DOCSLIB.ORG

LA Board of Commissioners Department of Mel Levine, President Water & Power Cynthia Mcclain-Hill, Vice President EEQ Jill Banks Barad Christina E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LA Board of Commissioners Department of Mel Levine, President Water & Power Cynthia Mcclain-Hill, Vice President EEQ Jill Banks Barad Christina E Los Angeles Eric Garcetti, Mayor LA Board of Commissioners Department of Mel Levine, President Water & Power Cynthia McClain-Hill, Vice President EEQ Jill Banks Barad Christina E. Noonan CUSTOMERS FIRST Susana Reyes Susan A. Rodriguez, Secretary Martin L. Adams, Interim General Manager and Chief Engineer August 28, 2019 The Honorable City Council c/o Office of the City Clerk Room 395, City Hall Mai! Stop 160 Attention: Councilmember Greig Smith Chair - Information, Technology, and General Services (ITGS) Committee Councilmember David E. Ryu Chair - Health, Education, Neighborhoods, Parks, Arts, and River (HENPAR) Committee Honorable Members: Subject: Council File No. 18-0301 - City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, Department of General Services, and Department of Recreation and Parks Report on the Feasibility of Expanding Publicly Accessible Hydration Stations at Parks and Municipal Facilities. Per the April 11, 2018 motion and the June 12, 2019 Information, Technology, and General Services Committee meeting (Enclosure 1), the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP), Department of General Services (GSD), and Department of Recreation and Parks (RAP) are providing their report on the feasibility of expanding publicly accessible hydration stations at their facilities, and LADWP’s role in supporting RAP and GSD. LADWP, GSD, and RAP are working together to meet the Mayor’s New Green Deal goal of installing 200 hydration stations throughout the City of Los Angeles by 2035. A hydration station is any device that dispenses drinking water and must include a bottle filling mechanism or allow for bottles to be filled. This report summarizes the process, including criteria for site selection to expand the installation of hydration stations. Furthermore, the report includes estimates for installation, maintenance, and other related costs. I. Purpose The purpose of the Hydration Station program is to help achieve the goals of: • Providing public access to drinking water; 111 N. Hope Street. Los Angeles. California 90012-2607 Mailing Acldress PQ Box 51111, Los Angeles, CA 90051-5700 Telephone (213) 367-4211 ladwp.com The Honorable City Council Page 2 August 28, 2019 • Improving consumer confidence of drinking tap water; and « Reducing single-use plastic bottle waste. II. Proposed criteria for installation LADWP, GSD, and RAP are committed to providing public access to drinking water. Achieving this will involve the installation of hydration stations at publicly accessible, highly visited/populated locations. Installation of hydration stations is a multistep process which varies with each site and may be a retrofit or new installation. Renovations of existing drinking fountains may be easier than new installations because there is existing plumbing. The hydration station installation process is as follows: o Conduct a department-wide inventory of existing hydration stations and water fountains o Identify eligible sites o Assess the site location for criteria to be met o Conduct wall inspection and necessary construction o Install the required plumbing and drainage or retrofit existing conditions to accommodate the new hydration station o Install a standard hydration station per facility type, include marketing signage, and test operability • Site selection - Each agency (LADWP, GSD, RAP) will determine which of their respective sites will meet the criteria for this program. To date, LADWP has selected their 11 (of 14) publicly accessible Customer Service Centers (CSCs) for the hydration station installations/retrofits. Please find the list of CSCs enclosed (Enclosure 2). GSD has preliminarily identified approximately 50 municipal sites located throughout various Council Districts as potential sites for hydration stations (Enclosure 3). GSD has identified 4 of these sites to pilot hydration station installations (Pacoima City Hall, Main City Hall, Hollywood Neighborhood City Hall, and the North Central Animal Shelter). GSD will proceed with this pilot program right away and will pursue reimbursement after the LADWP/GSD MOU has been finalized. Currently, RAP has over 1,300 drinking water fountains, with 109 of those retrofitted into hydration stations throughout 66 city parks (Enclosure 4). RAP will identify park facilities throughout every Council District as potential sites for installation of additional hydration stations to assist with meeting the Mayor’s goal The Honorable City Council Page 3 August 28, 2019 of 200 locations by 2035. RAP has selected 62 facilities as priority sites to commence installation (Enclosure 5). • Location Criteria - Each agency will identify the best locations at their respective facilities. Proper location selection for the hydration stations is critical for maintaining water quality. Ideally, selected areas will have short plumbing runs, be on high use lines (i.e., restroom supply line), are protected from the outdoor elements (i.e., shaded from direct sunlight), and easily accessible to the public. • Equipment - Hydration stations will facilitate the use of reusable bottles. Filters are not recommended. Filters are not necessary because LADWP serves high- quality drinking water. Filters also require periodic maintenance and change-outs which will increase maintenance costs. Failure to maintain the filter may create potential water quality issues. Furthermore, hydration stations with chillers are recommended for indoor use as consumers prefer water at cooler temperatures. Please find the list of indoor and outdoor hydration station models that meet the equipment requirements (Enclosure 6). • Signage - To meet the purpose of promoting drinking tap water, LADWP will provide signage for select hydration stations installed as part of this program. LADWP will also provide replacement signage as needed. • Maintenance - Each agency (LADWP, GSD, RAP) will be responsible for maintaining and cleaning hydration stations installed on their respective facilities. III. Cost estimate for installation of hydration stations The estimated cost for installation of each indoor hydration station with cooling system at LADWP Customer Service Centers is $6,655 - $25,325 (Enclosure 7). Per RAP, the estimated installation cost for each outdoor hydration station is $12,000 - $25,000. Both estimates include equipment, materials, maintenance, and other related expenses. The cost varies depending on the amount of plumbing required for the selected site, location, and repairs needed to floors, walls, and outdoor concrete. The cost may also increase if hazardous materials are found. GSD will determine the cost estimates for equipment, materials, maintenance, and other related costs once the hydration stations have been installed at their pilot sites. The Honorable City Council Page 4 August 28, 2019 IV. LADWP’s role in supporting RAP and GSD LADWP is preparing two separate Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) with GSD and RAP to partially finance hydration stations installed at publicly accessible locations on their respective facilities. RAP and GSD will proceed with the installation process and will pursue reimbursement once the MOU have been finalized. For additional information, please contact Ms. Winifred J. Yancy, Director of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs, at (213) 367-0025. Sincerely, £ Martin L. Adams Michael A. Shull Interim General Manager and General Manager Chief Engineer City of Los Angeles Department of Los Angeles Department of Recreation and Parks Water and Power Tony M. Royster General Manager City of Los Angeles Department of General Services DR:lb Enclosures c/enc: Councilmember Monica Rodriguez, ITGS Committee Councilmember Bob Blumenfield, ITGS Committee Councilmember Mitch O’Farrell, HENPAR Committee Councilmember Curren D. Price, HENPAR Committee Ms. Leyla Campos, Legislative Assistant Mr. Eric Villanueva, Legislative Assistant Ms. Winifred J. Yancy in INFORMATION, I n il_. MOTION The City of Los Angeles has implemented many policies that have improved the environment and the quality of life for its residents. These efforts place it at the forefront of the sustainability movement and include improving water and air quality, implementing renewable energy sources, and requiring reuse and recycling. The City should continue these environmental efforts by introducing and expanding hydration station locations at parks and facilities throughout the City. In 2015, the City of Orlando, Florida installed 30 new hydration stations at its parks, community and neighborhood centers. This effort was done in partnership with its local water agency. The hydration stations are intended to save Orlando's residents time and money by allowing them to reuse waterbodies conveniently, reduce the number of plastic water bottles recycled, and provide easy access to clean water. In 2016, the City of Los Angeles introduced a hydration station in City Hall East. However, more hydration stations should be installed throughout the City. In addition, the City should identity existing water fountains at parks and facilities and seek to convert them into hydration stations. In this manner, the City can more effectively meet its sustainability objectives and improve the quality of life of its residents. I THEREFORE MOVE that the General Services Department and Department of Recreation and Parks, with the assistance of the Department of Water and Power, report to the Council in 30 days on the feasibility of introducing and expanding hydration stations at parks and municipal facilities in order to promote the use
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FY17-18 Park Fee Annual Report
    FOR INFORMATION ONLY CITY OF LOS ANGELES Department of Recreation and Parks November 7, 2018 TO: Board of Recreation and Parks Commissioners FROM: Michael A. Shull, General Manager SUBJECT: PARK FEE ANNUAL REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017-2018 SUMMARY On September 7, 2016, the City Council approved the new Park Dedication and Fee Update Ordinance (Park Fee Ordinance), Ordinance No. 184,505, and approved a Resolution relative to a General Plan Amendment to amend the Public Recreation Plan of the Service Systems Element of the City of Los Angeles General Plan. The Park Fee Ordinance implemented a new development impact fee that requires all new residential dwelling units to dedicate land, or pay a fee in-lieu, or provide a combination of land dedication and fee payment, for the purpose of acquiring, expanding, and improving park and recreational facilities for new residents. Pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 12.33 1.2, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, the Department of Recreation and Parks (RAP) shall report on each of the park and recreational facilities on which fees were committed in the last fiscal year ·and the appropriate date by which construction of the park and recreational facilities will commence and maintain accounts and prepare reports in accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act ( Government Code Section 66000 et seq.). Section 66006 of the Mitigation Fee Act requires that each local agency that imposes developmental impact fees prepare an annual report providing specific information on those fees. Section 66001 of the Mitigation Fee Act also requires that the local agency makes findings every five years with respect to the purpose and nexus of the imposed fee, the sources and amounts of all of funding anticipated to complete financing in incomplete improvements and the approximate dates on which the previously identified funding is expected to be deposited into the appropriate account or fund.
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of HUBER HEIGHTS STATE of OHIO City Dog Park Committee Meeting Minutes March 29, 2018 6:00 P.M
    Agenda Page 1 of 1 CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS STATE OF OHIO City Dog Park Committee March 29, 2018 6:00 P.M. City Hall – 6131 Taylorsville Road – Council Chambers 1. Call Meeting To Order/Roll Call: 2. Approval of Minutes: A. March 22, 2018 3. Topics of Discussion: A. City Dog Park Planning and Discussion 4. Adjournment: https://destinyhosted.com/print_all.cfm?seq=3604&reloaded=true&id=48237 3/29/2018 CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS STATE OF OHIO City Dog Park Committee Meeting Minutes March 29, 2018 6:00 P.M. City Hall – 6131 Taylorsville Road – City Council Chambers Meeting Started at 6:00pm 1. Call Meeting To Order/Roll Call: Members present: Bryan Detty, Keith Hensley, Vicki Dix, Nancy Byrge, Vincent King & Richard Shaw Members NOT present: Toni Webb • Nina Deam was resigned from the Committee 2. Approval of Minutes: No Minutes to Approval 3. Topics of Discussion: A. City Dog Park Planning and Discussion • Mr. King mentioned the “Meet Me at the Park” $20,000 Grant campaign. • Mr. Detty mentioned the Lowe’s communication. • Ms. Byrge discussed the March 29, 2018 email (Copy Enclosed) • Mr. Shaw discussed access to a Shared Drive for additional information. • Mr. King shared concerns regarding “Banning” smoking at the park as no park in Huber is currently banned. • Ms. Byrge suggested Benches inside and out of the park area. • Mr. Hensley and the committee discussed in length the optional sizes for the park. • Mr. Detty expressed interest in a limestone entrance area. • Mr. Hensley suggested the 100ft distance from the North line of the Neighbors and the School property line to the South.
    [Show full text]
  • No State Or Local Agencies Have Specific Jurisdiction Over Paleontological Resources on Private Lands
    3.10 Paleontological Resources STATE REGULATIONS No state or local agencies have specific jurisdiction over paleontological resources on private lands. No state agency requires a paleontological collecting permit to allow for the recovery of fossil remains discovered as a result of construction-related earthmoving on state or private land at a project site. LOCAL PLANS AND POLICIES There are no regional and local plans, policies, regulations, or laws related to paleontological resources that apply to the General Plan update. PROFESSIONAL PALEONTOLOGICAL STANDARDS The Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, a national scientific organization of professional vertebrate paleontologists, has established standard guidelines that outline acceptable professional practices in the conduct of paleontological resource assessments and surveys, monitoring and mitigation, data and fossil recovery, sampling procedures, specimen preparation, analysis, and curation (Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 1995, 1996). Most practicing professional paleontologists in the nation adhere to the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology assessment, mitigation, and monitoring requirements, as specifically spelled out in its standard guidelines. 3.10.3 THRESHOLDS FOR DETERMINING SIGNIFICANCE The impact of the proposed project related to paleontological resources would be considered significant if it would exceed the following threshold of significance, in accordance with Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines: ► Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geological feature. In its standard guidelines for assessment and mitigation of adverse impacts on paleontological resources, the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (1995) established three categories of sensitivity for paleontological resources: high, low, and undetermined. Areas where fossils have been previously found are considered to have a high sensitivity and a high potential to produce fossils.
    [Show full text]
  • March 13, 2015 To: Honorable Council Members
    FORM GEN. 160 (Rev. 6-80) CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE Date: March 13, 2015 To: Honorable Council Members From: Gary Lee Moore, City Engineer Bureau of Engineering Subject: CITY SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM STATUS UPDATE NO. 1 (COUNCIL FILE 14-0163-S4) This document is prepared in response to the CF 14-0163-S4 relative to the City Sidewalk Repair Program. Specifically, Council instructed the Bureau of Engineering (BOE) to report back on the status of implementation of the Sidewalk Repair Program, including any required policies, hiring of employees, utilization of contractors and amount of sidewalk repairs completed. Program Progress On February 3, 2015, the City Council approved implementation of a FY 2014-2015 Sidewalk Repair Program for repair of sidewalks adjacent to City facilities. BOE was established as the Program Manager. A kickoff meeting was held on February 9, 2015, and subsequent meetings have been held on a weekly basis. The meetings are well attended and include the Mayor’s Office, Board of Public Works (BPW), Bureau of Contract Administration (BCA), Bureau of Street Lighting (BSL), Bureau of Street Services (BSS), City Administrative Officer (CAO), Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), Department of Recreation and Parks (RAP) and the Department of Transportation (DOT). BOE appreciates the participation and collaborative efforts that have taken place to start the Program, and the cooperation has allowed us to accomplish a great deal in a relatively short time frame. On February 10, 2015, BOE immediately began assessment of the list of City Facilities that were provided by each Department as requested by the CAO.
    [Show full text]
  • LA Zoo Vision Plan
    3.14 Recreation 3.14 RECREATION The Zoo is a unique attraction within Griffith Park and the greater Los Angeles area. The proposed Project is expected to increase visitation to the Zoo and surrounding area, creating the potential for additional use and physical deterioration of recreational facilities, including those within the Zoo and Griffith Park. Additionally, proposed expansion to the Zoo and associated recreational facilities could result in physical impacts to the surrounding environment. However, proposed expansion in visitor-serving areas and public parkland would accommodate the projected increase in use, reducing potential for adverse impacts. Therefore, impacts to recreational facilities from the Project would be less than significant. This section addresses recreational facilities that would be affected by the Los Angeles Zoo Vision Plan (Vision Plan) in the City of Los Angeles (City). The analysis describes the regulatory setting, the existing conditions at the Zoo and vicinity, and the potential impact of the implementation of the Vision Plan (Project) on recreational facilities. Impact analysis considers the potential for physical detriment or reduction in access to existing recreational facilities and whether development of new recreational facilities would significantly affect the environment. 3.14.1 Environmental Setting Regulatory Setting State and local laws and regulations have been enacted to ensure adequate provision of recreational facilities in the City. There are no federal regulations that apply to the Project. State Regulations Quimby Act (California Government Code Section 66477) The Quimby Act (California Government Code Section 66477) was established in 1965 by the California Legislature to set forth provisions in the State Subdivision Map Act for the dedication of parkland (e.g., dedication ratio of three acres per 1,000 population) and/or payment of in-lieu fees as a condition of approval of certain types of residential development projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Parks Service Area Map City of Los Angeles, California Current Recommended Guideline of 8.0 Acres Per 1,000 Residents
    Regional Parks Service Area Map City of Los Angeles, California Current Recommended Guideline of 8.0 Acres per 1,000 Residents ¦¨§14 THE CASCADES GOLF CLUB 1 WILSON CANYON PARK THE CASCADES GOLF CLUB 2 EL CARISO REGIONAL COUNTY PARK O'MELVENY PARK EL CARISO GOLF COURSE Recreation LIMEKILN CANYON PARK KNOLLWOOD COUNTY GOLF COURSE and Parks BROWNS CREEK PARK ALISO CANYON PARK Ventura Department 118 ¦¨§ ANGELES NATIONAL FOREST Needs Assessment SANTA SUSANA PASS STATE HISTORIC PARK HANSEN DAM QUARRY LAKE HANSEN DAM RECREATION AREA CHATSWORTH PARK, SOUTH HANSEN DAM GOLF COURSE DEUKMEJIAN WILDERNESS PARK North Valley APC CHATSWORTH RESERVOIR SITE ¦¨§210 LA TUNA CANYON PARK VERDUGO MOUNTAIN PARK BELL CANYON OPEN SPACE 1 BELL CANYON PARK EL ESCORPION PARK ¦¨§170 KNAPP RANCH PARK VALLEY PLAZA PARK BEILENSON (ANTHONY C.) PARK BALBOA SPORTS CENTER WOODLEY AVENUE PARK BALBOA GOLF COURSE South Valley APC ¦¨§101 ENCINO GOLF COURSE LOS ENCINOS STATE HISTORIC PARK NORTH HOLLYWOOD PARK GRIFFITH PARK: L.A. EQUESTRIAN CENTER VAN NUYS ‐ SHERMAN OAKS PARK ¦¨§134 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE HARDING GOLF COURSE STATE PARK LAND 10 WILSON GOLF COURSE 5 STATE PARK LAND 8 ¦¨§ WESTRIDGE CANYONBACK PARK 1 FOSSIL RIDGE PARK WILACRE PARK GRIFFITH PARK DIXIE CANYON PARKSTATE PARK LAND 7 SEPULVEDA PASS OPEN SPACE 2SEPULVEDA PASS OPEN SPACE 1 STATE PARK LAND 4 GRIFFITH PARK: BRONSON CANYON FRYMAN CANYON PARK ROOSEVELT GOLF COURSE BEVERLY GLEN PARK WESTRIDGE CANYONBACK PARK 2 STATE PARK LAND 1 RUNYON CANYON PARK ARROYO SECO PARK STATE PARK LAND 5 STATE PARK LAND 2 ELYSIAN VALLEY
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Neighborhood
    CITY OF LOS ANGELES HOLLYWOOD HILLS WEST CALIFORNIA HOLLYWOOD HILLS WEST NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL OFFICERS NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL PRESIDENT C/O Department of Neighborhood ANASTASIA MANN Empowerment 3516 N. Broadway VICE-PRESIDENT Los Angeles, CA 90031 ORRIN FELDMAN TELEPHONE: (213) 485-1588 SECOND VICE PRESIDENT JANE CROCKETT FAX: (213) 485-1836 Toll Free 1 (866) LA HELPS SECRETARY BRITTA ENGSTROM TREASURER MATT SHICTHMAN HOLLYWOOD HILLS WEST NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL BOARD MEETING February 19, 2020 6:00 pm Will and Ariel Durant Library Branch 7140 Sunset Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90046 MINUTES 1. Call to order by President, Anastasia Mann at 6:08pm 2. Roll Call by Secretary, Britta Engstrom. Quorum established. Absent: Daniel Savage, Naomi Kobrin, Bob Mansell, Jeff Straebler & Melissa Reeck. 3. Approval of minutes. Jeff Masino made the motion, Danielle Mead 2nd. The minutes were approved 16-0 (1 abstain). 4. Election of Area 9 Chair Candidate: Laurie Adami Laurie was elected by the board 16-0 (1 abstain). 5. Public Official Reports a) CD4 –Field Deputy, Madelynn Taras, Office of Councilmember David Ryu provided an update that they are looking at streets that can be easily paved by BSS vs. those that will need to be capital improvement projects. They have a new planner, Paola Mendez. The Wonder Woman of the 4th Event on March 22nd is coming up and they are taking submissions. She invited everyone to check out the new community calendar on their website. b) CD13 – Sean Starkey, Office of Councilman Mitch O’Farrell spoke about Metro Bike Share which will have 10 new stations coming to Hollywood.
    [Show full text]
  • Runyon Canyon Park March 2019 Dixon Resources Unlimited
    Comprehensive Strategies Report Runyon Canyon Park March 2019 Dixon Resources Unlimited Commissioned by: Los Angeles Council District 4 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 4 Background ................................................................................................................................. 4 1986 Runyon Canyon Master Plan .............................................................................................. 5 Data Analysis Report ....................................................................................................................... 6 Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Parking Occupancy Counts .......................................................................................................... 8 Daily Traffic Volumes ................................................................................................................... 9 Pedestrian Counts ..................................................................................................................... 10 Intercept Surveys....................................................................................................................... 11 Findings ..................................................................................................................................... 11
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America
    Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America There are approximately 101,135sexual abuse claims filed. Of those claims, the Tort Claimants’ Committee estimates that there are approximately 83,807 unique claims if the amended and superseded and multiple claims filed on account of the same survivor are removed. The summary of sexual abuse claims below uses the set of 83,807 of claim for purposes of claims summary below.1 The Tort Claimants’ Committee has broken down the sexual abuse claims in various categories for the purpose of disclosing where and when the sexual abuse claims arose and the identity of certain of the parties that are implicated in the alleged sexual abuse. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a chart that shows the sexual abuse claims broken down by the year in which they first arose. Please note that there approximately 10,500 claims did not provide a date for when the sexual abuse occurred. As a result, those claims have not been assigned a year in which the abuse first arose. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the state or jurisdiction in which they arose. Please note there are approximately 7,186 claims that did not provide a location of abuse. Those claims are reflected by YY or ZZ in the codes used to identify the applicable state or jurisdiction. Those claims have not been assigned a state or other jurisdiction. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the Local Council implicated in the sexual abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Regular Meeting Minutes Board of Recreation And
    REGULAR MEETING MINUTES BOARD OF RECREATION AND PARK COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES Wednesday, December 18, 2019 The Board of Recreation and Park Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles convened the Regular Meeting at EXPO Center at 9:33 a.m. Present were President Sylvia Patsaouras, Vice- President Lynn Alvarez, and Commissioner Joseph Halper. Also present were Michael A. Shull, General Manager, Anthony-Paul Diaz, Executive Officer and Chief of Staff, and Deputy City Attorney III Steven Hong The following Department staff members were present: Vicki Israel, Assistant General Manager, Recreational Services Branch Sophia Piña-Cortez, Assistant General Manager, Special Operations Branch Javier Solis, Superintendent of Maintenance, Planning, Maintenance, & Construction Branch Noel Williams, Chief Financial Officer, Finance Branch CALL TO ORDER Councilmember Curren D. Price, Jr., made opening remarks and welcomed the Board Commissioners and audience to the Ninth council District. Patricia Delgado, Principal Recreation Supervisor I, Aquatic Division, introduced the EXPO Center staff and provided background information about the facility. General Manager Michael A. Shull began the Acknowledgement of Service for Commissioner Pilar Diaz by thanking her for the passion, devotion, and service to the Department. Anthony-Paul Diaz echoed the parting words of Mr. Shull and presented Commissioner Diaz with a Certificate of Recognition on behalf of the Commission. This certificate is signed by all the Commissioners and General Manager to acknowledge her service to the City of Los Angeles. Also, he presented Ms. Diaz with a tile for her to sign that will then be placed on the Greek Theatre's Artists Wall, as is customary for artists who perform at this venue, as well as officials that serve the City.
    [Show full text]
  • 20-048 REVISED April 02, 2020 C
    APR 02 2020 BOARD REPORT NO.------ 20-048 REVISED April 02, 2020 C. D. _ ____:;A....:..:L=L=----- BOARD OF RECREATION AND PARK COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: HYDRATION STATION JNSTALLATION AND/OR RETROFITS AT DEPARTMENT OF RECREATION AND PARKS (RAP) FACILITIES - MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN RAP AND THE LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER AP Diaz S. Pina-Cortez H. Fujita f{ .fc. Santo Domingo D F V. Israel N. Williams General Manager - Approved ______X _ Disapproved ______ Withdrawn ---- RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Approve the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), substantially in the form on file in the Board of Recreation and Park Commissioners (Board) Office and as attached to this Report as Attachment 2, between the Department of Recreation and Parks (RAP) and the Los Angeles Department of Water Power (LADWP), to provide hydration station installation and retrofit projects at RAP facilities; 2. Approve the signage to be displayed at each hydration station installed as part of the MOU in the form attached as Attachment 3 of this Report; 3. Authorize RAP's General Manager to execute the MOU subsequent to all necessary approvals; 4. Authorize RAP's Chief Accounting Employee to establish a new account and appropriation in Fund 205, Department No. 88, Account No. To be Determined (TBD), with the Account name as Hydration Station Installation and Retrofit; and, 5. Authorize RAP's General Manager, or Designee, to make technical corrections as necessary to carry out the intent of this Report. BOARD REPORT PG. 2 NO. 20-048 SUMMARY Mayor Garcetti’s Green New Deal Sustainable City pLAn 2019 states the City agencies intend the following: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Distributor Settlement Agreement
    DISTRIBUTOR SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Table of Contents Page I. Definitions............................................................................................................................1 II. Participation by States and Condition to Preliminary Agreement .....................................13 III. Injunctive Relief .................................................................................................................13 IV. Settlement Payments ..........................................................................................................13 V. Allocation and Use of Settlement Payments ......................................................................28 VI. Enforcement .......................................................................................................................34 VII. Participation by Subdivisions ............................................................................................40 VIII. Condition to Effectiveness of Agreement and Filing of Consent Judgment .....................42 IX. Additional Restitution ........................................................................................................44 X. Plaintiffs’ Attorneys’ Fees and Costs ................................................................................44 XI. Release ...............................................................................................................................44 XII. Later Litigating Subdivisions .............................................................................................49
    [Show full text]