DOCSLIB.ORG

The Linguistics of Endangered Languages

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE LINGUISTICS OF ENDANGERED LANGUAGES The Linguistics of Endangered Languages Contributions to Morphology and Morphosyntax W. Leo Wetzels (ed.) LOT Utrecht 2009 Published by LOT phone: +31 30 253 6006 Janskerkhof 13 fax: +31 30 253 6406 3512 JK Utrecht e-mail: [email protected] The Netherlands http://www.lotschool.nl/ Cover illustration: Ingaricó girl learning to write. Manalai village, Roraima, Brazil. Photo by Odileiz Cruz, 1999. ISBN 978-90-78328-98-8 NUR 616 © copyright 2009 by the individual authors. The Linguistics of Endangered Languages Contributions to Morphology and Morphosyntax W. Leo Wetzels (ed.) Contents Kees Hengeveld (University of Amsterdam) Preface ...................................................................................... 1 1. Leo Wetzels (Paris III, Sorbonne Nouvelle/CNRS, LPP and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) Introduction ............................................................................. 3 Part I : South America 2. Jesús Mario Girón (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) Morfología y función de las construcciones nominalizadas en wãnsöjöt (puinave) .................................................................. 15 3. Dany Mahecha Rubio(Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) El nombre en Nkak ................................................................ 63 4. Sérgio Meira (Leiden University Centre for Linguistics) and Spike Gildea (University of Oregon) Property concepts in the Cariban family: Adjectives, adverbs, and/or nouns? .......................................................................... 95 5. Eithne B. Carlin (Leiden University Centre for Linguistics) Truth and knowledge markers in Wayana (Cariban), Suriname ............................................................................... 135 6. Francesc Queixalós (CELIA/CNRS Paris) La posture du corps dans la classification et la localisation: l’exemple du sikuani ............................................................ 151 7. Willem Adelaar (Leiden University Centre for Linguistics) Inverse markers in Andean languages: A comparative view ....................................................................................... 171 Part II : Africa 8. Mulugeta Seyoum (Ethiopian Languages Research Centre and Leiden University Centre for Linguistics) Negation in Dime .................................................................. 189 9. Azeb Amha (Leiden University Centre for Linguistics) The morphosyntax of negation in Zargulla ........................... 199 10. Anne-Christie Hellenthal (Leiden University Centre for Linguistics) Possession in Sheko .............................................................. 221 11. Kofi Dorvlo (Language Centre, University of Ghana) Noun class system and agreement patterns in Logba (Ikpana) ...................................................................... 243 12. Mercy Lamptey Bobuafor (Leiden University Centre of Linguistics) Noun classes in Tafi: A preliminary analysis ....................... 267 Part III : Middle East and East-Timor 13. Masayoshi Shibatani (Rice University) and Khaled Awadh Bin Makhashen (Hadhramout University and Universiti Sains, Malaysia) Nominalization in Soqotri, a South Arabian language of Yemen ................................................................................... 311 14. Aone van Engelenhoven (Leiden University Centre of Linguistics) On derivational processes in Fataluku, a non-Austronesian language in East-Timor ......................................................... 333 Index ............................................................................................... 363 Preface Kees Hengeveld (Amsterdam Center for Language and Communica- tion, University of Amsterdam) At the recommendation of an advisory committee consisting of Tjeerd de Graaf, Silvia Kouwenberg, Maarten Mous, Pieter Muysken and Leo Wetzels, the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) started a research programme in 2002 that aimed at encouraging research on endangered languages and at disseminating the results of that research among the peoples concerned, the general public, and the academic com- munity. The Endangered Languages Programme (ELP) implemented the first aim by funding seven projects on languages and language groups from Africa, Asia, and South America. The board of the programme, consisting of Kees Hengeveld (chair from 2005), Rosalyn Howard, Ul- rike Mosel, Stephane Robert, and Rieks Smeets (chair until 2005), and guided and assisted first by Frank Zuijdam and later by Marc Linssen from NWO, selected these projects from a large number of proposals of high quality, which made clear that there is a great interest and an enor- mous potential for language documentation among Dutch linguists and the colleagues with which they collaborate internationally. This was rea- son for NWO to ask Maarten Mous, participating in the ELP, to take the initiative for a European programme on endangered languages. Such a programme was indeed approved by the European Science Foundation, and has now started under the name EUROBABEL. Within each of the ELP projects attention was paid to the docu- mentation needs of the peoples concerned, such as the production of teaching materials, dictionaries, and audiovisual materials registering daily life and culture. The general public was informed about language endangerment through cultural events for the interested laymen, and through the development of a multimedia course on language endanger- ment for use in secondary schools. This course was developed by Gotze Kalsbeek and Cecilia Odé and is freely available in Brazilian Portuguese, Dutch, English, and Russian at the website www.endangeredlanguages. nl. The academic community was kept informed during the programme through a series of conferences, organized by NWO in collaboration with 2 KEES HENGEVELD Leo Wetzels at VU University Amsterdam in 2004, Kees Hengeveld at the University of Amsterdam in 2007, and Maarten Mous at the Univer- sity of Leiden in 2010. This book too is meant to inform the academic community about the results of the programme. It testifies to the enor- mous richness of human languages in general, and to the need to pre- serve and document this richness in particular. It samples highlights of the grammars of the languages studied, which are described in full in the language descriptions coming out of the individual projects, which are listed as they appear at the programme’s page at NWO’s website www. nwo.nl. The board of the ELP would like to thank W. Leo Wetzels for tak- ing it upon him to act as the editor of this volume; Katherine Demuth, Pattie Epps, Francesc Queixalós, Anne Schwarz, Miriam van Staden, Hein Steinhauer, Mauro Tosco, and Johan van der Auwera for acting as reviewers; and Jeroen van de Weijer for correcting the English contribu- tions and for preparing the manuscript for publication. Introduction W. Leo Wetzels (Paris III, Sorbonne Nouvelle/CNRS, LPP and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) The articles in this volume originate from two sources. The manuscripts by Sérgio Meira & Spike Gildea, Francesc Queixalós, Masayoshi Shi- batani & Khaled Awadh Bin Makhashen, and Willem Adelaar were se- lected by the editor. All others were written by researchers engaged in the Endangered Languages Programme financed by the Netherlands Or- ganization for Scientific Research. The papers are organised according to the geographical distribution of the languages discussed, resulting in the following division, respectively: South America (Colombia, Suriname, Brazil and the Andes), Africa (Ethiopia, Ghana), and Asia (Yemen, East- Timor). South America The language called Wãnsöjöt Yedókjet, more often referred to as Pui- nave, is spoken by some 5000 individuals. These people are divided into two communities, one of which lives in the region of the Inírida River in Colombia, and the other, a smaller group, resides on the shores of the Venezuelan Orinoco. Wãnsöjöt has sometimes been classified as belong- ing to the Makú-Puinave linguistic family, together with the Colombian languages Nikak, Kakua, and the eastern (mainly Brazilian) Maku lan- guages. However, there is a lack of strong evidence for a genetic rela- tionship between Wãnsöjöt and any of these languages. Therefore, it must be considered a linguistic isolate for the time being. Although the Wãnsöjöt represent a relatively numerous group, the number of speakers who master the traditional language is rapidly decreasing, mainly be- cause over half of the population now live in urban areas and many chil- dren and adolescents opt for Spanish. In the article “Morfología y fun- ción de las construcciones nominalizadas en wãnsöjöt (puinave)”, Jesús Mario Girón discusses the question of nominalization in Wãnsöjöt, which has nominalized structures that function either as predicates or as participants. Deverbal nominalizations create agentive or objective nouns. In addition, action nominals and locative nominalizations may be 4 W. LEO WETZELS derived from verbs, which serve as oblique arguments. Nominalization is not limited to the lexicon; syntactic constituents may also be nominal- ized. Extended incomplete clauses and clauses that suffix the resultative -pn or the nominal past -hin function as subordinate and coordinate clauses. Furthermore, the conditional construction is formed by the addi- tion of the locative case marker -u to the initial clause (protasis) of the conditional, whereas the past nominal hin, suffixed to one of two clauses in a sequence, creates adversative complex sentences. The Wãnsöjöt
Recommended publications
  • A First Comparison of Pronominal and Demonstrative Systems in the Cariban Language Family*

    A First Comparison of Pronominal and Demonstrative Systems in the Cariban Language Family*

    A FIRST COMPARISON OF PRONOMINAL AND DEMONSTRATIVE SYSTEMS IN THE CARIBAN LANGUAGE FAMILY* Sérgio Meira Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands 1. Introduction The Cariban language family is composed of approximately 25 languages (numbers ranging from 20 to 50, depending on different researchers’ opinions about which varieties are dialects and which are independent languages), spoken by approximately 100,000 people in lowland South America, from south-eastern Colombia (where Karihona is spoken) to the Oiapoque river in Brazil (Karinya), from the coast of the Guianas (Karinya) down to the southern Xingu area in central Brazil (Bakairí). The field of comparative Cariban studies was initiated more than two hundred years ago, when the relationship between a number of Cariban languages was first noticed by Filippo Salvadore Gilij (1782). Unfortunately, the historical-comparative method has been only very rarely applied to Cariban languages, for two main reasons: (1) most of the languages are, to this day, poorly known, which means that there is very little reliable material to compare; (2) most people who compared Cariban languages were not trained comparativists. Girard (1971) remains the only methodical attempt at reconstructing Proto-Cariban lexical items and proposing a classification (unfortunately based on a still very poor data base). In the area of morphosyntax, Gildea (1998) presents the first reconstruction of the person-marking http://www.etnolinguistica.org/illa and tense-aspect-mood (TAM) systems of Proto-Cariban and their syntactic properties. This file is freely available for download at The present work attempts to contribute to the development of historical studies in the Cariban family by presenting a first preliminary reconstruction of the pronominal system of Proto-Cariban (including non-third-person and third-person, i.e.
  • SCHAPPER, Antoinette and Emilie WELLFELT. 2018. 'Reconstructing

    SCHAPPER, Antoinette and Emilie WELLFELT. 2018. 'Reconstructing

    Reconstructing contact between Alor and Timor: Evidence from language and beyond a b Antoinette SCHAPPER and Emilie WELLFELT LACITO-CNRSa, University of Colognea, and Stockholm Universityb Despite being separated by a short sea-crossing, the neighbouring islands of Alor and Timor in south-eastern Wallacea have to date been treated as separate units of linguistic analysis and possible linguistic influence between them is yet to be investigated. Historical sources and oral traditions bear witness to the fact that the communities from both islands have been engaged with one another for a long time. This paper brings together evidence of various types including song, place names and lexemes to present the first account of the interactions between Timor and Alor. We show that the groups of southern and eastern Alor have had long-standing connections with those of north-central Timor, whose importance has generally been overlooked by historical and linguistic studies. 1. Introduction1 Alor and Timor are situated at the south-eastern corner of Wallacea in today’s Indonesia. Alor is a small mountainous island lying just 60 kilometres to the north of the equally mountainous but much larger island of Timor. Both Alor and Timor are home to a mix of over 50 distinct Papuan and Austronesian language-speaking peoples. The Papuan languages belong to the Timor-Alor-Pantar (TAP) family (Schapper et al. 2014). Austronesian languages have been spoken alongside the TAP languages for millennia, following the expansion of speakers of the Austronesian languages out of Taiwan some 3,000 years ago (Blust 1995). The long history of speakers of Austronesian and Papuan languages in the Timor region is a topic in need of systematic research.
  • Fieldwork and Linguistic Analysis in Indigenous Languages of the Americas

    Fieldwork and Linguistic Analysis in Indigenous Languages of the Americas

    Fieldwork and Linguistic Analysis in Indigenous Languages of the Americas edited by Andrea L. Berez, Jean Mulder, and Daisy Rosenblum Language Documentation & Conservation Special Publication No. 2 Published as a sPecial Publication of language documentation & conservation language documentation & conservation Department of Linguistics, UHM Moore Hall 569 1890 East-West Road Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96822 USA http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/ldc university of hawai‘i Press 2840 Kolowalu Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96822-1888 USA © All texts and images are copyright to the respective authors. 2010 All chapters are licensed under Creative Commons Licenses Cover design by Cameron Chrichton Cover photograph of salmon drying racks near Lime Village, Alaska, by Andrea L. Berez Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication data ISBN 978-0-8248-3530-9 http://hdl.handle.net/10125/4463 Contents Foreword iii Marianne Mithun Contributors v Acknowledgments viii 1. Introduction: The Boasian tradition and contemporary practice 1 in linguistic fieldwork in the Americas Daisy Rosenblum and Andrea L. Berez 2. Sociopragmatic influences on the development and use of the 9 discourse marker vet in Ixil Maya Jule Gómez de García, Melissa Axelrod, and María Luz García 3. Classifying clitics in Sm’algyax: 33 Approaching theory from the field Jean Mulder and Holly Sellers 4. Noun class and number in Kiowa-Tanoan: Comparative-historical 57 research and respecting speakers’ rights in fieldwork Logan Sutton 5. The story of *o in the Cariban family 91 Spike Gildea, B.J. Hoff, and Sérgio Meira 6. Multiple functions, multiple techniques: 125 The role of methodology in a study of Zapotec determiners Donna Fenton 7.
  • PDF Hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

    PDF Hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/42006 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2017-12-06 and may be subject to change. Kwaza in a Comparative Perspective Author(s): Hein van der Voort Reviewed work(s): Source: International Journal of American Linguistics, Vol. 71, No. 4 (October 2005), pp. 365- 412 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/501245 . Accessed: 13/07/2012 09:37 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to International Journal of American Linguistics. http://www.jstor.org KWAZA IN A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE1 Hein van der Voort Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi In view of the previous sparsity of data, the existing claims with regard to a genea- logical classification of the Aikanã, Kanoê, and Kwaza languages of Rondônia, on the Brazilian side of the Guaporé River, are premature and unconvincing.
  • Browsing Through Bias: the Library of Congress Classification and Subject Headings for African American Studies and LGBTQIA Studies

    Browsing Through Bias: the Library of Congress Classification and Subject Headings for African American Studies and LGBTQIA Studies

    Browsing through Bias: The Library of Congress Classification and Subject Headings for African American Studies and LGBTQIA Studies Sara A. Howard and Steven A. Knowlton Abstract The knowledge organization system prepared by the Library of Con- gress (LC) and widely used in academic libraries has some disadvan- tages for researchers in the fields of African American studies and LGBTQIA studies. The interdisciplinary nature of those fields means that browsing in stacks or shelflists organized by LC Classification requires looking in numerous locations. As well, persistent bias in the language used for subject headings, as well as the hierarchy of clas- sification for books in these fields, continues to “other” the peoples and topics that populate these titles. This paper offers tools to help researchers have a holistic view of applicable titles across library shelves and hopes to become part of a larger conversation regarding social responsibility and diversity in the library community.1 Introduction The neat division of knowledge into tidy silos of scholarly disciplines, each with its own section of a knowledge organization system (KOS), has long characterized the efforts of libraries to arrange their collections of books. The KOS most commonly used in American academic libraries is the Li- brary of Congress Classification (LCC). LCC, developed between 1899 and 1903 by James C. M. Hanson and Charles Martel, is based on the work of Charles Ammi Cutter. Cutter devised his “Expansive Classification” to em- body the universe of human knowledge within twenty-seven classes, while Hanson and Martel eventually settled on twenty (Chan 1999, 6–12). Those classes tend to mirror the names of academic departments then prevail- ing in colleges and universities (e.g., Philosophy, History, Medicine, and Agriculture).
  • French Creole

    French Creole

    Comparative perspectives on the origins, development and structure of Amazonian (Karipúna) French Creole Jo-Anne S. Ferreira UWI, St. Augustine/SIL International Mervyn C. Alleyne UWI, Mona/UPR, Río Piedras Together known as Kheuól, Karipúna French Creole (KFC) and Galibi-Marwono French Creole (GMFC) are two varieties of Amazonian French Creole (AFC) spoken in the Uaçá area of northern Amapá in Brazil. Th ey are socio-historically and linguistically connected with and considered to be varieties of Guianese French Creole (GFC). Th is paper focuses on the external history of the Brazilian varieties, and compares a selection of linguistic forms across AFC with those of GFC and Antillean varieties, including nasalised vowels, the personal pronouns and the verbal markers. St. Lucian was chosen as representative of the Antillean French creoles of the South-Eastern Caribbean, including Martinique and Trinidad, whose populations have had a history of contact with those of northern Brazil since the sixteenth century. Data have been collected from both fi eld research and archival research into secondary sources. Introduction Th is study focuses on a group of languages/dialects which are spoken in Brazil, French Guiana and the Lesser Antilles, and to a lesser extent on others spoken in other parts of the Americas (as well as in the Indian Ocean). Th is linguistic group is variously referred to as Creole French, French Creole, French-lexicon Creole, French-lexifi er Creole, French Creole languages/dialects, Haitian/Martiniquan/St. Lucian (etc.) Cre- ole, and more recently by the adjective of the name of the country, particularly in the case of the Haiti (cf.
  • Current Studies on South American Languages, [Indigenous Languages of Latin America (ILLA), Vol

    Current Studies on South American Languages, [Indigenous Languages of Latin America (ILLA), Vol

    This file is freely available for download at http://www.etnolinguistica.org/illa This book is freely available for download at http://www.etnolinguistica.org/illa References: Crevels, Mily, Simon van de Kerke, Sérgio Meira & Hein van der Voort (eds.). 2002. Current Studies on South American Languages, [Indigenous Languages of Latin America (ILLA), vol. 3], [CNWS publications, vol. 114], Leiden: Research School of Asian, African, and Amerindian Studies (CNWS), vi + 344 pp. (ISBN 90-5789-076-3) CURRENT STUDIES ON SOUTH AMERICAN LANGUAGES INDIGENOUS LANGUAGES OF LATIN AMERICA (ILLA) This series, entitled Indigenous Languages of Latin America, is a result of the collaboration between the CNWS research group of Amerindian Studies and the Spinoza research program Lexicon and Syntax, and it will function as an outlet for publications related to the research program. LENGUAS INDÍGENAS DE AMÉRICA LATINA (ILLA) La serie Lenguas Indígenas de América Latina es el resultado de la colabora- ción entre el equipo de investigación CNWS de estudios americanos y el programa de investigación Spinoza denominado Léxico y Sintaxis. Dicha serie tiene como objetivo publicar los trabajos que se lleven a cabo dentro de ambos programas de investigación. Board of advisors / Consejo asesor: Willem Adelaar (Universiteit Leiden) Eithne Carlin (Universiteit Leiden) Pieter Muysken (Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen) Leo Wetzels (Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam) Series editors / Editores de la serie: Mily Crevels (Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen) Simon van de Kerke (Universiteit
  • Universidade De Brasília Instituto De Letras Departamento De Linguística, Português E Línguas Clássicas Programa De Pós-Graduação Em Linguística

    Universidade De Brasília Instituto De Letras Departamento De Linguística, Português E Línguas Clássicas Programa De Pós-Graduação Em Linguística

    UNIVERSIDADE DE BRASÍLIA INSTITUTO DE LETRAS DEPARTAMENTO DE LINGUÍSTICA, PORTUGUÊS E LÍNGUAS CLÁSSICAS PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM LINGUÍSTICA ASPECTOS GRAMATICAIS DA LÍNGUA MAKASAE DE TIMOR-LESTE: FONOLOGIA, MORFOLOGIA E SINTAXE Jessé Silveira Fogaça Brasília 2015 UNIVERSIDADE DE BRASÍLIA INSTITUTO DE LETRAS DEPARTAMENTO DE LINGUÍSTICA, PORTUGUÊS E LÍNGUAS CLÁSSICAS PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM LINGUÍSTICA ASPECTOS GRAMATICAIS DA LÍNGUA MAKASAE DE TIMOR-LESTE: FONOLOGIA, MORFOLOGIA E SINTAXE Jessé Silveira Fogaça Tese apresentada ao Departamento de Linguística, Português e Línguas Clássicas da Universidade de Brasília, como parte dos requisitos para a obtenção do grau de Doutor em Linguística. Orientador: Profº. Dr. Hildo Honório do Couto Brasília - DF 2015 Jessé Silveira Fogaça ASPECTOS GRAMATICAIS DA LÍNGUA MAKASAE DE TIMOR-LESTE: Fonologia, Morfologia e Sintaxe Tese apresentada ao Departamento de Linguística, Português e Línguas Clássicas da Universidade de Brasília, como parte dos requisitos para a obtenção do grau de Doutor em Linguística. Brasília, 17 de novembro de 2015. Banca Examinadora: Prof. Dr. Hildo Honório do Couto (UnB/presidente) Profa. Dra. Kênia Mara de Freitas Siqueira – Membro (PMEL/UFG/Catalão) Profa. Dra. Elza Kioko Nakayama Nenoki do Couto – Membro (FL/UFG) Profa. Dra. Walquíria Neiva Praça – Membro (UnB/PPGL) Profa. Dra. Orlene Lúcia de Sabóia Carvalho – Membro (UnB/PPGL) Profa. Dra. Ulisdete Rodrigues de Souza – Membro suplente RESUMO A presente tese aborda aspectos da gramática da língua Makasae de Timor-Leste, mais precisamente sua fonologia, morfossintaxe e sintaxe. No primeiro capítulo é apresentado as aspectos teóricos e metodológicos que nortearam a produção desta pesquisa, bem como o procedimento de coleta de dados e pesquisa de campo.
  • Selln~If Chern Llirooro Supcorvisor; Dinyam Sisily

    Selln~If Chern Llirooro Supcorvisor; Dinyam Sisily

    nOClJMENTATION AND GRAMMATICAL DESCRIPTION OF GOFA Ily: Selln~if Chern llirooro Supcorvisor; Dinyam SiSilY (phD) A Dis~rlation Submlned 10 the Sfhool or Graduate StudiH. College of Humanities. Language Stndin. Jonrnalism and Philology l:kplrlmenl of Linguistics Ind Philology l'rHtnted in .·ulfillmenl$ of tbt Rtquirtments for the Dtgru of ~Ior of Philosophy in Documentary Linguisliell and Culture Addis Ababa Uohuslty June 20lS ... <Ioth. ,' .... b. I 61. • .,11) TN" ", ..rur, ,....... d ............ ~<".,t<I.,. S.lluol<l_ .... ~ .... ~I"-' o....n..""al '¥'n,.... oro.r. ..bmo"""", obr ~ or l,.p""'" ~ I'bilolup-;. ,..,...1 ru.foI_ 0("" r T •• '".1«""'0.,...",0......011'101-..101. Do<-, , ...._.""'~, ..1 '11 ..........., ... ' __ 011 .......-..1...,_ ............. • 1 ..... _ .... S I,'Y""''''''' • I. \Ilc "rl(ic"ign«l, d«lare \hal \hi. Ji~nmi<)n hcreb) SUOOllUOO for 1M dt8/ff nf Philooopby In Doc"""1IIaI) Lln~Ut$IIC' and Culture at Add;$ AhabII Uni"''fSlly il my ""n "O<k lind lias fI()\ brm P"" iousl) MibnIll\C'd 10 an) otlla llni'..nil) for any Ik~ To It.. but of m) ~""" IMgt. ;1 COIIt.;nRS "" "",":rIal pKnoosly published or ... nutn by anulh<-r pofJQn. "''';~pI ,,110,.., d"" refc,..,,..~ II.u been rna..k in 1110 \e<1 NarrIO oflllO cMclidatc: Sdlassic Chef\! 'Q\L 0+ ,. 201b • Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................................... VII LIST OF MAPS AND FIGURE .........................................................................................................................IX
  • The Story of *Ô in the Cariban Family1, °

    The Story of *Ô in the Cariban Family1, °

    Language Documentation & Conservation Special Publication No. 2 (May 2010): Fieldwork and Linguistic Analysis in Indigenous Languages of the Americas, ed. by Andrea L. Berez, Jean Mulder, and Daisy Rosenblum, pp. 91-123 http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/ldc/ 5 http://hdl.handle.net/10125/4452 The Story of *ô in the Cariban Family1, ° Spike Gildeaa, B. J. Hoffb, and Sérgio Meirac aUniversity of Oregon bLeiden University cKoninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen/Leiden University This paper argues for the reconstruction of an unrounded mid central/back vowel *ô to Proto-Cariban. Recent comparative studies of the Cariban family encounter a consistent correspondence of ə : o : ɨ : e, tentatively reconstructed as *o2 (considering only pronouns; Meira 2002) and *ô (considering only seven languages; Meira & Franchetto 2005). The first empirical contribution of this paper is to expand the comparative database to twenty- one modern and two extinct Cariban languages, where the robustness of the correspond- ence is confirmed. In ten languages, *ô merges with another vowel, either *o or *ɨ. The second empirical contribution of this paper is to more closely analyze one apparent case of attested change from *ô > o, as seen in cognate forms from Island Carib and dialectal variation in Kari’nja (Carib of Surinam). Kari’nja words borrowed into Island Carib/Garí- funa show a split between rounded and unrounded back vowels: rounded back vowels are reflexes of *o and *u, unrounded back vowels reflexes of *ô and *ɨ. Our analysis of Island Carib phonology was originally developed by Douglas Taylor in the 1960s, supplemented with unpublished Garifuna data collected by Taylor in the 1950s.
  • Similative Morphemes As Purpose Clause Markers in Ethiopia and Beyond Yvonne Treis

    Similative Morphemes As Purpose Clause Markers in Ethiopia and Beyond Yvonne Treis

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Archive Ouverte a LUniversite Lyon 2 Similative morphemes as purpose clause markers in Ethiopia and beyond Yvonne Treis To cite this version: Yvonne Treis. Similative morphemes as purpose clause markers in Ethiopia and beyond. 2016. <hal-01351924> HAL Id: hal-01351924 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01351924 Submitted on 4 Aug 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destin´eeau d´ep^otet `ala diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publi´esou non, lished or not. The documents may come from ´emanant des ´etablissements d'enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche fran¸caisou ´etrangers,des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou priv´es. Similative morphemes as purpose clause markers in Ethiopia and beyond Yvonne Treis LLACAN (CNRS, INALCO, Université Sorbonne Paris-Cité) Abstract In more than 30 languages spoken at the Horn of Africa, a similative morpheme ‘like’ or a noun ‘manner’ or ‘type’ is used as a marker of purpose clauses. The paper first elaborates on the many functions of the enclitic morpheme =g ‘manner’ in Kambaata (Highland East Cushitic), which is used, among others, as a marker of the standard in similative and equative comparison (‘like’, ‘as’), of temporal clauses of immediate anteriority (‘as soon as’), of complement clauses (‘that’) and, most notably, of purpose clauses (‘in order to’).
  • Historical Linguistics and the Comparative Study of African Languages

    Historical Linguistics and the Comparative Study of African Languages

    Historical Linguistics and the Comparative Study of African Languages UNCORRECTED PROOFS © JOHN BENJAMINS PUBLISHING COMPANY 1st proofs UNCORRECTED PROOFS © JOHN BENJAMINS PUBLISHING COMPANY 1st proofs Historical Linguistics and the Comparative Study of African Languages Gerrit J. Dimmendaal University of Cologne John Benjamins Publishing Company Amsterdam / Philadelphia UNCORRECTED PROOFS © JOHN BENJAMINS PUBLISHING COMPANY 1st proofs TM The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American 8 National Standard for Information Sciences — Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Dimmendaal, Gerrit Jan. Historical linguistics and the comparative study of African languages / Gerrit J. Dimmendaal. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. African languages--Grammar, Comparative. 2. Historical linguistics. I. Title. PL8008.D56 2011 496--dc22 2011002759 isbn 978 90 272 1178 1 (Hb; alk. paper) isbn 978 90 272 1179 8 (Pb; alk. paper) isbn 978 90 272 8722 9 (Eb) © 2011 – John Benjamins B.V. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, by print, photoprint, microfilm, or any other means, without written permission from the publisher. John Benjamins Publishing Company • P.O. Box 36224 • 1020 me Amsterdam • The Netherlands John Benjamins North America • P.O. Box 27519 • Philadelphia PA 19118-0519 • USA UNCORRECTED PROOFS © JOHN BENJAMINS PUBLISHING COMPANY 1st proofs Table of contents Preface ix Figures xiii Maps xv Tables