<<

TECTONOPHYSICS

ELSEVIER Tectonophysics 235 (1994) 339-346

Concordant paleomagnetic directions from the Isthmus: Constraints on the Neogene evolution of the North American- plate boundary

Roberto S. Molina-Carza ‘, Jairne Ur~tia-Fucugauchi b, Rob Van der Voo ’

aDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New , Albuquerque, NM 87131-1116, USA b Laboratorio de Paleomagnetismo, Institute de Geofuica, UNAM, Coyoacan 04510 D.F., Mexico ‘Department of Geological Sciences, UniversiQ of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 4810%1063, USA Received 12 August, 1993; accepted 17 March 1994

Abstract

We report paleomagnetic data for Miocene igneous rocks of the southeastern Tehuantepec Isthmus , Mexico. Thermal and alternating field demagnetization reveal predominantly norma polarity magnetization, interpreted as primary TRM. The overall mean direction (Dee = 355.6”, Inc = 3&Y, k = 36.4, ag5 = 9.3”, N = 8 sites) is statistically indistinguishable from the expected direction, calculated using the North American reference pole. This result indicates that significant rotation or displacement of the Tehuantepec region relative to the craton has not occurred since 13 Ma.

1. Introduction 1979). Offshore, in the Caribbean sea, the bound- ary extends along the Cayman Trough (Holcombe Tertiary tectonics of southern Mexico and and Sharman, 1983). northern has been related to the The region has presented many long standing interactions of the Cocos (Farallon), Caribbean, problems in explaining its tectonic evolution and and North American plates (Molnar and Sykes, even its present tectonic relationships. Several 1969; Jordan, 1975; Burkart, 1983). The Cocos lines of evidence on land point to a modest plate is subducted beneath the Caribbean and (- 130 km) left-lateral offset along the Cuilco- North American plates along the Middle Amer- Chixoy-Polochic system (CCP) since about 15 Ma ica Trench (MAT, Fig. l), whereas the boundary (Burkart, 1978, 1983; Burkart et al., 1987). Move- between the Caribbean and North American ment along the Jocotan and Motagua systems is plates is a complex set of left-lateral transform less well determined. They do not have a geomor- faults. The - phic expression in the Miocene rocks that cover boundary includes the Motagua, Jocotan, and their western extension and do not produce size- Polochic systems in Honduras, , and able offset in the Quatemary volcanic arc. In adjacent Mexico (Burkart, 1978; Schwartz et al., contrast, the eastern extension of the plate

~~-1951/94/$07.00 0 1994 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved SSDlOO40-1951(94)0-0078-N AN

Gulf of Tehuantepec

Fig. I. Schematic representation of the plate tectonic arrangement of the Cocos, North America, and Caribbean plates. Open arrows represent relative motion directions. Those for northern Central America and centraf Mexico are indicative of bfock rotation Wrrutia-Fucugauchi and Biihnel, 1988; Burkart and Self, 1985). Arcuate strike-slip faults and north-south-trending grabens characterize Central Guatemala and Honduras. Central is also characterized by a major WNW-ESE depression (Central Chiapas Depression, CCHDJ. Major faults with lateral displacement are shown with solid lines (dashed where uncertain). Normal faults have tick-marks on the down-thrown block. Thrust faults are also indicated on the eastern Chiapas Laramide fold belt. Miocene volcanic provinces of southern Mexico and Central America are indicated with a dark pattern and asterisks indicate main Quatema~ volcanic centers. Enlarged area: map of the southern region showing paleomagnetic sites (1 through 9) and area1 exposure of Cenozoic volcanic and intrusive rocks. The dotted pattern inctudes undifferentiated pre-Cenozoic rocks of the Chiapas Batholith. Symbols on the map are: SC = fault; CCP = Cuilco-Chixoy-Polochic fault system; MF = system; JF = Jocotan fault system; MPF = Malpaso fault system; CT = Cayman Trough. RX ~~l~a-ea~a et al. / Tec~ono~hysics 235 (1994) 339-346 341 boundary in the Cayman Trough indicates as trapped between the North America and Carib- much as 450 km of left-lateral displacement in bean plates. In the model proposed by Burkart the Neogene (Holcombe and Sharman, 1984) and and Self (1985), the tectonic and volcanic pattern a collective Cenozoic offset of N 1,000 km in northern Central America (the Chortis Block; (Rosencrantz et al., 1988). Burkart and Self (1985) Dengo, 1969) and adjacent Chiapas (south of the postulated that internal deformation (extension CCP system) is the result of eastward rotation and terrane rotation) along the transform bound- and differential movement of crustal blocks over ary in Guatemala and Honduras can account for the subduction-controlled zone of magma pro- a substantial part of the Neogene displacement duction (Fig. 1). The model of Guzman-Speziale observed offshore. Extensional structures (e.g., et al. (1989) predicts that the extensional tectonic pull-apart basins) and se~entation of the vol- regime and block rotations of central Guatemala canic arc appear to have been active at least should extend into westernmost Chiapas. during the Neogene (Schwartz et al., 1979; In contrast to seismic activity, which yields a Burkart, 1983; Carr, 1984). Early Cenozoic move- snapshot view of stress accumulation and relief ments along the Jocotan, Motagua, and Polochic along plate boundaries, paleomagnetic data may systems are, however, controversial. provide evidence of a longer lasting stress regime. The characteristics of the subduction zone and Paleomagnetic directions can be interpreted in associated magmatic arc show a marked contrast terms of past or present tectonic regimes. Discor- across the transform boundary. The region of the dant paleomagnetic directions of Cenozoic voi- Isthmus of Tehuantepec in southern Mexico ap- canic, plutonic, and sedimentary units of the Cen- pears as a zone of transition from shallow sub- tral Mexico Volcanic Belt have been interpreted duction dip angles beneath southwestern Mexico in terms of countercl~~ise rotations of smafl to steeper angles beneath Chiapas and Central crustal blocks in response to large scale left-lateral America. The volcanic activity shows a disconti- shear (shown schematically in Fig. 1) within a nuity from the well-defined, close-to-the-margin transtensional environment (Urrutia-Fucugauchi Central American arc parallel to the MAT, to the and BShnel, 1988). Regional stress and faulting in oblique and somewhat irregularly distributed pat- the volcanic belt appear to be related to complex tern of southern Mexico (Fig. 3). plate interactions and reorganization in the Pa- The location and nature of the place where cific region (Mammerickx and Klitgord, 1982). the three plates come together is also a matter of Interestingly, paleomagnetic data for Cretaceous debate. The present plate geometry and pIate through Tertiary rocks in southern Mexico ter- velocities indicate that a theoretical triple junc- ranes (south of the Central Mexico VoIcanic Belt) tion (trench-trench transform) between North including Early Cretaceous rocks overlying the America, Cocos and Caribbean should be unsta- Chiapas Batholith, suggest stability with respect ble. Thus past plate boundary configurations are to the craton. In fact, paleomagnetic data pre- difficult to incorporate in a tectonic model for the clude major tectonic movements other than lati- region. The evolution of the triple junction is tude-parallel motion (Urrutia-Fucugauchi et al., likely responsible for the complex deformation 1987; Bohnel et al., 1988, 1989; Urrutia- pattern in this area. Although most models have Fucugauchi, 1988; Guerrero et al., 1990). Paleo- assumed that the Polochic or Motagua faults, or magnetic data for the Chortis Block are scarce, both, intersect the Middle America Trench but Late Jurassic through Eocene data clearly (Burkart, 1983), a lineation of seismicity oriented show large-magnitude rotations with respect to northwest-southeast in central Chiapas (the MaI- southern Mexico accompanied by relative south- paso fault system) has been interpreted by Guz- wards motion (Gose, 1985). The paIeomagnetic man-Speziale et al. (1989) as a significant plate data from the Chortis Block are compatible with boundary, In the model of Guzman-Speziale et models that suggest it has been adjacent to south- al. (1989), the region of western Chiapas (and west Mexico since Early Cretaceous times (Pindell offshore) is a small wedge of the Caribbean plate and Barrett, 1990). In this study we report paleomagnetic data for 2. Gehgy and sampling Late Cenozoic volcanic and plutonic units ex- posed along the Pacific coastal plain in the south- The southeastern portion of the Pacific coastal eastern portion of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec. plain in the Tehuantepec Isthmus region is char- This locality is presently northeast of the pro- acterized by Miocene volcanic, subvolcanic, and jected intersection of the MAT and the CCP fault plutonic rocks (Damon and Montesinos, 1978; system, the most northern of the left-lateral fault Burkart, 1983) which in part intrude the late systems at the North America-Caribbean bound- Paleozoic Chiapas Batholith and the Mesozoic ary. Paleomagnetic samples were obtained from sedimentary cover (Fig. 1). These units represent Late Cenozoic rocks to examine whether tectonic the ancient location of a magmatic arc that ex- rotations such as proposed for northern Central tended to the south into the Motozintla region in America or like those observed in Central Mexico the vicinity of the CCP system in Miocene times. could be detected in this region. If observed, and The present locus of the magmatic activity east of if the primary nature or otherwise origin of the the Chiapas Batholith has resulted from migra- results can be established, the amount and sense tion of the magmatic front as a consequence of of rotation should be related to Miocene or Late Miocene plate reorganization Wrrutia- younger evolution of the triple-junction or the Fucugauchi, 1987). plate boundaries. In contrast, concordant paleo- The units sampled in the present study com- magnetic direction can be interpreted to indicate prise the granodioritic intrusions exposed along tectonic stability. the Pan American highway between San Pedro

b)%Zb c)2Sa \1 I WJJP

60

SChnNm t

W$JP W&P e)6.3a 02.7a

Fig. 2. Orthogonal demagnet~atjon diagrams (Zijderveid, 1967). Full symbols (open) indicate projection onto the horizontal (vertical) plane. (a)-(c) and (0 are granodiorite samples, whereas (d) and fe) are typical examples of voicanic rocks. Temperatures are in “C and induction fields are in mT. (a) is an example of a sample carrying a reverse poiarity magnetization. R.S. ~o~~u-Gu~u et al. / Tectono~ys~ 235 (1994) 339-346 343

Tepanatepec and Arriaga (sites 2-5, 7, 8; Fig. 1) and age-equivalent dacitic flows in the Niltepec and Zanatepec area (sites 1, 6, and 9). K-Ar age determinations for the granodiorite intrusions range between 12.4 and 13 Ma (Damon and Montesinos, 1978). A total of 51 samples (9 sites) were collected in the field using a portable drill and oriented using a magnetic compass. The in- tensity of the magnetization of the material col- lected is moderate and does not influence orien- tation of drilled cores. In the laboratory one or Induction (T) two specimens 2.1 cm in length were obtained Fig. 3. Normalized isothermal remanent magnetization acqui- from each sample. sition curves for selected specimens. The great majority of the samples saturate with inductions typical of titanomagnetite. The exception to this behavior are samples from volcanic 3. Paleomagnetic results rocks sampled at site 1 which show characteristic curves of titanohematite. Natural remanent magnetization (NRM) mea- surements were made with either a ScT two axis cryogenic magnetometer or a Schonstedt spinner Experiments of isothermal remanent magneti- magnetometer in a magnetically shielded room at zation (IRM) acquisition are shown in Fig. 3. the paleomagnetic laboratory of the University of Samples nearly saturate at inductions of less than ~chigan. NRM intensities range between 2 and 0.4 T. Both the unblocking temperatures - 100 mA/m; NRM directions are well clustered served and the IRM a~uisition experiments indi- and plot on the lower hemisphere of the stere- cate that the magnetization is carried by minerals onet with northerly declinations and intermediate of the titanomagnetite (or titanomaghemite) se- inclinations. Stability of the NRM was studied by ries. Samples from site 1 do not reach saturation conventional stepwise alternating field (AF) and at 2.0 T inductions. However, the magnetization thermal demagnetization up to peak inductions unblocks at temperatures of less than 600°C. It is of 100 mT or temperatures of 620°C (respec- thus possible that the magnetization in samples tively). Typical orthogonal demagnetization dia- from site 1 is carried by titanohematites. grams (Zijderveld, 1967) are shown in Fig. 2. The Reflected light microscopy in selected granodi- majority of the samples are characterized by a orite samples indicated reiatively abundant grains, relatively simple behavior upon demagnetization. tens of microns in size, of magnetite with abun- A Iow coercivity and inte~ediate laboratory un- dant lamellae of exsolved ilmenite. Minor blocking temperature is removed at inductions of hematite was present at oxidized rims and frac- 20 mT or about 400°C. The remaining magnetiza- tures of magnetite grains. Hematite was also tion unblocks at temperatures that range between abundant in samples of site 1 and appears mag- 500 and 590°C. The high temperature component matic in origin. is in some cases stable, both in direction and intensity, up to AF peak inductions of 90 mT (Fig. 2e). More commonly this component is re- 4. Discussion moved by AF inductions of 40 to 90 mT. This magnetization is considered the characteristic Magnetization directions were calculated using magnetization (ChRM). In at least one site the the method of principal component analysis ChRM is of reverse polarity (Fig. 2a). This is (PCA) of Kirschvink (1980). Only specimens with revealed only in the AP demagnetization experi- maximum angular deviation (MAD) values of less ments of two samples thus its direction is not well than 10” were included in the site mean calcula- determined. tion, although MAD values rarely exceed 5”. Table 1 the contact with the Miocene coastal batholith Paleomagnetic data and Fischer’s statistical parameters for (Molina-Garza et al., 1992) have north-directed Late Cenozoic igneous rocks in the southeastern Tehuantepec region, Mexico and positive magnetization overprints. These overprinting magnetizations are often stable up Site Decl.(‘) Incl.(“) k ndn a95 to temperatures of 650°C and can be interpreted I* 55 358.9 37.0 229.0 5.1 as remagnetizations of thermal (or hydrothermal) 2 86 1.1 30.1 17.6 18.8 4 42 195.2 -31.1 origin associated with the Miocene intrusions 5 33 338.4 SU.2 137.0 10.6 sampled in this study. h* 5s 345.8 37.3 37.5 il.1 Paleomagnetic directions and statistical pa- 7 7s 347.7 26.6 24. I 19.1 rameters are Wed in Table 1. Sample direction x 55 13.7 39.7 13.7 2l.U distributions and site mean directions with confi- 9 * 64 340.8 34.6 64.6 11.5 dence intervals are piotted in Fig. 4. The cxcel- Mean 8 355.6 36.5 35.4 9.3 lent agreement between the results of volcanic n,, /n = number of samples demagnetized\included in the and intrusive units indicate that significant tilt of site mean. * Sites collected in volcanic rocks. the intrusives has not occurred since emplace- ment and cooling. In order to calculate a mean paleomagnetic direction representative of the Samples from site 3 do not show internal coher- Middle Miocene paleofield, site means were com- ence and will not be discussed any further. The bined using Fisher statistics assigning unit weight first component removed is interpreted as a sec- to each site. The overall mean (Dee = 355.6”. ondary magnetization of viscous origin (VRM). Inc = 36.5”, k = 36.4, uqg = 9.3”, n = 8 sites) is The high coercivity (and temperature) magnetiza- statistically indistinguishable from the expected tion is interpreted as a primary magnetization of paleomagnetic direction (359.5”, + 27”, 4 3”) cal- thermal origin (TRM). This interpretation is sup- culated using the Late Cenozoic cratonic refer- ported by the observation of both normal and ence pole of Irving and Irving (1982). This result reverse polarities. Furthermore, samples of the indicates that significant rotation or displacement late Paleozoic Chiapas Batholith collected near of the Tehuantepec region relative to the North

a)

Fig. 4. (a) Equal-area stereographjc projection of sample characteristic magnetizations calculated by principal eminent analysis after demagnetization. (b) Site means and 95% confidence circles. Directions are plotted in in-situ coordinates. A triangle indicates the expected present dipole-field direction and a diamond indicates the expected late Cenozoic direction according the Irving and Irving (1982). Squares (circles) are sites collected in volcanic (intrusive) rocks. The overall mean is indicated with a star. R.S. ~oli~a-Gur~u et al. / T~ctono~~ys~cs235 119943339-346 345

American craton has not occurred since the last tiary intrusive bodies in southwest Mexico in the 13 Ma. Xolapa Complex west of our sampling sites (Tol- This result does not directly quantify the son et al., 1993). Radiometric age determination amount of displacement associated with motion for the intrusives provide maximum ages for the along the Caribbean-North America transform mylonites and become progressively younger to plate boundary (Burkart, 1978) nor it can be used the east, towards the present location of the CCP to quantify displacement along the north-south system (Tolson et al., 1993). Mylonites cut the trending Salina Cruz fault along the Isthmus of Miocene granodiorites and Permian granites Tehuantepec (Viniegra, 1971) or the east-south- north of the town of Tonala (Fig. 1). Like the east-trending Malpaso fault on the eastern mar- Miocene rocks studied here, intrusive rocks in the gin of the Chiapas Batholith (Meneses-Rocha, Xolapa terrane give paleomagnetic results in gen- 1985). Within the statistical uncertainties, how- eral agreement with the North America reference ever, paleomagnetic data do not indicate large (Biihnel et al., 1988). It thus appears that western latitudinal translation or rotation as proposed in Chiapas and the Tehuantepec region share a plate tectonic models of the area (e.g., Ross and Cenozoic evolution which resembles that of the Scotese, 1988; Guzman-Speziale et al., 1989). continental margin of southwest Mexico (BGhnel The tectonics of Chiapas and adjacent areas is et al., 1988, 1989; Tolson et al., 1993). Rotations complicated, late Tertiary faulting is superim- related with extensional features and/or intra- posed on Laramide (early Tertiary) compres- plate deformation may thus be restricted to the sional deformation. Laramide folding and thrust- plate boundary zone between the North America ing are more intense in eastern Chiapas, whereas and Caribbean plates and nuclear Central Amer- deformation in the Tehuantepec Isthmus is rela- ica (Burkart and Self, 1985). Concordant paleo- tively mild. Unlike Central Guatemala, east-west magnetic data from this pilot study suggest that extension is not characteristic of southern Mex- the late Paleozoic Chiapas Batholith did not fol- ico. Instead, east-west-trending normal (gravity) low the Tertiary evolution of the Chortis Block. faults are present in the Central Chiapas depres- Independent stratigraphic and paleogeographic sion west of the Chiapas Batholith (Fig. 1) and evidence relate the Chiapas Batholith to the Maya further north in the Gulf region. Strike-slip fault- Block at least since Late Jurassic times (Ander- ing (left-lateral) in the Malpaso fault initiated in son and Schmidt, 1983). Cretaceous times and appears to have lasted through Oligocene times (Viniegra, 1971). Maxi- mum displacement measured along the Malpaso fault is of about 10 km (Viniegra, 1971). Motion References along the Salina Cruz fault appears to date from the late Tertiary but is poorly documented, sur- Anderson, T.H. and Schmidt,V.A., 1983. The evolution of the face indications of major faulting are lacking. In -Caribbean Sea region during Mesozoic fact, the existence of the Salina Cruz fault has time. Geol. Sot. Am. Bull., 94: 941-966. been inferred from the change in tectonic style of BBhnel, H., Negendank, J.F.W. and Urrutia-Fucugauchi, J., the Laramide fold-belt across the isthmus. 1988. Paleomagnetism and ore petrology of three Creta- The Late Cretaceous and Tertiary evolution of ceous-Tertiary batholiths of southern Mexico. N. Jb. Geol. Pallont. Monatsh., 2: 97-127. the southern Mexico continental margin have Biihnel, H., Alva-Valdivia, L., Gonzalez-Huesca, S., Urrutia- been dictated by terrane accretion (Campa and Fucugauchi, J., Moran-Zenteno, D.J., and Schaaf, P., 1989. Coney, 1983; Bijhnel et al., 1988, 1989) and conti- Paleomagnetic data and the accretion of the Guerrero nental truncation which involved southeast mo- terrane, southern Mexico continental margin. J.W. Hill- tion of the Chortis Block with respect to southern house (Editor), Deep Structure and Past Kinematics of Accreted Terranes, IUGG vol. 5. Am. Geoph~.Union, Mexico (Anderson and Schmidt, 1983; Pindell Geophys. Monogr., 50: 73-92. and Barrett, 1990). East-west-trending sub-verti- Burkart, B., 1978. Offset across the Polochic fault of cal mylonite zones with left-lateral slip cut Ter- Guatemala and Chiapas, Mexico. Geology, 6: 328-332. Burkart, B., 1983. Neogene North American-Caribbean plate province of Chiapas, Mexico. MA. Thesis, Univ. of Texas. boundary: Offset along the Polochic fault. Tectonophysics, Austin, 351 pp. 99: 251-270. Molina-Garza, R.S., Van der Voo, R. and Urrutia-Fucu- Burkart, B. and Self, S., 1985. Extension and rotation of gauchi, J., 1992. Paleomagnetism of the Chiapds Massif, crustal blocks in northern Central America and effect on southern Mexico: Evidence for rotation of the Maya Block the volcanic arc. Geology, 13: 22-26. and implication for the opening of the Gulf of Mexico. Burkart, B., Beaton, B.C., Dengo, C., and Moreno, G., 1987. Geol. Sot. Am. Bull., 104: 1156-1168. Tectonic wedges and offset Laramide structures along the Molnar, P. and Sykes, L.R., 1969, Tectonics of the Caribbean Polochic fault of Guatemala and Chiapas, Mexico: Reaf- and Middle America from focal mechanisms and firmation of large Neogene displacement. Tectonics. 6: seismicity. Geol. Sot. Am. Bull., 80: 1639-1684. 411-422. Pindell, J.L. and Barrett, SF., 1990. Geologic evolution of the Campa, M.F., and Coney, P.J., 1983. Tectonostratigraphic Caribbean region: A plate tectonic perspective. In: J.E. terranes and mineral resource distributions in Mexico. Case and G. Dengo (Editors), The Geology of North Can. J. Earth Sci., 20: 1040-1051. America, vol. I-I. Geol. Sot. Am.. Boulder, CO, pp. 405- Carr, M.J., 1984. Symmetrical and segmented variation of 432. physical and geochemical characteristics of the Central Rosencrantz, E., Ross, E. and J.G. Sclater, J.G., 1988. Depth America volcanic front. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., 20: and spreading history of the Cayman Trough as deter- 231-252. mined from depth, heat flow. and magnetic anomalies. J. Damon, P.E. and Montesinos, E., 1978. Late Cenozoic volcan- Geophys. Res., 93: 2141-2157. ism and metallogenesis over an active Benioff zone in Ross, MI., and Scotese, CR., 1988. A hierarchical tectonic Chiapas, Mexico. Ariz. Geol. Sot. Digest, 11: 155-168. model of Mexico and the Caribbean region. Tectono- Dengo. G., 1969. Problems of tectonic relation between Cen- physics, 155: 139-168. tral America and the Caribbean. Trans. Gulf Coast Assoc. Schwartz, D.P., Cuff, L.S. and T.W. Donnelly, TW.. 197’). Geol. Sot., 19: 311-320. Quaternary faulting along the Caribbean-North American Gose, W.A., 1985. Paleomagnetic results from Honduras and plate boundary in Central America. Tectonophysics. 52: their bearing on Caribbean tectonics. Tectonics. 4: 565 431-445. 585. Tolson, G., Solis-Pichardo, G., Moran, D.J., Victoria-Morales, Guerrero, J.C., Helsley C.H. and Herrero-Bervera, E., 1990. A. and Treviho, J., 1993. Naturaleza petrografica y estruc- Paleomagnetic evidence for post Jurassic stability of south- tural de las rotas cristalinas de la zona de contact0 entre eastern Mexico: Maya terrane. J. Geophys. Res., 96: 7091- 10s terrenos Xolapa y , region de Santa Maria, 7100. Oaxaca. Monogr. Union Geofisica Mexicana, 1: 327-349. Guzman-Speziale, M., Pennington, W.D. and Matumoto, T., Urrutia-Fucugauchi, J., 1987. Lateral migration of igneous 1989. The triple junction of the North America, Cocos, activity in the Chiapas magmatic arc, southern Mexico. and Caribbean plates: seismicity and tectonics. Tectonics. Litosfera, 1: 13-21. 8: 981-997. Urrutia-Fucugauchi, J., 1988. Paleomagnetic study of the Cre- Holcombe, T.L. and Sharman, G.F., 1983. Post-Miocene Cay- taceous Morelos Formation, Guerrero State, southern man Trough evolution: A speculative model. Geology, 11: Mexico. Tectonophysics, 147: 121-125. 71 I-714. Urrutia-Fucugauchi, J. and Bohnel, H., 1988. Tectonics along Irving, E. and Irving G.A., 1982. Apparent polar wander paths the Trans-Mexican volcanic belt according to paleomag- Carboniferous through Cenozoic and the assembly of netic data. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 52: 320-329. Gondwana. Geophys. Surv., 5: 141-188. Urrutia-Fucugauchi, J., Moran-Zenteno, D.J. and Cabral- Jordan, T.H., 1975. The present-day motions of the Caribbean Cano E., 1987. Paleomagnetism and tectonics of Mexico. plate. J. Geophys. Res., 80: 4433-4439. Geofis. Int., 26: 429-458. Kirschvink, J.L., 1980. The least squares line and plane and Viniegra, F.O.. 1971. Age and evolution of salt basins of analysis of paleomagnetic data. Geophys. J.R. Astron. southeastern Mexico. Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull., 55: Sot., 45: 699-718. 478-494. Mammerickx, J. and Klitgord, K.D., 1982. Northern East Zijderveld, J.D.A.. 1967. A.C. demagnetization of rocks: Pacific rise: evolution 25 my BP to present. J. Geophys. Analysis of results. In: D.W. Collinson and S.K. Runcorn Res.. 87: 6751-6759. (Editors), Methods in Paleomagnetism. Elsevier, Amster- Meneses-Rocha, J., 1985. Tectonic evolution of the strike slip dam, pp. 245-86.