Energy-Temperature Uncertainty Relation in Quantum Thermodynamics
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ARTICLE DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04536-7 OPEN Energy-temperature uncertainty relation in quantum thermodynamics H.J.D. Miller1 & J. Anders1 It is known that temperature estimates of macroscopic systems in equilibrium are most precise when their energy fluctuations are large. However, for nanoscale systems deviations from standard thermodynamics arise due to their interactions with the environment. Here we 1234567890():,; include such interactions and, using quantum estimation theory, derive a generalised ther- modynamic uncertainty relation valid for classical and quantum systems at all coupling strengths. We show that the non-commutativity between the system’s state and its effective energy operator gives rise to quantum fluctuations that increase the temperature uncertainty. Surprisingly, these additional fluctuations are described by the average Wigner-Yanase- Dyson skew information. We demonstrate that the temperature’s signal-to-noise ratio is constrained by the heat capacity plus a dissipative term arising from the non-negligible interactions. These findings shed light on the interplay between classical and non-classical fluctuations in quantum thermodynamics and will inform the design of optimal nanoscale thermometers. 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QL, UK. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to H.J.D.M. (email: [email protected]) or to J.A. (email: [email protected]) NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2018) 9:2203 | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04536-7 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04536-7 ohr suggested that there should exist a form of com- estimate, and we illustrate our bound with an example of a Bplementarity between temperature and energy in thermo- damped harmonic oscillator. dynamics similar to that of position and momentum in quantum theory1. His reasoning was that in order to assign a Results definite temperature T to a system it must be brought in contact The Wigner-Yanase-Dyson skew information. Our analysis with a thermal reservoir, in which case the energy U of the system throughout the paper will rely on distinguishing between classical fluctuates due to exchanges with the reservoir. On the other hand, and non-classical fluctuations of observables in quantum to assign a sharp energy to the system it must be isolated from the mechanics, and we first present a framework for quantifying these reservoir, rendering the system’s temperature T uncertain. Based different forms of statistical uncertainty for arbitrary mixed states. on this heuristic argument Bohr conjectured the thermodynamic Let us consider a quantum state ^ρ and an observable A^. Wigner uncertainty relation: and Yanase considered the problem of quantifying the quantum ^ ^ρ 41 1 uncertainty in observable A for the case where is mixed . Δβ ; ð1Þ However, they observed that the standard measure of uncertainty, ΔU namely the variance Var½^ρ; A^ := tr½^ρδA^2 with δA^ = A^ À A^ , − with β = (k T) 1 the inverse temperature. While Eq. (1) has since contains classical contributions due to mixing, and thus fails to B – ^ been derived in various settings2 9, it was Mandelbrot who first fully quantify the non-classical fluctuations in the observable A. based the concept of fluctuating temperature on the theory of This problem can be resolved by finding a quantum measure of ^ ^ statistical inference. Concretely, for a thermal system in canonical uncertainty Q½^ρ; A and classical measure K½^ρ; A such that the equilibrium, Δβ can be interpreted as the standard deviation variance can be partitioned according to associated with estimates of the parameter β. Mandelbrot proved Var½^ρ; A^¼Q½^ρ; A^þK½^ρ; A^: ð2Þ that Eq. (1) sets the ultimate limit on simultaneous estimates of energy and temperature in classical statistical physics2. fl The notion of uctuating temperature has proved to be fun- 47 fi Following the framework introduced by Luo , these functions damental in the emerging eld of quantum thermometry, where fi advances in nanotechnology now allow temperature sensing at are required to ful l three conditions: (i) both terms should be – ½^ρ; ^ ½^ρ; ^ sub-micron scales10 22. Using the tools of quantum metrology23, non-negative, Q A 0 and K A 0, so that they can be interpreted as forms of statistical uncertainty, (ii) if the state ^ρ is the relation Eq. (1) can also be derived for weakly coupled ½^ρ; ^ = ½^ρ; ^ ½^ρ; ^¼ quantum systems11,12,14, where the equilibrium state is best pure, then Q A Var A while K A 0 as all uncertainty should be associated to quantum fluctuations alone, (iii) Q½^ρ; A^ described by the canonical ensemble. Within the grand-canonical ^ρ ensemble the impact of the indistinguishability of quantum par- must be convex with respect to , so that it decreases under classical mixing. Correspondingly, K½^ρ; A^ must be concave with ticles on the estimation of temperature and the chemical potential ^ρ has also been explored24. Relation Eq. (1) informs us that when respect to . The following function, known as the WYD skew informa- designing an accurate quantum thermometer one should search 41 for systems with Hamiltonians that produce a large energy tion was shown to be a valid measure of quantum uncertainty: 14 1 À variance . Q ½^ρ; A^ :¼À tr½½A^; ^ρa½A^; ^ρ1 a; a 2ð0; 1Þ; ð3Þ Recently there has been an emerging interest into the effects of a 2 strong coupling on temperature estimation13,15,25. At the nanoscale the strength of interactions between the system and the with the complementary classical uncertainty given by À reservoir may become non-negligible, and the local equilibrium K ½^ρ; A^ :¼ tr½^ρa δA^ ^ρ1 aδA^; a 2ð0; 1Þ: ð4Þ state of the system will not be of Gibbs form26,27. In this regime a thermodynamics needs to be adapted as the equilibrium prop- While conditions (i) and (ii) are easily verified, the convexity/ erties of the system must now depend on the interaction ½^ρ; ^ ½^ρ; ^ 28–40 fl concavity of Qa A and Ka A respectively can be proven energy . We will see that the internal energy U and its uc- using Lieb’s concavity theorem. tuations ΔU are determined by a modified internal energy ^à The presence of the parameter a demonstrates that there is no operator, denoted by ES, that differs from the bare Hamiltonian unique way of separating the quantum and classical contributions 35,39 of the system . This modification brings into question the to the variance. We here follow the suggestion made in refs. 43,44 validity of Eq. (1) for general classical and quantum systems, and and average over the interval a∈ (0, 1) to define two new the aim of this paper is to investigate the impact of strong cou- quantities: Z pling on the thermodynamic uncertainty relation. 1 Taking into account quantum properties of the effective ½^ρ; ^ :¼ ½^ρ; ^; ð Þ Q A daQa A 5 internal energy operator and its temperature dependence, we here 0 derive the general thermodynamic uncertainty principle valid at Z all coupling strengths. Formally this result follows from a general 1 ½^ρ; ^ :¼ ½^ρ; ^: ð Þ upper bound on the quantum Fisher information (QFI) for K A daKa A 6 exponential states. We prove that quantum fluctuations arising 0 from coherences between energy states of the system lead to fl increased uctuations in the underlying temperature. Most It is not only the Q ½^ρ; A^ and K ½^ρ; A^ that separate the interestingly, the non-classical modifications to Eq. (1) are a a ^ fi quantum and classical fluctuations of a quantum observable A in quanti ed by the average Wigner-Yanase-Dyson (WYD) skew ^ 41–44 a state ^ρ according to Eq. (2), but also the averaged Q½^ρ; A and information , which is a quantity closely linked to measures ^ of coherence, asymmetry and quantum speed limits45,46. We then K½^ρ; A. This follows from the linearity of the integrals in Eqs. (5) demonstrate that the skew information is also linked to the heat and (6) which also preserve the conditions (i)–(iii). Throughout capacity of the system through a modified fluctuation-dissipation the remainder of the paper we will consider Q½^ρ; A^ and K½^ρ; A^ as relation (FDR). This result is used to find an upper bound on the the relevant measures of quantum and classical uncertainty, achievable signal-to-noise ratio of an unbiased temperature respectively. While this may appear to be an arbitrary choice, we 2 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2018) 9:2203 | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04536-7 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04536-7 ARTICLE will subsequently prove that the average skew information is Generalised thermodynamic uncertainty relation. We will now intimately connected to thermodynamics. use the results of the previous section to derive an uncertainty relation between energy and temperature for a quantum system Bound on quantum Fisher information for exponential states. strongly interacting with a reservoir. To achieve this we will first We now prove that the average skew information is linked to the discuss the appropriate energy operator for such a system, and quality of a parameter estimate for a quantum exponential state. then proceed to generalise Eq. (1). À^ ^ρ = Aθ = A quantum system S that interacts with a reservoir R is A quantum^ exponential state is of the form θ e Zθ where ÀAθ ^ Zθ ¼ tr½e and Aθ is a hermitian operator that is here assumed described by a Hamiltonian to depend analytically on a smooth parameter θ. For any state of ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ HS ∪ R :¼ HS IR þ IS HR þ VS ∪ R; ð9Þ full rank, an operator Aθ can be found such that the state can be expressed in this form, i.e.