DOCSLIB.ORG

Report on National Assembly's Work in the Parliamentary Term 2011 - 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report on National Assembly's Work in the Parliamentary Term 2011 - 2014 REPORT ON NATIONAL ASSEMBLY'S WORK IN THE PARLIAMENTARY TERM 2011 - 2014 REPORT ON NATIONAL ASSEMBLY'S WORK IN THE PARLIAMENTARY TERM 2011–2014 October 2014 REPORT ON NATIONAL ASSEMBLY'S WORK IN THE PARLIAMENTARY TERM 2011 - 2014 Collection: Library collection of the National Assembly published by the Public Relations Office Editor: Karmen Uglešić Data gathering and processing: Staff of the Research and Documentation Division (edited by Igor Zobavnik and Andrej Eror) Front cover photo: Borut Peršolja Front cover design: Martina Čuk Translation: Nina Barlič, Sandra Kos Cerar Publisher: National Assembly, Ljubljana, Šubičeva 4 Phone: +386 1 478 94 00 Production: Public Relations Office UDC: http://www.dz-rs.si/wps/portal/Home/deloDZ/Publikacije/PorocilaDZ The first page of the publication features the sculpture of Wrestling Boys, work by sculptor France Kralj dating from 1942, which is on display in the lobby of the Large Hall of the National Assembly. 2 INTRODUCTORY WORDS BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY JANKO VEBER Ladies and gentlemen, As I look back at this term and try to roughly evaluate it, I could say that this was an indeed challenging and certainly a varied period which, just like its predecessor, unfortunately came to an early end. I see the main reasons for such in the different views and attempts to serve individual interests as regards privatisation, in the consequences of the global economic and financial crisis and the related adoption of several unpopular measures which touched upon us all, in certain findings in the field of the prevention of corruption, as well as in the frictions within the largest coalition party and its recent break-up. Also the statistics of activities show that the past, i.e. 6th parliamentary term of the National Assembly, was indeed a varied one. Let me just mention a few: the National Assembly held 95 sessions, 25 regular and 70 extraordinary, which together lasted 194 days. Regular sessions lasted 104 days and extraordinary sessions 90 days. Numerous parliamentary questions and motions were presented and deputies diligently tabled them all until the expiry of the term. 702 agenda items were discussed and 345 laws were adopted, with laws amending other laws being the most frequent. There were only 46 new or, so to speak, renewed laws. I would like to highlight that, compared to the previous terms, this last term was particularly marked by the adoption of two important amendments to the Constitution and the ratification of Croatia's accession agreement with the European Union. Undoubtedly, the procedure to adopt those three acts was highly challenging – after all, a two-third majority of all deputies was required for these acts to be adopted. The adopted constitutional amendments – the inclusion of the fiscal rule in the Constitution and the changed referendum arrangement – should also be followed by two implementing acts for the adoption of which a two-third majority is required as well, but sadly they have not been prepared so far, nor submitted to the National Assembly for discussion. Nevertheless, the objectives of the fiscal rule are being pursued in practice and the constitutional amendment concerning the referendum is also already in force: on 8 June 2014, at the request of 4,000 voters, the first referendum was held in line with the adopted amendments (the only one so far) which, in comparison to the previous arrangement, bring significantly stringent requirements as regards the initiative, the admissibility of the referendum, and the conditions for the success of the referendum. A particular feature of this National Assembly's term was also a strong public interest to tackle the situation in Slovenia. Thus, a total of 15 proposals of popular initiative to adopt a law were submitted; based thereon, seven draft laws were tabled. It might be interesting to read that in the previous term there was no such case. The turbulence of the 2011–2014 parliamentary term also reflects the perspective on the submitted interpellations, resignations, votes of confidence and no confidence in the Government, dismissals of ministers and the announced impeachments. Seven interpellations concerning the work and accountability of ministers were filed: none of them was successful, but as many as six ministers resigned for various reasons. Mention needs to be made also of the several rounds of voting for the President of the National Assembly, with which we started this parliamentary term, and the numerous attempts at forming a Government. The unsuccessful attempt of forming a Government by the relative winner of the early elections of 4 December 2011 later reflected in the Government being formed by the party which only received the second highest number of votes in the elections. 3 Later on, Gregor Virant resigned in protest from the office of President of the National Assembly as a result of the report of the Commission for the Prevention of Corruption weighing upon the President of the two largest parties. This was followed by a constructive vote of no confidence in the then President of the Government Janez Janša in February 2013 and the consequent appointment of Alenka Bratušek as the new President, marking also the first time a woman was elected to such high-level position. At the end of the year, Alenka Bratušek requested that a vote of confidence in the Government which she tied on the adoption of the budgets for 2014 and 2015 be held at the National Assembly. And in May 2014, as the National Assembly took note of her resignation, it was already clear that we were heading to yet another early election. Personally, I regret that the legally provided possibilities and procedures as regards drafting the proposal for a new formateur in such situations were not thought through and coincided with the summer recess. Moreover, the Council of the President of the National Assembly met a total of 105 times and three commissions of inquiry were established. Unfortunately, despite my efforts and the consensus of all deputy groups, we were not able to establish a Committee on Future which, following the model and practice of other countries and in cooperation with experts in individual fields, would discuss issues and views of the modern development of Slovenia and give concrete proposals to parliamentary working bodies. However, I hope that this initiative will come to life in the future. Let me conclude by stressing that there was very good cooperation between the National Assembly and the President of the Republic and other state bodies. Likewise, I believe that the cooperation between the National Assembly and the Government was at the level of previous parliamentary terms. Let me also mention that during this term I wished to open a discussion also on how to improve the communication on issues concerning the functioning of Slovenia within the European Union, since the current Act on Cooperation between the National Assembly and the Government regarding affairs pertaining to the functioning of Slovenia within the EU, does not provide for the National Assembly to adopt or co-create the reform programme which the Government submits to Brussels. Therefore, I believe this to be one of the subjects that ought to be open in the future, giving more power to the National Assembly. I wish the new, already seventh National Assembly, much wisdom and well-considered decisions. Janko Veber President of the National Assembly 4 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION – EXPLANATION OF METHOD AND CONTENTS .......................................... 8 2 GENERAL INFORMATION .........................................................................................................10 2.1 Deputies of the National Assembly in the parliamentary term 2011–2014 ....................... 10 2.2 Deputy groups ...................................................................................................................... 15 2.3 The structure of deputies ..................................................................................................... 16 2.4 Leading officials of the National Assembly ........................................................................ 18 2.5 Deputy offices ....................................................................................................................... 18 2.6 Ratio coalition–opposition, deputies of the Italian and Hungarian national communities, unaffiliated deputies ................................................................................................................... 18 3 SESSIONS OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY .............................................................................20 3.1 Sessions of the National Assembly ..................................................................................... 20 3.2 Adjournments and obstructions .......................................................................................... 22 3.3 Draft and adopted laws and other acts ............................................................................... 23 3.3.1 Adopted laws and other acts .........................................................................................23 3.3.2 Draft and adopted laws by proposer ..............................................................................25 3.3.3 Adopted laws by type of legislative procedure ...............................................................26 3.3.4 Details concerning the regular legislative procedure .....................................................28 3.4 Amendments ........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Slovenia Before the Elections
    PERSPECTIVE Realignment of the party system – Slovenia before the elections ALEŠ MAVER AND UROŠ URBAS November 2011 The coalition government under Social Democrat Prime make people redundant. Nevertheless, the unemploy- Minister Borut Pahor lost the support it needed in Parlia- ment rate increased by 75 per cent to 107,000 over three ment and early elections had to be called for 4 Decem- years. This policy was financed by loans of 8 billion eu- ber, one year before completing its term of office. What ros, which doubled the public deficit. are the reasons for this development? Which parties are now seeking votes in the »political marketplace«? What However, Prime Minister Pahor overestimated his popu- coalitions are possible after 4 December? And what chal- larity in a situation in which everybody hoped that the lenges will the new government face? economic crisis would soon be over. The governing par- ties had completely different priorities: they were seek- ing economic rents; they could not resist the pressure of Why did the government of lobbies and made concessions; and they were too preoc- Prime Minister Borut Pahor fail? cupied with scandals and other affairs emerging from the ranks of the governing coalition. Although the governing coalition was homogeneously left-wing, it could not work together and registered no significant achievements. The next government will thus Electoral history and development be compelled to achieve something. Due to the deterio- of the party system rating economic situation – for 2012 1 per cent GDP growth, 1.3 per cent inflation, 8.4 per cent unemploy- Since the re-introduction of the multi-party system Slo- ment and a 5.3 per cent budget deficit are predicted – venia has held general elections in 1990, 1992, 1996, the goals will be economic.
    [Show full text]
  • Spotlight on Parliaments in Europe
    Spotlight on Parliaments in Europe Issued by the EP Directorate for Relations with National Parliaments N° 13 - November 2016 Quality of legislation stemming from the EU On 19 September 2016, the Italian Senate submitted a request to the ECPRD network concerning the quality of legislation stemming from the EU. This request was an opportunity for National Parliaments to exchange best practices on how to ensure the quality of legislation with specific regard to transposition, implementation and enforcement of EU law. From the 21 answers provided by National Parliaments it is clear that transposition and implementation of EU Law is highly unlikely to require special attention. While almost all of them are using legislative guidelines and procedures for guaranteeing high standard of general law-making, only a few have felt the need to establish special mechanisms to ensure the quality of legislation stemming from the EU. The use of legislative guidelines and procedures; the main way to ensure the quality of legislation stemming from the EU. The use of legislative guidelines and procedures appears to be the most common way for National Parliaments to ensure the quality of legislation, also the legislation stemming from the EU. It allows for good linguistic coherence in the national languages while enhancing the standardization of the law. For example, in the case of Austria, the Federal Chancellery has published specific “Legistische Richtlinien”. In Spain, the instrument used is the Regulation Guidelines adopted in the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 22 July 2005. Both Italian Chambers use Joint Guidelines on drafting of national legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Oireachtas Digest on Europe Week 29: 19 to 25 July 2021 | Ref: 28-21
    Oireachtas Digest on Europe Week 29: 19 to 25 July 2021 | Ref: 28-21 Spotlight Last Week European Parliament: EU’s capacity to anticipate and respond to health crises. The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (ENVI) adopted a draft negotiating position for a new regulation on tackling serious cross-border health threats. The text will be voted by all MEPs during September’s plenary session. Independent Ethics Body: In a report endorsed by the Constitutional Affairs Committee on Wednesday, MEPs set out their views on the establishment of an independent EU Ethics Body. New EU strategy for China In a report adopted on Thursday, the Foreign Affairs Committee outlines six pillars on which the EU should build a new strategy to deal with China: cooperation on global challenges, engagement on international norms and human rights, identifying risks and vulnerabilities, building partnerships with like-minded partners, fostering strategic autonomy and defending European interests and values. Kremlin politics: In a new assessment of the direction of EU-Russia political relations, MEPs make clear the Parliament distinguishes between the Russian people and President Vladimir Putin’s regime. The latter is, they say, a “stagnating authoritarian kleptocracy led by a president-for-life surrounded by a circle of oligarchs”. Slovenian Presidency.Slovenia holds the Presidency of the Council until the end of 2021. During the week, Ministers outlined the priorities of the Slovenian Presidency of the Council of the EU to parliamentary committees, in a series of meetings. Data governance: On Thursday, the Industry, Research and Energy Committee adopted its position on the EU Data Governance Act (DGA), aimed at increasing trust in data sharing, create new EU rules on neutrality of data marketplaces and facilitate the reuse of certain data held by the public sector e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • General Election in Slovenia
    GENERAL ELECTIONS IN SLOVENIA 4th December 2011 European Elections monitor The Rightwing Opposition Forces forecast to win in the Slovenian General Elections on from Corinne Deloy translated by Helen Levy 4th December next. ANALYSIS On 4th December next Slovenia will be holding the first early general elections in its history. 1 month before This election follows parliament’s rejection on 20th September last of the confidence motion the poll presented by Borut Pahor’s government (Social Democratic Party, SD). 51 MPs of the Demo- cratic Party (SDS), the People’s Party (SLS), the Slovenian National Party (SNS), Zares (Z) and of the Democratic Pensioners’ Party (DeSUS) voted against the text, 36 members of the Social Democratic Party and of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDS) as well as three independent MPs voted in support. The Slovenian Parliament was dissolved on 21st October. Borut Pahor is the third Slovenian head of government to fall after Alojz Peterle (Slovenian Christian-Democrats) in 1992 and Janez Drnovsek (LDS) in 2000. After the announcement of the government’s collapse, President of the Republic, Danilo Türk left New York where he was attending the UN’s General Assembly to return to Ljubljana. “The vote of defiance has worsened the political crisis,” he declared, calling on all political parties to show courage rapidly in order to find solutions to the crisis in the interest of the Slovenian people. “The vote of defiance is good news because it will lead to a new government that will have wider public support, which is vital if the necessary decisions are to be taken,” declared Janez Sustarsic, professor at the Faculty of Management in Koper.
    [Show full text]
  • The Slovenian Parliament and EU Affairs Sabina Kajnč Lange, European Institute of Public Administration
    OPAL Country Reports The Slovenian Parliament and EU Affairs Sabina Kajnč Lange, European Institute of Public Administration To cite this report: S. Kajnč Lange (2012), OPAL Country Reports: The Slovenian Parliament and EU Affairs, weblink September 2012 OPAL Country Report on the Slovenian Parliament, September 2012 OPAL Country Report on the Slovenian Parliament1 Sabina Lange, European Institute of Public Administration Acronyms: CFP Odbor za zunanjo politiko - Committee for foreign policy EAC Odbor za zadeve Evropske unije, Committee on EU Affairs (CEUA) LRNAG Zakon o odnosih med državnim zborom in vlado v zadevah Evropske unije (Law on Relations between the National Assembly and the Government in matters of the European Union) SI Slovenia RoP Rules of Procedure RoPNA Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly 1. General Position of Parliament in the Constitutional Balance of the Member State: Constitutional and institutional factors This section looks at the role of Parliament in the political system, to help us understand the relative power position of the legislature. What is the type of government in the political system of your member state? 1.1 (i.e. parliamentary or semi-presidential) Parliamentary system 1.2 Is it a uni- or bicameral Parliament? If bicameral, is one house dominant or are both equally strong? Please briefly explain. Bicameral, with Lower house (državni zbor; national assembly, Staatsversammlung) very dominant over the Upper house (državni svet; national council; Staatsrat). Upper house combines interest and regional representation. 1.3 Is the state federal, decentralized or unitary? If applicable, is it a form of assymetrical federalism? Unitary 1.4 Briefly describe the electoral system, if applicable, for each chamber.
    [Show full text]
  • Act on the Protection of the Right to a Trial Without Undue Delay of the Republic of Slovenia
    Župan čičeva 3, 1000 Ljubljana T: +386 1 369 52 00 F: +386 1 369 57 83 E: [email protected] www.mp.gov.si ACT ON THE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHT TO A TRIAL WITHOUT UNDUE DELAY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA 2 OCTOBER 2013 Disclaimer : The English language translation of the of the unofficially consolidated text of the Act on the Protection of the Right to a Trial without Undue Delay (of the Republic of Slovenia) below is provided just for information only and confers no rights nor imposes any obligations on anyone. Only the official publication of the Act on the Protection of the Right to a Trial without Undue Delay in Slovene language, as published and promulgated in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, is authentic. The status of the translated text of the Act on the Protection of the Right to a Trial without Undue Delay is as of 2 October 2013 and the status of statutes in footnotes is also as of 2 October 2013. Explanatory footnotes have also been prepared just for information only, and previous text of this Disclaimer also applies to them. While the Government Translation Service prepared the original translation of major part of this Act, the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Slovenia performed the substantially corrected translation, terminology decisions and annotations. This translation may not be published in any way, without the prior permission of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Slovenia, but may be used for information purposes only. ACT ON THE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHT TO A TRIAL WITHOUT UNDUE DELAY 1 (ZVPSBNO) 2 Chapter 1 General provisions Purpose and scope of the Act Article 1 (1) The purpose of this Act shall be to protect the right to a trial without undue delay.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads/Europas-Vergessene-Krise-P4417.H Tml
    VOLUME 10, NUMBER 1, JANUARY 2017 COHESIVE EUROPE OR CORE-PERIPHERY DIVIDE IN THE EU28: THE REGIONAL CHALLENGE OF DUAL CRISIS IN THE NEW MEMBER STATES Attila AGH ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… POLITICAL LEADERSHIP IN TIMES OF CRISES – THEORIES AND MODELS WORTHY FOR OUR CHANGING WORLD Aleksandar DIMITROV ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... ELECTRONIC VOTING IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE: STATUS QUO IN ESTONIA AND TRENDS IN CENTRAL EUROPE Markus REINERS ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... PARLIAMENTARY LEADERSHIP – PROBLEMS, DILEMMAS AND OPPORTUNITIES OF LEGISLATIVE LEADERS: THE CASE OF SLOVENIA Drago ZAJC ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... COMMUNAL POLITICAL MOBILIZATION: THE NEED TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN MINORITY AND MAJORITY PARTIES Agnes K. KOOS and Kenneth KEULMAN ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... BOOK REVIEW: “FROZEN CONFLICTS” IN EUROPE Jerzy J. WIATR ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE POLITICS 2 EDITORIAL TEAM General Editor General Editor Miro Haček Peter Csányi ................................................................. ................................................................ University of Ljubljana Alexander Dubč ek University Trenčin Faculty of social sciences, CAAPPI Department of Political Science Kardeljeva ploščad 5 Študentská 2 1000 Ljub ljana , S lovenia 911 50 Trenčin, Slovakia [email protected] [email protected] General Editor Assistant Editor Jurij Toplak Simona Kukovič .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • P O R O Č I L O O Izidu Predčasnih Volitev Poslancev V Državni Zbor
    REPUBLIKA SLOVENIJA DRŽAVNA VOLILNA KOMISIJA P O R O Č I L O o izidu predčasnih volitev poslancev v državni zbor Na podlagi 37. člena Zakona o volitvah v državni zbor (Uradni list RS, št. 109/06 – ZVDZ-UPB in 54/07 – odločba US; v nadaljevanju ZVDZ) je Državna volilna komisija (v nadaljevanju: DVK) na 78. seji dne 16. decembra 2011 u g o t o v i l a : PRVI DEL VOLITVE 88 POSLANCEV DRŽAVNEGA ZBORA, KI SE VOLIJO NA PODLAGI SPLOŠNE VOLILNE PRAVICE I. 1. Na predčasnih volitvah 4. decembra 2011 je imelo pravico voliti 88 poslancev državnega zbora, ki se volijo na podlagi splošne volilne pravice, 1.709.692 volivcev, pri čemer je bilo 1.709.654 volivcev, ki so bili vpisani v volilne imenike ter 38 volivcev, ki so glasovali s potrdilom pristojnega organa, ker pomotoma niso bili vpisani v volilni imenik. 2. Na podlagi splošne volilne pravice je glasovalo skupaj 1.121.573 volivcev ali 65,60 % od vseh volivcev, ki so imeli pravico voliti. 3. Od števila volivcev, ki so glasovali, je 38 volivcev glasovalo s potrdili, ostali so bili vpisani v volilne imenike. 4. Po pošti je glasovalo 9.269 volivcev. 5. Za izvolitev 88 poslancev državnega zbora, ki se jih izvoli na podlagi splošne volilne pravice, je bilo oddanih 1.121.475 glasovnic. 6. Ker so bile prazne oziroma volja volivca ni bila jasno izražena, je bilo neveljavnih 19.219 glasovnic (1,71 % od oddanih glasovnic). 7. Veljavnih je bilo 1.102.256 glasovnic. II. Posamezne liste kandidatov so dobile naslednje število glasov: Lista Glasov % 1 AKACIJE 212 0,02% 2 DEMOKRATIČNA STRANKA DELA - DSD 7.118 0,65%
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL RECORDS / NATIONAL BESTS 4 X 200 Metres / 4 X 800 Metres / Distance Medley Relay / 4 X 1.500 Metres / 4 X 400 Metres Mixed Relay
    NATIONAL RECORDS / NATIONAL BESTS 4 x 200 metres / 4 x 800 metres / Distance Medley Relay / 4 x 1.500 metres / 4 x 400 metres mixed relay Compiled by Miguel Villaseñor AEEA (Asociación Española de Estadísticos de Atletismo) member AEEA web page: http://www.rfea.es/aeea/index.asp Corrections and additions to [email protected] Twitter: @MigVillasenor With thanks to Manuel Arons de Carvalho (POR), Alain Bouillé (FRA), Marco Buccellato (ITA), Aliaksandr But-Husaim (BLR), Mark Butler (GBR), Thomas Constas (GRE), György Csiki (HUN), Gerard Dupuy (FRA), David Eiger (ISR), José Javier Etayo (ESP), Carole Fuchs (FRA), Arild Glemme (NOR), Karl Graf (AUT), Matti Hannus (FIN), Jonas Hedman (SWE), José Luis Hernández (ESP), Heinrich Hubbeling (GER), Richard Hymans (GBR), Juhani Jalava (FIN), Paul Jenes (AUS), Zbigniew Jonik (POL), Alfonz Juck (SVK), Ozren Karamata (SRB), Georges Klepper (LUX), Peter Larsson (SWE), Raul Leoni (ITA), Børre Lilloe (NOR), Bernard Linley (TTO), Rooney Magnusson (SWE), Crisanto Martín (ESP), Marco Martini (ITA), Peter Matthews (GBR), Stuart Mazdon (GBR), Giuseppe Mazza (ITA), Steponas Misiunas (LTU), Michel Nazé (FRA), Tony O'Donoghue (IRL), Luis Pineda (MEX), Arisnel Rodríguez (DOM), Enzo Sabaddin (ITA), Tatsumi Senda (JPN), Andris Stagis (LAT), Marcelo Szwarcfiter (URU), Sergey Tikhonov (RUS), Milan Urban (CZE), Alexander Vangelov (BUL), Luis Vinker (ARG) and Jad Adrian Washif (MAS). Updated 17 April 2017 Notes: Some performances are national best marks and they has not been ratified as national records.
    [Show full text]
  • Milan Brglez • Dolo#Itev Dnevnega Reda • Milan Brglez • 2
    1 O zapisniku seje Državni zbor Republike Slovenije 7. mandat (2014-2018) 1. izredna seja 25. 8. 2014 Dnevni red • Pred dnevnim redom • Milan Brglez • dolo#itev dnevnega reda • Milan Brglez • 2. TO#KO DNEVNEGA REDA – VOLITVE PODPREDSEDNIKOV DRŽAVNEGA ZBORA. • Milan Brglez • Dejan Židan • Milan Brglez • Franc Jurša • Milan Brglez • Simona Kustec Lipicer • Milan Brglez • Karl Viktor Erjavec • Milan Brglez • Matej Tašner Vatovec • Milan Brglez • Matej Tonin • Milan Brglez • Prehajamo na obravnavo prekinjene 2. to#ke, to je na Volitve podpredsednikov Državnega zbora. • Milan Brglez • 1. TO#KO DNEVNEGA REDA, TO JE NA OBRAVNAVO PREDLOGA ZA IZVOLITEV PREDSEDNIKA VLADE REPUBLIKE SLOVENIJE. • Milan Brglez • Miro Cerar • Milan Brglez • Janez Ivan Janša • Milan Brglez • Karl Viktor Erjavec 2 • Milan Brglez • Matjaž Han • Milan Brglez • Luka Mesec • Milan Brglez • Ljudmila Novak • Milan Brglez • Jani Janko Möderndorfer • Milan Brglez • László Göncz • Milan Brglez • Simona Kustec Lipicer • Milan Brglez • Tomaž Gantar • Janko Veber • Matej Tašner Vatovec • Janko Veber • Matej Tonin • Janko Veber • Igor Zor#i# • Janko Veber • Branko Grims • Janko Veber • Marjana Kotnik Poropat • Janko Veber • Branko Zorman • Janko Veber • Andrej Šircelj • Janko Veber • Iva Dimic • Janko Veber • Janja Sluga • Janko Veber • Eva Irgl • Janko Veber • Uroš Prikl • Janko Veber • Jasna Murgel • Janko Veber • Klavdija Markež • Janko Veber • Margareta Gu#ek Zakošek • Janko Veber • Franc Breznik 3 • Janko Veber • Vesna Vervega • Janko Veber • Ana Bah Žibert • Janko Veber • Irena
    [Show full text]
  • The Far Right in Slovenia
    MASARYK UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF SOCIAL STUDIES DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE The Far Right in Slovenia Master‟s thesis Bc. Lucie Chládková Supervisor: doc. JUDr. PhDr. Miroslav Mareš, Ph.D. UČO: 333105 Field of Study: Security and Strategic Studies Matriculation Year: 2012 Brno 2014 Declaration of authorship of the thesis Hereby I confirm that this master‟s thesis “The Far Right in Slovenia” is an outcome of my own elaboration and work and I used only sources here mentioned. Brno, 10 May 2014 ……………………………………… Lucie Chládková 2 Acknowledgments I would like to express my gratitude to doc. JUDr. PhDr. Miroslav Mareš, Ph.D., who supervised this thesis and contributed with a lot of valuable remarks and advice. I would like to also thank to all respondents from interviews for their help and information they shared with me. 3 Annotation This master‟s thesis deals with the far right in Slovenia after 1991 until today. The main aim of this case study is the description and analysis of far-right political parties, informal and formal organisations and subcultures. Special emphasis is put on the organisational structure of the far-right scene and on the ideological affiliation of individual far-right organisations. Keywords far right, Slovenia, political party, organisation, ideology, nationalism, extremism, Blood and Honour, patriotic, neo-Nazi, populism. 4 Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 7 2. Methodology .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • As at February 28, 2017) Compiled by György Csiki / ATFS
    NATIONAL INDOOR RECORDS OF EUROPEAN COUNTRIES (As at February 28, 2017) Compiled by György Csiki / ATFS + = enroute to longer distance; A = high altitude; y = 220y or 440y distance MEN 60 Metres ALB 6.77 Arben Maka Torino 10 Feb 01 AND 7.01 Estéve Martin Escaldes 04 Mar 00 ARM 6.93 Arman Andreasyan Paris 05 Mar 11 AUT* 6.56 Andreas Berger Wien 27 Feb 88 6.56 Andreas Berger Den Haag 18 Feb 89 AZE 6.61 Aleksandr Kornelyuk Göteborg 09 Mar 74 BEL 6.56 Ronald Desruelles Maastricht 10 Feb 85 6.56 Ronald Desruelles Sindelfingen 05 Feb 88 BIH 6.94 Ilija Cvijetic Paris 05 Mar 11 BLR 6.60 Maksim Lynsha Mogilyov 15 Feb 08 BUL 6.58 Petar Petrov Sofia 25 Feb 78 CRO 6.63 Dejan Vojnovic Linz 07 Mar 03 CYP 6.58 Yiannakis Zisimides Pireás 03 Mar 96 CZE 6.58 Frantisek Ptácník Liévin 21 Feb 87 DEN 6.65 Benjamin Hecht Malmö 20 Feb 99 6.65 Kristoffer Hari Skive 19 Feb 17 ESP 6.55 Angel David Rodriguez Düsseldorf 08 Feb 13 6.3 Pedro Pablo Nolet Oviedo 15 Jan 00 EST 6.71 Argo Golberg Tallinn 22 Feb 03 6.4 Enn Lilienthal Moskva 03 Feb 88 FIN 6.58 Markus Pöyhönen Helsinki 04 Mar 03 6.58 Markus Pöyhönen Birmingham 14 Mar 03 FRA 6.45 Ronald Pognon Karlsruhe 13 Feb 05 GBR 6.42 Dwain Chambers Torino 07 Mar 09 GEO 6.71 Besik Gotsiridze Moskva 05 Feb 86 GER 6.52 Julian Reus Leipzig 27 Feb 16 GIB 7.16 Jerai Torres Manchester 29 Jan 17 GRE 6.50 Haris Papadiás Paris 07 Mar 97 HUN 6.54 Gábor Dobos Chemnitz 18 Feb 00 IRL 6.61 Paul Hession Birmingham 03 Mar 07 ISL 6.80 Einar Thór Einarsson Malmö 06 Feb 93 6.5 Bjarni Thór Traustason Reykjavík 15 Mar 97 ISR 6.68 Alex Porkhomovskiy
    [Show full text]