DOCSLIB.ORG

Mastering Space: Hegemony, Territory and International Political Economy/John Agnew and Stuart Corbridge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mastering Space: Hegemony, Territory and International Political Economy/John Agnew and Stuart Corbridge MASTERING SPACE For over two hundred years the domination of some countries by others has been intrinsic to international relations, with national economic and political strength viewed as essential to a nation’s survival and global position. Mastering Space identifies the essential features of this ‘state-centredness’ and suggests an optimistic alternative more in keeping with the contemporary post-Cold War climate. Drawing on recent geopolitical thinking, the authors claim that the dynamism of the international political economy has been obscured through excessive attention to the state as an unchanging actor. Dealing with such topical issues as Japan’s rise to economic dominance and America’s perceived decline, as well as the global impact of continued geographical change, the book discusses the role of geographical organization in the global political economy, and the impact of increasing economic globalization and political fragmentation in future international relations. The authors identify the present time as crucial to the global political economy, and explore the possibilities of moving the world from mastering space to real reciprocity between peoples and places. John Agnew is a Professor of Geography at the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University. Stuart Corbridge is a Lecturer in Geography at the University of Cambridge and a Fellow of Sidney Sussex College. MASTERING SPACE Hegemony, territory and international political economy John Agnew and Stuart Corbridge London and New York First published 1995 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2003. Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 © 1995 John Agnew and Stuart Corbridge All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication Data Agnew, John A. Mastering space: hegemony, territory and international political economy/John Agnew and Stuart Corbridge. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Geopolitics. 2. World politics. 3. International relations. 4. International economic relations. I. Corbridge, Stuart. II. Title. JCCC319.A45 320.1'2–dc20 94–22292 ISBN 0-203-42238-4 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-203-73062-3 (Adobe eReader Format) ISBN 0-415-09433-X (hbk) ISBN 0-415-09434-8 (pbk) CONTENTS List of figures vii List of tables viii Preface ix Acknowledgements xiii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 International relations and international political economy 2 Space and geopolitics 3 The organization of the book 7 Part I Mastering space 2 GEOPOLITICAL ORDER 13 Spatial ontology 13 The concept of geopolitical order 15 The three geopolitical orders 19 Two alternative schemes 24 The Concert of Europe—British Geopolitical Order (1815–75) 26 The Geopolitical Order of Inter-Imperial Rivalry (1875–1945) 31 The Cold War Geopolitical Order (1945–90) 37 Conclusion 44 3 GEOPOLITICAL DISCOURSE 46 Geopolitical discourse 46 The origins and continuity of modern geopolitical discourse 49 Civilizational geopolitics 52 Naturalized geopolitics 56 Ideological geopolitics 65 Conclusion 76 4 THE TERRITORIAL TRAP 78 Space and spatiality in social science 79 The territorial state and international relations theory 80 v CONTENTS Emerging spatial forms 95 Conclusion 100 Part II Hegemony/territory/globalization: the geopolitics of international political economy 5 ‘HEGEMONIC’ INSTABILITY AND THE RELATIVE DECLINE OF THE UNITED STATES 103 Hegemonic succession and hegemonic stability 103 The relative decline of the United States 106 Continuing American leadership 113 American hegemony versus the US territorial economy 118 Conclusion 127 6 ‘HEGEMONIC PRETENDERS’ 130 The pursuit of primacy 130 The Soviet collapse and Russia as a Great Power 135 The Chinese challenge 140 The Japanese enigma 145 Germany, again? 151 Trading blocs 155 Conclusion 163 7 TRANSNATIONAL LIBERALISM 164 Internationalization and globalization 165 ‘Glocalization’ and the internationalization of state activities 188 Conclusion 205 Part III The elements of a new geopolitical discourse 8 MASTERING SPACE OR EMPOWERING COMMUNITIES? 211 Mastering space 212 Globalization and real multilateralism 214 Globalization, identity and representation 216 Globalization, citizenship and historical consciousness 219 Globalization, the market and ‘market socialism’ 221 Conclusion: discourse counts 227 References 228 Index 250 vi FIGURES 2.1 The nature of US-Soviet relations, 1948–91 42 2.2 The zone of most serious US-Soviet indirect conflict, A 1948–68; B 1969–88 43 3.1 Europe as a ‘Queen’ 53 3.2 The pan-regions of Nazi geopolitics 59 3.3 Mackinder’s ‘heartland model’ 64 3.4 How far is it to the Gulf? Trends in US and Soviet access to airfields or airspace 69 3.5 The semiotics of the ‘three worlds’ 71 5.1 Potential causal relationships involved in long-waves of leading sector development 107 5.2 Gross federal debt as a percentage of US GNP, 1950–90 112 5.3 US export volume (1986–91), relative productivity gains (1979–89) and business fixed investment (1980–91) 115 5.4 US defence spending, fiscal years 1890–2000 122 5.5 US current account, 1950–88 123 5.6 Regional per capita incomes as a percentage of US average, 1982–7 125 5.7 Japan’s investment imbalance, fiscal years 1985–93 127 6.1 The nuclear weapons of the former Soviet Union 141 6.2 The circuits of world trade in the late 1970s 158 6.3 The downward trend of EC GDP, 1961–92 160 7.1 World distribution of offshore financial centres 175 7.2 Global shrinkage: the effect of changing transport technologies on real distance 184 7.3 Inflation in the 1970s 189 7.4 The reshaping of hegemony after the Cold War 206 vii TABLES 1.1 Leading states and types of power resources, fifteenth to twentieth centuries 4 2.1 A framework for the analysis of a geopolitical order 21 2.2 Wallerstein’s cycles of hegemony 25 2.3 Modelski’s long-cycles of world leadership 25 2.4 The geographical development of the world economy in the nineteenth century 28 2.5 World trade, 1876–1937 34 2.6 Threats to US security in three eras according to Art (1991) 38 2.7 Three phases of US hegemony 41 3.1 The dance of the dinosaurs: US and Soviet procurement of major weapons systems, 1977–86 67 4.1 Conventional and ‘ownership-based’ trade balances, US (1986) and Japan (1983) 91 5.1 Relative decline arguments 106 5.2 The US, Japan and the European Community in information technologies 108 6.1 South Korea (1970) and China (1991), comparison of output per capita 142 6.2 Which ‘bloc’ is number one? 157 7.1 The world’s top twenty corporations, 1992 (by market value) and selected countries, 1991 (by GDP) 170 7.2 International telephone traffic, selected countries, 1990 180 7.3 Leading information service companies in the world, 1986 and 1989 182 viii PREFACE In my opinion, the rights of man consist in the authorisation to take possession of all that is unoccupied and to defend all that has been so acquired (Moser 1790, in Meinecke, Historism: The Rise of a New Historical Outlook 1972, 285) the earth is in effect one world, in which empty, uninhabited spaces virtually do not exist. Just as none of us is outside or beyond geography, none of us is completely free from the struggle over geography. That struggle is complex and interesting because it is not only about soldiers and cannons but also about ideas, about forms, about images and imaginings (Said, Culture and Imperialism 1993, 7) Nately could scarcely believe his ears. He had never heard such shocking blasphemies before, and he wondered with instinctive logic why G- men did not appear to lock the traitorous old man up. ‘America is not going to be destroyed!’ he shouted passionately. ‘Never?’ prodded the old man softly. ‘Well…’ Nately faltered. The old man laughed indulgently, holding in check a deeper, more explosive delight. His goading remained gentle. ‘Rome was destroyed, Greece was destroyed, Persia was destroyed, Spain was destroyed. All great countries are destroyed. Why not yours? How much longer do you think your own country will last? Forever? Keep in mind that the earth itself is destined to be destroyed by the sun in twenty-five million years or so.’ Nately squirmed uncomfortably. ‘Well, forever is a long time, I guess’ (Heller, Catch 22 1962 [19773 edn, 259]) News and history are written in the context of a dominant discourse—a narrative drama that sets the terms in which events are judged. Following the ix PREFACE death of President Richard M.Nixon in April 1994, his foreign policy achievements were widely praised. Yet most eulogies missed one of the most enduring of Nixon’s actions: the decision to abrogate the Bretton Woods monetary system in 1971. The reason lies in the fact that the Big Story in which Nixon’s presidency was set was the Cold War; in this context what mattered most about Nixon’s period in office was the American opening to China and US détente with the former Soviet Union. International economics was secondary. With the end of the Cold War the discourse emerging into dominance is one about a world that is becoming more and more economically interdependent. Whatever his other successes and failures, President Clinton’s lobbying for NAFTA (the trade agreement with Mexico and Canada), and on behalf of global trade in the GATT (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade), will loom large in any future account of his presidency.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • From Hegemony to Ambivalence. Nato's Transformation and European Stability
    FROM HEGEMONY TO AMBIVALENCE. NATO'S TRANSFORMATION AND EUROPEAN STABILITY by Marco Cesa Università di Bologna Facoltà di Scienze Politiche and The Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies Bologna Center Fellowships Programme 1997-1999 Final Report submitted to NATO, Office of Information and Press, June 30 1999. NOT TO BE QUOTED WITHOUT PERMISSION 2 CONTENTS: Introduction p. 3 1. The Limits of Alliance Theory p. 4 2. Alliances: A Typology p. 7 3. NATO after the End of the Cold War p. 14 4. The Leader Asserts Itself... p. 18 4.1 Who’s Afraid of the European Pillar? p. 20 4.2 Bigger Is Better (or Isn’t It?) p. 24 4.3 Out of Area or Out of Business p. 28 5. ... and the Followers Reluctantly Comply p. 30 Tables p. 34 Bibiliography p. 35 Abstract p. 40 3 Introduction Although the scholarly literature on alliances is extremely rich and variegated1, it is no exaggeration to argue that its conceptual and theoretical content leaves something to be desired2. In the work of political scientists and analysts, alliances are invariably seen as aggregations of power, reflecting either the need to face some threat or the opportunity of achieving some gain. But diplomatic historians know better. Indeed, they often show that the functions performed by alliances are not simply confined to a third, external, party: in fact, most alliances involve functions of reciprocal control and management among the allies: in many alliances, the partners try and restrain or influence each other, and what is often at issue is not merely the pursuit of the collective interests of the alliance but the coexistence of various national interests.
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Comparison of Non-Sovereign Island Territories: the Search for ‘True Equality’
    Island Studies Journal, 15(1), 2020, 43-66 A global comparison of non-sovereign island territories: the search for ‘true equality’ Malcom Ferdinand CNRS, Paris, France [email protected] Gert Oostindie KITLV, the Netherlands Leiden University, the Netherlands [email protected] (corresponding author) Wouter Veenendaal KITLV, the Netherlands Leiden University, the Netherlands [email protected] Abstract: For a great majority of former colonies, the outcome of decolonization was independence. Yet scattered across the globe, remnants of former colonial empires are still non-sovereign as part of larger metropolitan states. There is little drive for independence in these territories, virtually all of which are small island nations, also known as sub-national island jurisdictions (SNIJs). Why do so many former colonial territories choose to remain non-sovereign? In this paper we attempt to answer this question by conducting a global comparative study of non-sovereign jurisdictions. We start off by analyzing their present economic, social and political conditions, after which we assess local levels of (dis)content with the contemporary political status, and their articulation in postcolonial politics. We find that levels of discontent and frustration covary with the particular demographic, socio- economic and historical-cultural conditions of individual territories. While significant independence movements can be observed in only two or three jurisdictions, in virtually all cases there is profound dissatisfaction and frustration with the contemporary non-sovereign arrangement and its outcomes. Instead of achieving independence, the territories’ real struggle nowadays is for obtaining ‘true equality’ with the metropolis, as well as recognition of their distinct cultural identities.
    [Show full text]
  • Tangled Complicities and Moral Struggles: the Haushofers, Father and Son, and the Spaces of Nazi Geopolitics
    Journal of Historical Geography 47 (2015) 64e73 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Historical Geography journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jhg Feature: European Geographers and World War II Tangled complicities and moral struggles: the Haushofers, father and son, and the spaces of Nazi geopolitics Trevor J. Barnes a,* and Christian Abrahamsson b a Department of Geography, University of British Columbia, 1984 West Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada b Department of Sociology and Human Geography, University of Oslo, Postboks 1096 Blindern, Oslo 0317, Norway Abstract Drawing on a biographical approach, the paper explores the tangled complicities and morally fraught relationship between the German father and son political geographers, Karl and Albrecht Haushofer, and the Nazi leadership. From the 1920s both Haushofers were influential within Nazism, although at different periods and under different circumstances. Karl Haushofer’s complicity began in 1919 with his friendship with Rudolf Hess, an undergraduate student he taught political geography at the University of Munich. Hess introduced Haushofer to Adolf Hitler the following year. In 1924 Karl provided jail-house instruction in German geopolitical theory to both men while they served an eight-and-a-half month prison term for treason following the ‘beer-hall putsch’ of November 1923. Karl’s prison lectures were significant because during that same period Hitler wrote Mein Kampf. In that tract, Hitler justifies German expansionism using Lebensraum, one of Haushofer’s key ideas. It is here that there is a potential link between German geopolitics and the subsequent course of the Second World War. Albrecht Haushofer’s complicity began in the 1930s when he started working as a diplomat for Joachim von Ribbentrop in a think-tank within the Nazi Foreign Ministry.
    [Show full text]
  • NEOREALIST and NEO-GRAMSCIAN HEGEMONY in INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS and CONFLICT RESOLUTION DURING the 1990’S
    Ekonomik ve Sosyal Ara ştırmalar Dergisi, Güz 2005, 1:88-114 NEOREALIST AND NEO-GRAMSCIAN HEGEMONY IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION DURING THE 1990’s Sezai ÖZÇEL İK George Mason University, Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution, 3330 N. Washington Blvd. Truland Building, 5th Floor Arlington, VA 22201 [email protected] 1990’LU YILLARDA ULUSLARARASI İLİŞ KİLER VE ÇATI ŞMA ÇÖZÜMÜNDE NEOREAL İZM VE NEO- GRAMS İYAN HEGEMONYA KAVRAMI Abstract The article aims to explain international relations and conflict resolution in combination with the neorealist and neo-Gramscian notions of the hegemony during the 1990s. In the first part, it focuses on neorealist hegemony theories. The Hegemonic Stability Theory (HST) is tested for viability as an explanatory tool of the Cold-War world politics and conflict resolution. Because of the limitations of neorealist hegemony theories, the neo-Gramscian hegemony and related concepts such as historic bloc, passive revolution, civil society and war of position/war of movement are elaborated. Later, the Coxian approach to international relations and world order is explained as a critical theory. Finally, the article attempts to establish a model of structural conflict analysis and resolution. Keywords: Neo-realism, Neo-Gramscian, Hegemony, Conflict Resolution, International Relations Özet Bu makale uluslararası ili şkiler ve çatı şma çözümü kuramlarını neorealist ve neo- Gramsiyan hegemonya kavramlarını çerçevesinde 1990’lı yılları kapsayacak şekilde açıklamayı hedeflemektedir. Birinci
    [Show full text]
  • The Select Methods of Investigations in Geostrategy and Geopolitics
    Political Geography Studies in Central and Eastern Europe Oradea - Gdansk, 2000, pag. 23 - 30 THE SELECT METHODS OF INVESTIGATIONS IN GEOSTRATEGY AND GEOPOLITICS Jan WENDT* ABSTRACT: After the years of silence and after avoidance of geopolitical researches and its subdisciplines, a renascence of his knowledge has come out. In the latest past years, we can notice a conspicuous increase of interest in nearly all kinds of researches, which are made by political geographers including people who deal with geostrategical and geopolitical problems. When we talk about Poland we must say that the increased interest is a result of breaking a kind of taboo - taboo, which refereed to the works of this sphere. Firstly, that the works were connected with the Third Reich polities and propaganda, and secondly, because of the easy way of censorship explanation, very common while making controversial studies in Poland during communistic times. The past ten years were abounding in accidents connected with boarder's changes and changes of geopolitical and geostrategical circumstances. Also, this is a period of time when the USSR fell into pieces, the European Community came into being, the process of globalisation has been progressing, and equally, a strong separatist and national movements have been developing not only in Europe. So, it's natural that interest in those problems has been native. Leaving back the classical fields of political geography, for instance: electoral geography or ecopolitic, we can surly state, we are just victims of a dynamic investigate development. The development refers to the rest geopolitical ranges - geostrategy and geopolitics, in particular. Because of that fount, it seems to be useful to tide up some notions connected with there disciplines and indicate the basic exploring methods of the occurrences shown in geostrategical and geopolitical works.
    [Show full text]
  • The Theory of Hegemonic Stability
    US-Western European Economic Relations, 1940-1973 Date Event Significance 1941-44 US-UK wartime Technocratic elites in both countries negotiate in negotiations on a new circumstances relatively free of normal domestic international monetary political pressure and trading system July 1944 Bretton Woods Creation of the Bretton Woods twins, the IMF and conference World Bank December 1945 US loan to Britain US attempt to force Britain to accept the Bretton agreed Woods rules June 1947 US Secretary of State A large step away from Bretton Woods towards direct Marshall announces US aid and promoting regionalism in Europe ‘Marshall aid’ July-August British pound returns to The final failure of Hull’s vision of forcing Britain to 1947 convertibility, but this is accept Bretton Woods revoked as reserves are rapidly drained 30 October GATT signed in Geneva Interim agreement on trade principles, and draft 1947 agreement on the establishment of the ITO by 23 countries March 1948 Havana World Agreement on the charter of the ITO by over 60 Conference on Trade and countries Employment June 1950 Creation of European Facilitated the reconstruction of European trade and Payments Union payments on a regional basis, rather than on the basis of Bretton Woods April 1951 Signing of the Treaty of Creates the European Coal and Steel Community Paris March 1957 Signing of the Treaty of Creates the EEC and Euratom, the former leading to the Rome creation of a large trading bloc, changing the nature of GATT bargaining December 1958 European currencies The Bretton
    [Show full text]
  • The Commemoration of Founders and Benefactors at the Heart of Durham: City, County and Region
    The Commemoration of Founders and Benefactors at the heart of Durham: City, County and Region Address: Professor Stuart Corbridge Vice-Chancellor University of Durham Sunday 22 November 2020 3.30 p.m. VOLUMUS PRÆTEREA UT EXEQUIÆ SINGULIS ANNIS PERPETUIS TEMPORIBUS IN ECCLESIA DUNELMENSI, CONVOCATIS AD EAS DECANO OMNIBUS CANONICIS ET CÆTERIS MINISTRIS SCHOLARIBUS ET PAUPERIBUS, PRO ANIMABUS CHARISSIMORUM PROGENITORUM NOSTRORUM ET OMNIUM ANTIQUI CŒNOBII DUNELMENSIS FUNDATORUM ET BENEFACTORUM, VICESIMO SEPTIMO DIE JANUARII CUM MISSÂ IN CRASTINO SOLENNITER CELEBRENTUR. Moreover it is our will that each year for all time in the cathedral church of Durham on the twenty-seventh day of January, solemn rites of the dead shall be held, together with mass on the following day, for the souls of our dearest ancestors and of all the founders and benefactors of the ancient convent of Durham, to which shall be summoned the dean, all the canons, and the rest of the ministers, scholars and poor men. Cap. 34 of Queen Mary’s Statutes of Durham Cathedral, 1554 Translated by Canon Dr David Hunt, March 2014 2 Welcome Welcome to the annual commemoration of Founders and Benefactors. This service gives us an opportunity to celebrate those whose generosity in the past has enriched the lives of Durham’s great institutions today and to look forward to a future that is full of opportunity. On 27 January 1914, the then Dean, Herbert Hensley Henson, revived the Commemoration of Founders and Benefactors. It had been written into the Cathedral Statutes of 1554 but for whatever reason had not been observed for centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, PRINCIPAL THEORIES International Relations, Principal Theories
    INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, PRINCIPAL THEORIES International Relations, Principal Theories Anne-Marie Slaughter TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 B. Realism ................................................................................................................................................... 2 C. Institutionalism ....................................................................................................................................... 8 D. Liberalism ............................................................................................................................................. 14 E. Constructivism ...................................................................................................................................... 19 F. The English School ............................................................................................................................... 24 G. Critical Approaches .............................................................................................................................. 26 H. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................ 28 A. Introduction 1 The study of international relations takes a wide range of theoretical approaches. Some emerge from within the discipline itself; others have been imported, in
    [Show full text]
  • Trump, American Hegemony and the Future of the Liberal International Order
    Trump, American hegemony and the future of the liberal international order DOUG STOKES* The postwar liberal international order (LIO) has been a largely US creation. Washington’s consensus, geopolitically bound to the western ‘core’ during the Cold War, went global with the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the advent of systemic unipolarity. Many criticisms can be levelled at US leadership of the LIO, not least in respect of its claim to moral superiority, albeit based on laudable norms such as human rights and democracy. For often cynical reasons the US backed authoritarian regimes throughout the Cold War, pursued disastrous forms of regime change after its end, and has been deeply hostile to alternative (and often non-western) civilizational orders that reject its dogmas. Its successes, however, are manifold. Its ‘empire by invitation’ has helped secure a durable European peace, soften east Asian security dilemmas, and underwrite the strategic preconditions for complex and pacifying forms of global interdependence. Despite tactical differences between global political elites, a postwar commit- ment to maintain the LIO, even in the context of deep structural shifts in interna- tional relations, has remained resolute—until today. The British vote to leave the EU (arguably as much a creation of the United States as of its European members), has weakened one of the most important institutions of the broader US-led LIO. More destabilizing to the foundations of the LIO has been the election of President Trump. His administration has actively
    [Show full text]
  • Bound to Fail John J. Mearsheimer the Rise and Fall of the Liberal International Order
    Bound to Fail Bound to Fail John J. Mearsheimer The Rise and Fall of the Liberal International Order By 2019, it was clear that the liberal international order was in deep trouble. The tectonic plates that underpin it are shifting, and little can be done to repair and rescue it. Indeed, that order was destined to fail from the start, as it contained the seeds of its own destruction. The fall of the liberal international order horriªes the Western elites who built it and who have beneªted from it in many ways.1 These elites fervently believe that this order was and remains an important force for promoting peace and prosperity around the globe. Many of them blame President Donald Trump for its demise. After all, he expressed contempt for the liberal order when campaigning for president in 2016; and since taking ofªce, he has pur- sued policies that seem designed to tear it down. It would be a mistake, however, to think that the liberal international order is in trouble solely because of Trump’s rhetoric or policies. In fact, more funda- mental problems are at play, which account for why Trump has been able to successfully challenge an order that enjoys almost universal support among the foreign policy elites in the West. The aim of this article is to determine why the liberal world order is in big trouble and to identify the kind of inter- national order that will replace it. I offer three main sets of arguments. First, because states in the modern world are deeply interconnected in a variety of ways, orders are essential for facilitating efªcient and timely interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • PSA Parliament Week Event – Britain's
    PSAnews Vol24 No 4 | 2013 psa.ac.uk PSA Parliament Week event – Britain’s BME Politicians: The Next Generation James Chiriyankandath, Chair, PSA Diversity & Equality Group As part of Parliament Week, the House in Westminster on Tuesday, is from a BME background. involved in local politics and annual UK-wide programme of 19 November. In keeping with Over 130 students from fourteen community activism before being events and activities led by the this year’s focus on “Women in schools and colleges, the majority selected as the Labour candidate House of Commons designed Democracy”, an all women panel BME and female, attended. They in Hackney North and Stoke to engage and connect people discussed the participation of the heard the veteran Labour MP Diane Newington. She was followed by with parliamentary democracy, nearly one in six Britons of black Abbott, who in 1987 became the Christina Dykes, a senior adviser the Association’s Diversity and and minority ethnic heritage in first black woman ever elected to to Dominic Grieve, the Attorney Equality Group organised a democratic institutions – only 1 the Commons, speak passionately General, and former director of the panel discussion for GCE A and in 25 members of the Commons about what inspired her interest Conservative Party’s Development AS level students at Portcullis and 1 in 20 of the House of Lords in politics and how she first got continued on page 3 INSIDE THIS ISSUE Report from Universities Matter: how academic social science contributes to public policy impact PSA Awards Is Britain
    [Show full text]
  • Theories of Hegemony in International Relations: Ontology and Social
    Hegemony and international relations Article (Accepted Version) Antoniades, Andreas (2018) Hegemony and international relations. International Politics, 55 (5). pp. 595-611. ISSN 1384-5748 This version is available from Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/70470/ This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies and may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the URL above for details on accessing the published version. Copyright and reuse: Sussex Research Online is a digital repository of the research output of the University. Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable, the material made available in SRO has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk A VERSION OF THIS PAPER IS FORTCOMING IN THE JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL POLITICS HEGEMONY AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Andreas Antoniades Senior Lecturer in Global Political Economy Department of International Relations University of Sussex Brighton BN1 9SN, UK Tel: +44 (0)1273 872875 Email: [email protected] Abstract The paper interrogates the current state-of-the-art in hegemony analysis in International Relations (IR).
    [Show full text]