Evaluating Captive-Breeding Techniques and Reintroduction Success of the California Condor (Gymnogyps Californianus)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evaluating Captive-Breeding Techniques and Reintroduction Success of the California Condor (Gymnogyps Californianus) Loma Linda University TheScholarsRepository@LLU: Digital Archive of Research, Scholarship & Creative Works Loma Linda University Electronic Theses, Dissertations & Projects 6-2010 Evaluating Captive-breeding Techniques and Reintroduction Success of the California Condor (Gymnogyps californianus) Amy C. Utt Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, and the Ornithology Commons Recommended Citation Utt, Amy C., "Evaluating Captive-breeding Techniques and Reintroduction Success of the California Condor (Gymnogyps californianus)" (2010). Loma Linda University Electronic Theses, Dissertations & Projects. 852. https://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/etd/852 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by TheScholarsRepository@LLU: Digital Archive of Research, Scholarship & Creative Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loma Linda University Electronic Theses, Dissertations & Projects by an authorized administrator of TheScholarsRepository@LLU: Digital Archive of Research, Scholarship & Creative Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LOMA LINDAUNIVERSITY School of Science and Technology In conjunction with the Faculty of GraduateStudies Evaluating Captive-breeding Techniques and Reintroduction Success of the California Condor (Gymnogyps californianus) by Amy C. Utt A dissertationsubmitted in partialsatisfaction of the requirements forthe degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biology June 2010 C 2010 Amy C. Utt All Rights Reserved Each person whose signature appears below certifies that this dissertation in his/her opinion is adequate, in scope and quality, as a dissertation for the degree Doctor of Philosophy. , Chairperson William K. Hayes, Professor of Biolos6C Ronald L. Carter, Provost Stephen G. Dunbar, Associate Professor of Biology (1.4 Floyd E. Hayes, Professor of Biology, Pacific Union College than R. Wall, Assistant Professor of Biochemistry, School of Medicine 111 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the many people and organizations for their assistance in making my dreams a reality. First, I would like to thank my committee members for their undying support, good advice, and most of all, believing in me. I have learned so much while working on this project, and I have Dr. William K. Hayes (Loma Linda University), Dr. Stephen G. Dunbar (Loma Linda University), Dr. Nancy Harvey (previously with CRES; Zoological Society of San Diego), Dr. Ronald Carter (Loma Linda University), Dr. Floyd Hayes (Pacific Union College), Dr. Laurence McCloskey (La Sierra University), and Dr. Nathan Wall (Loma Linda University) to thank. I would like to thank the Zoological Society of San Diego for allowing me to study the California Condors at the Wild Animal Park. In addition, I appreciated the condor keepers at the Wild Animal Park for their interest and cooperation in my research and data collection. I would especially like to thank Don Sterner and Tom Levites for going above and beyond and sharing their experiences with the California Condor recovery project, making sure I had access to whatever information I needed, and taking me behind the scenes to witness newly hatched California Condor chicks. I am forever grateful for the time, attention, and friendships of the condor keepers. I would also like to thank the Ventana Wilderness Society, Pinnacles National Monument with the National Park Service, and Hopper Mountain Wildlife Refuge Complex with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, for allowing me to observe California Condors at their respective release sites. The time I spent in the field has been valuable to iv me in so many ways. Several people I would like to single out include Joe Burnett, Bruce Palmer, Kelley Sorenson, Jessica Koning, Rebecca Leonard, Tom Leatherman, Greg Austin, and Mike Stockton. There are so many other people I have had the honor of working with while in the field, thank you. I want to share my gratitude with Los Angeles Zoo, Susie Kasielke, and Mike Clark for their cooperation with my research. My discussions with Mike at the Los Angeles Zoo offered me new insights into California Condor behaviors, and will be forever appreciated. I would like to thank the Department of Earth and Biological Sciences of Loma Linda University for helping to fund my research, along with a Grant in Aid of Research from the National Academy of Sciences (Administered by Sigma Xi, the Scientific Research Society), and a privately funded grant through the Zoological Society of San Diego. In addition, data collection would not have been possible without research permits from the National Park Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. I am grateful that there are so many people and organizations supporting conservation and behavioral research. I would like to thank my husband, Jonathan J. Rickard, who married me in the midst of this project. He supported my efforts, put up with me not being home for weeks at a time during our early years of marriage, and trusted in my ability to finish this project. He believed in me even when I didn't. Finally, I would like to thank my son, Benjamin, for sharing the first two years of his young life with mommy and her dissertation work. Your zest for life and intense curiosity in all things renewed my own child-like wonder in the natural world. There is nothing like experiencing the world though the eyes of a toddler! Thank you my sweet baby boy. I love you! vi For my son, Benjamin Reid Utt Rickard You are my sunshine... - vii CONTENTS Approval Page iii Acknowledgements iv List of Tables xii List of Figures xiv List of Abbreviations xv Abstract xvi Chapter 1. Life History and Conservation of the California Condor 1 Species Description and Taxonomy 1 Habitat and Distribution 3 Historical Distribution 4 Current Distribution 5 Reproduction & Development 6 Courtship 6 Parental Care 10 Chick Development 11 Causes for Decline 11 Past Threats 11 Current Threats 13 Conservation Efforts 13 Conservation Controversy 13 Conservation Measures 17 In Situ Conservation 17 Ex Situ Conservation 18 Reintroduction 20 Objectives 21 viii References 23 2. The Effects of Rearing Method on Social Behaviors of Mentored, Captive- reared Juvenile California Condors 28 Abstract 29 Introduction 31 Materials and Methods 35 Cohort 1 (2003) 36 Cohort 2 (2004) 43 Social Behaviors 47 Dominance Relationships 49 Statistics 50 Results 51 Juveniles: Rearing Method versus Mentoring Phase 51 Adult Mentors: Rearing Method versus Mentoring Phase 55 Dominance Rankings 55 Discussion 60 Future Considerations 64 Conclusions 65 Acknowledgments 66 References 67 3. Predictors of Behavioral Problems and Survival Following Release of Captive-reared California Condors 72 Abstract 73 Introduction 75 Materials and Methods 80 Data Compilation 80 Statistical Analyses 83 Results 86 Behavior Problems 86 Survival 90 Discussion 94 ix Sex 96 Facility 98 Rearing 99 Mentoring 100 Release Site 102 Age at Release 103 Population Size 104 Conclusions 105 Acknowledgements 106 References 107 4. Evaluating Captive-breeding and Reintroduction Methods in Avian Conservation: A Review 117 Abstract 117 Introduction 118 Multiple Clutching 131 Parent Rearing 134 Foster Parent Rearing 136 Intraspecific (Conspecific) Rearing 137 Interspecific (Cross-foster) Rearing 140 Puppet and Hand Rearing 144 Imprinting and Development Phase 147 Puppet Rearing 152 Hand Rearing 154 Group versus Isolate Housing 156 Behavior Management 157 Pre-Release Training 160 Mentoring 162 Predator Avoidance 166 Obstruction Avoidance 170 Release Methodologies 171 Hard Release 171 Soft Release 172 Acclimation 173 Predator Control 173 Supplemental Feeding 175 Monitoring 176 Hacking 177 In Situ versus Ex Situ Conservation 178 The Future of Captive Breeding 181 Defining Success 183 Conclusions 184 Acknowledgements 185 References 186 5. General Conclusions 208 Future Considerations and Implications 211 References 217 Appendices 221 A. Data Summarization 221 B. Order of Observations 226 C. Research Permits 229 D. IACUC Certification Certificate 233 E. Release Site Questionnaire and Results 235 F. Graph of Release Age California Condors (1996-2005) 239 xi TABLES Table Page 1. Definitions of mutually exclusive behaviors quantified in California Condors 48 2. Mean acts per hour for each of 17 social behaviors exhibited by juvenile California Condors 53 3. Mean acts per hour for each of 17 social behaviors exhibited by adult puppet-reared and parent-reared California Condors 56 4. Dominance rankings of individuals from cohort 1 and cohort 2 57 5. Relationship diagnostics from dominance hierarchy analysis of "combined dominance" 58 6. Dominance matrix indicating frequency of "combined dominance" interactions for cohort 1 and cohort 2 59 7. Established population size (number of free-flying individuals) of California Condors (Gymnogyps califomianus) by year and release site 84 8. Summary of results for juvenile California Condors exhibiting behavioral problems at 1 and 2 yr after release into the wild 88 9. Logistic regression results for analyses of behavioral problems in juvenile California Condors 89 10. Summary of results for juvenile California Condors survival at 1 and 2 yr after release into the wild 91 11. Logistic regression results for analyses of survival in juvenile California Condors at 1 and 2 yr after release into the wild 93 12. Summary
Recommended publications
  • Dietary Behavior of the Mangrove Monitor Lizard (Varanus Indicus)
    DIETARY BEHAVIOR OF THE MANGROVE MONITOR LIZARD (VARANUS INDICUS) ON COCOS ISLAND, GUAM, AND STRATEGIES FOR VARANUS INDICUS ERADICATION A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI’I AT HILO IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN TROPICAL CONSERVATION BIOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE MAY 2016 By Seamus P. Ehrhard Thesis Committee: William Mautz, Chairperson Donald Price Patrick Hart Acknowledgements I would like to thank Guam’s Department of Agriculture, the Division of Aquatic and Wildlife Resources, and wildlife biologist, Diane Vice, for financial assistance, research materials, and for offering me additional staffing, which greatly aided my fieldwork on Guam. Additionally, I would like to thank Dr. William Mautz for his consistent help and effort, which exceeded all expectations of an advisor, and without which I surely would have not completed my research or been inspired to follow my passion of herpetology to the near ends of the earth. 2 Abstract The mangrove monitor lizard (Varanus indicus), a large invasive predator, can be found on all areas of the 38.6 ha Cocos Island at an estimated density, in October 2011, of 6 V. Indicus per hectare on the island. Plans for the release of the endangered Guam rail (Gallirallus owstoni) on Cocos Island required the culling of V. Indicus, because the lizards are known to consume birds and bird eggs. Cocos Island has 7 different habitats; resort/horticulture, Casuarina forest, mixed strand forest, Pemphis scrub, Scaevola scrub, sand/open area, and wetlands. I removed as many V. Indicus as possible from the three principal habitats; Casuarina forest, mixed scrub forest, and a garbage dump (resort/horticulture) using six different trapping methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Short Communications
    SHORT COMMUNICATIONS J. Raptor Res. 53(4):419–430 Ó 2019 The Raptor Research Foundation, Inc. COMMENTARY:DEFINING RAPTORS AND BIRDS OF PREY 1 CHRISTOPHER J. W. MCCLURE, SARAH E. SCHULWITZ, AND DAVID L. ANDERSON The Peregrine Fund, 5668 West Flying Hawk Lane, Boise, ID 83709 USA BRYCE W. ROBINSON Ornithologi, PO Box 6423, Boise, ID 83707 USA ELIZABETH K. MOJICA EDM International, Inc. 4001 Automation Way, Fort Collins, CO 80526 USA JEAN-FRANCOIS THERRIEN Hawk Mountain Sanctuary, 410 Summer Valley Road, Orwigsburg, PA 17961 USA M. DAVID OLEYAR HawkWatch International, 2240 South 900 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84106 USA JEFF JOHNSON University of North Texas, Department of Biological Sciences, 1155 Union Circle #310559, Denton, TX 76203 USA ABSTRACT.—Species considered raptors are subjects of monitoring programs, textbooks, scientific societies, legislation, and multinational agreements. Yet no standard definition for the synonymous terms ‘‘raptor’’ or ‘‘bird of prey’’ exists. Groups, including owls, vultures, corvids, and shrikes are variably considered raptors based on morphological, ecological, and taxonomic criteria, depending on the authors. We review various criteria previously used to define raptors and we present an updated definition that incorporates current understanding of bird phylogeny. For example, hunting live vertebrates has been largely accepted as an ecological trait of raptorial birds, yet not all species considered raptors are raptorial (e.g., Palm-nut Vulture [Gypohierax angolensis]), and not all raptorial birds are considered raptors (e.g., skuas [Stercorariidae]). Acute vision, a hooked bill, and sharp talons are the most commonly used morphological characters for delineating raptors; however, using those characters as criteria may cause confusion because they can be vague and exceptions are sometimes made.
    [Show full text]
  • Unsustainable Food Systems Threaten Wild Crop and Dolphin Species
    INTERNATIONAL PRESS RELEASE Embargoed until: 07:00 GMT (16:00 JST) 5 December 2017 Elaine Paterson, IUCN Media Relations, t+44 1223 331128, email [email protected] Goska Bonnaveira, IUCN Media Relations, m +41 792760185, email [email protected] [In Japan] Cheryl-Samantha MacSharry, IUCN Media Relations, t+44 1223 331128, email [email protected] Download photographs here Download summary statistics here Unsustainable food systems threaten wild crop and dolphin species Tokyo, Japan, 5 December 2017 (IUCN) – Species of wild rice, wheat and yam are threatened by overly intensive agricultural production and urban expansion, whilst poor fishing practices have caused steep declines in the Irrawaddy Dolphin and Finless Porpoise, according to the latest update of The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™. Today’s Red List update also reveals that a drying climate is pushing the Ringtail Possum to the brink of extinction. Three reptile species found only on an Australian island – the Christmas Island Whiptail-skink, the Blue- tailed Skink (Cryptoblepharus egeriae) and the Lister’s Gecko – have gone extinct, according to the update. But in New Zealand, conservation efforts have improved the situation for two species of Kiwi. “Healthy, species-rich ecosystems are fundamental to our ability to feed the world’s growing population and achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goal 2 – to end hunger by 2030,” says IUCN Director General Inger Andersen. “Wild crop species, for example, maintain genetic diversity of agricultural crops
    [Show full text]
  • Belize), and Distribution in Yucatan
    University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland Institut of Zoology Ecology of the Black Catbird, Melanoptila glabrirostris, at Shipstern Nature Reserve (Belize), and distribution in Yucatan. J.Laesser Annick Morgenthaler May 2003 Master thesis supervised by Prof. Claude Mermod and Dr. Louis-Félix Bersier CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1. Aim and description of the study 2. Geographic setting 2.1. Yucatan peninsula 2.2. Belize 2.3. Shipstern Nature Reserve 2.3.1. History and previous studies 2.3.2. Climate 2.3.3. Geology and soils 2.3.4. Vegetation 2.3.5. Fauna 3. The Black Catbird 3.1. Taxonomy 3.2. Description 3.3. Breeding 3.4. Ecology and biology 3.5. Distribution and threats 3.6. Current protection measures FIRST PART: BIOLOGY, HABITAT AND DENSITY AT SHIPSTERN 4. Materials and methods 4.1. Census 4.1.1. Territory mapping 4.1.2. Transect point-count 4.2. Sizing and ringing 4.3. Nest survey (from hide) 5. Results 5.1. Biology 5.1.1. Morphometry 5.1.2. Nesting 5.1.3. Diet 5.1.4. Competition and predation 5.2. Habitat use and population density 5.2.1. Population density 5.2.2. Habitat use 5.2.3. Banded individuals monitoring 5.2.4. Distribution through the Reserve 6. Discussion 6.1. Biology 6.2. Habitat use and population density SECOND PART: DISTRIBUTION AND HABITATS THROUGHOUT THE RANGE 7. Materials and methods 7.1. Data collection 7.2. Visit to others sites 8. Results 8.1. Data compilation 8.2. Visited places 8.2.1. Corozalito (south of Shipstern lagoon) 8.2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birds (Aves) of Oromia, Ethiopia – an Annotated Checklist
    European Journal of Taxonomy 306: 1–69 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2017.306 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2017 · Gedeon K. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A32EAE51-9051-458A-81DD-8EA921901CDC The birds (Aves) of Oromia, Ethiopia – an annotated checklist Kai GEDEON 1,*, Chemere ZEWDIE 2 & Till TÖPFER 3 1 Saxon Ornithologists’ Society, P.O. Box 1129, 09331 Hohenstein-Ernstthal, Germany. 2 Oromia Forest and Wildlife Enterprise, P.O. Box 1075, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. 3 Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Centre for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 3 Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F46B3F50-41E2-4629-9951-778F69A5BBA2 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F59FEDB3-627A-4D52-A6CB-4F26846C0FC5 3 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:A87BE9B4-8FC6-4E11-8DB4-BDBB3CFBBEAA Abstract. Oromia is the largest National Regional State of Ethiopia. Here we present the first comprehensive checklist of its birds. A total of 804 bird species has been recorded, 601 of them confirmed (443) or assumed (158) to be breeding birds. At least 561 are all-year residents (and 31 more potentially so), at least 73 are Afrotropical migrants and visitors (and 44 more potentially so), and 184 are Palaearctic migrants and visitors (and eight more potentially so). Three species are endemic to Oromia, 18 to Ethiopia and 43 to the Horn of Africa. 170 Oromia bird species are biome restricted: 57 to the Afrotropical Highlands biome, 95 to the Somali-Masai biome, and 18 to the Sudan-Guinea Savanna biome.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade in Andean Condor Vulture Gryphus Feathers and Body Parts in the City of Cusco and the Sacred Valley, Cusco Region, Peru Robert S
    Vulture News 61 September 2011 Trade in Andean Condor Vulture gryphus feathers and body parts in the city of Cusco and the Sacred Valley, Cusco region, Peru Robert S. R. Williams1*, Jose Luis Jara1, Daphne Matsufuiji2 and Anahi Plenge2 1Frankfurt Zoological Society and the Andean Condor Working Group – Peru 2Clorinda Matto de Turner 305, Urb. Magisterio, Cusco, Peru *Corresponding author: [email protected] Summary The sale of Andean Condor feathers and body parts is undertaken openly in the tourist markets of Cusco and the Sacred Valley. This trade is illegal but there is no enforcement of existing legislation. We visited the main tourist markets of the region to ascertain the extent of the trade, reasons motivating it and value. We found condor feathers for sale in 26 establishments. Feathers were sold singly, decorated and incorporated in handicrafts. Prices ranged from 5 soles for a small body feather to 160 soles for a main primary and we found handicrafts for sale at prices of up to 650 soles (featuring 6 feathers). We were offered a whole condor for sale at a market in Cusco for 2,500 soles. Investigations revealed that there are condor hunters working to supply this trade in both the Cordillera Vilcabamba and Cordillera Vilcanota and that the town of Calca is the base of much of the handicraft production. The trade is mainly based on three uses: alternative healing, shamanic ceremonies and souvenirs. It is crucial that the Peruvian authorities honour their commitments under international conventions and act immediately to stop this illegal trade, which is further threatening a species that is already in a precarious situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Recovery Plan for the Sihek Or Guam Micronesian Kingfisher (Halcyon Cinnamomina Cinnamomina)
    DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate actions which the best available science indicates are required to recover and protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Recovery teams serve as independent advisors to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Recovery plans are reviewed by the public and submitted to additional peer review before they are approved and adopted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Nothing in this plan should be construed as a commitment or requirement that any Federal agency obligate or pay funds in contravention of the Anti-Deficiency Act, 31 USC 1341, or any other law or regulation. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Recovery plans represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed as approved by the Regional Director or Director. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery actions. Please check for updates or revisions at the website addresses provided below before using this plan. Literature citation of this document should read as follows: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Discover California State Parks in the Monterey Area
    Crashing waves, redwoods and historic sites Discover California State Parks in the Monterey Area Some of the most beautiful sights in California can be found in Monterey area California State Parks. Rocky cliffs, crashing waves, redwood trees, and historic sites are within an easy drive of each other. "When you look at the diversity of state parks within the Monterey District area, you begin to realize that there is something for everyone - recreational activities, scenic beauty, natural and cultural history sites, and educational programs,” said Dave Schaechtele, State Parks Monterey District Public Information Officer. “There are great places to have fun with families and friends, and peaceful and inspirational settings that are sure to bring out the poet, writer, photographer, or artist in you. Some people return to their favorite state parks, year-after-year, while others venture out and discover some new and wonderful places that are then added to their 'favorites' list." State Parks in the area include: Limekiln State Park, 54 miles south of Carmel off Highway One and two miles south of the town of Lucia, features vistas of the Big Sur coast, redwoods, and the remains of historic limekilns. The Rockland Lime and Lumber Company built these rock and steel furnaces in 1887 to cook the limestone mined from the canyon walls. The 711-acre park allows visitors an opportunity to enjoy the atmosphere of Big Sur’s southern coast. The park has the only safe access to the shoreline along this section of cast. For reservations at the park’s 36 campsites, call ReserveAmerica at (800) 444- PARK (7275).
    [Show full text]
  • The Andean Condor: a Field Study ______
    _____________________________________ THE ANDEAN CONDOR: A FIELD STUDY _____________________________________ By: Jerry McGahan Box 71 Arlee, MT 59821 (406) 726-3480 [email protected] JerryMcGahan.com With photographs, field, and clerical assistance by: Libby Sale Dedicated to the Memory of Carlos Lehmann V Maria Koepcke Enrique Avila William Millie i Table of Contents PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDMENTS……………………………………………………… 1 1 THE STUDY .............................................................................................................................. 6 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 6 STUDY AREAS .............................................................................................................. 15 Colombia .............................................................................................................. 15 Cerro Illescas ....................................................................................................... 18 Paracas ................................................................................................................ 20 THE SUBJECT ................................................................................................................ 21 Taxonomy ............................................................................................................. 21 Description ........................................................................................................... 22
    [Show full text]
  • Malleefowl Facts Dec2016 FINAL
    Fauna facts Get to know Western Australia’s fauna Mal leefowl What is a malleefowl? A malleefowl is a bird about the size of a large chicken that lives on the ground and rarely flies. They make nests on the ground, called malleefowl mounds, by heaping together a large mound of soil over a pile of leaves and sticks. Photo: Nye Evans Scientific Name: Leipoa ocellata What do they look and sound like? Other Common Names: gnow, nganamara, lowan, They can be very hard to spot because they native pheasant, incubator or thermometer bird camouflage so well with their natural environment. The wing feathers are grey, black Conservation Status: Vulnerable and white, the belly is creamy, and the neck Threats: vegetation clearing, feral cat and fox and head are grey. predation, fire, road mortality and competition for Malleefowl will often freeze or move quietly food and habitat with sheep, rabbits, cattle and goats. away when disturbed. The male malleefowl Distribution: Semi-arid Mallee ( Eucalyptus ) makes a deep bellowing or loud clucks, while shrublands and woodlands across southern Australia the female makes a high-pitched crowing, soft crooning or low grunting noise. Interesting facts The scientific name means ‘eyelet egg-leaver’ because they have a white ring around their eyes and they bury their eggs in the mound. Malleefowl use their beaks to check the temperature inside the mound, which is why they are also known as thermometer birds and incubator birds. Malleefowl mounds can be as big as 1 metre high and 5 metres wide. Have you seen a malleefowl? The female lays up to 35 eggs and buries them Please tell us if you have seen a malleefowl or inside the nest.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Diversity Mediates Macroecological Variation in Plant–Hummingbird Interaction Networks
    Received: 21 June 2017 | Revised: 13 May 2018 | Accepted: 22 May 2018 DOI: 10.1111/geb.12776 RESEARCH PAPER Functional diversity mediates macroecological variation in plant–hummingbird interaction networks Pietro Kiyoshi Maruyama1,2,3 | Jesper Sonne2 | Jeferson Vizentin‐Bugoni4,5 | Ana M. Martín González2 | Thais B. Zanata2,6 | Stefan Abrahamczyk7 | Ruben Alarcón8 | Andréa C. Araujo9 | Francielle P. Araújo10 | Andrea C. Baquero2 | Edgar Chávez‐González11 | Aline G. Coelho12 | Peter A. Cotton13 | D. Matthias Dehling14,15 | Erich Fischer9 | Glauco Kohler16 | Carlos Lara17 | Flor Maria G. Las‐Casas18 | Adriana O. Machado3 | Caio G. Machado12 | María A. Maglianesi14,19 | Tiago S. Malucelli6 | Oscar Humberto Marín‐Gómez20 | Paulo E. Oliveira3 | Juan Francisco Ornelas21 | Raul Ortiz‐Pulido22 | Mónica B. Ramírez‐Burbano23 | Márcia A. Rocca24 | Licléia C. Rodrigues25 | Liliana Rosero‐Lasprilla26 | Ana M. Rui27 | Brody Sandel28 | Jens‐Christian Svenning29,30 | Boris A. Tinoco31 | Isabela G. Varassin6 | Stella Watts32 | Carsten Rahbek2,33 | Marlies Sazima1 | Matthias Schleuning14 | Bo Dalsgaard2 1Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, Brasil 2Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark 3Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brasil 4Programa de Pós‐Graduação em Ecologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, Brasil 5Natural Resources and Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • References and Appendices
    References Ainley, D.G., S.G. Allen, and L.B. Spear. 1995. Off- Arnold, R.A. 1983. Ecological studies on six endan- shore occurrence patterns of marbled murrelets gered butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): in central California. In: C.J. Ralph, G.L. Hunt island biogeography, patch dynamics, and the Jr., M.G. Raphael, and J.F. Piatt, technical edi- design of habitat preserves. University of Cali- tors. Ecology and Conservation of the Marbled fornia Publications in Entomology 99: 1–161. Murrelet. USDA Forest Service, General Techni- Atwood, J.L. 1993. California gnatcatchers and coastal cal Report PSW-152; 361–369. sage scrub: the biological basis for endangered Allen, C.R., R.S. Lutz, S. Demairais. 1995. Red im- species listing. In: J.E. Keeley, editor. Interface ported fire ant impacts on Northern Bobwhite between ecology and land development in Cali- populations. Ecological Applications 5: 632-638. fornia. Southern California Academy of Sciences, Allen, E.B., P.E. Padgett, A. Bytnerowicz, and R.A. Los Angeles; 149–169. Minnich. 1999. Nitrogen deposition effects on Atwood, J.L., P. Bloom, D. Murphy, R. Fisher, T. Scott, coastal sage vegetation of southern California. In T. Smith, R. Wills, P. Zedler. 1996. Principles of A. Bytnerowicz, M.J. Arbaugh, and S. Schilling, reserve design and species conservation for the tech. coords. Proceedings of the international sym- southern Orange County NCCP (Draft of Oc- posium on air pollution and climate change effects tober 21, 1996). Unpublished manuscript. on forest ecosystems, February 5–9, 1996, River- Austin, M. 1903. The Land of Little Rain. University side, CA.
    [Show full text]