General Principles of Secondary Active Transporter Function Oliver Beckstein1, a) and Fiona Naughton1 Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe AZ 85287, USA (Dated: February 19, 2021) Transport of ions and small molecules across the cell membrane against electrochemical gradients is catalyzed by integral membrane proteins that use a source of free energy to drive the energetically uphill flux of the transported substrate. Secondary active transporters couple the spontaneous influx of a “driving” ion such as Na+ or H+ to the flux of the substrate. The thermodynamics of such cyclical non-equilibrium systems are well understood and recent work has focused on the molecular mechanism of secondary active transport. The fact that these transporters change their conformation between an inward-facing and outward-facing conformation in a cyclical fashion, called the alternating access model, is broadly recognized as the molecular framework in which to describe transporter function. However, only with the advent of high resolution crystal structures and detailed computer simulations has it become possible to recognize common molecular-level principles between disparate transporter families. Inverted repeat symmetry in secondary active transporters has shed light on how protein structures can encode a bi-stable two-state system. More detailed analysis (based on experimental structural data and detailed molecular dynamics simulations) indicates that transporters can be understood as gated pores with at least two coupled gates. These gates are not just a convenient cartoon element to illustrate a putative mechanism but map to distinct parts of the transporter protein. Enumerating all distinct gate states naturally includes occluded states in the alternating access picture and also suggests what kind of protein conformations might be observable. By connecting the possible conformational states and ion/substrate bound states in a kinetic model, a unified picture emerges in which symporter, antiporter, and uniporter function are extremes in a continuum of functionality. Keywords: membrane protein, transporter, symmetry, molec- during one leg of the cycle while the substrate is bound in the ular mechanisms. other leg and is transported in the opposite direction. Variations of the above scheme are common, though. For instance, many symporters transport another ion back instead I. INTRODUCTION of the apo leg of the transport cycle. Sometimes, the driv- ing ion is effectively part of the substrate as in the AdiC Active transporters are integral membrane proteins that transporter10, which exchanges L-arginine with its decarboxy- move substrate through the membrane against an electro- lated product agmatine to effectively export protons. chemical gradient by using a source of free energy. They A third class of related transporters consists of non-coupled are broadly classified as primary and secondary active trans- transporters. These uniporters facilitate diffusion through the porters, depending on the free energy source1. Primary ac- membrane. Although we specifically focus on active trans- tive transporters harness chemical reactions (e.g., phospho- porters, the discussion on transport cycles (Section VI) will rylation by ATP) or light. Some examples are the sodium- make clear that the uniporters are closely related to active 2 potassium pump (Na/K ATPase) , the rotary F0F1-ATPase and transporters and it is plausible that small changes in the pro- the light-driven proton pump bacteriorhodopsin3, complex I in tein may convert between the two. the respiratory chain4, or ATP-driven ABC transporters such In this review we focus on overarching principles that as p-glycoprotein5. are common across almost all secondary active transporters. Secondary transport is driven by an electrochemical gra- We begin with the alternating access model which provides dient in a driving ion, namely sodium or protons. Exam- the “standard model” for explaining transporter function in ples are neurotransmitter transporters SERT (serotonin) and a structural context (Section II). Although evolution always DAT (dopamine)6, sodium-proton exchangers (NHE)7, the arXiv:1912.06275v2 [q-bio.BM] 18 Feb 2021 finds ways to add a few exceptions to common rules (for in- calcium exchanger8, and AE1, the anion exchanger in red stance, there are a few transporters that do not appear to follow blood cells also known as Band 39). Secondary active trans- the classical alternating access model), the physical principles porters can be divided into two classes based on their physio- under which transporters operate are not negotiable. Trans- logical behavior1. Symporters move their substrate in parallel porters function out of equilibrium as “physical enzymes” that with the driving ion (Figure 1A). Both driving ion and sub- catalyze transport by free energy transduction through cyclic strate are bound at the same time and move in the same di- processes (Section III). Ten years ago, a remarkable insight rection. One part of the transport cycle consists of the move- was found into the evolutionary mechanism that can gener- ment of the substrate- and ion-free (apo) transporter. In the an- ate protein structures that can switch between the two states tiporter transport cycle (Figure 1B), the driving ion is bound of the alternating access model: transporters contain so-called inverted repeat sequences that fold into structures with an in- ternal pseudo two-fold symmetry. This symmetry is broken to generate two different conformations, as discussed in Sec- a)Electronic mail: [email protected] tion IV. A complimentary view of transporters is that of a pore 2 A “driving ion” substrate B outside inside outside inside Figure 1. Schematic transport cycle of A a symporter (transport of substrate and driving ion in the same direction) and B an antiporter (transport in opposite directions). The central cartoon summarizes the physiological function. The V-shaped triangle symbolizes a membrane- embedded transporter protein in the outward facing conformation in which its binding sites are accessible from the outside. The hat-shaped triangle indicates the inward facing conformation. The driving ion is drawn as a circle while the transported substrate is shown as a square. The predominant direction of reactions is shown by arrows, with horizontal arrows indicating binding/unbinding and vertical arrows conformational transitions. The order of binding and unbinding events and the stoichiometry of substrate to driving ions may differ from this cartoon. with multiple coupled gates; originally motivated by the de- pores are formed through the membrane. The alternating ac- scription of ion channels as pores with a single gate, this car- cess model with its two distinct states provides a conceptual toon model has proven valuable because transporters actually framework that avoids pore formation. However, it requires contain physical components that perform the functions of that a membrane protein is able to change between different gates, as will be shown with selected examples in Section V. conformations on the sub-millisecond time scale13, a speed When the alternating access/gated pore model is considered that is easily achievable for macromolecular conformational together with the cycle view of transport, a simple unified pic- changes14,15. The alternating access model also does not give ture emerges that describes symporters, antiporters, and uni- any insights into the actual molecular structure of a transporter porters as ideals in a spectrum of functionality (Section VI). except the general requirement that substrate and ion bind- ing sites must switch accessibility in different conformations. In order to obtain deeper mechanistic insights actual atomic- scale structures of transporters in multiple conformations are II. THE ALTERNATING ACCESS MODEL needed. The alternating access model in its basic form was de- The first secondary active transporter for which the major scribed by Jardetzky 11 as a polymer molecule that contains states in the transport cycle were resolved at atomic resolu- binding sites for substrate and is able to assume two differ- tion was the sodium-coupled symporter Mhp1, a member of ent conformations that alternatingly expose the binding sites the nucleobase-cation-symporter 1 (NCS1) family20,21. The to the interior and the exterior. The idea of a cyclical pro- structures of wild-type Mhp1 revealed a sodium binding and cess facilitated by a molecule that changes accessibility was a substrate binding site deep at the center of the transporter, expressed by Mitchell 1 in his “circulating carrier” model. To- roughly at the membrane midplane16. In one structure, these gether these models describe in abstract terms a basic frame- binding sites were accessible from the extracellular side, mak- work or model to understand driven transport across the cell ing this the outward facing (OF) conformation as shown in membrane. The key insight was that coupling of two fluxes Figure 2. Shimamura et al. 18 managed to crystallize wild- (substrate and driving ion) could be accomplished by bind- type Mhp1 in an inward facing (IF) conformation in which ing to different conformations of the same molecule as dis- the binding sites were exposed to the intracellular side. To- cussed in more detail in the next Section III. In particular, it gether they represent the two key conformations required by is physically not possible to move substrate against a gradient the alternating access model. A third