Andrews Mill Company Plant

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Andrews Mill Company Plant NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: Andrews Mill Company Plant Other names/site number: Uxbridge Worsted Company, Tupper Corporation Office Name of related multiple property listing: N/A (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: 761 Great Road City or town: North Smithfield State: RI County: Providence Not For Publication: Vicinity: ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this x nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property x meets ___ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: ___ national ___ statewide _x_ local Applicable National Register Criteria: _x_ A _ _ B _x_ C _ _ D Signature of certifying official/Title: Date Rhode Island Historical Preservation & Heritage Commission State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. Signature of commenting official: Date Title : State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government 1 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Andrews Mill Company Plant Providence, Rhode Island Name of Property County and State ______________________________________________________________________________ 4. National Park Service Certification I hereby certify that this property is: entered in the National Register determined eligible for the National Register determined not eligible for the National Register removed from the National Register other (explain:) _____________________ ______________________________________________________________________ Signature of the Keeper Date of Action ____________________________________________________________________________ 5. Classification Ownership of Property (Check as many boxes as apply.) Private: X Public – Local Public – State Public – Federal Category of Property (Check only one box.) Building(s) X District Site Structure Object Sections 4-6 page 2 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Andrews Mill Company Plant Providence, Rhode Island Name of Property County and State Number of Resources within Property (Do not include previously listed resources in the count) Contributing Noncontributing 3 3 buildings sites 3 4 structures objects 6 7 Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register 0 ____________________________________________________________________________ 6. Function or Use Historic Functions (Enter categories from instructions.) INDUSTRY: manufacturing facility Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions.) VACANT/NOT IN USE Sections 4-6 page 3 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Andrews Mill Company Plant Providence, Rhode Island Name of Property County and State _____________________________________________________________________________ 7. Description Architectural Classification (Enter categories from instructions.) OTHER: Early 20th-century Industrial Materials: (enter categories from instructions.) Principal exterior materials of the property: BRICK, WOOD, CONCRETE, SYNTHETICS Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current physical appearance and condition of the property. Describe contributing and noncontributing resources if applicable. Begin with a summary paragraph that briefly describes the general characteristics of the property, such as its location, type, style, method of construction, setting, size, and significant features. Indicate whether the property has historic integrity.) ______________________________________________________________________________ Summary Paragraph Sited along the Branch River on a 32-acre parcel in North Smithfield, Rhode Island, the Andrews Mill Company Plant comprises three contributing buildings and three contributing structures related to the period of active occupation of the Andrews Mill Company (1918-1925), a textile manufacturer. Contributing buildings include a Main Mill (1918 et seq.), attached Boiler House (1919), and a freestanding Machine Shop/Gate House (1919) at the river’s edge. Contributing structures include a concrete headrace gate (1918, 1919) at the location of a former mill trench (part of the Andrews Mill waterpower system), a steel water tower (1919), and a stone masonry pump house (1919). The Andrews Mill Company Plant was built by the C.I. Bigney Construction Company. From 1936 to 1954, the Andrews Mill Company Plant was occupied by the Uxbridge Worsted Company; early in its tenure that firm built a wood-frame pump house, and around 1950 a small brick incinerator was constructed. Both are considered non-contributing since they were built after the period of significance. The Main Mill was expanded in the 1960s and 1970s, while the property was owned by the Tupper Corporation (1955-1994), through the construction of a north (rear) extension, an addition on the west elevation, an enclosed loading dock at the northeast corner, and an addition supporting two cooling towers at the northwest corner. The additions, all Section 7 page 4 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Andrews Mill Company Plant Providence, Rhode Island Name of Property County and State built after the period of significance, are considered non-contributing. The Tupper Corporation also built a two-story office building (1979) and two small, freestanding wastewater treatment buildings (ca. 1975), all of which are non-contributing. Two masonry walls, which pre-date the development of the Andrews Mill Company Plant, are also non-contributing. ___________________________________________________________________________ Narrative Description Contributing Buildings Building 1 Main Mill (1918 et seq.) The Main Mill at the Andrews Mill Company Plant is a single-story (plus partial basement), south-facing,1 brick weave shed with a concrete foundation and a sawtooth roof over all but the two southernmost bays (see Figure 1). It was built for the weaving and finishing of worsted cloth. Because of the site’s sloping topography, two full floors of the Main Mill are visible on the west elevation while on the south, north and east elevations only one floor is above-grade. As built in 1918, the building measured 146’ across the facade by 215’ to the rear. Granite trim throughout is molded, quarry-faced, or plain. Floors are concrete with interior columns of round- section timber in the original block. Later additions and alterations to this plan are described below. Built to employ both electrical and hydraulic power, the Andrews Mill utilized a power trench (filled in the 1940s) that drew water from above the nearby dam and returned it to the natural flow of the river about 200’ downstream.2 Typical of New England weave sheds, the orientation of the building is such that the glazed slope of the sawtooth roof faces north to direct diffused sunlight into the weave room below. The 14 sawtooth structures combine timber elements with steel I-beams. The entire sawtooth structure is now membrane-covered. The building’s principal entrance is located in the center of the south façade, while industrial access, for shipping and operatives, was in the mill yard along the east elevation. Window openings are a combination of segmental-arch and rectangular; round windows are located in the sawtooth peaks. A concrete trench in the basement appears to be related to textile finishing operations, which are documented to have been carried out on site; the basement is the only likely place for finishing to have taken place. South (principal) elevation: The south elevation of the Andrews Mill Company Main Mill is nineteen bays wide, with an entrance located in the center bay. In the mid-1960s then-owner 1 The building does not face directly south but, rather, slightly toward the southwest. For ease of description, however, the primary façade will be described as facing south. 2 This trench directed water to the Machine Shop/Gate House (Building 3), which housed a hydroelectric installation until ca. 1935. Spent water
Recommended publications
  • Blackstone River Vall Ey
    Blackstone River Vall ey SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY STUDY REPORT 2011 223-905_5-18.pdf 1 5/18/11 2:29 PM This report has been prepared to provide United States Congress and the public with information about the resources in the study area and how they relate to criteria for feasibility of a National Heritage Area. Publication and transmittal of this report should not be considered an endorsement or a commitment by the National Park Service to seek or to support either specifi c legislative authorization for the project or appropriation for its implementation. Authorization and funding for any new commitments by the National Park Service will have to be considered in light of competing priorities for existing units of the National Park System and other programs. This report was prepared by the United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Northeast Region. For additional copies or more information contact: National Park Service Northeast Region / Boston Offi ce Park Planning and Special Studies 15 State Street Boston, Massachusetts 02109 617.223.5048 223-905_5-18.pdf 2 5/18/11 2:29 PM Blackstone River Valley Special Resource Study, 2011 UPDATED ERRATA On pp. 99 Under “Commissioners,” the following names should appear among the members: Kenneth Bianchi Blackstone, MA Louise Redding Uxbridge, MA May 29, 2012 update: On pp. 82 Under “Cost Estimates,” a clerical error was detected regarding the $3,500,000 figure for Annual Costs. The correct figure is: $ 2,600,000. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 CHAPTER ONE: STUDY PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND Project Overview . 13 Special Resource Study Process .
    [Show full text]
  • Elisha Bartlett Family Papers
    Elisha Bartlett family papers This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on September 28, 2021. English Describing Archives: A Content Standard Rare Books, Special Collections, and Preservation, River Campus Libraries, University of Rochester Rush Rhees Library Second Floor, Room 225 Rochester, NY 14627-0055 [email protected] URL: https://www.library.rochester.edu/spaces/rbscp Elisha Bartlett family papers Table of Contents Summary Information .................................................................................................................................... 3 Biographical/Historical note .......................................................................................................................... 3 Scope and Contents note ............................................................................................................................... 4 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................ 6 Related Materials ........................................................................................................................................... 6 Controlled Access Headings .......................................................................................................................... 7 Collection Inventory ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Series I: Correspondence ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • North Smithfield.Pdf
    t’ - t - - k IWlUI 4 a. I Rhode Island Historical Preservation Commission STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS PRELIMINARY SURVEY REPORT TOWN OF NORTH SMITHFIELD SEPTEMBER, 1980 RHODE ISLAND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMISSION 150 BENEFIT STREET, PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND 02903 PREFACE The Rhode Island Historical Preservation Commission, established by the General Assembly in 1968, is charged with the responsibility of saf e- guarding Rhode Island’s cultural heritage. In order to provide an over view of the physical record of this heritage, the Commission has initiated a "broadbrush" or preliminary planning survey of the rural and suburban towns of the state. The purpose of this initial inventory is to identify and record properties of historic and architectural significance in each town. Presently, archeological resources are treated through a separate survey effort being conducted by the Commission. The preliminary surveys are designed to. provide a catalog of nonrenewable cultural resources This information is needed for a variety of planning purposes at the local, state, and national levels. It identifies sites, districts, and structures eligible for nomination to the National Register of Historic Places,and it becomes a basis for preservation planning. The preliminary surveys are accomplished by driving all public rights- ofrway in a given town and noting on United States Geological Survey maps enlarged to twice normal scale or other maps that nay be more appropriate each building or site of particular architectural, visual, cultural, or historic significance. Each property is photographed and recorded on a standard data sheet which includes a physical description and notations concerning history, use, condition, and architectural style or period.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Journal
    RHODE ISLAND M EDICAL J OURNAL FUNDING FOR VULNERABLE VETS PROGRAM AT VAMC PAGE 51 THE FIRST GRADUATES OF Brown’s firsT MEDICAL SCHOOL, HERITAGE PAGE 66 BROWN TO HONOR DR. THOMAS C. CATENA, SURGEON IN SUDAN, AT COMMENCEMENT PAGE 57 DIANE LIPSCOMBE, PhD, NAMED DIRECTOR OF BROWN INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN SCIENCE PAGE 62 MAY 2016 VOLUME 99 • NUMBER 5 ISSN 2327-2228 Your records are secure. Until they’re not. Data theft can happen to anyone, anytime. A misplaced mobile device can compromise your personal or patient records. RIMS-IBC can get you the cyber liability insurance you need to protect yourself and your patients. Call us. 401-272-1050 IN COOPERATION WITH RIMS-IBC 405 PROMENADE STREET, SUITE B, PROVIDENCE RI 02908-4811 MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL/CYBER LIABILITY PROPERTY/CASUALTY LIFE/HEALTH/DISABILITY RHODE ISLAND M EDICAL J OURNAL 7 COMMENTARY No stone unturned JOSEPH H. FRIEDMAN, MD Downton Abbey’s ‘Medical’ Finale HERBERT RAKATANSKY, MD 13 RIMJ AROUND THE WORLD Panama Canal 40 RIMS NEWS Working for You Mix & Mingle Why You Should Join RIMS 65 HERITAGE The graduates of the first medical school at Brown: 1811–1826 MARY KORR RHODE ISLAND M EDICAL J OURNAL IN THE NEWS LIFESPAN, SEVERAL RI PHYSICIAN GROUPS 46 50 WOMEN & INFANTS/BROWN form independent physician association participate in NIH’s Research Networks BRADLEY HOSPITAL 47 51 PROVIDENCE VA MEDICAL CENTER launches new outpatient program Long-Term Services Research for high-risk adolescents for Vulnerable Vets gets funding RI HOSPITAL 47 51 RI DEPT. OF HEALTH study finds more deaths in US confirms
    [Show full text]
  • Murdock Genealogy Robert Murdock of Roxbury, Massachusetts
    MURDOCK GENEALOGY ROBERT MURDOCK OF ROXBURY, MASSACHUSETTS AND SOME OF HIS DESCENDANTS WITH NOTES ON THE DESCENDANTS OF JOHN MURDO of Plymouth, Massachusetts GEORGE MURDOCK of Plainfield, Connecticut PETER MURDOCK of Saybrook, Connecticut WILLIAM MURDOCH of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania AND OTHERS COMPILED BY JOSEPH B. MURDOCK United Staks Naey, Retired Member of the Ne-JJ England Historic Genealogical Society and of Tlie Ne-JJ Hampshire HistoriaJl Society BOSTON C. E. GOODSPEED & CO. 1925 CONTENTS PAGE A1Dls OF l\rtrnDOCH OF Ct7=0DE."i Frontispiece Tm: l\IUJU>ocx: F A.'-IILY 5 ROBERT Mtra!>OCK OF ROXBURY 14 Joa:. MURDOCK OF PLntOUTB: • 179 PETER :MURDOCK OF SAYBROOK. 204 WILLI..Ut MtmDOCH OF PHILADELPHIA 215 GEORGE MtraDOCK OF PLAD."FIELD 219 MtraDOCK L'.-oEXES 245,265 b-oEXES OF Orm:a N.un:s 257, 271 THE MURDOCK FAMILY Members of the :Murdock family do not make their appearance on our colonial records until late in the seventeenth century. The family is unquestionably of Scotch origin, but the name is not un­ common in the northern pnrt of England, and appears frequently in Ireland, especially in IBster. There was but little emigration to America from these sections in the early years of the seventeenth century, New England and Vn-ginia being settled from the south and east of England. The first Scotch settlement of any importance was probably that of the prisoners ~ptured at the battle of Dunbar by Cromwell in 1650. Many of these unquestionably left descend­ ants, but they are not mentioned as such in the records. Later on in the century an emigration took place from southwestern Scotland to IBster and to America, to escape from the persistent persecution of the inhabitants of that section by the Church of England, and later by the Roman Catholic administration of James the Second.
    [Show full text]
  • The Early Career of Pliny Earle: a Founder of American Psychiatry
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 1971 The early career of Pliny Earle: A founder of American Psychiatry Constance M. Mcgovern University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Mcgovern, Constance M., "The early career of Pliny Earle: A founder of American Psychiatry" (1971). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 1784. https://doi.org/10.7275/sbmg-m013 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Early Career of Pliny Earle: a Founder of American Psychiatry i A Thesis Presented By Constance M. McGovern Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts in rtial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree JViAiiTiiiK OF AKTb May, 1971 Major Subject American Social History PR£FACii Dr. Pliny Earle {ie09-l?^92) is a major figure in the history of American psychiatry. Though he is worthy of a full-dress doctoral dissertation, this master's thesis deals only with the first part of his life. To introduce a raan as a subject for a career biography and then to fail to treat the most significant years of his career is a seemin^r contradiction. Dr. Pliny Earle, however, was an unusual man. Not until he was fifty-four years old did he begin his ascendancy in the American psychiatric field. To do justice to the following twenty-two years he spent effi- ciently administering Northampton State Hospital, attacking the "Cult of Curability," and establishing standards for the treatment of the mentally ill would necessitate neglect of the forces which shaped the success of these later years.
    [Show full text]