Technological Advisory Committee

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Technological Advisory Committee Technological Advisory Committee Welcome to September 22, 2020 Meeting Agenda 10am – 10:15am Introduction and Opening Remarks 10:15-10:30am Announcements and Roll Call 10:30am ~ 11:15am Artificial Intelligence WG 11:15am-12:00pm Future of Unlicensed Operations WG 12:00pm – 1:00pm Lunch Break 1pm – 1:45pm 5G RAN Technology WG 1:45pm-2:30pm 5G IOT WG 2:30pm-3:00pm Closing Remarks 3pm Adjourned FCC TAC AI and Computing WG Artificial Intelligence Chairs: Lisa Guess, Cradlepoint Adam Drobot, OpenTechWorks, Inc. FCC Liaisons: Michael Ha, Mark Bykowsky, Monisha Ghosh, Martin Doczkat, Robert Pavlak, Chrysanthos Chrysanthou, Gulmira Mustapaeva Date: September 22, 2020 Agenda • Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Computing WG Members • Calendar Year 2020 WG Charter and Objectives • List of Speaker Presentations • Findings • Artificial Intelligence (AI and ML) • Data • Federal Investments in AI • Broadband Mapping • Projects of Interest to the FCC • Draft Areas of Recommendation • Deliverables • Thoughts for Next Year 2020 Work Group Team Members • Shahid Ahmed, Independent • Nageen Himayat, Intel • Sujata Banerjee, VMware • Steve Lanning, Viasat • Nomi Bergman, Advance • Gabriel Lennon, Intern Univ of Colorado • Brian Daly, ATT • Kevin Leddy, Charter • Adam Drobot, OpenTechWorks • Anne Lee, Nokia • Jeffrey Foerster, Intel • Brian Markwalter, CTA • James Goel, Qualcomm • Lynn Merrill, NTCA • Lisa Guess, Cradlepoint • Michael Nawrocki, ATIS • Russ Gyurek, Cisco • Dennis Roberson, entigenlogic • Dale Hatfield, Univ of Colorado • Marvin Sirbu, SGE • Stephen Hayes, Ericsson • David Tennenhouse, VMware • Mark Hess, Comcast • Jack Nasielski, Qualcomm 5 Artificial Intelligence WG - 2020 Charter The Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Computing working group will continue its work on analyzing the ability of AI to improve the performance of telecommunications networks and the services enabled by these networks. To that end, the working group will focus on the following questions as outlined in the subsequent slides: Objective 1 • How can the results from recent programs in AI for spectrum and networking, such as the DARPA Spectrum Collaboration Challenge (SC2) and the NSF/Intel joint solicitation on Machine Learning for Wireless Networking Systems (MLWiNS), be leveraged for real-world systems and applications and for investigating new applications? • Examples: • Understand spectrum usage techniques to automatically identify signals, detect and understand violations • Assist with enforcement to prevent interference • Improve physical layer protocols and signal processing • Actions: • Schedule top 3 winners from challenge as SME speakers – (lessons learned and formulation of use cases) • Use and exploit results from federally funded research programs https://www.spectrumcollaborationchallenge.com/ - DARPA Spectrum Challenge https://www.nsf.gov/events/event_summ.jsp?cntn_id=299111&org=CISE - MLWiNS Objective 2 • AI relies on curated and labeled data sets being available for algorithm development and testing: what should the parameters of such data sets be? • Issues and questions to be answered: o What data sets are already available? • Use cases helpful to the FCC such as Broadband America • Datasets for congestion, provisioning, advertising, marketing are other examples • Center for Applied Internet Data Analysis (CAIDA) at UCSD curated data sets on Internet traffic and network routing which could be helpful for AI (And experience with collecting, disseminating, and curating Data) o How can new data sets be collected and made available to the community? • What is the purpose of the data? • Where can the data be used and by whom? • How can carriers be incented to share data and information for mutual improvement? • How can location data be shared without violating privacy ( it’s tricky!). • Helpful application example is CV tracking. (Israel is using cellphone surveillance to warn citizens who may be affected by individuals already infected – WP article) Objective 3 • How can AI be used to extract meaningful information from data that are either already available (e.g. from the Measuring Broadband America (MBA) program) or may become available, to determine the following: • Coverage at a more granular level • Service parameters available in smaller coverage areas than census blocks • Merged or Aggregated with other data to detect fraudulent activities such as unauthorized spectrum usage Objective 4 • As legitimate applications of AI start proliferating, what risks should be evaluated and what AI tools exist or should be developed to identify and mitigate harms that might arise from the proliferation of AI? • How to promote safe use of AI? • How to deter deleterious use of AI? • How to build in robustness into the AI Methods and Techniques used? Summary of Speaker Presentations List of Speaker Presentations Speaker Affiliation Presentation Title Ulrika Jägare Ericsson “How AI is Shaping Telecom Operations” Mazin E. Gilbert AT&T Research “AI for Autonomous Networks” Jack Murray Mukarram Bin Tariq Google “Optimization of Computing and Communication Resources Nandita Dukkipati Using AI” Rakesh Misra Vmware “Subscriber-Centric ML/AI in Mobile Radio Access Networks” (Uhana) Jason Martin Intel (and “Machine Learning Security & Privacy” Georgia Tech) Berge Ayvazian Wireless 20|20 “Breakthroughs from Synergy Between AI and 5G” List of Speaker Presentations - Continued Speaker Affiliation Presentation Title Tan F. Wong University of “Dynamic Spectrum Sharing: Lessons from the DARPA John M. Shea Florida Spectrum Collaboration Challenge” Peter Volgyesi, Miklos Vanderbilt “Spectrum Collaboration - Building Prize-Winning Radios” Maroti, Peter Horvath, University Sandor Szilvasi Harry Surden U of Colorado “Artificial Intelligence, Government and Ethics” Law School Martin Zoltick Rothwell Figg “Legal and Regulatory Considerations: Application of Artificial Jennifer Maisel Intelligence to Telecommunications and the FCC” Ramana Jampala Avlino “Predictive Modeling & Machine learning-based optimization of network operations” Jeff Alstott IARPA “Security of AI Systems” Alexander Sprintson NSF “Impacts of AI in the Wireless Networking domain” List of Speaker Presentations - Continued Speaker Affiliation Presentation Title Elham Tabassi NIST - ITL “Artificial Intelligence: A NIST strategic priority” Rafail Ostrovsky UCLA “Stewardship of Private Data with Cryptography” Stealth Software Russell Stuart UC Berkeley “Artificial Intelligence: History and Future” Stephen Dennis DHS S&T “ Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning” Sridhar Kowdley Ajay Vikram Singh Nokia “ Artificial Intelligence as a Service - AIaaS” Petros Mouchtaris Prospecta Labs “ AI/ML Research with Applications in Telecommunications” Thyagarajan NSF “The NSF PAWR Initiative” Nandagopal Upcoming Speaker Presentations Speaker Affiliation Subject Michael Cotton NTIA - ITS EM Propagation Data, AI, and 801.22.3 Kumar Navulur DigitalGlobe - Maxar GIS Systems for Telecomms and AI Danny Weitzner MIT - CSAIL The Internet and AI Russell Stuart UC Berkley Return Visit – AI and Control Danny Weitzner Kumar Navulur Michael Cotton Findings Findings: AI and ML Findings – Artificial Intelligence (Machine Learning and Other Methods ) • Artificial Intelligence as a term describes computational techniques consisting of multiple major branches each focused on different methods, approaches, or areas of application. • Since the term “Artificial Intelligence” was coined in the mid 1950s there have been successive waves of deployment of applications that are now routine (such as Optical Character Recognition) or have been widely adopted (among others in areas such as machine vision, speech recognition, natural language processing, knowledge systems, classification systems, and applications including: noise cancellation; search; customer relationship management, chatbots for customer facing services; facial recognition; gaming, control systems; and analysis of high dimensional data) • Within the family of AI techniques Machine Learning (ML) and its sub-branches have recently seen a dramatic surge of investment, activity, and popularity across multiple domains including those that may be of interest to the FCC, with significant impact now, in the near- term, and potentially profound impact in the long term. Findings – Artificial Intelligence (Machine Learning and Other Methods ) • The various flavors of ML hold significant promise for dealing with the complex problems that are important to network planning and design, control and operation of networks, the management of resources such as spectrum, for the technologies used as the building blocks of network architectures, components, devices, and applications, and lastly for customer services and automation of customer interactions through chatbots. • With the continued growth of demand for digital traffic, Networks now connect over 4 Billion people on the planet and 10’s of Billions of devices. ML as a tool set is important because the increasing level of complexity is outpacing the ability of well-established methods in reliably delivering solutions and ML offers a potential approach for conquering that complexity. It is particularly important for machine-to-machine communications characteristic of Industrial uses, the Internet of Things, and the increased heterogeneity of digital traffic on the Network. • The sheer scale and new exacting requirements for network performance are compounding the problem. There is a widely recognized need for a higher level of automation of Network
Recommended publications
  • FCC TAC AI-WG Artificial Intelligence
    Federal Communications Commission Technological Advisory Council Meeting December 1, 2020 FCC Technological Advisory Council Agenda – December 1, 2020 10am – 10:15am Introduction and Opening Remarks 10:15am – 10:30am Announcements and Roll Call FCC Chairman’s Remarks 10:30am – 11am WG Recommendations (5 minutes for each WG) 11am – 11:45am Artificial Intelligence WG 11:45am – 12:30pm Future of Unlicensed Operations WG 12:30pm – 1:00pm Lunch Break 1pm – 1:45pm 5G RAN Technology WG 1:45pm – 2:30pm 5G IoT WG 2:30pm – 3:00pm Closing Remarks 3pm Adjourned 2 FCC TAC Artificial Intelligence and Computing Working Group [AIWG] – Chairman’s Briefing Chairs: Lisa Guess, Cradlepoint Adam Drobot, OpenTechWorks, Inc. FCC Liaisons:Michael Ha, Mark Bykowsky, Monisha Ghosh, Martin Doczkat, Robert Pavlak, Chrysanthos Chrysanthou, Gulmira Mustapaeva Date: December 1, 2020 2020 FCC TAC AIWG Team Members • Shahid Ahmed, Independent • Nageen Himayat, Intel • Sujata Banerjee, VMware • Steve Lanning, Viasat • Nomi Bergman, Advance • Gabriel Lennon, Intern Univ of Colorado • William Check, NCTA • Kevin Leddy, Charter • Brian Daly, ATT • Anne Lee, Nokia • Adam Drobot, OpenTechWorks • Brian Markwalter, CTA • Jeffrey Foerster, Intel • Lynn Merrill, NTCA • James Goel, Qualcomm • Jack Nasielski, Qualcomm • Lisa Guess, Cradlepoint • Michael Nawrocki, ATIS • Russ Gyurek, Cisco • Dennis Roberson, entigenlogic • Dale Hatfield, Univ of Colorado • Marvin Sirbu, SGE • Stephen Hayes, Ericsson • David Tennenhouse, VMware • Mark Hess, Comcast 4 FCC TAC AIWG Activities in FY2020 Issues Addressed Strategic Priorities Industry Trends 1. Leveraging Federal Investments in AI 1. Closing the Digital Divide 2. Promoting Innovation 2. Understanding Data needs for AI 3. Protecting Consumers and 3. Extracting value from AI and Data to Public Safety address issues of importance to the FCC 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Technological Advisory Committee
    Technological Advisory Committee Welcome to June 4, 2020 Meeting Agenda 10:00am - 10:15am Introduction and Opening Remarks 10:15am - 10:30am Announcements and Roll Call 10:30am - 11:15am 5G IOT WG 11:15am - 12:00pm 5G RAN Technology WG 12:00pm - 1:00pm Lunch Break 1:00pm - 1:45pm Future of Unlicensed Operations WG 1:45pm - 2:30pm Artificial Intelligence WG 2:30pm - 3:00pm Closing Remarks 3pm Adjourned 5G/IoT/O-RAN Working Group 2020 WG Chairs: Russ Gyurek, Cisco & Brian Daly, AT&T Date: June 4, 2020 3 Outline for FCC Formal Readout: June 4, 2020 • WG participants • Charter • Summary of SMEs and topics YTD • Standards update • Spectrum view • O-RAN Update • IoT update • Proposed next focus areas • Potential areas for recommendations 2020 Working Group Team Members • Ahmad Armand, T-Mobile • Mike Nawrocki, ATIS • Mark Bayliss, Visualink • Charlie Zhang, Samsung • Marty Cooper, Dyna • Dennis Roberson, entigenlogic • Adam Drobot, OpenTechWorks • Scott Robohn, Juniper • Jeffrey Foerster, Intel • Jesse Russell, incNetworks • Dale Hatfield, Univ of Colorado • Travis Russell, Oracle • Haseeb Akhtar, Ericsson • Kevin Sparks, Nokia Bell Labs • Steve Lanning, Viasat • Marvin Sirbu, Spec. Gov. Emp. • Greg Lapin, ARRL • Tom Sawanobori, CTIA • Lynn Merrill, NTCA • David Young, Verizon • Robert Miller, inc Networks • David Tennenhouse, VMware • Jack Nasielski, Qualcomm FCC Liaisons: Michael Ha, Padma Krishnaswamy, Charles Mathias, Ken Baker, Sean Spivey, Nicholas Oros, Monisha Ghosh 2020 Charter from FCC 5G in low/mid/high frequency bands - critically
    [Show full text]
  • Dongning Guo Curriculum Vitae
    Dongning Guo Curriculum Vitae Contact Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering Northwestern University 2145 Sheridan Rd., Evanston, IL 60208 Tel: +1-847-491-3056 Fax: +1-847-491-4455 Email: [email protected] http://users.ece.northwestern.edu/∼dguo Employment 9/2015–present Professor Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA. 9/2010–8/2015 Associate Professor Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA. 9/2004–8/2010 Assistant Professor Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA. 7/2014–6/2015 Visiting Scientist (courtesy appointment) Research Laboratory of Electronics Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. 3/2011–8/2011 Consultant New Jersey Research & Development Center, Qualcomm Inc., Bridgewater, NJ, USA. 10/2010–2/2011 Visiting Professor Institute of Network Coding Chinese University of Hong Kong, China. 8/2006–9/2006 Visiting Professor Department of Electronics & Telecommunications Norwegian University of Science & Technology, Trondheim, Norway. 2/1998–8/1999 Research & Development Engineer Centre for Wireless Communications, Singapore. Education Ph.D., Electrical Engineering, 2004 Princeton University, Princeton, NJ. 1 Thesis: Gaussian Channels: Information, Estimation and Multiuser Detection Adviser: Sergio Verdu´ Committee: Sergio Verdu,´ Shlomo Shamai, H. Vincent Poor, Robert Calder- bank, Mung Chiang. M.A., Electrical Engineering, 2001 Princeton University, Princeton, NJ. M.Eng., Electrical Engineering, 1999 National University of Singapore, Singapore. Thesis: Linear Parallel Interference Cancellation in CDMA Adviser: Lars K. Rasmussen B.Eng., Electrical Engineering & Information Science, 1995 University of Science & Technology of China, Hefei, China. Teaching Experience EECS 222 Fundamentals of Signals and Systems (undergraduate) Instructor: Fall 2005, 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperative Tournament
    DARPA SPECTRUM CHALLENGE Team MarmotE: Peter Volgyesi, Miklos Maroti, Peter Horvath, Sandor Szilvasi, Benjamin Babjak http://dtsn.darpa.mil/spectrumchallenge CHALLENGE GOALS PRELIMINARY CHALLENGE OUTCOME ISIS TECHNOLOGY The DARPA Spectrum Challenge is a competition to Proprietary physical layer design featuring demonstrate a radio protocol that can best use a given • Highly power efficient, interference-resilient wideband communication channel in the presence of other single-carrier transmission dynamic users and interfering signals. • Extremely robust, innovative synchronization schemes The Challenge is not focused on developing new radio relying on novel algebraic constructions hardware, but instead is targeted at finding strategies for • Open-loop variable-rate retransmission algorithm for guaranteeing successful communication in the presence received power accumulation of other radios that may have conflicting co-existence • Optimized transmit spectrum objectives. • Innovations enable reliable operation under very low signal-to-noise ratio conditions while effectively Challenge timeline: hindering the communication of the competing team in • During the Qualification Hurdles (March 2013) the ISIS team, cooperative setting Team MarmotE qualified rank 5 out of the 90 teams that initially registered. • The contestants in the Preliminary Event (September 2013) included the 15 highest-scoring teams and three wildcard teams. • The Final Challenge competition (March 2014) is slated to follow the same structure as the preliminaries but award
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation of Federal Prize Authority: Fiscal Year 2013 Progress Report
    Implementation of Federal Prize Authority: Fiscal Year 2013 Progress Report A Report from the Office of Science and Technology Policy In Response to the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010 and the Requirements of Section 24 of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 May 2014 1 ABOUT THE OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) advises the President on the effects of science and technology on domestic and international affairs. The office serves as a source of scientific and technological analysis and judgment for the President with respect to major policies, plans, and programs of the Federal government. OSTP leads an interagency effort to develop and implement sound science and technology policies and budgets. The office works with the private sector to ensure that Federal investments in science and technology contribute to economic prosperity, environmental quality, and national security. For more information, visit http://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp. COPYRIGHT INFORMATION This document is a work of the U.S. Government and is in the public domain (see 17 U.S.C. 105). DEPARTMENT, AGENCY, OFFICE, AND DIVISION ABBREVIATIONS AFRL Air Force Research Laboratory (part of Air Force/DOD) ARL Army Research Laboratory (part of Army/DOD) ASPR Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (part of HHS) CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (part of HHS) CMS Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (part of HHS) DARPA Defense Advanced Research Projects
    [Show full text]