DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1912.06275V2 [Q-Bio.BM] 18 Feb 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1912.06275V2 [Q-Bio.BM] 18 Feb 2021 General Principles of Secondary Active Transporter Function Oliver Beckstein1, a) and Fiona Naughton1 Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe AZ 85287, USA (Dated: February 19, 2021) Transport of ions and small molecules across the cell membrane against electrochemical gradients is catalyzed by integral membrane proteins that use a source of free energy to drive the energetically uphill flux of the transported substrate. Secondary active transporters couple the spontaneous influx of a “driving” ion such as Na+ or H+ to the flux of the substrate. The thermodynamics of such cyclical non-equilibrium systems are well understood and recent work has focused on the molecular mechanism of secondary active transport. The fact that these transporters change their conformation between an inward-facing and outward-facing conformation in a cyclical fashion, called the alternating access model, is broadly recognized as the molecular framework in which to describe transporter function. However, only with the advent of high resolution crystal structures and detailed computer simulations has it become possible to recognize common molecular-level principles between disparate transporter families. Inverted repeat symmetry in secondary active transporters has shed light on how protein structures can encode a bi-stable two-state system. More detailed analysis (based on experimental structural data and detailed molecular dynamics simulations) indicates that transporters can be understood as gated pores with at least two coupled gates. These gates are not just a convenient cartoon element to illustrate a putative mechanism but map to distinct parts of the transporter protein. Enumerating all distinct gate states naturally includes occluded states in the alternating access picture and also suggests what kind of protein conformations might be observable. By connecting the possible conformational states and ion/substrate bound states in a kinetic model, a unified picture emerges in which symporter, antiporter, and uniporter function are extremes in a continuum of functionality. Keywords: membrane protein, transporter, symmetry, molec- during one leg of the cycle while the substrate is bound in the ular mechanisms. other leg and is transported in the opposite direction. Variations of the above scheme are common, though. For instance, many symporters transport another ion back instead I. INTRODUCTION of the apo leg of the transport cycle. Sometimes, the driv- ing ion is effectively part of the substrate as in the AdiC Active transporters are integral membrane proteins that transporter10, which exchanges L-arginine with its decarboxy- move substrate through the membrane against an electro- lated product agmatine to effectively export protons. chemical gradient by using a source of free energy. They A third class of related transporters consists of non-coupled are broadly classified as primary and secondary active trans- transporters. These uniporters facilitate diffusion through the porters, depending on the free energy source1. Primary ac- membrane. Although we specifically focus on active trans- tive transporters harness chemical reactions (e.g., phospho- porters, the discussion on transport cycles (Section VI) will rylation by ATP) or light. Some examples are the sodium- make clear that the uniporters are closely related to active 2 potassium pump (Na/K ATPase) , the rotary F0F1-ATPase and transporters and it is plausible that small changes in the pro- the light-driven proton pump bacteriorhodopsin3, complex I in tein may convert between the two. the respiratory chain4, or ATP-driven ABC transporters such In this review we focus on overarching principles that as p-glycoprotein5. are common across almost all secondary active transporters. Secondary transport is driven by an electrochemical gra- We begin with the alternating access model which provides dient in a driving ion, namely sodium or protons. Exam- the “standard model” for explaining transporter function in ples are neurotransmitter transporters SERT (serotonin) and a structural context (Section II). Although evolution always DAT (dopamine)6, sodium-proton exchangers (NHE)7, the arXiv:1912.06275v2 [q-bio.BM] 18 Feb 2021 finds ways to add a few exceptions to common rules (for in- calcium exchanger8, and AE1, the anion exchanger in red stance, there are a few transporters that do not appear to follow blood cells also known as Band 39). Secondary active trans- the classical alternating access model), the physical principles porters can be divided into two classes based on their physio- under which transporters operate are not negotiable. Trans- logical behavior1. Symporters move their substrate in parallel porters function out of equilibrium as “physical enzymes” that with the driving ion (Figure 1A). Both driving ion and sub- catalyze transport by free energy transduction through cyclic strate are bound at the same time and move in the same di- processes (Section III). Ten years ago, a remarkable insight rection. One part of the transport cycle consists of the move- was found into the evolutionary mechanism that can gener- ment of the substrate- and ion-free (apo) transporter. In the an- ate protein structures that can switch between the two states tiporter transport cycle (Figure 1B), the driving ion is bound of the alternating access model: transporters contain so-called inverted repeat sequences that fold into structures with an in- ternal pseudo two-fold symmetry. This symmetry is broken to generate two different conformations, as discussed in Sec- a)Electronic mail: [email protected] tion IV. A complimentary view of transporters is that of a pore 2 A “driving ion” substrate B outside inside outside inside Figure 1. Schematic transport cycle of A a symporter (transport of substrate and driving ion in the same direction) and B an antiporter (transport in opposite directions). The central cartoon summarizes the physiological function. The V-shaped triangle symbolizes a membrane- embedded transporter protein in the outward facing conformation in which its binding sites are accessible from the outside. The hat-shaped triangle indicates the inward facing conformation. The driving ion is drawn as a circle while the transported substrate is shown as a square. The predominant direction of reactions is shown by arrows, with horizontal arrows indicating binding/unbinding and vertical arrows conformational transitions. The order of binding and unbinding events and the stoichiometry of substrate to driving ions may differ from this cartoon. with multiple coupled gates; originally motivated by the de- pores are formed through the membrane. The alternating ac- scription of ion channels as pores with a single gate, this car- cess model with its two distinct states provides a conceptual toon model has proven valuable because transporters actually framework that avoids pore formation. However, it requires contain physical components that perform the functions of that a membrane protein is able to change between different gates, as will be shown with selected examples in Section V. conformations on the sub-millisecond time scale13, a speed When the alternating access/gated pore model is considered that is easily achievable for macromolecular conformational together with the cycle view of transport, a simple unified pic- changes14,15. The alternating access model also does not give ture emerges that describes symporters, antiporters, and uni- any insights into the actual molecular structure of a transporter porters as ideals in a spectrum of functionality (Section VI). except the general requirement that substrate and ion bind- ing sites must switch accessibility in different conformations. In order to obtain deeper mechanistic insights actual atomic- scale structures of transporters in multiple conformations are II. THE ALTERNATING ACCESS MODEL needed. The alternating access model in its basic form was de- The first secondary active transporter for which the major scribed by Jardetzky 11 as a polymer molecule that contains states in the transport cycle were resolved at atomic resolu- binding sites for substrate and is able to assume two differ- tion was the sodium-coupled symporter Mhp1, a member of ent conformations that alternatingly expose the binding sites the nucleobase-cation-symporter 1 (NCS1) family20,21. The to the interior and the exterior. The idea of a cyclical pro- structures of wild-type Mhp1 revealed a sodium binding and cess facilitated by a molecule that changes accessibility was a substrate binding site deep at the center of the transporter, expressed by Mitchell 1 in his “circulating carrier” model. To- roughly at the membrane midplane16. In one structure, these gether these models describe in abstract terms a basic frame- binding sites were accessible from the extracellular side, mak- work or model to understand driven transport across the cell ing this the outward facing (OF) conformation as shown in membrane. The key insight was that coupling of two fluxes Figure 2. Shimamura et al. 18 managed to crystallize wild- (substrate and driving ion) could be accomplished by bind- type Mhp1 in an inward facing (IF) conformation in which ing to different conformations of the same molecule as dis- the binding sites were exposed to the intracellular side. To- cussed in more detail in the next Section III. In particular, it gether they represent the two key conformations required by is physically not possible to move substrate against a gradient the alternating access model. A third
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transport of Sugars
    BI84CH32-Frommer ARI 29 April 2015 12:34 Transport of Sugars Li-Qing Chen,1,∗ Lily S. Cheung,1,∗ Liang Feng,3 Widmar Tanner,2 and Wolf B. Frommer1 1Department of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, California 94305; email: [email protected] 2Zellbiologie und Pflanzenbiochemie, Universitat¨ Regensburg, 93040 Regensburg, Germany 3Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305 Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2015. 84:865–94 Keywords First published online as a Review in Advance on glucose, sucrose, carrier, GLUT, SGLT, SWEET March 5, 2015 The Annual Review of Biochemistry is online at Abstract biochem.annualreviews.org Soluble sugars serve five main purposes in multicellular organisms: as sources This article’s doi: of carbon skeletons, osmolytes, signals, and transient energy storage and as 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-033904 transport molecules. Most sugars are derived from photosynthetic organ- Copyright c 2015 by Annual Reviews. isms, particularly plants. In multicellular organisms, some cells specialize All rights reserved in providing sugars to other cells (e.g., intestinal and liver cells in animals, ∗ These authors contributed equally to this review. photosynthetic cells in plants), whereas others depend completely on an ex- Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2015.84:865-894. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org ternal supply (e.g., brain cells, roots and seeds). This cellular exchange of Access provided by b-on: Universidade de Lisboa (UL) on 09/05/16. For personal use only. sugars requires transport proteins to mediate uptake or release from cells or subcellular compartments. Thus, not surprisingly, sugar transport is criti- cal for plants, animals, and humans.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Glucose Transporters in Renal Diseases Leszek Szablewski
    Szablewski Journal of Biomedical Science (2017) 24:64 DOI 10.1186/s12929-017-0371-7 REVIEW Open Access Distribution of glucose transporters in renal diseases Leszek Szablewski Abstract Kidneys play an important role in glucose homeostasis. Renal gluconeogenesis prevents hypoglycemia by releasing glucose into the blood stream. Glucose homeostasis is also due, in part, to reabsorption and excretion of hexose in the kidney. Lipid bilayer of plasma membrane is impermeable for glucose, which is hydrophilic and soluble in water. Therefore, transport of glucose across the plasma membrane depends on carrier proteins expressed in the plasma membrane. In humans, there are three families of glucose transporters: GLUT proteins, sodium-dependent glucose transporters (SGLTs) and SWEET. In kidney, only GLUTs and SGLTs protein are expressed. Mutations within genes that code these proteins lead to different renal disorders and diseases. However, diseases, not only renal, such as diabetes, may damage expression and function of renal glucose transporters. Keywords: Kidney, GLUT proteins, SGLT proteins, Diabetes, Familial renal glucosuria, Fanconi-Bickel syndrome, Renal cancers Background Because glucose is hydrophilic and soluble in water, lipid Maintenance of glucose homeostasis prevents pathological bilayer of plasma membrane is impermeable for it. There- consequences due to prolonged hyperglycemia or fore, transport of glucose into cells depends on carrier pro- hypoglycemia. Hyperglycemia leads to a high risk of vascu- teins that are present in the plasma membrane. In humans, lar complications, nephropathy, neuropathy and retinop- there are three families of glucose transporters: GLUT pro- athy. Hypoglycemia may damage the central nervous teins, encoded by SLC2 genes; sodium-dependent glucose system and lead to a higher risk of death.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Affinity Uniporter Carrier Proteins Can Increase Net Substrate Uptake
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Low afnity uniporter carrier proteins can increase net substrate uptake rate by reducing efux Received: 10 November 2017 Evert Bosdriesz 1,3, Meike T. Wortel 1,4, Jurgen R. Haanstra 1, Marijke J. Wagner1, Accepted: 9 March 2018 Pilar de la Torre Cortés2 & Bas Teusink 1 Published: xx xx xxxx Many organisms have several similar transporters with diferent afnities for the same substrate. Typically, high-afnity transporters are expressed when substrate is scarce and low-afnity ones when it is abundant. The beneft of using low instead of high-afnity transporters remains unclear, especially when additional nutrient sensors are present. Here, we investigate two hypotheses. It was previously hypothesized that there is a trade-of between the afnity and the catalytic efciency of transporters, and we fnd some but no defnitive support for it. Additionally, we propose that for uptake by facilitated difusion, at saturating substrate concentrations, lowering the afnity enhances the net uptake rate by reducing substrate efux. As a consequence, there exists an optimal, external-substrate- concentration dependent transporter afnity. A computational model of Saccharomyces cerevisiae glycolysis shows that using the low afnity HXT3 transporter instead of the high afnity HXT6 enhances the steady-state fux by 36%. We tried to test this hypothesis with yeast strains expressing a single glucose transporter modifed to have either a high or a low afnity. However, due to the intimate link between glucose perception and metabolism, direct experimental proof for this hypothesis remained inconclusive. Still, our theoretical results provide a novel reason for the presence of low-afnity transport systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Sodium-Coupled Secondary Transporters 11 Insights from Structure-Based Computations
    b1151_Chapter-11.qxd 5/5/2011 12:27 PM Page 199 b1151 Molecular Machines FA Sodium-coupled Secondary Transporters 11 Insights from Structure-based Computations Elia Zomot, Ahmet Bakan, Indira H. Shrivastava, Jason DeChancie, Timothy R. Lezon and Ivet Bahar 1. Introduction: Biological Function and Classification The biological membrane bilayer is impermeable to almost all polar or charged molecules. In order for the various solutes to cross this barrier, integral membrane proteins have evolved to provide a hydrophilic environment within the membrane that can bind and translocate these solutes into or out of the cell, often against their electrochemical gradient. These transporters are conventionally classified into three classes on the basis of the energy source used for transport: (1) primary active transporters rely on light, hydrolysis of ATP or redox reactions, (2) secondary active transporters require the electrochemical gradient of ions across the membrane to power the “uphill” transloca- tion of the substrate, and (3) precursor/product antiporters exchange one molecule with its metabolic product independent of another source of energy.1,2 A major family of secondary transporters involves sodium- (and less often proton-) depend- ent symporters that couple the energy-costly translocation of the solute into the cell to that of sodium down its electrochemical gradient. These sodium-coupled transporters are found in all species and participate in a myriad biological functions, e.g. maintenance of efficient neuro- transmission,3,4,5 absorption of nutrients in the intestine,6 regulation of pH and cytoplasmic [Na+]7,8 and osmoregulation9,10 are only some of their physiological functions. Of particular interest among sodium-coupled symporters are two families: the dicarboxylate/ amino-acid:cation symporters (DAACS) and the neurotransmitter sodium symporters (NSS).
    [Show full text]
  • Disease-Induced Modulation of Drug Transporters at the Blood–Brain Barrier Level
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Disease-Induced Modulation of Drug Transporters at the Blood–Brain Barrier Level Sweilem B. Al Rihani 1 , Lucy I. Darakjian 1, Malavika Deodhar 1 , Pamela Dow 1 , Jacques Turgeon 1,2 and Veronique Michaud 1,2,* 1 Tabula Rasa HealthCare, Precision Pharmacotherapy Research and Development Institute, Orlando, FL 32827, USA; [email protected] (S.B.A.R.); [email protected] (L.I.D.); [email protected] (M.D.); [email protected] (P.D.); [email protected] (J.T.) 2 Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-856-938-8697 Abstract: The blood–brain barrier (BBB) is a highly selective and restrictive semipermeable network of cells and blood vessel constituents. All components of the neurovascular unit give to the BBB its crucial and protective function, i.e., to regulate homeostasis in the central nervous system (CNS) by removing substances from the endothelial compartment and supplying the brain with nutrients and other endogenous compounds. Many transporters have been identified that play a role in maintaining BBB integrity and homeostasis. As such, the restrictive nature of the BBB provides an obstacle for drug delivery to the CNS. Nevertheless, according to their physicochemical or pharmacological properties, drugs may reach the CNS by passive diffusion or be subjected to putative influx and/or efflux through BBB membrane transporters, allowing or limiting their distribution to the CNS. Drug transporters functionally expressed on various compartments of the BBB involve numerous proteins from either the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) or the solute carrier (SLC) superfamilies.
    [Show full text]
  • Passive and Active Transport
    Passive and Active Transport 1. Thermodynamics of transport 2. Passive-mediated transport 3. Active transport neuron, membrane potential, ion transport Membranes • Provide barrier function – Extracellular – Organelles • Barrier can be overcome by „transport proteins“ – To mediate transmembrane movements of ions, Na+, K+ – Nutrients, glucose, amino acids etc. – Water (aquaporins) 1) Thermodynamics of Transport • Aout <-> Ain (ressembles a chemical equilibration) o‘ • GA - G A = RT ln [A] • ∆GA = GA(in) - GA(out) = RT ln ([A]in/[A]out) • GA: chemical potential of A o‘ • G A: chemical potential of standard state of A • If membrane has a potential, i.e., plasma membrane: -100mV (inside negative) then GA is termed the electrochemical potential of A Two types of transport across a membrane: o Nonmediated transport occurs by passive diffusion, i.e., O2, CO2 driven by chemical potential gradient, i.e. cannot occur against a concentration gradient o Mediated transport occurs by dedicated transport proteins 1. Passive-mediated transport/facilitated diffusion: [high] -> [low] 2. Active transport: [low] -> [high] May require energy in form of ATP or in form of a membrane potential 2) Passive-mediated transport Substances that are too large or too polar to diffuse across the bilayer must be transported by proteins: carriers, permeases, channels and transporters A) Ionophores B) Porins C) Ion Channels D) Aquaporins E) Transport Proteins A) Ionophores Organic molecules of divers types, often of bacterial origin => Increase the permeability of a target membrane for ions, frequently antibiotic, result in collapse of target membrane potential by ion equilibration 1. Carrier Ionophore, make ion soluble in membrane, i.e. valinomycin, 104 K+/sec 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanisms of Radiopharmaceutical Localization
    .::VOLUME 16, LESSON 4::. Mechanisms of Radiopharmaceutical Localization Continuing Education for Nuclear Pharmacists And Nuclear Medicine Professionals By James A. Ponto, MS, RPh, BCNP Chief Nuclear Pharmacists, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics and Professor (Clinical), University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics The University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, College of Pharmacy is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education as a provider of continuing pharmacy education. Program No. 0039-000-12-164- H04-P 2.5 Contact Hours or .25 CEUs. Initial release date: 7/19/2012 -- Intentionally left blank -- Mechanisms of Radiopharmaceutical Localization By James A. Ponto, MS, RPh, BCNP Editor, CENP Jeffrey Norenberg, MS, PharmD, BCNP, FASHP, FAPhA UNM College of Pharmacy Editorial Board Stephen Dragotakes, RPh, BCNP, FAPhA Michael Mosley, RPh, BCNP Neil Petry, RPh, MS, BCNP, FAPhA James Ponto, MS, RPh, BCNP, FAPhA Tim Quinton, PharmD, BCNP, FAPhA S. Duann Vanderslice, RPh, BCNP, FAPhA John Yuen, PharmD, BCNP Advisory Board Dave Engstrom, PharmD, BCNP Vivian Loveless, PharmD, BCNP, FAPhA Brigette Nelson, MS, PharmD, BCNP Brantley Strickland, BCNP Susan Lardner, BCNP Christine Brown, BCNP Director, CENP Administrator, CE & Web Publisher Kristina Wittstrom, MS, RPh, BCNP, FAPhA Christina Muñoz, M.A. UNM College of Pharmacy UNM College of Pharmacy While the advice and information in this publication are believed to be true and accurate at the time of press, the author(s), editors, or the publisher cannot accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Crystal Structure of a Glucose/H Symporter and Its Mechanism of Action
    + Crystal structure of a glucose/H symporter and its mechanism of action Cristina V. Iancua, Jamillah Zamoonb, Sang Bum Wooa, Alexander Aleshinc, and Jun-yong Choea,1 aDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, The Chicago Medical School, North Chicago,IL 60064; bDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Kuwait University, Kuwait City 13060, Kuwait; and cDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Sanford Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037 Edited* by H. Ronald Kaback, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, and approved September 26, 2013 (received for review June 25, 2013) + Glucose transporters are required to bring glucose into cells, of a Staphylococcus epidermidis glucose/H symporter (GlcPSe) where it is an essential energy source and precursor in protein by single anomalous dispersion methods. GlcPSe shares high se- and lipid synthesis. These transporters are involved in important quence identity (27–34%) and homology (49–58%) with the hu- common diseases such as cancer and diabetes. Here, we report the man GLUTs (Table S1), is highly specific for glucose, and is + crystal structure of the Staphylococcus epidermidis glucose/H sym- inhibited by the well-characterized inhibitors of human GLUTs porter in an inward-facing conformation at 3.2-Å resolution. The phloretin, cytochalasin B, and forskolin. In contrast to GlcP , + Se Staphylococcus epidermidis glucose/H symporter is homologous XylE transports xylose but not glucose, which is an inhibitor, and is to human glucose transporters, is very specific and has high avidity impervious to inhibition by cytochalasin B (13, 24). On the basis of for glucose, and is inhibited by the human glucose transport inhib- the GlcPSe structure and functional studies of wild-type and mu- itors cytochalasin B, phloretin, and forskolin.
    [Show full text]
  • Membrane Transport Quiz
    Membrane Transport Quiz 1. Which of the following is an example of extracellular fluid? a. Cytosol b. Plasma c. Interstitial Fluid d. Both b and c 2. Which of the following correctly describes passive transport? a. the cell uses ATP in passive transport b. most pumps are examples of passive transport c. diffusion is an example of passive transport d. exocytosis is an example of passive transport 3. Simple diffusion occurs ______________. a. with transporters in the cell membrane b. directly across the cell membrane c. through exocytosis d. through endocytosis 4. Which of the following is an example of active transport? a. Filtration b. Osmosis c. Endocytosis d. Exocytosis e. Both c and d 5. Which type of active transport uses ATP directly? a. Primary Active Transport b. Secondary Active Transport c. Both a and b 6. Which of the following is an example of receptor mediated endocytosis? a. Phagocytosis b. Primary Active Transport c. Exocytosis d. ALL are For use with TCC iTunes University Membrane Transport Lecture. 1 Developed by: Martha Kutter 2009 for the Learning Commons at Tallahassee Community College. 7. A transporter that moves one type of particle in one direction is _______________. a. Uniporter b. Symporter c. Antiporter 8. A transporter the moves two different particles in two different directions is ________. a. Endocytosis b. Exocytosis c. Uniporter d. Symporter e. Antiporter 9. Which of the following is an example of a primary active transporter? a. Na+/Ca2+ transporter on cardiac contractile cells b. Na+ channels on neurons c. Na+/K+ ATPase on all cells d.
    [Show full text]
  • Plasma Membrane Sandwich Model Unit Membrane
    Plasma Membrane Sandwich Model Unit Membrane FLUID MOSAIC MODEL FLUID- because individual phospholipids and proteins can move side-to-side within the layer, like it’s a liquid. MOSAIC- because of the pattern produced by the scattered protein molecules when the membrane is viewed from above. 5 Functions • Protection and support – Maintains cell shape and size Solubility • Materials that are soluble in lipids can pass through the cell membrane easily 7 Selective Permeablility • Small molecules Ions, hydrophilic and larger molecules larger than hydrophobic water, and large molecules move molecules such as through easily. proteins do not move through the • e.g. O2, CO2, H2O membrane on their own. DIFFUSION Diffusion is a PASSIVE process which means no energy is used to make the molecules move, they have a natural KINETIC ENERGY 9 Passive Transport Simple Diffusion ❖ Doesn’t require energy ❖ Moves high to low concentration ❖ Example: Oxygen or water diffusing into a cell and carbon dioxide diffusing out. 10 Diffusion through a Membrane Cell membrane Solute moves DOWN concentration gradient (HIGH to LOW) 11 Osmosis • Diffusion of water Diffusion across a membrane across a membrane • Moves from HIGH water potential (low Semipermeable solute) to LOW water membrane potential (high solute) 12 Diffusion of H2O Across A Membrane High H O potential 2 Low H2O potential Low solute concentration High solute concentration 13 Passive Transport Facilitated diffusion ❖Doesn’t require energy ❖Uses transport proteins to move high to low concentration Examples: Glucose or amino acids moving from blood into a cell. 14 Types of Transport Proteins • Channel proteins are embedded in the cell membrane & have a pore for materials to cross • Carrier proteins can change shape to move material from one side of the membrane to the other 15 Facilitated Diffusion Molecules will randomly move through the pores in Channel Proteins.
    [Show full text]
  • Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins
    1/11/2018 King Saud University College of Science Department of Biochemistry Biomembranes and Cell Signaling (BCH 452) Chapter 3 Diffusion, Channels and Transport Systems Prepared by Dr. Farid Ataya http://fac.ksu.edu.sa/fataya Lect Topics to be covered No. Role of cell surface carbohydrates in recognise ion, as receptor of antigens, 7 hormones, toxins, viruses and bacteria. Their role in histocompatibility and cell-cell adhesion. Diffusion. 8 Diffusion across biomembranes. Ficks law. Structural types of channels (pores): -type, -barrel, pore forming toxins, ionophores. Functional types of channels (pores): voltage-gated channels e.g. sodium channels, ligand-gated channels e.g. acetylcholine receptor (nicotinic-acetylcholine channel), c-AMP regulated. Gap junctions and nuclear pores. 9 Transport systems: Energetics of transport systems, G calculation in each type. Passive Transport (facilitated diffusion). 1 1/11/2018 No. Topics to be covered Lect Kinetic properties. 9 Passive transport: Glucose transporters (GLUT 1 to5), - C1 , HCO3 exchanger (anion exchanger protein) in erythrocyte membrane Kinetic properties. 10 Active transport: Types of active transport: Primary ATPases (Primary active transporters): P transporters (e.g. Na+, K+, ATPase) First assessment Exam ATP binding cassettes (ABC transports) 11 (e.g. cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator-chloride transport). Multidrug resistance protein transporter. V transporters, F transporters. Secondary active transporters (e.g. Na+ -dependent transport of glucose and amino acids). To be covered under intestinal brush border Transport of large molecules (Macromolecules) 12 Types: Exocytosis, Endocytosis-pinocytosis and phagocytosis Types of pinocytosis: Absorptive pinocytosis, characteristics and examples. Fluid phase pinocytosis, characteristics and examples The role of cell surface carbohydrates: Glycoproteins Membrane glycoproteins are proteins that contain 1-30% carbohydrate in their structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitochondria Regulate the Ca2+–Exocytosis Relationship of Bovine Adrenal Chromaffin Cells
    The Journal of Neuroscience, November 1, 1999, 19(21):9261–9270 Mitochondria Regulate the Ca21–Exocytosis Relationship of Bovine Adrenal Chromaffin Cells David R. Giovannucci,1 Michael D. Hlubek,2 and Edward L. Stuenkel1 Departments of 1Physiology and 2Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0622 The present study expands the contemporary view of mito- entered via voltage-activated Ca 21 channels. Disruption of chondria as important participants in cellular Ca 21 dynamics cellular Ca 21 homeostasis by poisoning mitochondria en- and provides evidence that mitochondria regulate the supply of hanced the secretory responsiveness of chromaffin cells by release-competent secretory granules. Using pharmacological increasing the amplitude of the transient rise and the time 21 D 21 probes to inhibit mitochondrial Ca import, the ability of mi- course of recovery to baseline of the evoked [Ca ]c. The tochondria to modulate secretory activity in single, patch- enhancement of the secretory response was represented by clamped bovine chromaffin cells was examined by simulta- significant deviation of the Ca 21–exocytosis relationship from a 21 D neously monitoring rapid changes in membrane surface area standard relationship that equates Ca influx and Cm. Thus, D 21 21 ( Cm ) and cytosolic Ca levels ([Ca ]c ). Repetitive step mitochondria would play a critical role in the control of secre- depolarizations or action potential waveforms were found to tory activity in chromaffin cells that undergo tonic or repetitive 21 m 21 raise the [Ca ]c of chromaffin cells into the 1 M to tens of depolarizing activity, likely by limiting the Ca -dependent ac- micromolar range.
    [Show full text]