History, Choice, and Reflection in Robert Penn Warren's

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

History, Choice, and Reflection in Robert Penn Warren's HISTORY, CHOICE, AND REFLECTION IN ROBERT PENN WARREN 'S " AMERICANA TRILOGY"1 [a] Copyright 2004 Steven D. Ealy Time, history, poetry, and identity are intertwined in the thought and writings of Robert Penn Warren. These interconnections are famously encapsulated in Warren 's foreword to Brother to Dragons: "If poetry is the little myth we make, history is the big myth we live."i [1] This paper will deal with these themes as found in three of Warren 's long poems, Brother to Dragons, Audubon: A Vision,ii [2] and Chief Joseph of the Nez Perce.iii [3] These poems, for all of their differences in theme and style, share certain characteristics that this paper will highlight. 1) Each poem has, as its title character, an archetypal American. In the case of Brother to Dragons, that character is Thomas Jefferson, author of the Declaration of Independence and the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, and father of the University of Virginia . (BD I, p. 2) "Audubon" is Jean Jacques, or John James, remembered chiefly for his Birds of America. Chief Joseph was one of the leaders of the "non-treaty Nez Perce" who led his tribe from their traditional home in the Wallowa Valley of Oregon Territory on a thousand mile trek to freedom headed for Canada, only to be captured by the US Cavalry within 50 miles of the Canadian border, and who came to symbolize the Nez Perce struggle in the popular mind. 2) Each poem features the layering of time, with aspects of the contemporary American landscape or map overlaying that of the earlier period. 3) Each poem includes among its cast of characters 1 [a] Prepared for delivery on the panel "Time of the Tale: Being in Flux and Modern Literature" at the 2004 Eric Voegelin Society Annual Meeting, Chicago , Illinois , September 1-5, 2004 . the author of the poem, Robert Penn Warren, who either interacts with or reflects on the poem's title figure. 4) Each poem contains a meditation on history, identity, and time. Brother to Dragonsiv [4] This poem occupied, or preoccupied, Warren for over two decades. Brother to Dragons, "A Tale in Verse and Voices," was originally published in book form in 1953. As Warren makes clear in a prefatory note, it is "a dialogue spoken by characters, but it is not a play." (BD, 1953, p. xiii) In 1979, "a new version,"v [5] considerably tightened, was published. In this version Warren reiterates even more strongly than in the original that the poem is not a play. (BD II, p. xv) Between the appearance of these two versions of the poem, Warren published Brother to Dragons as "a play in two acts" in The Georgia Review.vi [6] The "tale" told in Brother to Dragons is both grisly and melodramatic. Lucy Jefferson, younger sister of Thomas Jefferson, married colonelvii [7] Charles Lewis. Lewis moved his family, including sons Lilburne and Isham (the younger by a dozen or so years) and his slaves, from Albemarle County , Virginia , to an estate along the Ohio River west of Louisville , Kentucky . Shortly after this relocation Lucy died, and Charles Lewis spent much of his time away from Rocky Hill, leaving Lilburne in charge. On the night of December 15, 1811 ,viii [8] Lilburne and Isham, in front of their assembled slaves, used a butcher axe to kill and dismember a young slave for having broken a favorite pitcher of their dead mother. This murder eventually came to the attention of local authorities, and Lilburne and Isham were indicted, arrested, and released on bail to await trial. They agreed to avoid trial by engaging in mutually assisted suicide by shooting (in one version of the story, over the grave of their mother). But this plan went awry when Lilburne was shot and killed prematurely, either through his own hand or that of Isham. Isham was detained for the murder of his brother, but escaped from jail and disappeared. Legend has it that Isham joined Andrew Jackson's forces and fought with Jackson at the Battle of New Orleans, where he was fatally wounded, and that he was recognized as he lay dying. While this brutal murder and the bizarre series of events that flow from it provide the backdrop for Warren 's poem, the real action of the poem is the encounter between the principals of the historic events and "R. P. W.," the "writer of this poem" who also serves as interlocutor. This encounter between R. P. W. and the shades of the past is set in "no place" at "any time." (BD I, pp. 2-3; BD II, pp. 2-3). This particular, and peculiar, placement in time and space is another way of saying, according to Warren , "that the issues that the characters . discuss are . a human constant" (BD II, p. xv). Warren is especially interested in understanding how the murder committed by Jefferson 's sister's sons--his nephews--affected Jefferson 's understanding of human nature. This matter of understanding Jefferson 's reaction is complicated by the fact that there is no evidence that Jefferson ever commented on the incident.ix [9] Jefferson opens the revised version of Brother to Dragons by claiming that he "Cannot, though dead, set/My mouth to the dark stream that I may unknow/All my knowing." (BD II, p. 5) He had set his knowledge against his hope: "I tried to bring myself to say:/Knowledge is only incidental, hope is all--/Hope, a dry acorn, but some green germx [10] /May split it yet, then joy and the summer shade." (BD II, p. 5) He seeks shelter from his knowledge--his shelter seems to be "senility/And moments of indulgent fiction"--so that he "might try/To defend my old definition of man." (BD II, p. 5) Jefferson 's "old definition of man" is the "vision" contained in the Declaration of Independence, a vision of man in which both liberty and equality are maximized, and reason rules all. "In Philadelphia first it came, my heart/Shook, shamefast in glory, and I saw, I saw-- /But I'll tell you quietly, in system, what I saw." (BD II, p. 5) At this point in the poem Jefferson loses his train of thought in a nightmare vision of the Minotaur, but soon returns to his narrative. To begin again. When I to Philadelphia came I knew what the world was. Oh, I wasn't That ilk of fool! Then when I saw individual evil, I rationally said, it is only provisional paradox To resolve itself in Time. Oh, easy, Plump-bellied comfort! Philadelphia , yes. I knew we were only men, Defined in errors and interests. But I, a man too-- Yes, laugh if you will--stumbled into The breathless awe of vision, saw sudden On every face, face after face, Bleared, puffed, lank, lean red-fleshed or sallow, all-- On all saw the brightness blaze, And knew my own days, Times, hopes, horsemanship, respect of peers, Delight, desire, and even my love, but straw Fit for the flame, and in that fierce combustion, I-- Why, I was nothing, nothing but joy, And my heart cried out: "Oh, this is Man!" (BD II, p. 7) Jefferson 's hopeful definition of man required that one "leap beyond" man's natural limits (physical, moral, and spiritual, I would suggest) as found in the historical world in order "To find justification in a goal/Hypothesized in Nature." (BD II, p. 8) Jefferson 's reorienting comment, "To begin again," which was designed to get himself back on the subject at hand, has a double meaning. He has become confused and strayed from his topic and must start over. But from the perspective of many, Philadelphia --representative of the hope for mankind in the New World more generally--was an opportunity to begin the human experience again. The soon-to- be-new-nation was, after all, the last, best hope for all mankind. The vision of man embodied in the Declaration of Independence held open the possibility of setting aside human history and starting over again, and it's grandeur blinded Jefferson (and perhaps other members of the Continental Congress--"delegates by accident, in essence men,/Marmosets in mantles, beasts in boots, parrots in pantaloons,/That is to say, men." [BD II, pp. 5-6]) to the bestial side of man's nature. Jefferson continues: But No beast then, the towering Definition, angelic, arrogant, abstract, Greaved in glory, thewed with light, the bright Brow tall as dawn. I could not see the eyes. So seized the pen, and in the upper room, With the excited consciousness that I was somehow Rectified, annealed, my past annulled And fate confirmed. Time came, we signed the document, went home. I had not seen the eyes of that bright apparition. I had been blind with light. I did not know its eyes were blind. (BD II, p. 8) Jefferson was blinded not only by the grandeur of this vision of man, but also by the possibilities of the American West--"my West" as he calls the new frontier in this poem. Because of the importance of this new land to him, Jefferson decides to have his nephew Meriwether Lewis--who is in many ways his spiritual son--lead the expedition of discovery: "But my own blood will go/To name and chart and set the human foot." (BD II, p. 9) As the discussion of Chief Joseph will show, Warren deals with the fact that "the human foot" had already trod upon this territory, and not the human foot of Spanish and French explorers only, but that of many native Indian tribes.
Recommended publications
  • MENG 6510: Eminent Writers, Ralph Waldo Emerson Instructor
    Course Syllabus: MENG 6510: Eminent Writers, Ralph Waldo Emerson Instructor: Dr. John Schwiebert Office: EH #457 Phone: 626-6289 e-mail: [email protected] Office hours: XXX, or by appointment Course Overview Ralph Waldo Emerson was the central figure in the American Literary Renaissance of the middle nineteenth century. Numerous writers, American and worldwide, then and since, have felt his influence, and many of his ideas have become mainstays of the American vocabulary. For instance, Emerson popularized the term “self-reliance,” and much of what is best and most enduring in American intellectual history has affinities with ideas in his essays, poems, journals, and other writings. Emerson’s main interest, throughout his life, was in processes: natural and physical processes, creative processes, and spiritual; how to read, how to write, how to think and grow, and above all, how to live. In Emerson’s view nothing is static, least of all his own writings. A course in Emerson cannot properly be limited to Emerson as a “subject,” because for Emerson the “subject” was always living people, e.g, you and me, who are tasked with the challenge of creating their own lives out of a living past. Accordingly, we will treat Emerson’s works less as ends in themselves than as means to our own intellectual growth and creativity. To live the Emersonian life is to live your own life; to study Emerson is to do your own work. Required Course Texts and Supplies • Emerson, Ralph Waldo. Ralph Waldo Emerson: Essays & Poems. Ed. Harold Bloom, Paul Kane, and Joel Porte.
    [Show full text]
  • Philip Roth, Henry Roth and the History of the Jews
    CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture ISSN 1481-4374 Purdue University Press ©Purdue University Volume 16 (2014) Issue 2 Article 9 Philip Roth, Henry Roth and the History of the Jews Timothy Parrish Florida State University Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb Part of the American Literature Commons, Comparative Literature Commons, Jewish Studies Commons, Modern Literature Commons, and the Other Arts and Humanities Commons Dedicated to the dissemination of scholarly and professional information, Purdue University Press selects, develops, and distributes quality resources in several key subject areas for which its parent university is famous, including business, technology, health, veterinary medicine, and other selected disciplines in the humanities and sciences. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, the peer-reviewed, full-text, and open-access learned journal in the humanities and social sciences, publishes new scholarship following tenets of the discipline of comparative literature and the field of cultural studies designated as "comparative cultural studies." Publications in the journal are indexed in the Annual Bibliography of English Language and Literature (Chadwyck-Healey), the Arts and Humanities Citation Index (Thomson Reuters ISI), the Humanities Index (Wilson), Humanities International Complete (EBSCO), the International Bibliography of the Modern Language Association of America, and Scopus (Elsevier). The journal is affiliated with the Purdue University Press monograph series of Books in Comparative Cultural Studies. Contact: <[email protected]> Recommended Citation Parrish, Timothy. "Philip Roth, Henry Roth and the History of the Jews." CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 16.2 (2014): <https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.2411> This text has been double-blind peer reviewed by 2+1 experts in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • From Tracing to Writing: the Maps That Thoreau Copied Julien Nègre
    From Tracing to Writing: The Maps that Thoreau Copied Julien Nègre To cite this version: Julien Nègre. From Tracing to Writing: The Maps that Thoreau Copied. Nineteenth Century Prose, UNITED STATES NINETEENTH-CENTURY PROSE, 2017, 44 (2), pp.213-234. hal-01625914 HAL Id: hal-01625914 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01625914 Submitted on 29 Oct 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Nègre 1 From Tracing to Writing: the Maps that Thoreau Copied Julien Nègre ENS de Lyon, Université de Lyon – France (IHRIM-CNRS) There is a place in Concord, Massachusetts, called Beck Stow’s swamp. No need to take out your map and look at it: it won’t appear on a traditional USGS map and a search on Google Maps will yield no result. Beck Stow’s swamp is somewhere out there, but it is located on a different plane of existence. The swamp does appear on some maps, but they belong to a very specific category: those reproduced at the end of certain editions of Thoreau’s works. The name of the swamp will indeed be familiar to his readers, as he evokes it several times in his writing, especially his Journal1.
    [Show full text]
  • Canonicity and the American Public Library: the Case of American Women Writers
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and... Canonicity and the American Public Library: The Case of American Women Writers Sarah Wadsworth Abstract Beginning with an overview of the debate over American women writers and the academic canon, this essay inventories four clusters of American women writers—domestic novelists, regionalists, mod- ernists, and writers of diverse ethnicities—within a representative sampling of small-town public libraries across the Midwest from the late nineteenth to the mid-twentieth century. The survey reveals some surprising disjunctures that run counter to trends in the academy. It also highlights the role publishers and bibliographers have played in establishing favored texts for a general readership and demon- strates that publishers of literary classics and bibliographies geared toward librarians have not always promoted the same texts as their academic counterparts. On the whole, it concludes, women writ- ers fared quite well in the hands of publishers and public libraries promoting “the classics” at the same time that they suffered at the hands of major textbook publishers and scholarly editors intent on defining “the canon.” At the 1981 Modern Language Association annual convention, a “New American Literary History” forum sponsored a special session on the topic “A New American Literature Anthology.” Led by Judith Fetterley and Joan Schulz of the MLA’s Commission on the Status of Women, the session sparked a lively dialogue on the neglect of women writers in Amer- ican literature. The commission had recently undertaken a study of the representation of works by women in standard classroom anthologies, and the results were discouraging.
    [Show full text]
  • Typee: a Peep at Polynesian Life PDF Book
    TYPEE: A PEEP AT POLYNESIAN LIFE PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Herman Melville,John Bryant | 304 pages | 01 Dec 2000 | Penguin Putnam Inc | 9780140434880 | English | New York, NY, United States Typee: A Peep at Polynesian Life PDF Book The belief in its genuineness therefore is much like the ocean, for it ebbs and flows. You can find your place again and put that ribbon in the right spot. Want to Read saving…. Book did not hold together for me. Typee lacks the narrative drive of Dick, but, like that other great 19th century chronicler of human ills, Dickens, Melville is such an outstanding prose-maker that you tend to overlook the flaws. There are many wonderfully exasperating discussions. But the most impressive The right word is captivating. By the time of his death he had been almost completely forgotten, but his longest novel, Moby Dick — largely considered a failure during his lifetime, and most responsible for Melville's fall from favor with the reading public — was rediscovered in the 20th century as one of the chief literary masterpieces of both American and world literature. The irony is further enhanced when we learn that it's no Euro-friendly group of Polynesian savages upon whom he falls among, but rather the dreadfully feared "Typee", whose appetite for cannibalism causes even the average-Joe-kind-of-cannibal to quake. This scholarly edition is based on collations of all editions published during his lifetime, incorporating many authorial readings that have often been omitted and some that have been misprinted in all previous editions. Trivia About Typee: A Peep at The missionaries may seek to disguise the matter as they will, but the facts are incontrovertible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Library of America Interviews Christopher Carduff About William Maxwell
    The Library of America interviews Christopher Carduff about William Maxwell In connection with the publication in January 2008 of William Maxwell: Early Novels & Stories , edited by Christopher Carduff, Rich Kelley con - ducted this exclusive interview for The Library of America e-Newsletter. Sign up for the free monthly e-Newsletter at www.loa.org . Born in 1908, William Maxwell lived to the age of 91, and was still publish - ing in his 80s, which explains how The Library of America can publish a volume called Early Novels and Stories that includes pieces he wrote at 47. It includes four of his six novels and nine of his stories. How do these early works compare with those of Maxwell’s later years? And does The Library of America plan to publish a second volume of his works? Actually, Maxwell was publishing right into his 90s—he had fiction in The New Yorker and DoubleTake in his 90th year—and he began writing early: his first novel was published when he was 25. In the coming year the LOA, to honor both the centenary of his birth and his remarkable 65-year contribution to American writing, will publish a two-volume edition of his fiction, which will bring together all the novels and 27 of his best short stories. The second volume , Later Novels and Stories— due out in the fall of 2008—will also include a generous selection of Maxwell’s “improvisations,” or literary fairy tales, most of which he wrote as Christmas and birthday gifts to his wife throughout their 45 years together.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unfinished Business of Philip Roth
    The Unfinished Business of Philip Roth Ira Nadel While the complete works of Philip Roth exist in ten volumes from the Library of America and the majority of his novels remain in print as trade paperbacks, we lack the complete story of his life. This was a problem for Roth, who spent his final years outlining his life story. Eager to rebut Claire Bloom’s 1996 memoir, Leaving a Doll’s House, Roth hired a biographer, Ross Miller, but the arrangement proved unsatisfactory. By 2012, he’d chosen a replacement, preparing a series of lengthy documents showing exactly how he wanted his life presented. His story would have an ending, but it would be one he wrote. As the narrator in Alan Lelchuk’s satirical novel Between his “retirement,” in 2010, and his death, on May about Roth, Ziff: A Life? (2003) asks, “Can Ziff have it 22, 2018, Roth prepared file after file for his new biogra- both ways?” Roth emphatically answered “yes.” pher Blake Bailey, each with a memorandum on how to read and use the material. He also prepared a series of Roth had a fictional precedent: his 1986 novel The private documents that outlined in detail what informa- Counterlife, where Henry Zuckerman, brother of Nathan tion should and should not be included. Several of their Zuckerman, Roth’s alter ego, dies on the operating table headings are “Money,” “Marriage a la Mode,” “Pain and but remarkably comes back. Henry starts as a dentist in Illness History,” and a lengthy “Notes for My Biographer” New Jersey, but once revived, becomes a militant settler (over three hundred pages).
    [Show full text]
  • The Library of America Interviews Brad Gooch About Flannery O’Connor
    The Library of America interviews Brad Gooch about Flannery O’Connor In February 2009 Little Brown & Company published Flannery: A Life of Flannery O’Connor by Brad Gooch, the first major biography of the writer since her death. In connection with The Library of America’s 1988 definitive edition of Flannery O’Connor: Collected Works , Rich Kelley conducted this exclusive interview for The Library of America e-Newsletter. Sign up for the free monthly e-Newsletter at www.loa.org . In a recent review in The New York Review of Books of a number of works by or about Flannery O’Connor, including your biography, Joyce Carol Oates notes that “in 2008, the Modern Language Association catalogued 1,340 entries under ‘Flannery O’Connor,’ including 195 doctoral disserta - tions and several book-length studies .” She also remarks that “no postwar and posthumous literary reputation of the twentieth century, with the notable exception of Sylvia Plath, has grown more rapidly and dramati - cally than that of O’Connor, whose work has acquired a canonical status since her death in 1964.” What is it about her work that today’s readers and scholars find so appealing ? Flannery O’Connor truly does seem to have found her moment with us in the 21st century. I am always struck by how many of her stories read as if they were written just last week. Those short, abrupt sentences, which appeared preternaturally “plain” when she wrote them, now seem pitch-perfect in their blunt directness. They give us the news that we need to hear.
    [Show full text]
  • Steinbeck and Censorship 29
    STEINBECK AND CENSORSHIP 29 Steinbeck and Censorship Robert E. Morsberger California State Polytechnic University, Pomona In 2002, Steinbeck’s centennial year, everyone in California was urged to read The Grapes of Wrath, libraries throughout the state were having programs on Steinbeck, and there was an enormous Steinbeck conference at Hofstra University. But when The Grapes of Wrath was published in 1939, there was an intense effort to ban the novel and its film version and to vilify, discredit, and damage the author. Steinbeck is still one of the chief targets of censors, but in addition to attacks for political and allegedly moral reasons, he is also discredited by part of the literary establishment that wants to eliminate him from canonical literature. The Grapes of Wrath became the best seller of 1939 and ’40 and won the Pulitzer Prize, but it was also widely condemned, outraging some who considered it unAmerican in its refutation of the American Dream that anyone can become a success, in its criticism of cutthroat capitalism, the banks, the agribusiness of the Associated Farmers, the venality of used car dealers and buyers of household goods from the desperate. There were also protests about some of the coarse dialogue and details in the novel, which Congressman Lyle Boren of Oklahoma denounced before the House of Representatives as “a lie, a black, infernal creation of a twisted, distorted mind.” In America, when injustice was exposed, the messenger got blamed. The Associated Farmers, the banks, the agribusinessmen, the vested interests slandered Steinbeck with every distortion they could think up. Steinbeck wrote, “The Associated Farmers have begun an hysterical personal attack on me both in the papers and a whispering campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • Putting the Dynamic Past to Everyday Use in the Fiction of Southern Women Writers* Constante González Groba University of Santiago De Compostela, Spain
    Putting the Dynamic Past to Everyday Use in the Fiction of Southern Women Writers* Constante González Groba University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain Abstract From its beginnings American literature has displayed an ambivalent coexistence of the idealistic impulse to eradicate the past and a conservative reverence for it as a sacred guide for the present and the future. Southern writers have traditionally stood out for their love-hate relationship with their region’s past. This essay traces some of the ambivalences with respect to the past in southern women writers. Both Ellen Glasgow and Bobbie Ann Mason, from different periods and backgrounds, initially made their break with the past and tradition central to their identity as writers. Glasgow came to reject modern values later in her career, whereas Mason has recently become much tamer in her rejection of the past and has come to cherish the family tradition as a source of personal renewal and as a guide for the present. Other contemporary southern women writers, like Lee Smith or Alice Walker, also see the past not as an altar on which to expiate the guilt of their region’s history but as something directly related to them and as a useful source of renewal for their present lives and those of their characters. Keywords American South; southern fiction; southern women writers; Ellen Glasgow; Bobbie Ann Mason; Lee Smith From its very beginnings, American literature has carried within it an ambivalent coexistence of the idealistic impulse to eradicate the past and the conservative practice of revering it as a repository and guide for the present and the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Harriet Beecher Stowe
    The Library of America interviews Joan D. Hedrick about Harriet Beecher Stowe In connection with the bicentennial of Harriet Beecher Stowe, Rich Kelley conducted this exclusive interview with Joan D. Hedrick, author of the Pulitzer Prize–winning biography, Harriet Beecher Stowe: A Life . Sign up for The Library of America’s free monthly e-Newsletter at www.loa.org . Uncle Tom’s Cabin stands as one of the most influential books ever pub - lished in America. In his essay on Harriet Beecher Stowe in Patriotic Gore , Edmund Wilson remarks on the phenomenon that in the first year after its publication on March 20, 1851, the book sold 305,000 copies in the United States—and another two and a half million worldwide—yet following the war interest in the book waned and he claims that it was out of print for most of the first half of the twentieth century. How do you account for its immense popularity and then its eclipse? It is true that the novel’s popularity declined in the first half of the twen - tieth century, but like the Bible, Uncle Tom’s Cabin has never gone out of print. Its unprecedented success in the nineteenth century derived in part from Stowe’s skillful combination of popular genres with which her audience was familiar: the historical novels of Sir Walter Scott, sentimental fiction, the slave narrative, and the oral traditions of the sermon, political rhetoric, minstrelsy, and the vernacular, including dialect. By packaging her antislavery message in these highly entertaining genres and packing them with dramatic action and sharply drawn characters, Stowe got behind the defenses of her readers and held slavery up before a jury of the civilized world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Plot Against America by Philip Roth About the Book…
    The Plot Against America By Philip Roth About the book…. Set in Newark, New Jersey, in the early 1940s, The Plot Against America tells the story of what it was like for the Roth family and Jews across the country when the isolationist aviation hero Charles Lindbergh was elected president of the United States. Roth's richly imagined novel begins in 1940, with the landslide election of Lindbergh, who blamed the Jews for pushing America toward war with Nazi Germany. Lindbergh's admiration of Hitler and his openly anti-Semitic speeches cause increasing turmoil in the Roth household, and in nine-year-old Philip, as political events at home and abroad overtake their daily lives. Alvin, the orphaned nephew the family has taken in, runs away to Canada to fight the Nazis. Sandy, Philip's older brother, ascribes his parents' fears to paranoia and embraces Lindbergh's Just Folks program, which sends him and other Jewish children to live in the "heartland" for a summer. Philip's mother, Bess, wants the family to flee to Canada before it is too late to escape. But his fiercely idealistic father, Herman, refuses to abandon the country where he was born and raised as an American. Overwhelmed by the tensions around him, Philip tries to run away. "I wanted nothing to do with history," he says. "I wanted to be a boy on the smallest scale possible. I wanted to be an orphan." But history will not let go, and as America is whipped into a deadly frenzy by demagogues, the Roths and Jews everywhere begin to expect the worst.
    [Show full text]