DOCSLIB.ORG

Review of Basic Severe Thunderstorm & Tornado Spotting Concepts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Review of Basic Severe Thunderstorm & Tornado Spotting Concepts Review of Basic Severe Thunderstorm & Tornado Spotting Concepts Jim Allsopp National Weather Service Chicago/Romeoville, IL Why Do We Need Spotters? • Radar has limitations, only spotters can provide view into what’s really happening • Spotter reports are used to verify warnings, which helps forecasters improve warning skills • Reports are disseminated to media, EMs, other spotters, public • Spotter reports can help elicit proper response • Spotter reports are a vital ingredient in the Warning Decision Making Process Warning Decision Making Process NWS Warning Forecaster NWS Doppler Radar Data Spotter Reports Warning Issued Weather Observations Before you go out spotting… Have An Idea What To Expect • Utilize NWS products (AFD, HWO, radar) to brief yourself on expected hazards and magnitude of threat • Hazardous Weather Outlook (HWO): one stop shopping for all forecasted hazardous weather for next 7 days. • HWO is updated at approximately: ‐ 430 AM, 1100 AM, 430 PM ‐ when forecast changes from previous HWO Have An Idea What To Expect Under “Current Hazards” menu “Outlooks” Have An Idea What To Expect Latest “HWO” from NWS Chicago National Severe Weather Forecasts from SPC National Rainfall Forecasts from HPC Thunderstorm Basics Thunderstorm Lifecycle Cumulus Stage Mature Stage Dissipating Stage Updrafts & Downdrafts Updrafts Downdrafts • area where warm, moist • area where rain‐cooled air feeds in and rises up air is moving down and into the storm out from storm • identified by dark, rain • area often identifiable by free base of storm heavy rain (possible hail) falling • wall cloud (if storm has one) located in this area • heavy rain/hail have murky appearance in distance Updrafts & Downdrafts Updraft & Rain Free Base Wall Cloud Updrafts & Downdrafts Downdraft & Heavy Rain/Hail Updrafts With Rain Free Base Audience Review Question Is that area highlighted updraft or downdraft? Thunderstorm Types Single Cell (Pulse) Storms • most common during summer • occur when wind shear is weak • typically last 30‐60 mins • minimal severe threat – very localized wind damage or hail, if anything Thunderstorm Types Multicell Storms • most common spring through early autumn • usually occur with moderate wind shear • can lasts hours to more than a day Thunderstorm Types Multicell Storms • includes squall lines • can lasts hours to more than a day • most common threats: – damaging winds – marginally severe hail – heavy rainfall Thunderstorm Types Squall Lines • most common multicell type storm • many squall lines have shelf clouds along leading edge • worst is first with squall lines, wind then heavy rain Squall Lines The shelf cloud is the visual clue to squall lines Movement Outflow and downdraft Squall Line Tornadoes • Rare, usually brief, narrow • May be embedded in rain or may form just ahead of, and then get overtaken by downburst hookHook • Challenging to spot Rotational couplet August 4, 2008 near Griffith, IN Thunderstorm Types Supercell Storms • rarest type, potentially most dangerous • have a rotating updraft (mesocyclone) • most common spring & early summer Thunderstorm Types Supercell Storms • can last for many hours • threats include: – tornadoes – large hail – damaging winds • cause most very large hail & significant tornadoes Thunderstorm Types Supercell Storms • discrete storms • many have a distinctive radar signature • “hook echo” often present • mesocyclone, possible tornado located in hook Supercell Structure on Radar Light Rain Forward‐flank Moderate/Heavy downdraft (FFD) Rain & Hail Gust Front Rear‐flank downdraft (RFD) Anvil Edge “Hook echo” Supercell Thunderstorm (top view) Nautical miles 0 5 10 Spotter Positioning “Right Hand Rule” When spotting a supercell, try to position yourself with heavy rain, hail to your right and updraft to your left Supercell Structure x Best location for viewing Overshooting Supercell Structure top Same storm from last slide, Anvil panoramic view Main storm Mammatus tower clouds Flanking line Downdraft Updraft Heavy rain Wall cloud Rain-free base & Hail You should be here X Storm motion Supercell Structure Identifying Cloud Features Shelf Clouds vs. Wall Clouds Shelf Clouds • associated w/squall lines • stretches far across skyline (“shelf stretches”) • along leading edge of storm • strong winds possible as it moves overhead • vertical rotation (or rolling motion) sometimes visible • marks edge of cool outflow air from storm Shelf Cloud Shelf Clouds vs. Wall Clouds Wall Clouds • associated w/supercells • local lowering in cloud base • usually located back of storm • favored location for tornado development • warm inflow air rushes into most wall clouds • horizontal rotation (spinning) sometimes visible Wall Cloud Shelf Clouds vs. Wall Clouds Shelf Cloud A B Wall Cloud Name that cloud! Shelf Clouds vs. Wall Clouds Shelf Cloud Name that A cloud! B Wall Cloud National Weather Service Valley, NE Shelf Cloud or Wall Cloud? More On Wall Clouds • Most storms don’t have wall clouds • Most wall clouds don’t produce tornadoes • Wall clouds that are likely to produce tornadoes tend to… – Exhibit rapid rotation – Have strong inflow – Often have “clear slot” wrapping around wall cloud Rapid Rotation Strong Inflow Rear Flank Downdraft (clear slot) Wall Cloud RFD Undercutting Wall Cloud Once a storm becomes dominated by outflow, a tornado is highly unlikely SLC’s ‐ Scary Looking Clouds (Scud Clouds) SLC’s ‐ Scary Looking Clouds (Scud Clouds) • form as a result of high humidity near storm • can extend very low to the ground • not an indication of severe weather (can be found in both severe & non‐severe t‐storms) SLC’s ‐ Scary Looking Clouds (Scud Clouds) • often fragmented and/or not connected to base of parent cloud • not rotating, though sometimes rising into parent cloud near updrafts • pose no hazard SLC’s ‐ Scary Looking Clouds (Scud Clouds) Tornado Impersonators • look for visual clues before reporting a tornado… – is the feature rotating? – is it in the part of the storm you’d expect a tornado? – Is it in contact with the ground? Common Tornado Impersonators Scud Clouds Common Tornado Impersonators Rainshafts Common Tornado Impersonators Virga Common Tornado Impersonators Smoke What Do I Report? What Do I Report? • tornado impersonators, scud, poor visibility due to trees & buildings make spotting very difficult • even seasoned meteorologists don’t always agree on what particular cloud features are • important to express uncertainties you have, if you’re not sure what you’re looking at, say so! Would This Be A Good Report? “I’m a trained spotter on I‐88 near mile marker 96 about 4 miles east of DeKalb right now. I’m looking north and about 5 miles from me I see a lowering that could be a tornado. I’m too far to see whether it’s rotating and I can’t tell if it’s in contact with the ground, but if it’s not, it’s close.” Would This Be A Good Report? • Good report because it gives all the important information… – Who (“I’m a trained spotter…”) – When (“…right now…”) – Where (“...on I‐88 near mile marker 96 about 4 miles east of DeKalb…I’m looking north and about 5 miles…”) – What (“…I see a lowering that could be a tornado…”) Would This Be A Good Report? • Good report because it gives all the important information… – Uncertainty (“I’m too far to see whether it’s rotating and I can’t tell if it’s in contact with the ground…”) • uncertainty builds credibility in your report Would This Be A Good Report? • uncertainty is better than overstating your certainty and ending up being wrong • report very useful still, correlated to other spotter reports and radar data What Do I Report? • hail (largest hailstone observed) – if it’s measured, say so and give exact measurement – if estimated, related to size of coin or ball – please don’t report “marble sized hail” because we don’t know how big your marbles are! What Do I Report? What Do I Report? • winds over 50 mph and/or wind damage – if reporting damage, report as many specifics as possible and location – if reporting measured wind gusts, please specifically state that is was measured – if reporting estimated wind gust, please stress that it was estimated – wind strength is often overestimated – estimating wind strength is difficult Estimating wind speed • 40 to 55 mph ‐ Non severe...Trees swaying, rain coming down horizontally, twigs and small limbs break, loose lightweight objects (trash cans, lawn chairs) blown around. Estimating wind speed • 60 to 80 mph...medium to large tree limbs downed, sheds, barns and weak structures damaged, truck pushed off the highway. Estimating wind speed • 80 to 100 mph+...numerous large tree limbs downed, shallow rooted trees pushed over, buildings partially unroofed, farm buildings, weak structures severely damaged. What Do I Report? • wall clouds, funnel clouds, tornadoes – always report where you are then approximately how far and in what direction it is from you – is rotation visible with wall cloud? – how far does funnel extend downward? – any damage or debris noted with tornado? What Do I Report? • flooding and/or measured very heavy rainfall – fast flowing water over roadways, estimate depth of water if possible – deep, impassable standing water blocking roads – rainfall >2” in less than an hour – streams or creeks out of their banks – flood waters threatening homes or businesses How To Report • Phone: (800) 681‐2972 (Put # in your cell phone now, if it’s not already) • eSpotter: http://espotter.crh.noaa.gov • Amateur Radio: http://weather.gov/lot/?n=am_radio [email protected] 815‐834‐0600, ext 726 © Amy Pavlik 2008.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • From Improving Tornado Warnings: from Observation to Forecast
    Improving Tornado Warnings: from Observation to Forecast John T. Snow Regents’ Professor of Meteorology Dean Emeritus, College of Atmospheric and Geographic Sciences, The University of Oklahoma Major contributions from: Dr. Russel Schneider –NOAA Storm Prediction Center Dr. David Stensrud – NOAA National Severe Storms Laboratory Dr. Ming Xue –Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms, University of Oklahoma Dr. Lou Wicker –NOAA National Severe Storms Laboratory Hazards Caucus Alliance Briefing Tornadoes: Understanding how they develop and providing early warning 10:30 am – 11:30 am, Wednesday, 21 July 2010 Senate Capitol Visitors Center 212 Each Year: ~1,500 tornadoes touch down in the United States, causing over 80 deaths, 100s of injuries, and an estimated $1.1 billion in damages Statistics from NOAA Storm Prediction Center Supercell –A long‐lived rotating thunderstorm the primary type of thunderstorm producing strong and violent tornadoes Present Warning System: Warn on Detection • A Warning is the culmination of information developed and distributed over the preceding days sequence of day‐by‐day forecasts identifies an area of high threat •On the day, storm spotters deployed; radars monitor formation, growth of thunderstorms • Appearance of distinct cloud or radar echo features tornado has formed or is about to do so Warning is generated, distributed Present Warning System: Warn on Detection Radar at 2100 CST Radar at 2130 CST with Warning Thunderstorms are monitored using radar A warning is issued based on the detected and
    [Show full text]
  • From the Line in the Sand: Accounts of USAF Company Grade Officers In
    ~~may-='11 From The Line In The Sand Accounts of USAF Company Grade Officers Support of 1 " 1 " edited by gi Squadron 1 fficer School Air University Press 4/ Alabama 6" March 1994 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data From the line in the sand : accounts of USAF company grade officers in support of Desert Shield/Desert Storm / edited by Michael P. Vriesenga. p. cm. Includes index. 1. Persian Gulf War, 1991-Aerial operations, American . 2. Persian Gulf War, 1991- Personai narratives . 3. United States . Air Force-History-Persian Gulf War, 1991 . I. Vriesenga, Michael P., 1957- DS79 .724.U6F735 1994 94-1322 959.7044'248-dc20 CIP ISBN 1-58566-012-4 First Printing March 1994 Second Printing September 1999 Third Printing March 2001 Disclaimer This publication was produced in the Department of Defense school environment in the interest of academic freedom and the advancement of national defense-related concepts . The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the United States government. This publication hasbeen reviewed by security andpolicy review authorities and is clearedforpublic release. For Sale by the Superintendent of Documents US Government Printing Office Washington, D.C . 20402 ii 9&1 gook L ar-dicat£a to com#an9 9zacL orflcF-T 1, #ait, /2ZE4Ent, and, E9.#ECLaL6, TatUlLE. -ZEa¢ra anJ9~ 0 .( THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Contents Essay Page DISCLAIMER .... ... ... .... .... .. ii FOREWORD ...... ..... .. .... .. xi ABOUT THE EDITOR . ..... .. .... xiii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . ..... .. .... xv INTRODUCTION .... ..... .. .. ... xvii SUPPORT OFFICERS 1 Madzuma, Michael D., and Buoniconti, Michael A.
    [Show full text]
  • Tornadoes & Funnel Clouds Fake Tornado
    NOAA’s National Weather Service Basic Concepts of Severe Storm Spotting 2009 – Rusty Kapela Milwaukee/Sullivan weather.gov/milwaukee Housekeeping Duties • How many new spotters? - if this is your first spotter class & you intend to be a spotter – please raise your hands. • A basic spotter class slide set & an advanced spotter slide set can be found on the Storm Spotter Page on the Milwaukee/Sullivan web site (handout). • Utilize search engines and You Tube to find storm videos and other material. Class Agenda • 1) Why we are here • 2) National Weather Service Structure & Role • 3) Role of Spotters • 4) Types of reports needed from spotters • 5) Thunderstorm structure • 6) Shelf clouds & rotating wall clouds • 7) You earn your “Learner’s Permit” Thunderstorm Structure Those two cloud features you were wondering about… Storm Movement Shelf Cloud Rotating Wall Cloud Rain, Hail, Downburst winds Tornadoes & Funnel Clouds Fake Tornado It’s not rotating & no damage! Let’s Get Started! Video Why are we here? Parsons Manufacturing 120-140 employees inside July 13, 2004 Roanoke, IL Storm shelters F4 Tornado – no injuries or deaths. They have trained spotters with 2-way radios Why Are We Here? National Weather Service’s role – Issue warnings & provide training Spotter’s role – Provide ground-truth reports and observations We need (more) spotters!! National Weather Service Structure & Role • Federal Government • Department of Commerce • National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration • National Weather Service 122 Field Offices, 6 Regional, 13 River Forecast Centers, Headquarters, other specialty centers Mission – issue forecasts and warnings to minimize the loss of life & property National Weather Service Forecast Office - Milwaukee/Sullivan Watch/Warning responsibility for 20 counties in southeast and south- central Wisconsin.
    [Show full text]
  • 911 Communicator Questions to Ask Of
    911 Communicator Questions to ask of Severe Weather Spotters 1. Name, home address, and telephone number. 2. Is caller a trained severe weather spotter. 3. Time of call. 4. Time of severe weather event (may be different than call time). 5. Location of severe weather event, which may be different from location where spotter called from. (If spotter doesn’t say 1.2 miles southeast of Anytown, then request names of streets at nearest intersection). 6. Type of Weather Event – (most common to least common order) a. If it’s a wind report, ask if the reported speed is measured or estimated. b. If it’s a wind damage report, ask caller to estimate how many trees are damaged, uprooted, etc., or extent and severity of structural damage. c. If it’s a hail event, ask if the reported size is measured or estimated. (penny, nickel, quarter, golf ball, soft ball, etc.) d. If it’s a flood report, ask caller to estimate depth of water on roads or on lawns, ask if the water is stationary or moving, and extent or severity of damage. e. If it’s a “rotating wall-cloud” report, i. Persistent rotation (usually on backside of storm) = true rotating wall-cloud. ii. No rotation = scary-looking cloud (scud), or a non-rotating wall-cloud. f. If it’s a funnel-cloud report, ask caller if the funnel-shaped cloud is actually rotating. If the caller is too far away from the funnel-cloud they may not be able to see rotation. i. No rotation = just a scary-looking cloud (scud).
    [Show full text]
  • The Lagrange Torando During Vortex2. Part Ii: Photogrammetry Analysis of the Tornado Combined with Dual-Doppler Radar Data
    6.3 THE LAGRANGE TORANDO DURING VORTEX2. PART II: PHOTOGRAMMETRY ANALYSIS OF THE TORNADO COMBINED WITH DUAL-DOPPLER RADAR DATA Nolan T. Atkins*, Roger M. Wakimoto#, Anthony McGee*, Rachel Ducharme*, and Joshua Wurman+ *Lyndon State College #National Center for Atmospheric Research +Center for Severe Weather Research Lyndonville, VT 05851 Boulder, CO 80305 Boulder, CO 80305 1. INTRODUCTION studies, however, that have related the velocity and reflectivity features observed in the radar data to Over the years, mobile ground-based and air- the visual characteristics of the condensation fun- borne Doppler radars have collected high-resolu- nel, debris cloud, and attendant surface damage tion data within the hook region of supercell (e.g., Bluestein et al. 1993, 1197, 204, 2007a&b; thunderstorms (e.g., Bluestein et al. 1993, 1997, Wakimoto et al. 2003; Rasmussen and Straka 2004, 2007a&b; Wurman and Gill 2000; Alexander 2007). and Wurman 2005; Wurman et al. 2007b&c). This paper is the second in a series that pre- These studies have revealed details of the low- sents analyses of a tornado that formed near level winds in and around tornadoes along with LaGrange, WY on 5 June 2009 during the Verifica- radar reflectivity features such as weak echo holes tion on the Origins of Rotation in Tornadoes Exper- and multiple high-reflectivity rings. There are few iment (VORTEX 2). VORTEX 2 (Wurman et al. 5 June, 2009 KCYS 88D 2002 UTC 2102 UTC 2202 UTC dBZ - 0.5° 100 Chugwater 100 50 75 Chugwater 75 330° 25 Goshen Co. 25 km 300° 50 Goshen Co. 25 60° KCYS 30° 30° 50 80 270° 10 25 40 55 dBZ 70 -45 -30 -15 0 15 30 45 ms-1 Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • June 18, 2017 Landspout Tornadoes
    June 18, 2017 Landspout Tornadoes During the evening hours of Sunday, June 18, thunderstorms developed in the vicinity of a cold front over Reagan and Upton Counties.As a result of intense heating and an incredible amount of instability along this boundary, three EF0 landspout* (see definitionat bottom of report) tornadoes touched down in Reagan and southeast Upton Counties between 7 and 8 pm CDT. These tornadoes occurred in open country and no damage was reported. Tornado #1 – EF0: Southwest Reagan County to Southeast Upton County (~7:05-7:13 pm CDT) The first thunderstorm developed around 6:00 pm near Big Lake, TX and slowly moved west along and near US Hwy 67. Law enforcement officersand folks in the area viewed and took images of a tornado that developed 1-2 miles south of US Hwy 67 roughly 14 miles east of Big Lake and continued westward through open fields insouth east portions of Upton County. The tornado was narrow, perhaps 50-75 yards in width and no damage was reported with this tornado. Photo by Maybell Carrasco Photo by Greg Romero Tornado #2 – EF0: Central Reagan Photo by Shanna Gibson County (~8:00 pm CDT) Another thunderstorm moving west, entered eastern Reagan County around 7:30 pm. As this storm approached Big Lake, a second tornado was spotted around 8 pm roughly 6-7 miles northeast of Big Lake, 2-3 miles east of SH 137. This tornado was very short-lived and went undetected on radar. It occurred in open country and no damage was reported. Tornado #3 – EF0: Northeast Reagan County – approximately 20-25 miles north of Big Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • Squall Lines: Meteorology, Skywarn Spotting, & a Brief Look at the 18
    Squall Lines: Meteorology, Skywarn Spotting, & A Brief Look At The 18 June 2010 Derecho Gino Izzi National Weather Service, Chicago IL Outline • Meteorology 301: Squall lines – Brief review of thunderstorm basics – Squall lines – Squall line tornadoes – Mesovorticies • Storm spotting for squall lines • Brief Case Study of 18 June 2010 Event Thunderstorm Ingredients • Moisture – Gulf of Mexico most common source locally Thunderstorm Ingredients • Lifting Mechanism(s) – Fronts – Jet Streams – “other” boundaries – topography Thunderstorm Ingredients • Instability – Measure of potential for air to accelerate upward – CAPE: common variable used to quantify magnitude of instability < 1000: weak 1000-2000: moderate 2000-4000: strong 4000+: extreme Thunderstorms Thunderstorms • Moisture + Instability + Lift = Thunderstorms • What kind of thunderstorms? – Single Cell – Multicell/Squall Line – Supercells Thunderstorm Types • What determines T-storm Type? – Short/simplistic answer: CAPE vs Shear Thunderstorm Types • What determines T-storm Type? (Longer/more complex answer) – Lot we don’t know, other factors (besides CAPE/shear) include • Strength of forcing • Strength of CAP • Shear WRT to boundary • Other stuff Thunderstorm Types • Multi-cell squall lines most common type of severe thunderstorm type locally • Most common type of severe weather is damaging winds • Hail and brief tornadoes can occur with most the intense squall lines Squall Lines & Spotting Squall Line Terminology • Squall Line : a relatively narrow line of thunderstorms, often
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded 09/30/21 06:43 PM UTC JUNE 1996 MONTEVERDI and JOHNSON 247
    246 WEATHER AND FORECASTING VOLUME 11 A Supercell Thunderstorm with Hook Echo in the San Joaquin Valley, California JOHN P. MONTEVERDI Department of Geosciences, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California STEVE JOHNSON Association of Central California Weather Observers, Fresno, California (Manuscript received 30 January 1995, in ®nal form 9 February 1996) ABSTRACT This study documents a damaging supercell thunderstorm that occurred in California's San Joaquin Valley on 5 March 1994. The storm formed in a ``cold sector'' environment similar to that documented for several other recent Sacramento Valley severe thunderstorm events. Analyses of hourly subsynoptic surface and radar data suggested that two thunderstorms with divergent paths developed from an initial echo that had formed just east of the San Francisco Bay region. The southern storm became severe as it ingested warmer, moister boundary layer air in the south-central San Joaquin Valley. A well-developed hook echo with a 63-dBZ core was observed by a privately owned 5-cm radar as the storm passed through the Fresno area. Buoyancy parameters and ho- dograph characteristics were obtained both for estimated conditions for Fresno [on the basis of a modi®ed morning Oakland (OAK) sounding] and for the actual storm environment (on the basis of a radiosonde launched from Lemoore Naval Air Station at about the time of the storm's passage through the Fresno area). Both the estimated and actual hodographs essentially were straight and suggested storm splitting. Although the actual CAPE was similar to that which was estimated, the observed magnitude of the low-level shear was considerably greater than the estimate.
    [Show full text]
  • Skip Talbot Photography by Jennifer Brindley
    STORM SPOTTING Skip Talbot SECRETS Photography by Jennifer Brindley Ubl and others Topics • Supercell Visualization • Radar Presentation • Structure Identification • Storm Properties • Walk Through Disclaimers • Attend spotter training • Your safety is more important than spotting, photos, video, or tornado reports Supercell Visualization Lemon and Doswell 1979 Supercell Visualization Supercell Visualization Photo: Chris Gullikson Supercell Visualization Photo: Chris Gullikson Anvil Anvil Backshear Mammatus Cumulonimbus Flanking Line Cloud Base Striations Precipitation Wall Cloud Precipitation-free Base Supercell Visualization Radar Presentation Classic Hook Echo Radar Presentation Android / iOS Android Windows GrLevel3 / GrLevel2 Radar Presentation Classic Hook Echo Radar Presentation Radar Presentation Radar Presentation Radar Presentation Storm Spotting Zoo • Bear’s Cage • Whale’s Mouth • Beaver Tail • Horseshoe • Ghost Train Base (Updraft Base) (Rain Free Base or RFB) Base (Updraft Base) (Rain Free Base or RFB) Base (Updraft Base) (Rain Free Base or RFB) Base (Updraft Base) (Rain Free Base or RFB) Base (Updraft Base) (Rain Free Base or RFB) Base (Updraft Base) (Rain Free Base or RFB) Horseshoe Horseshoe Horseshoe Horseshoe Horseshoe Horseshoe Horseshoe Horseshoe Horseshoe Horseshoe Horseshoe Horseshoe Horseshoe Horseshoe - Cyclical supercell with multiple tornadoes HorseshoeHorseshoe HorseshoeHorseshoe Horseshoe Horseshoe – Anticyclonic Funnel Horseshoe Horseshoe – Anticyclonic Funnel Horseshoe - No Wall Cloud Horseshoe - No Wall Cloud
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-Latitude Dynamics and Atmospheric Rivers Session: Theory, Structure, Processes 1 Jason M
    Mid-Latitude Dynamics and Atmospheric Rivers Session: Theory, Structure, Processes 1 Jason M. Cordeira Wednesday, 10 August 2016 Plymouth State University, CW3E/Scripps Contribution from: Heini Werni Peter Knippertz Harold Sodemann Andreas Stohl Francina Dominguez Huancui Hu 2016 International Atmospheric Rivers Conference 8–11 August 2016 Scripps Institution of Oceanography Objective and Outline Objective • What components of midlatitude circulation support formation and structure of atmospheric rivers? Outline • Part 1: ARs, midlatitude storm track, and cyclogenesis • Part 2: ARs, tropical moisture exports, and warm conveyor belt Objective and Outline Objective • What components of midlatitude circulation support formation and structure of atmospheric rivers? Outline • Part 1: ARs, midlatitude storm track, and cyclogenesis • Part 2: ARs, tropical moisture exports, and warm conveyor belt Mimic TPW (SSEC/Wisconsin) • Global water vapor distribution is concentrated at lower latitudes owing to warmer temperatures • Observations illustrate poleward extrusions of water vapor along “tropospheric rivers” or “atmospheric rivers” Zhu and Newell (MWR-1998) • >90% of meridional water vapor transports occurs along ARs • ARs part of midlatitude cyclones and move with storm track Climatology of Water Vapor Transport Global mean IVT 150 kg m−1 s−1 • ECMWF ERA Interim Reanalysis • Oct–Mar 99/00 to 08/09 (i.e., ten winters) • IVT calculated for isobaric layers between 1000 and 100 hPa Tropical–Extratropical Interactions Waugh and Fanutso (2003-JAS) Knippertz
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of `Miholjday Summer' for Belgrade and Serbia Region
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY Int. J. Climatol. 26: 1489–1499 (2006) Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/joc.1390 ANALYSIS OF ‘MIHOLJDAY SUMMER’ FOR BELGRADE AND SERBIA REGION NEDELJKO TODOROVIC´ a* and DRAGANA VUJOVIC´ b* a Hydrometeorological Service of Serbia, Belgrade, Yugoslavia b Department of Meteorology, Faculty of Physics, Belgrade, Yugoslavia Received 30 May 2006 Revised 14 February 2006 Accepted 11 April 2006 ABSTRACT Typical weather conditions with dry and warm features occur in autumn months, with temperatures above the normal temperatures for this period of the year for the Belgrade and Serbia region. Temperatures have values like the ones for the end of summer. That period of fair weather is called Miholjday (St Michael) summer (MS). An analysis of temperature has been the most important criterion for defining MS. Synoptic situation and temperature conditions during that period are analyzed and typical and atypical MSs are defined for Belgrade and Serbia region. The frequency of MS in the period 1946–2004 for Belgrade region is also analyzed. The general definition (Glossary of Meteorology) is assumed and we gave the specific definition of MS for Belgrade and Serbia region on the basis of real weather for longer series of observations. Copyright 2006 Royal Meteorological Society. KEY WORDS: summer climate variability; weather singularity; weather classification; synoptic climatology 1. INTRODUCTION Miholjday summer (MS) appears in autumn, in the period from the middle of September to the beginning of November. The name is related with Miholjday, the Christian feast celebrated on 12 October in the Orthodox Church (29 September in the Catholic Church).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Atmospheric Moisture, Condensation, and Clouds
    9/13/2012 Chapter 4 Atmospheric Moisture, Condensation, and Clouds. The sun’s electromagnetic spectrum and some of the descriptive names of each region. The numbers underneath the curve approximate the percent of energy the sun radiates in various regions. 0.4 μm = 400 nm 0.7 μm = 700 nm The daily variation in air temperature is controlled by incoming energy (primarily from the sun) and outgoing energy from the earth’s surface. Where incoming energy exceeds outgoing energy (orange shade), the air temperature rises. Where outgoing energy exceeds incoming energy (gray The hotter sun not only radiates more energy than that of the cooler earth (the area shade), the air under the curve), but it also radiates the majority of its energy at much shorter temperature falls. wavelengths. (The area under the curves is equal to the total energy emitted, and the scales for the two curves differ by a factor of 100,000.) 1 9/13/2012 The average annual incoming solar radiation (yellow line) absorbed by the earth and the atmosphere along with the average annual infrared radiation (red line) emitted by the earth and the atmosphere. Water can exist in 3 phases, depending Evaporation, Condensation, upon pressure and temperature. & Saturation • Evaporation is the change of liquid into a gas and requires heat. • Condensation is the change of a gas into a liquid and releases heat. • Condensation nuclei • Sublimation: solid to gaseous state without becoming a liquid. • Saturation is an equilibrium condition http://www.sci.uidaho.edu/scripter/geog100/l http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Physical_Che in which for each molecule that ect/05‐atmos‐water‐wx/ch5‐part‐2‐water‐ mistry/Physical_Properties_of_Matter/Phas phases.htm e_Transitions/Phase_Diagrams_1 evaporates, one condenses.
    [Show full text]