Role of Transthoracic Ultrasound in Differentiation of the Causes of Pleural Thickening Khaled M
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
260 Original article Role of transthoracic ultrasound in differentiation of the causes of pleural thickening Khaled M. Kamel, Yasmine H. El-Hinnawy Objectives Pleural thickening is defined as the increase in Results There was a statistically significant relation between thickness of the pleura of more than 3 mm and can be caused the distribution either localized, diffuse, unilateral, or bilateral; by a wide range of diseases, either nonmalignant or the surface of the thickness; invasion of chest wall or malignant. Thoracic ultrasound has high sensitivity in diaphragm; the echogenicity; vascularity of the pleural assessing the pleura. thickness; and the presence of pleural effusion and its pattern on one hand and the diagnosis of pleural thickening on the Aim The aim of this study was to assess the role of thoracic other hand. There was insignificant statistical difference ultrasound in differentiation of the causes of pleural between pleural mesothelioma and pleural metastatic cases, thickening. and also there was insignificant statistical difference between Design A prospective study included 48 patients selected tuberculous and nonspecific infection cases. from the inpatient Chest Department, Kasr Al-Ainy Hospital, Conclusion The transthoracic ultrasound had a very good from January 2016 till October 2017. Patients diagnosed as predilection for the diagnosis of pleural thickening etiology having pleural thickening underwent thoracic ultrasound as whether malignant or nonmalignant. well as ultrasound-guided pleural biopsy by Tru-cut needle. Egypt J Bronchol 2018 12:260–265 Descriptive data were obtained including age and sex of the © 2018 Egyptian Journal of Bronchology patients. Thoracic ultrasound was done for the side of pleural thickening. The distribution of pleural thickness, either Egyptian Journal of Bronchology 2018 12:260–265 localized or diffuse; the surface; invasion of chest wall or Keywords: benign, malignant, pleural thickening, ultrasound diaphragm; the echogenicity and vascularity; and the presence of pleural effusion and its pattern were determined. Chest Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt The patients were classified into two main groups: Correspondence to Yasmine H. El-Hinnawy, MD, 16 El-Tayaran Street, Nasr nonmalignant (subclassified as tuberculous and nonspecific City, Cairo, 11759, Egypt. Tel: +20 122 233 7683; e-mail: [email protected] infection) and malignant cases (subclassified as mesothelioma and metastatic cases). Received 2 November 2017 Accepted 4 December 2017 Introduction Inclusion criteria Pleura is a serous membrane. It consists of parietal pleura Patients diagnosed as having pleural thickening and visceral pleura. Pleural thickening is defined as the and undergoing transthoracic ultrasound as well as increase inthickness ofthe pleuraofmorethan3 mm[1]. ultrasound-guided pleural biopsy by Tru-cut needle were included. There is quite a wide range of diseases that can cause pleural thickening. It can be either benign or malignant Exclusion criteria [2]. Benign pleural thickening can occur in pleuro- The exclusion criteria were the presence of pulmonary infection by either a specific organism as contraindication for pleural biopsy. in tuberculosis [3] or a nonspecific organism causing empyema [4]. Transthoracic ultrasound is now Descriptive data of the study population were obtained considered a gold standard radiological technique in including age and sex of the patients. studying the pleural diseases such as pleural thickening [5] with or without pleural effusion of different etiologies Examination was performed using a real-time [6]. It is the most sensitive and safe technique in detecting ultrasound scanner (Hitachi EUB-7000 with minimal pleural thickening or effusion [7]. 3.5 MHz convex probe transducer and 13 MHz linear probe transducer, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). All The aim of this study was to assess the role of transthoracic patients were examined in an upright sitting position or ultrasound in differentiation of the causes of pleural the lateral decubitus position. thickening. Patients and methods This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 A prospective study included 48 patients who were License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work selected from the Chest Department inpatients, Kasr non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new Al-Ainy Hospital, from January 2016 till October 2017. creations are licensed under the identical terms. © 2018 Egyptian Journal of Bronchology | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow DOI: 10.4103/ejb.ejb_109_17 Transthoracic ultrasound in pleural thickening Kamel and El-Hinnawy 261 We searched by transthoracic ultrasound for side Table 1 Descriptive data of the study population in the two of pleural thickening. The distribution of pleural main groups thickness either localized or diffuse, the surface, Nonmalignant Malignant P-value group (N=22) group (N=26) invasion of either chest wall or diaphragm, the echogenicity, vascularity, and the presence of pleural Age (years) effusion and its pattern were evaluated. Mean 44.045 57.423 0.0058* SD 18.574 11.503 Sex We classified the patients into two main groups Male 15 17 0.8376 (nonmalignant and malignant). The nonmalignant Female 7 9 cases were subclassified as tuberculous and nonspecific Pleural thickening (mm) infection, whereas malignant cases were subclassified as Mean 8.995 21.826 0.0001* mesothelioma and metastatic cases. SD 3.220 14.022 Side Unilateral 18 26 0.0231* Statistical methods Bilateral 4 0 Coding and entering of the data was done using the Distribution statistical package statistical package for the social Localized 2 9 0.0360* sciences, version 23 (SPSS; SPSS Inc., Chicago, Diffuse 20 17 Illinois, USA). Surface Smooth 22 0 0.00001* Data were summarized using mean and SD for Irregular 0 26 Invasion quantitative variables and frequencies (number of cases). Yes 0 19 0.00001* No 22 7 Comparisons between groups were done using unpaired Echogenicity t-test [8]. Echogenic 22 4 0.00001* Hypoechogenic 0 22 Comparison of numerical variables between more Vascularity than two groups was done using one-way analysis Avascular 3 0 0.0021* of variance test with post-hoc multiple two-group Scanty 16 8 Vascular 3 18 comparisons in normal data [9]. Statistical P Pleural effusion significant was considered when value was less No 0 10 0.0073* than 0.05. Mild 10 5 Moderate 12 7 Massive 0 4 Results Pleural effusion pattern The descriptive data among the two main groups No 0 10 0.0078* (nonmalignant and malignant) are shown in Table 1. Complex 20 12 A total of 48 patients formed the study population. septated Complex 24 nonseptated The nonmalignant cases were 22, whereas the *Statistically significant. malignant cases were 26. The mean±SD age was 44.045±18.574 in nonmalignant group, and it was with statistically significant difference (P=0.00001). 57.423±11.503 in malignant group, with statistically There was no invasion to the chest wall or significant difference (P=0.0058). The sex distribution diaphragm in all nonmalignant cases whereas seven did not show any statistical significance. The pleural malignant cases showed invasion (Fig. 3), and it was thickening mean±SD was 8.995±3.22 in nonmalignant statistically significant (P=0.00001). cases, and it was 21.826±14.022 in malignant cases, with statistically significant difference (P=0.0001). All All the nonmalignant cases showed echogenic pleural cases were unilateral in the malignant group, and a thickening, and 22 of the malignant cases showed majority in the nonmalignant group, with statistically hypoechogenic pleural thickening, with statistically significant difference (P=0.0231). significant difference (P=0.00001). The distribution was statistically significant (P=0.036). The pleural thickening in the nonmalignant cases can The pleural surface was smooth in all nonmalignant be avascular (3/22), scanty (16/22), and vascular (3/22) cases (Figs 1 and 2) and irregular in all malignant cases, unlike malignant cases (18/26), which it was vascular 262 Egyptian Journal of Bronchology, Vol. 12 No. 2, April-June 2018 Figure 1 A case of chronic nonspecific pleural inflammation and thickening. (a) Computed tomography chest mediastinal window showed right pleural effusion with pleural thickening. (b) High-frequency linear probe transthoracic ultrasound B-mode image showed complex septated pleural effusion with diffuse smooth pleural thickening. (c) High-frequency linear probe transthoracic ultrasound B-mode image with Doppler study showed poor vasculature in pleural thickening. Figure 2 A case of tuberculous pleural inflammation and thickening. (a) Computed tomography chest mediastinal window showed bilateral pleural effusion with pleural thickening. (b) High-frequency linear probe transthoracic ultrasound B-mode image showed complex septated pleural effusion with diffuse smooth pleural thickening. (c) High-frequency linear probe transthoracic ultrasound B-mode image with Doppler study showed good vasculature in pleural thickening. Figure 3 A case of right-sided mesothelioma. (a) Computed tomography chest mediastinal window showed right irregular pleural thickening. (b) High- frequency linear probe transthoracic ultrasound B-mode image showed irregular pleural thickening with sites of chest wall invasion. (c) High- frequency linear probe transthoracic ultrasound B-mode image with Doppler study