Supplementary Geographic Information for Written Submissions On

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Supplementary Geographic Information for Written Submissions on the 2016 Draft Nunavut Land Use Plan To: The Nunavut Planning Commission (NPC) From: The Qikiqtaaluk Wildlife Board (QWB), and the Hunters and Trappers Organizations (HTOs) of Grise Fiord, Resolute Bay, Arctic Bay, Pond Inlet, Clyde River, Qikiqtarjuaq, Pangnirtung, Iqaluit, Kimmirut, Cape Dorset, Sanikiluaq, Hall Beach and Igloolik Background and Summary The following table contains additional geographic information for 42 of the 43 Written Submissions (WSs) that the QWB and its member HTOs provided to the NPC on the 2016 draft Nunavut Land Use Plan (DNLUP). WS-14 contained proposed amendments to Table 2 of the 2016 DNLUP, which did not have geographic information directly applicable to that submission. After contacting various agencies, government departments and other parties about the types of geographic information that they may be interested in, the QWB received specific requests only from Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. (NTI) and the Qikiqtani Inuit Association (QIA). NTI and QIA both requested information about the intersection of between various classes of Inuit-owned lands (IOL), and the protected and special management areas proposed by QWB and the HTOs in their WSs. Therefore, in the following table the QWB has provided approximate estimates of various types of IOL that may intersect with areas proposed in the QWB’s and HTOs’ 42 WSs. Note that these estimates are approximate because the shorelines in the IOL shapefiles did not fully align with the shorelines of the QWB’s base maps, which we were obtained from 1:250,000 shapefiles downloaded from the Government of Canada’s Geogratis web site (i.e., https://maps.canada.ca/czs/index-en.html). QIA provided QWB with shapefiles for IOL with surface rights, and IOL with surface and subsurface rights, which reportedly were originally given to QIA by the NPC. Based on the distance between 30 random identifiable shoreline vertices in both the IOL surface rights layer and QWB’s base regional layer, the misalignment of the layers averaged 97.9 m (95% confidence interval: 69-127 m, range for the 30 sampled vertices: 0 – 396 m). Footnote 4 indicates where in 12 cases apparent intersection between QWB proposed areas and various IOL was not real and solely due to the misalignment of layers (average area: 1.3 km2, 95% CI: 0.0 - 2.7 km2). In many areas and as expected, there is extensive intersection between designated land areas proposed by the QWB and the HTOs and IOL with surface rights. During the community-based 1 land selection process leading to the Nunavut Final Agreement in the 1980s and early ‘90s, wildlife harvesting areas and important wildlife habitats were two of several major values that Inuit used to select lands that they wanted to own. Extensive intersection between surface IOL and the proposed QWB-HTO land-use designations reflect the continuing importance of these wildlife values for Inuit. On the other hand, the NFA land selection process did not permit inclusion of all the major land areas and none of the important marine areas that are needed for continued Inuit food and cultural security in the future. For five (5) IOL subsurface parcels where there are existing exploration and similar agreements, proposed QWB and HTO designations would restrict mineral exploration and production. The approximate total intersecting area for 4 of these parcels is 48 km2. For the other one, the intersecting area is 627 km2. The applicable parcel numbers are provided in the table below. The QWB and HTOs would like the opportunity to negotiate with NTI and QIA about how these cases could be addressed going forward. Since no other party requested additional specific information about the QWB and HTO submissions to the NPC, we assume that the following table provides sufficient information to all parties that may be interested in these submissions at this time. Due to the large number of GIS analyses and transcriptions of data, inadvertent errors may have occurred. The results have been double checked, so any errors should have minimal impact of the information. If any concerns arise, please contact [email protected] Written Description of Supplementary Information Geographic Amount Submission No. Information Type and Title On-ice routes. Note: Nearby routes were Number 373 WS-01: On-Ice usually merged into a single route. Transportation Total Length 24,012 km Routes Land access routes. Note: These are some Number 91 but not all over-land routes that connect to on-ice routes. Total length 2,452 km Grouped terrestrial and ice walrus haul- Number of separately Terrestrial: 90 outs. Note: The estimated number of haul- designated haul-out Ice: 1 outs is very conservative. Haul-out islands, areas WS-02: Site # 41, points and shorelines within 5 km of each Walrus Haul-outs other were grouped as a single area of Total area of 2 (Ulliit) 1,479 km haul-outs. A single group could extend terrestrial haul-outs more than 5 km if there were several interjacent islands or points within 5 km of Maximum perimeter 224 km each other. of ice haul-out 2 Written Description of Supplementary Information Geographic Amount Submission No. Information Type and Title Approximate area of 2 Walrus may or may not haul-out onto IOL in terrestrial haul- 771 km multiple islands or points within each outs (Surface)i identified group at the same time. As well, some walrus haul-outs also occur within Approximate area of 2 Multiple Value Areas (MVAs) and thus IOL in terrestrial haul- 2 km were not identified in this submission. outs (Subsurface)1 WS-02: Site # 41, HTOs are generally concerned about Walrus Haul-outs identifying the locations of haul-outs Total area of 5-km (Ulliit) (continued) 2 because the information may be used by marine and 800-m 11,158 km cruise ships, tourism operators and terrestrial setbacks adventurers to visit these sensitive walrus habitats, leading to increased harassment. Approximate area of HTOs are also concerned that set-backs subsurface 0 km2 may not be enforced effectively. agreements on IOL3 in terrestrial haul-outs and setbacks Community walrus harvesting areas. Note: Number 11 WS-03: CAI – These are ice haul-out areas where walrus Total area (excluding 5,388 km2 Walrus Harvesting are harvested. Walrus haul-out setbacks setbacks) should be added for these areas. Approximate area of 0 km2 IOL1 Number 2 Area (excluding 1: 1,291 km2 setbacks) 2: 309 km2 Area (including 1: 1,865 km2 WS-04: CAI – Walrus calving and post-calving areas. setbacks) 2: 596 km2 Walrus Calving Names: 1: Queens Channel; 2: McDougall and Post-calving Sound Approximate total 76 km2 area of IOL in setbacks (surface) Approximate total 0 km2 area of IOL in setbacks (subsurface) 3 Written Description of Supplementary Information Geographic Amount Submission No. Information Type and Title Number of additional 2 areas Original area 5,110 km2 2 Additional area 1: 852 km 2 Original and additional areas for Site # 73 2: 3,996 km of the 2016 draft NLUP. Named herein WS-05: Site # 73 – Approximate area of after features near centre of each area. 2 Community Area IOL in original area 111 km Current site # 73: Foxe Basin (Nuvuklit). of Interest – Foxe (surface) Additional areas – 1: Foxe Basin (Tasiujaq) ; Basin 2: Foxe Basin (Qinngusaak or Manning Approximate area of 2 Islands) IOL in additional area 44 km (surface) Approximate area of IOL in original and 0 km2 additional areas (subsurface) Caribou wintering areas designated Number 2 WS-06: CAI - individually. Names- 1: Cameron Island Area 1: 739 km2 Caribou Wintering (excluding Bent Horn area); 2: Strathcona 2: 164 km2 River. Approximate area of 0 km2 IOL1 Number 27 Total area 27,729 km2 WS-07: CAI – Approximate area of 6,976 km2 Community caribou and reindeer Caribou and IOL (Surface)1 harvesting areas. Names and sizes of Reindeer individual areas are available upon request. Approximate area of 1,703 km2 Harvesting IOL (Subsurface)1 Approximate area of Parcel HB-03: subsurface 8 km2 agreements on IOL3 4 Written Description of Supplementary Information Geographic Amount Submission No. Information Type and Title Number 25 Total area 49, 256 km2 Caribou calving and post-calving areas Approximate area of 4,552 km2 WS-08: CAI – 1 know to HTOs and of concern to them. IOL (Surface) Caribou Calving Names and sizes of individual areas are and Post-Calving Approximate area of 746 km2 available upon request. IOL (Subsurface)1 Approximate area of Parcel PI-17: subsurface 26 km2 agreements on IOL3 Number 17 Total marine and 7,622 km2 WS-09: CAI - - Important sea-ice crossing areas for island area Caribou Sea-Ice caribou. Names and sizes of individual Crossings areas are available upon request. Approximate area of 139 km2 IOL (Surface)1 Approximate area of 1 km2, 4 IOL (Subsurface)1 1: 5,964 km2 Area 2: 9,956 km2 3: 2,040 km2 Total: 17,960 2 Caribou migratory corridors. Names: 1. km WS-10: CAI – Approximate area of 4,565 km2 Brodeur Peninsula – Gifford River; 2. Caribou Migration IOL (Surface)1 Melville Peninsula; 3: Cockburn River. Approximate area of 24 km2 IOL (Subsurface)1 Approximate area of Parcel RE-29: subsurface 2 km2 agreements on IOL3 Area 116,035 km2 Approximate area of 14,593 km2 WS-11: CAI – Highly valuable area supported by 8 IOL (Surface)1 MVA, West communities, includes: parts of Baffin Approximate area of 2 Central Baffin Island, some smaller islands and marine 2,391 km IOL (Subsurface)1 Island areas in Foxe Basin. Approximate area of Parcel BI-35: subsurface 627 km2 agreements on IOL3 5 Written Description of Supplementary Information Geographic Amount Submission No.
Recommended publications
  • Green Paper the Lancaster Sound Region

    Green Paper the Lancaster Sound Region

    Green Paper The Lancaster Sound Region: 1980-2000 Issues and Options on the Use and Management of the Region Lancaster Sound Regional Study H.J. Dirschl Project Manager January 1982 =Published under the authority of the Hon. John C. Munro, P.C., M.P., Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, Ottawa, 1981. 05-8297-020-EE-A1 Catalogue No. R72-164/ 1982E ISBN 0-662-11869 Cette publication peut aussi etre obtenue en francais. Preface In the quest for a "best plan" for Lancaster Sound criticisms. This feedback is discussed in detail in a and its abundant resources, this public discussion recently puolished report by the workshop chairman. paper seeks to stimulate a continued. wide-ranging, Professor Peter Jacobs, entitled People. Resources examination of the issues involved in the future use and the Environment: Perspectives on the Use and and management of this unique area of the Canadian Management of the Lancaster Sound Region. All the Arctic. input received during the public review phase has been taken into consideration in the preparation of the The green paper is the result of more than two years final green paper. of work by the Northern Affairs Program of the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern From the beginning of the study, it was expected that Development, in co-operation with the government of to arrive at an overall consensus of the optimum fu­ the Northwest Territories and the federal departments ture use and management of the Lancaster Sound of Energy, Mines and Resources, Environment. region would require intensive public discussion fol­ Fisheries and Oceans.
  • Atlantic Walrus Odobenus Rosmarus Rosmarus

    Atlantic Walrus Odobenus Rosmarus Rosmarus

    COSEWIC Assessment and Update Status Report on the Atlantic Walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus in Canada SPECIAL CONCERN 2006 COSEWIC COSEPAC COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF COMITÉ SUR LA SITUATION ENDANGERED WILDLIFE DES ESPÈCES EN PÉRIL IN CANADA AU CANADA COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC 2006. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the Atlantic walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. ix + 65 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Previous reports: COSEWIC 2000. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Atlantic walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus (Northwest Atlantic Population and Eastern Arctic Population) in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 23 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Richard, P. 1987. COSEWIC status report on the Atlantic walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus (Northwest Atlantic Population and Eastern Arctic Population) in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-23 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge D.B. Stewart for writing the status report on the Atlantic Walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada, overseen and edited by Andrew Trites, Co-chair, COSEWIC Marine Mammals Species Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: (819) 997-4991 / (819) 953-3215 Fax: (819) 994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Évaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur la situation du morse de l'Atlantique (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus) au Canada – Mise à jour.
  • 198 13. Repulse Bay. This Is an Important Summer Area for Seals

    198 13. Repulse Bay. This Is an Important Summer Area for Seals

    198 13. Repulse Bay. This is an important summer area for seals (Canadian Wildlife Service 1972) and a primary seal-hunting area for Repulse Bay. 14. Roes Welcome Sound. This is an important concentration area for ringed seals and an important hunting area for Repulse Bay. Marine traffic, materials staging, and construction of the crossing could displace seals or degrade their habitat. 15. Southampton-Coats Island. The southern coastal area of Southampton Island is an important concentration area for ringed seals and is the primary ringed and bearded seal hunting area for the Coral Harbour Inuit. Fisher and Evans Straits and all coasts of Coats Island are important seal-hunting areas in late summer and early fall. Marine traffic, materials staging, and construction of the crossing could displace seals or degrade their habitat. 16.7.2 Communities Affected Communities that could be affected by impacts on seal populations are Resolute and, to a lesser degree, Spence Bay, Chesterfield Inlet, and Gjoa Haven. Effects on Arctic Bay would be minor. Coral Harbour and Repulse Bay could be affected if the Quebec route were chosen. Seal meat makes up the most important part of the diet in Resolute, Spence Bay, Coral Harbour, Repulse Bay, and Arctic Bay. It is a secondary, but still important food in Chesterfield Inlet and Gjoa Haven. Seal skins are an important source of income for Spence Bay, Resolute, Coral Harbour, Repulse Bay, and Arctic Bay and a less important income source for Chesterfield Inlet and Gjoa Haven. 16.7.3 Data Gaps Major data gaps concerning impacts on seal populations are: 1.
  • Final Complete Dissertation Kua 1

    Final Complete Dissertation Kua 1

    Trends and Ontology of Artistic Practices of the Dorset Culture 800 BC - 1300 AD Hardenberg, Mari Publication date: 2013 Document version Early version, also known as pre-print Citation for published version (APA): Hardenberg, M. (2013). Trends and Ontology of Artistic Practices of the Dorset Culture 800 BC - 1300 AD. København: Det Humanistiske Fakultet, Københavns Universitet. Download date: 08. Apr. 2020 Trends and Ontology of Artistic Practices of the Dorset Culture 800 BC – 1300 AD Volume 1 By © Mari Hardenberg A Dissertation Submitted to the Ph.d.- School In Partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy SAXO-Institute, Department of Prehistoric Archaeology, Faculty of Humanities University of Copenhagen August 2013 Copenhagen Denmark ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the various artistic carvings produced by the hunter-gatherer Dorset people who occupied the eastern Arctic and temperate regions of Canada and Greenland between circa BC 800 – AD 1300. It includes considerations on how the carved objects affected and played a role in Dorset social life. To consider the role of people, things and other beings that may be said to play as actors in interdependent entanglements of actions, the agency/actor- network theory is employed. From this theoretical review an interpretation of social life as created by the ways people interact with the material world is presented. This framework is employed as a lens into the social role and meaning the carvings played in the Dorset society. The examined assemblages were recovered from a series of Dorset settlement sites, mainly in house, midden, and burial contexts, providing a substantive case study through which variations and themes of carvings are studied.
  • Community Areas of Interest – Multiple Values

    Community Areas of Interest – Multiple Values

    Written Submission No. 36 2016 Draft Nunavut Land Use Plan Proposed Land Use Designation: Community Areas of Interest – Multiple Values - 36A. Allen Bay - Resolute Passage – Resolute Bay, 36B. Southeastern Bathurst Island – Western McDougall Sound, 36C. Southwestern Bathurst Island, and 36D. Maury Channel To: The Nunavut Planning Commission From: The Qikiqtaaluk Wildlife Board (QWB), and the Hunters and Trappers Organization (HTO) of Resolute Bay Background Information: Multiple resources are highly valued by the Inuit of Resolute Bay in four areas (i.e., Multiple Value Areas, MVAs). One of these areas (MVA 36A) is a marine area with islands close to the hamlet of Resolute Bay, and includes Allen Bay and Resolute Passage. MVA 36B is a terrestrial and marine area on southeastern Bathurst Island and western McDougall Sound. MVA 36C is a terrestrial area on southwestern Bathurst Island, and MVA 36D is a marine area north of Cornwallis Island in Maury Channel. Without protection of these four areas, plus others, the Nunavut Land Use Plan will fail in its goal to protect and promote the well-being of all of Nunavut’s residents as a primary purpose of land use planning under Article 11 of the Nunavut Agreement. All of these MVAs are important community harvesting areas for wildlife, including but not limited to: ringed, bearded and harp seals, beluga, narwhal, bowhead, walrus, Peary caribou, muskoxen, wolves, snow geese, brant, common and king eiders, Arctic char, and polar bears. All of these areas are critically important to maintain the health, culture and heritage of the Inuit of Resolute Bay. 1 Industrial development in or near these areas would degrade their value.
  • Ice Navigation in Canadian Waters

    Ice Navigation in Canadian Waters

    Ice Navigation in Canadian Waters Published by: Icebreaking Program, Maritime Services Canadian Coast Guard Fisheries and Oceans Canada Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E6 Cat. No. Fs154-31/2012E-PDF ISBN 978-1-100-20610-3 Revised August 2012 ©Minister of Fisheries and Oceans Canada 2012 Important Notice – For Copyright and Permission to Reproduce, please refer to: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/notices-avis-eng.htm Note : Cette publication est aussi disponible en français. Cover photo: CCGS Henry Larsen in Petermann Fjord, Greenland, by ice island in August 2012. Canadian Coast Guard Ice Navigation in Canadian Waters Record of Amendments RECORD OF AMENDMENTS TO ICE NAVIGATION IN CANADIAN WATERS (2012 VERSION) FROM MONTHLY NOTICES TO MARINERS NOTICES TO INSERTED DATE SUBJECT MARINERS # BY Note: Any inquiries as to the contents of this publication or reports of errors or omissions should be directed to [email protected] Revised August 2012 Page i of 153 Canadian Coast Guard Ice Navigation in Canadian Waters Foreword FOREWORD Ice Navigation in Canadian Waters is published by the Canadian Coast Guard in collaboration with Transport Canada Marine Safety, the Canadian Ice Service of Environment Canada and the Canadian Hydrographic Service of Fisheries and Oceans Canada. The publication is intended to assist ships operating in ice in all Canadian waters, including the Arctic. This document will provide Masters and watchkeeping crew of vessels transiting Canadian ice-covered waters with the necessary understanding of the regulations, shipping support services, hazards and navigation techniques in ice. Chapter 1, Icebreaking and Shipping Support Services, pertains to operational considerations, such as communications and reporting requirements as well as ice advisories and icebreaker support within Canadian waters.
  • Seasonal Summary

    Seasonal Summary

    Canadian Ice Service Seasonal Summary for the Canadian Arctic Summer 2009 Produced by the Canadian Ice Service November 06th, 2009 Seasonal Summary - Canadian Arctic Waters - Summer 2009 -1- Canadian Ice Service Table of Contents Hudson and Foxe .......................................................................................................... 4 June 2009.................................................................................................................... 4 July 2009 ..................................................................................................................... 5 August 2009 ................................................................................................................ 5 September 2009 .......................................................................................................... 6 Eastern and High Arctic.............................................................................................. 12 June 2009.................................................................................................................. 12 July 2009 ................................................................................................................... 13 August 2009 .............................................................................................................. 13 September 2009 ........................................................................................................ 14 Western and Central Arctic .......................................................................................
  • Seasonal Outlook for North American Arctic Waters Issued by the North American Ice Service on 2 June 2015

    Seasonal Outlook for North American Arctic Waters Issued by the North American Ice Service on 2 June 2015

    Seasonal Outlook North American Arctic Waters Summer 2015 By the North American Ice Service Seasonal outlook for North American Arctic Waters issued by the North American Ice Service on 2 June 2015. Hudson Bay, Davis Strait and Labrador Coast Summer temperature and ice outlook. Average air temperatures will be near normal over most locations from June to August except for slightly above normal over western Hudson Bay and southern Labrador Coast. However temperatures will be slightly below normal over eastern Hudson Bay and in Davis Strait. In general, forecast ice events are expected to be near normal for most locations this summer except earlier than normal for Hudson Strait, Ungava Bay and southwestern Hudson Bay. Southern Labrador Coast. Over the southern section bergy water. Over the northern section open drift first-year ice with a trace of old ice within 120 miles of the coast. Outlook for June…Open drift ice becoming very open drift ice during the second week. Ice melting completely during the third week. Outlook for July…Bergy water. Northern Labrador Coast. Close to very close pack first-year ice with a trace of old ice within 120 miles of the coast. A narrow zone of very open drift first-year ice along the coast. Outlook for June…Close to very close pack ice becoming open drift ice during the fourth week of June. Outlook for July…Open drift ice melting completely during the second week of July then bergy water. Outlook for August…Bergy water. Lake Melville. Close pack first-year ice except open water along the northern shore.
  • Resolute Bay

    Resolute Bay

    Qikiqtani Truth Commission Community Histories 1950–1975 Resolute Bay Qikiqtani Inuit Association Published by Inhabit Media Inc. www.inhabitmedia.com Inhabit Media Inc. (Iqaluit), P.O. Box 11125, Iqaluit, Nunavut, X0A 1H0 (Toronto), 146A Orchard View Blvd., Toronto, Ontario, M4R 1C3 Design and layout copyright © 2013 Inhabit Media Inc. Text copyright © 2013 Qikiqtani Inuit Association Photography copyright © 2013 Library and Archives Canada, Northwest Territories Archives, and Tim Kalusha Originally published in Qikiqtani Truth Commission: Community Histories 1950–1975 by Qikiqtani Inuit Association, April 2014. ISBN 978-1-927095-62-1 All rights reserved. The use of any part of this publication reproduced, transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, or stored in a retrievable system, without written consent of the publisher, is an infringement of copyright law. We acknowledge the support of the Government of Canada through the Department of Canadian Heritage Canada Book Fund program. We acknowledge the support of the Canada Council for the Arts for our publishing program. Please contact QIA for more information: Qikiqtani Inuit Association PO Box 1340, Iqaluit, Nunavut, X0A 0H0 Telephone: (867) 975-8400 Toll-free: 1-800-667-2742 Fax: (867) 979-3238 Email: [email protected] Errata Despite best efforts on the part of the author, mistakes happen. The following corrections should be noted when using this report: Administration in Qikiqtaaluk was the responsibility of one or more federal departments prior to 1967 when the Government of the Northwest Territories was became responsible for the provision of almost all direct services. The term “the government” should replace all references to NANR, AANDC, GNWT, DIAND.
  • The Late Wisconsinan and Holocene Record of Walrus (Odobenus Rosmarus) from North America: a Review with New Data from Arctic and Atlantic Canada ARTHUR S

    The Late Wisconsinan and Holocene Record of Walrus (Odobenus Rosmarus) from North America: a Review with New Data from Arctic and Atlantic Canada ARTHUR S

    ARCTIC VOL. 52, NO. 2 (JUNE 1999) P. 160–181 The Late Wisconsinan and Holocene Record of Walrus (Odobenus rosmarus) from North America: A Review with New Data from Arctic and Atlantic Canada ARTHUR S. DYKE,1 JAMES HOOPER,2 C. RICHARD HARINGTON3 and JAMES M. SAVELLE4 (Received 30 March 1998; accepted in revised form 20 October 1998) ABSTRACT. The Late Wisconsinan and Holocene record of the Atlantic walrus is known from numerous collections of bones and tusks from Arctic Canada and south to North Carolina, as well as from many archaeological sites in the Arctic and Subarctic. In contrast, the Pacific walrus has no dated Late Wisconsinan or early Holocene record in North America, and it may have been displaced into the northwest Pacific at Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). The Atlantic walrus rapidly exploited newly deglaciated territory, moving northward from its LGM refugium and reaching the Bay of Fundy by 12800 B.P., the Grand Banks by 12500 B.P., southern Labrador by 11 500 B.P., and the central Canadian Arctic Archipelago (CAA) by 9700 B.P. Its southern range limit may have retracted to the Bay of Fundy by ca. 7500 B.P. Within the CAA, walrus remains cluster in two main age groups: 9700 to 8500 B.P. and 5000 to 4/3000 B.P. This pattern strongly resembles the distribution of bowhead whale radiocarbon ages from the same area, which suggests a common control by sea-ice conditions. Walrus remains occur in Indian culture archaeological sites as old as 7500 B.P. and, in some cases (Namu, British Columbia, and Mackinac Island, Michigan), they evidently represent long-distance human transport.
  • Marine Navigationalert

    Marine Navigationalert

    Marine Navigation Alert Jeppesen MARINE NAVIGATION ALERTS contain significant information affecting Jeppesen Charts and/or Technology. They are regularly updated at www.jeppesen.com/marinealerts/ Date: October 10 , 2012 Subject: Removal of Canadian charts from C-MAP by Jeppesen products (see Table 1 for a detailed list of charts removed) Affected Products: C-MAP NT, C-MAP NT+, C-MAP (iOS) , C-MAP MAX, C-MAP MAX Pro, C-MAP 4D , C-MAP 4D EMBEDDED, C-MAP MAX EMBEDDED, C-MAP WORLDFOLIO (Passport Charts), C-MAP by Jeppesen MM3D (see Table 2 at the end of this document for a detailed list of affected products) Jeppesen would like to inform its customers operating in Canadian waters that per contractual requirements with the Canadian Hydrographic Service (CHS), Jeppesen has removed select charts from its products which were derived from official CHS paper charts. The Canadian Hydrographic Service (CHS) considers these charts inadequate for conversion to digital format, and for use in digital navigation systems (including GPS Chart Plotters). To minimize the impact of this change, areas where charts were removed have been covered with smaller scale charts, whenever possible. As a consequence of removing these charts, Jeppesen has discontinued a number of cartridge codes (see the list of affected cartridges below). Jeppesen customers in possession of the following cartridges won’t be able to update their products until further notice : C-MAP NT+: M-NA-C126.31, M-NA-C152.31, M-NA-C176.31, M-NA-C178.31, M-NA-C179.31, M-NA-C209.31, M-NA-C210.31, M-NA-C217.31, M-NA-C218.31, M-NA-C219.31, M-NA-C221.31, M-NA-C222.31, M-NA-C250.31 C-MAP MAX: M-NA-M048.21, M-NA-M176.21, M-NA-M178.21, M-NA-M179.21, M-NA-M209.21, M-NA-M210.21, M-NA-M217.21, M-NA-M218.21, M-NA-M219.21, M-NA-M250.21, M-NA- M330.21 C-MAP 4D: M-NA-D048.08, M-NA-D176.08, M-NA-D178.08, M-NA-D179.08, M-NA-D209.08, M- NA-D210.08, M-NA-D217.08, M-NA-D218.08, M-NA-D219.08, M-NA-D250.08, M-NA-D330.08 iOS: M-NA-I048.08 Jeppesen will continue to work with CHS to provide high quality chart coverage as soon as possible.
  • LNG Transport in Parry Channel: Possible Environmental Hazards Brian D

    LNG Transport in Parry Channel: Possible Environmental Hazards Brian D

    LNG Transport in Parry Channel: Possible environmental hazards Brian D. Smiley and Allen R. Milne Institute of Ocean Sciences, Patricia Bay Sidney, B.C. ": t 005562 LNG TRANSPORT IN PARRY CHANNEL: POSSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS By ". .' Brian D. Smiley and Allen R. Milne Institute of Ocean Sciences, Patricia Bay Sidney, B.C. 1979 This is a manuscript which ha~ received only limited circulation. On citing this report in a 1;:libliography, tl;1e title should be followed 1;:ly the words "UNPUELISHED MANUSCRIPT" which is in accordance with accepted bib­ liographic custom. (i) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Table of Contents (i) Li s t of Fi gures (i i) List of Tables (i i i) Map of Parry Channel (i v) Acknowl edgments ( i v) l. SUMMARY 2. I NTRODUCTI ON 3 3. ARCTIC PILOT PROJECT 7 3.1 Components 7 3.2 Gas Delivery Rate 7 3.3 Energy Efficiency 7 3.4 Properties of LNG 8 3.5 Carrier Characteristics 8 3.6 Carrier Operation 8 3.7: The Future 9 4. ACCIDENTS . 10 5. ICE AND LNG ICEBREAKERS IN PARRY CHANNEL 12 5.1 Ice Drift and Surface Circulation 12 5.2 Wi nter Ice Cover 13 5.3 The Icebreaker's Wake in Ice 15 5.4 Routing through Ice 18 6. CLIMATE AND LNG ICEBREAKERS IN PARRY CHANNEL 20 6.1 Long-term Climate Trends 21 7. ECOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF PARRY CHANNEL 22 8. WILDLIFE AND LNG ICEBREAKERS IN PARRY CHANNEL 26 8.1 Seabirds 26 8.2 Ringed Seals 29 8.3 Bearded Seals 33 8.4 Polar Bears 33 8.5 Whales 36 8.6 Harp Seals 37 8.7 Wal ruses 38 8.8 Caribou 38 9.