Notice of Annual Stockholders' Meeting
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Private Equity and Value Creation in Frontier Markets: the Need for an Operational Approach
WhatResearch a CAIA Member Review Should Know Investment Strategies CAIAInvestmentCAIA Member Member Strategies Contribution Contribution Private Equity and Value Creation in Frontier Markets: The Need for an Operational Approach Stephen J. Mezias Afzal Amijee Professor of Entrepreneurship and Family Enterprise Founder and CEO of Vimodi, a novel visual discussion with INSEAD, based at the Abu Dhabi campus application and Entrepreneur in Residence at INSEAD 42 Alternative Investment Analyst Review Private Equity and Value Creation in Frontier Markets Private Equity and Value Creation in Frontier Markets What a CAIA Member Should Know Investment Strategies 1. Introduction ership stakes, earning returns for themselves and the Nowhere else is the operational value creation approach LPs who invested with them. While this clarifies that more in demand than in the Middle East North Africa capturing premiums through ownership transactions is (MENA) region. Advocating and building operational a primary goal for GPs, it does not completely address capabilities requires active investment in business pro- the question of what GPs need to do to make the stakes cesses, human capital, and a long-term horizon. Devel- more valuable before selling the companies in question. oping the capabilities of managers to deliver value from There are many ways that the GPs can manage their in- operations will not only result in building capacity for vestments to increase value, ranging from bringing in great companies, but will also raise the bar for human functional expertise, e.g., sound financial management, talent and organizational capability in the region. In the to bringing in specific sector operational expertise, e.g., long term, direct support and nurturing of the new gen- superior logistics capabilities. -
Notice of Annual Stockholders' Meeting
NOTICE OF ANNUAL STOCKHOLDERS’ MEETING INVESTOR ENGAGEMent We are proud of our long-standing and robust investor engagement program. Our integrated outreach team, led by our During 2019, our engagement program addressed SUMMER corporate Review annual governance meeting results to determine appropriate best practices, next steps, and prioritize post-annual our executive meeting investor engagement focus compensation areas To see how we responded to your feedback, program, our see page 38. Board’s operation and experience, and FALL Hold post-annual our commitment meeting investor meetings to solicit to addressing feedback and report to the Board and environmental and Corporate Governance social responsibility and Nominating Committee TOTAL CONTACTED issues that are critical to our business. WINTER Incorporate input from investor meetings into annual meeting planning and Through direct enhance governance and compensation participation in practices and disclosures when our engagement warranted TOTAL ENGAGED engagement teams, SPRING our directors are Conduct pre-annual meeting investor able to monitor meetings to answer questions and developments understand investor views on proxy in corporate matters governance and social responsibility our stockholders’ ANNUAL perspectives on STOCKHOLDERS’ DIRECTOR ENGAGED these topics. In MEETING to thoughtfully adopt and apply developing practices in a manner that best supports our business and our culture. adopted is discussed under “Investor Engagement” on page 37. Intel’s outstanding shares (O/S) calculated as of September 30, 2019 LETTERFROMYOURCHAIRMAN DEAR STOCKHOLDER, Our strategic evolution to capitalize on the exponential In keeping with our strong commitment to independent growth of data and help customers unleash its potential with Board oversight, we have long separated the roles of Board technology to process, store, and move more data, faster, is Chairman and CEO. -
Operating Partners Forum
Pricing Registration Preferred price Full price privateequityinternational.com/opny Registration type ends April 26 after April 26th [email protected] General delegate GPs Operating +1 212 633 1073 are defined as the in-house SAVE $500 finance and operations US $3,295 US $2,995 executivesPartners at private equity Forum andNew venture capital firmsYork 2019 Venue OctoberService provider 16-17 A| Convene, 117 West 46th Street Convene service provider is defined as any professional services 117 West 46th Street organization which provides New York, NY 10036 Theadvisor service largest and technology global event for solutions to private fund $3,495 privatemanagers and operating equity value creators partners. There is no Hotel accommodations discounted pricing for service Kimpton Muse Hotel providers. 130 W 46th St To register visit: www.privateequityinternational.com/opny New York, NY 10036 Now in its ninth year, Private Equity International’s Operating Partners Forum: New York is the single largest event in the world specifically dedicated to anyone concerned about private equity portfolio operational assessment and value creation. The Forum continues to be the signature meeting space to connect 400+ attendees with opportunities to network with leading operating partners, learn how to best position yourself in your career as an operating partner, explore the latest value creation plans, compare operational models and gain insight from seasoned value creators. Agenda highlights Wednesday, October 16 » Functional Business Series 1 » Women -
Funds, Fees & Affiliates
FUNDS, FEES & AFFILIATES (OH MY!) SEC OCIE’s Examination of the Private Fund World Moderators: James W. Van Horn, Jr., Hirschler Fleischer, PC Marc R. Lieberman, Kutak Rock LLP Presenters: Matthew D. Harris, Securities Exchange Commission, Chicago Office Edward Schwartz, ORG Portfolio Management NAPPA SEC Working Group Panel 2015 NAPPA Legal Education Conference June 25, 2015 AGENDA I. Overview Marc Lieberman II. OCIE Examinations Matthew Harris A. Examination Process B. Exam Priorities C. Examination Results III. Panel Discussion Jim Van Horn Marc Lieberman A. Fee Allocations, Disclosure & Transparency Matt Harris B. Fiduciary Duty of Private Fund Advisers Ed Schwartz C. Role of Fund Administrators & Auditors D. Independent Monitors IV. Questions F UNDS, FEES & AFFILIATES (OH M Y!) J UNE 25, 2015 2 OVERVIEW Increased Federal Oversight of Private Investment Funds 2010 – Dodd-Frank Act amends Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (Advisers Act) - Private Fund Advisers (PFAs) must register with SEC June 2011 – SEC Adopts Rules - PFAs ≥ $150 mm to register Oct. 9, 2012 – OCIE Letter to PFAs announcing “Presence Exams” May 2, 2012 – OCIE Director di Florio Speech – PFA Compliance with Advisers Act F UNDS, FEES & AFFILIATES (OH M Y!) J UNE 25, 2015 3 OVERVIEW Increased Federal Oversight of Private Investment Funds May 11, 2012 – OCIE Director Champ Speech - “What SEC Registration Means for Hedge Fund Advisers” January 9, 2014 – OCIE /NEP Examination Priorities for 2014 (PFAs prioritized) January 28, 2014 – OCIE “Risk Alert” re: investor -
In the Matter of Blackstreet Capital Management, LLC and Murry N
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Release No. 77959 / June 1, 2016 INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940 Release No. 4411 / June 1, 2016 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 3-17267 In the Matter of ORDER INSTITUTING ADMINISTRATIVE AND CEASE-AND-DESIST PROCEEDINGS, BLACKSTREET CAPITAL PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 15(b) AND 21C MANAGEMENT, LLC OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF and 1934, AND SECTIONS 203(e) AND 203(k) OF MURRY N. GUNTY, THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940, MAKING FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS AND A CEASE- Respondents. AND-DESIST ORDER I. The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate and in the public interest that public administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Sections 15(b) and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), and Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”) against Blackstreet Capital Management, LLC (“BCM”) and Murry N. Gunty (“Gunty”) (collectively, “Respondents”). II. In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondents have submitted an Offer of Settlement (the “Offer”), which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over them and the subject matter of these proceedings, which are admitted, and except as provided herein in Section V, Respondents consent to the entry of this Order Instituting Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings, Pursuant to Sections 15(b) and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”), as set forth below. -
September 29, 2020
Plymouth County Retirement Association September 29, 2020 Meeting Materials BOSTON CHICAGO LONDON MIAMI NEW YORK PORTLAND SAN DIEGO MEKETA.COM Plymouth County Retirement Association Agenda Agenda 1. Estimated Retirement Association Performance As of August 31, 2020 2. Performance Update As of July 31, 2020 3. Current Issues Non-Core Real Estate RFP Respondent Review Non-Core Infrastructure Finalist Presentations 4. Disclaimer, Glossary, and Notes 2 of 129 Estimated Retirement Association Performance As of August 31, 2020 3 of 129 Plymouth County Retirement Association Estimated Retirement Association Performance Estimated Aggregate Performance1 August2 QTD YTD 1 YR 3 YR 5 YR 10 YR (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) Total Retirement Association 2.7 6.3 0.5 7.8 5.0 6.4 7.9 Policy Benchmark 3.1 6.8 3.0 10.1 6.9 7.7 8.5 Benchmark Returns August QTD YTD 1 YR 3 YR 5 YR 10 YR (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) Russell 3000 7.2 13.3 9.4 21.4 14.0 13.9 14.9 MSCI EAFE 5.1 7.6 -4.6 6.4 2.3 4.7 5.9 MSCI Emerging Markets 2.2 11.3 0.5 14.5 2.8 8.7 3.8 Barclays Aggregate -0.8 0.7 6.9 6.5 5.1 4.3 3.7 Barclays TIPS 1.1 3.4 9.6 9.0 5.7 4.6 3.7 Barclays High Yield 1.0 5.7 1.7 4.7 4.9 6.5 6.9 JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified (Local Currency) -0.3 2.7 -4.4 1.7 0.7 4.6 1.3 S&P Global Natural Resources 4.0 7.6 -13.0 -1.9 -0.1 5.6 1.5 Estimated Total Assets Estimate Total Retirement Association $1,106,611,546 1 The August performance estimates are calculated using index returns as of August 31, 2020 for each asset class. -
Views on Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and As a Matter of Good Corporate Governance
WORKDAY, INC. 6230 STONERIDGE MALL ROAD PLEASANTON, CALIFORNIA 94588 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS To Be Held at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Daylight Time on Wednesday, June 1, 2016 April 21, 2016 TO THE HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK OF WORKDAY, INC.: The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Workday, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Workday), will be held on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Daylight Time, at 6160 Stoneridge Mall Road, Pleasanton, California, for the following purposes as more fully described in the accompanying Proxy Statement: 1. To elect three Class I directors to serve until the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders and until their respective successors are elected and qualified, subject to their earlier resignation or removal; 2. To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending January 31, 2017; 3. To conduct an advisory vote to approve the compensation paid to Workday’s named executive officers; 4. To approve a limit on annual awards to non-employee directors under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan; and 5. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. The Board of Directors of Workday fixed the close of business on April 4, 2016 as the record date for the meeting. Only stockholders of record of our common stock at the close of business on April 4, 2016 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting. Further information regarding voting rights and the matters to be voted upon is presented in our proxy statement. -
Views on Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and As a Matter of Good Corporate Governance
WORKDAY, INC. 6230 STONERIDGE MALL ROAD PLEASANTON, CALIFORNIA 94588 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS To Be Held at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Daylight Time on Wednesday, June 3, 2015 April 20, 2015 TO THE HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK OF WORKDAY, INC.: The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Workday, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Workday), will be held on Wednesday, June 3, 2015, at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Daylight Time, at 6160 Stoneridge Mall Road, Pleasanton, California, for the following purposes as more fully described in the accompanying Proxy Statement: 1. To elect two Class III directors to serve until the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are elected and qualified, subject to their earlier resignation or removal; 2. To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending January 31, 2016; 3. To conduct an advisory vote regarding named executive officer compensation; 4. To conduct an advisory vote regarding the frequency of the advisory vote on named executive officer compensation; and 5. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. The Board of Directors of Workday fixed the close of business on April 6, 2015 as the record date for the meeting. Only stockholders of record of our common stock at the close of business on April 6, 2015 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting. Further information regarding voting rights and the matters to be voted upon is presented in our proxy statement. -
Exit Mechanisms in Joint Venture Agreements by Joan Hayden And
Beginning with the End in Mind: Exit Mechanisms in Joint Venture Agreements By Joan Hayden and John Sullivan 1 Introduction “Hope springs eternal in the human breast.” – Alexander Pope “Man plans; God laughs.” – Yiddish Proverb Although partners generally enter into a real estate joint venture with great expectations and an alignment of their respective interests, things can change with the passage of time: events intercede, needs change and parties can fall out of love – with the property, with each other, and sometimes with both. A variety of mechanisms can be included in joint venture agreements to facilitate a parting of the ways when one partner wants to sell the joint venture’s investments or discontinue its relationship with its partner and the other partner does not share those objectives. The typical joint venture exit mechanisms are well known; one or more of them are almost reflexively included in joint venture agreements.2 However, a more thoughtful approach to those familiar devices will often yield a better result for both partners. The first step is to understand the legal structure of each of the partners, their relative resources, liquidity and bargaining power, and their respective motivations and business goals. With these issues in mind counsel should analyze how each of the exit mechanisms may impact the partners at different points in the life of the venture, taking into account the appropriate triggers and other critical issues such as tax concerns, lender rights, and guaranty and indemnity obligations. Proper planning at the formation of the joint venture can preserve or prolong the alignment of interests by minimizing conflicts between the partners, and ultimately assist each partner in achieving its primary goals with respect to the property and the partnership if and when it is time for a “divorce”. -
Making the Case for Large Enterprise ERP Softw Are As a Service IDC
VENDOR PROFILE Workday Vendor Profile: Making the Case for Large Enterprise ERP Software as a Service Scott Guinn Robert P. Mahowald Michael Krigsman IDC OPINION m No longer confined to the realm of small- and midmarket businesses, software as a o c . service (SaaS) is making inroads into the largest government and private sector c d i . organizations, changing the face of enterprise software in the process. Pure-play w w w SaaS vendors such as salesforce.com in customer relationship management (CRM), SuccessFactors and Taleo in talent management, Ultimate Software in human capital 5 1 0 management (HCM), and Workday in both HCM and financial management may not 4 . 5 3 all be household names, but their collective impact on the large enterprise 9 . 8 applications technology landscape is profound and growing. On the surface, SaaS 0 5 . F appears to offer little impact on enterprise end users, aside from changing the 0 physical location of a datacenter. In reality, the impact involves an important paradigm 0 2 shift related to software delivery and consumption. As a pure-play SaaS vendor 8 . 2 7 serving the enterprise, Workday offers an excellent example of understanding critical 8 . 8 implications of the shift from on-premise to SaaS delivery. These important, market- 0 5 . P related changes include: A S A high-stakes battle for the business delivery model of the future — between U 1 0 large, on-premise vendors and smaller, more nimble cloud start-ups — over 7 1 0 control for enterprise computing dollars and mindshare A M , The convergence -
Operating Partners Technology Forum Virtual Experience 2020 December 1-2 | Virtual Event (EST)
Operating Partners Technology Forum Virtual Experience 2020 December 1-2 | Virtual Event (EST) Driving technology as a key value creation lever in PE & VC privateequityinternational.com/optech Contents » Virtual experience » Networking » Agenda highlights: Thinks tanks » Agenda highlights: Private equity » Agenda highlights: Venture capital » How it works » Speakers » Sponsors » Registration privateequityinternational.com/optech Utilize the virtual experience from anywhere in the world You also get: Without ever leaving the comfort and security of your » Built-in calendar to create your own home, you can enjoy ALL the 100 + value creation daily schedule so you don’t miss your experts sharing their practical guidance. Plus, you can favorite sessions participate in audience Q&A, polls, and download content and papers with just a few clicks. » Live panel discussions » Automated reminders » Interactive discussion boards » Networking meeting tools » Polling and surveys » On-demand playback, which gives you access to sessions for up to 6 months privateequityinternational.com/optech 3 of 14 | back to contents Networking at Take advantage of these benefits: 1. Use our searchable directory of delegates: your own pace Use our searchable directory of our delegates, solution providers and Online networking done right can speakers, so you can quickly find the right provide a very effective way for people people and companies to connect with. to build their professional relationships 2. Private messaging: and knowledge. Reach out privately and directly online (without having to expose email and phone number to “the world”). 3. Virtual meet-ups: Pre-schedule multi-person video conferences or one on one type meetups, allowing you to connect and talk about topics of interest. -
WORKDAY, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Filed by the Registrant ☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐ Check the appropriate box: ☐ Preliminary Proxy Statement ☐ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) ☒ Definitive Proxy Statement ☐ Definitive Additional Materials ☐ Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 WORKDAY, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): ☒ No fee required. ☐ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11 1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: 2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: 3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): 4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: 5) Total fee paid: ☐ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. ☐ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. 1) Amount Previously Paid: 2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: 3) Filing Party: 4) Date Filed: Table of Contents WORKDAY, INC.