMMARY
COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 510/2006
Application for registration pursuant to articles 5 and 17(2)
‘BRYNDZA PODHALAŃSKA’
EC No: PL/PDO/005/0450/18.02.2005
PDO ( X ) PGI ( )
This summary has been drawn up for information only. For full details, interested parties and in particular the producers of the products covered by the PDO or PGI in question are invited to consult the full version of the product specification obtainable at national level or from the European Commission. (1)
1. Responsible department in the Member State:
Name: Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development Address: ul. Wspólna 30 PL-00-930 Warszawa Telephone: (48-22) 623 27 07 Fax No: (48-22) 623 25 03 E-mail: [email protected]
2. Group:
Name: Regionalny Związek Hodowców Owiec i Kóz Address: ul. Szaflarska 93 d/7 PL-34-400 Nowy Targ Telephone: (48-18) 266 46 21 Fax No: (48-18) 266 46 21 E-mail: [email protected] Composition: Producers/processors ( X ) other ( )
3. Type of product:
Class: 1.3 Cheeses
4. Specification (summary of requirements under Article 4(2))
4.1 Name: ‘Bryndza Podhalańska’
4.2 Description: The cheese ‘Bryndza Podhalańska’ belongs to the group of soft, rennin cheeses. Its colour may be white, creamy-white or with a willow green shade. It is a product with a strong, salty or slightly salty taste, or sometimes slightly sour. Bryndza Podhalańska is produced only from May to September.
(1) European Commission, Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, Agricultural Product Quality Policy, B-1049 Brussels. 23.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 230/3
The cheese's chemical composition: water content not more than 60 %, dry matter content not less than 40 % and fat content in the dry matter not less than 38 %.
4.3 Geographical area:
‘Bryndza Podhalańska’ is produced in the Nowotarski district, in the Tatrzański district and in the following six municipalities of the Żywiecki district: Milówka, Węgierska Górka, Rajcza, Ujsoły, Jeleśnia and Koszarawa. The traditional name for this region is ‘Podhale’ from which is derived the name ‘Bryndza Podhalańska’. The entire region enjoys favourable natural conditions and is also home to cheesemakers with specific skills associated with a knowledge of traditional production methods. Thanks to a combination of these factors, it is possible to produce in this region a product of appro- priate quality.
4.4Proofoforigin:
The system to check that the product is produced in accordance with the specifications guarantees the quality of the final product. A list of those engaged in producing Bryndza Podhalańska is kept. Only producers on this list are authorised to make this cheese. The producers keep appropriate records, which must make it possible to trace the product's manufacturing history. Each producer keeps a register at the place of manufacture, in which information on the manufacturing process is recorded. The inspection body monitors producers and undertakes appropriate controls in accordance with the approved plans.
4.5 Method of production:
Stage 1 — Obtaining the raw material — The ewes' milk used for production comes from ewes of the breed ‘Polska Owca Górska’ (Polish Mountain Sheep). Cows' milk, if it is used for production at all, comes from cows of the breed ‘Polska Krowa Czerwona’ (Polish Red). The cows' milk content, if used, must not exceed 40 % of the milk used in production.
Stage 2 — Renneting — the milk is subsequently subjected to a process in which protein is separated from the whey (klaganie).
Stage 3 — Curding — after the addition of rennet, the milk coagulates and turns into curd.
Stage 4 — Breaking up of the curd.
Stage 5 — Settlement of the curd — separation of the whey from the cheese curds.
Stage 6 — Decanting of the whey — whey collection.
Stage 7 — Dripping — the cheese mass is removed and is then allowed to drip.
Stage 8 — The cheese undergoes seasoning and fermentation.
Stage 9 — The fermented cheese is broken up into small chunks.
Stage 10 — Mixing — the broken-up cheese is mixed with salt — the result of this process is bryndza which, because of its unique ingredients and old method of production known and used exclusively in Podhale, is called Bryndza Podhalańska.
4.6 Link:
Historical
The tradition and importance of bryndza from Podhale and the surrounding areas is confirmed by literary references, in commands issued by rural landowners and royal decrees. The oldest references to bryndza date from 1527. There are also numerous references confirming that bryndza was used in this area as a method of payment or as one constituent of rents or duties paid. There are also many descriptions in literature of the way bryndza was produced, as well as information on its price over the years. The manufacture of cheese from sheep's milk was an essential part of the pasturing of sheep in Podhale over the centuries. The shepherds who went up into the mountains with their sheep would spend several months there. During that time they practically lived on sheep's milk and the products thereof alone. The know-how gained on the method and principles of producing Bryndza Podhalańska were passed down from generation to generation, to become an art that is particular to the producers in this region. Thanks to the combination of natural factors, specific skills and maintenance of the original formula, a unique product, ‘Bryndza Podhalańska’ is created. C 230/4EN Official Journal of the European Union 23.9.2006
Natural The milk from sheep of the Polska Owca Górska (Polish Mountain Sheep) breed is used to make Bryndza Podhalańska, to which cows' milk from the Polska Krowa Czerwona (Polish Red) breed may be added. The Polish Red is a native cattle breed, reared in Poland. This breed is closely connected with the history and tradition of Podhale and with the people living in this region. The very rich and varied vegetation to be found in this region also has an impact on the quality of the final product. There are many endemic plant species that grow only in Podhale and they constitute the flora of the meadows, pastures and mountain pastures. This unique vegetation influences the quality of the milk used in production. This combination of the quality of the raw material and producers' know-how and experience help to give Bryndza Podhalańska a unique taste all of its own. 4.7 Inspection body: Name: IJHARS — Agricultural and Food Quality Inspection. Address: ul. Wspólna 30 PL-00-930 Warszawa Telephone: (48-22) 623 29 00 Fax No: (48-22) 623 29 98 (48-22) 623 29 99 E-mail: —
4.8 Labelling: The registered product will bear the Protected Designation of Origin symbol. The packages of products intended for marketing, apart from the name ‘BRYNDZA PODHALAŃSKA’, will also bear the logo or the logo together with an inscription ‘Protected Designation of Origin’. The use of the abbreviation ‘P.D.O.’ on the package is allowed. 4.9 National requirements: — 23.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 230/5
Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4405 — Walter Frey Holding/Mitsubishi Motors Europe) Candidate case for simplified procedure
(2006/C 230/03)
(Text with EEA relevance)
1. On 15 September 2006, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertakings Walter Frey Holding AG (‘WFH’, Switzerland) und Mitsubishi Motors Europe B.V. (‘MME’, The Netherlands) acquire(s) within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation joint control of MME Vertriebsgesellschaft Schweiz AG (‘MME-CH’, Switzerland) by way of purchase of shares. 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: — WFH: Import, wholesale and retail of cars; — MME: Distribution of cars of the brand ‘Mitsubishi’ in Europe; — MME-CH: Import, wholesale and retail of cars of the brand ‘Mitsubishi’ in Switzerland and Liechten- stein. 3. On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice. 4. The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission. Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (fax No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4405 — Walter Frey Holding/Mitsubishi Motors Europe, to the following address: European Commission Directorate-General for Competition Merger Registry J-70 B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel
(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1. (2) OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32. C 230/6EN Official Journal of the European Union 23.9.2006
List of hop production areas
(2006/C 230/04)
This publication is in conformity with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1784/77 concerning the certification of hops.
BELGIUM West-Vlaanderen Oost-Vlaanderen Vlaams-Brabant Hainaut CZECH REPUBLIC Žatecko Úštěcko Tršicko GERMANY Hallertau Spalt Tettnang Rottenburg — Herrenberg — Weil der Stadt Rheinpfalz Bitburg Elbe-Saale SPAIN Castilla y León La Rioja FRANCE Alsace Nord HUNGARY Közép-Magyarország AUSTRIA Oberösterreich Niederösterreich Steiermark POLAND Lubelski Wielkopolski Dolnośląski SLOVENIA Slovénie SLOVAKIA Piešt'anská výrobná oblast' PORTUGAL Braga Bragança UNITED KINGDOM South East England West Midlands, including Hereford and Worcestershire 23.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 230/7
List of hop certification centres and the codes for each centre
(2006/C 230/05)
This publication is in conformity with Article 6(3) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 890/78 laying down detailed rules for the certification of hops.
Certification centres Code
BELGIUM
1. Pacohop SV, Kleine Casseldreef 2, B-8970 Poperinge 01BE
2. Jos Van Mollem-Catry, Stationsstraat 26, B-1745 Opwijk 25BE
3. Omnichem, Cooppalaan 91, B-9230 Wetteren 29BE
4. Gerda Lefevere, Mesenstraat 191, B-7784 Waasten 34BE
5. Cambie Hop, Elverdingseweg 16, B-8970 Poperinge 35BE
6. Eric Lagache, Sint-Pietersstraat 12, B-8970 Reningelst 37BE
7. Aardgrahop BVBA, Sint-Sixtusstraat 87, B-8970 Poperinge 38BE
8. Claerebout VOF, Hazewindstraat 13, B-8908 Vlamertinge 40BE
9. Jan Derycke, Lenestraat 2, B-8970 Poperinge 41BE
10. Patrick Rosseel, Westvleterseweg 14, B-8970 Poperinge 62BE
CZECH REPUBLIC
1. Ústřední kontrolní a zkušební ústav zemědělský, Chmelařské náměstí 1612, CZ-438 43 Žatec 01CZ
2. Ústřední kontrolní a zkušební ústav zemědělský, Vilová čtvrt' 204, CZ-411 45 Úštěk 02CZ
3. Ústřední kontrolní a zkušební ústav zemědělský, areál Chmelařství, CZ-738 57 Tršice 03CZ
GERMANY
HALLERTAU
SIEGELBEZIRK WOLNZACH:
1. Markt Wolnzach, Marktplatz 1, D-85283 Wolnzach 01DE
2. Nateco2 GmbH & Co KG., Auenstraße 18–20, D-85283 Wolnzach 07DE
3. Landeskuratorium für pflanzliche Erzeugung in Bayern e.V. (LKP), Tal 35, D-80331 München 10DE
SIEGELBEZIRK MAINBURG:
1. Hopfenhalle Joh. Barth & Sohn GmbH & Co KG, Freisinger Straße 15, D-84048 Mainburg 12DE
2. HVG-Halle, Freisinger Straße 48, D-84048 Mainburg 14DE
3. Hallertauer Hopfenveredelungsgesellschaft mbH (HHV mbH), Auhofstraße 16, D-84048 Mainburg 16DE
4. Stadt Mainburg, Marktplatz 1-4, D-84048 Mainburg 18DE
SIEGELBEZIRK AU/HALLERTAU:
1. Markt Au i. d. Hallertau, Untere Hauptstraße 2, D-84072 Au i. d. Hallertau 23DE
2. HHV Hallertauer Hopfenveredelungsgesellschaft, Mainburger Straße 26, D-84072 Au/Hallertau 24DE
SIEGELBEZIRK SIEGENBURG:
1. Markt Siegenburg, Marienplatz 13, D-93345 Siegenburg 28DE
1. Hopfenveredelung St. Johann GmbH & Co KG., Mainburger Straße 15, D-93358 St. Johann 32DE C 230/8EN Official Journal of the European Union 23.9.2006
Certification centres Code
SIEGELBEZIRK GEISENFELD:
Stadt Geisenfeld, Kirchplatz 4, D-85290 Geisenfeld 34DE
SIEGELBEZIRK ABENSBERG:
Stadt Abensberg, Stadtplatz 1, D-93326 Abensberg 37DE
SIEGELBEZIRK HOHENWART:
Markt Hohenwart, Marktplatz 1, D-86558 Hohenwart 38DE
SIEGELBEZIRK LANGQUAID:
Markt Langquaid, Marktplatz 24, D-84085 Langquaid 39DE
SIEGELBEZIRK NANDLSTADT:
Markt Nandlstadt, Rathausplatz 1, D-85405 Nandlstadt 40DE
SIEGELBEZIRK NEUSTADT/DONAU:
Stadt Neustadt a.d. Donau, Stadtplatz 1, D-93333 Neustadt a.d. Donau 41DE
SIEGELBEZIRK PFAFFENHOFEN/ILM:
Stadt Pfaffenhofen a.d. Ilm, Hauptplatz 1, D-85276 Pfaffenhofen a.d. Ilm 42DE
SIEGELBEZIRK PFEFFENHAUSEN:
Markt Pfeffenhausen, Marktplatz 3, D-84076 Pfeffenhausen 43DE
SIEGELBEZIRK ROTTENBURG/LAABER:
Stadt Rottenburg a.d. Laaber, Neufahrner Str. 1, D-84056 Rottenburg a.d. Laaber 44DE
SIEGELBEZIRK ALTMANNSTEIN:
Markt Altmannstein, Marktplatz 4, D-93336 Altmannstein 46DE
SPALT (S)
SIEGELBEZIRK KINDING:
Markt Kinding, Kipfenberger Straße 54, D-85125 Kinding 47DE
SIEGELBEZIRK SPALT-STADT:
1. Städtische Aufbereitungsanstalt, Hopfenhalle, Bahnhofstraße 4, D-91174 Spalt 48DE
2. Städtische Aufbereitungsanstalt, Hopfenhalle, Bahnhofstraße 4, D-91174 Spalt 50DE
HERSBRUCK (G)
Stadt Hersbruck, Unterer Markt 1, D-91217 Hersbruck 52DE
TETTNANG (T)
1. Siegelhalle WLZ-Baywa AG, Postfach 1544, D-88064 Tettnang 65DE
2. Siegelhalle Hildegard Eisemann KG, Kapellenweg 17, D-88074 Meckenbeuren 67DE
3. Siegelhalle Johann Barth & Sohn GmbH u. Co, Siggenweiler, Hopfengut 22, D-88069 Tettnang 68DE
RHEINPFALZ (R)
Siegelhalle, Bahnhofstraße 7, D-76889 Kapellen 70DE
BITBURG (BIT)
Siegelhalle, Auf der Hütte 2, D-54668 Holsthum 71DE 23.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 230/9
Certification centres Code
ELBE-SAALE
1. Hopfenlager Reichenbach, Agrar GmbH Scharfenberg, D-01665 Scharfenberg 82DE
2. Hopfenlager Kriepitz, D-01920 Elstra 83DE
3. Hopfenlager Niedergoseln, D-04769 Niedergoseln 84DE
4. Hopfenlager Beesenstedt, D-06198 Beesenstedt 85DE
5. Hopfenlager Prosigk, D-06369 Weißandt-Gölzau 86DE
6. Hopfenlager Salsitz, D-06712 Kretzschau 88DE
7. Hopfenlager Querfurt, D-06268 Querfurt 89DE
8. Hopfenlager Großenehrich, D-99718 Großenehrich 91DE
9. Hopfenlager Frömmstedt, D-99638 Kindelbrück 92DE
10. Hopfenlager Monstab, D-04617 Monstab 93DE
SPAIN
CASTILLA Y LEÓN
1. Sociedad Anónima Española de Fomento del Lúpulo, Campo de San Jorge s/n, Villanueva de Carrizo 1ES (León)
2. Investigación y Técnicas del Lúpulo SA, Campo de San Jorge s/n, Villanueva de Carrizo (León) 2ES
FRANCE
ALSACE
Cophoudal, 22, rue des Roses, F-67110 Brumath 1FR
NORD
Coophounord, 505, route de Poperinghe, F-50299 Boeschepe 2FR
HUNGARY
Zöldség-Gyümölcs Minőségellenőrzési Koordinációs Központ, Lehel u. 43-47, H-1135 Budapest 01HU
AUSTRIA
1. Hopfenbau Genossenschaft & Erzeugergemeinschaft, Linzer Straße 5, A-4120 Neufelden, 01AT Oberösterreich
2. Landwirtschaftliche Fachschule Edelhof, Edelhof 1, A-3910 Zwettl, Niederösterreich 02AT
3. Erzeugergemeinschaft für Hopfen in Leutschach, Eichberg 3, A-8463 Leutschach, Steiermark 03AT
POLAND
1. Wojewódzki Inspektorat Jakości Handlowej Artykułów Rolno-Spożywczych w Lublinie, ul. Nowy 1PL Świat 3, PL-20-418 Lublin
2. Wojewódzki Inspektorat Jakości Handlowej Artykułów Rolno-Spożywczych w Poznaniu, ul. Zielona 2PL 8, PL-61-851 Poznań
3. Wojewódzki Inspektorat Jakości Handlowej Artykułów Rolno-Spożywczych we Wrocławiu, ul. Ofiar 3PL Oświęcimskich 12, PL-50-069 Wrocław
4. ‘Richland’ Spółka z o.o., Osiny 35, PL-24-350 Chodel 4PL
5. ‘POWIŚLE’ Spółka Jawna, Kępa Chotecka 18, PL-24-313 Wilków 5PL
6. Wytwórnia Wody Źródlanej Połczyn Zdrój S.A., ul. Spółdzielcza 35, PL-75-202 Koszalin 6PL
7. ‘Chmiel Polski’ S.A., ul. Diamentowa 27, PL-20-471 Lublin 7PL C 230/10EN Official Journal of the European Union 23.9.2006
Certification centres Code
PORTUGAL Direcção Regional de Agricultura de Trás os Montes, Zona Agrária, P–5300 Bragança 1PT
SLOVENIA 1. Hmezad export — import d.d., Vrečerjeva 14, SLO-3310 Žalec 01SI 2. Unihop, trgovina in storitve d.o.o, Turiška vas 1, SLO-2382 Šmartno pri Slovenj Gradcu 02SI 3. Hmelj Dornava, proizvodnja in prodaja hmelja in drugih kmetijskih proizvodov d.o.o, Dornava 2, 03SI SLO-2252 Dornava 4. DR/Golding, Vinko Drča s.p., storitve za rastlinsko pridelavo, certificiranje in prodajo hmelja, 04SI Grajska vas 18, SLO-3303 Gomilsko 5. Agrohop, trgovina in storitve d.o.o., Gotovlje 31, SLO-3310 Žalec 05SI
SLOVAKIA Slovchmel cooperative, SK-916 24 Horna Streda 01SK
UNITED KINGDOM 1. English Hops and Herbs Ltd, Paddock Wood Warehouse, Paddock Wood, Tonbridge, Kent TN12 01UK 6BQ, United Kingdom 2. Steiner Hops Ltd, 319a High Street, Epping, Essex CM16 4DA, United Kingdom 09UK 3. Lupofresh Ltd, Benover Road, Yalding, Maidstone ME18 6ET, United Kingdom 10UK 4. Botanix Ltd, Process Plant, Eardiston, near Tenbury Wells, Worcs. WR15 8JJ, United Kingdom 12UK 5. Hawkins Hop Factors, The Farm, Bosbury, Ledbury, Herefordshire HR8 1NW, United Kingdom 20UK 6. English Hops and Herbs Ltd, Farmer Pudge & Co., New House Farms, Bishops Farm, Worcester 21UK WR6 5BT, United Kingdom 7. Botanix Ltd, Hop Pocket Lane, Paddock Wood, Tonbridge, Kent TN12 6DQ, United Kingdom 22UK 8. Wealden Hops Ltd, Congelow, Benover Road, Yalding, Maidstone, Kent ME18 6ET, United 24UK Kingdom 9. Hop Sales Ltd, Sherenden Farm, Tudeley, Tonbridge, Kent TN12 0PE, United Kingdom 25UK 10. Western Quality Hops Ltd, 3 Forge Bank, Bosbury, Ledbury, Herefordshire HR8 1JS, United 26UK Kingdom 23.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 230/11
List of recognised hop producer groups and associations
(2006/C 230/06)
This publication is in conformity with Article 6(2) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1351/72 on the recognition of producer groups for hops.
BELGIUM 1. Poperingse Afzetcoöperatie voor Hop SV (Pacohop SV), Korte Werf 9, B-8970 Poperinge 2. Nieuwe Hoptelersbelangengroep CV, Poperingseweg 412, B-8908 Vlamertinge
GERMANY 1. HVG Hopfenverwertungsgenossenschaft e. G., Kellerstraße 1, D-85283 Wolnzach 2. Hopfenverwertungsgenossenschaft Spalt e. G., D-91174 Spalt
SPAIN 1. Grupo de cultivadores de Lúpulo de Carrizo de la Ribera (APA no 1), Miralrio 2, Villanueva de Carrizo (León) 2. SAT ‘Orbigo’ no 9691 (APA no 3), Independencia 2, 2o, E-24001 León
FRANCE 1. Groupement de producteurs des planteurs de houblon d'Alsace ‘Cophoudal’, 22, rue des Roses, F-67110 Brumath 2. Groupement de producteurs des planteurs de houblon du Nord-Pas-de-Calais ‘Coophounord’, 505, route de Poperinghe, F-59299 Boeschepe
AUSTRIA 1. Erzeugergemeinschaft für Hopfen in Leutschach, Eichberg 3, A-8463 Leutschach 2. Hopfenbau Genossenschaft & Erzeugergemeinschaft, Linzer Straße 5, A-4120 Neufelden
POLAND 1. Roztoczańskie Zrzeszenie Producentów Chmielu, Żulice 16, PL-22-652 Telatyn 2. ‘Chmiel Wielkopolski’ Sp. z o.o., ul. Kolejowa 20, PL-64-300 Nowy Tomyśl 3. Lubelska Spółdzielcza Grupa Producentów Chmielu ‘Chmielarz’, ul. Partyzantów 12, PL-24-110 Nałęczów
PORTUGAL Bralúpulo — Produtores de lúpulo de Braga e Bragança, C.R.L., Lugar Vale d'Álvaro, Casa do Lavrador, P-5300-068 Bragança
SLOVENIA Hmeljarska zadruga d.o.o., Vrečarjeva 14, SLO-3310 Žalec
SLOVAKIA SLOVCHMEĽ družstvo, SK-916 24 Horná Streda
UNITED KINGDOM 1. English Hops and Herbs Ltd, Hop Pocket Lane, Paddock Wood, Tonbridge, Kent TN12 6DQ, United Kingdom 2. Wealden Hops Ltd, Congelow, Benover Road, Yalding, Maidstone, Kent ME18 6ET, United Kingdom 3. Western Quality Hops Ltd, 3 Forge Bank, Bosbury, Ledbury, Herefordshire HR8 1QU, United Kingdom 4. Hawkbrand Hops Ltd, The Farm, Bosbury, Ledbury, Herefordshire HR8 1NW, United Kingdom C 230/12EN Official Journal of the European Union 23.9.2006
Report from the Commission on food irradiation for the year 2003
(2006/C 230/07)
SUMMARY
According to Article 7 (3) of Directive 1999/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 February 1999 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning foods and food ingredi- ents treated with ionising radiation, the Member States shall forward to the Commission every year
— the results of checks carried out in the irradiation facilities, in particular regarding the categories and quantities of products treated and the dose administered and
— the results of checks carried out at the product marketing stage and the methods used to detect irra- diated foods.
In 2003, irradiation facilities had approval in eight Member States. All Member States except two provided the information requested with respect to food categories treated, quantities or doses.
In 2003, eleven Member States performed checks on foods placed on the market, whereas 4 did not perform analytical checks during the period covered. In total, about 5600 food samples have been checked in 2003. About 2,1 % of products (without dietary supplements) on the market were found to be irra- diated and not labelled. These products are herbs and spices or compound foods containing herbs and spices, frog legs, aquatic animal products, mushrooms, fresh fruits, tea, coffee, sauces and similar products. In 2003, special attention was brought to dietary supplements. It showed that this category of products should be particularly monitored — as 16 % of the products checked had been found irradiated.
On the basis of the available information, the Commission concludes that overall the situation has not changed much compared to 2002 even if the number of Member States carrying out controls has increased.
1. LEGAL BASIS AND BACKGROUND
According to Article 7 (3) of Directive 1999/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 February 1999 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning foods and food ingredi- ents treated with ionising radiation (1), the Member States shall forward to the Commission every year:
the results of checks carried out in the irradiation facilities, in particular regarding the categories and quan- tities of products treated and the dose administered
and
the results of checks carried out at the product marketing stage and the methods used to detect irradiated foods.
The Commission has to publish the results in annual reports in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This report covers the period from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2003.
Information on general aspects of food irradiation is available on the website of the Directorate-General Health and Consumer Protection of the European Commission (2).
1.1. Irradiation facilities
According to Article 3 (2) of Directive 1999/2/EC food may only be irradiated in approved irradiation facilities. For facilities in the EU, approval is given by the competent authorities of the Member States (2). The Member States have to inform the Commission about their approved irradiation facilities (Article 7 (1)).
(1) OJ L 66, 13.3.1999, p. 16. (2) http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/food/biosafety/irradiation/index_en.htm 23.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 230/13
The list of authorised facilities in the Member States has been published by the Commission (1).
1.2. Irradiated foods
The irradiation of dried aromatic herbs, spices and vegetable seasonings is authorised in the EU (Directive 1999/3/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 February 1999 on the establishment of a Community list of food and food ingredients treated with ionising radiation (2)). In addition, five Member States have notified that they maintain national authorisations for certain foods in accordance with Article 4 (4) of Directive 1999/2/EC. The list of national authorisations has been published by the Commission (3).
According to Article 6 of Directive 1999/2/EC, any irradiated food or any irradiated food ingredient of a compound food must be labelled with the words ‘irradiated’ or ‘treated with ionising radiation’.
For the enforcement of the correct labelling or to detect non-authorised products, several analytical methods have been standardised by the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN), following a mandate given by the European Commission.
2. RESULTS OF CHECKS CARRIED OUT IN THE IRRADIATION FACILITIES
The Member States submitted the following information:
2.1. Belgium
An inspection by the competent authority in 2003 confirmed compliance of the irradiation facility IBA Mediris S.A. with the requirements of Directive 1999/2/EC.
The following table provides the categories and quantities of foods irradiated in the company IBA Mediris in 2003.
Amount Food (t)
Shrimps 624,5
Frog's legs 2 501,5
Herbs, spices and vegetable seasonings 468,5
Frozen vegetables 144,1
Cheese 58
Eggs 419
Poultry/Game 915,5
Meat 159,4
Fish 289,5
Dried fruits 13,6
‘Pâtes de fruits’ 73,4
Starch 56,3
Proteins 37,1
Prepared dishes 167,5
Total 5 928
(1) OJ C 187, 7.8.2003, p. 13. (2) OJ L 66, 13.3.1999, p. 6. (3) OJ C 56, 11.3.2003, p. 5. C 230/14EN Official Journal of the European Union 23.9.2006
2.2. Germany
During the reporting period there were four approved irradiation facilities in Germany:
(a) Gamma Service Produktbestrahlung GmbH, Radeberg
The facility was inspected in 2002.
The following table provides the categories and quantities of foods that were irradiated at Gamma Service Produktbestrahlung GmbH in 2003, with the average absorbed doses.
Quantity Average absorbed dose Food (t) (kGy)
Oil seeds 1,5 <10
Dried vegetables 67 <10
Spices including blended spices 12,8 <10
Spices including blended spices and spice preparations 195,6 <10
Herbs 3,5 <10
Herbs 29 <10
Tea-like products 106 <10
Other (chitosan, powdered seaweed, bladderwrack, 1,5 4,5-12,1 barberries)
Total EU 16,3
Total Third countries 400,6
Total 416,9
(b) Beta-Gamma Service GmbH&Co. KG, Wiehl
The facility was approved on 15 August 2003. There were no further checks in 2003. The next inspec- tion was to be carried out in calendar week 13/2004.
The following table provides the categories and quantities of foods that were irradiated at Gamma Service GmbH&Co. KG in 2003, with the average absorbed doses.
Quantity Average absorbed dose Food [t] [kGy]
Vegetables Powdered horseradish 2,5 8,6
Celery, powdered horse- 1,77 6,2 radish
Fresh mushrooms Field mushrooms 1,89 6,4
Field mushrooms 0,936 6,2
Field mushrooms 2,736 6,3
Boletus luteus 1,005 10,0 23.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 230/15
Quantity Average absorbed dose Food [t] [kGy]
Mushroom products Granulated boletus luteus 1,2 6,6
Fresh vegetables Green peppers 8,283 10,8
Mixed vegetables 1,0 10,8
Celery 0,3 6,1
Spices Blended spices 2,55 10,0
Total 24,17
(c) Isotron Deutschland GmbH, Allershausen
The facility was inspected in 2002.
The following table provides the categories and quantities of foods that were irradiated at Isotron Deutschland GmbH in 2003, with the average absorbed doses.
Quantity Average absorbed dose Food [t] [kGy]
Dairy products 0,135 6
Tea, tea-like products 266,49 ≤ 10
Spices including blended spices and spice preparations 109,41 ≤ 10
3,49 ≤ 10
Herbs 49,68 ≤ 10
Total EU 3,49
Total Third countries 425,72
Total 429,21
(d) Gamma-Service GmbH&Co KG, Bruchsal
No food products were irradiated in the facility in 2003.
2.3. Denmark
The facility LR Plast has ceased irarrdiation activities 31 October 2003 and therefore it has been removed from the List of approved facilities for the treatment of foods and food ingredients with ionising radiation.
No inspections were carried in 2003.
2.4. Spain
The facility IONMED S.A. was approved for irradiation of foods in 2002.
No control has been carried out, the authorities have only foreseen a supervision of the self-inspection system. C 230/16EN Official Journal of the European Union 23.9.2006
The following table provides the category and the quantity of foods irradiated in the facility in 2003, with the overall average absorbed doses.
Overall average absorbed radia- Amount Food tion dose (t) (kGy)
Herbs, spices and vegetable seasonings 393,8 3-8
2.5. France
All the authorised facilities have been inspected in 2003.
The following table provides the categories and quantities of foods irradiated in France in 2003.
Overall average absorbed radia- Amount Food tion dose (t) (kGy)
Spices, vegetable seasonings and dehydrated vegetables 894 10
Frozen aromatic herbs 4 10
Dried fruits and vegetables 21 1
Cereal flakes for milk products 2 10
Arabic gum 141 3
Caseins, caseinates 15 6
Mechanically recovered meat, meat and offal of chicken 2 290 5
Frozen frog legs 1 006 5
Total 4 383
2.6. Italy
In Italy there is one facility approved for irradiation of foods.
No information has been forwarded by the Member State of the results of checks carried out in the facility.
2.7. The Netherlands
In the year 2003 the following inspections have been carried out in the Netherlands:
(a) Isotron facility in Ede:
— Inspection of HACCP system on 4 February; — General inspection on 14 May.
(b) Isotron facility in Etten Leur:
— Inspection of the HACCP system on 17 June. The following table provides the categories and quantities of foods irradiated in the two production facilities of Ede and Etten-Leur.
Amount Food (t)
Spices/Herbs 1 756,8
Dehydrated vegetables 2 191,2
Poultry meat (frozen) 95,2 23.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 230/17
Amount Food (t)
Shrimps (frozen) 196,8
Frog parts 184
Egg white (cooled) 359,2
Food (1) 781,6
Samples food 24,8
TOTAL 5 589,6
(1) Products intended for exports to third countries.
2.8. The United Kingdom
There is only one food irradiation facility in the UK, the Isotron plc facility at Swindon, which is licensed to irradiate certain herbs and spices. No food has been irradiated in 2003.
The facility was not inspected during 2003.
2.9. Summary for the EU
The notified amount of foods irradiated in the EU during the period covered is 17.164 tonnes. Part of this amount has been irradiated for export.
3. RESULTS OF CHECKS CARRIED OUT AT THE PRODUCT MARKETING STAGE AND THE METHODS USED TO DETECT IRRADIATED FOODS
The Member States submitted the following information:
3.1. Austria
100 samples were checked for ionising radiation treatment. Irradiation could be demonstrated in two samples of spiced herbal tea taken in connection with an inspection following a notification through the Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed. The products tested and numbers of samples are shown below:
Number of analysed samples
Food analysed Result: CEN method used Result: irradiated, non-irradiated not correctly labelled (origin)
Spices and herbs 45 0 EN 1788
Herbal tea (spiced) 13 2 EN 1788 (unknown origin)
Chicken 13 0 EN 1786
Turkey 2 0 EN 1786
Duck 12 0 EN 1786
Goose 7 0 EN 1786
TOTAL 92 2
Total in % of analysed samples 97,8 2,2 C 230/18EN Official Journal of the European Union 23.9.2006
3.2. Belgium
In 2003, 12 samples of frog's legs were analysed, 9 of them were found to be irradiated and not labelled. Also 25 samples of cheese were analysed, 5 of them were found to be irradiated and not labelled.
Number of analysed samples
Food analysed Result: CEN method used Result: irradiated, non-irradiated not correctly labelled (origin)
Frog's legs 12 9 EN 1785
Cheese 25 5 EN 1785
Total 37 14
Total in % of analysed samples 62,8 37,8
3.3. Germany
3634 food samples were examined of which 69 were found to be irradiated but not labelled. A high percentage of teas, tea like products and food supplements was found to be irradiated.
Number of analysed samples
Food analysed Result: CEN method used Result: irradiated, non-irradiated not correctly labelled (origin) (1)
Milk/dairy products 2 EN 1788
Herbal cheese and cheese 124 1 EN 1788, mod. (France) EN 1784 EN 1787 EN 1788
Herbal butter 22 EN 1787 EN 1788
Eggs and egg products 4 EN 1784 mod.
Meat (including frozen meat) 5 EN 1784 mod. but excluding poultry and EN 1786 game)
Meat products (excluding 65 EN 1784 mod. sausages) EN 1786 EN 1788
Sausages 102 EN 1784 mod. EN 1786 EN 1788
Poultry 233 EN 1784 mod. EN 1786 EN 1788 23.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 230/19
Number of analysed samples
Food analysed Result: CEN method used Result: irradiated, non-irradiated not correctly labelled (origin) (1)
Game 6 EN 1786
Fish and fisheries products 144 In all 8, of which: EN 1784 mod. 3 dried squid (Netherlands; EN 1786 Indian Ocean) EN 1788 1 dried sardines (Nether- lands; Indian Ocean) 4 (Thailand, imported via Netherlands)
Crustaceans, shellfish, mussels 248 3 EN 1784 mod. and other aquatic animals (Indonesia) EN 1786 including their products EN 1788 EN13751 L 12.01-1
Pulses 12 EN 1786 EN 1787 EN 1788 EN 13751 (Screening)
Soups, sauces 62 2 EN 1787 EN 1788
Cereals and cereal products 71 EN 1786 EN 1788
Oil seeds 10 EN 1787 EN 1788 EN 13751
Nuts 214 EN 1784 mod. EN 1786 EN 1788 EN 1787 EN 13751
Potatoes, parts of starch-rich 115 EN 1788 plants EN 13751 L 53.00-2
Fresh vegetables, salad 36 EN 1787 EN 1788 EN 13751
Dried vegetables, vegetable 67 EN 1787 products EN 1788 EN 13751 (Screening)
Mushrooms, fresh 49 EN 1788 C 230/20EN Official Journal of the European Union 23.9.2006
Number of analysed samples
Food analysed Result: CEN method used Result: irradiated, non-irradiated not correctly labelled (origin) (1)
Mushrooms, dried or mush- 163 2 EN 1787 room products (Germany) EN 1788 EN 13751 (Screening)
Fresh fruits 148 EN 1784 mod. EN 1786 EN 1787 EN 1788 EN 13751
Dried fruits or fruit products 83 EN 1786 EN 1787 EN 1788 EN 13708 EN 13751 (Screening) L 30.00-3
Cocoa powder 10 EN 1788
Coffee, raw 19 EN 1788
Teas, tea-like products 209 In all 18, of which: EN 1786 16 (Netherlands) EN 1787 EN 13751 (Screening)
Ready-to-serve meals 37 3 EN 1784 (1 Taiwan, 1 Thailand, EN 1787 1 Vietnam) EN 1788 EN 13751 (Screening)
Spices, including preparations 901 In all 23, of which: EN 1784 and seasoning salt 1 pepper (Madagascar) EN 1786 2 mixed herbs/paprika EN 1787 (Israel) EN 1788 2 (Germany) EN 13751 Remainder: of unknown (Screening) origin L 12.01-1 L 53.00-3
Herbs 357 1 EN 1784 EN 1786 EN 1787 EN 1788 EN 13751 (Screening)
Asian noodle snacks, party 5 EN 1787 snacks, pizza, TV snacks EN 1788 23.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 230/21
Number of analysed samples
Food analysed Result: CEN method used Result: irradiated, non-irradiated not correctly labelled (origin) (1)
Food supplements 78 8 EN 1786 EN 1788 EN 13751 (Screening)
Other 33 EN 1784 EN 1786 EN 1787 EN 1788
Total 3 634 69
Total in % of analysed samples 98,1 1,9
(1) Foods labelled as having been irradiated are not checked.
3.4. Denmark
In 2003 the Danish Veterinary and Food Administration (DFVA) examined herbal food supplements and herbal raw materials for food supplements. A total of 106 samples were taken from manufacturers and importers in Denmark. The results of analysis showed that 11 of them had been irradiated or contained irradiated ingredients. Another four showed signs of a minor ingredient that had been irradiated. None of the products examined bore a label mentioning irradiation.
In addition, Danish undertakings are themselves obliged to carry out checks to ensure that the rules are complied with. Their self-monitoring activities are verified by the DVFA through documentary checks.
In 2003, as in previous years, regular microbiological tests were also carried out on foodstuffs marketed in Denmark. However, the results gave no reason to suspect irradiation, and for this reason no samples were collected for analysis.
Number of samples analysed
Result: Food analysed strong probability Result: CEN methods used Result: that a minor ingre- irradiated, not irradiated dient contained in not properly the product had labelled been irradiated
Food supplements containing drugs, 91 4 11 EN 13783 and raw materials used to produce (screening) and them EN 1788 (verifi- cation)
Total 91 4 11
Total in % of analysed samples 85,8 3,8 10,4 C 230/22EN Official Journal of the European Union 23.9.2006
3.5. Spain
No analytical checks were performed in 2003.
3.6. Finland
There are two food authorities carrying out checks on the irradiation of foods:
— The National Food Agency in Finland included checks on the irradiation of foods at the product marketing stage in its programme for the official control of foodstuffs for the year 2003. The checks focused on seafood products. Altogether 30 samples of seafood products were analysed. No samples were found to contain irradiated material.
— The checks carried out by the Customs authorities focused on dried spices and herbs. A total of 141 samples of dried spices and herbs were analysed. Three spice samples were found to contain irradiated material. None of the three positive samples were adequately labelled.
Number of analysed samples
Food analysed Result: CEN method used Result: irradiated, non-irradiated not correctly labelled
Shrimps 9 0 EN13751 for screening purposes, confirmation by Other crayfish 6 0 EN1788
Mussels 8 0
Molluscs and shrimp mixes 2 0
Snails 4 0
Frog legs 1 0
Dried spices and herbs 141 3
Total 171 3
Total in % of analysed samples 98,3 1,7
3.7. France
As part of the control of units, a request was systematically made for an investigation to be carried out at the customers that used treated foodstuffs, in order to check compliance with the provisions on the label- ling of ionised foodstuffs.
A confectioner using ionised nuts and two enterprises using ionised mechanically recovered meat without mentioning this on the label were given formal notice to change their labelling.
No sampling of foodstuffs was carried out for 2003 at the product marketing stage in order to look for treatment with ionising radiation. 23.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 230/23
3.8. Greece
17 samples were taken and checked at the border. One sample of cocoa was found to be irradiated.
Number of analysed samples
Food analysed Result: CEN method used Result: irradiated, non-irradiated not correctly labelled
Tea — sage 1 0 EN13751
Herb — lime 1 0
Tea 2 0
Pepper 1 0
Chamomile 1 0
Basil 1 0
Mint 1 0
Dried onions 1 0
Herb-ash 1 0
Lavender 1 0
Rosemary 1 0
Cocoa 1 1
Herb — dog rose 1 0
Herb — couch grass 1 0
Aniseed 1 0
Total 16 1
Total in % of analysed samples 94,1 5,9
3.9. Italy
No analytical checks were performed in 2003.
3.10. Ireland
Checks on compliance with Directive 1999/2/EC are carried out by the Environmental Health Services and Public Analysts' Laboratories of the Health Boards, under Service Contract to the Food Safety Authority of Ireland. In 2003, a total of 357 samples were analysed: dried spices and herbs, food supplements, fresh strawberries and other products. A total of 12 samples (9 food supplements and 3 spices) were found to contain wholly or partially irradiated material. None of the 12 positive samples was labelled as irradiated. C 230/24EN Official Journal of the European Union 23.9.2006
Number of analysed samples
Food analysed Result: CEN method used Result: irradiated, non-irradiated not correctly labelled
Dried spices and herbs 228 3 (five-spice mix, 2 EN13751 for others) screening purposes, confirmation by Food supplements 77 9 (3 ginseng, 3 aloe EN1788 vera, ginger root, garlic, agnacast)
Fresh strawberries 18 0
Coffee, tea 9 0
Other 13 0
Total 345 12
Total in % of analysed samples 96,6 3,4
3.11. Luxembourg
No analytical checks were performed in 2003.
3.12. The Netherlands
Samples were taken in retail shops on the market. All analysis were carried out in the laboratory of the Inspectorate of Health Protection in Zutphen. In 2003, according to a planned programme 700 samples were taken and analysed according to the methods mentioned in the table. From these 700 samples, 37 samples proved to be irradiated. None of the irradiated samples were labelled as such. As a result, the producers received an official report for the offences. The results of all the analyses of the different products and the methods used are shown in table.
Number of analysed samples
Food analysed Result: CEN method used Result: irradiated, non-irradiated not correctly labelled
Strawberries 33 0 EN 1788
Mushrooms 62 3 EN 13751 EN 1788
Dietary supplements 162 25 EN 13751, EN 1788
Herbs and spices (prepacked) 461 4 EN 13751 EN 1788
Fish (dried) 5 5 EN 1788
Total 723 37
Total in % of analysed samples 95,1 4,9
3.13. Portugal
In 2003, eight samples of herbs, spices and seasonings were taken, and analysed by the method EN1787. None of them were found to be irradiated. 23.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 230/25
Number of analysed samples
Food analysed Result: CEN method used Result: irradiated, non-irradiated not correctly labelled
Herbs, spices and seasonings 8 0 EN 1787
Total 8 0
Total in % of analysed samples 100 0
3.14. Sweden
To uphold the knowledge of the method for analysis the National Food Administration Sweden has performed a control on irradiated food. During the year 2003 seven samples were taken. Five samples were taken in shops selling meat, mainly meat from birds, and two samples of cheese. The method used to analyse irradiated food is the method in European standard EN 1784.
The seven samples analysed were not irradiated.
3.15. The United Kingdom
The Food Standards Agency is aware of 415 products that were sampled by local enforcement authorities in 2003 and analysed using standardised detection tests for irradiated food. Of these 415 samples, 44 were found to be irradiated. It should be noted that 25 samples are reported as ‘inconclusive’ because they were identified as intermediate using CEN method EN13751:2002 and are inconclusive because they were not analysed further.
Irradiated dietary supplements were found on sale in the UK. Thirteen of the twenty-nine irradiated dietary supplements contained an irradiated component. In three of these thirteen, the irradiated component was minor and the irradiated ingredient was estimated at less than a few percent of the total product.
Number of analysed samples Food analysed CEN method used Result: Result: Result: non-irradiated Inconclusive irradiated,
Dried herbs and spices and vegetable 240 21 11 EN 13751:2002 seasonings EN 1788:2001
Chicken soup mix 1 0 0 EN 13751:2002
Strawberries 10 0 0 EN 13751:2002
Mushrooms and edible fungi 3 0 0 EN 13751:2002
Frog legs 1 0 0 EN 1786:1996
Herbal teas 6 3 0 EN 13751:2002
Seafood i.e. shellfish, prawns, shrimps 51 0 4 EN 13751:2002 and fish EN 1788:2001
Dietary supplements 34 1 29 (1) EN 13751:2002 EN 1788:2001
Total 346 25 44
Total in % of analysed samples 83,4 6 10,6
(1) Of the 29 irradiated dietary supplements, 13 contained an irradiated component. C 230/26EN Official Journal of the European Union 23.9.2006
3.16. Summary for the EU
The following table summarises the samples analysed and the results obtained for the whole EU:
Number of analysed samples
Member State Result: Result: irradiated, non-irradiated not correctly labelled
A922
B3714
D 3 634 69
DK 91 11
E——
FIN 171 3
F——
EL 16 1
I——
IRL 345 12
L——
NL 723 37
P80
S70
UK 346 44
Total 5 470 193
Total in % of analysed samples 96,5 3,5
4. CONCLUSIONS
4.1. Results of checks carried out in the irradiation facilities
Directive 1999/2/EC requires the Member States to inform the Commission about results of checks in irra- diation facilities, about the categories and quantities of foods irradiated and about the average doses applied.
In 2003, irradiation facilities had approval in eight Member States. All Member States except Italy and Denmark, were the facility has ceased irradiation activities during 2003, provided the information requested with respect to food categories treated, quantities or doses.
The notified amount of foods irradiated in the EU during 2003 is 17 164 tonnes.
4.2. Results of checks carried out at the product marketing stage
In 2003, 11 Member States performed analytical checks and submitted the requested data. Four Member States did not perform analytical checks during the period covered by the present report. Spain, Italy and Luxembourg have no analytical capability and France decided to perform no analytical check in 2003. 23.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 230/27
The situation in 2003 is similar to 2002. Few products on the market were found to be irradiated and not labelled (3,5 %). As regards dietary supplements, some Member States (DE, DK, IRL, NL et UK) decided to check this sector in particular, because of the high percentage of products found irradiated and not labelled in 2002 (29,5 %). In 2003, 524 samples have been controlled, 82 have been found irradiated (16 %). In total, about 5 000 food samples have been checked of which about 2,1 % (excluding the irradiated dietary supplements in the United Kingdom, Denmark, Ireland, Germany and the Netherlands) were irra- diated but not labelled. This is an increase of 0,7 % in comparison to 2002. This may be accounted for by a more targeted nature of the sampling and the fact that more Member States do now perform analytical checks.
4.3. Deadline for the submission of results of checks for the report 2004 The deadline for the submission of results of checks to the Commission performed in 2004, according to Article 7 (3) of Directive 1999/2/EC, is 30 April 2005. C 230/28EN Official Journal of the European Union 23.9.2006
Report from the Commission on food irradiation for the year 2004
(2006/C 230/08)
SUMMARY
Under Article 7(3) of Directive 1999/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 February 1999 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning foods and food ingredients treated with ionising radiation (1), the Member States have to forward to the Commission every year:
— the results of checks carried out in irradiation facilities, in particular regarding the categories and quan- tities of products treated and the dose administered
and
— the results of checks carried out at the product marketing stage and the methods used to detect irra- diated foods.
In 2004, irradiation facilities had approval in 10 Member States. 7 Member States provided the information requested with respect to food categories treated, quantities or doses. As a consequence, the precise amount of foods irradiated in the EU during 2004 is not known.
16 Member States reported checks on foods placed on the market. In total, 7169 food samples were checked in 2004. About 3,9 % of products on the market were found to be irradiated and not labelled. In particular, products imported from Asia, especially Asian-type noodles and dried prepared noodles, appear to be illegally irradiated.
Differences between Member States regarding the results of controls can partly be explained by the choice of samples and the performance of the analytical methods used.
1. Legal basis and background
Under Article 7(3) of Directive 1999/2/EC, the Member States are required to forward to the Commission every year:
— the results of checks carried out in irradiation facilities, in particular regarding the categories and quantities of products treated and the dose administered
and
— the results of checks carried out at the product marketing stage and the methods used to detect irradiated foods.
The Commission publishes the results in annual reports in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This report covers the period from 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2004.
Information on general aspects of food irradiation is available on the website of the European Commission's Directorate-General for Health and Consumer Protection2.
1.1. Irradiation facilities
Under Article 3(2) of Directive 1999/2/EC, food may be irradiated only in approved irradiation facil- ities. For facilities in the EU, approval is given by the competent authorities of the Member States (2). The Member States have to inform the Commission of their approved irradiation facilities (Article 7(1)).
The list of authorised facilities in the Member States has been published by the Commission (3).
(1) OJ L 66, 13.3.1999, p. 16. Amended by Regulation (EC) No 1882/2003 (OJ L 284, 31.10.2003, p. 1). (2) http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/food/biosafety/irradiation/index_en.htm. (3) OJ C 187, 7.8.2003, p. 13. 23.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 230/29
1.2. Irradiated foods
The irradiation of dried aromatic herbs, spices and vegetable seasonings is authorised in the EU (Directive 1999/3/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 February 1999 on the establishment of a Community list of food and food ingredients treated with ionising radiation (1)). In addition, 6 Member States have notified that they maintain national authorisations for certain foods in accordance with Article 4(4) of Directive 1999/2/EC. The list of national authorisations has been published by the Commission (2).
Under Article 6 of Directive 1999/2/EC, any irradiated food or any irradiated food ingredient of a compound food must be labelled with the words ‘irradiated’ or ‘treated with ionising radiation’.
To enforce correct labelling or to detect non-authorised products, several analytical methods have been standardised by the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN), following a mandate given by the European Commission.
2. Results of checks carried out in irradiation facilities
Details of the facilities in the Member states can be found at the Commission website:
http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/food/biosafety/irradiation/approved_facilities_en.pdf
The Member States submitted the following information:
2.1. Belgium
Inspections by the competent authorities in 2004 confirmed the compliance of the irradiation facility IBA Mediris S.A. with the requirements of Directive 1999/2/EC.
The following table shows the categories and quantities of foods irradiated in this facility in 2004.
Amount Food (t) (*)
Shrimps 685,7
Frog's legs 2 688,4
Herbs, spices and vegetable seasonings 496,0
Frozen vegetables 143,4
Cheese 26,6
Eggs 168,9
Poultry/Game 219,8
Meat 966,8
Fish 191,9
Dried fruits 2,8
Starch 112,5
Plasma 46,4
Prepared dishes 167,5
Total 5 776,6
(*) Amounts reported in kg.
(1) OJ L 66, 13.3.1999, p. 24. (2) OJ C 56, 11.3.2003, p. 5. C 230/30EN Official Journal of the European Union 23.9.2006
2.2. Czech Republic
Inspections by the competent authorities in 2004 confirmed the compliance of the irradiation facility Artim spol.s.r.o. with the requirements of Directive 1999/2/EC.
The following table shows the categories and quantities of foods irradiated in this facility in 2004.
Overall average absorbed Amount Food radiation dose (t) (KGy)
Dried aromatic herbs, spices and vegetable seasonings 460,3 5
Egg white 0,01 3
Total 460,8
2.3. Germany
During the reporting period, there were four approved irradiation facilities in Germany: (a) Gamma Service Produktbestrahlung GmbH, Radeberg Inspections by the competent authorities in 2004 confirmed the compliance of the irradiation facility with the requirements of Directive 1999/2/EC. The following table shows the categories and quantities of foods irradiated in this facility in 2004.
Quantity Average absorbed dose Food (t) (kGy)
Dried vegetables 3,3 <10
Herbs and seasonings 338,4 <10
Other foodstuffs (guarana seed) 0,7 <10
Total 342,4
(b) Beta-Gamma Service GmbH&Co. KG, Wiehl Inspections by the competent authorities in 2004 confirmed the compliance of the irradiation facility with the requirements of Directive 1999/2/EC. The following table shows the categories and quantities of foods irradiated in this facility in 2004.
Quantity Average absorbed dose Food [t] [kGy]
Granulated slippery jack mushroom 1,20 6,6
Plant raw materials (parsley, dill, cilantro) 2,50 6,3
Powdered spinach 4,32 6,5
Powdered celery/horse radish 3,00 6,6
Parsley 13,00 5,2
Total 24,02 23.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 230/31
(c) Isotron Deutschland GmbH, Allershausen
Inspections by the competent authorities in 2004 confirmed the compliance of the irradiation facility with the requirements of Directive 1999/2/EC.
The following table shows the categories and quantities of foods irradiated in this facility in 2004.
Quantity Average absorbed dose Food [t] [kGy]
Seasonings 53 7-9
Herbs 440 7-9
Total 429,21
(d) Gamma-Service GmbH&Co KG, Bruchsal
No food products were irradiated in this facility in 2004.
2.4. Spain
In Spain, there are two facilities approved for the irradiation of foods.
No information has been forwarded by this Member State on the results of checks carried out in the facilities.
2.5. France
In France, there are seven facilities approved for the irradiation of foods.
Inspections by the competent authorities in 2004 confirmed the compliance of the irradiation facility with the requirements of Directive 1999/2/EC.
The following table shows the categories and quantities of foods irradiated in the facilities in 2004.
Quantity Average absorbed dose Food [t] [kGy]
Herbs, spices and vegetable seasonings 203 10
Frozen herbs 1 10
Dried vegetables and fruits 2 1
Gum arabic 28 3
Casein, caseinates 54 6
Mechanically recovered poultry meat, offal of poultry 635 5
Frozen frog legs 813 5
Shrimps 20
Total 1 802 C 230/32EN Official Journal of the European Union 23.9.2006
2.6. Hungary
In Hungary, there is one facility approved for the irradiation of foods.
No information has been forwarded by this Member State on the results of checks carried out in the facility.
2.7. Italy
In Italy, there is one facility approved for the irradiation of foods.
No information has been forwarded by this Member State on the results of checks carried out in the facility.
2.8. The Netherlands
In the Netherlands, there are two facilities approved for the irradiation of foods.
During 2004, a general inspection of the Isotron facility in Ede was organised. The facility in Etten- Leur was only inspected for HACCP. No information has been forwarded on the results of the inspections carried out.
The following table shows the categories and quantities of foods irradiated in the facilities in 2004.
Quantity Products in 2004 [t] (*)
Spices/Herbs 1 638,4
Dehydrated vegetables 1 088
Poultry meat (frozen) 23,2
Shrimps (frozen) 284,8
Frog parts 64
Egg white (cooled) 1,6
Food (**) 1 647,2
Samples food 21,6
Total 4 768,8
(*) The amounts have been reported as ‘boards’ with an average weight per board of 800 kg. (**) Products intended for exports to third countries.
2.9. Poland
In Poland, there are two facilities approved for the irradiation of foods: 23.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 230/33
The installation of the Institute of Applied Radiation Chemistry Technical University of Lodz was inspected by the State Sanitary Inspection and in compliance with EU Directive 1999/2/CE.
The following tables shows the categories and quantities of foods irradiated in the facilities in 2004.
1. Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and technology, Warsaw
Quantity Average absorbed dose Food [t] [kGy]
Spices, Herbs, dehydrated vegetables 619,3 7
Dried mushrooms 61,4 5-7
Total 680,7 1
2. Institute of Applied Radiation Chemistry Technical university of Lodz.
Quantity Average absorbed dose Food [t] [kGy]
Spices 47,8 8
Total 47,8
2.10. The United Kingdom
In the United Kingdom, there is one facility approved for the irradiation of foods.
The facility (reference EW/04) was inspected by the Food Standards Agency in December 2004. The facility complied with its licence and with the requirements of Directive 1999/2/EC.
No food was irradiated under licence in the UK in 2004.
2.11. Summary for the EU
10 Member States, including 3 new Member States, have facilities approved in accordance with Article 7(2) of Directive 1999/2/EC.
Only 4 Member States forwarded to the Commission the results of checks carried out in irradiation facilities. Spain, Hungary and Italy did not provide such information.
The exact amount of foodstuffs irradiated in the Union cannot thus be determined. C 230/34EN Official Journal of the European Union 23.9.2006
3. Results of checks carried out at the product marketing stage and the methods used to detect irradiated foods
The Member States submitted the following information:
3.1. Austria
118 samples were checked for ionising radiation treatment. Irradiation was confirmed in one sample of dried fish, taken in connection with an inspection following a notification through the RASFF.
Number of analysed samples: 118 Food analysed CEN method used Result: irradiated, not Result: non-irradiated correctly labelled
Basil 2 0 EN 1788 EN 13751
Chilli 2 0 EN 1788 EN 13751
Cloves 1 0 EN 1788 EN 13751
Marjoram 4 0 EN 1788 EN 13751
Oregano 4 0 EN 1788 EN 13751
Paprika 7 0 EN 1788 EN 13751
Pepper 10 0 EN 1788 EN 13751
Peppermint 1 0 EN 1788 EN 13751
Rosemary 4 0 EN 1788 EN 13751
Herbal tea (spiced) 34 0 EN 1788 EN 13751
Thyme 5 0 EN 1788 EN 13751
Chicken 14 0 EN 1786
Turkey 3 0 EN 1786
Duck 15 0 EN 1786
Goose 11 0 EN 1786
Dried fish 1 1 EN 1785
TOTAL 117 1
Total in % of analysed samples 99 1 23.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 230/35
3.2. Belgium
In total, 225 samples were analysed. None were found to be irradiated.
Number of analysed samples: 225
Food analysed Result: irradiated, not CEN method used Result: non-irradiated correctly labelled (origin)
Frozen peeled or decapitated shrimps 40 0 EN 1785
Dried herbs and spices 44 0 EN 1785
Mechanically recovered poultry meat 23 0 EN 1785
Fresh strawberries 27 0 EN 1785
Grated cheese 42 0 EN 1785
Total 225 0
Total in % of analysed samples 100 0
3.3. Cyprus
No analytical checks were performed in 2004.
3.4. Czech Republic
In total, 17 samples were analysed. 1 sample of herbal tea was positive for irradiation and was not correctly labelled.
Number of analysed samples: 17 Food analysed CEN method used Result: irradiated, not Result: non-irradiated correctly labelled
Spices 8 0 EN 13751 EN 1788
Herbal tea products 3 1 EN 13751 EN 1788
Food supplements 5 0 EN 13751 EN 1788
Total 16 1
Total in % of analysed samples 94 6
3.5. Germany
4302 food samples were examined. 74 of these, i.e. 1,7 % on average, were non-compliant: 62 samples were incorrectly labelled and 12 were found to have been illegally irradiated. C 230/36EN Official Journal of the European Union 23.9.2006
The infringements are distributed very unevenly over product categories. In the group ‘Asian noodle snacks, party snacks, pizza, TV snacks’, 5 of 14 samples (36 %) had been irradiated and were not correctly labelled. The same was true for 18 % of dried prepared meals.
It should be noted that products from Asia accounted for most of the non-compliant samples.
Number of analysed samples: 4302
Food analysed Result: irradiated, not CEN method used Result: non-irradiated correctly labelled (*) (origin)
Milk/milk products 52 0 EN 1788 EN 1787 EN 1784 EN 1785
Cheese with herbs 57 0 EN 1788 EN 1784 EN 1787
Butter with herbs 28 0 EN 1787 EN 1788
Eggs, egg products 6 0 EN 1784 mod.
Meat (including frozen meat, except 11 0 EN 1784 mod. poultry, game) EN 1786
Meat products (except sausages) 31 1 (*) EN 1786 (Vietnam) EN 1788
Sausages 69 0 EN 1784 mod. EN 1786 EN 1788 EN 1787
Poultry 124 0 EN 1784 EN 1786
Game 12 0 EN 1786 EN 1784
Fish and fisheries products 76 4 (*) EN 1784 (Thailand) EN 1786 EN 1788
Crustaceans, shellfish, mussels and other 227 2 (*) EN 1786 aquatic animals including their products EN 1788 L 12.01-1
Pulses 40 0 EN 1787 EN 1788 EN 13751 (Screening)
Soups, sauces 69 3 EN 1787 EN 1788 EN 13751
Cereals and cereal products 68 EN 1787 EN 1788 EN 13751 23.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 230/37
Number of analysed samples: 4302
Food analysed Result: irradiated, not CEN method used Result: non-irradiated correctly labelled (*) (origin)
Oil seeds 83 0 EN 1784 EN 1787 EN 1788 EN 13751
Nuts 307 0 EN 1784 mod. EN 1786 EN 1787 EN 1788 EN 13751
Potatoes, parts of plants with high 37 0 EN 1787 content of starch EN 13751 EN 1788
Fresh vegetables, salad 86 0 EN 1787 EN 1788 EN 13751
Dried vegetables, vegetable products 112 2 (*) EN 1787 (China, powdered EN 1788 spinach) EN 13751 (Screening)
Mushrooms, fresh 79 0 EN 1788 EN 13751
Mushrooms, dried or mushroom products 281 3 + 2 (*) EN 1787 (Asia, Italy, EN 1788 Germany) EN 13751 (Screening)
Fresh fruits 192 1 (*) EN 1784 mod. EN 1784 EN 1787 EN 1788 EN 13751
Dried fruits or fruit products 213 0 EN 1787 EN 1788 EN 13708 EN 13751 L 30.00-3
Coffee, raw 15 0 EN 1788
Teas, tea-like products 291 0 EN 1788 EN 1787 EN 13751 EN 13751 (Screening)
Ready-to-serve meals 8 0 EN 1786 EN 1787 EN 1788
Spices, including preparations and 1 268 34 EN 1786 seasoning salt EN 1787 EN 1788 EN 13751 EN 13751 (Screening) EN 13788 C 230/38EN Official Journal of the European Union 23.9.2006
Number of analysed samples: 4302
Food analysed Result: irradiated, not CEN method used Result: non-irradiated correctly labelled (*) (origin)
Herbs 171 2 EN 1787 EN 1788 EN 13751 EN 13788
Dry prepared meals 73 13 EN 1787 (Vietnam, Taiwan, EN 1788 Turkey, Germany) EN 13751
Asian noodle snacks, party snacks, pizza, 9 5 EN 1787 TV snacks EN 1788
Food supplements 90 2 EN 1784 mod. EN 1787 EN 1788 EN 13751 EN 13751 (Screening)
Other 43 EN 1787 EN 1788
Total 4 228 74
Total in % of analysed samples 98 2
(*) Labelled as irradiated, though irradiation not permitted.
3.6. Denmark
The Danish Veterinary and Food Administration (DVFA) examined 53 samples herbal food supple- ments and herbal raw materials for food supplements. 3 samples had been irradiated or contained irradiated ingredients. Non of them were correctly labelled in relation to irradiation.
Number of samples analysed: 53 Food analysed CEN methods used Result: irradiated, not Result: not irradiated properly labelled
Herbal food supplements and herbal raw 50 3 EN 13783 (screening) materials for food supplements and EN 1788 (verification)
Total 50 3
Total in % of analysed samples 94 6
3.7. Estonia
No analytical checks were performed in 2004. 23.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 230/39
3.8. Greece
In total, 76 samples were analysed. The 5 positive samples were food supplements. No information was given about the labelling of these samples.
Number of analysed samples: 76 Food analysed CEN method used Result: non-irradiated Result: irradiated
Dried spices and herbs 34 0 EN 13751
Food supplements 30 5 EN 13751
Cocoa 11 0 EN 13751
Fish 1 0 EN 13751
Total 71 5
Total in % of analysed samples 93 7
3.9. Spain
No information has been forwarded by this Member State on the results of checks carried out at the marketplace.
3.10. Finland
Altogether, 309 samples were analysed. Of the 297 samples of dried spices and herbs analysed, 84 samples were found to contain irradiated material. Most of these were spice mixtures in instant noodle packages imported from China and other Asian countries.
A total of 12 food supplements were analysed and 8 were found to contain irradiated material.
Number of analysed samples: 309 Food analysed CEN method used Result: irradiated, not Result: non-irradiated correctly labelled
Dried spices and herbs 213 84 EN 13751 EN 1788
Food supplements 4 8 EN 13751 EN 1788
Total 217 92
Total in % of analysed samples 70 30
3.11. France
In total, 60 samples, most of them spices were analysed. None were found to be irradiated. C 230/40EN Official Journal of the European Union 23.9.2006
3.12. Hungary
In total, 134 samples were analysed. 2 samples of herbs were positive for irradiation, one of which was not correctly labelled.
Number of analysed samples: 134 Food analysed CEN method used Result: non-irradiated Result: irradiated (*)
Herbs 117 2 EN 1788
Tea 15 0 EN 1788
Total 132 2
Total in % of analysed samples 99 1
(*) One sample was not correctly labelled.
3.13. Ireland
In total, 586 samples were analysed of which 9 were confirmed to be irradiated.
Number of analysed samples: 586 Food analysed CEN method used Result: irradiated, not Result: non-irradiated correctly labelled
Chicken sausages 1 0 EN 13751 EN 1788 Prawns 10 0
Soups, broths and sauces 43 2
Cereal and bakery products 7 1
Fruit and vegetables 79 0
Herbs, spices and seasonings 342 3
Coffee and tea 23 2
Seeds 62 1
Foods intended for special nutritional uses 1 0
Food supplements 7 0
Total 577 9
Total in % of analysed samples 98 2
3.14. Italy
No information has been forwarded by this Member State on the results of checks carried out at the marketplace.
3.15. Latvia
No analytical checks were performed in 2004. 23.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 230/41
3.16. Lithuania
2 samples were tested: 1 sample of laurel leaves and 1 sample of green tea. Both were negative.
Documentary checks of dried aromatic herbs, spices and vegetable seasonings in 300 food stores were performed, but no information about the possible treatment of these dried aromatic herbs, spices and vegetable seasonings with ionising radiation was obtained.
3.17. Luxembourg
In total, 50 samples were analysed, none of which tested positive for irradiation
Number of analysed samples: 50 Food analysed CEN method used Result: non-irradiated Result: irradiated
Spices 10 0 EN 1788
Potatoes 10 0 EN 1788
Tea 10 0 EN 1788
Crustaceans: Prawn 10 0 EN 1788
Onion 10 0 EN 1788
Total 50 0
Total in % of analysed samples 100 0
3.18. Malta
No analytical checks were performed in 2004.
3.19. The Netherlands
In total, 430 samples were taken in the marketplace and analysed for irradiation. Of these 430 samples, 45 proved to be irradiated. Only 2 of the irradiated samples were correctly labelled as such. No indication of the origin of the positive samples was given.
Number of analysed samples: 430 Food analysed CEN method used Result: non-irradiated Result: irradiated (*)
Dietary supplements 165 38 EN 13751 EN 1788
Spices and herbs 220 7 EN 13751 EN 1788
Total 385 45
Total in % of analysed samples 90 10
(*) Two of the samples were correctly labelled. C 230/42EN Official Journal of the European Union 23.9.2006
3.20. Poland
In total, 121 samples were analysed. 7 samples tested positive for irradiation, none of which were correctly labelled.
Number of analysed samples: 121 Food analysed CEN method used Result: irradiated, not Result: non-irradiated correctly labelled
Dried herbs, spices and vegetable season- 60 6 EN 1788 ings (Singapore, India)
Potatoes 2 0 EN 1788
Onion and garlic 13 0 EN 1788
Poultry 7 0 EN 1788
Unshelled nuts 24 1 EN 1788
Prawns, fish 8 0 EN 1788
Total 114 7
Total in % of analysed samples 94 6
3.21. Portugal
No information has been forwarded by this Member State on the results of checks carried out at the marketplace.
3.22. Sweden
No analytical checks were performed in 2004.
3.23. Slovakia
In total, 10 samples comprising sunflower seed, hazelnuts, peanuts and almonds were tested with the GC method EN 1784. The results indicate that none of the samples were irradiated.
3.24. Slovenia
No analytical checks were performed in 2004.
3.25. The United Kingdom
In total, 676 products were sampled by UK local enforcement authorities and analysed using stan- dardised detection tests for irradiated food. Of these 676 samples, 40 (6 %) were found to be irra- diated. The 33 samples reported as ‘inconclusive’ were identified as intermediate using CEN method EN13751:2002, and were not analysed further, or were samples of 'low sensitivity' such that the mineral grain fraction of the samples was insufficient to carry out accurate analysis. 23.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 230/43
Number of analysed samples: 676 Food analysed CEN method used Result: non-irradiated Result: irradiated
Dried herbs, spices and vegetable 333 10 EN13751:2002; seasonings EN 1778:2001
Dried ready meals 30 14 EN13751:2002; EN 1778:2001
Couscous and dried seasonings 0 1 EN13751:2002; EN 1778:2001
Dried soup mixes 5 0 EN13751:2002
Noodles and dried seasoningsA 18 12 EN13751:2002; EN 1778:2001
Tortillas and dried seasonings 2 0 EN13751:2002
Rice and dried seasonings 2 0 EN13751:2002
Pasta and dried seasonings 2 1 EN13751:2002; EN 1778:2001
Mushrooms and edible fungi (dried and 4 1 EN13751:2002; fresh) EN 1778:2001
Dried fruit 47 0 EN13751:2002
Fresh fruit 17 0 EN13751:2002
Vegetables including onions 10 0 EN13751:2002
Herbal teas 21 0 EN13751:2002; EN 1778:2001
Seafood, i.e. shellfish, prawns, shrimps 40 0 EN13751:2002; and fish EN 1778:2001
Dried food ingredientsB 4 0 EN13751:2002
Nuts 1 0 EN13751:2002
Food supplements 96 15 EN13751:2002; EN 1778:2001
Total 636 40
Total in % of analysed samples 94 6 — C 230/44EN Official Journal of the European Union 23.9.2006
3.26. Summary for the EU
The following table summarises the samples analysed and the results obtained for the EU as a whole:
Number of samples non- Number of samples % of samples irradiated, not Member State irradiated irradiated correctly labelled
AT 117 1 1
BE 225 0 0
CY NAC NAC NAC
CZ 16 1 6
DE 4228 74 2
DK 50 3 6
EE NAC NAC NAC
EL 71 5 7
ES NI NI NI
FI 217 92 30
FR 60 0 0
HU 132 2 (*) 1
IE 577 9 0
IT NI NI NI
LV NAC NAC NAC
LT 2 0 0
LU 50 0 0
MT NAC NAC NAC
NL 385 45 (*) 10
PL 114 7 6
PT NI NI NI
SE NAC NAC NAC
SK 10 0 0
SI NAC NAC NAC
UK 636 40 6
Total 6 890 279 3,9
NI: No information has been forwarded by the Member State NAC: No analytical checks were performed in 2004. (*) Hungary and the Netherlands, respectively, found 1 and 2 samples that were irradiated and correctly labelled. 23.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 230/45
4. Conclusions 4.1. Results of checks carried out in irradiation facilities Directive 1999/2/EC requires the Member States to inform the Commission about the results of checks in irradiation facilities, the categories and quantities of foods irradiated and the average doses applied. In 2004, irradiation facilities had approval in 10 Member States. Compared to 2003, facilities in 3 new Member States were added to the list of approved facilities in the Member States. Only 7 of the 10 Member States provided the information requested with respect to the food cate- gories treated. Due this incomplete reporting, the precise amount of foods irradiated in the EU during 2004 is not known.
4.2. Results of checks carried out at the product marketing stage In 2004, 16 Member States performed analytical checks and submitted the requested data. 6 Member States informed the Commission that they did not perform analytical checks during the period covered by the present report. The information submitted shows that during 2004, 3,9 % of samples were irradiated and not correctly labelled. The infringements are unevenly distributed over product categories. Products imported from Asia, especially Asian-type noodles and dried prepared noodles, are particularly concerned. In addition, it should be noted that in 2004, there were no facilities in Asia approved by the European Com- munity. The Commission expects that the numbers of checks on these products will be increased in all Member States and that Member States will take the appropriate measures. Differences between Member States regarding the results of controls could partly be explained by the choice of the samples and the performance of the analytical methods used.
4.3. Deadline for the submission of the results of checks for the 2005 report The deadline for submitting to the Commission the results of checks performed in 2005, as required under Article 7(3) of Directive 1999/2/EC, is 30 April 2006. C 230/46EN Official Journal of the European Union 23.9.2006
EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK
Supplementary Code of Ethical Criteria for the members of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank (in accordance with Article 11(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Central Bank)
(2006/C 230/09)
1. Preliminary statements
On 10 October 2000, the Executive Board adopted the Code of Conduct of the European Central Bank. It gives guidance and sets ethical conventions, standards and benchmarks for all persons employed by the European Central Bank (ECB) as well as the members of the ECB's Executive Board. On 16 May 2002, the members of the Executive Board as members of the Governing Council agreed on the Code of Conduct for the members of the Governing Council. This Supplementary Code of Ethical Criteria (hereinafter the ‘Code’) further specifies the ethical regime applicable to the members of the Executive Board.
2. Gifts or other financial benefits
Members of the Executive Board should not accept gifts or financial benefits which are in any way related to the tasks and duties conferred upon them, in excess of a customary or negligible value. In this respect, gifts of a value not exceeding EUR 100 may be retained. If a particular situation does not allow a gift of a value exceeding EUR 100 to be rejected, the gift must be handed over to the ECB unless any excess above EUR 100 is paid to the ECB.
Members of the Executive Board may make gifts to third parties at the ECB's expense exceeding the limits foreseen in the rules for staff members. If a gift exceeds three times this amount, the Executive Board's authorisation is required. Members of the Executive Board should neither entertain each other, including spouses, partners or family members, nor give any other benefits to the aforementioned at the ECB's expense.
3. Acceptance of invitations
Members of the Executive Board, while keeping in mind their obligation to respect the principle of inde- pendence and avoid conflicts of interest, may accept invitations to conferences, receptions or cultural events and connected entertainment, including appropriate hospitality, if their participation in the event is compatible with the fulfilment of their duties or is in the ECB's interest. In this respect, they may accept the payment by the organisers of travel and accommodation cost commensurate with the duration of their commitment. In particular, members of the Executive Board may accept invitations to widely attended events, while they should observe particular prudence with regard to individual invitations. Any fees which may be accepted by the members of the Executive Board for lectures and speeches undertaken in their offi- cial capacity shall be used by the ECB for charitable purposes.
These rules should apply equally to their spouses or partners, if the invitations are also extended to them and if their participation is consistent with internationally accepted custom.
4. Acceptance of remuneration for activities undertaken in a personal capacity
Members of the Executive Board may undertake teaching and scholarly activities as well as other non- profit activities. They may accept remuneration and the reimbursement of expenses for such activities, undertaken in their personal capacity and not involving the ECB, subject to the conditions laid down in Article 11(1) of the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank and provided that this remuneration and these expenses are commensurate with the work performed and remain within customary limits. They should annually notify in writing the President of the ECB both of any activities they have performed in a personal capacity and of any resulting remuneration. 23.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 230/47
5. Compliance with rules on insider trading Members of the Executive Board are subject to the comprehensive compliance rules on insider trading and the monitoring regime in force at the ECB. They are strongly recommended to place their investments under the control of one or more recognised portfolio managers with full discretion. This recommendation does not apply to current accounts, deposits accounts, saving accounts and money market funds or comparable short term instruments. This recommendation is also without prejudice to the possibility to occasionally mobilise funds for the purchase of certain goods or for investing in real estate. In case of doubt, members of the Executive Board should seek the opinion of the ECB's Ethics Adviser.
6. Ethics Adviser In order to ensure a consistent application of this Code, members of the Executive Board should, in case of doubt about the practical application of any ethical criterion laid down in this Code, consult the ECB's Ethics Adviser.
7. Distribution and publication Made in one original copy, deposited in the vaults of the ECB. A copy has been distributed to each Execu- tive Board member.
Done at Frankfurt am Main, 5 September 2006.
The President of the ECB Jean-Claude TRICHET C 230/48EN Official Journal of the European Union 23.9.2006
European Defence Agency
Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2005
(2006/C 230/10)
The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address: http://www.eda.europa.eu/finance