DOCSLIB.ORG

Corporate Responsibility Report 2015 RELX Group Is a World-Leading Provider of Information and Analytics for Professional and Business Customers Across Industries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Corporate Responsibility Report 2015 RELX Group Is a World-Leading Provider of Information and Analytics for Professional and Business Customers Across Industries Corporate Responsibility Report 2015 RELX Group is a world-leading provider of information and analytics for professional and business customers across industries. We help scientists make new discoveries, lawyers win cases, doctors save lives and insurance companies offer customers lower prices. We save taxpayers and consumers money by preventing fraud and help executives forge commercial relationships with their clients. In short, we enable our customers to make better decisions, get better results and be more productive. CONTACT DETAILS Your views are important to us. Please send your comments to [email protected] Or write to Dr Márcia Balisciano, Director, Corporate Responsibility, RELX Group, 1–3 Strand, London WC2N 5JR, United Kingdom. www.relx.com FOR MORE INFORMATION VISIT WWW.RELX.COM/CORPORATERESPONSIBILITY RELX Group Corporate Responsibility 2015 Contents 3 I ntroduction I Introduction ntroduction 4 4 Statement from Chief 7 – External engagement Executive Officer 8 Commitment to the United Nations Global Compact 5 Our business 9 2015 recognition 6 Our approach to corporate 10 2015 key CR data responsibility 11 2015–2016 CR objectives 7 – Internal engagement contributions O Our unique contributions unique ur 14 15 Why it matters 19 – Exhibitions 15 Sharing our unique contributions 20 – Across RELX Group 15 – Scientific, Technical & Medical 21 Objectives 17 – Risk & Business Analytics 18 – Legal Governance Governance 22 23 – Governance and reporting 25 – Tax, pensions and investments 23 – Our values 26 Objectives 24 – Ensuring the highest ethical standards P People eople 27 28 Why it matters 32 – Boundarylessness 34 – Absence 29 – Our workforce 32 – Training 34 – Well-being 30 Key issues 33 – Support and recognition 35 Objectives 30 – Listening 33 – Health and safety 30 – Promoting diversity 33 – Performance C Customers ustomers 36 37 Why it matters 39 – Data privacy and security 37 – Improving professional and 40 – Responding to customer needs business outcomes 40 – Access to information 39 Key issues 42 – Accessibility 39 – Editorial standards 42 Objectives C Community ommunity 43 44 Why it matters 48 – Community impact 44 Key issues 48 Objectives 44 – What we give 46 – RE Cares Month S Supply chain chain upply 49 50 Why it matters 53 – Celebrating good partners 51 Key issues 53 Objectives 51 – Upholding standards 52 – Supplier training and surveys E Environment nvironment 54 55 Why it matters 61 – Energy 55 – Risks and opportunities 62 – Water 57 Key issues 62 – Paper 57 – Our impact 63 – Waste 57 – Targets and standards 63 – Employee action 60 – Climate change 64 Objectives A Appendices ppendices 65 66 Appendix 1 – LBG assurance 69 Appendix 3 – Global Reporting statement 2015 Initiative Index 67 Appendix 2 – EY assurance 77 Credits statement 2015 RELX Group Corporate Responsibility 2015 Introduction 4 I ntroduction Statement from Chief Executive Officer ntroduction We facilitate the exchange of information that drives forward science and better health; reduces risk and fraud for industry, contributions O governments and civil society; promotes the rule of law and justice; unique ur and fosters communities across diverse sectors. These unique contributions map to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which aim to protect the planet and improve the lives of the world’s most vulnerable. To support their launch, in 2015 we produced Sustainability Science in a Global Landscape, a first-of-its-kind, free resource to explore the state of research underpinning the SDGs. The report highlights opportunities for Governance greater collaboration between the global north and south, and among developing countries. It also shows areas, like justice, where research output could be increased. During the year, we also worked with the UN Global Compact (UNGC) on Business for the Rule of Law, new guidance to help companies go beyond legal minimums to strengthen the frameworks necessary for development. It was a tangible way we demonstrated our Erik Engstrom commitment to the UNGC’s 10 principles – encompassing human People Chief Executive Officer rights, labour, the environment and anti-bribery – which form the basis of the ethics documents that underpin our business and our “What we do impacts the world. relationships with suppliers. So if what we do impacts the world, how we do it matters too. We Our products and services shed heard from our people, investors and government in the year on the issues they feel are most material to our business. We set relevant light on some of the most pressing objectives and made progress on governance, including enhancing Customers trade sanctions and export controls compliance; people, mapping global issues. We must pursue the internal practice against the UN’s Women’s Empowerment Principles; customers, conducting more than 20 Quality First risk highest levels of corporate assessments to ensure the excellence of our content and services; community, encouraging nearly 80% of staff to participate in RE responsibility to benefit our Cares Month volunteering around the globe; supply chain, conducting 77 comprehensive workplace conditions assessment Community stakeholders and ensure our long- audits; and environment, securing half of our electricity needs term sustainability.” from renewable energy or Renewable Energy Certificates. We know we can do more and in the year ahead, for the first time, we will set objectives for each of our unique contributions, and share our longer-term vision, including creation of a new SDG Resource Centre to aid scientific communities and the public. To address our key impact areas in 2016, we will develop a compliance S plan for new EU data protection regulations, expand diversity and chain upply inclusion employee resource groups, broaden our Quality First Principles to cover more areas such as customer support, involve at least 60% of staff in our new global fundraising partnership, strive to increase the number of core suppliers as signatories to our Supplier Code and get started on reaching our new five-year environmental targets. E We will need the support of all our stakeholders to help us achieve nvironment RELX Group’s collective goals in the year ahead. Erik Engstrom Chief Executive Officer A ppendices RELX Group Corporate Responsibility 2015 Introduction 5 I ntroduction Our business ntroduction Market segments* Segment Position contributions O ur unique ur Scientific, Technical & Medical helps customers advance science and improve healthcare by Global #1 providing world-class information and analytical solutions that enable them to make critical decisions, enhance productivity and improve outcomes. Risk & Business Analytics provides solutions and decision tools that combine public and Key verticals #1 industry-specific content with advanced technology and analytics. These solutions assist business and government customers in evaluating and predicting risk, making more informed decisions, Governance reducing fraud and enhancing operational efficiency. Legal is a leading provider of information and analytics to professionals in legal, corporate, US #2 government and non-profit organisations. Outside US #1 or 2 Exhibitions organises more than 500 exhibitions a year, attracting more than 7m attendees. Global #1 The events, and information tools provided, help exhibitors generate billions of dollars of revenues People while boosting the local economies where the events are hosted. * For additional information regarding revenue from our business activities and geographic markets, see the business review in the 2015 Annual Reports and Financial Statements. RELX PLC is a London listed holding company which owns 52.9% of RELX Group. RELX NV is the Amsterdam listed holding company which owns 47.1% of RELX Group. approximately with offices in about Customers 30,000 40 full-time employees… countries… Community across serving customers in 6 180+ S continents… countries worldwide chain upply REVENUE ADJUSTED OPERATING PROFIT £5,971m £1,822m E 14% 12% nvironment 35% Scientific, Scientific, Technical Technical & Medical 15% & Medical Risk & Business 42% Risk & Business Analytics Analytics Legal Legal 24% Exhibitions Exhibitions A ppendices 31% 27% FOR MORE INFORMATION, SEE BUSINESS REVIEW IN THE 2015 ANNUAL REPORTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT WWW.RELX.COM/GO/ANNUALREPORT RELX Group Corporate Responsibility 2015 Introduction 6 I ntroduction ntroduction Our approach to corporate responsibility Our vision is to be a world-leading provider of information contributions O solutions that improve outcomes for our professional customers unique ur and benefit society. To achieve this, we must exercise the full extent of our corporate responsibility (CR), performing to the highest ethical standards and channelling our knowledge and strengths as a global leader in our industry to make a difference. At RELX Group, CR is not a programme or prescriptive set of activities, it is how we do what we do on a daily basis – working to Governance maximise our positive impact, while minimising any negative consequences of conducting our business. This focus adds to our competitive advantage by building good relations with current and future employees, customers and investors, as well as governments, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and the communities in which we live and work. Dr Márcia Balisciano CR underpins our business strategy to deliver improved outcomes People Director, Corporate Responsibility for our customers by combining content and data with
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guardian News & Media
    Response to Ofcom consultations on the BBC’s commercial activities and assessing the impact of the BBC’s public service activities About Guardian News & Media Guardian Media Group (GMG), a leading commercial media organisation, is the owner of Guardian News & Media (GNM) which publishes theguardian.com and the Guardian and Observer newspapers. Wholly owned by The Scott Trust Ltd, which exists to secure the financial and editorial independence of the Guardian in perpetuity, GMG is one of the few British-owned newspaper companies and is one of Britain's most successful global digital businesses, with operations in the USA and Australia and a rapidly growing audience around the world. As well as being a leading national quality newspapers, the Guardian and The Observer have championed a highly distinctive, open approach to publishing on the web and have sought global audience growth as a priority. A key consequence of this approach has been a huge growth in global readership, as theguardian.com has grown to become one of the world’s leading quality English language newspaper website in the world, with over 156 million monthly unique browsers. From its roots as a regional news brand, the Guardian now flies the flag for Britain and its media industry on the global stage. Introduction GMG is a strong supporter of the BBC, its core values of public service and its contribution to British public life. GMG supports the fundamentals of the BBC in its current form and a universal service funded through a universal levy, at least for the period covered by the next BBC Charter.
    [Show full text]
  • Bias at the Beeb?
    Pointmaker BIAS AT THE BEEB? A QUANTITATIVE STUDY OF SLANT IN BBC ONLINE REPORTING OLIVER LATHAM SUMMARY This paper uses objective, quantitative of coverage by the BBC than is coverage in methods, based on the existing academic The Daily Telegraph. literature on media bias, to look for evidence Once we control for coverage of a think-tank of slant in the BBC’s online reporting. in The Guardian, the number of hits a think- These methods minimise the need for tank received in The Daily Telegraph has no subjective judgements of the content of the statistically significant correlation with its BBC’s news output to be made. As such, they coverage by the BBC. are less susceptible to accusations of This paper then looks at the “health partiality on the part of the author than many warnings” given to think-tanks of different previous studies. ideological persuasions when they are The paper first examines 40 think-tanks mentioned on the BBC website. which the BBC cited online between 1 June It finds that right-of-centre think-tanks are far 2010 and 31 May 2013 and compares the more likely to receive health warnings than number of citations to those of The Guardian their left-of-centre counterparts (the former and The Daily Telegraph newspapers. received health warnings between 23% and In a statistical sense, the BBC cites these 61% of the time while the latter received think-tanks “more similarly” to that of The them between 0% and 12% of the time). Guardian than that of The Daily Telegraph.
    [Show full text]
  • Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020
    Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Nic Newman with Richard Fletcher, Anne Schulz, Simge Andı, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Supported by Surveyed by © Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism / Digital News Report 2020 4 Contents Foreword by Rasmus Kleis Nielsen 5 3.15 Netherlands 76 Methodology 6 3.16 Norway 77 Authorship and Research Acknowledgements 7 3.17 Poland 78 3.18 Portugal 79 SECTION 1 3.19 Romania 80 Executive Summary and Key Findings by Nic Newman 9 3.20 Slovakia 81 3.21 Spain 82 SECTION 2 3.22 Sweden 83 Further Analysis and International Comparison 33 3.23 Switzerland 84 2.1 How and Why People are Paying for Online News 34 3.24 Turkey 85 2.2 The Resurgence and Importance of Email Newsletters 38 AMERICAS 2.3 How Do People Want the Media to Cover Politics? 42 3.25 United States 88 2.4 Global Turmoil in the Neighbourhood: 3.26 Argentina 89 Problems Mount for Regional and Local News 47 3.27 Brazil 90 2.5 How People Access News about Climate Change 52 3.28 Canada 91 3.29 Chile 92 SECTION 3 3.30 Mexico 93 Country and Market Data 59 ASIA PACIFIC EUROPE 3.31 Australia 96 3.01 United Kingdom 62 3.32 Hong Kong 97 3.02 Austria 63 3.33 Japan 98 3.03 Belgium 64 3.34 Malaysia 99 3.04 Bulgaria 65 3.35 Philippines 100 3.05 Croatia 66 3.36 Singapore 101 3.06 Czech Republic 67 3.37 South Korea 102 3.07 Denmark 68 3.38 Taiwan 103 3.08 Finland 69 AFRICA 3.09 France 70 3.39 Kenya 106 3.10 Germany 71 3.40 South Africa 107 3.11 Greece 72 3.12 Hungary 73 SECTION 4 3.13 Ireland 74 References and Selected Publications 109 3.14 Italy 75 4 / 5 Foreword Professor Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Director, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (RISJ) The coronavirus crisis is having a profound impact not just on Our main survey this year covered respondents in 40 markets, our health and our communities, but also on the news media.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital News Report 2018 Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism / Digital News Report 2018 2 2 / 3
    1 Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2018 Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism / Digital News Report 2018 2 2 / 3 Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2018 Nic Newman with Richard Fletcher, Antonis Kalogeropoulos, David A. L. Levy and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Supported by Surveyed by © Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism / Digital News Report 2018 4 Contents Foreword by David A. L. Levy 5 3.12 Hungary 84 Methodology 6 3.13 Ireland 86 Authorship and Research Acknowledgements 7 3.14 Italy 88 3.15 Netherlands 90 SECTION 1 3.16 Norway 92 Executive Summary and Key Findings by Nic Newman 8 3.17 Poland 94 3.18 Portugal 96 SECTION 2 3.19 Romania 98 Further Analysis and International Comparison 32 3.20 Slovakia 100 2.1 The Impact of Greater News Literacy 34 3.21 Spain 102 2.2 Misinformation and Disinformation Unpacked 38 3.22 Sweden 104 2.3 Which Brands do we Trust and Why? 42 3.23 Switzerland 106 2.4 Who Uses Alternative and Partisan News Brands? 45 3.24 Turkey 108 2.5 Donations & Crowdfunding: an Emerging Opportunity? 49 Americas 2.6 The Rise of Messaging Apps for News 52 3.25 United States 112 2.7 Podcasts and New Audio Strategies 55 3.26 Argentina 114 3.27 Brazil 116 SECTION 3 3.28 Canada 118 Analysis by Country 58 3.29 Chile 120 Europe 3.30 Mexico 122 3.01 United Kingdom 62 Asia Pacific 3.02 Austria 64 3.31 Australia 126 3.03 Belgium 66 3.32 Hong Kong 128 3.04 Bulgaria 68 3.33 Japan 130 3.05 Croatia 70 3.34 Malaysia 132 3.06 Czech Republic 72 3.35 Singapore 134 3.07 Denmark 74 3.36 South Korea 136 3.08 Finland 76 3.37 Taiwan 138 3.09 France 78 3.10 Germany 80 SECTION 4 3.11 Greece 82 Postscript and Further Reading 140 4 / 5 Foreword Dr David A.
    [Show full text]
  • From Corporate Responsibility to Corporate Accountability
    Hastings Business Law Journal Volume 16 Number 1 Winter 2020 Article 3 Winter 2020 From Corporate Responsibility to Corporate Accountability Min Yan Daoning Zhang Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_business_law_journal Part of the Business Organizations Law Commons Recommended Citation Min Yan and Daoning Zhang, From Corporate Responsibility to Corporate Accountability, 16 Hastings Bus. L.J. 43 (2020). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_business_law_journal/vol16/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Business Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 2 - YAN _ZHANG - V9 - KC - 10.27.19.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 11/15/2019 11:11 AM From Corporate Responsibility to Corporate Accountability Min Yan* and Daoning Zhang** I. INTRODUCTION The concept of corporate responsibility or corporate social responsibility (“CSR”) keeps evolving since it appeared. The emphasis was first placed on business people’s social conscience rather than on the company itself, which was well reflected by Howard Bowen’s landmark book, Social Responsibilities of the Businessman.1 Then CSR was defined as responsibilities to society, which extends beyond economic and legal obligations by corporations.2 Since then, corporate responsibility is thought to begin where the law ends. 3 In other words, the concept of social responsibility largely excludes legal obedience from the concept of social responsibility. An analysis of 37 of the most used definitions of CSR also shows “voluntary” as one of the most common dimensions.4 Put differently, corporate responsibility reflects the belief that corporations have duties beyond generating profits for their shareholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Governance and Responsibility Foundations of Market Integrity
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Spotlight OECD principles Corporate governance and responsibility Foundations of market integrity Bill Witherell, Head, OECD Directorate for Financial, Fiscal and Enterprise Affairs © Getty Images Good governance goes he recent spate of US corporate investment assessments followed by a sharp beyond common sense. It is failures and breakdowns in truthful market correction that spelt the end for a key part of the contract Taccounting has undermined people’s thousands of high-tech wannabes. Still, it is faith in financial reporting, corporate difficult to disentangle the negative effects that underpins economic leadership, and the integrity of markets the these two parallel developments have had on growth in a market economy world over. The fact that the wave of the confidence of investors. scandals has come hot on the heels of a and public faith in that collapse in the high-tech bubble has a sharp With the bursting of the high-tech bubble, system. The OECD ironic flavour. Both events have their roots in share values were written down and venture Principles of Corporate the heady days of stock market exuberance, capitalists took a bruising, as did many when anything was possible, from creating shareholders. That is the downside of Governance and Guidelines multibillion dollar companies with little committing resources to investments with a for Multinational more than an idea, an investment angel and high risk/high reward profile. But in the cases Enterprises are two a lot of faith, to believing that markets would of corporate misbehaviour, the public, buy any yarn a group of fast-talking employees and pensioners were deliberately essential instruments for executives could spin, even if to cover up misled.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Behaviour
    CORPORATE BEHAVIOUR Sustainability Focus Report 2016 As a major international company in a controversial sector, we are focused on creating shared value for our business and society, while continuing to work to address the health impacts of our products. A strategic approach to sustainability Our sustainability agenda focuses on the three key areas which have the greatest significance to our business and our stakeholders. Harm Sustainable Corporate Reduction Agriculture and Behaviour We are committed Farmer Livelihoods We are committed to researching, We are committed to operating to the developing and to working to enable highest standards of commercialising less prosperous livelihoods corporate conduct risky alternatives to for all farmers who and transparency. regular cigarettes. supply our tobacco leaf. Performance across all three areas can be found in our annual Sustainability Summary report. In addition, we periodically produce individual focus reports on each area. At the end of 2014, we published two reports covering Harm Reduction and Sustainable Agriculture and Farmer Livelihoods. This 2016 report covers Corporate Behaviour which underpins every area of our business. In this report 02 MARKETING RESPONSIBLY 03 CONTRIBUTING TO COMMUNITIES 04 STRENGTHENING OUR APPROACH TO HUMAN RIGHTS 06 PROMOTING STANDARDS FOR VAPOUR PRODUCTS 08 SAFEGUARDING OUR PEOPLE 09 COLLABORATING TO TACKLE THE ILLEGAL TOBACCO TRADE 10 REDUCING OUR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 12 UPHOLDING HIGH STANDARDS OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE www.bat.com/sustainability OPERATING TO THE HIGHEST STANDARDS OF CORPORATE CONDUCT Sustainability is one of the key pillars of This is reflected through the many industry-leading our Group strategy and I see it as crucial practices we have in place, such as our approaches to our long-term success.
    [Show full text]
  • Duties of the Guardian of the Estate of an Incapacitated Person
    DUTIES OF THE GUARDIAN OF THE ESTATE OF AN INCAPACITATED PERSON The following outline is not intended to be taken as specific legal advice upon any particular occasion for which the advice of qualified counsel is recommended. Please do not ask Court personnel to give legal advice on specific issues as they are not permitted nor qualified to do so. As Guardian of the Estate of an Incapacitated Person your duties are: 1. FAMILIARITY WITH COURT ORDER APPOINTING YOU You must examine and be familiar with the Court Order which appoints you Guardian of the Estate of the Incapacitated Person. This is particularly true in that you may only be authorized to exercise power in certain limited ways, unless you have been appointed "plenary" (general) Guardian of the Estate. If your appointment is subject to limitations, you must not exceed those limitations. You must also determine whether you have been directed to enter Bond (insurance) and if so, you must provide for the entry of an appropriate sized Bond before undertaking any of your duties. In every case, the following list of duties must be limited by the terms of the Order appointing you. 2. INQUIRY AND DISCOVERY OF ASSETS You must make reasonable inquiry into the existence and whereabouts of all valuable assets of the Incapacitated Person, including the determination of their fair market value on the date of your appointment, which may require appraisals of realty, personal, or statements from banks or securities firms as to values of accounts and securities, or appraisals of antiques or jewelry. 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Moral Disengagement in Supply Chain Management Research
    http://www.diva-portal.org Postprint This is the accepted version of a paper published in European Business Review. This paper has been peer-reviewed but does not include the final publisher proof-corrections or journal pagination. Citation for the original published paper (version of record): Eriksson, D. (2016) The role of moral disengagement in supply chain management research. European Business Review, 28(3): 274-284 https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-05-2015-0047 Access to the published version may require subscription. N.B. When citing this work, cite the original published paper. Permanent link to this version: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-34076 The Role of Moral Disengagement in Supply Chain Management Research Paper Type: Conceptual Structured abstract Purpose: To elucidate the role of moral disengagement in supply chain management (SCM) research, and challenges if the theory is to be used outside of its limitations. Design/methodology/approach: Conceptual paper based on how Bandura has developed and used moral disengagement. Findings: Moral disengagement can be used in SCM research. The theory is not to be applied to the supply chain itself, but SCM can be seen as the environment that is part of a reciprocal exchange that shapes human behavior. Research limitations/implications: The paper suggests a new theory to better understand business ethics, corporate social responsibility, and sustainability in SCM. Further, the paper outlines how the theory should be used, and some challenges that still remain. Practical implications: Originality/value: SCM researchers are given support on how to transfer a theory from psychology to SCM, which could help to progress several areas of the research field.
    [Show full text]
  • Organizational Stakeholders, Management, and Ethics
    PAR T I The Organization and Its Environment Organizational Stakeholders, CHAPTER Management, and Ethics 2 Learning Objectives Business and service organizations exist to create valued goods and services that people need or desire. Organizations may have either a profit or nonprofit orientation for the creation of these goods or services. But who decides which particular goods and services an organization should provide, and how do you divide the value that an organization creates among different groups of people such as management, employees, customers, shareholders, and other stakeholders? If people primarily behave self-interestedly, what mecha- nisms or procedures govern the way an organization uses its resources, and what is to stop the different groups within the organization from trying to maximize their own share of the value created, possibly at the detriment or expense of others? At a time when the issue of corporate ethics and management dishonesty and greed has come under intense scrutiny, these questions must be addressed before the issue of design- ing an organization to increase its effectiveness can be investigated. After studying this chapter you should be able to: 1. Identify the various stakeholder groups and their 4. Describe the agency problem that exists in all interests or claims on an organization, its activi- authority relationships and the various mecha- ties, and its created value. nisms, such as the board of directors and 2. Understand the choices and problems inherent stock options, that can be used to align man- in apportioning and distributing the value an agerial behaviour with organizational goals or organization creates. to help control illegal and unethical managerial behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisions to Digital Radio Technical Codes Statement Following Consultation
    Revisions to Digital Radio Technical Codes Statement following consultation STATEMENT: Publication Date: 11 June 2019 Contents Section 1. Overview 1 2. Introduction 3 3. Adjacent Channel Interference (ACI) and blocking processes 7 4. Spectrum masks for DAB 15 5. DAB+ audio encoding 18 6. Digital Radio Technical Code: other proposed revisions 21 7. Technical Policy Guidance for DAB Multiplex Licensees: other proposed revisions 27 8. Other issues raised by respondents 28 Revisions to Digital Radio Technical Codes: Statement following consultation 1. Overview Ofcom published a consultation on 4 February 2019 which proposed making changes to the existing technical rules that the UK’s DAB digital radio broadcasters are required to comply with as a condition of their licences. We proposed these changes with the aim of ensuring that our rules remained appropriate and proportionate. The consultation closed on 28 March 2019, and we received 28 responses to our proposals from industry stakeholders and members of the public. We have considered all of the points raised by respondents, and we have made certain revisions to our proposed changes in light of the comments that we received. This Statement concludes the consultation process, sets out our analysis of the points raised by respondents, and includes our final decision on the proposed changes to the technical codes. The new Technical Code documents1 will come into force today (11 June 2019). 1 https://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv-radio-and-on-demand/information-for-industry/guidance/DAB-Technical-Policy- Documents 1 Revisions to Digital Radio Technical Codes: Statement following consultation What we have decided – in brief The main changes that we have decided to make are in the following areas: ACI/blocking procedures We are proceeding with the changes that we proposed in relation to the management of ‘Adjacent Channel Interference’ (ACI) and 'blocking’, which are technical effects that can disrupt reception of existing DAB stations when new DAB transmitters are built.
    [Show full text]
  • Response from Bauer Radio – 'An Approach to DAB Coverage Planning' 1. This Is a Response by Bauer Radio to the Ofcom Cons
    Bauer Media – Digital Radio Response to Ofcom Consultation – ‘An approach to DAB Coverage planning’ V 110914-13 Response from Bauer Radio – ‘An approach to DAB Coverage Planning’ 1. This is a response by Bauer Radio to the Ofcom Consultation ‘An approach to DAB Coverage Planning’ 2. Bauer Radio is a major player in UK commercial radio; actively engaged as a content provider on analogue and digital platforms and as a DAB multiplex operator. a. We operate 12 DAB multiplex licences mostly in major metropolitan markets in Scotland, England and Northern Ireland (total licence area 28% of UK households). We are a 50:50 JV partner in CE Digital, the DAB licensee for London, Birmingham and Manchester (total licence area 29% of UK households). b. We operate 41 local analogue radio licences, of which 37 are simulcast on DAB. We also provide national radio services on DAB, Freeview, Sky, Internet and Mobile radio platforms. ‘The Hits’ radio service operated by Bauer reaches more listeners than any other commercial digital-only radio service (Rajar W2 2011). c. Bauer operates Radio services on 37 of the current 38 local DAB multiplexes. d. Our extensive and longstanding involvement demonstrates our on-going support for digital radio broadcasting across a range of platforms and content genre. 3. Bauer welcomes the opportunity to comment on some aspects of the approach taken by Ofcom to planning DAB for a possible future switchover from analogue broadcasting to DAB for national and metropolitan based local stations. 4. In the consultation, Ofcom asked for 6 specific questions to be addressed.
    [Show full text]