DOCSLIB.ORG

Download This

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download This NPS Form 10-900 •OMB-N074G024-0018 RECEIVED United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places L WAT. REGISTER 0 ! ; Registration Form NATION/!! r.r; This form is for use in nominating or requesting determination for individual properties and districts See instruction in How to enter only categories ana suocategones rrom tne instructions. Mace aaamonai entries ana narranv sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Prooertv historic name Denver Tramway Powerhouse other names/site number Fornev Historic Transportation Museum: Recreation Equipment inc.: 5DV541 2. Location ___ _______________ street & number 1416 Platte Street [N/A] not for publication city or town Denver ____ [N/A] vicinity state Colorado code CO county Denver code 031 zip code 80202 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this [X] nomination [ ] request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property [X] meets [ ] does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant [ ] nationally [ ] statewide [X] locally. ([ ] See continuation sheet for additional comments.) __ __ _ __ State Historic Preservation Officer Signature (Oj certifying official/ntie " State Historic Preservation Office, Colorado Historical Society State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property [ ] meets [ ] does not meet the National Register criteria. ( [ ] See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of certifying official/Title Date State or Federal agency and bureau 4. National Park Service Certification hereby/ertify that the property is: Signature of the V] entered in the National Register fffrtio*^ BflgJg&ar [ ] See continuation sheet. [ ] determined eligible for the National Register [ ] See continuation sheet. [ ] determined not eligible for the National Register. [ ] removed from the National Register [ ] other, explain [ ] See continuation sheet. Denver Tramway Powerhouse Denver. Colorado Name of Property County/State 5. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property (Check as many boxes as apply) (Check only one box) (Do not count previously listed resources.) Contributing Noncontributing [X] private [X] building(s) [ ] public-local [ ] district 1 0 buildings [ ] public-State [ ] site [ ] public-Federal [ ] structure 0 0 sites [ ] object 0 0 structures 0 0 objects 1 0 Total Name of related multiple property listing. Number of contributing resources (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing.) previously listed in the National Register. N/A 0 6. Function or Use Historic Function Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) Energy Facility Specialty Store Restaurant 7. Description Architectural Classification Materials (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) Late 19th and Early 20th Century foundation concrete American Movements______ walls brick Other: American round-arch style concrete steel roof steel other glass Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current condition of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) Denver Tramway Powerhouse Denver. Colorado Name of Property County/State 8. Statement of Sianificance Applicable National Register Criteria Areas of Significance (Mark "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property for National (Enter categories from instructions) Register listing.) Transportation______ [X] A Property is associated with events that have made a Engineering significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. [ ] B Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. Periods of Significance [X] C Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a 1901-1950 type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack Significant Dates individual distinction. 1911 [ ] D Property has yielded, or is likely to yield, information 1924 important in prehistory or history. 1950 Criteria Considerations (Mark "x" in all the boxes that apply.) Significant Person(s) Property is: (Complete if Criterion B is marked above). N/A [ ] A owned by a religious institution or used for religious purposes. [ ] B removed from its original location. Cultural Affiliation [ ] C a birthplace or grave. N/A [ ] D a cemetery. [ ] E a reconstructed building, object, or structure. Architect/Builder [ ] F a commemorative property. Unknown [ ] G less than 50 years of age or achieved significance within the past 50 years. Narrative Statement of Significance (Explain the significance of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) 9. Major Bibliographical References Bibliography (Cite the books, articles and other sources used in preparing this form on one or more continuation sheets.) Previous documentation on file (NPS): Primary location of additional data: [ ] preliminary determination of individual listing (36 CFR 67) has been [X] State Historic Preservation Office requested [ ] Other State Agency [ ] previously listed in the National Register [ ] Federal Agency [X] previously determined eligible by the National Register [ ] Local Government [ ] designated a National Historic Landmark [ ] University [ ] recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey [ ] Other #___________________________________ Name of repository: [ ] recorded by Historic American Engineering Record # Colorado History Museum. Denver Denver Tramway Powerhouse Denver, Colorado Name of Property County/State 10. Geographical Data____________________________ Acreage of Property 1.5_____ DIM References (Place additional UTM references on a continuation sheet.) 1. 13 499240 4400370 3. Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing 2. 4. Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing [ ] See continuation sheet Verbal Boundary Description (Describe the boundaries of the property on a continuation sheet.) Boundary Justification (Explain why the boundaries were selected on a continuation sheet.) 11. Form Prepared By______________________________________ name/title Robert A. Peering / Senior Associate (additional materials by OAHP staff)_____ organization Mithun Architects + Designers + Planners_______ date February 28. 2001 street & number Pier 56 - 1201 Alaskan Way. Suite 200______ telephone 206-623-3344 city or town Seattle_______________ state WA_____ zip code 98101_______ Additional Documentation Submit the following items with the completed form: Continuation Sheets Maps A USGS map (7.5 or 15 minute series) indicating the property's location. A Sketch map for historic districts and properties having large acreage or numerous resources. Photographs Representative black and white photographs of the property. Additional Items (Check with the SHPO or FPO for any additional items) Property Owner_____________________________________________ (Complete this item at the request of SHPO or FPO.) name Recreational Equipment. Inc._____________________________________________ street & number PO Box 1938____________________ telephone 253-395-3780________ city or town Summer______________ state WA_____ zip code 98390-0800________ Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or determine eligibility for listing, to list properties, and to amend existing listings. Response to this request is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 etseq. NPSForm 10-900a 0MB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 8/86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Denver Tramway Powerhouse Section number _7_ Page J_ Denver, Colorado DESCRIPTION The Denver Tramway Powerhouse is a large industrial structure located along the South Platte River adjacent to downtown Denver, Colorado. 1 The building sits at the convergence of Cherry Creek and the South Platte River. This location was advantageous for the production of electric power due to nearby rail lines, which provided access to coal for fuel, and the adjacent river, which provided cooling water and a means of discarding waste. The site was also central to other Tramway system facilities. The orientation of the powerhouse along a northwest-southeast axis matches the diagonal compass orientation of the city's downtown street grid. The original 1901-04 building was followed by an addition in 1911 that extended the building to the northwest and increased its square footage by half. 2 A second addition in 1924 served as the battery house. The one-story over basement powerhouse is constructed of concrete foundations, red brick walls, and a steel roof, and is of generally rectangular plan, measuring approximately 108 feet by 440 feet by 55 feet high above grade. The battery house addition is an all-concrete two-story structure located in the north corner measuring approximately 24 feet by 145 feet by 34 feet above grade. The foundations
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Greater Kansas City Chamber of Commerce
    Transit as a Catalyst for a Winning Region: A Denver Case Study Maria Garcia Berry May 17, 2018 Regionalism is Born 1960s 100-year Flood 1970s School Desegregation and Busing Annexation Wars 1980s Retail Wars Denver International Airport Convention Center 16th Street Mall 2 Regionalism Grows Up 1990s: Formation of Metro Mayors Caucus Sports Facilities T-REX Project - Rail and Roads TABOR – Taxpayers’ Bill of Rights 2000s: Water Wars FasTracks - Expansion of Transit Growth and Development The Great Recession 2010s: Statewide Transportation Challenges Marijuana – The New Mile High City 3 The Early Years of Transit 1960s: Denver Tramway Company files for bankruptcy and transfers assets to city- owned Denver Metro Transit 1969: RTD was created by the Colorado General Assembly 1973: Voters approved .05% sales tax for RTD 1974: Denver Metro Transit becomes part of RTD 1994: Central Connector Light Rail Line opens 2000: Southwest Light Rail Line opens 2002: Central Platte Valley Spur opens 4 Laying the Groundwork for FasTracks • Proposed “Guide the Ride” expansion failed in 1997 (57% to 43%) – Dysfunctional board – Conceptual Plan – “trust us with your money” – The “yes” campaign spent $650,000; “no” $50,000 • In 1999, CDOT and RTD collaborated on two ballot measures approved by the voters – Granted CDOT authority to pledge federal revenues to retire debt – Allowed RTD to seek additional bonding authority for rail construction 3 – TREX expanded I-25 and built 19 miles of light rail Laying the Groundwork for FasTracks • By 2001, RTD Board and
    [Show full text]
  • January–June 2005 · $10.00 / Rails To
    January–June 2005 · $10.00 / Rails to Rubber to Rails Again, Part 1: Alabama–Montana Headlights The Magazine of Electric Railways Published since 1939 by the Electric Railroaders’ Association, Inc. WWW.ERAUSA.ORG Staff Contents Editor and Art Director January–June 2005 Sandy Campbell Associate Editors Raymond R. Berger, Frank S. Miklos, John Pappas Contributors Edward Ridolph, Trevor Logan, Bill Volkmer, Columns Alan K. Weeks 2 News Electric Railroaders’ Compiled by Frank Miklos. International transportation reports. Association, Inc. E Two-Part Cover Story Board of Directors 2008 President 18 Rails to Rubber to Rails Again Frank S. Miklos By Edward Ridolph. An extensive 60-year summary of the street railway industry in First Vice President the U.S. and Canada, starting with its precipitous 30-year, post-World War II decline. William K. Guild It continues with the industry’s rebirth under the banner of “light rail” in the early Second Vice President & Corresponding Secretary 1980s, a renaissance which continues to this day. Raymond R. Berger Third Vice President & Recording Secretary Robert J. Newhouser Below: LAMTA P3 3156 is eastbound across the First Street bridge over the Los Treasurer Angeles River in the waning weeks of service before abandonment of Los Angeles’ Michael Glikin narrow gauge system on March 31, 1963. GERALD SQUIER PHOTO Director Jeffrey Erlitz Membership Secretary Sandy Campbell Officers 2008 Trip & Convention Chairman Jack May Librarian William K. Guild Manager of Publication Sales Raymond R. Berger Overseas Liason Officer James Mattina National Headquarters Grand Central Terminal, New York City A-Tower, Room 4A Mailing Address P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • 20Th CENTURY COLORADO – TRANSPORTATION Public
    20th CENTURY COLORADO – TRANSPORTATION Public Transportation What do these photos tell you about the different kinds of public transportation 20th century Coloradans used? A 1920’s City Bus This is an Englewood city bus of the 1920s. Englewood city bus Photo: Denver Public Library, Western History Collection More About This Topic Electric streetcars provided public transportation in most Colorado cities during the early 1900s. During the 1920s some cities also added busses. The bus in this photo provided transportation from downtown Englewood to the Fort Logan Military Hospital. Denver Tramway Company Bus This bus provided public transportation in Denver during the 1930s. Denver’s Tramway Company Photo: Denver Public Library, Western History Collection More About This Topic Denver’s Tramway Company used busses during the 1920s in addition to electric streetcars. It ran busses like this one on streets that did not have streetcar lines. This bus was built in 1929 by the White Motor Company. Denver Tramway Company Streetcar This is a Denver Tramway Company trolley or street car. The photo was taken in 1940. Denver Tramway Company trolley Photo: Denver Public Library, Western History Collection More About This Topic It took several years for gasoline powered busses to replace electric streetcars in Denver. Streetcars could carry more passengers more cheaply than early busses. The streetcar in this photo ran between Denver and the town of Golden. A 1930’s City Bus This is a Denver Tramway Company bus. The photo probably was taken during the 1930s. Denver Tramway Company bus Photo: Colorado Historical Society More About This Topic To serve its customers better, the Tramway Company kept adding busses to streets that did not have electric streetcars.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Management Lessons Learned West Rail Line Project December 2014
    Program Management Lessons Learned West Rail Line Project December 2014 i Contents Acronyms ................................................................................................................................... iv Glossary ...................................................................................................................................... v Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 1 Background and Overview ............................................................................................................. 2 Project Background ..................................................................................................................... 2 Project Overview ........................................................................................................................ 4 Awards and Recognitions ........................................................................................................... 5 Lesson #1: Construction Manager/General Contractor (CM/GC) Contracting Approach ............. 6 Lesson Overview and Background ............................................................................................. 6 The Lessons ................................................................................................................................ 7 Lesson #2: Separation of Civil and Systems Contracts .................................................................. 8 Lesson Overview
    [Show full text]
  • RTD 2019 Factsheet Booklet
    2019 FACT SHEETS Regional Transportation District On the Cover: The first on-road deployment of an autonomous vehicle (AV) made its debut as RTD’s Route 61AV at the end of January 2019. The self- driving EasyMile shuttle is 100 percent electric and will connect passengers from the 61st & Pena Station along the University of Colorado A Line to the Panasonic and EasyMile offices. The shuttle can carry up to 12 passengers and will run Monday through Friday from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m., making a loop to four stops every 15 minutes at an average speed of 12 – 15 miles per hour. The goal of the project is to determine whether the autonomous vehicle could serve as a possible future first and last mile solution for transit riders. Route 61AV is a pilot project that was approved by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the newly formed Colorado Autonomous Vehicle Task Force. RTD BOARD OF DIRECTORS Kate Williams Shontel Lewis Angie Rivera-Malpiede Jeff Walker Claudia Folska, Ph.D. District A District B District C District D District E Bob Broom Ken Mihalik Doug Tisdale Judy Lubow Vince Buzek District F District G District H District I District J Chair Troy Whitmore Shelley Cook Natalie Menten Peggy Catlin Lynn Guissinger District K District L District M District N District O GENERAL MANAGER AND CEO Dave Genova TABLE OF CONTENTS Inside RTD . .6 – 7 OTHER Americans with Disabilities Act ............ 60 – 61 RAIL Civic Center Station ...................... 62 – 63 Rail & Flatiron Flyer Map ........................8 Cleaner Air .............................. 64 – 65 Commuter Rail vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Collaboration in Transport Infrastructure Provision: the Case of Denver’S Fastracks Rail Transit Program
    Regional Collaboration in Transport Infrastructure Provision: The Case of Denver’s FasTracks Rail Transit Program Final report National Center for Intermodal Transportation, University of Denver June 2011 Research team: Andrew R. Goetz* [email protected] . Andrew E.G. Jonas** [email protected] Sutapa Bhattacharjee* [email protected] *Department of Geography, University of Denver, Colorado, USA **Department of Geography, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom Contents 1. Introduction: Research Description, Objectives, Application and Summary of Key Findings 3 2. Regional Collaboration in the United States: The Federal Context 10 3. Regional Collaboration in the Denver Area: The Role of State and Local Government 20 4. The Denver FasTracks Rail Transit Program: History and Background 33 5. Building a New Approach to Regional Collaboration in Denver, 1990- 2010 49 6. Regional Collaboration in Denver: Some Findings and Conclusions 63 References 83 Useful web links 89 Acknowledgments 90 Appendix A: List of interview questions 91 Appendix B: Regional collaboration survey 93 2 1. Introduction: Research Description, Objectives, Application and Summary of Key Findings 1.1 Project title Regional Collaboration in Transport Infrastructure Provision: The Case of Denver‘s FasTracks Rail Transit Program 1.2: Problem description Cities across the United States are grappling with a looming transportation crisis as a result of ever-increasing passenger and freight transport demands and overburdened networks of aging infrastructure. All levels of government, but particularly state and local governments, need to develop innovative financing mechanisms and strong collaborations among stakeholders to maintain and enhance transportation infrastructure. This project examines how regional collaboration was achieved in the case of Denver‘s FasTracks rail transit program, a 122-mile extension of light and commuter rail in six corridors throughout the Denver metropolitan area to be completed over the next ten or so years (Figure 1-1).
    [Show full text]
  • Wra\O* Jf Xv——— •, ———— * ^^ I— ' —(Li
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) 2280 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service IWI6I998 National Register of Historic Places Registration Form I This form is for use in nominating or requesting determination for individual properties and districts. See instruction in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter N/A" for "not applicable." Tor functions, architectural classification, materials and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Motor Coach Division Building. Denver Tramway Company____________ other names/site number East Side Car Barn: Gilpin Street Car Barn; 5DV5337___________ 2. Location ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~"~~~ street & number 3500 Gilpin Street [N/A] not for publication city or town Denver ____ [N/A] vicinity state Colorado code CO county Denver code 031 zip code 80205 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, 1 hereby certify that this [X] nomination [ ] request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property [X] meets [ ] does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Trail Map Text
    Historic Trail Map of the Denver 1° × 2° Quadrangle, Central Colorado By Glenn R. Scott Prepared in cooperation with the Denver Public Library, Western History and Genealogy Department Pamphlet to accompany Geologic Investigations Series I-2639 1999 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CONTENTS Introduction 1 Unsolved problems 4 Method of preparation of the trail map 4 Acknowledgments 4 Established and proposed toll roads and post roads in the Denver l° × 2° quadrangle 5 Established and proposed toll roads in the Denver quadrangle having certificates of incorporation from the Kansas Territorial Legislature 6 Established and proposed toll roads in the Denver quadrangle having certificates of incorporation from the Jefferson Territorial Legislature 6 Established and proposed toll roads in the Denver quadrangle having certificates of incorporation from the Colorado Legislative Assembly 7 Roads established or proposed under General Assembly Session Laws, Colorado Territorial Corporations and Charters, 1859-1876 20 Post Roads and territorial roads 23 Post Roads 24 More Post Roads 24 Passenger and mail routes 24 Far West Stageline notice to passengers 24 Hints for plains travelers 25 Sources of information on toll roads 25 Mountain passes in the Denver quadrangle 26 Sources of information about passes 28 Some stage companies that operated in the Denver quadrangle 28 Toll road builders 30 Famous western trails 30 Claim Clubs in Colorado 31 Railroads and streetcar lines operated in the Denver quadrangle and vicinity 31 Maps of the two-foot-gauge Gilpin Tramway 34 General sources of information 34 Military and civilian camps, forts, posts, and bases in Colorado 39 Camps listed in Colorado morning reports 51 Selected references about military and civilian camps, forts, posts, and bases 51 Selected references that locate named Mining Districts and named Groups of Mines 53 FIGURES 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Buildings Survey Littleton, Colorado 2000-2001
    C L HISTORIC BUILDINGS SURVEY LITTLETON, COLORADO 2000-2001 Survey Report I- I-95' Front Range Research Associates, Inc. Denver, Colorado HISTORIC BUILDINGS SURVEY LITTLETON, COLORADO 2000-2001 Survey Report Prepared for: City of Littleton 2255 West Berry Avenue Littleton, Colorado 80120 (303) 795-3950 Prepared by: R. Laurie Simmons, MA., and Thomas H. Simmons, M.A. Front Range Research Associates, Inc. 3635 West 46th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80211-1101 (303) 477-7597 17 October 2001 Partially funded by a Colorado State Historical Fund Grant, Number 2000-01-069 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface iv 1. MANAGEMENT SUMMARY. 1 II. INTRODUCTION 2 III. ACKNOWLEGEMENTS 6 IV. PROJECT AREA AND PHYSICAL SETTING 7 V. METHODOLOGY 10 VI. RESEARCH DESIGN 16 VII. HISTORIC CONTEXT 17 VIII. RESULTS 67 BIBLIOGRAPHY 86 APPENDICES 90 1. Platted Subdivisions in Littleton, 1871-2000 91 2. Littleton Annexations, 1890-2000 97 3. Representation of Architects in Littleton 100 4. City of Littleton Surveyed Historic Resources, by Street Address, 2000-01 102 5. City of Littleton Surveyed Historic Resources by State ID Number, 2000-01 118 COVER: Edward and Maggie Spackman stand in front of their house at 5666 South Crocker in a photograph taken about 1910. SOURCE: Littleton Historical Museum, photographic collection. City of Littleton Historic Buildings Survey, 2000-01 Page iii PREFACE This report summarizes the findings of a historic buildings survey of 604 properties in Littleton, Colorado, completed in 2001. The report presents a management summary, an introduction, acknowledgments, a description of the project area and physical setting, the methodology for the project, a research design, a historic context, and the results of the survey.
    [Show full text]
  • South Broadway Environmental Assessment & Section 4(F)
    3.12 HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRESERVATION Legislation at the state and federal levels requires that governmental agencies assess the impacts of proposed projects on historic and archaeological resources before undertaking a project. The federal legislation that protects historic and archaeological resources includes Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA as amended). Section 106 of the NHPA requires that federal agencies or other agencies that use federal funds consider the effects of their actions on historic properties. An historic property is defined as any prehistoric or historic site, district, structure, building, object or archaeological resource included on or eligible for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The Section 106 process includes steps to: 1) identify and evaluate historic properties, 2) assess the impacts of an undertaking on the historic properties, and 3) consult with appropriate agencies for measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate any adverse effects. The process for complying with the state legislation is similar. This section addresses the requirements of Section 106 of the NHPA and the Colorado statutes protecting historic resources. Four main criteria are used to determine if a property is eligible for inclusion on the NRHP: Criterion A: The property is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad pattern of our history. Criterion B: The property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. Criterion C: The property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction; or represents the work of a master; or possesses high artistic values; or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction.
    [Show full text]
  • Denver's Historic Uptown District
    VIRTUAL FRIELD TRIPS – DENVER’S HISTORIC UPTOWN DISTRICT Fire Station #1 In 1909, the city of Denver built Fire Station No. 1 to help protect the business district. The first floor was used for horse stalls and to park fire wagons. Later, the stalls and wagons were removed to make room for modern‐day fire trucks. The second floor included living, sleeping and eating areas for the firemen. This station served the city for over 60 years. Fire Station #1 Photo: N/A More About This Topic When the city built Fire Station No. 1, it hired an architect to design an attractive building. This station, designed by Glen W. Huntington, includes several elements of the classical style of architecture. (Buildings in the classical style remind one of temples constructed by the ancient Greeks.) The classical elements in this fire station include the columns that frame the windows on the second floor. The long cornice above the columns also gives the building a classical look. The city preserved this building after it was no longer needed as a fire station by turning it into a museum. In 1974, the fire fighters moved to a new building. Four years later, the old Fire Station No. 1 building became the Denver Firefighters' Museum. Visitors to the museum can see early fire trucks and fire‐ fighting equipment on display. Denver Athletic Club The Denver Athletic Club was built in 1889 as a men’s club. It provided exercise equipment and room where men could hold meetings and have lunch. Its members included many of Denver’s business and civic leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Community Planning for Mass Transit: Volume 5Ñdenver
    Critical History of Transit Planning and Decisionmaking Ten years ago few people thought Denver concerned about financial difficulties of the city’s needed a fixed guideway transit system. Most bus company to negotiate the establishment of a residents of Denver’s low-density urbanized area powerful regional transit authority that could plan could travel easily by automobile. Since then, improvements in the area’s transit service. however, worsening air pollution and other Transportation planning in the Denver impacts of growth have sharpened concern for metropolitan area began in the early 1940’s with environmental quality among the residents of the origin-destination studies performed by the area and, in turn, aroused interest in fixed- Colorado Division of Highways (CDH). In 1957, guideway transit. the U.S. Bureau of Public Roads provided funds While popular support for mass transit was that allowed CDH to sponsor the first Denver growing, several factors encouraged the develop- Metropolitan Area Transportation Study ment of automated transit for Denver. Increasing ( DMATS). DMATS was jointly carried out by bus system deficits inspired a search for a more CDH, the Inter-County Regional Planning Com- efficient approach to transit operations. UMTA’S mission (the predecessor of DRCOG), and the City Center City Transportation Project in 1970 and County of Denver. Financed primarily by suggested a PRT link for downtown Denver, thus Federal highway and HUD 701 funds, DMATS ins talling the PRT concept as a popular favorite. concentrated on planning a highway network. The The relocation of many advanced technology study forecast that a maximum of only 4 percent of companies to the Denver area provided a reservoir total trips in Denver would use public transporta- of experts with skills and interest in new tion.
    [Show full text]