Exact Non-Markovian Master Equations for Multiple Qubit Systems: Quantum-Trajectory Approach

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

PHYSICAL REVIEW A 90, 052104 (2014) Exact non-Markovian master equations for multiple qubit systems: Quantum-trajectory approach Yusui Chen,1,* J. Q. You,2,† and Ting Yu1,‡ 1Center for Controlled Quantum Systems and the Department of Physics and Engineering Physics, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey 07030, USA 2Laboratory for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information, Beijing Computational Science Research Center, Beijing 100084, China (Received 27 March 2014; published 5 November 2014) A wide class of exact master equations for a multiple qubit system can be explicitly constructed by using the corresponding exact non-Markovian quantum-state diffusion equations. These exact master equations arise naturally from the quantum decoherence dynamics of qubit system as a quantum memory coupled to a collective colored noisy source. The exact master equations are also important in optimal quantum control, quantum dissipation, and quantum thermodynamics. In this paper, we show that the exact non-Markovian master equation for a dissipative N-qubit system can be derived explicitly from the statistical average of the corresponding non-Markovian quantum trajectories. We illustrated our general formulation by an explicit construction of a three-qubit system coupled to a non-Markovian bosonic environment. This multiple qubit master equation offers an accurate time evolution of quantum systems in various domains, and paves the way to investigate the memory effect of an open system in a non-Markovian regime without any approximation. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.90.052104 PACS number(s): 03.65.Yz, 03.67.Bg, 03.65.Ud, 32.90.+a I. INTRODUCTION a non-Markovian environment has been studied extensively by employing an exact or an approximate non-Markovian A quantum open system, its temporal evolution governed master equation, which has many experimental applications by a master equation or a stochastic Schrodinger¨ equation, has in quantum device, quantum information, and quantum op- attracted widespread interest due to its applications in various tics [21–25]. research fields such as nonequilibrium quantum dynamics, The exact master equations provide a fundamental de- quantum control, quantum cooling, quantum decoherence, scription to non-Markovian quantum open systems. Even and quantum dissipation [1–12]. The quantum dynamics of if the exact stochastic Schrodinger¨ equation is known, it an open system is commonly formulated in the system plus is still highly desirable to derive the corresponding master environment framework where the state of the open system is equation due to its conceptual importance in understanding described by a reduced density operator. Typically, deriving quantum decoherence and quantum-classical transition as well the master equation governing the reduced density operator as its wide applications in quantum optics, condensed matter involves several important elements regarding fine details of physics, and quantum information processing [1,12]. the environment and the coupling between the system and In the case of a non-Markovian open system, deriving environment. In the conventional quantum optics where the a non-Markovian master equation is a notoriously difficult quantized radiation field is treated as an environment, the problem due to the lack of a systematic tool that is applicable master equation for an atomic system weakly coupled to to a generic open quantum system irrespective of the system- the radiation field is systematically derived, which applies the environment coupling strength and the environment frequency Markov approximation and takes the standard Lindblad form distribution [26,27]. For a quantum system coupled to a (setting = 1) [13] bosonic or fermionic bath, a systematic method is formulated =− + † − † − † called non-Markovian quantum-state-diffusion method (QSD) ρ˙ i[Hs,ρ] (2Li ρLi Li Li ρ ρLi Li ). (1) i or stochastic Schrodinger¨ equation approach [28–30]. In the non-Markovian QSD method, the quantum dynamics Here, Hs is the Hamiltonian of the system of interest, and Li represented by a stochastic differential equation is driven by are a set of system operators called Lindblad operators which ∗ a Gaussian type of process zt . By construction, applying couple the system to the environment. the ensemble average on all possible stochastic processes, An environment can bring about various physical phenom- one can get the reduced density matrix of the interested ena to the open quantum system [12,14]. For example, in system. For many models, such as multilevel atom and mul- the case of two-qubit system coupled to two local bosonic tiple qubit system, the exact non-Markovian dynamics have baths, a Markov environment typically induces both irre- been numerically studied by using the non-Markovian QSD versible decoherence and disentanglement [15,16]. However, approach [31–36]. the non-Markovian environment with a finite memory time can It is known that the Markov master equation for the open assist in regenerating quantum coherence and entanglement system may be derived from the corresponding stochastic in the system [17–20]. Some interesting physics induced by unrevealing [14,37–39]. There are also some examples in the non-Markovian case where the exact master equation can be recovered from the non-Markovian QSD equation, *[email protected] but we need to point out that these works are derived in †[email protected] special conditions, such as the single-spin system [31,33,36] ‡[email protected] or quantum Brownian motion [40,41]. For a multiple qubit 1050-2947/2014/90(5)/052104(6) 052104-1 ©2014 American Physical Society YUSUI CHEN, J. Q. YOU, AND TING YU PHYSICAL REVIEW A 90, 052104 (2014) system, deriving the exact master equations from the stochastic A. Non-Markovian QSD equation Schrodinger¨ equation is still an open problem. Unlike creating The non-Markovian diffusive stochastic Schrodinger¨ equa- thousands of trajectories to recover the reduced density matrix tion is given by [29] in the QSD approach, the exact master equation can be solved ∗ ∗ ∗ ∂t ψt (z ) = (−iHs + Lz )ψt (z ) deterministically, so that it can significantly improve the nu- t merical efficiency. More importantly, the exact master equation t − † δ ∗ may allow an analytical solution of non-Markovian dynamics. L dsα(t,s) ∗ ψt (z ), (3) 0 δzs Such kinds of analytical evaluations give rise to useful infor- ∗ where ψt (z ) is the pure stochastic wave function of the mation about quantum dissipation and decoherence in the non- ∗ ∗ =− iωk t three-qubit system, and zt i k gkzk e is the complex Markovian regime. In this paper, we present a generic exact M ∗ = Gaussian stochastic process with zero mean [zt ] 0, master equation for a multiple qubit dissipative system coupled ∗ ∗ ∗ and correlations M[z z ] = 0 and M[z z ] = α(t,s). Note to a non-Markovian bosonic bath. The methodology used in t s t s that α(t,s) is the correlation function of the bath, which this paper can also be extended to a multilevel atomic system determines environment memory time and dictates the tran- coupled to a quantized radiation field [42]. Our exact master sition from non-Markovian to Markov regimes. The symbol equation provides a systematic tool in dealing with quantum 2 2 M[...] = d z e−|z| ... means ensemble average operation coherence and optimal quantum control in a non-Markovian π ∗ regime [43,44]. on all stochastic trajectories zt . Our paper is organized as follows. In Sec. II, we introduce The stochastic Schrodinger¨ equation (3) can be transformed into a time-local form when the functional derivative of noise a three-qubit system and show the principle idea and the detail ∗ ∗ δ ∗ is replaced by an operator O(t,s,z )ψt (z ) = ∗ ψt (z ) acting of analytical derivation of exact master equation for the three- δzs qubit system. In Sec. III, we show some numerical simulation on the system’s current state. In the Markov limit O operator must be the same as Lindblad operator L, therefore, the results by applying the new master equation approach. In ∗ Sec. IV, we start a general discussion on the derivation of consistent initial condition for O operator is O(t,t,z ) = L.By ∂ δ δ ∂ the consistency condition ∗ ψt = ∗ ψt ,theO operator the master equation for the N-qubit system. ∂t δzs δzs ∂t satisfies the following time-evolution equation ∗ = − + ∗ − † ¯ ∗ ∗ ∂t O(t,s,z ) [ iHs Lzt L O(t,z ),O(t,s,z )] II. EXACT NON-MARKOVIAN MASTER EQUATION δO¯ (t,z∗) − L† , (4) An N-qubit system representing a carrier of quantum δz∗ s information or memory is assumed to be coupled to one ¯ ∗ = t ∗ where O(t,z ) 0 dsα(t,s)O(t,s,z ). or more dissipative environments described by a set of For the three-qubit system with dissipative coupling, the harmonic oscillators. To be specific, now we consider a functional expansion of the O operator contains at most the three-qubit model to illustrate our method of deriving the exact two-fold noises [36] master equation from the non-Markovian QSD equation for a t multiple qubit system. A more generic N-qubit model can O(t,s,z∗) = O (t,s) + ds z∗ O (t,s,s ) 0 1 s1 1 1 be treated in a similar way. The total Hamiltonian for our 0 three-qubit system coupled to a bosonic bath may be written t + ds ds z∗ z∗ O (t,s,s ,s ), (5) as [8] 1 2 s1 s2 2 1 2 0 where O0(t,s),O1(t,s,s1),O2(t,s,s1,s2) are three 8 × 8ma- Htot = Hs + Hint + Hb, trices not containing any noise. One can get the evolution equations for O by plugging the solution (5) into Eq. (4) 3 2 i ωj j x x y y ∗ Hs = σ + Jxy σ σ + + σ σ + , δO¯ (t,z ) 2 z j j 1 j j 1 [−iH + Lz∗ − L†O¯ (t,z∗),O(t,s,z∗)] − L† j=1 j=1 s t δz∗ (2) s = † + † t Hint L gkbk L gkbk, = + ∗ ∂t O0(t,s) ∂t ds1zs O1(t,s,s1) k k 1 0 † t H = ω b b , ∗ ∗ b k k k + ∂ ds ds z z O (t,s,s ,s ).
Recommended publications
  • A Lindblad Model of Quantum Brownian Motion

    A Lindblad Model of Quantum Brownian Motion

    A Lindblad model of quantum Brownian motion Aniello Lampo,1, ∗ Soon Hoe Lim,2 Jan Wehr,2 Pietro Massignan,1 and Maciej Lewenstein1, 3 1ICFO { Institut de Ciencies Fotoniques, The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, 08860 Castelldefels (Barcelona), Spain 2Department of Mathematics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0089, USA 3ICREA { Instituci´oCatalana de Recerca i Estudis Avan¸cats, Lluis Companys 23, E-08010 Barcelona, Spain (Dated: December 16, 2016) The theory of quantum Brownian motion describes the properties of a large class of open quantum systems. Nonetheless, its description in terms of a Born-Markov master equation, widely used in literature, is known to violate the positivity of the density operator at very low temperatures. We study an extension of existing models, leading to an equation in the Lindblad form, which is free of this problem. We study the dynamics of the model, including the detailed properties of its stationary solution, for both constant and position-dependent coupling of the Brownian particle to the bath, focusing in particular on the correlations and the squeezing of the probability distribution induced by the environment. PACS numbers: 05.40.-a,03.65.Yz,72.70.+m,03.75.Gg I. INTRODUCTION default choice for evaluating decoherence and dissipation processes, and in general it provides a way to treat quan- A physical system interacting with the environment is titatively the effects experienced by an open system due referred to as open [1]. In reality, such an interaction to the interaction with the environment [27{30]. Here- is unavoidable, so every physical system is affected by after, we will refer to the central particle studied in the the presence of its surroundings, leading to dissipation, model as the Brownian particle.
  • Quantum Dissipation and Decoherence of Collective Telefon 08 21/598-32 34 Prof

    Quantum Dissipation and Decoherence of Collective Telefon 08 21/598-32 34 Prof

    N§ MAI %NRAISONDU -OBILITÏ DÏMÏNAGEMENT E DU3ERVICEDELA RENCONTREDÏTUDIANTS !UPROGRAMMERENCONTREDÏTU TAIRE ÌL5,0!JOUTERÌ COMMUNICATION DIANTSETDENSEIGNANTS CHERCHEURS LACOMPÏTENCEDISCIPLINAIREETLIN ETDENSEIGNANTS LEPROCHAIN CHERCHEURSDANSLE VISITEDUCAMPUS INFORMATIONSSUR GUISTIQUE UNE EXPÏRIENCE BINATIO LES ÏCHANGES %RASMUS3OCRATES NALEETBICULTURELLE TELESTLOBJECTIF BULLETIN DOMAINEDESSCIENCESDE ENTRELES&ACULTÏSDEBIOLOGIEDES DECETTECOLLABORATIONNOVATRICEEN DINFORMATIONS LAVIE5,0 5NIVERSITËT DEUX UNIVERSITÏS PRÏSENTATION DE BIOLOGIEBIOCHIMIE PARAÔTRA DES3AARLANDES PROJETS DE RECHERCHE EN PHARMA LEMAI COLOGIE VIROLOGIE IMMUNOLOGIE ET #ONTACTS 5NE PREMIÒRE RENCONTRE AVAIT EU GÏNÏTIQUEHUMAINEDU:(-" &ACULTÏDESSCIENCESDELAVIE LIEU Ì 3AARBRàCKEN EN MAI $R*OERN0àTZ #ETTERENCONTRE ORGANISÏEÌLINI JPUETZ IBMCU STRASBGFR SUIVIEENFÏVRIERPARLAVENUE TIATIVEDU$R*0àTZETDU#ENTRE #ENTREDELANGUES)," Ì 3TRASBOURG DUN GROUPE DÏTU DELANGUESDEL)NSTITUT,E"ELCÙTÏ #ATHERINE#HOUISSA DIANTS ET DENSEIGNANTS DE LUNI STRASBOURGEOIS DU 0R - 3CHMITT BUREAU( VERSITÏ DE LA 3ARRE ,A E ÏDITION CÙTÏ SARROIS SINSCRIT DANS LE CATHERINECHOUISSA LABLANG ULPU STRASBGFR LE MAI PERMETTRA CETTE CADREDESÏCHANGESENTRELESDEUX FOISAUXSTRASBOURGEOISDEDÏCOU FACULTÏS VISANT Ì LA MISE SUR PIED ;SOMMAIRE VRIR LES LABORATOIRES DU :ENTRUM DUN CURSUS FRANCO ALLEMAND EN FàR(UMANUND-OLEKULARBIOLOGIE 3CIENCES DE LA VIE 5NE ÏTUDIANTE !CTUALITÏS :(-" DEL5NIVERSITÏDELA3ARRE DE L5,0 TERMINE ACTUELLEMENT SA IMPLANTÏS SUR LE SITE DU #(5 DE LICENCE, ÌL5D3 DEUXÏTUDIANTS /RGANISATION 3AARBRàCKEN
  • Arxiv:Quant-Ph/0208026V1 5 Aug 2002

    Arxiv:Quant-Ph/0208026V1 5 Aug 2002

    Path Integrals and Their Application to Dissipative Quantum Systems Gert-Ludwig Ingold Institut f¨ur Physik, Universit¨at Augsburg, D-86135 Augsburg arXiv:quant-ph/0208026v1 5 Aug 2002 to be published in “Coherent Evolution in Noisy Environments”, Lecture Notes in Physics, http://link.springer.de/series/lnpp/ c Springer Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York Path Integrals and Their Application to Dissipative Quantum Systems Gert-Ludwig Ingold Institut f¨ur Physik, Universit¨at Augsburg, D-86135 Augsburg, Germany 1 Introduction The coupling of a system to its environment is a recurrent subject in this collec- tion of lecture notes. The consequences of such a coupling are threefold. First of all, energy may irreversibly be transferred from the system to the environment thereby giving rise to the phenomenon of dissipation. In addition, the fluctuating force exerted by the environment on the system causes fluctuations of the system degree of freedom which manifest itself for example as Brownian motion. While these two effects occur both for classical as well as quantum systems, there exists a third phenomenon which is specific to the quantum world. As a consequence of the entanglement between system and environmental degrees of freedom a coherent superposition of quantum states may be destroyed in a process referred to as decoherence. This effect is of major concern if one wants to implement a quantum computer. Therefore, decoherence is discussed in detail in Chap. 5. Quantum computation, however, is by no means the only topic where the coupling to an environment is relevant. In fact, virtually no real system can be considered as completely isolated from its surroundings.
  • Chapter 3 Feynman Path Integral

    Chapter 3 Feynman Path Integral

    Chapter 3 Feynman Path Integral The aim of this chapter is to introduce the concept of the Feynman path integral. As well as developing the general construction scheme, particular emphasis is placed on establishing the interconnections between the quantum mechanical path integral, classical Hamiltonian mechanics and classical statistical mechanics. The practice of path integration is discussed in the context of several pedagogical applications: As well as the canonical examples of a quantum particle in a single and double potential well, we discuss the generalisation of the path integral scheme to tunneling of extended objects (quantum fields), dissipative and thermally assisted quantum tunneling, and the quantum mechanical spin. In this chapter we will temporarily leave the arena of many–body physics and second quantisation and, at least superficially, return to single–particle quantum mechanics. By establishing the path integral approach for ordinary quantum mechanics, we will set the stage for the introduction of functional field integral methods for many–body theories explored in the next chapter. We will see that the path integral not only represents a gateway to higher dimensional functional integral methods but, when viewed from an appropriate perspective, already represents a field theoretical approach in its own right. Exploiting this connection, various techniques and concepts of field theory, viz. stationary phase analyses of functional integrals, the Euclidean formulation of field theory, instanton techniques, and the role of topological concepts in field theory will be motivated and introduced in this chapter. 3.1 The Path Integral: General Formalism Broadly speaking, there are two basic approaches to the formulation of quantum mechan- ics: the ‘operator approach’ based on the canonical quantisation of physical observables Concepts in Theoretical Physics 64 CHAPTER 3.
  • Nonequilibrium Fluctuation-Dissipation Inequality and Nonequilibrium

    Nonequilibrium Fluctuation-Dissipation Inequality and Nonequilibrium

    PHYSICAL REVIEW E 88, 012102 (2013) Nonequilibrium fluctuation-dissipation inequality and nonequilibrium uncertainty principle C. H. Fleming and B. L. Hu Joint Quantum Institute and Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA Albert Roura Max-Planck-Institut fur¨ Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut), Am Muhlenberg¨ 1, 14476 Golm, Germany (Received 16 January 2013; revised manuscript received 7 May 2013; published 3 July 2013) The fluctuation-dissipation relation is usually formulated for a system interacting with a heat bath at finite temperature, and often in the context of linear response theory, where only small deviations from the mean are considered. We show that for an open quantum system interacting with a nonequilibrium environment, where temperature is no longer a valid notion, a fluctuation-dissipation inequality exists. Instead of being proportional, quantum fluctuations are bounded below by quantum dissipation, whereas classically the fluctuations vanish at zero temperature. The lower bound of this inequality is exactly satisfied by (zero-temperature) quantum noise and is in accord with the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, in both its microscopic origins and its influence upon systems. Moreover, it is shown that there is a coupling-dependent nonequilibrium fluctuation-dissipation relation that determines the nonequilibrium uncertainty relation of linear systems in the weak-damping limit. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.88.012102 PACS number(s): 05.30.−d, 03.65.Yz, 05.40.−a I. INTRODUCTION instantaneous, but where there is nonlocal damping: The fluctuation-dissipation relation (FDR) is a fundamental t m x¨(t) + 2 dτ γ(t − τ) x˙(τ) − F (x) = ξ(t), (4) relation in nonequilibrium statistical mechanics, dating back to −∞ Einstein’s Nobel Prize-winning work on Brownian motion [1] and Nyquist’s seminal work on electronic conductivity [2].
  • Curriculum Vitae

    Curriculum Vitae

    Curriculum Vitæ1 ZANARDI, Paolo, Italian and USA Citizenship. Education : 1992{1995 PhD in Physics: Universit`adi Roma \Tor Vergata" Linearization schemes for strongly correlated systems of lattice fermions . Supervisor: Prof. Mario Rasetti (Politecnico of Torino) 1986{1992 M.D. in Physics Universit`adegli Studi di Modena: Dynamical aspects of the atom-surface interaction . Advisor: C. Calandra (Final mark: 110/110 cum laude). Positions occupied: 02/01/13{05/31/13 Visiting Research Professor at the National University of Singa- pore, Centre for Quantum Technologies, Singapore 12/15/11| Full Professor of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southern Califor- nia, Los Angeles (CA) USA 01/01/07{12/15/12 Associate Professor of Physics and Astronomy, University of South- ern California, Los Angeles (CA) USA 07/08/05 {07/09/05 JSPS Visiting Scientist at the Kinki University, Osaka (Japan) 01/11/04 { 30/11/04 Appointment as Visiting Professor at the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, Waterloo ON (Canada) 01/10/04 { 31/10/04 Appointment as Visiting Scientist (CMI fellow) at the Mas- sachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge MA (USA). 1/03 { 12/03 Appointment as Visiting Scientist (CMI fellow) at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge MA (USA). [3/03 { 6/03, 10/03{ 12/03] 1/01 { present ISI Foundation, Scientific consultant of the Quantum Information The- ory group Scientific Coordinator of the European FET Project TOPQIP 1Last revision: 10/17/17 02{ 04 High-school professorship in Mathematics [Istituto Tecnico G. Einaudi, Correg- gio (RE)] On leave (\congedo per ragioni di studio e ricerca") up to 2004 when I resigned.
  • Path Integrals with Μ1(X) and Μ2(X) the first and Second Moments of the Transition Probabilities

    Path Integrals with Μ1(X) and Μ2(X) the first and Second Moments of the Transition Probabilities

    1 Introduction to path integrals with ¹1(x) and ¹2(x) the ¯rst and second moments of the transition probabilities. v. January 22, 2006 Another approach is to use path integrals. We will use Phys 719 - M. Hilke the example of a simple brownian motion (the random walk) to illustrate the concept of the path integral (or Wiener integral) in this context. CONTENT ² Classical stochastic dynamics DISCRETE RANDOM WALK ² Brownian motion (random walk) ² Quantum dynamics The discrete random walk describes a particle (or per- son) moving along ¯xed segments for ¯xed time intervals ² Free particle (of unit 1). The choice of direction for each new segment ² Particle in a potential is random. We will assume that only perpendicular di- rection are possible (4 possibilities in 2D and 6 in 3D). ² Driven harmonic oscillator The important quantity is the probability to reach x at 0 0 ² Semiclassical approximation time t, when the random walker started at x at time t : ² Statistical description (imaginary time) P (x; t; x0; t0): (3) ² Quantum dissipative systems For this probability the following normalization condi- tions apply: INTRODUCTION X 0 0 0 0 P (x; t; x ; t) = ±x;x0 and for (t > t ) P (x; t; x ; t ) = 1: Path integrals are used in a variety of ¯elds, including x stochastic dynamics, polymer physics, protein folding, (4) ¯eld theories, quantum mechanics, quantum ¯eld theo- This leads to ries, quantum gravity and string theory. The basic idea 1 X is to sum up all contributing paths. Here we will overview P (x; t + 1; x0; t0) = P (»; t; x0; t0); (5) the technique be starting on classical dynamics, in par- 2D h»i ticular, the random walk problem before we discuss the quantum case by looking at a particle in a potential, and where h»i represent the nearest neighbors of x.
  • An Introduction to Quantum Annealing

    An Introduction to Quantum Annealing

    An introduction to quantum annealing Diego de Falco and Dario Tamascelli Dipartimento di Scienze dell’Informazione, Universit`adegli Studi di Milano Via Comelico, 39/41, 20135 Milano- Italy e-mail:[email protected],[email protected] Abstract Quantum Annealing, or Quantum Stochastic Optimization, is a classical randomized algorithm which provides good heuristics for the solution of hard optimization problems. The algorithm, suggested by the behaviour of quantum systems, is an example of proficuous cross contamination between classical and quantum computer science. In this survey paper we illustrate how hard combinatorial problems are tackled by quantum computation and present some examples of the heuristics provided by Quantum Annealing. We also present prelimi- nary results about the application of quantum dissipation (as an alter- native to Imaginary Time Evolution) to the task of driving a quantum system toward its state of lowest energy. 1 Introduction Quantum computation stems from a simple observation[23, 19]: any com- putation is ultimately performed on a physical device; to any input-output relation there must correspond a change in the state of the device. If the device is microscopic, then its evolution is ruled by the laws of quantum arXiv:1107.0794v1 [quant-ph] 5 Jul 2011 mechanics. The question of whether the change of evolution rules can lead to a break- through in computational complexity theory is still unanswered [11, 34, 40]. What is known is that a quantum computer would outperform a classi- cal one in specific tasks such as integer factorization [47] and searching an unordered database [28, 29]. In fact, Grover’s algorithm can search a key- word quadratically faster than any classical algorithm, whereas in the case of Shor’s factorization the speedup is exponential.
  • Energy-Temperature Uncertainty Relation in Quantum Thermodynamics

    Energy-Temperature Uncertainty Relation in Quantum Thermodynamics

    ARTICLE DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04536-7 OPEN Energy-temperature uncertainty relation in quantum thermodynamics H.J.D. Miller1 & J. Anders1 It is known that temperature estimates of macroscopic systems in equilibrium are most precise when their energy fluctuations are large. However, for nanoscale systems deviations from standard thermodynamics arise due to their interactions with the environment. Here we 1234567890():,; include such interactions and, using quantum estimation theory, derive a generalised ther- modynamic uncertainty relation valid for classical and quantum systems at all coupling strengths. We show that the non-commutativity between the system’s state and its effective energy operator gives rise to quantum fluctuations that increase the temperature uncertainty. Surprisingly, these additional fluctuations are described by the average Wigner-Yanase- Dyson skew information. We demonstrate that the temperature’s signal-to-noise ratio is constrained by the heat capacity plus a dissipative term arising from the non-negligible interactions. These findings shed light on the interplay between classical and non-classical fluctuations in quantum thermodynamics and will inform the design of optimal nanoscale thermometers. 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QL, UK. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to H.J.D.M. (email: [email protected]) or to J.A. (email: [email protected]) NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2018) 9:2203 | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04536-7 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04536-7 ohr suggested that there should exist a form of com- estimate, and we illustrate our bound with an example of a Bplementarity between temperature and energy in thermo- damped harmonic oscillator.
  • Chapter 3 Feynman Path Integral

    Chapter 3 Feynman Path Integral

    Chapter 3 Feynman Path Integral The aim of this chapter is to introduce the concept of the Feynman path integral. As well as developing the general construction scheme, particular emphasis is placed on establishing the interconnections between the quantum mechanical path integral, classical Hamiltonian mechanics and classical statistical mechanics. The practice of path integration is discussed in the context of several pedagogical applications: As well as the canonical examples of a quantum particle in a single and double potential well, we discuss the generalisation of the path integral scheme to tunneling of extended objects (quantum fields), dissipative and thermally assisted quantum tunneling, and the quantum mechanical spin. In this chapter we will temporarily leave the arena of many–body physics and second quantisation and, at least superficially, return to single–particle quantum mechanics. By establishing the path integral approach for ordinary quantum mechanics, we will set the stage for the introduction of functional field integral methods for many–body theories explored in the next chapter. We will see that the path integral not only represents a gateway to higher dimensional functional integral methods but, when viewed from an appropriate perspective, already represents a field theoretical approach in its own right. Exploiting this connection, various techniques and concepts of field theory, viz. stationary phase analyses of functional integrals, the Euclidean formulation of field theory, instanton techniques, and the role of topological concepts in field theory will be motivated and introduced in this chapter. 3.1 The Path Integral: General Formalism Broadly speaking, there are two basic approaches to the formulation of quantum mechan- ics: the ‘operator approach’ based on the canonical quantisation of physical observables Concepts in Theoretical Physics 64 CHAPTER3.
  • Absence of Spin-Boson Quantum Phase Transition for Transmon Qubits

    Absence of Spin-Boson Quantum Phase Transition for Transmon Qubits

    Absence of spin-boson quantum phase transition for transmon qubits Kuljeet Kaur,1 Th´eoS´epulcre,2 Nicolas Roch,2 Izak Snyman,3 Serge Florens,2 and Soumya Bera1 1Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai 400076, India 2Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Institut N´eel,F-38000 Grenoble, France 3Mandelstam Institute for Theoretical Physics, School of Physics, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa Superconducting circuits are currently developed as a versatile platform for the exploration of many-body physics, both at the analog and digital levels. Their building blocks are often idealized as two-level qubits, drawing powerful analogies to quantum spin models. For a charge qubit that is capacitively coupled to a transmission line, this analogy leads to the celebrated spin-boson de- scription of quantum dissipation. We put here into evidence a failure of the two-level paradigm for realistic superconducting devices, due to electrostatic constraints which limit the maximum strength of dissipation. These prevent the occurence of the spin-boson quantum phase transition for trans- mons, even up to relatively large non-linearities. A different picture for the many-body ground state describing strongly dissipative transmons is proposed, showing unusual zero point fluctuations. Quantum computation has been hailed as a promising siderations impose strong constraints on the underlying avenue to tackle a large class of unsolved problems, from models. Third, many-body effects beyond the RWA ap- physics and chemistry [1] to algorithmic complexity [2], proximation are notoriously difficult to simulate due to following an original proposition from Feynman [3], long an exponentially large Hilbert space, for instance in the before the technological and conceptual tools were devel- ultra-strong coupling regime of dissipation [21{23].
  • Non-Markovian Open Quantum Dynamics from Dissipative Few-Level Systems to Quantum Thermal Machines Michael Wiedmann 2019

    Non-Markovian Open Quantum Dynamics from Dissipative Few-Level Systems to Quantum Thermal Machines Michael Wiedmann 2019

    Non-Markovian Open Quantum Dynamics from Dissipative Few-level Systems to Quantum Thermal Machines kumulative Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades Dr. rer. nat. der Fakult¨atf¨ur Naturwissenschaften der Universit¨atUlm vorgelegt von Michael Wiedmann aus Hambach bei Schweinfurt 2019 Amtierender Dekan: Prof. Dr. Thorsten Bernhardt Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Joachim Ankerhold Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Matthias Freyberger Tag der Promotion: 20. Dezember 2019 List of publications This cumulative thesis is composed of the following peer-reviewed publications which will be discussed in chronological order: 2016 Time-correlated blip dynamics of open quantum systems, M. Wiedmann, J. T. Stockburger, J. Ankerhold, Phys. Rev. A, 052137 2018 Rectification of heat currents across nonlinear quantum chains: A versatile approach beyond weak thermal contact, T. Motz, M. Wiedmann, J. T. Stockburger, J. Ankerhold, New J. Phys. 20, 113020 2019 Out-of-equilibrium operation of a quantum heat engine: The cost of thermal coupling control, M. Wiedmann, J. T. Stockburger, J. Ankerhold, submitted: https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.11368 v Contents 1 Introduction1 2 Non-Markovian open quantum systems5 2.1 Caldeira-Leggett model and generalized Langevin equation.......6 2.2 Path integral approach and stochastic unraveling............9 2.3 Ohmic reservoirs with frequency cutoff - the SLED........... 15 2.3.1 Time-dependent reservoir coupling................ 16 2.3.2 Adjoint equation of motion..................... 19 2.3.3 System-reservoir correlations in SLED probability space..... 20 2.3.4 SLED with momentum-coupled z(t)-noise............ 25 2.4 Projection operator techniques....................... 27 3 Finite-memory, stochastic reduced state propagation 31 3.1 Spin-boson system............................. 34 3.2 Dissipative three-level system......................