(Polyphaga, Chrysomelidae) Amália Torrez
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks Bioblitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 ON THIS PAGE Photograph of BioBlitz participants conducting data entry into iNaturalist. Photograph courtesy of the National Park Service. ON THE COVER Photograph of BioBlitz participants collecting aquatic species data in the Presidio of San Francisco. Photograph courtesy of National Park Service. The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 Elizabeth Edson1, Michelle O’Herron1, Alison Forrestel2, Daniel George3 1Golden Gate Parks Conservancy Building 201 Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94129 2National Park Service. Golden Gate National Recreation Area Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1061 Sausalito, CA 94965 3National Park Service. San Francisco Bay Area Network Inventory & Monitoring Program Manager Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1063 Sausalito, CA 94965 March 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. -
Final Report 1
Sand pit for Biodiversity at Cep II quarry Researcher: Klára Řehounková Research group: Petr Bogusch, David Boukal, Milan Boukal, Lukáš Čížek, František Grycz, Petr Hesoun, Kamila Lencová, Anna Lepšová, Jan Máca, Pavel Marhoul, Klára Řehounková, Jiří Řehounek, Lenka Schmidtmayerová, Robert Tropek Březen – září 2012 Abstract We compared the effect of restoration status (technical reclamation, spontaneous succession, disturbed succession) on the communities of vascular plants and assemblages of arthropods in CEP II sand pit (T řebo ňsko region, SW part of the Czech Republic) to evaluate their biodiversity and conservation potential. We also studied the experimental restoration of psammophytic grasslands to compare the impact of two near-natural restoration methods (spontaneous and assisted succession) to establishment of target species. The sand pit comprises stages of 2 to 30 years since site abandonment with moisture gradient from wet to dry habitats. In all studied groups, i.e. vascular pants and arthropods, open spontaneously revegetated sites continuously disturbed by intensive recreation activities hosted the largest proportion of target and endangered species which occurred less in the more closed spontaneously revegetated sites and which were nearly absent in technically reclaimed sites. Out results provide clear evidence that the mosaics of spontaneously established forests habitats and open sand habitats are the most valuable stands from the conservation point of view. It has been documented that no expensive technical reclamations are needed to restore post-mining sites which can serve as secondary habitats for many endangered and declining species. The experimental restoration of rare and endangered plant communities seems to be efficient and promising method for a future large-scale restoration projects in abandoned sand pits. -
Chrysomela 43.10-8-04
CHRYSOMELA newsletter Dedicated to information about the Chrysomelidae Report No. 43.2 July 2004 INSIDE THIS ISSUE Fabreries in Fabreland 2- Editor’s Page St. Leon, France 2- In Memoriam—RP 3- In Memoriam—JAW 5- Remembering John Wilcox Statue of 6- Defensive Strategies of two J. H. Fabre Cassidine Larvae. in the garden 7- New Zealand Chrysomelidae of the Fabre 9- Collecting in Sholas Forests Museum, St. 10- Fun With Flea Beetle Feces Leons, France 11- Whither South African Cassidinae Research? 12- Indian Cassidinae Revisited 14- Neochlamisus—Cryptic Speciation? 16- In Memoriam—JGE 16- 17- Fabreries in Fabreland 18- The Duckett Update 18- Chrysomelidists at ESA: 2003 & 2004 Meetings 19- Recent Chrysomelid Literature 21- Email Address List 23- ICE—Phytophaga Symposium 23- Chrysomela Questionnaire See Story page 17 Research Activities and Interests Johan Stenberg (Umeå Univer- Duane McKenna (Harvard Univer- Eduard Petitpierre (Palma de sity, Sweden) Currently working on sity, USA) Currently studying phyloge- Mallorca, Spain) Interested in the cy- coevolutionary interactions between ny, ecological specialization, population togenetics, cytotaxonomy and chromo- the monophagous leaf beetles, Altica structure, and speciation in the genus somal evolution of Palearctic leaf beetles engstroemi and Galerucella tenella, and Cephaloleia. Needs Arescini and especially of chrysomelines. Would like their common host plant Filipendula Cephaloleini in ethanol, especially from to borrow or exchange specimens from ulmaria (meadow sweet) in a Swedish N. Central America and S. America. Western Palearctic areas. Archipelago. Amanda Evans (Harvard University, Maria Lourdes Chamorro-Lacayo Stefano Zoia (Milan, Italy) Inter- USA) Currently working on a phylogeny (University of Minnesota, USA) Cur- ested in Old World Eumolpinae and of Leptinotarsa to study host use evolu- rently a graduate student working on Mediterranean Chrysomelidae (except tion. -
Morphology of the Male Reproductive Tract in the Water Scavenger Beetle Tropisternus Collaris Fabricius, 1775 (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae)
Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 65(2):e20210012, 2021 Morphology of the male reproductive tract in the water scavenger beetle Tropisternus collaris Fabricius, 1775 (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) Vinícius Albano Araújo1* , Igor Luiz Araújo Munhoz2, José Eduardo Serrão3 1Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Biodiversidade e Sustentabilidade (NUPEM), Macaé, RJ, Brasil. 2Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil. 3Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Viçosa, MG, Brasil. ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: Members of the Hydrophilidae, one of the largest families of aquatic insects, are potential models for the Received 07 February 2021 biomonitoring of freshwater habitats and global climate change. In this study, we describe the morphology of Accepted 19 April 2021 the male reproductive tract in the water scavenger beetle Tropisternus collaris. The reproductive tract in sexually Available online 12 May 2021 mature males comprised a pair of testes, each with at least 30 follicles, vasa efferentia, vasa deferentia, seminal Associate Editor: Marcela Monné vesicles, two pairs of accessory glands (a bean-shaped pair and a tubular pair with a forked end), and an ejaculatory duct. Characters such as the number of testicular follicles and accessory glands, as well as their shape, origin, and type of secretion, differ between Coleoptera taxa and have potential to help elucidate reproductive strategies and Keywords: the evolutionary history of the group. Accessory glands Hydrophilid Polyphaga Reproductive system Introduction Coleoptera is the most diverse group of insects in the current fauna, The evolutionary history of Coleoptera diversity (Lawrence et al., with about 400,000 described species and still thousands of new species 1995; Lawrence, 2016) has been grounded in phylogenies with waiting to be discovered (Slipinski et al., 2011; Kundrata et al., 2019). -
Coleoptera Chrysomelidae) of Sicily: Recent Records and Updated Checklist
DOI: 10.1478/AAPP.982A7 AAPP j Atti della Accademia Peloritana dei Pericolanti Classe di Scienze Fisiche, Matematiche e Naturali ISSN 1825-1242 Vol. 98, No. 2, A7 (2020) THE CASSIDINAE AND CRYPTOCEPHALINI (COLEOPTERA CHRYSOMELIDAE) OF SICILY: RECENT RECORDS AND UPDATED CHECKLIST COSIMO BAVIERA a∗ AND DAVIDE SASSI b ABSTRACT. This paper compiles an updated checklist of the Sicilian Cassidinae and Cryptocephalini species (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae, Cassidinae and Cryptocephalinae) starting from a critical bibliographic screening and adding new material, mainly collected by the first author in the last few decades. A total of 61 species is reported, withnew data for many rarely collected taxa. The provided data expand the known distribution of many uncommon species in Sicily. Two species are recorded for the first time: Cassida inopinata Sassi and Borowiec, 2006 and Cryptocephalus (Cryptocephalus) bimaculatus Fabricius, 1781 and two uncertain presences are confirmed: Cassida deflorata Suffrian, 1844 and Cassida nobilis Linné, 1758. The presence of other sixteen species is considered questionable and needs further confirmation. 1. Introduction Leaf beetles are all phytophagous Coleoptera. They are usually of a rather stout build, with a rounded or oval shape, often brightly coloured or with metallic hues. Worldwide some 32500 species in 2114 genera of Chrysomelidae have been described (Slipi´ nski´ et al. 2011), the majority of which occur in the tropics as is the case with numerous other Coleoptera families. Currently, the leaf beetle subfamily Cassidinae comprises the tortoise beetles (Cassidinae s. str.) and the hispine beetles (Hispinae s. str.) (Borowiec 1995; Hsiao and Windsor 1999; Chaboo 2007). So far, the Cassidinae list about 6300 described species within more than 340 genera, being the second most speciose subfamily of leaf beetles (Borowiec and Swi˛etoja´ nska´ 2014). -
Barcoding Chrysomelidae: a Resource for Taxonomy and Biodiversity Conservation in the Mediterranean Region
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 597:Barcoding 27–38 (2016) Chrysomelidae: a resource for taxonomy and biodiversity conservation... 27 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.597.7241 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Barcoding Chrysomelidae: a resource for taxonomy and biodiversity conservation in the Mediterranean Region Giulia Magoga1,*, Davide Sassi2, Mauro Daccordi3, Carlo Leonardi4, Mostafa Mirzaei5, Renato Regalin6, Giuseppe Lozzia7, Matteo Montagna7,* 1 Via Ronche di Sopra 21, 31046 Oderzo, Italy 2 Centro di Entomologia Alpina–Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy 3 Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona, lungadige Porta Vittoria 9, 37129 Verona, Italy 4 Museo di Storia Naturale di Milano, Corso Venezia 55, 20121 Milano, Italy 5 Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources–University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran 6 Dipartimento di Scienze per gli Alimenti, la Nutrizione e l’Ambiente–Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy 7 Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Ambientali–Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy Corresponding authors: Matteo Montagna ([email protected]) Academic editor: J. Santiago-Blay | Received 20 November 2015 | Accepted 30 January 2016 | Published 9 June 2016 http://zoobank.org/4D7CCA18-26C4-47B0-9239-42C5F75E5F42 Citation: Magoga G, Sassi D, Daccordi M, Leonardi C, Mirzaei M, Regalin R, Lozzia G, Montagna M (2016) Barcoding Chrysomelidae: a resource for taxonomy and biodiversity conservation in the Mediterranean Region. In: Jolivet P, Santiago-Blay J, Schmitt M (Eds) Research on Chrysomelidae 6. ZooKeys 597: 27–38. doi: 10.3897/ zookeys.597.7241 Abstract The Mediterranean Region is one of the world’s biodiversity hot-spots, which is also characterized by high level of endemism. -
Bugs & Beasties of the Western Rhodopes
Bugs and Beasties of the Western Rhodopes (a photoguide to some lesser-known species) by Chris Gibson and Judith Poyser [email protected] Yagodina At Honeyguide, we aim to help you experience the full range of wildlife in the places we visit. Generally we start with birds, flowers and butterflies, but we don’t ignore 'other invertebrates'. In the western Rhodopes they are just so abundant and diverse that they are one of the abiding features of the area. While simply experiencing this diversity is sufficient for some, as naturalists many of us want to know more, and in particular to be able to give names to what we see. Therein lies the problem: especially in eastern Europe, there are few books covering the invertebrates in any comprehensive way. Hence this photoguide – while in no way can this be considered an ‘eastern Chinery’, it at least provides a taster of the rich invertebrate fauna you may encounter, based on a couple of Honeyguide holidays we have led in the western Rhodopes during June. We stayed most of the time in a tight area around Yagodina, and almost anything we saw could reasonably be expected to be seen almost anywhere around there in the right habitat. Most of the photos were taken in 2014, with a few additional ones from 2012. While these creatures have found their way into the lists of the holiday reports, relatively few have been accompanied by photos. We have attempted to name the species depicted, using the available books and the vast resources of the internet, but in many cases it has not been possible to be definitive and the identifications should be treated as a ‘best fit’. -
Three New Species of the Genus Stolas Billberg, 1820 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cassidinae: Stolaini)
Genus Vol. 18(4): 661-670 Wrocław, 28 XII 2007 Papers Celebrating the 80th Birthday of Professor anDrzej warcHałowski Three new species of the genus Stolas BILLBERG, 1820 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cassidinae: Stolaini) LECH BOROWIEC Department of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Taxonomy, Institute of Zoology, University of Wrocław, Przybyszewskiego 63/77, 51-148 Wrocław, Poland, e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Stolas hameli from Bolivia, Stolas omaspidiformis from Brazil and Stolas warchalowskii from Paraguay, all new to science, are described and photographed. Key words: entomology, taxonomy, new species, Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Cassidinae, Stolas, Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay. InTroDUCTIon The genus Stolas BILLBERG, 1820 in the narrow sense contains 178 species distributed in the neotropical region and is the fourth most diverse genus within tortoise beetles (BOROWIEC 1999, BOROWIEC & Świętojańska 2002). Several authors (e.g. Hincks 1952, SEENO and WILCOX 1982) included in the genus Stolas also some other stolaine genera at the subgenus level: Anacassis SPAETH, 1913 (19 species), Botanochara Dejean, 1837 (43 species), Cyrtonota CHEVROLAT, 1837 (60 species), Mesomphalia HOPE, 1839 (16 species), Nebraspis SPAETH, 1913 (3 species), Poecilaspidella SPAETH, 1913 (6 species), Trilaccodea SPAETH, 1920 (6 species) and Xenicomorpha SPAETH, 1913 (1 species). The genus Stolas in broad sense contains 332 species and is exceeded in number of species only by the most diverse genus Cassida LINNAEUS, 1758 (421 species). In my opinion at least part of the subgenera represent coherent morphological and biological groups and should be treated as genera. The problem needs molecular study and in my World Catalogue of the Cassidinae (BOROWIEC 1999) I treated many stolaine genera in narrow sense. -
2011 Biodiversity Snapshot. Isle of Man Appendices
UK Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies: 2011 Biodiversity snapshot. Isle of Man: Appendices. Author: Elizabeth Charter Principal Biodiversity Officer (Strategy and Advocacy). Department of Environment, Food and Agriculture, Isle of man. More information available at: www.gov.im/defa/ This section includes a series of appendices that provide additional information relating to that provided in the Isle of Man chapter of the publication: UK Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies: 2011 Biodiversity snapshot. All information relating to the Isle or Man is available at http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-5819 The entire publication is available for download at http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-5821 1 Table of Contents Appendix 1: Multilateral Environmental Agreements ..................................................................... 3 Appendix 2 National Wildife Legislation ......................................................................................... 5 Appendix 3: Protected Areas .......................................................................................................... 6 Appendix 4: Institutional Arrangements ........................................................................................ 10 Appendix 5: Research priorities .................................................................................................... 13 Appendix 6 Ecosystem/habitats ................................................................................................... 14 Appendix 7: Species .................................................................................................................... -
Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cassidinae) from Brazil
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGYENTOMOLOGY ISSN (online): 1802-8829 Eur. J. Entomol. 113: 352–363, 2016 http://www.eje.cz doi: 10.14411/eje.2016.046 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Comparative cytogenetic analysis in 13 tortoise beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cassidinae) from Brazil AMÁLIA T. LOPES 1, FLÁVIA R. FERNANDES 2 and MARIELLE C. SCHNEIDER 3 1 Universidade Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Departamento de Biologia, Avenida 24A, 1515, Bela Vista, 13506-900, Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brasil; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, MPEG, Departamento de Entomologia, Avenida Perimetral, 1901, Terra Firme, 66077-830, Belém, Pará, Brasil; e-mail: fl [email protected] 3 Universidade Federal de São Paulo, UNIFESP, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Avenida Professor Artur Riedel, 275, 09972-270, Diadema, São Paulo, Brasil; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, C-band, chromosome, karyotype, meiosis, sex chromosome system, constitutive heterochromatin Abstract. In the present work, we have characterized the chromosomes of 13 Cassidinae beetles, belonging to four tribes, the broad aim being to increase the cytogenetic data and establish the mechanisms involved in chromosome evolution of this sub- family, which appear to be conserved karyotypically, i.e. 2n = 16 + Xyp. The analysis of mitotic and meiotic cells revealed a high diversity of diploid numbers (2n = 18, 2n = 22, 2n = 26, 2n = 32, 2n = 36, 2n = 40, 2n = 42), and the presence of sex chromosome system of the Xyp type in most species, with the exception of two representatives that exhibited Xyr and XY systems. C-banding showed constitutive heterochromatin predominantly localized in the pericentromeric region of the chromosomes, but differences regarding the number of chromosomes with positive C-bands, intensity of the blocks, and presence of additional bands in auto- somes and/or sex chromosomes were observed among the species investigated. -
Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) from the Prahova and the Doftana Valleys, Romania
Muzeul Olteniei Craiova. Oltenia. Studii i comunicri. tiinele Naturii, Tom. XXV/2009 ISSN 1454-6914 FAUNISTIC DATA ON LEAF BEETLES (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE) FROM THE PRAHOVA AND THE DOFTANA VALLEYS, ROMANIA SANDA MAICAN Abstract. This paper presents data regarding the occurrence of leaf-beetles species in some forests phytocoenosis and shrub lands situated on the middle courses of the Prahova and the Doftana rivers, on the basis of the material collected between 2007 and 2008. Until now there were recorded in the researched sites 41 chrysomelid species, belonging to 24 genera and 7 subfamilies: Criocerinae (one species), Clythrinae (4 species), Cryptocephalinae (9 species), Chrysomelinae (15 species), Galerucinae (one species), Alticinae (9 species) and Cassidinae (2 species). In addition, for every species cited in the taxa list, information about the present distribution range and the biology of these species are mentioned. All the identified leaf beetle species are mentioned for the first time in the investigated areas. Keywords: Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, the Prahova, the Doftana, Romania. Rezumat. Date faunistice asupra crisomelidelor (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) de pe Vile Prahovei i Doftanei, România. Lucrarea prezint date referitoare la prezena crisomelidelor în câteva fitocenoze lemnoase i de tufriuri situate pe cursurile mijlocii ale râurilor Prahova i Doftana, pe baza unui material colectat în perioada 2007-2008. Pân în prezent, în siturile cercetate au fost identificate 41 specii, încadrate în 24 genuri i 7 subfamilii: Criocerinae (1 specie), Clythrinae (4 specii), Cryptocephalinae (9 specii), Chrysomelinae (15 specii), Galerucinae (1 specie), Alticinae (9 specii) i Cassidinae (2 specii). Pentru fiecare specie citat în lista taxonomic, sunt prezentate informaii referitoare la arealul actual de rspândire i la biologia acestor specii. -
Biomass Power Project Invertebrates Scoping Level
Biomass Power Project Invertebrates Scoping level John Irish 21 June 2017 Biodata Consultancy cc P.O. Box 30061, Windhoek, Namibia [email protected] 2 Table of Contents 1 Introduction........................................................................................................................3 2 Approach to study..............................................................................................................3 2.1 Terms of reference..........................................................................................................3 2.2 Methodology...................................................................................................................3 2.2.1 Literature survey..........................................................................................................3 2.2.2 Site visits......................................................................................................................5 3 Limitations and Assumptions.............................................................................................5 4 Legislative context..............................................................................................................6 4.1 Applicable laws and policies...........................................................................................6 5 Results...............................................................................................................................7 5.1 Raw diversity...................................................................................................................7