DOCSLIB.ORG

I UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, MERCED Fine Particulate Matter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
I UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, MERCED Fine Particulate Matter i UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, MERCED Fine Particulate Matter and Wildland Fire Smoke: Integrating Air Quality, Fire Management, and Policy in the California Sierra Nevada A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Donald Schweizer in Environmental Systems Committee Members: Professor Ricardo Cisneros, Advisor Professor Samuel Traina, Chair Professor Teamrat A. Ghezzehei Professor Glenn Shaw 2016 ii Portion of Chapter 2 © 2016 Elsevier Limited Portion of Chapter 3 © 2014 Elsevier Limited Portion of Chapter 5 © 2016 Springer All other chapters © 2016 Donald Schweizer iii The dissertation of Donald Schweizer is hereby approved: Ricardo Cisneros, Advisor Date Teamrat A. Ghezzehei Date Glenn Shaw Date Samuel Traina, Chair Date iv Table of Contents List of abbreviations ....................................................................................................................... vi List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ vii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................... x Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... xi Curriculum Vitae ........................................................................................................................... xii Abstract ......................................................................................................................................... xiv Chapter 1.0 Smoke in the Sierra Nevada ..................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1.1 Smoke ecology ..................................................................................................... 2 Chapter 1.2 Smoke and human health ..................................................................................... 3 Chapter 1.3 Smoke and fine particulate matter in the Sierra Nevada ...................................... 5 Chapter 1.4 Fire management policy ....................................................................................... 7 Chapter 1.5 Air management policy ...................................................................................... 10 Chapter 1.6 Objectives .......................................................................................................... 12 Chapter 2.0 Limitations of agreement ....................................................................................... 14 Chapter 2.1 A comparative analysis of temporary and permanent beta attenuation monitors: The importance of understanding data and equipment limitations when creating PM 2.5 air quality health advisories. ........................................................................................................... 16 Abstract .................................................................................................................................. 16 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 17 Methods ................................................................................................................................. 18 Results .................................................................................................................................... 21 Discussion .............................................................................................................................. 30 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................ 32 Chapter 3.0 Smoke impacts from wildland fire managed for ecological benefit ...................... 34 Chapter 3.1 Wildland fire management and air quality in the southern Sierra Nevada: using the Lion Fire as a case study with a multi-year perspective on PM 2.5 impacts and fire policy .. 35 Abstract .................................................................................................................................. 35 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 36 Material and methods ............................................................................................................. 42 Results .................................................................................................................................... 46 Discussion .............................................................................................................................. 54 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................ 58 v Chapter 4.0 Smoke impacts from suppression versus ecologically beneficial wildland fires on public health over multiple years at a single site ........................................................................... 59 Chapter 4.1 Managed wildland fire as an option for smoke mitigation to air quality in the California Sierra Nevada by the reduction of landscape level megafire impacts to federal health standards for fine particulate matter. ........................................................................... 61 Abstract .................................................................................................................................. 61 Background ............................................................................................................................ 62 Methods ................................................................................................................................. 64 Results .................................................................................................................................... 68 Discussion .............................................................................................................................. 83 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................ 84 Chapter 5.0 Conclusions and policy recommendations ............................................................. 86 Chapter 5.1 Forest fire policy: change conventional thinking of smoke management to prioritize long-term air quality and public health ...................................................................... 87 Abstract .................................................................................................................................. 87 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 88 The Sierra Nevada of California Example ............................................................................. 89 Wider Policy Suggestions ...................................................................................................... 90 Chapter 5.2 Conclusions ........................................................................................................ 92 Bibliography .................................................................................................................................. 94 vi List of abbreviations APCD Air Pollution Control District AQI Air Quality Index BAM Met One, Inc. Beta-attenuation Monitor CAA the Clean Air Act CARB California Air Resources Board EBAM Met One, Inc. Environmental Beta-attenuation Monitor EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency FEM Federal Equivalency Method FLM Federal Land Manager FRM Federal Reference Method HMS Hazard Mapping System Fire and Smoke Product HYSPLT Hybrid Single Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory Model MODIS Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NASA United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NPS National Park Service, Department of the Interior PM 2.5 Fine particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in aerodynamic diameter RAWS Remote Automatic Weather Station SIP State Implementation Plan USFS United States Forest Service, Department of Agriculture WUI Wildland urban interface vii List of Figures Figure 1.1. 2011 Lion Fire temporary smoke monitoring with environmental beta-attenuation monitor (EBAM) and permanent beta-attenuation monitor (BAM) sites managed by the U.S. Forest Service (USFS), National Park Service (NPS), and the California Air Resources Board (CARB). ........................................................................................................................................... 6 Figure 1.2. 1940s era U.S. Forest Service public campaign likens forest fires to death and destruction. ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Figure 1.3. California air districts and 2013 federal and state attainment for fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ). ........................................................................................................................................... 11 Figure 2.1 Environmental beta attenuation monitor (EBAM) versus beta attenuation monitor (BAM) side by side comparative measurements for hourly (a and b)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2017 Schaeffer Fire Sequoia National Forest, an Assessment of Fuels And
    2017 Schaeffer Fire Sequoia National Forest An Assessment of Fuels and Fire Behavior July 24, 2017 Prepared by: Fire Behavior Assessment Team (FBAT) Alicia Reiner, Enterprise Program, [email protected], Jennifer Anderson, Pacific Southwest Region Carol Ewell, Stanislaus National Forest Amy Ziegler, Six Rivers National Forest Summit Wildland Fire Module, Stanislaus National Forest Sequoia Wildland Fire Module, Sequoia National Forest Acknowledgements: We thank the people who dedicate their energy and careers to land and fire management with the Forest Service and other agencies. The firefighters FBAT has had the opportunity to work with on this assignment and others, not only inspire us to continue navigating the difficulties inherent to keeping FBAT operational, but also give us hope that our land management agencies and fire organizations will continue to improve and provide high quality land and fire management into the future. We thank the CA Central Coast Incident Management Team for supporting FBAT logistically and allowing us to accomplish monitoring work on this fire. We thank the Division Supervisors and other resources we worked with for working with us to access portions of the fire safely. We thank the Sequoia National Forest and Kern River Ranger District, for welcoming FBAT to their unit. A final thanks is to all members and supporters of FBAT, current and past, who have made this program, and the learning which comes from it, possible. 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wildfires from Space
    Wildfires from Space More Lessons from the Sky Satellite Educators Association http://SatEd.org This is an adaptation of an original lesson plan developed and published on-line by Natasha Stavros at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. The original problem set and all of its related links is available from this address: https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/edu/teach/activity/fired-up-over-math-studying-wildfires-from-space/ Please see the Acknowledgements section for historical contributions to the development of this lesson plan. This spotlight on the “Wildfires from Space” lesson plan was published in November 2016 in More Lessons from the Sky, a regular feature of the SEA Newsletter, and archived in the SEA Lesson Plan Library. Both the Newsletter and the Library are freely available on-line from the Satellite Educators Association (SEA) at this address: http://SatEd.org. Content, Internet links, and materials on the lesson plan's online Resources page revised and updated in October 2019. SEA Lesson Plan Library Improvement Program Did you use this lesson plan with students? If so, please share your experience to help us improve the lesson plan for future use. Just click the Feedback link at http://SatEd.org/library/about.htm and complete the short form on-line. Thank you. Teaching Notes Wildfires from Space Invitation Wildfire is a global reality, and with the onset of climate change, the number of yearly wildfires is increasing. The impacts range from the immediate and tangible to the delayed and less obvious. In this activity, students assess wildfires using remote sensing imagery.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire and Water
    Fire and Water: An Emerging Nexus in California << THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK >> A Report by the 2019 Water Education Foundation Water Leaders Water Education Foundation 2019 Water Leaders: Jonathan Abelson Erica Bishop Dominic Bruno Greg Bundesen Daniel Constable DeDe Cordell Andrew Garcia Jenifer Gee Cheyanne Harris Julia Hart Levi Johnson Kevin Kasberg Megan Maurino Danielle McPherson Maya Mouawad Tara Paul Geeta Persad Adriana Renteria Ivy Ridderbusch Gokce Sencan Melissa Sparks-Kranz Sarah Sugar Andrea Zimmer Acknowledgements and Thanks: The 2019 Water Leaders Class would like to thank the Water Education Foundation for providing us with this unique opportunity. We would also like to express our gratitude to each of the mentors that shared their invaluable time and insights. Finally, we would like to thank the supporters of the Water Education Foundation and the William R. Gianelli Water Leaders program. Without your generosity, this program would not be possible. Disclaimer: This report, and the opinions expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Water Education Foundation (WEF) or its Board of Directors, the Water Leaders, or their employers. Cover photo credit: Ken James/California Department of Water Resources 1 Table of Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. iii List of Figures ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Management.Indd
    Fire today ManagementVolume 65 • No. 2 • Spring 2005 LLARGEARGE FFIRESIRES OFOF 2002—P2002—PARTART 22 United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Erratum In Fire Management Today volume 64(4), the article "A New Tool for Mopup and Other Fire Management Tasks" by Bill Gray shows incorrect telephone and fax numbers on page 47. The correct numbers are 210-614-4080 (tel.) and 210-614-0347 (fax). Fire Management Today is published by the Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. The Secretary of Agriculture has determined that the publication of this periodical is necessary in the transaction of the pub- lic business required by law of this Department. Fire Management Today is for sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, at: Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: 202-512-1800 Fax: 202-512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001 Fire Management Today is available on the World Wide Web at http://www.fs.fed.us/fire/fmt/index.html Mike Johanns, Secretary Melissa Frey U.S. Department of Agriculture General Manager Dale Bosworth, Chief Robert H. “Hutch” Brown, Ph.D. Forest Service Managing Editor Tom Harbour, Director Madelyn Dillon Fire and Aviation Management Editor Delvin R. Bunton Issue Coordinator The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communica- tion of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720- 2600 (voice and TDD).
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Fire Policy: Change Conventional Thinking of Smoke Management to Prioritize Long-Term Air Quality and Public Health
    Author's personal copy Air Qual Atmos Health DOI 10.1007/s11869-016-0405-4 Forest fire policy: change conventional thinking of smoke management to prioritize long-term air quality and public health D. W. Schweizer1 & R. Cisneros1 Received: 31 January 2016 /Accepted: 13 April 2016 # Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 Abstract Wildland fire smoke is inevitable. Size and intensity Keywords Widland fire . Air quality . Policy . Public health . of wildland fires are increasing in the western USA. Smoke-free Smoke management skies and public exposure to wildland fire smoke have effective- ly been postponed through suppression. The historic policy of suppression has systematically both instilled a public expecta- Wildland fire has long been understood to perform many ben- tion of a smoke-free environment and deferred emissions eficial ecosystem functions (Kilgore 1981; Stevens et al. through increased forest fuel loads that will lead to an eventual 2014) including helping to maximize carbon sequestration in large spontaneous release. High intensity fire smoke is fire-prone areas (Hurteau et al. 2008). Recurring lower inten- impacting a larger area including high density urban areas. sity wildland fire additionally limits fire spread, reduces fire Policy change has largely attempted to provide the avenue for progression (Parks et al. 2015), and may provide an avenue to increased use of ecologically beneficial fire but allows for control high-severity emissions of smoke (Steel et al. 2015), continued reliance on suppression as a primary tool for a smoke localizing the subsequent health impacts, decreasing exposure averse population. While understanding the essential role of and population at risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Original Signed By. Kris Cook
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA Budget Change Proposal - Cover Sheet DF-46(REV 08/17) Fiscal Year Business Unit Department Priority No. FY 2019-20 4260 Health Care Services Budget Request Name Program Subprogram 4260-402-BCP-2019-MR 3960 3960050 Budget Request Description SUD Emerging Epidemics, Disaster Response and Licensing Workload Budget Request Summary The Department of Health Care Services (DHCS), Substance Use Disorder Compliance Division (SUDCD), requests 7.0 permanent positions and expenditure authority of $1,060,000 (100% Residential and Outpatient Program Licensing Fund (ROPLF)), in fiscal year (FY) 2019-20, to address the increased workload of responding to: 1) natural disasters and other State Emergencies; 2) the opioid epidemic; 3) the resurgence of methamphetamine abuse; and 4) the rise in number of treatment facilities. In addition, DHCS requests a one-time expense of $100,000 from General Fund (GF) to migrate DHCS's disaster collection and reporting process into the web-based reporting platform, NC4 through an interagency agreement with the California Department of Public Health (CDPH). Requires Legislation Code Section(s) to be Added/Amended/Repealed • Yes • No Does this BCP contain information technology (IT) Department QIC Date components? • Yes El No If yes, departmental Chief Information Officer must sign. For IT requests, specify the project number, the most recent project approval document (FSR, SPR, S1BA, S2AA, S3SD, S4PRA), and the approval date. Project No. Project Approval Document: Approval Date: If proposal affects another department, does other department concur with proposal? • Yes • No Attach comments of affected department, signed and dated by the department director or designee.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Publication Brief on Above Paper
    Western Ecological Research Center Publication Brief for Resource Managers Release: Contact: Phone: Email and web page: January 2009 Dr. Jon E. Keeley 559-565-3170 [email protected] http://www.werc.usgs.gov/seki/keeley.asp Sequoia and Kings Canyon Field Station, USGS Western Ecological Research Center, 47050 Generals Highway #4, Three Rivers, CA 93271 Causes of Large Shrubland Wildfires Large and damaging wildfires are a major concern to Management Implications: the growing population in southern California. Some • Large, high-intensity wildfires are a natural fea- scientists contend that the historical fire regime was ture of southern California landscapes and are not characterized by frequent, small to moderate size, directly the result of past fire suppression activities. slow-moving smoldering fires and it has been disrupted • Large fires over 25,000 acres have not increased in by fire suppression activities, resulting in unnatural frequency over the past 125 years of record. fuel accumulation and unusually large and catastrophic • Baja California is sometimes proposed as a model wildfires. This is of critical management concern be- for southern California fire regimes if fire suppres- cause these advocates contend that large, high-intensity sion were abandoned, but this is discounted on numerous grounds. • Anomalously long droughts have been unusually frequent in the latter half of the 20th century and a major factor behind an unusual number of mega- fires in recent years. • Fuel treatments designed to maintain young age classes of shrublands will not provide reliable bar- riers to fire spread; however, strategic placement may benefit fire suppression activities. • Increasing community responsibility in locating and constructing new homes and more attention to fire prevention are likely to be avenues for the greatest decreases in community vulnerability to wildfires.
    [Show full text]
  • North American Deserts Chihuahuan - Great Basin Desert - Sonoran – Mojave
    North American Deserts Chihuahuan - Great Basin Desert - Sonoran – Mojave http://www.desertusa.com/desert.html In most modern classifications, the deserts of the United States and northern Mexico are grouped into four distinct categories. These distinctions are made on the basis of floristic composition and distribution -- the species of plants growing in a particular desert region. Plant communities, in turn, are determined by the geologic history of a region, the soil and mineral conditions, the elevation and the patterns of precipitation. Three of these deserts -- the Chihuahuan, the Sonoran and the Mojave -- are called "hot deserts," because of their high temperatures during the long summer and because the evolutionary affinities of their plant life are largely with the subtropical plant communities to the south. The Great Basin Desert is called a "cold desert" because it is generally cooler and its dominant plant life is not subtropical in origin. Chihuahuan Desert: A small area of southeastern New Mexico and extreme western Texas, extending south into a vast area of Mexico. Great Basin Desert: The northern three-quarters of Nevada, western and southern Utah, to the southern third of Idaho and the southeastern corner of Oregon. According to some, it also includes small portions of western Colorado and southwestern Wyoming. Bordered on the south by the Mojave and Sonoran Deserts. Mojave Desert: A portion of southern Nevada, extreme southwestern Utah and of eastern California, north of the Sonoran Desert. Sonoran Desert: A relatively small region of extreme south-central California and most of the southern half of Arizona, east to almost the New Mexico line.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Hazards
    Burned Area Emergency Response (BAER) Assessment FINAL Specialist Report – GEOLOGIC HAZARDS Thomas Fire –Los Padres N.F. December, 2017 Jonathan Yonni Schwartz – Geomorphologist/geologist, Los Padres NF Introduction The Thomas Fire started on December 4, 2017, near the Thomas Aquinas College (east end of Sulphur Mountain), Ventura County, California. The fire is still burning and as of December 13, 2017, is estimated to have burned 237,500 acres and is 25% contained. Since the fire is still active, the BAER Team analysis is separated into two phases. This report/analysis covers a very small area of the fire above the community of Ojai, California and is considered phase 1 (of 2). Under phase 1 of this BAER assessment, 40,271 acres are being analyzed (within the fire parameter) out of which 22,971 acres are on National Forest Service Lands. The remaining 17,300 acres are divided between County, City and private lands. Out of a total of 40,271 acres that were analyzed, 99 acres were determined to have burned at a high soil burn severity, 19,243 acres at moderate soil burn severity, 12,044 acres at low soil burn severity and 8,885 acres were unburned. All of the above acres including the unburned acres are within the fire parameter. This report describes and assesses the increase in risk from geologic hazards within the Thomas Fire burned area. When evaluating Geologic Hazards, the focus of the “Geology” function on a BAER Team is on identifying the geologic conditions and geomorphic processes that have helped shape and alter the watersheds and landscapes, and assessing the impacts from the fire on those conditions and processes which will affect downstream values at risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Management Lessons Learned – Evolving Fire Management Programs 1
    Fire Management Lessons Learned Evolving Fire Management Programs on the George Washington and Jefferson National Forests of Virginia, West Virginia, and Kentucky and Sequoia National Forest and Giant Sequoia National Monument of California Prepared for U.S. Forest Service Washington Office and Wildland Fire Lessons Learned Center By Carol Ewell and David Kerr, with contributions by Scott Williams – Adaptive Management Services Enterprise Team (AMSET) and Frankie Romero and Tim Sexton – U.S. Forest Service November 2013 Fire Management Lessons Learned – Evolving Fire Management Programs 1 Contents Executive Summary…………………………………….………... 3 1. Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 2. George Washington and Jefferson National Forests……………………………………… 7 Theme 1: Organizational Culture……………………………………………………………… 7 Theme 2: Safety……………………………………………………………………………………..… 19 Theme 3: Economics……………………………………………………………………………..…. 21 Theme 4: Natural Resource Effects and Data Modeling…………………….…….. 22 3. Sequoia National Forest and Giant Sequoia National Monument…………..……… 29 Theme 1: Organizational Culture……………………………………………………………… 29 Theme 2: Safety………………………………………………………………………………..……… 40 Theme 3: Economics…………………………………………………………………………..……. 40 Theme 4: Natural Resource Effects and Data Modeling………………………..….. 43 4. National Goals Tie Ecosystem Restoration Together with Fire and Fuel Management…………………………………………………………..………. 47 5. Lessons Learned…………………………………………………………………………………..……….. 48 6. Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………………..…….……. 51 7. References……………………………………………………………………………………………..…….
    [Show full text]
  • Wildfire Resilience Insurance
    WILDFIRE RESILIENCE INSURANCE: Quantifying the Risk Reduction of Ecological Forestry with Insurance WILDFIRE RESILIENCE INSURANCE: Quantifying the Risk Reduction of Ecological Forestry with Insurance Authors Willis Towers Watson The Nature Conservancy Nidia Martínez Dave Jones Simon Young Sarah Heard Desmond Carroll Bradley Franklin David Williams Ed Smith Jamie Pollard Dan Porter Martin Christopher Felicity Carus This project and paper were funded in part through an Innovative Finance in National Forests Grant (IFNF) from the United States Endowment for Forestry and Communities, with funding from the United States Forest Service (USFS). The United States Endowment for Forestry and Communities, Inc. (the “Endowment”) is a not-for-profit corporation that works collaboratively with partners in the public and private sectors to advance systemic, transformative and sustainable change for the health and vitality of the nation’s working forests and forest-reliant communities. We want to thank and acknowledge Placer County and the Placer County Water Agency (PCWA) for their leadership and partnership with The Nature Conservancy and the US Forest Service on the French Meadows ecological forest project and their assistance with the Wildfire Resilience Insurance Project and this paper. We would like in particular to acknowledge the assistance of Peter Cheney, Risk and Safety Manager, PCWA and Marie L.E. Davis, PG, Consultant to PCWA. Cover photo: Increasing severity of wildfires in California results in more deaths, injuries, and destruction of
    [Show full text]
  • How the Local Implementation of Air Quality Regulations Affects Wildfire Air Policy
    Beyond the Exceptional Events Rule: How the Local Implementation of Air Quality Regulations Affects Wildfire Air Policy Ben Richmond* What can be done about the recent phenomenon of intense wildfire air pollution in the American West? Wildfire science emphasizes the importance of using fire as a natural, regenerative process to maintain forest health and reduce large wildfire air pollution events. But forestry management policy has long emphasized suppressing wildfires, loading forests with fuel and increasing the risk of catastrophic wildfires. As a result, using prescribed fire to restore Western forests and reduce long-term air pollution creates tension with air quality law, because in the short term, prescribed fires will worsen air quality. Despite the exceptional events rule of the Clean Air Act allowing the use of prescribed fire as a wildfire management tool, the local implementation of air quality laws hinders the use of prescribed fire for forest management. Looking to California and more specifically the San Joaquin Valley as a case study, this Note uses new data to show that while land managers and air quality regulators in the San Joaquin Valley have drastically increased their use of prescribed fire, this increase is not sufficient to return the southern Sierra Nevada to a natural fire-adapted ecosystem. Policy makers should pursue even more aggressive options to encourage prescribed fire by modifying the structure of air quality law. Subjecting large wildfires to the requirements of the Clean Air Act would incentivize local air managers to develop plans on how to mitigate the effects of wildfire in the long term.
    [Show full text]