A Dual-Level Approach to Instanton Theory Arxiv:2009.04309V1

A Dual-Level Approach to Instanton Theory

Jan Meisner and Johannes K¨astner∗

Institute for Theoretical Chemistry, University of Stuttgart, Pfaﬀenwaldring 55, 70569 Stuttgart,Germany

Abstract rate constants. An efficient yet accurate computational method to incorporate atom tunnel- Instanton theory is an established method ing is semiclassical instanton theory.1–5 Instan- to calculate rate constants of chemical reac- ton theory can be understood as a quantum tions including atom tunneling. Technical and mechanical analog to transition state theory methodological improvements increased its ap- (TST), thus, referred to as harmonic quantum plicability. Still, a large number of energy and transition state theory.6,7 The idea of instanton gradient calculations is necessary to optimize theory is to include nuclear quantum effects by the instanton tunneling path and 2nd deriva- statistical Feynman path integrals. Partition tives of the potential energy along the tunneling functions are approximated by the steepest de- path have to be evaluated, restricting the range scent approach, i.e. optimizing the most likely of suitable electronic structure methods. To en- tunneling path, the so-called instanton, which hance the applicability of instanton theory, we is a 1st order saddle-point of the Euclidean ac- present a dual-level approach in which instan- tion SE, and taking fluctuations into account ton optimizations and Hessian calculations are within the harmonic approximation.8–14 It is performed using an efficient but approximate a successful compromise between accuracy and electronic structure method and the potential computational efficiency as it does not require energy along the tunneling path is recalculated a global potential energy surface, but can be using a more accurate method. This proce- used in combination with on-the-fly electronic dure extends the applicability of instanton the- structure calculations.15,16 ory to high-level electronic structure methods The applicability of instanton theory to the for which analytic gradients may not be avail- quantification of atom tunneling in molecular able, like local linear-scaling approaches. We systems has been frequently demonstrated in demonstrate for the analytical Eckart barrier the past decade.16–31 While traditionally in- and three molecular systems how the dual-level stanton paths were often guessed or approxi- instanton approach corrects for the largest part mated using further assumptions,32–35 a mod- arXiv:2009.04309v1 [physics.chem-ph] 9 Sep 2020 of the error caused by the inaccuracy of the effi- ified Newton–Raphson (NR) instanton opti- cient electronic structure method. This reduces mizer9 allows efficient instanton search for the error of the calculated rate constants signif- molecular systems with many degrees of free- icantly. dom.9,22–31,36 In practical applications, the instanton path Introduction yinst is discretized into P replicas or images. From these, the Euclidean action SE = S0/2 + The accurate description of atom tunneling is crucial for the calculation of precise reaction

1 Spot can be calculated with The zero-eigenvalues are left out of the product, thus the prime in the product sign in equa- P P X 2 tion (4). Together with the instanton optimiza- S0 = (yk − yk−1) , (1) β~ tion, the calculation of the Hessians is the most k=1 time-consuming step in computational applica- and tions of instanton theory. In one example de- P β X scribed below, a sixteen-atomic molecular sys- S = ~ V (y ). (2) pot P k tem (i.e. N = 48), the instanton is discretized k=1 into P = 100 images. This leads to a 2400- Here, yk are the N mass-weighted coordinates dimensional optimization problem (because the of the kth image, ~ is the reduced Planck’s con- instanton, a closed Feynman path, covers the −1 stant, β = (kBT ) , T is the temperature, and same line in configuration space twice, forward kB is Boltzmann’s constant. The reduced ac- and backward). Even though the instanton op- 9 tion S0 is a measure of the path length and the timization often requires just a few iterations, distribution of the images along the path, while for every iteration P/2 = 50 energy and gradi- Spot basically averages the potential along the ent evaluations are required. For the rate con- instanton path. The potential V (yk) at each stant calculation, 50 Hessian calculations have image k is obtained from electronic structure to be carried out. These computations provide calculations. the rate constant for one value of the temper- Instanton theory is, in its standard form, ap- ature. It is obvious that instanton calculations plicable only below a system-specific crossover involve a significant computational effort. temperature In this paper, a dual-level approach to in- ~ωb stanton theory is presented where for the time- Tc = (3) 2πkB consuming calculations a fast approximative which depends on the absolute value of the method is applied to calculate V (y). Subse- imaginary frequency of the transition state ωb. quent energy calculations with a more accurate Methods to extend it to above Tc are avail- electronic structure method improve the quality able,12–14,37 but will not be used here. of the calculated rate constant significantly. The instanton rate constant is obtained by Three different molecular systems were used to illustrate the performance of the dual-level s s QNP RS instanton approach: the isomerization of HNC S0P l=1 λl kinst = 0 × to HCN, an intramolecular [1,5] hydride shift, 2πβ~2 Q NP |λinst| l=1 l and the bimolecular hydrogen atom transfer re- SE(inst) − SE(RS) exp − . (4) action of NH2 + H2 → NH3 + H. For each sys- ~ tem, reaction rate constants were calculated using the dual-level approach and are compared Here, S (inst) refers to the Euclidean action E to the results of the conventional instanton the- of the instanton path, while S (RS) is the Eu- E ory at both the basic and accurate electronic clidean action of the reactant state. In the potential. latter, the optimal Feynman path is collapsed to the minimum on the potential energy surface, i.e. S0(RS) = 0 and SE(RS) = β~V (yRS). Background and Computa- The eigenvalues λRS and λinst refer to the sec- l l tional Details ond derivatives of SE with respect to all coordinates of all images. To evaluate the lat- In computational chemistry, the evaluation of ter, Hessians of V (y ) have to be calculated k the electronic potential energy is often the most for all images along the instanton path. One time-consuming step. One possible compromise eigenvalue λinst is negative, seven are zero (six l to obtain reliable results within a reasonable for linear molecules), all others are positive.15 time is a dual-level approach. An approximate,

2 but less demanding computational method is Hitherto, different studies combined approx- used for geometry optimizations and Hessian imate instanton methods with dual-level ap- calculations in what will be referred to as the proaches33,34,42 or used basic-potential instan- basic potential in the following. Subsequently, tons as initial guess for the optimization of the potential energy is calculated using a more high-potential ones to obtain tunneling split- accurate, but more time consuming electronic tings.43,44 Only an instanton path fully opti- structure method, which provides the refined mized on the same potential energy surface as potential. The fundamental assumption is that the one used for the Hessian calculations en- inst the basic potential is still able to reproduce the sures the proper eigenvalue structure of λl . molecular geometries of the stationary points Thus, in this work, instantons are optimized in sufficiently accurate. Thermochemical results all dimensions using the basic potential, i.e., obtained in this way generally agree very well they are true 1st-order saddle points of the Eu- with results obtained with the refined potential. clidean action SE. The refined potential is then Also some calculations of rate constants us- used to correct Spot. ing different tunneling corrections such as SCT For dual-level approaches in quantum chem- and µOMT utilized a dual-level approach suc- istry, the nomenclature cessfully.38–40 Dual-level or even multi-level ap- Method /basis set // Method /basis set proaches have been used for the calculation of A A B B potential energy surfaces necessary for the com- is used. Here, A labels the level of theory and putation of vibrational spectroscopy.41 basis set of the refined potential and B refers Here, we show that the dual-level instanton to the basic potential. For simplicity, the ba- approach leads to excellent results in terms of sis set declaration is omitted in the shorthand accuracy and computational effort. First the notation discretized instanton is optimized on the basic potential. Hessians of the potential energy are MethodA // MethodB also calculated using the basic potential, pro- when possible. RS inst viding λl and λl . Subsequently the energies In this work all geometry optimizations, in- at all images, V (yk), as well as V (yRS) are cal- cluding intrinsic reaction coordinates (IRCs) culated on the refined potential. Note, that no and instantons, as well as rate calculations were geometry optimizations at the refined potential performed using the DL-FIND optimization li- are necessary, just energy calculations. From brary45 interfaced to Chemshell.46,47 IRCs were these, Spot is obtained using the refined poten- optimized using a Hessian-predictor-corrector tial. This is assumed to correct the error caused algorithm.48 Instantons were optimized un- by the inaccuracy of the basic potential. The til the maximum component of the gradi- working hypothesis is that the basic potential ent is smaller than 1 · 10−8 atomic units is able to reproduce the shape and image distri- (scaled relative to the electron’s mass) using bution of the instantons qualitatively well. The the adapted, quadratically convergent Newton– dual-level instanton rate constant reads Raphson algorithm.9,10 CCSD(T)-F12a49,50 cal- 51 s culations were performed using molpro with s QNP RS S0P λ default settings and the cc-pVDZ-F12 basis set kDual = l=1 l × inst 2πβ 2 Q0NP inst throughout.52 All DFT calculations were per- ~ l=1 |λl |   formed with Turbomole version 7.0.1.53 SCF − S0(inst) − S (inst) + S (RS) 2 pot pot energies were converged to an accuracy of exp   ~ 10−9 Hartree on an m5 multi-grid.54 For the Eckart barrier and reaction 1, P = (5) 200 images were used, for reaction 2, P = 100 where highlighting denotes the refined poten- was used for all temperatures. For reaction 3, tial. P = 154 images were used for the DFT instanton calculations. For the instantons calculated

3 on CCSD(T)-F12 level, 40 images were used that Tc = 300 K. down to 219 K, 78 images down to 131 K, and 0.020 V = 154 and 306 images for 119 K and 109 K, respec- max 0.01 (ref) tively. Tests showed, that the rate constants 0.015 0.020 were converged with respect to the number of 0.014 0.010 0.011 images P within the comparisons done here. 0.009 This paper demonstrates the applicability of 0.005 0.007 0.005 ) in Hartree the dual-level instanton method. Here, the fo- x

( 0.000 cus lies on the comparison of the dual-level V instanton method with conventional instanton -0.005 theory. As absolute values of the reaction rate -0.010 constants are of less importance for this study, -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 x in aBohr no comparison with literature values is done. 4 10 basic potential

2 dual-level Results 10 0 10

The Eckart barrier -2 at 140 K 10 ref

k / As a first example, we apply the dual- k -4 10 level scheme to the analytic one-dimensional 55 -6 Eckart barrier in order to distinguish spe- 10 cific inaccuracies of the basic potential and -0.005 0.000 0.005 0.010 their effects on the dual-level approach. We Vmax-Vmax,ref in Hartree investigated several different scenarios of which we show one typical case and the one where we Figure 1: Effects of errors in the barrier height found the weakest performance of the dual-level on the rate constants. Top: Barrier shapes for approach in order to learn about the limits of different values of Vmax, thicker lines indicate the method. instantons at 140 K. Bottom: Deviation of the The potential of the Eckart barrier is given by rate constant as function of the deviation of the barrier height. V y V y V (x) = A + B , (6) 1 + y (1 + y)2 The effect of an inaccurate description of the barrier height by the basic potential is illus- VA + VB y = exp(αx). (7) trated in Fig. 1. If Vmax is varied from twice VB − VA to half the reference value while keeping the re- Here VA determines the exothermicity: while action energy and Tc (and, thus, ωb) constant, for large negative reaction coordinates x the po- the resulting rate constant at 140 K increases tential becomes zero, it approaches VA for large by 3 or decreases by almost 7 orders of magni- positive x. The maximum of V (x) is at x = 0 tude. The dual-level scheme (hollow symbols in and has the value the lower graph of Fig. 1) corrects for that very

2 accurately, with remaining errors of less than a (VA + VB) Vmax = . (8) factor of 3. A wrong barrier height is the typi- 4VB cal error of an approximate electronic structure

For the reﬁned potential we chose VA = −0.01 method. −1 Hartree (−26.3 kJ mol ) and Vmax = 0.01 By contrast, the case where the barrier height Hartree. These two parameters are varied in is preserved, but the exothermicity is described the following to describe diﬀerent basic poten- wrongly is shown in Fig. 2. Since the rate con- tials. The width α is adjusted in all cases such stant primarily depends on the barrier height rather than the shape of the barrier at the prod-

4 uct side, the changes caused in the rate constant are smaller. Especially if the basic potential predicts a too exothermic reaction, the inﬂu- ence on the rate constant is negligible. How- ever, when the basic potential describes the reaction energy to be too positive, we ﬁnd the ex- treme case where the dual-level approach fails, which can be seen from the lower graph of Fig. 2. Whenever the exothermicity is too low (VA − VA,ref > 0) the rate constant obtained by 0.010 the dual-level scheme is less accurate than the non-corrected basic rate constants. The rea- 0.005 son is that with a potential describing the re-

0.000 VA= action to be too endothermic, the distribution +0.001 of the images is shifted more to the product -0.005 0.000 -0.001 side, which can not be corrected by the dual-

) in Hartree -0.002 x ( -0.010 -0.003 level approach. The reﬁned potential energy V -0.005 -0.015 -0.01 (ref) of these images on the product side is then er- -0.02 roneously low, which leads to an underestima- -0.020 -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 tion of SE and an overestimation of the rate

x in aBohr constant. The cause of this diﬀerence is the basic potential change in the potential energy in the region of dual-level 10 the instanton, rather than in the product well. It should be noted that this is the most ex- treme case we found, and still the overall error is rather small. at 140 K

ref 1 k / k Reaction 1: The Isomerization HNC → HCN 0.1 -0.010 -0.005 0.000 0.005 0.010 The isomerization of HNC to HCN is a uni- V -V in Hartree A A,ref molecular prototype reaction with well-defined Figure 2: Effects of errors in the exothermic- reactant state structure (HNC) and prod- ity (−VA) on the rate constants. Top: Barrier uct state structure (HCN). Furthermore, the shapes for different values of VA, thicker lines in- three-atomic system is small enough to carry dicate instantons at 140 K. Bottom: Deviation out full conventional instanton calculations on of the rate constant as function of the deviation the CCSD(T)-F12/cc-pVDZ-F1249,52,56 level, of the exothermicity. which was used as the refined potential. For the basic potential, B3LYP57–62 was used in combination with the def2-SVP basis set.63 The reaction energies ∆V of basic and refined potential deviate by 5.4 kJ mol−1, see table 1. The potential activation barrier VA of B3LYP is higher than the CCSD(T)-F12 value by only 6.6 kJ mol−1. The crossover temperatures are also quite similar and deviate by just 15.9 K, that is ≈ 6 %. The IRCs were optimized for both potentials, see Fig. 3. Additionally, CCSD(T)-F12 en-

5 Table 1: Potential energy barriers VA, potential reaction energies ∆V and the respective values corrected by zero-point energy, EA, and ∆E for reaction 1: HNC → HCN. −1 Energies in kJ mol , Tc in K. Basic Potential Reﬁned potential Dual-level Method B3LYP CCSD(T)-F12 Basis set def2-SVP cc-pVDZ-F12 VA 142.8 136.2 136.2 ∆V −57.2 −62.6 −62.4 EA 128.9 123.5 122.4 ∆E −60.8 −65.5 −66.0 Tc 257.0 272.9

-12 ergy calculations were performed on the IRC 10 B3LYP -15 CCSD(T)-F12 optimized with B3LYP, shown as blue crosses 10

-1 -18 CCSD(T)-F12 // B3LYP 10 in Fig. 3. That potential energy curve coin- -21

in s 10 cides with the potential energy along the IRC k -24 10 of CCSD(T)-F12, indicating that the IRC ge- -27 10 ometries are similar. 1 10 0 10 150 -1 10 -2

CCSD(T)-F12 10 k

/ -3 100 k 10 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 -1 -1 -1 1000 T in K 50 Figure 4: Top: Rate constants for reaction 1

in kJ mol 0 with basic and reﬁned potential as well as the V B3LYP dual-level method. Bottom: relative error of CCSD(T)-F12 the rate constants with the basic potential and -50 CCSD(T)-F12 // B3LYP the dual-level method. The dotted line denotes -4 -2 0 2 4 k = k , i.e. no error. 1/2 CCSD(T)-F12 IRC in Bohr amu

Figure 3: Potential energy along the IRCs of that error to factors between 2.0 and 2.5, see reaction 1. Fig. 4 and, thus, leads to excellent agreement with the results obtained with full calculations Rate constants for reaction 1 are shown in on the refined potential. Fig. 4 as Arrhenius plots, i.e. the logarithm Using reaction 1 as an example we want to of the rate constant is plotted against 1/T . point out the savings in computational time: Rate constants were obtained by conventional The optimization of one instanton and the sub- instanton theory using both electronic poten- sequent rate calculation at CCSD(T)-F12a level tials as well as the CCSD(T)-F12 // B3LYP require 19,744 and 30,449 seconds, respectively. dual-level method. For B3LYP and the dual- On B3LYP level 626 and 1,305 seconds are re- level method, reaction rate constants down to quired for the instanton optimization and rate 60 K were calculated, for CCSD(T)-F12 down calculation on the same computer infrastruc- to only 100 K. Due to the higher activation ture. The additional CCSD(T)-F12a energy barrier, the B3LYP reaction rate constants are calculations for the dual-level approach require lower than the CCSD(T)-F12 reaction rate con- 323 seconds. Derivatives on the CCSD(T)-F12a stants by a factor of 51.4 at 200 K and by a fac- level were obtained from finite differences of en- tor of 961.1 at 100 K. The dual-level corrects ergies, while DFT gradients were calculated an-

6 200 alytically. Thus, in this comparison, the dual- BP86 BHLYP level approach saves a factor of > 20 in compu- BHLYP // BP86 BP86 // BHLYP tational time. 150 -1 Reaction 2: Intramolecular [1,5]- 100

H-Shift in kJ mol V 50 In sigmatropic rearrangements, tunneling was observed in many cases. Suprafacial 0 [1,5] sigmatropic rearrangements were stud- -5 0 5 ied exhaustively, using derivatives of 1,3(Z)- IRC in Bohr amu1/2 64,65 pentadiene. Although it was initially un- 250 BP86 clear whether or not atom tunneling plays a BHLYP BHLYP // BP86 crucial role in these reactions,66,67 various stud- 200 BP86 // BHLYP 16,25,65,68–72 ies have confirmed its involvement. -1 The [1,5] sigmatropic rearrangement of 1,3(Z)- 150 hexadiene to 2(E),4(Z)-hexadiene, Fig. 5, is 100 therefore an appropriate test system for the in kJ mol dual-level instanton method. V Two density functionals, the BP86 GGA 50 functional57–60,73 and the BHLYP hybrid func- 0 tional,57–61,74 both with the 6-31G* basis set,75 0 1 2 3 4 1/2 were applied to obtain different electronic po- instanton path length in Bohr amu tentials. Figure 6: Potential energy along the IRCs of This is a much more severe test for the dual- reaction 2 (top) and along instanton paths at level, because the potential activation energy 100K (bottom). obtained by BHLYP is more than 56.8 kJ mol−1 higher than the one obtained by BP86, see table 2. This is attributed to the high amount two functionals disagree, the reaction energies (50%) of exact exchange in the BHLYP func- agree within 2.8 kJ mol−1, see table 2. For tional. CCSD(T)-F12a calculations on the BH- both dual-level combinations, BHLYP // BP86 LYP (BP86) geometries resulted in VA = 149.1 and BP86 //BHLYP, the potential energy along kJ mol−1 (148.9 kJ mol−1) and ∆V = −11.3 the IRC is restored quite well, as can be seen kJ mol−1 (−11.4 kJ mol−1) implying that the in Fig. 6. The bottom graph of Fig. 6 shows BHLYP/6-31G* method yields more reliable re- the potential energy along instantons at 100K. sults than the BP86/6-31G* method. How- The energies are, again, well reproduced by the ever, the two functionals are eminently suitable dual-level approach. The lengths of the instan- to demonstrate the applicability of the dual- tons differ somewhat. Comparison of the up- level method in cases where the activation bar- per and the lower graph additionally shows that rier of the two functionals differ significantly. the instanton path leads to regions in configu- In this context, it has to be mentioned that, al- ration space with significantly higher potential though the activation barriers obtained by the energy than the classical transition state (203.4 vs 167.4 kJ mol−1 for BHLYP). This is caused by corner-cutting. Instanton rate constants were calculated for a temperature range from 300 K to 100 K using the two density functionals, as well as both dual-level combinations, see Fig. 7. The Figure 5: The [1,5] H shift in reaction 2. lower activation barrier of the BP86 poten-

7 Table 2: Potential energy barriers VA, potential reaction energies ∆V and the respective values corrected by zero-point energy, EA and ∆E for reaction 2. Energies are in −1 kJ mol , crossover temperatures Tc in K. Method BP86 BHLYP BP86 // BHLYP BHLYP // BP86 Basis set 6-31G* 6-31G* VA 110.6 167.4 109.8 166.3 ∆V −18.0 −15.2 −18.1 −15.3 EA 100.3 156.4 98.9 155.9 ∆E −18.9 −16.4 −19.3 −16.3 Tc 308.8 394.7

0 10 BP86 error in the exponential dominates the total er- -4 BHLYP ror, but is still counterbalanced by an opposite 10 BHLYP // BP86 BP86 // BHLYP deviation in the pre-exponential factor. 10-8 -12 -1 10 Table 3: Ratios of rate constants for re-

in s -16 action 2. k 10 -20 k k 10 kBP86 BHLYP//BP86 BP86//BHLYP kBHLYP kBHLYP kBP86 10-24 Max. 4.75 · 10+8 1.63 · 10−1 1.34 · 10−1 -28 Avg. 3.62 · 10+8 2.36 · 10−1 1.72 · 10−1 10 4 6 8 10 1000 T -1/ K-1

Figure 7: Rate constants for reaction 2. Reaction 3: Bimolecular Reaction NH2 + H2 → NH3 + H tial compared to the BHLYP potential leads to much higher reaction rate constants, by more Finally, the dual-level approach is tested on the than eight orders of magnitude, throughout the bimolecular hydrogen atom transfer reaction whole temperature range. The curvature of all NH2 + H2 → NH3 + H. This five-atomic sys- Arrhenius plots in Fig. 5, an indication of the tem with eleven electrons is small enough to be importance of tunneling, is strikingly similar easily handled fully on the CCSD(T)-F12/cc- even though the crossover temperatures differ pVDZ-F12 level using conventional instanton by more than 20 %. Despite the qualitative theory as refined potential. BHLYP/def2-SVP difference of both functionals, the results ob- was used as basic potential. tained with the dual-level instanton method re- On CCSD(T)-F12 level, the electronic reac- −1 produce the rate constants of the refined po- tion energy is −22.0 kJ mol , while the vi- tential successfully in both cases. The values brationally adiabatic reaction energy, i.e. the obtained by the dual-level approach agree with electronic energy plus zero-point vibrational en- −1 the full calculations of the respective refined po- ergy, is −8.0 kJ mol . During the reaction, tentials within one order of magnitude, see ta- an N–H bond is formed and a H–H bond is ble 3. There, the average and maximum de- broken, leading to a large difference in zero- viations (highest or lowest ratios) among the point vibrational energy between the reactants temperatures studied are shown. The small de- and products. The BP86 functional underesti- viations are mainly due to error compensation. mates the exothermicity with and without zero- For BHLYP // BP86, the underestimation of point energies. Thus, following from the results obtained for the Eckart barrier we would S0 is counterbalanced in the exponential term expect this case to be rather challenging for by an overestimation of Spot. The remaining the dual-level approach. In the region of the

8 Table 4: Potential energy barriers VA, potential reaction energies ∆V and the respective values corrected by zero-point energy, EA and ∆E for reaction 3. Energies are in −1 kJ mol , crossover temperatures Tc in K. Basic Potential Reﬁned Potential Dual-Level Method BHLYP CCSD(T)-F12 Basis set def2-SVP cc-pVDZ-F12 VA 35.5 41.5 40.7 ∆V −15.1 −22.0 −23.2 EA 44.2 48.8 49.3 ∆E −0.8 −8.0 −9.0 Tc 355.9 355.8

-16 transition structure, the CCSD(T)-F12 energy 10 BP86 -17 calculations along the IRC calculated on the 10 CCSD(T)-F12 -18 BP86 geometries resemble the energy along the 10 CCSD(T)-F12 // BP86 -19 CCSD(T)-F12-IRC well enough, however, see -1 10 s

3 -20 Fig. 8. 10 -21 10 60 in cm -22 BP86 k 10 CCSD(T)-F12 -23 CCSD(T)-F12 // BP86 10 -24 40 10

-1 -25 10 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 -1 -1 20 1000 T in K

in kJ mol Figure 9: Rate constants for reaction 3. V 0

-20 due to the underestimated exothermicity. To -4 -2 0 2 understand that, let us recall the case of the 1/2 IRC in Bohr amu Eckart barrier (Fig. 2). There, the potential energy is wrongly described on the right side Figure 8: Potential energy along the IRCs of re- of the potential energy barrier and affects the action 3 relative to the energy of the separated region of the instantons, leading to an incor- reactants. rect shape and in particular image distribution. This caused the dual-level approach to be un- The rate constants obtained with conven- suitable. In the case of reaction 3, the final reac- tional instanton theory and the corresponding tion energy is also described incorrectly. How- dual-level results are shown in Fig. 9. BP86 ever, the instanton is restricted to the region in leads to higher reaction rate constants by a space where the energy is higher than the en- factor of 9–12 than the CCSD(T)-F12 refer- ergy of the reactants, here to s < +0.4. There, ence throughout the temperature range of 300– the basic potential is sufficiently accurate and 110 K, caused by the lower activation barrier. the shape and image distribution of the instan- The dual-level method successfully leads to re- tons is not affected. Thus, the dual-level ap- action rate constants deviating only by a fac- proach is successful in this case. tor of less than 2 from the results obtained by conventional instanton theory using CCSD(T)- F12. This finding is quite surprising as we would have expected the dual-level approach to fail

9 Conclusion only if the region of the instantons is affected. Otherwise, the dual-level approach performs We demonstrated the applicability of a dual- well. Obviously, there may be other causes of level approach to instanton theory by studying errors like a wrongly predicted topology or sym- one analytic and three molecular systems. For metry of the stationary points predicted by the the dual-level instanton calculations, all opti- basic potential which we could not identify in mizations and Hessian calculations are carried the cases we tested. out using a basic potential, which is computa- In summary, the dual-level approach can help tionally fast, but can be rather approximate. improving the quality of instanton rate calcu- Additionally, energy calculations only are car- lations when the systems are too big for the ried out for all images using a more accurate full treatment with highly accurate electronic refined potential. We have shown that this ap- structure methods. It is a legitimate improve- proach corrects for the largest part of the errors ment as long as the basic potential describes in the rate constants by improving the value the chemical reaction qualitatively correct. of Spot in equation (5). The instanton geometry yinst, the distribution of the images, and therefore the value of S0 (see equation (1)) are Acknowledgments not changed and assumed to be described well enough by the basic potential. This work was financially supported by the Ger- The dual-level approach performs astonish- man Research Foundation (DFG) within the ingly well in the cases examined above. The Cluster of Excellence in Simulation Technology calculated rate constants are similar to the rate (EXC 310/2) at the University of Stuttgart. constants obtained by conventional instanton This work was financially supported by the calculations performed on the refined potential. European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and For the isomerization reaction of HNC to HCN, innovation programme (grant agreement No. the error with respect to full CCSD(T)-F12 re- 646717, TUNNELCHEM). sults is reduced from factors of 50–1000 when using B3LYP to 2.0–2.5 for the CCSD(T)-F12 // B3LYP dual-level instanton approach. References The method works well even in the case when (1) Langer, J. S. Theory of the condensation the activation barrier of the basic potential, one point. Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 1967, 41, 108– of the most crucial parameters when consider- 157. ing reaction rate constants, differs by more than 40% from the one obtained with the refined po- (2) Miller, W. H. Semiclassical limit of quan- tential, like in reaction 2. There, the dual-level tum mechanical transition state theory method reproduces the corresponding full in- for nonseparable systems. J. Chem. Phys. stanton rate constants within one order of mag- 1975, 62, 1899–1906. nitude while without the dual-level scheme they differ by more than eight orders of magnitude. (3) Coleman, S. Fate of the false vacuum: In cases where the exothermicity of the reac- Semiclassical theory. Phys. Rev. D 1977, tion is underestimated, the dual-level method 15, 2929–2936. suffers from a wrong image distribution and (4) Callan Jr., C. G.; Coleman, S. Fate of the hence can not correct for the errors in the po- false vacuum. II. First quantum correc- tential energy, as seen from the Eckart barrier. tions. Phys. Rev. D 1977, 16, 1762–1768. However, this problem can easily be probed by performing reference calculations for the reac- (5) Gildener, E.; Patrascioiu, A. Pseudoparti- tion energy. Furthermore it could be shown for cle contributions to the energy spectrum the reaction of NH2 and H2 that the wrong de- of a one-dimensional system. Phys. Rev. scription of the reaction energy is problematic D 1977, 16, 423–430.

10 (6) Mills, G.; G. K. Schenter, D. M.; (16) Meisner, J.; Kästner,J. Atom-Tunneling Jónsson,H. Classical and Quantum Dy- in Chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. namics in Condensed Phase Simulations; 2016, 55, 5400–5413. World Scientific, 1998; Chapter RAW Quantum Transition State Theory, p 405. (17) Mills, G.; Jónsson,H. Quantum and thermal effects in H2 dissociative adsorption: (7) Andersson, S.; Nyman, G.; Arnalds- Evaluation of free energy barriers in multi- son, A.; Manthe, U.; Jónsson,H. Compar- dimensional quantum systems. Phys. Rev. ison of Quantum Dynamics and Quantum Lett. 1994, 72, 1124–1127. Transition State Theory Estimates of the (18) Mills, G.; Schenter, G. K.; Makarov, D. E.; H + CH4 Reaction Rate. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 4468–4478. Jónsson, H. Generalized path integral based quantum transition state theory. (8) Richardson, J. O.; Althorpe, S. C. Ring- Chem. Phys. Lett. 1997, 278, 91–96. polymer molecular dynamics rate-theory in the deep-tunneling regime: Connec- (19) Goumans, T. P. M.; Kästner,J. Hydrogen- tion with semiclassical instanton theory. Atom Tunneling Could Contribute to H2 J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 131, 214106. Formation in Space. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 7350–7352. (9) Rommel, J. B.; Goumans, T. P. M.; Kästner,J. Locating instantons in many (20) Jónsson, H. Simulation of surface pro- degrees of freedom. J. Chem. Theory cesses. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, Comput. 2011, 7, 690–698. 108, 944–949.

(10) Rommel, J. B.; K¨astner,J. Adaptive inte- (21) Goumans, T. P. M. Hydrogen chemisorp- gration grids in instanton theory improve tion on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons the numerical accuracy at low tempera- via tunnelling. Mon. Notices Royal As- ture. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 134, 184107. tron. Soc. 2011, 415, 3129–3134.

(11) Richardson, J. O. Derivation of instanton (22) Goumans, T. P. M.; Kästner, J. rate theory from first principles. J. Chem. Deuterium Enrichment of Interstellar Phys. 2016, 144, 114106. Methanol Explained by Atom Tunneling. J. Phys. Chem. A 2011, 115, 10767. (12) Richardson, J. O. Microcanonical and thermal instanton rate theory for chemi- (23) Meisner, J.; Rommel, J. B.; Kästner,J. cal reactions at all temperatures. Faraday Kinetic isotope effects calculated with Discuss. 2016, 195, 49–67. the instanton method. J. Comput. Chem. 2011, 32, 3456–3463. (13) McConnell, S. R.; Löhle,A.; Kästner,J. ´ Rate constants from instanton theory (24) Alvarez-Barcia, S.; Flores, J. R.; via a microcanonical approach. J. Chem. Kästner, J. Tunneling Above the Phys. 2017, 146, 074105. Crossover Temperature. J. Phys. Chem. A 2014, 118, 78–82. (14) McConnell, S.; Kästner,J. Instanton rate constant calculations close to and above (25) Kryvohuz, M. Calculation of Kinetic Iso- the crossover temperature. J. Comput. tope Effects for Intramolecular Hydro- Chem. 2017, 38, 2570–2580. gen Shift Reactions Using Semiclassical Instanton Approach. J. Phys. Chem. A (15) Kästner, J. Theory and Simulation of 2014, 118, 535–544. Atom Tunneling in Chemical Reactions. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2014, 4, 158– (26) Richardson, J. O.; Pérez,C.; Lobsiger, S.; 168. Reid, A. A.; Temelso, B.; Shields, G. C.;

11 Kisiel, Z.; Wales, D. J.; Pate, B. H.; Al- path for the proton transfer in malonalde- thorpe, S. C. Concerted hydrogen-bond hyde. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 1962– breaking by quantum tunneling in the wa- 1966. ter hexamer prism. Science 2016, 351, 1310–1313. (35) Tautermann, C. S.; Voegele, A. F.; Loert- ing, T.; Liedl, K. R. An accurate semi- (27) Beyer, A. N.; Richardson, J. O.; classical method to predict ground-state Knowles, P. J.; Rommel, J.; Al- tunneling splittings. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, thorpe, S. C. Quantum Tunneling Rates 117, 1967–1974. of Gas-Phase Reactions from On-the-Fly Instanton Calculations. J. Phys. Chem. (36) Rommel, J. B.; Liu, Y.; Werner, H.-J.; Lett. 2016, 7, 4374–4379. Kästner,J. Role of Tunneling in the En- zyme Glutamate Mutase. J. Phys. Chem. (28) Song, L.; Kästner,J. Formation of the pre- B 2012, 116, 13682–13689. biotic molecule NH2CHO on astronomical amorphous solid water surfaces: accurate (37) Zhang, Y.; Rommel, J. B.; Cvitaˇs,M. T.; tunneling rate calculations. Phys. Chem. Althorpe, S. C. Shallow-tunnelling cor- Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 29278–29285. rection factor for use with Wigner-Eyring transition-state theory. Phys. Chem. (29) Lamberts, T.; Fedoseev, G.; Kästner,J.; Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 24292–24300. Ioppolo, S.; Linnartz, H. Importance of tunneling in H-abstraction reactions by (38) Corchado, J. C.; Espinosa-Garc´ıa, J.; Roberto-Neto, O.; Chuang, Y.-Y.; Truh- OH radicals - The case of CH4 + OH studied through isotope-substituted analogs. lar, D. G. Dual-Level Direct Dynamics Astron. Astrophys. 2017, 599, A132. Calculations of the Reaction Rates for a Jahn-Teller Reaction: Hydrogen Abstrac- 3 (30) Lamberts, T.; Kästner,J. Influence of Sur- tionfrom CH4 or CD4 by O( P). J. Phys. face and Bulk Water Ice on the Reactivity Chem. A 1998, 102, 4899–4910. of a Water-forming Reaction. Astrophys. J. 2017, 846, 43. (39) Sekuˇsak,S.; Cory, M. G.; Bartlett, R. J.; Sabljić, A. Dual-Level Direct Dynamics (31) Song, L.; Kästner,J. Tunneling rate con- of the Hydroxyl Radical Reaction with stants for H2CO + H on amorphous solid Ethane and Haloethanes: Toward a Gen- water surfaces. Astrophys. J. 2017, 850, eral Reaction Parameter Method. J. Phys. 118. Chem. A 1999, 103, 11394–11405.

(32) Siebrand, W.; Smedarchina, Z.; Zgier- (40) Huang, C.-H.; Tsai, L.-C.; Hu, W.-P. ski, M. Z.; Fernandez-RAMOS, A. Pro- Dual-Level Direct Dynamics Study on the ton tunnelling in polyatomic molecules: A Diels-Alder Reaction of Ethylene and 1,3- direct-dynamics instanton approach. Int. Butadiene. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, Rev. Phys. Chem. 1999, 18, 5–41. 9945–9953.

(33) Smedarchina, Z.; Fernandez-Ramos, A.; (41) Pflüger,K.; Paulus, M.; Jagiella, S.; Burk- Rios, M. A. A comparison of two methods ert, T.; Rauhut, G. Multi-level vibrational for direct tunneling dynamics: Hydrogen SCF calculations and FTIR measurements exchange in the glycolate anion as a test on furazan. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2005, 114, case. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 106, 3956– 327–332. 3964. (42) Smedarchina, Z.; Siebrand, W.; (34) Tautermann, C. S.; Voegele, A. F.; Loert- Fernández-Ramos, A. The rainbow ing, T.; Liedl, K. R. The optimal tunneling instanton method: A new approach to

12 tunneling splitting in polyatomics. J. Efficient removal of the basis set incom- Chem. Phys. 2012, 137, 224105. pleteness and domain errors. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 130, 241101. (43) Mil’nikov, G. V.; Yagi, K.; Taketsugu, T.; Nakamura, H.; Hirao, K. Tunneling split- (51) Werner, H.-J.; Knowles, P. J.; Knizia, G.; ting in polyatomic molecules: Application Manby, F. R.; Schütz, M. Molpro: a to malonaldehyde. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, general-purpose quantum chemistry pro- 119, 10–13. gram package. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2012, 2, 242–253. (44) Mil’nikov, G. V.; Yagi, K.; Taketsugu, T.; Nakamura, H.; Hirao, K. Simple and accu- (52) Peterson, K. A.; Adler, T. B.; Werner, H.- rate method to evaluate tunneling split- J. Systematically convergent basis sets for ting in polyatomic molecules. J. Chem. explicitly correlated wavefunctions: The Phys. 2004, 120, 5036–5045. atoms H, He, B–Ne, and Al–Ar. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 128, 084102. (45) Kästner,J.; Carr, J. M.; Keal, T. W.; Thiel, W.; Wander, A.; Sherwood, P. DL- (53) TURBOMOLE V, a development of Uni- FIND: an Open-Source Geometry Opti- versity of Karlsruhe and Forschungszen- mizer for Atomistic Simulations. J. Phys. trum Karlsruhe GmbH, 1989-2007, TUR- Chem. A 2009, 113, 11856. BOMOLE GmbH, since 2007; available from http://www.turbomole.com. (46) Sherwood, P.; de Vries, A. H.; Guest, M. F.; Schreckenbach, G.; Cat- (54) Eichkorn, K.; Weigend, F.; Treutler, O.; low, C. R. A.; French, S. A.; Sokol, A. A.; Ahlrichs, R. Auxiliary basis sets for main Bromley, S. T.; Thiel, W.; Turner, A. J. row atoms and transition metals and their et al. QUASI: A general purpose imple- use to approximate Coulomb potentials. mentation of the QM/MM approach and Theor. Chem. Acc. 1997, 97, 119–124. its application to problems in catalysis. J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM) 2003, 632, (55) Eckart, C. The Penetration of a Potential 1–28. Barrier by Electrons. Phys. Rev. 1930, 35, 1303–1309. (47) Metz, S.; Kästner, J.; Sokol, A. A.; Keal, T. W.; Sherwood, P. ChemShell— (56) Knizia, G.; Adler, T. B.; Werner, H.-J. a modular software package for QM/MM Simplified CCSD(T)-F12 methods: The- simulations. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. ory and benchmarks. J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 4, 101–110. 2009, 130, 054104.

(48) Meisner, J.; Markmeyer, M. N.; (57) Dirac, P. Quantum Mechanics of Many- Bohner, M. U.; K¨astner, J. Compar- Electron Systems. Proc. Royal Soc. (Lon- ison of classical reaction paths and don) A 1929, 123, 714–733. tunneling paths studied with the semi- (58) Slater, J. A simpliﬁcation of the Hartree- classical instanton theory. Phys. Chem. Fock method. Phys. Rev. 1951, 81, 385– Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 23085–23094. 390.

(49) Adler, T. B.; Knizia, G.; Werner, H.-J. (59) Vosko, S. H.; Wilk, L.; Nusair, M. Accu- A simple and eﬃcient CCSD(T)-F12 ap- rate spin-dependent electron liquid corre- proximation. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 127, lation energies for local spin density calcu- 221106. lations: a critical analysis. Can. J. Phys. (50) Adler, T. B.; Werner, H.-J. Local explic- 1980, 58, 1200–1211. itly correlated coupled-cluster methods:

13 (60) Becke, A. Density-functional exchange- of the kinetic isotope eﬀects: Application energy approximation with correct asymp- to the intramolecular hydrogen transfer in totic behavior. Phys. Rev. A 1988, 38, pentadiene. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 127, 3098–3100. 114309.

(61) Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Devel- (69) Shelton, G. R.; Hrovat, D. A.; Bor- opment of the Colle-Salvetti correlation- den, W. T. Tunneling in the 1,5-Hydrogen energy formula into a functional of the Shift Reactions of 1,3-Cyclopentadiene electron density. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, and 5-Methyl-1,3-Cyclopentadiene. J. 785–789. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 164–168.

(62) Becke, A. D. Density-functional thermo- (70) Peles, D. N.; Thoburn, J. D. Multidimen- chemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. sional Tunneling in the [1,5] Shift in (Z)- J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648. 1,3-Pentadiene: How Useful Are Swain– Schaad Exponents at Detecting Tunnel- (63) Weigend, F.; Ahlrichs, R. Balanced basis ing. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 3135–3144. sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to (71) Zimmermann, T.; Van´ıˇcek,J. Three ap- Rn: Design and assessment of accuracy. plications of path integrals: equilibrium Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005, 7, 3297– and kinetic isotope effects, and the tem- 3305. perature dependence of the rate constant of the [1,5] sigmatropic hydrogen shift in (64) Dormans, G. J. M.; Buck, H. M. The (Z)-1,3-pentadiene. J. Mol. Model. 2010, mechanism of the thermal [1,5]-H shift 16, 1779–1787. in cis-1,3-pentadiene. Kinetic isotope effect and vibrationally assisted tunneling. (72) Kryvohuz, M.; Marcus, R. A. Semiclassi- J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 3253–3258. cal evaluation of kinetic isotope effects in 13-atomic system. J. Chem. Phys 2012, (65) Liu, Y. P.; Lynch, G. C.; Truong, T. N.; 137, 134107. Lu, D.; Truhlar, D. G.; Garrett, B. C. Molecular modeling of the kinetic isotope (73) Perdew, J. P. Density-functional approx- effect for the [1,5]-sigmatropic rearrange- imation for the correlation energy of the ment of cis-1,3-pentadiene. J. Am. Chem. inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. B Soc. 1993, 115, 2408–2415. 1986, 33, 8822–8824.

(66) Doering, W. v. E.; Zhao, X. Ef- (74) Becke, A. D. A new mixing of Hartree- fect on Kinetics by Deuterium in Fock and local density-functional theories. the 1,5-Hydrogen Shift of a Cisoid- J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 1372–1377. Locked 1,3(Z)-Pentadiene, 2-Methyl- 10-methylenebicyclo[4.4.0]dec-1-ene: (75) Hariharan, P. C.; Pople, J. A. The influ- Evidence for Tunneling? J. Am. Chem. ence of polarization functions on molecu- Soc. 2006, 128, 9080–9085. lar orbital hydrogenation energies. Theor. Chim. Acta 1973, 28, 213–222. (67) Doering, W. v. E.; Keliher, E. J. Effect of Deuterium on the Kinetics of 1,5- Hydrogen Shifts: 5-Dideuteriomethylene- 2,4,6,7,9-pentamethyl-11,11a- dihydro- 12H-naphthacene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 2488–2495. (68) Van´ıˇcek,J.; Miller, W. H. Efficient esti- mators for quantum instanton evaluation

14 TOC Graphic

fast method accurate method

log (rate constant) dual-level (fast and accurate) 1 / temperature