DOCSLIB.ORG

4 November 1980] 212911

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

[Tuesday, 4 November 1980] 212911 (b) a member who speaks after II p.m. on the question "That the House do now Tuesday, 4 November 1980 adjourn" and refers to matters that could be considered as new business, does in fact contravene Standing Order The PRESIDENT (the Hon. Clive Griffiths) No. 117 by not confining his remarks to took the Chair at 4.30 p.m., and read prayers. whether or not the House should adjourn? MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT I respectfully state at the outset that it is not my Dress: Statement by President intention, Mr President, to question your THE PRESIDENT (the Hon. Clive Griffiths): undisputed right to give a decision in this House I wish to announce that in response to requests in regard to Standing Orders; rather it is my received for my consideration concerning the intention to seek a decision on the meaning of relaxation of the convention relating to the several Standing Orders and, in addition, while traditional mode of dress in the House, it is my they are being considered I seek a decision as to intention to Permit members, should they so whether it may be in the interests of the House to desire, to remove their coats during sittings should amend the Standing Orders concerned to make the atmospheric conditions in my opinion warrant their intentions quite clear. 1 know when you were such modification of the convention. elected President of the House you inherited the When it is considered that the conditions practice of members spaking on the motion warrant the change, it is my intention to indicate "That the House do now adjourn"; but since this my approval by placing an advice to this effect on practice was first introduced I believe it has gone the notice boards of the House. far beyond a matter of reasonable debate. It is also in order for members to wear safari One could not object to debate on the question suits in the House should they so desire, providing "That the House do now adjourn" if it were that when shirts are worn with this form of dress, confined strictly to the question. However, on ties are worn also. recent occasions not one of the members who have taken advantage of the opportunity to speak on this motion has even referred to the question LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL before the Chair. I would refer to page 1927 of PHOTOGRAPHS Hansard No. s where the Hon. A. A. Lewis spoke Australian Broadcasting Commission: Statement on the adjournment motion and did not mention by President anything about the question before the House. He THE PRESIDENT (the H-on. Clive Griffiths): started by saying "I do not wish to delay the The Australian Broadcasting Commission sought House for any length of time.-. .", but at no time my approval to take some still photographs of this did he mention the question before the Chair. Chamber some time during the afternoon for the The same thing happened in respect of a purpose of using them as backdrops to its news number of speeches made on the adjournment sessions associated with this House of Parliament. motion on 8 October. On that occasion a number I granted approval for that. of members spoke for quite some time, not one of whom The Hon. D. K. Dans: Photographing is still mentioned the question before the House. very appropriate. Again, on 22 October, at page 2465 onwards of Hansard No. I11we find that some six members The PRESIDENT: Order! spoke, and not one of them mentioned the motion before the House. STANDING ORDERS COMMITTEE I wonder why the members of the early Consideration of Adjournment Debate: Motion Legislative Council in the nineteenth century THE HON. N. E. BAXTER (Central) j4.54 framed the question which has been in use ever p.m.]: I move- since, and a question that is used not only in the House of Representatives and the Senate in the That the Standing Orders Committee at Commonwealth Parliament, but also in another its next meeting consider whether- place in this State. What significance did the (a) Standing Order No. 88 confines a members of the early Legislative Council place on member to strictly debate the question the word "now" when they included it in the "That the House do now adjourn" only, motion? Surely there must have been some or is'a member permitted to speak on specific reason for its inclusion. They must have whatever subject he may choose; and meant at that time that the adjournment of the 2912 2912COUNCIL] House should take place as soon as possible after The Hon. N. E. BAXTER: If the honourable the movement of the motion. member would listen, perhaps he would learn If one looks at any dictionary-it does not from somebody who has been here for many years matter which one-one Finds the word "now" and who, for I I years, was Chairman of means "at the present time". Therefore, when the Committees in this Chamber. One would think he Leader of the House or any Other Minister was the only one who knew anything about tbe deputising for him rises and moves the motion Standing Orders. He is one of the clever, smart- "That the House do now adjourn" it means the alecky lawyers who come in here thinking they House should adjourn at that time, not one hour know something about everything. Let him listen and 46 minutes later, and not 56 minutes later. In for a while, and learn something for a change. fact at present there is a possibility that the The Hon. Peter Dowding interjected. House could still be sitting at 4.30 the following The Hon. N. E. BAXTER: I am almost old afternoon, if the members of a party attempted to enough to be his grandfather, and I am still filibuster. learning. The Leader of the House could rise to his feet The PRESIDENT: Order! at, say, 10.00 p.m., to move the motion, and if The Hon. N. E. BAXTER: members of the Opposition each spoke for about I was referring to three hours the House still would be sitting in the Standing Order No. 88, which reads as follows- following afternoon. 88. No Member shall digress from the The Hon. Peter Dowding: Is there any evidence subject matter of any Question under that has happened, or are you just making it up? discussion; nor anticipate the discussion of any subject which appears on the Notice The H-on. G. E. Masters: I can't hear you! Paper. The Hon. N. E, BAXTER: What a stupid How many members have addressed themselves statement. to the subject matter, "That the House do now The Hon. P. H. Lockyer: From a stupid adjourn"? If members refer to the speeches made member. on this question on Wednesday, 8 October, they The Hon. N. E. BAXTER: We know that a find that the speeches went for one hour 40 member spoke in this Chamber for over four minutes. hours on one occasion. The Hon. R. Hetherington; Terrible! The Hon. Peter Dowding: Has it happened this The Hon. N. E. BAXTER: As I said before, session? not one of those speeches referred to the question The Hon. J. M. Berinson: On the adjournment before the House. There was no attempt to debate motion? the question before the House. The Hon. N. E. BAXTER: I do not care what On 22 October 1980, the speeches on the session it has happened in. adjournment motion lasted 56 minutes. The Hon. D. K. Dans: It certainly was not on The Hon. R. Hetherington: Your motion wipes the adjournment. out the Budget debate, does it not? The PRESIDENT: Order! The Hon. N. E. BAXTER: Seven members indulged themselves on completely unimportant The Hon. N. E. BAXTER: A filibuster could issues. take place. Filibusters have happened in Parliaments all over the world. There is no use in The Hon. D. K. Dans: Who is the judge of members saying anything different. that? The Hon. H. W. Olney: What happens if the The PRESIDENT: Order! motion is lost? You do not go home; you keep on The Hon. J. M. Berinson: That was the night sitting? Mr Pike spoke, I believe. The Hon. N. E. BAXTER: Let me deal now The PRESIDENT: Order! with Standing Order Na. 88. The Hon. N. E. BAXTER: it was absolutely The Hon. Peter Dowding: What are you without profit, as far as I am concerned. What frightened of? was the purpose of all that talking? The Hon. N. E. BAXTER: I am not frightened The Hon. D. K. Dans: What is the purpose of of anything. half the talking within the Standing Orders? The PRESIDENT: Order! The PRESIDENT: Order! [Tuesday, 4 November 1980] 291391 The Hon. R. G. Pike: Fancy bringing politics The Hon. N. E. BAXTER: A real Irish stew of into this place! subjects. The Hon. N. E. BAXTER: What a ridiculous The Hon. Peter Dowding: Isn't that terrible? situation this House has come to- How awful! The Hon. R. Hetherington: Because we bring The Hon. N. E. BAXTER: Of course it is party politics into the Chamber? terrible. The Hon. D. K. Dans: I agree with that last The PRESIDENT: Order! statement. The Hon. Peter Dowding: It is an iniquity that The Hon. N. E. BAXTER: -when not one we discussed such issues. member mentions the question before the Chair. The Hon. N. E. BAXTER: It is an iniquity that Surely Standing Order No. 88 was framed so that members thrust those issues on the House.
Recommended publications
  • (Bill) Withers

    (Bill) Withers

    PARLIAMENTARY HISTORY ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND STATE LIBRARY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA Transcript of an interview with William (Bill) Withers 1931 - ACCESS : OPEN RESEARCH: OPEN STATE LIBRARY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA - ORAL HISTORY COLLECTION DATE OF INTERVIEW: 2007 INTERVIEWER: Ron Chapman TRANSCRIBER: HANSARDS - PARLIAMENT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA DURATION: 3 hours REFERENCE NUMBER: 0H3571 COPYRIGHT: State Library of Western Australia and the Parliament of Western Australia NOTE TO READER Readers of this oral history memoir should bear in mind that it is a verbatim transcript of the spoken word and reflects the informal, conversational style that is inherent in such historical sources. The Parliament and the State Library are not responsible for the factual accuracy of the memoir, nor for the views expressed therein; these are for the reader to judge. Bold type face indicates a difference between transcript and recording, as a result of corrections made to the transcript only, usually at the request of the person interviewed. FULL CAPITALS in the text indicate a word or words emphasised by the person interviewed. Square brackets [] are used for insertions not in the original tape. INTERVIEW WITHERS Page Contents List Reference Education -Kogarah Primary School & Sydney Technical High School 1 Early family life - joining the Air Training Corp (ATC) at age 13 - joined 2-6 RAAF in 1948 - art work to supplement income Art work and painting course Perth College 6 -8 Marriage and family 8 - 11 Rejected joining the ALP - Alan Ridge - joining the Liberal Party as 12 - 16 endorsed candidate for North Province Writing his book Frontier Dreaming; A light-hearted look at the birth of the 16 -17 Kimberley frontier town.
  • 6477 Tuesday, 22 August 1995 THE

    6477 Tuesday, 22 August 1995 THE

    6477 Tuesday, 22 August 1995 THE PRESIDENT (Hon Clive Griffiths) took the Chair at 3.30 pm, and read prayers. MOTION.- CONDOLENCE Diver, Sir Leslie HON GEORGE CASH (North Metropolitan - Leader of the House) [3.34 pm] - without notice: I move - That this House expresses its deep regret at the death of Hon Sir Leslie Charles Diver Kt, a former member and President of the Legislative Council, and places on record its appreciation for his long and meritorious public service, and tenders its profound sympathy to members of his family in their bereavement. Members will have noted with regret the recent death of Sir Leslie Diver on 4 August at the age of 95. Sir Leslie was born in North Perth and educated in both North Perth and the country. He went on to become a farmer of great repute; in fact, he was a farmier for all his working life. Even while he was a member of this Parliament he actively continued in his farming pursuits. Sir Les Diver was a member of this Parliament from 1952 to 1974 and was President of the Legislative Council from 1960 to 1974. Clearly, he was a committed parliamentarian and was greatly respected by all members who served with him in this House. When I want to undertake some research on members of this House, I often seek reference in the Parliamentary Library. In researching the Hansardfor information on Sir Leslie Diver, I noted that his maiden speech was on 31 July 1952, soon after his election in May of 1952, when as the member for Central Province he moved the Address-in-Reply.
  • Winifred Margaret Piesse

    Winifred Margaret Piesse

    MAKING A DIFFERENCE—A FRONTIER OF FIRSTS WOMEN IN THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN PARLIAMENT 1921–2012 David Black and Harry Phillips Parliamentary History Project Parliament of Western Australia 2012 Women in the Western Australian Parliament 1921–2012 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ WINIFRED MARGARET PIESSE MLC Lower Central Province 22 May 1977–21 May 1983 (NCP). Member Select Committee on National Parks 1980–1981. First woman National (Country) Party member elected to the Legislative Council. When Winifred Piesse was elected to the Legislative Council for the Lower Central Province for a six year term commencing in May 1977 she became the first woman ever to represent the Country Party (or National Country Party) in either House of the Western Australian Parliament. She won the seat comfortably on Liberal preferences in 1977 but six years later her preferences helped to elect the Liberal candidate after she had failed by less than 400 votes to avoid elimination after the first count. Winifred was born on 12 June 1923 at Narre Warren in Victoria, 25 miles east of Melbourne, daughter of Frederick Aumann, an orchardist, and his wife, Marguerite, and was educated at the Narre Warren State School before going to Dandenong High School.1 Through ill health she left school at fifteen but subsequently completed her nursing general certificate and certificates in midwifery and child health and worked as a nurse at Warragul and in Melbourne from 1944 until the end of 1946, when she moved to Western Australia. There she worked in hospitals, first in Busselton and then in Narrogin, in order to be nearer her future husband Mervyn Piesse, a farmer in Wagin (and son of Charles Austin Piesse, who had sat in the Western Australian Legislative Council from 1894 to 1914), whom she had met in Busselton.2 The couple were married on 3 September 1947 at the Christ Church in South Yarra and Winifred subsequently had three children, two boys and one girl.
  • 13 September 1983] 161669

    13 September 1983] 161669

    [Tuesday, 13 September 1983] 161669 QUESTIONS ?Gr~tiaathw (lhni Questions were taken at this stage. Tuesday, 13 September 1983 During questions without notice the President made the following statement- The PRESIDENT (Hon. Clive Griffiths) took STANDING ORDER No. 212 the Chair at 4.30 p.m.. and read prayers. Statement by President TEMPORARY REDUCTION OF REM UNER- THE PRESIDENT (Hon. Clive Griffiths): ATION (SENIOR PUBLIC OFFICERS) BILL Honourable members will be aware that one hour has now elapsed since the time set down for the Assent commencement of business of the day. I wish to Message from the Governor received and read make a couple of comments in regard to the state notifying assent to the Bill. of affairs we have now reached. Members will know that until quite recently it ANIMALS: DOG ACT has never been necessary to invoke the provisions Review: Petition of Standing Order No. 212. 1 have been interpreting it in the same way, on the odd oc- On motions by the Hon. Fred McKenzie, the casion that the situation has occurred in recent following petition bearing the signatures of six times and applied to it the same provisions as I persons was received, read, and ordered to lie have for Standing Order No. 181. 1 have been upon the Table of the House- looking at Standing Order No. 212 and it occurs to me that it is worded slightly differently from To the Honourable Members in Parlia- Standing Order No. 18 1. ment Assembled, We, the undersigned, wish In future, commencing now, it is my intention to draw your attention to the fact that the not to initiate the seeking of leave to proceed with recommendations put to the Minister by the whatever we are doing at one hour after the com- Dog Act Review Committee, May 1983, are mencement of the House.