Cooperative Tournament

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cooperative Tournament DARPA SPECTRUM CHALLENGE Team MarmotE: Peter Volgyesi, Miklos Maroti, Peter Horvath, Sandor Szilvasi, Benjamin Babjak http://dtsn.darpa.mil/spectrumchallenge CHALLENGE GOALS PRELIMINARY CHALLENGE OUTCOME ISIS TECHNOLOGY The DARPA Spectrum Challenge is a competition to Proprietary physical layer design featuring demonstrate a radio protocol that can best use a given • Highly power efficient, interference-resilient wideband communication channel in the presence of other single-carrier transmission dynamic users and interfering signals. • Extremely robust, innovative synchronization schemes The Challenge is not focused on developing new radio relying on novel algebraic constructions hardware, but instead is targeted at finding strategies for • Open-loop variable-rate retransmission algorithm for guaranteeing successful communication in the presence received power accumulation of other radios that may have conflicting co-existence • Optimized transmit spectrum objectives. • Innovations enable reliable operation under very low signal-to-noise ratio conditions while effectively Challenge timeline: hindering the communication of the competing team in • During the Qualification Hurdles (March 2013) the ISIS team, cooperative setting Team MarmotE qualified rank 5 out of the 90 teams that initially registered. • The contestants in the Preliminary Event (September 2013) included the 15 highest-scoring teams and three wildcard teams. • The Final Challenge competition (March 2014) is slated to follow the same structure as the preliminaries but award twice the prize money. Photo: DARPA Purdue Purdue University, Raytheon Efficient Spectrum Individual The ISIS team won the competitive challenge undefeated and came in third in the cooperative tournament. WSL-NEU Northeastern University The winners pose with Dr. Arati Prabhakar, DARPA Director and Dr. Yifty Eisenberg, Program Manager MarmotE Vanderbilt University, ISIS Gator Wings University of Florida Spartans San Jose State University COMPETITION FRAMEWORK Software-defined implementation in GNU Radio RxTx Individuals • FOSS software development toolkit that provides signal VT-Hume Virginia Tech All the matches occurred on the ORBIT testbed at Rutgers University’s WINLAB, wasabi Individual processing blocks to implement software defined VT CogRad Virginia Tech which streamed the proceedings live to DARPA where contestants and The Orange Wireless Syracuse University government personnel watched the event unfold. Contestants submitted their radios Wireless Infidels Polytechnic Institute of NYU GTRI Georgia Tech Research Institute competitive and cooperative designs as Linux image files in advance. MarmotE modules: Wildcats Northwestern University • High-performance real-time signal processing blocks Notre Spectrum Notre Dame University KPE Individual • SIMD optimizations for resource-critical tasks Tennessee Tech Telecom Tennessee Tech Buzz Radio Georgia Institute of Technology • Contributions to GNU Radio code base RULES OUTLOOK: FINAL CHALLENGE Competitive tournament: In each match, two teams battle to Photo: DARPA Incorporating lessons learned from the preliminary event: dominate the spectrum, with the winner being the first to • Strive to increase spectrum efficiency transmit files of random data (or to successfully transmit the Competitive tournament: the final double WINLAB photo • Explore intentional jamming opportunities greatest proportion of the files) from a source radio to a elimination bracket • Prepare the design for more interactive challenges destination radio. Teams have to evade, jam and/or operate in • Create a dedicated cooperative radio design the presence of competitors’ signals within a defined 5 MHz • Add more effective and robust coding schemes portion of the radio spectrum. This tournament simulates conditions directly applicable to military communications, where To help competitors see how their software compared with other teams’ designs, WINLAB developed data visualization technology for radios must deliver high-priority data in congested and often DARPA that showed the specific radio frequencies each team used and their progress in transmitting the test file. Based on color-coded contested electromagnetic environments. spectrum occupancy patterns, watchers could see how the radios interacted and infer each team’s likely strategies in real time. Cooperative tournament: In each match, three teams work together to share the spectrum and transmit their random data files in the shortest time. Teams can not coordinate in advance on Team MarmotE how to share the spectrum, so they have to develop and implement algorithms that enable their software-defined radios Art to communicate at a high rate while leaving spectrum for the other two teams to do the same. This tournament simulates conditions that might be encountered during coalition Levendovszky operations, and also has possible future commercial applications, : such as opportunistic, license-free exploitation of ”TV White Photo Spaces” for high data rate communications. Photo: DARPA Photo: DARPA DARPA provided all teams with the same hardware (USRP N210 radios) to ensure that each team would win based on their software algorithms alone. The competitive finals as seen on the spectrum display Cooperative match featuring MarmotE .
Recommended publications
  • FCC TAC AI-WG Artificial Intelligence
    Federal Communications Commission Technological Advisory Council Meeting December 1, 2020 FCC Technological Advisory Council Agenda – December 1, 2020 10am – 10:15am Introduction and Opening Remarks 10:15am – 10:30am Announcements and Roll Call FCC Chairman’s Remarks 10:30am – 11am WG Recommendations (5 minutes for each WG) 11am – 11:45am Artificial Intelligence WG 11:45am – 12:30pm Future of Unlicensed Operations WG 12:30pm – 1:00pm Lunch Break 1pm – 1:45pm 5G RAN Technology WG 1:45pm – 2:30pm 5G IoT WG 2:30pm – 3:00pm Closing Remarks 3pm Adjourned 2 FCC TAC Artificial Intelligence and Computing Working Group [AIWG] – Chairman’s Briefing Chairs: Lisa Guess, Cradlepoint Adam Drobot, OpenTechWorks, Inc. FCC Liaisons:Michael Ha, Mark Bykowsky, Monisha Ghosh, Martin Doczkat, Robert Pavlak, Chrysanthos Chrysanthou, Gulmira Mustapaeva Date: December 1, 2020 2020 FCC TAC AIWG Team Members • Shahid Ahmed, Independent • Nageen Himayat, Intel • Sujata Banerjee, VMware • Steve Lanning, Viasat • Nomi Bergman, Advance • Gabriel Lennon, Intern Univ of Colorado • William Check, NCTA • Kevin Leddy, Charter • Brian Daly, ATT • Anne Lee, Nokia • Adam Drobot, OpenTechWorks • Brian Markwalter, CTA • Jeffrey Foerster, Intel • Lynn Merrill, NTCA • James Goel, Qualcomm • Jack Nasielski, Qualcomm • Lisa Guess, Cradlepoint • Michael Nawrocki, ATIS • Russ Gyurek, Cisco • Dennis Roberson, entigenlogic • Dale Hatfield, Univ of Colorado • Marvin Sirbu, SGE • Stephen Hayes, Ericsson • David Tennenhouse, VMware • Mark Hess, Comcast 4 FCC TAC AIWG Activities in FY2020 Issues Addressed Strategic Priorities Industry Trends 1. Leveraging Federal Investments in AI 1. Closing the Digital Divide 2. Promoting Innovation 2. Understanding Data needs for AI 3. Protecting Consumers and 3. Extracting value from AI and Data to Public Safety address issues of importance to the FCC 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Technological Advisory Committee
    Technological Advisory Committee Welcome to June 4, 2020 Meeting Agenda 10:00am - 10:15am Introduction and Opening Remarks 10:15am - 10:30am Announcements and Roll Call 10:30am - 11:15am 5G IOT WG 11:15am - 12:00pm 5G RAN Technology WG 12:00pm - 1:00pm Lunch Break 1:00pm - 1:45pm Future of Unlicensed Operations WG 1:45pm - 2:30pm Artificial Intelligence WG 2:30pm - 3:00pm Closing Remarks 3pm Adjourned 5G/IoT/O-RAN Working Group 2020 WG Chairs: Russ Gyurek, Cisco & Brian Daly, AT&T Date: June 4, 2020 3 Outline for FCC Formal Readout: June 4, 2020 • WG participants • Charter • Summary of SMEs and topics YTD • Standards update • Spectrum view • O-RAN Update • IoT update • Proposed next focus areas • Potential areas for recommendations 2020 Working Group Team Members • Ahmad Armand, T-Mobile • Mike Nawrocki, ATIS • Mark Bayliss, Visualink • Charlie Zhang, Samsung • Marty Cooper, Dyna • Dennis Roberson, entigenlogic • Adam Drobot, OpenTechWorks • Scott Robohn, Juniper • Jeffrey Foerster, Intel • Jesse Russell, incNetworks • Dale Hatfield, Univ of Colorado • Travis Russell, Oracle • Haseeb Akhtar, Ericsson • Kevin Sparks, Nokia Bell Labs • Steve Lanning, Viasat • Marvin Sirbu, Spec. Gov. Emp. • Greg Lapin, ARRL • Tom Sawanobori, CTIA • Lynn Merrill, NTCA • David Young, Verizon • Robert Miller, inc Networks • David Tennenhouse, VMware • Jack Nasielski, Qualcomm FCC Liaisons: Michael Ha, Padma Krishnaswamy, Charles Mathias, Ken Baker, Sean Spivey, Nicholas Oros, Monisha Ghosh 2020 Charter from FCC 5G in low/mid/high frequency bands - critically
    [Show full text]
  • Dongning Guo Curriculum Vitae
    Dongning Guo Curriculum Vitae Contact Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering Northwestern University 2145 Sheridan Rd., Evanston, IL 60208 Tel: +1-847-491-3056 Fax: +1-847-491-4455 Email: [email protected] http://users.ece.northwestern.edu/∼dguo Employment 9/2015–present Professor Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA. 9/2010–8/2015 Associate Professor Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA. 9/2004–8/2010 Assistant Professor Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA. 7/2014–6/2015 Visiting Scientist (courtesy appointment) Research Laboratory of Electronics Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. 3/2011–8/2011 Consultant New Jersey Research & Development Center, Qualcomm Inc., Bridgewater, NJ, USA. 10/2010–2/2011 Visiting Professor Institute of Network Coding Chinese University of Hong Kong, China. 8/2006–9/2006 Visiting Professor Department of Electronics & Telecommunications Norwegian University of Science & Technology, Trondheim, Norway. 2/1998–8/1999 Research & Development Engineer Centre for Wireless Communications, Singapore. Education Ph.D., Electrical Engineering, 2004 Princeton University, Princeton, NJ. 1 Thesis: Gaussian Channels: Information, Estimation and Multiuser Detection Adviser: Sergio Verdu´ Committee: Sergio Verdu,´ Shlomo Shamai, H. Vincent Poor, Robert Calder- bank, Mung Chiang. M.A., Electrical Engineering, 2001 Princeton University, Princeton, NJ. M.Eng., Electrical Engineering, 1999 National University of Singapore, Singapore. Thesis: Linear Parallel Interference Cancellation in CDMA Adviser: Lars K. Rasmussen B.Eng., Electrical Engineering & Information Science, 1995 University of Science & Technology of China, Hefei, China. Teaching Experience EECS 222 Fundamentals of Signals and Systems (undergraduate) Instructor: Fall 2005, 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Technological Advisory Committee
    Technological Advisory Committee Welcome to September 22, 2020 Meeting Agenda 10am – 10:15am Introduction and Opening Remarks 10:15-10:30am Announcements and Roll Call 10:30am ~ 11:15am Artificial Intelligence WG 11:15am-12:00pm Future of Unlicensed Operations WG 12:00pm – 1:00pm Lunch Break 1pm – 1:45pm 5G RAN Technology WG 1:45pm-2:30pm 5G IOT WG 2:30pm-3:00pm Closing Remarks 3pm Adjourned FCC TAC AI and Computing WG Artificial Intelligence Chairs: Lisa Guess, Cradlepoint Adam Drobot, OpenTechWorks, Inc. FCC Liaisons: Michael Ha, Mark Bykowsky, Monisha Ghosh, Martin Doczkat, Robert Pavlak, Chrysanthos Chrysanthou, Gulmira Mustapaeva Date: September 22, 2020 Agenda • Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Computing WG Members • Calendar Year 2020 WG Charter and Objectives • List of Speaker Presentations • Findings • Artificial Intelligence (AI and ML) • Data • Federal Investments in AI • Broadband Mapping • Projects of Interest to the FCC • Draft Areas of Recommendation • Deliverables • Thoughts for Next Year 2020 Work Group Team Members • Shahid Ahmed, Independent • Nageen Himayat, Intel • Sujata Banerjee, VMware • Steve Lanning, Viasat • Nomi Bergman, Advance • Gabriel Lennon, Intern Univ of Colorado • Brian Daly, ATT • Kevin Leddy, Charter • Adam Drobot, OpenTechWorks • Anne Lee, Nokia • Jeffrey Foerster, Intel • Brian Markwalter, CTA • James Goel, Qualcomm • Lynn Merrill, NTCA • Lisa Guess, Cradlepoint • Michael Nawrocki, ATIS • Russ Gyurek, Cisco • Dennis Roberson, entigenlogic • Dale Hatfield, Univ of Colorado • Marvin Sirbu, SGE • Stephen Hayes, Ericsson • David Tennenhouse, VMware • Mark Hess, Comcast • Jack Nasielski, Qualcomm 5 Artificial Intelligence WG - 2020 Charter The Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Computing working group will continue its work on analyzing the ability of AI to improve the performance of telecommunications networks and the services enabled by these networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation of Federal Prize Authority: Fiscal Year 2013 Progress Report
    Implementation of Federal Prize Authority: Fiscal Year 2013 Progress Report A Report from the Office of Science and Technology Policy In Response to the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010 and the Requirements of Section 24 of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 May 2014 1 ABOUT THE OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) advises the President on the effects of science and technology on domestic and international affairs. The office serves as a source of scientific and technological analysis and judgment for the President with respect to major policies, plans, and programs of the Federal government. OSTP leads an interagency effort to develop and implement sound science and technology policies and budgets. The office works with the private sector to ensure that Federal investments in science and technology contribute to economic prosperity, environmental quality, and national security. For more information, visit http://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp. COPYRIGHT INFORMATION This document is a work of the U.S. Government and is in the public domain (see 17 U.S.C. 105). DEPARTMENT, AGENCY, OFFICE, AND DIVISION ABBREVIATIONS AFRL Air Force Research Laboratory (part of Air Force/DOD) ARL Army Research Laboratory (part of Army/DOD) ASPR Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (part of HHS) CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (part of HHS) CMS Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (part of HHS) DARPA Defense Advanced Research Projects
    [Show full text]