DOCSLIB.ORG

Sarahsaurus Aurifontanalis from the Early Jurassic Kayenta Formation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sarahsaurus Aurifontanalis from the Early Jurassic Kayenta Formation RESEARCH ARTICLE Anatomy and systematics of the sauropodomorph Sarahsaurus aurifontanalis from the Early Jurassic Kayenta Formation 1,2 1 Adam D. MarshID *, Timothy B. Rowe 1 The Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America, 2 Division of Science and Resource Management, Petrified Forest National Park, Arizona, United States of America * [email protected] a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract a1111111111 a1111111111 Sarahsaurus aurifontanalis, from the Kayenta Formation of Arizona, is one of only three sauropodomorph dinosaurs known from the Early Jurassic of North America. It joins Anchi- saurus polyzelus, from the older Portland Formation of the Hartford Basin, and Seitaad reussi, from the younger Navajo Sandstone of Utah, in representing the oldest North Ameri- OPEN ACCESS can sauropodomorphs. If it is true that sauropodomorphs were absent from North America Citation: Marsh AD, Rowe TB (2018) Anatomy and during the Late Triassic, the relationship among these three dinosaurs offers a test of the systematics of the sauropodomorph Sarahsaurus mechanisms that drove recovery in North American biodiversity following the end-Triassic aurifontanalis from the Early Jurassic Kayenta extinction event. Here we provide the first thorough description of Sarahsaurus aurifontana- Formation. PLoS ONE 13(10): e0204007. https:// doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204007 lis based on completed preparation and computed tomographic imaging of the holotype and referred specimens. With new anatomical data, our phylogenetic analysis supports the con- Editor: William Oki Wong, Indiana University Bloomington, UNITED STATES clusion that Sarahsaurus aurifontanalis is nested within the primarily Gondwanan clade Massospondylidae, while agreeing with previous analyses that the three North American Received: December 4, 2017 sauropodomorphs do not themselves form an exclusive clade. A revised diagnosis and Accepted: September 1, 2018 more thorough understanding of the anatomy of Sarahsaurus aurifontanalis support the Published: October 10, 2018 view that independent dispersal events were at least partly responsible for the recovery in Copyright: This is an open access article, free of all North American vertebrate diversity following a major extinction event. copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. Data Availability Statement: Locality information Introduction and the fossils of TMM 43646-2 are available at the Univeristy of Texas Vertebrate Paleontology Lab in In the late 19th Century O. C. Marsh of the Yale Peabody Museum described the first remains Austin, TX (Accession number: A2000.43646). of North American early sauropodomorph dinosaurs, from the Early Jurassic Portland Forma- Linear measurements and phylogenetic character- tion of Massachusetts and Connecticut [1±6]. Several names were coined for these specimens, taxon matrices for all analyses in the paper are but most recent authors consider all this material to represent a single taxon, and most (but included as supplemental information. Digital not all) recognize ( ) as its valid name [7±10]. We follow videos of CT renderings and the CT data Anchisaurus Ammosaurus polyzelus themselves are available at The University of Texas this convention below. High-Resolution X-Ray Computed Tomography Several decades would pass before additional early sauropodomorph specimens were found Facility (www.ctlab.geo.utexas.edu). in North America, and nearly a century before informative new specimens were recovered. PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204007 October 10, 2018 1 / 108 Anatomy and systematics of Sarahsaurus aurifontanalis Funding: This research was funded by the Jackson The next sauropodmorph to be described was a fragmentary postcranial skeleton collected by School of Geosciences and the National Science Lionel F. Brady of the Museum of Northern Arizona. It was found in northern Arizona in the Foundation (NSF EAR 1258878, EAR 1561622, uppermost formation of the Glen Canyon Group, the Early Jurassic Navajo Sandstone. Brady EAR 1160721, EAR 0948842, and IIS-0531767) to TBR. Andrew Milner and the St. George Dinosaur referred this material to Anchisaurus (Ammosaurus)[11, 12], believing this taxon to be a thero- Discovery Site at Johnson Farm funded Brian pod dinosaur. Galton [7, 13] later correctly interpreted Anchisaurus (Ammosaurus) as an early Engh's art of the Kayenta fauna. The funders had sauropodomorph, to which he referred Brady's material plus a second fragmentary specimen no role in study design, data collection and from the Navajo Sandstone of Arizona that was collected by Charles L. Camp for the Univer- analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the sity of California Museum of Paleontology. Yates [8] subsequently argued that the two Navajo manuscript. Sandstone specimens represented a single taxon and that it was distinct from Anchisaurus Competing interests: The authors have declared (Ammosaurus). He thought it was possibly related to Massospondylus carinatus [14] from that no competing interests exist. southern Africa, but he deemed the material too incomplete for a definitive referral. Abbreviations: BP, Evolutionary Studies Institute Between 1976 and 1978, a joint expedition from the Museum of Northern Arizona and (formerly the Bernard Price Institiute for Harvard's Museum of Comparative Zoology (MCZ) explored another part of the Glen Canyon Paleontological Research), Johannesburg, South Group in northern Arizona, the so-called `Silty Facies' of the Early Jurassic Kayenta Formation, Africa; BSP, Bayerische Staatssammlung fuÈr which underlies and interfingers with the Navajo Sandstone. They collected a single broken PalaÈontologie und Historische Geologie, MuÈnchen, Germany; LV, Lufeng Dinosaur Museum, Jingshan, sauropodomorph skull and associated postcranial fragments from the base of a geographic fea- Yunnan Province, China; MCP, Museu de Ciêncian ture known as `Rock Head.' Owing to the questionable taxonomic identity (below), we infor- e Tecnologia PUCS, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MCZ, maly designate this as the `Rock Head specimen.' The specimen was reposited in the MCZ Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard (MCZ 8893). University, Cambridge, Massachusetts; SMNS, In the initial description [15], the Rock Head specimen was referred to sp., Staatliches Museum fuÈr Naturkunde, Stuttgart, Massospondylus Germany; TMM, Vertebrate Paleontology a well-known taxon represented by numerous relatively complete skeletons from multiple Laboratory, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, localities in southern Africa [14]. Its identification as Massospondylus sp. was taken as evidence Texas. further supporting the concept that a cosmopolitan dinosaur fauna of low taxonomic diversity occupied Pangaea in the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic [9, 10, 16±18]. Subsequent workers expressed doubts about its referral to Massospondylus sp., and it became known as `the unnamed Kayenta prosauropod' (e.g., [19] p. 27, [20]). Uncertainty about its identity also raised some of the first doubts to be cast over the prevailing view of cosmopolitan dinosaur faunas of low taxonomic diversity across Pangaea in the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic. In 2006, the sauropodomorph ªFendusaurus eldoniº from the Early Jurassic McCoy Brook Formation of Nova Scotia was named on a very poorly preserved specimen and given prelimi- nary description in an unpublished dissertation [21]. A formal description and diagnosis has yet to be published. In 2010, preliminary descriptions of two new early sauropodomorphs from the Glen Can- yon Group of the Colorado Plateau were published. The first was Seitaad ruessi, described by Sertich and Loewen [22] based on a single, partial skeleton lacking the skull. It was the third sauropodomorph specimen reported from the Navajo Sandstone; it was collected in southern Utah by the Utah Museum of Natural History [22, 23]. Seitaad ruessi was postulated to have affinities either to plateosaurid or to massospondylid sauropodomorphs, but its incomplete- ness left a measure of phylogenetic uncertainty that was compounded by more general uncer- tainty and poor phylogenetic resolution for this early history of the sauropodomorph lineage [24, 25]. The two specimens previously reported from the Navajo Sandstone were found to compare favorably to Seitaad ruessi, but they were considered too fragmentary for a confident referral [22]. Next to be described was Sarahsaurus aurifontanalis, based on two partial skeletons [25]. Both individuals were collected from a single quarry in the Silty Facies of the Kayenta Forma- tion during a collaborative survey by The University of Texas Vertebrate Paleontology Labora- tory and the Navajo Nation EcoScouts that took place between 1997±2000. In the initial diagnosis and description of Sarahsaurus aurifontanalis, the holotype was designated as the more mature and complete of the two skeletons and the only one that included parts of a PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204007 October 10, 2018 2 / 108 Anatomy and systematics of Sarahsaurus aurifontanalis disarticuated skull; the less-mature and less-complete skeleton was designated the paratype [25]. In this initial description, the Rock Head skull was provisionally referred to Sarahsaurus aurifontanalis. Below, we present a more detailed description of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fused and Vaulted Nasals of Tyrannosaurid Dinosaurs: Implications for Cranial Strength and Feeding Mechanics
    Fused and vaulted nasals of tyrannosaurid dinosaurs: Implications for cranial strength and feeding mechanics ERIC SNIVELY, DONALD M. HENDERSON, and DOUG S. PHILLIPS Snively, E., Henderson, D.M., and Phillips, D.S. 2006. Fused and vaulted nasals of tyrannosaurid dinosaurs: Implications for cranial strength and feeding mechanics. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 51 (3): 435–454. Tyrannosaurid theropods display several unusual adaptations of the skulls and teeth. Their nasals are fused and vaulted, suggesting that these elements braced the cranium against high feeding forces. Exceptionally high strengths of maxillary teeth in Tyrannosaurus rex indicate that it could exert relatively greater feeding forces than other tyrannosaurids. Areas and second moments of area of the nasals, calculated from CT cross−sections, show higher nasal strengths for large tyrannosaurids than for Allosaurus fragilis. Cross−sectional geometry of theropod crania reveals high second moments of area in tyrannosaurids, with resulting high strengths in bending and torsion, when compared with the crania of similarly sized theropods. In tyrannosaurids trends of strength increase are positively allomeric and have similar allometric expo− nents, indicating correlated progression towards unusually high strengths of the feeding apparatus. Fused, arched nasals and broad crania of tyrannosaurids are consistent with deep bites that impacted bone and powerful lateral movements of the head for dismembering prey. Key words: Theropoda, Carnosauria, Tyrannosauridae, biomechanics, feeding mechanics, computer modeling, com− puted tomography. Eric Snively [[email protected]], Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada; Donald M. Henderson [[email protected]], Royal Tyrrell Museum of Palaeontology, Box 7500, Drumheller, Alberta T0J 0Y0, Canada; Doug S.
    [Show full text]
  • CPY Document
    v^ Official Journal of the Biology Unit of the American Topical Association 10 Vol. 40(4) DINOSAURS ON STAMPS by Michael K. Brett-Surman Ph.D. Dinosaurs are the most popular animals of all time, and the most misunderstood. Dinosaurs did not fly in the air and did not live in the oceans, nor on lake bottoms. Not all large "prehistoric monsters" are dinosaurs. The most famous NON-dinosaurs are plesiosaurs, moso- saurs, pelycosaurs, pterodactyls and ichthyosaurs. Any name ending in 'saurus' is not automatically a dinosaur, for' example, Mastodonto- saurus is neither a mastodon nor a dinosaur - it is an amphibian! Dinosaurs are defined by a combination of skeletal features that cannot readily be seen when the animal is fully restored in a flesh reconstruction. Because of the confusion, this compilation is offered as a checklist for the collector. This topical list compiles all the dinosaurs on stamps where the actual bones are pictured or whole restorations are used. It excludes footprints (as used in the Lesotho stamps), cartoons (as in the 1984 issue from Gambia), silhouettes (Ascension Island # 305) and unoffi- cial issues such as the famous Sinclair Dinosaur stamps. The name "Brontosaurus", which appears on many stamps, is used with quotation marks to denote it as a popular name in contrast to its correct scientific name, Apatosaurus. For those interested in a detailed encyclopedic work about all fossils on stamps, the reader is referred to the forthcoming book, 'Paleontology - a Guide to the Postal Materials Depicting Prehistoric Lifeforms' by Fran Adams et. al. The best book currently in print is a book titled 'Dinosaur Stamps of the World' by Baldwin & Halstead.
    [Show full text]
  • The Braincase, Brain and Palaeobiology of the Basal Sauropodomorph Dinosaur Thecodontosaurus Antiquus
    applyparastyle “fig//caption/p[1]” parastyle “FigCapt” Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2020, XX, 1–22. With 10 figures. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/advance-article/doi/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa157/6032720 by University of Bristol Library user on 14 December 2020 The braincase, brain and palaeobiology of the basal sauropodomorph dinosaur Thecodontosaurus antiquus ANTONIO BALLELL1,*, J. LOGAN KING1, JAMES M. NEENAN2, EMILY J. RAYFIELD1 and MICHAEL J. BENTON1 1School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK 2Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PW, UK Received 27 May 2020; revised 15 October 2020; accepted for publication 26 October 2020 Sauropodomorph dinosaurs underwent drastic changes in their anatomy and ecology throughout their evolution. The Late Triassic Thecodontosaurus antiquus occupies a basal position within Sauropodomorpha, being a key taxon for documenting how those morphofunctional transitions occurred. Here, we redescribe the braincase osteology and reconstruct the neuroanatomy of Thecodontosaurus, based on computed tomography data. The braincase of Thecodontosaurus shares the presence of medial basioccipital components of the basal tubera and a U-shaped basioccipital–parabasisphenoid suture with other basal sauropodomorphs and shows a distinct combination of characters: a straight outline of the braincase floor, an undivided metotic foramen, an unossified gap, large floccular fossae, basipterygoid processes perpendicular to the cultriform process in lateral view and a rhomboid foramen magnum. We reinterpret these braincase features in the light of new discoveries in dinosaur anatomy. Our endocranial reconstruction reveals important aspects of the palaeobiology of Thecodontosaurus, supporting a bipedal stance and cursorial habits, with adaptations to retain a steady head and gaze while moving.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin of Comb Ridge
    THE ZEPHYR/ JUNE-JULY 2011 THE ORIGIN OF COMB RIDGE Robert Fillmore, Western State College of Colorado in Gunnison, CO (An excerpt and images from his new book: Geological Evolution of the Colorado Plateau) Comb Ridge is a lofty sinuous spine of red sandstone that stretch- ramp of Comb Ridge. Another notable result of this uplift is the es over 80 miles across northern Arizona and southeast Utah. This ensuing deep incision into the uplift by energized rivers as their monocline, as these structures are called, begins near Kayenta and runoff seeks a path to lower elevations. The deep narrow canyons snakes northward to fade away near the west flank of the Abajo of Cedar Mesa owe their existence to Monument Upwarp. Mountains. Monoclines are a peculiar component of the Colorado Plateau, with their long ridges of steeply tilted strata in a region otherwise known for its miles of flat-lying sedimentary rocks. They Monoclines are a peculiar component are hard to miss. Although not confined to the Colorado Plateau, of the Colorado Plateau, with their long ridges their concentration here is unique. Similar structures make up the of steeply tilted strata in a region San Rafael Swell, Capitol reef, and Colorado National monument otherwise known for its miles of near Grand Junction. All are closely related in origin and timing. flat-lying sedimentary rocks. They are hard to miss. The term monocline refers to a single-limbed fold; in simple geometric terms, a gargantuan ramp. The ramp of steeply tilted strata separates uplifted regions from those that have dropped The monoclines formed at the same time as the jagged Rocky downwards, relatively speaking.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Article
    A couple of partially-feathered creatures about the The Outside Story size of a turkey pop out of a stand of ferns. By the water you spot a flock of bigger animals, lean and predatory, catching fish. And then an even bigger pair of animals, each longer than a car, with ostentatious crests on their heads, stalk out of the heat haze. The fish-catchers dart aside, but the new pair have just come to drink. We can only speculate what a walk through Jurassic New England would be like, but the fossil record leaves many hints. According to Matthew Inabinett, one of the Beneski Museum of Natural History’s senior docents and a student of vertebrate paleontology, dinosaur footprints found in the sedimentary rock of the Connecticut Valley reveal much about these animals and their environment. At the time, the land that we know as New England was further south, close to where Cuba is now. A system of rift basins that cradled lakes ran right through our region, from North Carolina to Nova Scotia. As reliable sources of water, with plants for the herbivores and fish for the carnivores, the lakes would have been havens of life. While most of the fossil footprints found in New England so far are in the lower Connecticut Valley, Dinosaur Tracks they provide a window into a world that extended throughout the region. According to Inabinett, the By: Rachel Marie Sargent tracks generally fall into four groupings. He explained that these names are for the tracks, not Imagine taking a walk through a part of New the dinosaurs that made them, since, “it’s very England you’ve never seen—how it was 190 million difficult, if not impossible, to match a footprint to a years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin and Early Evolution of Dinosaurs
    Biol. Rev. (2010), 85, pp. 55–110. 55 doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00094.x The origin and early evolution of dinosaurs Max C. Langer1∗,MartinD.Ezcurra2, Jonathas S. Bittencourt1 and Fernando E. Novas2,3 1Departamento de Biologia, FFCLRP, Universidade de S˜ao Paulo; Av. Bandeirantes 3900, Ribeir˜ao Preto-SP, Brazil 2Laboratorio de Anatomia Comparada y Evoluci´on de los Vertebrados, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales ‘‘Bernardino Rivadavia’’, Avda. Angel Gallardo 470, Cdad. de Buenos Aires, Argentina 3CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cient´ıficas y T´ecnicas); Avda. Rivadavia 1917 - Cdad. de Buenos Aires, Argentina (Received 28 November 2008; revised 09 July 2009; accepted 14 July 2009) ABSTRACT The oldest unequivocal records of Dinosauria were unearthed from Late Triassic rocks (approximately 230 Ma) accumulated over extensional rift basins in southwestern Pangea. The better known of these are Herrerasaurus ischigualastensis, Pisanosaurus mertii, Eoraptor lunensis,andPanphagia protos from the Ischigualasto Formation, Argentina, and Staurikosaurus pricei and Saturnalia tupiniquim from the Santa Maria Formation, Brazil. No uncontroversial dinosaur body fossils are known from older strata, but the Middle Triassic origin of the lineage may be inferred from both the footprint record and its sister-group relation to Ladinian basal dinosauromorphs. These include the typical Marasuchus lilloensis, more basal forms such as Lagerpeton and Dromomeron, as well as silesaurids: a possibly monophyletic group composed of Mid-Late Triassic forms that may represent immediate sister taxa to dinosaurs. The first phylogenetic definition to fit the current understanding of Dinosauria as a node-based taxon solely composed of mutually exclusive Saurischia and Ornithischia was given as ‘‘all descendants of the most recent common ancestor of birds and Triceratops’’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sauropodomorph Biostratigraphy of the Elliot Formation of Southern Africa: Tracking the Evolution of Sauropodomorpha Across the Triassic–Jurassic Boundary
    Editors' choice The sauropodomorph biostratigraphy of the Elliot Formation of southern Africa: Tracking the evolution of Sauropodomorpha across the Triassic–Jurassic boundary BLAIR W. MCPHEE, EMESE M. BORDY, LARA SCISCIO, and JONAH N. CHOINIERE McPhee, B.W., Bordy, E.M., Sciscio, L., and Choiniere, J.N. 2017. The sauropodomorph biostratigraphy of the Elliot Formation of southern Africa: Tracking the evolution of Sauropodomorpha across the Triassic–Jurassic boundary. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 62 (3): 441–465. The latest Triassic is notable for coinciding with the dramatic decline of many previously dominant groups, followed by the rapid radiation of Dinosauria in the Early Jurassic. Among the most common terrestrial vertebrates from this time, sauropodomorph dinosaurs provide an important insight into the changing dynamics of the biota across the Triassic–Jurassic boundary. The Elliot Formation of South Africa and Lesotho preserves the richest assemblage of sauropodomorphs known from this age, and is a key index assemblage for biostratigraphic correlations with other simi- larly-aged global terrestrial deposits. Past assessments of Elliot Formation biostratigraphy were hampered by an overly simplistic biozonation scheme which divided it into a lower “Euskelosaurus” Range Zone and an upper Massospondylus Range Zone. Here we revise the zonation of the Elliot Formation by: (i) synthesizing the last three decades’ worth of fossil discoveries, taxonomic revision, and lithostratigraphic investigation; and (ii) systematically reappraising the strati- graphic provenance of important fossil locations. We then use our revised stratigraphic information in conjunction with phylogenetic character data to assess morphological disparity between Late Triassic and Early Jurassic sauropodomorph taxa. Our results demonstrate that the Early Jurassic upper Elliot Formation is considerably more taxonomically and morphologically diverse than previously thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Massospondylus Carinatus Owen 1854 (Dinosauria: Sauropodomorpha) from the Lower Jurassic of South Africa: Proposed Conservation of Usage by Designation of a Neotype
    Massospondylus carinatus Owen 1854 (Dinosauria: Sauropodomorpha) from the Lower Jurassic of South Africa: Proposed conservation of usage by designation of a neotype Adam M. Yates1* & Paul M. Barrett2 1Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Research, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, WITS, 2050 Johannesburg, South Africa 2Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, U.K. Received 17 February 2010. Accepted 12 November 2010 The purpose of this article is to preserve the usage of the binomen Massospondylus carinatus by designating a neotype specimen. Massospondylus is the most abundant basal sauropodomorph dinosaur from the Early Jurassic strata of southern Africa. This taxon forms the basis for an extensive palaeobiological literature and is the eponym of Massospondylidae and the nominal taxon of a biostratigraphical unit in current usage, the ‘Massospondylus Range Zone’. The syntype series of M. carinatus (five disarticulated and broken vertebrae) was destroyed during World War II, but plaster casts and illustrations of the material survive. Nonetheless, these materials cannot act as type material for this taxon under the rules of the ICZN Code. In order to avoid nomenclatural instability, we hereby designate BP/1/4934 (a skull and largely complete postcranial skeleton) as the neotype of Massospondylus carinatus. Keywords: Dinosauria, Sauropodomorpha, Massospondylidae, Massospondylus, Massospondylus carinatus, neotype, South Africa, upper Elliot Formation, Early Jurassic. INTRODUCTION same taxon, possibly even the same individual, as at least Richard Owen described and named Massospondylus some of the syntype series of Massospondylus carinatus. carinatus (1854, p. 97) with carinatus as the type species of Their initial separation from Massospondylus carinatus the genus by monotypy.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinosaurs British Isles
    DINOSAURS of the BRITISH ISLES Dean R. Lomax & Nobumichi Tamura Foreword by Dr Paul M. Barrett (Natural History Museum, London) Skeletal reconstructions by Scott Hartman, Jaime A. Headden & Gregory S. Paul Life and scene reconstructions by Nobumichi Tamura & James McKay CONTENTS Foreword by Dr Paul M. Barrett.............................................................................10 Foreword by the authors........................................................................................11 Acknowledgements................................................................................................12 Museum and institutional abbreviations...............................................................13 Introduction: An age-old interest..........................................................................16 What is a dinosaur?................................................................................................18 The question of birds and the ‘extinction’ of the dinosaurs..................................25 The age of dinosaurs..............................................................................................30 Taxonomy: The naming of species.......................................................................34 Dinosaur classification...........................................................................................37 Saurischian dinosaurs............................................................................................39 Theropoda............................................................................................................39
    [Show full text]
  • The Fauna from the Tyrannosaurus Rex Excavation, Frenchman Formation (Late Maastrichtian), Saskatchewan
    The Fauna from the Tyrannosaurus rex Excavation, Frenchman Formation (Late Maastrichtian), Saskatchewan Tim T. Tokaryk 1 and Harold N. Bryant 2 Tokaryk, T.T. and Bryant, H.N. (2004): The fauna from the Tyrannosaurus rex excavation, Frenchman Formation (Late Maastrichtian), Saskatchewan; in Summary of Investigations 2004, Volume 1, Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Sask. Industry Resources, Misc. Rep. 2004-4.1, CD-ROM, Paper A-18, 12p. Abstract The quarry that contained the partial skeleton of the Tyrannosaurus rex, familiarly known as “Scotty,” has yielded a diverse faunal and floral assemblage. The site is located in the Frenchman River valley in southwestern Saskatchewan and dates from approximately 65 million years, at the end of the Cretaceous Period. The faunal assemblage from the quarry is reviewed and the floral assemblage is summarized. Together, these assemblages provide some insight into the biological community that lived in southwestern Saskatchewan during the latest Cretaceous. Keywords: Frenchman Formation, Maastrichtian, Late Cretaceous, southwestern Saskatchewan, Tyrannosaurus rex. 1. Introduction a) Geological Setting The Frenchman Formation, of latest Maastrichtian age, is extensively exposed in southwestern Saskatchewan (Figure 1; Fraser et al., 1935; Furnival, 1950). The lithostratigraphic units in the formation consist largely of fluvial sandstones and greenish grey to green claystones. Outcrops of the Frenchman Formation are widely distributed in the Frenchman River valley, southeast of Eastend. Chambery Coulee, on the north side of the valley, includes Royal Saskatchewan Museum (RSM) locality 72F07-0022 (precise locality data on file with the RSM), the site that contained the disarticulated skeleton of a Tyrannosaurus rex. McIver (2002) subdivided the stratigraphic sequence at this locality into “lower” and “upper” beds.
    [Show full text]
  • A Re-Evaluation of the Enigmatic Dinosauriform Caseosaurus Crosbyensis from the Late Triassic of Texas, USA and Its Implications for Early Dinosaur Evolution
    A re-evaluation of the enigmatic dinosauriform Caseosaurus crosbyensis from the Late Triassic of Texas, USA and its implications for early dinosaur evolution MATTHEW G. BARON and MEGAN E. WILLIAMS Baron, M.G. and Williams, M.E. 2018. A re-evaluation of the enigmatic dinosauriform Caseosaurus crosbyensis from the Late Triassic of Texas, USA and its implications for early dinosaur evolution. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 63 (1): 129–145. The holotype specimen of the Late Triassic dinosauriform Caseosaurus crosbyensis is redescribed and evaluated phylogenetically for the first time, providing new anatomical information and data on the earliest dinosaurs and their evolution within the dinosauromorph lineage. Historically, Caseosaurus crosbyensis has been considered to represent an early saurischian dinosaur, and often a herrerasaur. More recent work on Triassic dinosaurs has cast doubt over its supposed dinosaurian affinities and uncertainty about particular features in the holotype and only known specimen has led to the species being regarded as a dinosauriform of indeterminate position. Here, we present a new diagnosis for Caseosaurus crosbyensis and refer additional material to the taxon—a partial right ilium from Snyder Quarry. Our com- parisons and phylogenetic analyses suggest that Caseosaurus crosbyensis belongs in a clade with herrerasaurs and that this clade is the sister taxon of Dinosauria, rather than positioned within it. This result, along with other recent analyses of early dinosaurs, pulls apart what remains of the “traditional” group of dinosaurs collectively termed saurischians into a polyphyletic assemblage and implies that Dinosauria should be regarded as composed exclusively of Ornithoscelida (Ornithischia + Theropoda) and Sauropodomorpha. In addition, our analysis recovers the enigmatic European taxon Saltopus elginensis among herrerasaurs for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Description of the Sauropod Dinosaur Amanzia (“Ornithopsis
    Schwarz et al. Swiss J Geosci (2020) 113:2 https://doi.org/10.1186/s00015-020-00355-5 Swiss Journal of Geosciences ORIGINAL PAPER Open Access Re-description of the sauropod dinosaur Amanzia (“Ornithopsis/Cetiosauriscus”) greppini n. gen. and other vertebrate remains from the Kimmeridgian (Late Jurassic) Reuchenette Formation of Moutier, Switzerland Daniela Schwarz1* , Philip D. Mannion2 , Oliver Wings3 and Christian A. Meyer4 Abstract Dinosaur remains were discovered in the 1860’s in the Kimmeridgian (Late Jurassic) Reuchenette Formation of Moutier, northwestern Switzerland. In the 1920’s, these were identifed as a new species of sauropod, Ornithopsis greppini, before being reclassifed as a species of Cetiosauriscus (C. greppini), otherwise known from the type species (C. stewarti) from the late Middle Jurassic (Callovian) of the UK. The syntype of “C. greppini” consists of skeletal elements from all body regions, and at least four individuals of diferent sizes can be distinguished. Here we fully re-describe this material, and re-evaluate its taxonomy and systematic placement. The Moutier locality also yielded a theropod tooth, and fragmen- tary cranial and vertebral remains of a crocodylomorph, also re-described here. “C.” greppini is a small-sized (not more than 10 m long) non-neosauropod eusauropod. Cetiosauriscus stewarti and “C.” greppini difer from each other in: (1) size; (2) the neural spine morphology and diapophyseal laminae of the anterior caudal vertebrae; (3) the length-to-height proportion in the middle caudal vertebrae; (4) the presence or absence of ridges and crests on the middle caudal cen- tra; and (5) the shape and proportions of the coracoid, humerus, and femur.
    [Show full text]