DOCSLIB.ORG

The Welfare State: a General Theory. London: Sage

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Welfare State: a General Theory. London: Sage SPICKER, P. 2000. The welfare state: a general theory. London: Sage. Hosted on Paul Spicker's blog [online]. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/yxl44olq The welfare state: a general theory. SPICKER, P. 2000 © Paul Spicker 2000. This document was downloaded from https://openair.rgu.ac.uk The Welfare State: a general theory Paul Spicker First published 2000 by Sage Publications, ISBN 0-7619-6704-4 and 0-7619-6705-2 © Paul Spicker The author retains the intellectual property. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work, under the following conditions: ! Attribution: you must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). ! Noncommercial: you may not use this work for commercial purposes. ! No Derivative Works: you may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. To view a copy of the licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA. 2 CONTENTS Method 6 I. PEOPLE AND SOCIETY 18 I.1. The person 15 People in society 15 The nature of the personal 17 Social obligations 20 I.2. Society 25 Collective action 25 Society and social relationships 29 Social structure 32 I.3. Social responsibility 38 Solidarity: altruism and responsibility 38 Mutual aid 41 Cohesion and exclusion 46 Social responsibility and social borders I.4. The moral community 52 Moral rules 52 The social construction of morality 54 Deviance and control 57 Moral approaches to social action 60 The moral community 61 II. WELFARE 65 II.1 The nature of welfare 66 Welfare 66 Poverty and exclusion 69 Responding to need 72 3 II.2 The preconditions for welfare 75 Economic development 75 Basic security 77 The structure of rights 79 II.3 Social protection 84 Social protection 84 The limits of the market 86 The social services 89 The moral basis of welfare provision II.4 Welfare and redistribution 94 Welfare in society 94 Social justice 98 Inequality 99 Redistribution 101 Redistribution between societies 104 III. THE STATE AND WELFARE 106 III.1 The role of the state 107 The nature of government 107 The state and society 111 Legitimate authority 113 III.2 The Welfare States 116 The state and welfare 116 Securing welfare 118 The provision of welfare 120 The welfare states 125 III.3 Social Policy 131 The promotion of welfare 131 Functions of social policy 133 Legitimate and illegitimate activity 135 III.4 State action 139 The state and social policy 139 4 Provision by the state 143 The production of welfare 146 Welfare strategies 149 Assessing social policy 151 Summary of the argument 153 Afterword 161 5 6 AUTHOR'S NOTE, 2015 The welfare state: a general theory was first published by Sage in 2000. Sage have agreed that the rights should revert to me, and I am making it freely available on the internet. Theory dates slowly, and I have not felt the need significantly to update what I wrote here, but in my later writing I have gone beyond some of the arguments raised here - particularly in relation to the final sections. In Liberty, Equality, Fraternity (2006) I looked at the arguments about principles in much greater depth, and Reclaiming individualism (Policy Press, 2013) makes a liberal case for expanding the role of government. I have made some alterations, but those are more about presentation than about content. The rather unusual format makes some demands of the typography - I had explained to the publishers that the book needed nine different layouts for headings. I have cut out some figures and tables, which don’t really display well in e-books, and have concentrated instead on making sure that the book will still make sense if someone tries to read it on an e-reader. The book had mixed reviews when it came out. Colin Clark wrote in the British Journal of Social Work: “This is an audacious book ... The attempt to lay out of the propositions of welfare in their barest form, and demonstrate their relations, is novel and challenging. It is the kind of book we may value as much for the disagreements it provokes as the answers it offers.” Others disliked the unconventional approach. It’s true that the effect of opening arguments with propositions - something I’d adapted from writers in philosophy - had a major effect on the style of the argument. Although I’ve largely left the text alone, I should say something about the evidence for the argument, which certainly has moved on. When I wrote this book, over fifteen years ago, much of what was happening in the world seemed to suggest I was running against the tide. People were writing about the crisis of welfare states; international organisations were still heavily committed to ‘structural adjustment’, expanding the private sector and cutting public policy down to size. If the argument in this book was right, that should not have been what was happening. I was making a case that welfare did not begin with the state, but that states had become increasingly committed to welfare, that welfare provision was becoming more generalised, and that once they had started on the road they found the pressures to do more hard to resist. It seems to me that this argument has been borne out very strongly in the intervening years. In the 1990s, some governments in developing countries had started to introduce Essential Health Care Packages; several had developed major schemes for universal primary education; others had started to develop systems of social assistance, which have taken root in the form of ‘conditional cash transfers’. It has been called a ‘quiet revolution’. In a field where most works focus on the differences between welfare states rather than their similarities, no-one has challenged me on the basic propositions. Paul Spicker 7 METHOD This book is a study in Social Policy, an academic subject concerned with the application of the social sciences to the study of social welfare. Social Policy does not have a distinctive disciplinary approach. The material which is used in this study is drawn from a number of sources, principally sociology, philosophy, politics and economics; at other times, there are references to material from history, psychology, anthropology and law. The argument develops a general theory of the welfare state. What is meant by a 'welfare state' will be explained in the course of the argument, but it is also important to explain what a 'general theory' is, and so what kind of book this is. Theory in social science Theory in social science begins with the process of describing empirical material, by disentangling facts from each other, and laying out a framework through which it can subsequently be analysed and understood. Scientific knowledge generally needs much more than description to flourish, but description comes first: biology has its taxonomies, carefully describing the classes of species, and social science has its descriptive systems, which help to explain what is happening and why it matters. The best known schemes for describing welfare states are probably those introduced by Richard Titmuss1 and Gøsta Esping-Andersen2. These models have important deficiencies3, and the kinds of generalisation they make are difficult to relate to welfare states in practice4. This book is concerned with a different type of description, and it` takes a different approach. The method of the book depends on a closely structured, and sometimes formal, reasoning. Formal reasoning in social science has largely been confined to economic theory, though there is also a specialised literature within sociology.5 Economic analysis, and particularly welfare economics, is largely based in a formalistic argument which describes the implications of certain types of action, rather than the question of whether people really behave in that way. If certain conditions obtain, the argument runs, then, other things being equal, certain consequences will follow. This kind of reasoning has been applied at several points in the argument of this book. For example, comparative advantage - the idea that people can produce more through specialisation and exchange than they can 1 R Titmuss, 1974, Social policy: an introduction, London: Allen and Unwin. 2 G Esping-Andersen, 1990, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Brighton: Polity. 3 P Spicker, 1996, Normative comparisons of social security systems, in L Hantrais, S Mangen (eds) Cross-national research methods in the social sciences, London: Pinter, pp.66-75. 4 D Mabbett, H Bolderson, 1999, Theories and methods in comparative social policy, in J Clasen (ed) Comparative social policy: concepts, theories and methods, Oxford: Blackwell. 5 R Boudon, 1974, The logic of sociological explanations, Harmondsworth: Penguin Education. 8 individually - is not a hypothesis; it can be demonstrated arithmetically or geometrically.6 The proof is not falsifiable, any more than the statement that “2 + 2 = 4” is falsifiable. References to the evidence serve, not to prove or disprove the theory, but to ground it - to show whether such conditions do, in fact, apply. This is the pattern of much of the argument of the book. The method is strongly associated with analytical theory, but this book is not simply an exercise in abstract reasoning. The formal arguments are related to the available evidence. This is not an argument a priori; it is grounded theory. Grounded theory is not the same thing as scientific deduction. Part of the received wisdom of social science is that a scientific theory should be empirically testable, and so that it must be falsifiable.7 This is right, but it is only half-right.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Welfare State Regimes: a Literature Review
    Welfare State Regimes: a Literature Review Arshad Isakjee IRIS WORKING PAPER SERIES, NO. 18/2017 www.birmingham.ac.uk/iris IRiS Working Paper Series The Institute for Research into Superdiversity (IRiS) Working Paper Series is intended to aid the rapid distribution of work in progress, research findings and special lectures by researchers and associates of the Institute. Papers aim to stimulate discussion among scholars, policymakers and practitioners and will address a range of topics including issues surrounding population dynamics, security, cohesion and integration, identity, global networks, rights and citizenship, diasporic and transnational activities, service delivery, wellbeing, social exclusion and the opportunities which superdiverse societies offer to support economic recovery. The IRiS WP Series is edited by Dr Nando Sigona at the Institute for Research into Superdiversity, University of Birmingham. We welcome proposals for Working Papers from researchers, policymakers and practitioners; for queries and proposals, please contact: [email protected]. All papers are peer-reviewed before publication. The opinions expressed in the papers are solely those of the author/s who retain the copyright. They should not be attributed to the project funders or the Institute for Research into Superdiversity, the School of Social Policy or the University of Birmingham. Papers are distributed free of charge in PDF format via the IRiS website. Hard copies will be occasionally available at IRiS public events. This Working Paper is also part of UPWEB Working Paper Series (No.5/2017) For more info on UPWEB: http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/generic/upweb/index.aspx 2 | IRIS WORKING PAPER SERIES NO.18/2017 Abstract This literature review seeks to position the UPWEB research project in relation to discourses on welfare regimes.
    [Show full text]
  • What's Right with Welfare? the Other Face of AFDC
    The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare Volume 16 Issue 2 June - Special Issue on Social Justice, Article 2 Values, and Social Work Practice June 1989 What's Right with Welfare? The Other Face of AFDC Ronald B. Dear University of Washington Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw Part of the Social Welfare Commons, and the Social Work Commons Recommended Citation Dear, Ronald B. (1989) "What's Right with Welfare? The Other Face of AFDC," The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare: Vol. 16 : Iss. 2 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol16/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you by the Western Michigan University School of Social Work. For more information, please contact [email protected]. What's Right with Welfare? The Other Face of AFDC' RONALD B. DEAR University of Washington School of Social Work Eleven million people, mostly mothers and children, depend on Aid to Families with Dependent Children, America's largest child welfare pro- gram. Much is wrong with AFDC welfare, and serious efforts are being made, again, to reform it. So far, no major attempts at reform have been successful. If reform is to succeed, we must understand what needs to be corrected and what does not. What's right with welfare? This study, not an apology or excuse for AFDC, answers that rarely asked question. Part I surveys back- ground. Part II cites myths and criticisms of AFDC and portrays pov- erty as it afflicts children and female-headed households. The focus of the analysis is on the depiction of 12 positive features of AFDC.
    [Show full text]
  • Welfare, Work, and American Indians November 2001
    Acknowledgements This report was made possible through funding from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the W. K. Kellogg Foundation through the National Congress of American Indians. We extend special thanks to Sarah Hicks (National Congress of American Indians) for her guidance and support throughout the development of this report, to Delaine Alley and Ashley Cruse for invaluable research assistance, to the program administrators of the 34 HHS-approved tribal TANF programs for responding to the “Tribal TANF Administration Survey,” to Norm DeWeaver of the Indian and Native American Training Coalition for his contributions to and review of the document, and to the numerous tribal professionals, TANF program staff members, and other individuals who shared their expertise and experience with us and our colleagues at conferences and in dozens of conversations and interviews. Contacts For Further Information Dr. Eddie F. Brown, Director Kathryn M. Buder Center for American Indian Studies George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University Campus Box 1196, One Brookings Drive St. Louis, MO 63130-4899 Tel: 314-935-4510 Email: [email protected] Dr. Stephen Cornell, Director Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, The University of Arizona 803 East First Street Tucson, AZ 85719 Tel: 520-884-4393 Email: [email protected] Welfare, Work, and American Indians November 2001 Executive Summary The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA) ushered in a new era of welfare programs in America. PRWORA and related legislation specifically addressed the needs of American Indian tribes. In this report we review the key features of the welfare reform legislation as it applies to American Indians and Indian Country, assess—to the best of our ability with currently available information—its impact on Indian nations and its chances of achieving its goals, and identify key issues that demand attention if welfare reform is to succeed on Indian lands.
    [Show full text]
  • World Federation Against the Welfare State: Hayek and Röpke Think Global Before 1945
    Conference Paper Hitotsubashi University Tokyo, Japan March 21, 2015 Draft – Do Not Cite or Circulate World Federation against the Welfare State: Hayek and Röpke Think Global before 1945 Quinn Slobodian Wellesley College It has fallen to myself and a couple of others at this conference to speak not about the proponents of the welfare state but its critics. In the following, I will talk in particular about two of the fathers of the neoliberal intellectual movement, Wilhelm Röpke and Friedrich Hayek. I will do so by way of an insight from geography, asking questions about the welfare state and scale. Because I think it is only when we think about the space between the nation and the world that the neoliberal critique can be grasped. The welfare state, two historians observe, is often “understood as quintessentially a national phenomenon or as a set of uniquely national projects.” 1 Insofar as transnational aspects are recognized in the period before 1945, it is in the traffic of models: the movement of social-scientific knowledge from place to place, and occasionally the activity of a fledgling international organization like the International Labor Organization (ILO) formed in 1919. The national focus is not coincidental. In fact, it follows from the tools of economic policy and knowledge themselves. As is now widely acknowledged, the idea of “the economy” itself as an object to be observed, modeled and engineered only arose with the tools of national income accounting. 2 Röpke himself pointed out in 1937 that macroeconomics encouraged the national frame of policy, including what he called “self- contained national income theory.” 3 The nation-state was the assumed if not the explicit 1 Chris Pierson and Matthieu Leimgruber, "Intellectual Roots," in The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State , ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Symbols of Resistance
    Symbols of Resistance: A Study of Anarchist Space and Identity in Philadelphia By Ariel Henderson A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in anthropology Bryn Mawr College May, 2003 1 Acknowledgements First and foremost I would like to thank the activists who were generous enough to give me their time and advice. I would also like to thank Professor Kilbride for his tireless tutelage and Professor Hart for her willing input, as well as Professors Takenaka, Pashigian, and Woodhouse-Beyer for their help during the preliminary stages of preparation. Also, thank you to the ladies of my senior seminar class. Finally allow me to thank everyone who has supported me throughout this process: Lloyd 91 and all my friends with cars (late night Wawa runs), My sister Naomi, Josh, Minka, and Carlo. 2 Table of Contents Introduction 1 Methodology Relevant Literature Chapter 1: Histories of People and Places 11 Anarchism in Philadelphia A Philadelphia Anarchist Anarchist Places: The Wooden Shoe Anarchist Places: The A-Space The Future of Anarchism in Philadelphia Chapter 2: Anarchist Identity Localized in Place 21 Beginning Fieldwork Place and Identity Theoretical Reflection Autonomy and Separateness Turning Anarchist Values into Public Knowledge Conclusion Chapter 3: The Individual and the Collective 31 Autonomy, Affinity Groups and Anonymity Consensus and Communal Space Leadership Conclusion Chapter 4: The Cultural Roots of Anarchism 40 An American Ideal: Individualism Individuality in Modern Social Movements Theoretical Discussion Current Social Movement Theory: Two Camps Interpretation: Symbolic Action Utopia: Personal Observations Conclusion Conclusion 51 3 Abstract During the period from January 20th to May 3rd I conducted participant observation research at two different locations in Philadelphia – the Wooden Shoe bookstore and the A-Space.
    [Show full text]
  • Studying Social Work: Neoliberalism, Institutional Ethnography and a Program of Undergraduate Social Work Education
    STUDYING SOCIAL WORK: NEOLIBERALISM, INSTITUTIONAL ETHNOGRAPHY AND A PROGRAM OF UNDERGRADUATE SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION Kathleen Piovesan Bachelor of Arts, University of Victoria, 2002 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS In the Department of Sociology and Anthropology O Kathleen Piovesan 2007 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author Name: Kathleen Piovesan Degree: Master of Arts Title of Thesis: Studying Social Work: Neoliberalism, Institutional Ethnography and A Program of Undergraduate Social Work Education Examining Committee: Chair: Dr. Wendy Chan Associate Professor of Sociology Dr. Dara Culhane Senior Supervisor Associate Professor of Anthropology Dr. Jane Pulkingham Supervisor Associate Professor of Sociology Dr. Dany Lacombe External Examiner Associate Professor of Sociology Declaration of The author, whose copyright is declared on the title page of this work, has granted to Simon Fraser University the right to lend this thesis, project or extended essay to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. The author has further granted permission to Simon Fraser University to keep or make a digital copy for use in its circulating collection (currently available to the public at the 'Institutional Repositoryw link of the SFU Library website <www.lib.sfu.ca> at: <http://ir.lib.sfu.ca/handle/1892/112>) and, without changing the content, to translate the thesis/project or extended essays, if technically possible, to any medium or format for the purpose of preservation of the digital work.
    [Show full text]
  • The Struggle for Social Welfare: Towards an Emerging Welfare Sociology
    SOCIETY REGISTER 2019 / 3(2): 7-19 ISSN 2544–5502 DOI: 10.14746/sr.2019.3.2.01 THE STRUGGLE FOR SOCIAL WELFARE: TOWARDS AN EMERGING WELFARE SOCIOLOGY MARIUSZ BARANOWSKI1 1 Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Szamarzewskiego 89 C, 60-568 Poznań, Poland. ORCID: 0000- 0001-6755-9368, Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT: The main aim of the article is to outline welfare sociology as a potential sub-discipline of sociology and to discuss the issues of broadly defined social welfare. While in contemporary social sciences the literature concerning welfare often focuses on themes such as happiness (psychology), prosperity (economics), or quality of life (sociology), these themes may be considered too narrow and do not reflect the com- plexity of the issue. However, if one considers the definition of social welfare through the prism of material and non-material needs, as well as the needs expressed individ- ually and collectively, it is possible to attempt a comprehensive study of this phenom- enon. The author uses the definition of social welfare to look at research on (a) welfare state regimes, (b) welfare attitudes and (c) issues of work in contemporary capitalism, all to enable the application of research results within the analysis of the title concept. KEYWORDS: social welfare, welfare scarcity, welfare sociology, well-being, ill-being INTRODUCTION The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of social welfare struggles (cf. Marx and Engels [1848] 1948:9). Class struggle, for example, is an important but only a subset of the space/agglomerate of multifaceted battles for social welfare.
    [Show full text]
  • Autonomism and Anarchy
    Toward Anarchist and Autonomist Marxist Geographies Nathan Clough1 University of Minnesota, Duluth [email protected] Renata Blumberg University of Minnesota, Twin Cities [email protected] Introduction In recent months, the Occupy movement has reinvigorated the imagination of the Left in the United States and elsewhere, by moving radical politics in new directions and creating spaces based upon participatory and non-hierarchical modes of organizing. Anarchist, autonomist Marxist and libertarian socialist ideas have played critical roles in imagining and enacting Occupy spaces, achieving renewed influence in the process. Writing about this turning point in politics for The Nation, Nathan Schneider states: “The anarchists’ way of operating was changing our very idea of what politics could be in the first place. This was exhilarating” (2011 unpaginated online source). This volume brings together geographic scholarship on anarchism and autonomist Marxism for the first time. Even before Occupy Wall Street, anarchism and autonomist Marxism as political ideologies and radical methodologies have been on the rise in the West at least since the 1999 World Trade Organization 1 Published under the Creative Commons licence: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works Towards Anarchist and Autonomous Marxist Geographies 336 protests in Seattle, when anarchistic protesters exploded onto the international media landscape due to their successful application of direct action tactics to stop the trade ministerial meeting (De Armond, 2001; Sheppard, 2002; Graeber, 2004; Levi, 2006). That anarchism and autonomist Marxism have been deeply implicated in the alter-globalization movement of the past decade cannot be denied. For example, radical movements such as Ya Basta!, the edu-factory movement, European movements of students and precarious workers, and the contemporary Industrial Workers of the World union in the United States have integrated autonomist Marxist theory into their broadly anti-authoritarian and anarcho- syndicalist perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Diss 2
    Rupture and Representation: Migrant Workers, Unions and the State in China By Eli David Friedman A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Peter Evans, Chair Professor Kim Voss Professor Ching Kwan Lee Professor Kevin O’Brien Fall 2011 Abstract Rupture and Representation: Migrant Workers, Unions and the State in China By Eli David Friedman Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology University of California, Berkeley Professor Peter Evans, Chair This project begins with a simple observation: during the first decade of the 21st century, worker resistance in China continued to increase rapidly despite the fact that certain segments of the state began moving in a pro-labor direction. This poses a problem for the Polanyian theory of the countermovement, which conflates social resistance to the market with actual decommodification and incorporation of labor. I then pose the question, why is labor strong enough to win major legislative and policy concessions from the state, but not strong enough to significantly benefit from these policies? The “partial” nature of the countermovement can be explained with reference to the dynamics of labor politics in China, and specifically the relationship between migrant workers, unions, and the state, or what I refer to as “appropriated representation.” Because unions in China are an invention of the state, they have good access to policy makers but are highly illegitimate amongst their own membership, i.e. strong at the top, weak at the bottom. Labor’s impotence within enterprises means that pro-labor laws and collective agreements frequently go un-enforced.
    [Show full text]
  • Anarchist Theory, Critical Pedagogy, and Radical Possibilities Abraham P
    The time for action is now! Anarchist theory, critical pedagogy, and radical possibilities Abraham P. DeLeon University of Connecticut, USA "When the rich assemble to concern themselves with the business of the poor it is called charity. When the poor assemble to concern themselves with the business of the rich it is called anarchy." Paul Richard Rudolf Rocker (1989), a 19th century anarchist, proclaimed that anarchist theory was separate from a state driven, hierarchical socialism in that, “…when a revolutionary situation arises they [the people] will be capable of taking the socio-economic organism into their own hands and remaking it according to Socialist principles” (p. 86). Arising from the idea that small cooperatives of people could form without the need of a coercive and hierarchical state, Rocker envisioned a society that was based on cooperation, community participation, and mutual aid. Rocker’s vision of society, and other anarchist-communist (or anarcho-syndicalist) theorists, is especially relevant in a time that has seen a “war on terror” that was not supported by the global community, the rollback of civil liberties with legislation such as The Patriot Act, and educational laws such as No Child Left Behind that are focusing on narrowly-defined “standards” for public schooling. Historically, anarchists have been marginalized in academic literature, but have still been involved in radical political struggles throughout the world (Bowen, 2005; Chomsky, 2005; Day, 2004; Goaman, 2005). Within radical circles, anarchist literature has begun to gain popularity over the past several years (Bowen & Purkis, 2005). An anarchist presence can be seen in the anti-globalization movement, the “Black Bloc” protests against the IMF and World Bank, and other smaller, localized resistance efforts such as Anti-Racist Action (ARA) and Food Not Bombs (Bowen, 2005; Goaman, 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • What Is an Insurrection? Destituent Power and Ontological Anarchy in Agamben and Stirner
    What is an Insurrection? Destituent power and ontological anarchy in Agamben and Stirner By Saul Newman Introduction The aim of this paper is to develop a theoretical understanding of the insurrection as a central concept in radical politics. If one looks at recent uprisings around the world – from Occupy Wall Street, to the Indignados in Spain, to ‘hacktivist’ networks like Anonymous - one observes a form of action and mobilisation reducible neither to simple acts of civil disobedience, nor to a revolutionary model of politics. Instead, these movements signify a kind of withdrawal from formal systems of power; their emphasis is more on the creation of autonomous political spaces and modes of interaction than on the construction of political agendas and the representation of demands to the state. By contrast the idea of revolution, as the seizure of political power by an organised vanguard party, seems less easy to appeal to today. Despite attempts recently by some political theorists to resuscitate and rethink the idea of the vanguard party as a mode of political organisation - particularly in the context of mass mobilisations like Occupy (see for instance Dean 2012) – others suggest that this has been entirely superseded by a new model of emancipatory politics, in which self-organisation and the desire for autonomy from state institutions are the defining features (Graeber 2009, 2014; Castells 2015). Whereas the revolution is an instrumental form of action which aims, through organised political force, to seize the reins of government and use state power to transform the totality of social relations – that is, to constitute a new society – insurrection works within the fabric of existing social relations, opening up spaces of resistance and autonomy that are in a sense immanent within it (see Caygill 2013, 199).
    [Show full text]
  • The Welfare State
    The Welfare State: Where Do We Go From Here? by Michael Walzer, Frances Fox Piven, Jean Bethke Elshtain, Joseph Schwartz, Margaret Weir will have to await further developments. They, out of their unique historic expe­ rience, have something to teach us, as EDITORIAL we have something to teach them. It seems that the socialization ofourecon­ omy and society has turned out to be a Democracy First, Economic Relations Later far more complex and drawn-out proc­ ess than many of us had hoped. But to brothers and sisters in Eastern Europe paraphrase Churchill's remark about A 11 across Eastern Europe, from about whether it is really capitalism democracy: democratic socialism is the the Baltic to the Bosphorus, the buzz they want. That's something they are worst possible goal, except when you words are now "democracy," "plural­ goingtohaveto find out for themselves. consider the alternatives. ism," "market economy." Other words They understand the evils from which -- Gordon Haskell enter the political discourse, but their they flee far better than the ones which use seems to depend more on how many await them. Life has taught them to DEMOCRATIC LEFT disbelieve anything they are told by their months have passed sinoo the great thaw Founding Editor ending the Stalinist ice age has reached rulers and to believe almost anything Michael Harrington (1928-1989) the particular country in question. As told them by those rulers' opponents Managing Editor time passes, "communism wilh a hu­ and enemies. They know that there is Sherri Levine man face" tends to give way to "social­ unemployment, poverty, crime, and Editorial Committtt ism," and that in turn to "social democ­ homelessness in the West, and that the Joanne Barkan racy" or just plain "democracy." rich and powerful dominate the media Neil McLaughlin The semantic changes express a real and the politics dependent on them.
    [Show full text]