The Impact of Europeanisation on Policy-Making in Turkey: Controversies, Uncertainties and Misfits in Broadcasting Policy (1999-2009)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Impact of Europeanisation on Policy-Making in Turkey: Controversies, Uncertainties and Misfits in Broadcasting Policy (1999-2009) ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ AVRUPA TOPLULUKLARI ARAŞTIRMA VE UYGULAMA MERKEZİ Araştırma Dizisi No: 35 THE IMPACT OF EUROPEANISATION ON POLICY-MAKING IN TURKEY: CONTROVERSIES, UNCERTAINTIES AND MISFITS IN BROADCASTING POLICY (1999-2009) Burcu SÜMER Ankara-2010 Burcu SÜMER The Impact of Europeanisation on Policy-Making in Turkey: Controversies, Uncertainties and Misfits in Broadcasting Policy (1999-2009) ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ YAYINLARI NO: 248 ISBN: 978-975-482-865-8 Ankara Üniversitesi Avrupa Toplulukları Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi, 2010 Kitaptaki görüşler yazarına aittir. Kitaptaki görüşler, ATAUM’u bağlamaz. Tüm hakları saklıdır. Yayıncı izni olmadan, kısmen de olsa fotokopi, film vb. elektronik ve mekanik yöntemlerle çoğaltılamaz. Ankara Üniversitesi Avrupa Toplulukları Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi Araştırma Dizisi Editör Prof. Dr. Çağrı ERHAN Doç.Dr.Burça KIZILIRMAK Editör Yardımcısı Uzm.Deniz SENEMOĞLU Sorumlu Yazı İşleri Müdürü Uzm.Dr.Kaya UYSAL Ankara Üniversitesi Avrupa Toplulukları Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi Araştırma Dizisi No: 35 ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ BASIMEVİ İncitaşı Sokak No: 10 06510 Beşevler / ANKARA Tel: 0 (312) 213 66 55 Basım Tarihi: 12/03/2010 II ABSTRACT The recognition of Turkey’s candidacy for European Union (EU) membership at Helsinki European Council Summit in December 1999 marked a profound shift in EU-Turkey relations, which has been difficult and turbulent for decades. Turkey started undergoing a drastic transformation after the Helsinki Summit and was successful in clinching a date from the EU in October 2004 to launch accession talks. In between these two dates the two consecutive governments issued a series of new legislations in order to comply with EU conditionality, particularly with political criteria also known as the ‘Copenhagen criteria’ and finally started membership negotiations in October 2005. As of September 2009, eleven chapters have been opened for negotiations, only one of which was closed. This study aims to investigate and analyse the impact of the EU on policy-making processes in Turkey between 1999 and 2009 by focusing on a specific policy area: broadcasting. At the simplest level, it is motivated by an academic interest in the complexity of Turkey’s ever-lasting association with Europe and seeks to explore the dynamics of the post-Helsinki candidacy process by employing various theoretical tools offered by research on Europeanisation. Thus, although it questions the whole rationale of the pre- accession process in Turkey, it looks into the domestic arena of broadcasting policy-making to explore how ‘EU accession conditionality’ is translated into domestic policy responses. It concludes that Turkey’s response to EU conditionality was not unified across different issues of broadcasting policy. Its response to ‘democratic conditionality’ was directly influenced by prevailing ideas about ‘the credibility of the EU’ as well as calculations of the ‘costs of compliance’, and its response to ‘acquis conditionality’ resulted in a regulatory chaos. Overall, this research reveals that where broadcasting policy-making is concerned, changes as a result of the EU’s impact on Turkey were limited. Rather than transformation, the outcome of this process was a minimal degree of adaptation. III ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This book is based on a PhD research that I conducted in the UK at University of Westminster between 2003 and 2007. There are so many people who contributed to this research in different ways and without their help and support I could never have reached this stage. And of course, I am solely responsible of the content of this study, including its errors and limitations. I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my supervisor Professor Steven Barnett; my examiners Prof.Dr.Peter HUMPHREYS and Dr. Peter GOODWIN; my senior colleagues Prof.Dr.Bülent ÇAPLI, Assoc.Prof.Dr.Beybin KEJANLIOĞLU and Prof.Dr.Colin SPARKS; my graduate administrator Mike FISHER, and my friends Hakan TUNCEL, Aybige YILMAZ, Zümrüt SOMEL, Anastasia KAVADA and Ekin SAYINDI for the support, assistance, generosity and advice I received from them in many different ways and at many different times. I would also like to thank Prof.Dr.Çağrı ERHAN, Assoc.Prof.Dr. Burça KIZILIRMAK, Demet Halime SEZGEN and Deniz SEMENOĞLU at ATAUM for making this book possible. This book is dedicated to my wonderful parents Reyhan and Güneş SÜMER; without their unconditional love and enduring patience, I would not be the person I am today. Burcu SÜMER IV Glossary of Abbreviations AKP Justice and Development Party ANAP Motherland Party AP Accession Partnership AVMSD Audiovisual Media Services Directive BBC British Broadcasting Corporation BYDK High Auditing Board of the Prime Ministry CanWest CanWest Global Communications Corporation CEEs Central and Eastern Europe countries CHP Republican People’s Party CME Central European Media Enterprises CoE Council of Europe DSP Democratic Left Party DYP True Path Party EC European Community EEC European Economic Community EU European Union EPDK Electricity Market Regulatory Authority FCNM Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities FP Virtue Party HABER-SEN Media Communication and Postal Employees Union HYK Communications High Council IMCA International Media Consultants Associés IMF International Monetary Fund ISMMMO Istanbul Chamber of Certified Public Accountants KKR Kolberg Kravis Roberts & Co. MGK National Security Council MHP Nationalist Action Party MÜSIAD Independent Association of Industrialists and Businessmen, NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organisation NGO Non-governmental Organisation OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OMC Open method of coordination OSCE Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe PKK Kurdish Workers Party V RATEM Professional Union of Radio and Television Broadcasters RK Advertising Council RTL Radio Télévision Luxembourg RTÜK Radio and Television Supreme Council RTYK High Commission for Radio and Television SBS Scandinavian Broadcasting System (Broadcasting Group) SP Felicity Party TAF Turkish Armed Forces TBMM Turkish Grand National Assembly TESEV Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation TGRT Türkiye Gazetesi Radyo Televizyonu TGS Journalists’ Union of Turkey TİAK Turkish Audience Research Board TK Telecommunications Authority TMG Telegraaf Media Groep N.V. TMSF Savings Deposit Insurance Fund TOBB Union of Chambers and Commodity Exchanges of Turkey TRT Turkish Radio and Television Corporation TÜPRAŞ Turkish Petrelium Refineries Corporation TÜRK-İŞ Confederation of Turkish Labour Unions TÜSİAD Turkish Industrialists’ and Businessmen’s Association TVYD TV Broadcasters Association TWF Television Without Frontiers (Directive) UK United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization US United States of America YÖK Turkish Higher Education Council YTB Local Televisions Union VI CONTENTS ABSTRACT............................................................................................................................III ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................IV GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS......................................................................................V TABLES..................................................................................................................................XI INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................1 CHAPTER ONE UNDERSTANDING EUROPEANISATION 1.1. Setting the Context: Europe Matters”...............................................................................19 1.2. Research on Europe: Puzzling with the Concepts ............................................................21 1.2.1.Internationalisation and Europeanistation ................................................................22 1.2.2. Globalisation and Europeanisation..........................................................................29 1.3. Unpacking Europeanisation: The Implications of the Concept.........................................35 1.3.1.Europeanisation as Governance ...............................................................................37 1.3.2. Europeanisation as Institutionalisation....................................................................42 1.3.2.1. Rationalist/Actor Based Institutionalism ....................................................47 1.3.2.2. Sociological and Historical Institutionalism ...............................................49 1.3.3.Europeanisation from a Non-membership Perspective.............................................51 1.4. Europeanisation from a Non-Membership Perspective: In sights on the Accession Process.................................................................................................55 CHAPTER TWO SO NEAR, YET SO FAR: THE CONTEXT OF TURKEY-EU RELATIONS 2.1. Introduction: The Shadows of the Past ............................................................................63 2.2. Europe-Turkey Relations, 1945-1999: From “Strategic Partnership” to “Candidacy...................................................................................................................70 2.2.1.The Aftermath of the Second World War.................................................................70 2.2.2. The Mediterranean Expansion and the End of the Cold War ..................................72 2.2.3.Copenhagen
Recommended publications
  • A Success Story Or a Failure? : Representing the European Integration in the Curricula and Textbooks of Five Countries
    I Inari Sakki A Success Story or a Failure? Representing the European Integration in the Curricula and Textbooks of Five Countries II Social psychological studies 25 Publisher: Social Psychology, Department of Social Research, University of Helsinki Editorial Board: Klaus Helkama, Chair Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti, Editor Karmela Liebkind Anna-Maija Pirttilä-Backman Kari Mikko Vesala Maaret Wager Jukka Lipponen Copyright: Inari Sakki and Unit of Social Psychology University of Helsinki P.O. Box 4 FIN-00014 University of Helsinki I wish to thank the many publishers who have kindly given the permission to use visual material from their textbooks as illustrations of the analysis. All efforts were made to find the copyright holders, but sometimes without success. Thus, I want to apologise for any omissions. ISBN 978-952-10-6423-4 (Print) ISBN 978-952-10-6424-1 (PDF) ISSN 1457-0475 Cover design: Mari Soini Yliopistopaino, Helsinki, 2010 III ABSTRAKTI Euroopan yhdentymisprosessin edetessä ja syventyessä kasvavat myös vaatimukset sen oikeutuksesta. Tästä osoituksena ovat muun muassa viimeaikaiset mediassa käydyt keskustelut EU:n perustuslakiäänestysten seurauksista, kansalaisten EU:ta ja euroa kohtaan osoittamasta ja tuntemasta epäluottamuksesta ja Turkin EU-jäsenyydestä. Taloudelliset ja poliittiset argumentit tiiviimmän yhteistyön puolesta eivät aina riitä kansalaisten tuen saamiseen ja yhdeksi ratkaisuksi on esitetty yhteisen identiteetin etsimistä. Eurooppalaisen identiteetin sanotaan voivan parhaiten muodostua silloin, kun perheen, koulutuksen
    [Show full text]
  • The Europeanisation of Consular Affairs: the Case of Visa Policy
    DISCUSSION PAPERS IN DIPLOMACY The Europeanisation of Consular Affairs: The Case of Visa Policy Ana Mar Fernández Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’ ISSN 1569-2981 DISCUSSION PAPERS IN DIPLOMACY Editor: Dominic Kelly, University of Warwick Managing Editor: Jan Melissen, Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’ and Antwerp University Desk top publishing: Desiree Davidse Editorial Board Karin Aggestam, Lund University Geoff Berridge, University of Leicester Rik Coolsaet, University of Ghent Erik Goldstein, Boston University Alan Henrikson, Tufts University Donna Lee, Birmingham University Spencer Mawby, University of Nottingham Paul Sharp, University of Minnesota Duluth Copyright Notice © Ana Mar Fernández 2006 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy, or transmission of this publication, or part thereof in excess of one paragraph (other than as a PDF file at the discretion of the Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael) may be made without the written permission of the author. EUROPEANISATION OF THE CONSULAR FUNCTION: THE VISA POLICY Ana Mar Fernández 1 INTRODUCTION The process of European integration challenges the concept of sovereignty. Since 1950, when six states decided to integrate economically and unite politically, an alternative to the traditional political order has developed. The Westphalian model of authority and representation controlling all functions of government over a given territory has been progressively substituted by a system that is more diffuse and multilateral, while at the same time communitarian and co-operative, supranational and intergovernmental. The process of European integration transforms the exercise of power. It conditions the autonomy of member states, forcing them to adapt the functioning of their institutional structures, the design and implementation of their policies, the identification of their values and the formulation of their interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Britain, Ireland and Schengen: Time for a Smarter Bargain on Visas Michael Emerson No
    Britain, Ireland and Schengen: Time for a smarter bargain on visas Michael Emerson No. 249, August 2011 Given Britain’s desire to maintain its own border controls, it will not join the EU’s passport-free ‘Schengen’ area in the foreseeable future. Ireland also has to stay out because it shares a common travel area with the UK. But there is now mounting evidence that this situation hurts tourism and businesses in Britain and Ireland. Non- European travellers can move freely between Schengen countries with a single visa, and many skip the further hassle of getting visas to visit Britain or Ireland. Already the Schengen area has an agreement to facilitate Chinese group tourism, which is growing fast, and from which the UK and Ireland are excluded. This problem could be overcome if Britain, Ireland and the Schengen countries would agree on ‘mutual recognition’ of the visas they issue, without the UK or Ireland having to scrap their border controls. or the present UK government, full A case of simple economics for Britain accession to the Schengen area, a passport- and Ireland free travel area covering most of Europe, is F For many people, the cost and hassle of obtaining a red line that it will not cross. Ireland shares a common travel area and land border with the UK visas for business purposes or to go on holiday and is also bound by this decision. However, it is act as a deterrent. One of the achievements of the becoming increasingly clear that the UK, along EU internal market, with free movement of with Ireland, is suffering serious economic and goods, services, capital and people, is that visitors reputational costs as a result of its separate visa from the rest of the world view the Union as a and border management policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Felix Baumgartner & Red Bull Media
    Issue No. 14 MediaTainmentFINANCEd Appreciate the Value to Business MIPCube fever is back For Decision-Makers and StrategistsmentMT; @JayKayMed Creativity Brings The second edition of the Who Value Creativity an Expendables producer in WWII drama future-of-TV event heats up www.mediatainmentfinance.com Head to Cannes Facebook: MediaTainment Finance; during MIPTV 8-11 April 2013 Twitter: @Mediatain or Tune into www.mipcube.com nvestors spin new Carmaggedon … 3-14 quin romances e-books NEWS Toast & Jam goes sweet on film ; film: Print mediaNitin Sawhneytune into TV;in direct-to-disc Goldman Sachs history sells 50% of CSI page 15 tv: UK tax relief delayed; I Qatar fund 3D printer escalates revolutionises stake in Tiffany’s home building music: Time Warner; Harle games: Stephen King’s novel digital campaign stuck right in the middle of fashion: dia collaborations architecture: India backs theme-park tourism books/prints:Europe’s Illegal richest to retransmit soccerPhotographer players live broadcastin censorship lawsuit country has spawned some of the world’s ads/marketing: sport: page 26 page 34 copyright: investors are lining up for Sports, a share brand … and me Europe’s biggest economy is live entertainment: r jumped from the edge of space and became photography/art: have denounced it as “the FEATURES & REPORTS Don’t turn your nose GERMANY: just text and be key to the never-ending fiscal euro crisis; but this of America’s most respected TV channels; biggest media empires, and foreign s its country of origin, Qatar, fit in? … MIPCube Feature: FELIX The USBAUMGARTNER Administration is said to &page 39 RED BULL MEDIA HOUSE flew to new heights when skydiver Baumgartne the first human to break the speed of sound in free fall; ngfind devices out how might Red hold Bull more and Red than Bull Media House used new technology to give him wings - literally ..
    [Show full text]
  • Globalization and Language: English in Turkey
    SOSYAL B L MLER Y l:2004 Cilt:2 Say :1 Celal Bayar Üniversitesi S.B.E MAN SA Globalization And Language: English In Turkey Yrd. Doç. Dr. Kezban Acar Celal Bayar Üniversitesi, Fen-Edebiyat Fakultesi, Tarih Bölümü, Manisa ÖZET Globalle me ve onun yerel kültürlere etkileri üzerinde çok farkl görü ler vard r. Bunlardan biri globalle meyi bat lla ma veya Amerikanla ma olarak tan mlar çünkü bat l güçler veya daha da spesifik anlamda Amerika Birle ik Devletleri dünyada ekonomisi, askerî yap s ve kültürü ile bask n olan tek dünya gücüdür [ve] globalle menin en çok bilinen görünür kültürel ifadeleri American- coca cola, McDonald s and CNN de bunu destekler niteliktedir.(Giddens. 2000, 33) Globalle menin di er bir kültürel ifadesi de ngilizcenin giderek yayg nla mas d r. Bu makale ngilizcenin Türkiye de yayg nla mas n inceler. ngilizcenin Türkiye de yay lma yollar bir anlamda global kültürün veya Amerikan kültürünün yay lma yollar na i aret eder. Anahtar Kelimeler:Globalle me, Türkiye, ngilizce, Amerikanla ma. Globalle me Ve Dil: Türkiye de ngilizce There are many different opinions on globalization and its effects on local cultures. One of them is that globalization is westernization or more specifically Americanization since western powers or the United States is now the sole superpower, with a dominant economic, cultural and military position in the global order [and] many of the most visible cultural expressions of globalization are American-coca cola, McDonald s and CNN. (Giddens, 2000, 33) In contrast to this view of globalization, many others consider globalization as a multi-way process.
    [Show full text]
  • Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Eurosphere(s)? Fragmented and stratified or integrated and fair? A conceptual and pre-theoretical mapping exercise Bader, V. Publication date 2008 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Bader, V. (2008). Eurosphere(s)? Fragmented and stratified or integrated and fair? A conceptual and pre-theoretical mapping exercise. (Eurosphere online working paper; No. 09). Eurosphere. http://eurospheres.org/files/2010/08/Eurosphere_Working_Paper_9_Bader.pdf General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:28 Sep 2021 EUROSPHERE WORKING PAPER SERIES Online W orking Paper No. 09, 2008 Eurospheres? Fragmented and Stratified or Integrated
    [Show full text]
  • EUROSPHERE Comparative Report WP 6.1/2 Van De BEEK, VERMEULEN & LAGERSPETZ
    EUROSPHERE Comparative Report WP 6.1/2 van de BEEK, VERMEULEN & LAGERSPETZ EUROSPHERE COMPARATIVE STUDIES Work Package 6.1/2 Report, 2011 Minorities, the European Polity and a nascent European Public Sphere & Nationalizing spaces Jan H. van de Beek Floris Vermeulen Mikko Lagerspetz This paper can be downloaded without charge from: http://eurospheres.org/publications/workpackage-reports/ ISSN 1890-5986 EUROSPHERE Comparative Report WP 6.1/2 van de BEEK, VERMEULEN & LAGERSPETZ EUROSPHERE ONLINE WORKING PAPER SERIES Title: WP6.1/2 – Minorities, the European Polity and a nascent European Public Sphere & Nationalizing spaces Authors: Jan H. van de Beek Floris Vermeulen Mikko Lagerspetz This version: October 2011 Webpage: http://eurospheres.org/publications/workpackage-reports/ © EUROSPHERE, 2011 http://eurospheres.org © 2011 by authors All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including notice, is given to the source. The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect those of the EUROSPHERE Project. The statement of purpose for the EUROSPHERE Online Working Paper Series is available from the EUROSPHERE working papers website, http://eurospheres.org/publications/workpackage-reports/ Author Contact Information: Jan H. van de Beek University of Amsterdam the Netherlands [email protected] Floris Vermeulen University of Amsterdam the Netherlands [email protected] Mikko Lagerspetz Tallinn University Estonia [email protected] ISSN 1890-5986 (online) EUROSPHERE Comparative Report WP 6.1/2 van de BEEK, VERMEULEN & LAGERSPETZ Table of Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 2 Actor selection and a priori categorization ............................................................................. 4 2.1 Introduction: three categories of ethnic groups...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Türkisch + Kurdisch + German 590 Channels
    Türkisch + Kurdisch + German 590 Channels CNN Turk NTV Avrupa Planet Cocuk E2 Turk Shopping Turk Haberturk NTV Sport TV4 Turkey Mavi Karadeniz Med Nuce A Haber HD Sports Tv Eins Festival Kanal Tek Kurdistan S-Haber A Spor Travel Channel Turk Methab TV Knn News A Haber A Spor HD TGRT Belgesel Planet Turk Kurdsat Star Tv Turkiye FB Tv Yaban Tv Planet Mutfak Tishk TV Euro Star TGRT Kral TV Planet Pembe Rojhelat Fox Túrkye TGRT Haber Kral Pop Kanal C Speeda Kanal D Turkiye BRT 1 Köy Tv Maxi Tv Komala TV Euro D 365 Tv Power Turk Uzay Tv Newroz TV ATV Avrupa TRT 1 Nr 1 Turk MCJ Madiasa Shant TV ATV turkiye TRT Turk Gala Tv Yildiz Tv Gali Kurdistan ATV HD TRT Haber Viva Turkey Dost Tv Kanal 4 Kurd Show tv TRT Spor iMusic 1 Berat TV Korek TV Show Tv Turkey TRT Muzik Tatlises TV Sebil Tv Vin TV Show Turk HD TRT Belgesel Kanal T Irmak Tv NRT HD Samanyoulu Turkey TRT Cocuk Kanal S Ulusal Kanal Ronahi Kurdistan Samanyoulu TRT Avaz Tv 2000 Mmc Turk KurdMax TV8 TRT 6 EGE Tv Expo Channel Med Music TV8 Int TRT Diyanet Kon Tv HLT Flava Flash TV TRT HD Konya Tv Turk Hristiyan TV Bliss Bengu Turk TRT 1 HD Sivas SRT Kanal 5 Scuzz Cine5 Euro TRT Haber HD Turkmeneli Kanal 34 True Movies 1 Cine5 Turkiye Yamurack Tv Tek Rumeli TV Kanal 26 True Movies 2 Kanal 7 HD Cartoon Network Turkiye Ictimai TV Kanal 99 Tiny Pop Kanal 7 Avrupa Disney Turk Semerkend TV Avantaj tv Buz Muzik Tv2 Turk Karamel Semerkend HD Kanal B Tiny Pop +1 TV2 HD Kix Kids CCTV News GUNEYDOGU TV Pop Tv Halk Tv MinikaGo Gunaz Tv Dunya TV The Vault NTV Minika Cocuk CNBC-E Turk Sterk Tv PopGirl
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEANIZATION and POLITICAL PARTIES Towards a Framework for Analysis
    01 Ladrech (JG/d) 28/5/02 11:38 am Page 389 PARTY POLITICS VOL 8. No.4 pp. 389–403 Copyright © 2002 SAGE Publications London Thousand Oaks New Delhi EUROPEANIZATION AND POLITICAL PARTIES Towards a Framework for Analysis Robert Ladrech ABSTRACT Europeanization is a term used to describe the effects of European integration on the politics and policies of its member states as well as the process of enhancing European-level political institutions. Within this growing literature there is no systematic effort to incorporate the role of political parties. However, party analysis has only recently begun to acknowledge the EU as an environment that holds potentially signifi- cant consequences for parties. In this article, I attempt to begin system- atic research on Europeanization and political parties by presenting a basic framework for analysis. Five areas are singled out: (1) policy/programmatic content; (2) organization; (3) patterns of party competition; (4) party-government relations; and (5) relations beyond the national party system. KEY WORDS Ⅲ Europeanization organizational adaptation political parties Introduction Europeanization is a term that has insidiously crept into the literature on European Union policy-making. In its broadest meaning, it refers to responses by actors – institutional and otherwise – to the impact of European integration. The responses may themselves influence the direction of European integration. Although more precise meanings vary (see below), a common denominator in most uses of the term is the identification of a national-supranational nexus regarding authoritative policy decisions. Consequently, most efforts involve the identification of appropriate levels of analysis, key institutional actors and policy competence ownership; employ- ing network analogies, etc., all as part of the attempt to label a process of 1354-0688(200207)8:4;389–403;024533 01 Ladrech (JG/d) 28/5/02 11:38 am Page 390 PARTY POLITICS 8(4) change and adaptation which is understood to be a consequence of the development of the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • CEPS Wider Europe Matrix E-Version
    THE WIDER EUROPE MATRIX THE WIDER EUROPE MATRIX MICHAEL EMERSON PREFACE BY GÜNTER VERHEUGEN CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN POLICY STUDIES BRUSSELS The Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) is an independent policy research institute in Brussels. Its mission is to produce sound policy research leading to constructive solutions to the challenges facing Europe. The views expressed are entirely those of the authors. CEPS Paperbacks present analysis and views by leading experts on important questions in the arena of European public policy. They are written in a style geared to an informed but generalist readership of policy-makers, government officials and corporate executives. This book was prepared at the invitation of Aspen Italia, in the context of the Italian Presidency of the European Union in the second half of 2003. Financial support from the Compagnia di San Paolo, Torino, is gratefully acknowledged. The paper also draws on a current project supported by the Science Policy Office of the Belgian federal government on conflict management in the divided states of the European periphery, undertaken by CEPS in collaboration with the Free University of Brussels (VUB); and on a recent project on the Middle East supported by the UK Department for International Development (DFID). The text was finalised on 17 December 2003. Graphic designs by 6A Architects, London (www.6a.co.uk). ISBN 92-9079-469-0 © Copyright 2004, Centre for European Policy Studies. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means – electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise – without the prior permission of the Centre for European Policy Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Europeanisation of Turkish Foreign Policy Towards the Middle East
    THE EUROPEANISATION OF TURKISH FOREIGN POLICY TOWARDS THE MIDDLE EAST A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy DEFNE GUNAY Department of Politics The University of Sheffield October 2012 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Doing a PhD is not easy. My PhD turned out to be the most difficult journey that I have taken in my life. But thankfully I had amazing help and company in this journey. My family has always stood by me in all the ups and downs and they have never lost their faith in me. I owe this thesis to their support. I am grateful for my mum’s, dad’s, aunt’s, grandmother’s help and support throughout this journey. My supervisors Simon Bulmer and Ian Bache have been encouraging and supportive at all stages of the PhD and I am grateful for their supervision. Simon has always managed to find time for supervision despite his very busy schedule to give me the most helpful advice and guidance for my research. Thanks to Ian’s very valuable feedback on the first draft. I am also grateful that I have known lovely people in Elmfield and the GRC over the past five years in Sheffield: Jojo, Laura, Gabe, Flo, Adie, Dai, Rory, Ali, Hilal, Nuray, Joe who have shared their jokes, pints and shopping adventures with me. Thanks to Alaaddin for his lovely cat videos and his support. Suruchi has always been there for me throughout my five years in Sheffield, simply sharing everything with me including houses, successes and fears. Ozlem has always comforted me in our ‘Cesop’ discussions by comforting me that he is impossible to comprehend, while Berna and Özgün have always encouraged us to have faith in ourselves.
    [Show full text]
  • SCHENGEN”: a RACE AGAINST the TIME OR a FOOLS’ GAME? Yves Bertoncini | Director, Jacques Delors Institute
    TRIBUNE VIEWPOINT JANUARY 27, 2015 “SCHENGEN”: A RACE AGAINST THE TIME OR A FOOLS’ GAME? Yves Bertoncini | director, Jacques Delors Institute António Vitorino | president, Jacques Delors Institute T he “Schengen area” crisis is not merely a crisis in solidarity, but also, primarily, a crisis in the trust between co-owners that have no wish to move out of their shared abode. It makes for a race against time between bringing back national border controls and the Europeanisation of external border controls, a race whose conclusion must allow us to reinforce Schengen. In this Viewpoint, Yves Bertoncini and António Vitorino focus on three key issues. 1. Addressing the migrant crisis: enforced project have the merit of responding at once to the solidarity, ongoing mistrust lack of solidarity and to the lack of trust among the Schengen area’s member states. On the pretext of Facing the migration crisis, the deficit in solidar- helping the swamped countries in both financial and ity among the EU member states has manifested human terms, it is also a way of despatching national notably in the difficulty of establishing a balanced and European experts to areas where they can ensure burden-sharing scheme for the flows of asylum-seek- that the Union’s external borders are effectively mon- ers. To remedy the situation, the Commission pushed itored and that the asylum-seekers really are regis- through a relocation scheme, intending to relieve tered. That is exactly why these projects have sparked such swamped countries as Greece and Italy and call- such reticence on the part of the countries that could ing to benefit 160,000 asylum-seekers over two years, benefit from them, especially if they do not work in but which has been implemented in a downright fee- parallel on an effective relocation of asylum seekers.
    [Show full text]