Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Andrea S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Andrea S Social Studies and the Young Learner 31 (3) pp. 29–32 ©2019 National Council for the Social Studies Book Review A Different Kind of Superhero: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Andrea S. Libresco Ruth Bader Ginsburg: The Case of R. B. G. vs. Inequality by and well-written. The use of a variety of phrases in I Dissent Jonah Winter; illustrated by Stacy Innerst (New York: Abrams used to describe Ginsburg’s disagreement with societal norms Books for Young Readers, 2018) (48 pp.) (e.g., “dissent,” “did not concur,” “disagreed”) shows students both the power of dissent to make change and the power of I Dissent: Ruth Bader Ginsburg Makes Her Mark by Debbie diverse language to tell an engaging story. As its title suggests, Levy; illustrated by Elizabeth Baddeley (New York: Simon & The Case of R. B. G vs. Inequality presents a narrative as would Schuster/S&S Books for Young Readers, 2017) (40 pp.) a lawyer arguing a case in court, which is a winning format that provides students with a creative model of narrative nonfiction. The last few decades have seen the publication of many It is also worth mentioning that The Case of R. B. G. vs. biographies of brave girls and women. There are books about Inequality was named a New York Times/New York Public girls going to jail for civil rights; and young women striking for Library Best Illustrated Children’s Book of 2017. The beauti- better wages and working conditions, flying planes solo across ful inside cover illustrations reinforce the importance of the the ocean, working as investigative journalists, casting illegal quiet, steady work of the acquisition of knowledge: hundreds votes, initiating hunger strikes in jail, writing about lynching of books line a wall of shelves and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, on a at great personal cost, and many others.1 Read cumulatively, ladder, in her judicial robe and collar, reaches for one of them; these biographies might suggest that most women who make on the title page, she is a young girl, reading a book. a difference must engage in some sort of extra-legal action or brave some sort of physical danger. It is rather unusual, then, The Personal and Professional are Political to read about a woman who has had, and, at age 85 continues From its opening line, “Ladies and gentlemen of the jury…,” to have, a profound impact on American society, not with one R. B. G. cleverly builds a case about the future justice’s lifelong or two memorable acts, but through hard work and use of her fight against inequality. Presented, first, is evidence of inequality intellect, day after day, and night after night—sometimes staying about the world into which Ginsburg was born, and not only up until 4:00 am to finish her reading and writing. Thus, the evidence about women’s inequality (a father who felt that “a two accounts of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, published in the last woman’s place was in the home”), but discrimination against two years and named as Notable Social Studies Trade Books Jews, as well. To escape religious persecution, Ginsburg’s par- for Young Readers, are welcome additions to biography shelves ents fled Europe in the 1930s, and their daughter experienced in school classrooms and libraries. discrimination firsthand when she saw a sign outside a resort in Both books reviewed here, Ruth Bader Ginsburg: The Case Pennsylvania, warning, “No Dogs or Jews allowed.” The author of R. B. G. vs. Inequality and I Dissent: Ruth Bader Ginsburg underscores that persecution was not confined to Europe: “This Makes Her Mark, are inspirational. They tell a story that happened right here in America.” is both typical and exceptional–the striving of the children Ginsburg’s mother, whose own educational aspirations had of immigrants and their conviction that the law could be an been thwarted, as she had to work so that her brother could instrument of societal change. While they cover some of the attend college, became the driving force behind her daugh- same ground—both books highlight the influence of Ginsburg’s ter’s educational achievement. Sadly, neither Ginsburg nor mother and her emphasis on books, the library, and educa- her mother attended her high school graduation, where she tion—the two biographies emphasize different aspects of and was sixth in a class of 700, as her mother died that day, at the details about Ginsburg’s family and professional life. The read- end of a four-year bout with cancer. One could well imagine ing level of The Case of R. B. G. vs. Inequality is more appro- Ginsburg’s educational journey ending at that point, without priate for upper elementary students, while I Dissent can be her encourager-in-chief. However, the author narrates, “There handled by primary students, as well. Both works are engaging was only one thing for Ruth to do.” She heads for Cornell, January/February 2019 29 where her mother’s brother had gone–and where her own Even having a husband in her corner, the barriers to a woman mother would have gone, had she been encouraged as a young pursuing a career in law were formidable; The Case of R. B. G. woman. This theme is picked up again later in the book, when vs. Inequality uses “exhibits” to make this point in the text and Ginsburg honors her mother as she accepts her appointment accompanying illustrations: to the Supreme Court: “I pray that I may be all that she would have been had she lived in an age when women could aspire A. At her first job after college, Ginsburg’s boss demoted her and achieve, and daughters are cherished as much as sons.” and slashed her wages when he found out she was pregnant. Cornell University in 1950 had a 4:1 ratio of men to women students (today it is about 1:1). The author is forthright about B. She was one of nine women in a class of 500 at Harvard the paradox for women at Cornell: they had to be very smart Law School, which did not provide housing for female to get in, yet pretend not to be smart to get a date; a pointed students. (I was reminded of the House of Representatives’ illustration depicts Ginsburg hiding out in the bathroom to failure to provide bathrooms for women near the floor until study, one of many visuals that complement the text artfully. 2011.)3 This paradox notwithstanding, “She was always listening, always thinking, always learning.” (As both college professor C. She was barred from entering the periodical room of the and parent, I cannot think of a better approach to college or a Harvard law library because she was a woman. better message for elementary students.) At Cornell, she also met her future husband, Martin D. In most of her law classes, there was only one woman, who Ginsburg, from whom she did not have to hide her intellect, would be called on as a joke–notwithstanding that the as he was the first man who “liked that she had a brain.” That women were hyper-prepared and almost always answered this is the second-to-last mention of Marty Ginsburg is a shame. correctly. One could argue, as Ginsburg, herself, has, that Marty’s ahead- of-his-time attitude toward women, including his commitment E. Famously, the Dean at Harvard asked each female student to domestic egalitarianism (most notably, as the cook in the why she thought she deserved a spot in the school that family), positioned her to have a wildly successful career in could have gone to a man. Ginsburg’s answer, “To better law, even as she was a wife and mother. Half a century later, understand the work of my husband.” This reply turned Sheryl Sandberg admitted that Ruth Bader’s excellent choice out to be ironic because, without Ginsburg’s help, her of spouse was the most important factor that made it possible husband wouldn’t have graduated, as he became gravely ill for her to “lean in.”2 and was unable to attend classes. She went in his stead, took 30 Social Studies and the Young Learner notes for him, cared for him, took care of their newborn, up, because she refused to let other people define her limita- went to her own classes, and was an editor of Harvard tions as a person, Ruth Bader Ginsburg has herself become a Law Review. (Just reading that last sentence is exhausting!) symbol of justice in America.” Happily, her husband recovered, graduated, and got a job The extensive Glossary and Author’s Note fill in more of the in New York, so Ginsburg transferred to Columbia, where context, including that Ginsburg was one of a record-breaking she graduated, tied for first in her class. 40 female appointments to the federal bench made by President Jimmy Carter. When he took office in 1977, only one of the 97 F. After she graduated, no law firms would hire her–she federal judges was a woman. The end material also mentions had the “triple whammy” of being a woman, a Jew, and the names of cases that produced Ginsburg’s strongest dis- a mother–so Ginsburg secured jobs as a law clerk and, sents and provides details of her dissenting opinion in Citizens then, a law professor. (My own mother graduated from United vs. Federal Elections Commission. The Author’s Note Columbia Law School in 1948, one of three women in her concludes with the Justice’s response, when questioned as to class, and she, too, could not get hired by any firm other how many women on the Supreme Court would be enough: than her father’s.) “When there are nine.” G.
Recommended publications
  • The Evolution of the Image of the First Lady
    The Evolution of the Image of the First Lady Reagan N. Griggs Dr. Rauhaus University of North Georgia The role of the First Lady of the United States of America has often been seen as symbolic, figurative, and trivial. Often in comparison to her husband, she is seen as a minimal part of the world stage and ultimately of the history books. Through this research, I seek to debunk the theory that the First Lady is just an allegorical figure of our country, specifically through the analysis of the twenty- first century first ladies. I wish to pursue the evolution of the image of the First Lady and her relevance to political change and public policies. Because a woman has yet to be president of the United States, the First Lady is arguably the only female political figure to live in the White House thus far. The evolution of the First Lady is relevant to gender studies due to its pertinence to answering the age old question of women’s place in politics. Every first lady has in one way or another, exerted some type of influence on the position and on the man to whom she was married to. The occupants of the White House share a unique partnership, with some of the first ladies choosing to influence the president quietly or concentrating on the hostess role. While other first ladies are seen as independent spokeswomen for their own causes of choice, as openly influencing the president, as well as making their views publicly known (Carlin, 2004, p. 281-282).
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons Learned from Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
    LESSONS LEARNED FROM JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG Amanda L. Tyler* INTRODUCTION Serving as a law clerk for Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in the Supreme Court’s October Term 1999 was one of the single greatest privileges and honors of my life. As a trailblazer who opened up opportunities for women, she was a personal hero. How many people get to say that they worked for their hero? Justice Ginsburg was defined by her brilliance, her dedication to public service, her resilience, and her unwavering devotion to taking up the Founders’ calling, set out in the Preamble to our Constitution, to make ours a “more perfect Union.”1 She was a profoundly dedicated public servant in no small measure because she appreciated just how important her role was in ensuring that our Constitution belongs to everyone. Whether as an advocate or a Justice, she tirelessly fought to dismantle discrimination and more generally to open opportunities for every person to live up to their full human potential. Without question, she left this world a better place than she found it, and we are all the beneficiaries. As an advocate, Ruth Bader Ginsburg challenged our society to liber- ate all persons from the gender-based stereotypes that held them back. As a federal judge for forty years—twenty-seven of them on the Supreme Court—she continued and expanded upon that work, even when it meant in dissent calling out her colleagues for improperly walking back earlier gains or halting future progress.2 In total, she wrote over 700 opinions on the D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • American First Ladies As Goodwill Ambassadors
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research Hunter College 2010 American First Ladies as Goodwill Ambassadors Wendy W. Tan CUNY Hunter College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/hc_pubs/12 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] American First Ladies as Goodwill Ambassadors: Summaries after studying materials available in Presidential Libraries By Wendy Tan Head of Cataloging, Hunter College Libraries, the City University of NY 695 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10065 Abstract Quite a few First Ladies took very active moves regarding international interests, and they often weighed in their opinions on their husbands’ decisions on related issues. My research was mainly conducted in five Presidential Libraries associated with five well-traveled First Ladies. After studying hundreds of journeys they made, my descriptions were focused on five, one for each lady, of them only. All of these trips shared a common trait, which was under the calling of humanitarian cause. Key Words American First Ladies; Goodwill Ambassadors; American Women 2 Introduction According to Gallup’s poll (2001) for the category of “most admired women”, 1948-1961 was Eleanor Roosevelt; 1962-1966 Jacqueline Kennedy; 1971-1973 Pat Nixon; 1977-1980 Rosalynn Carter; 1993-2000 Hillary Clinton. One of the qualifications shared by all these winners is that they were the First Ladies during much of those periods. Another characteristic present among these First Ladies is that they actively participated in activities taking place in foreign lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidents' Day Family
    Schedule at a Glance Smith Center Powers Room Learning Center The Pavilion Exhibit Galleries Accessibility: Performances Hands-on | Crafts Performances | Activities “Make and Take” Craft Activities Special Activities Learning Wheelchairs are available Shaping A New Nation Suffrage Centennial Center at the Visitor Admission 10:00 Desk on a first come, first served basis. Video Popsicle presentations in the Museum Stick Flags 10:30 Mini RFK 10:00 – 11:00 Foyer Elevators are captioned for visitors John & Abigail Adams WPA Murals Smith Center who are deaf or hard 10:30 – 11:10 Suffragist 10:00 – 11:30 Kennedy Scrimshaw of hearing. 11:00 Read Aloud Sashes & Campaign Hats 10:30 – 11:30 10:45 – 11:15 Sunflowers & Buttons James & Dolley Madison 10:00 – 12:30 10:00 – 12:15 Powers Café 11:30 11:10 – 11:50 Colonial Clothes Lucretia Mott Room 11:00 – 12:15 11:15 – 11:40 Adams Astronaut Museum Tour 11:15 – 12:20 Helmets 11:30 – 12:15 12:00 Eleanor Roosevelt 11:15 – 12:30 Restrooms 11:50 – 12:30 PT 109 Cart 12:30 Sojourner Truth Protest Popsicle 12:00 – 1:00 Presidential Press Conference 12:15 – 1:00 Posters Stick Flags 12:30 – 1:00 Museum Evaluation Station Presidential 12:00 – 1:30 12:00 – 1:30 Homes Store 1:00 James & Dolley Madison 12:30 – 1:30 Pavilion Adams Letter Writing 1:00 – 1:30 Astronaut Museum 1:00 – 1:40 to the President Space Cart Lucretia Mott Helmets Lobby 12:30 – 2:15 1:00 – 2:00 1:30 Eleanor Roosevelt 1:15 – 1:45 1:00 – 2:00 Entrance 1:30 – 2:00 2:00 John & Abigail Adams Sojourner Truth 2:00 – 2:30 2:00-2:30 Museum Tour Zines Scrimshaw 2:00 – 2:45 1:00 – 3:30 Mini 2:00 – 3:00 Sensory 2:30 Powerful Women Jeopardy WPA Murals Accommodations: 2:30 – 3:00 2:00 – 3:30 Kennedy The John F.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Editor
    FROM THE EDITOR ntering my third year as an editor for this journal, I am continually impressed by the insightful, creative and powerful cases presented by the talented student authors E that are selected each year. In the midst of other graduate and dissertation-related duties, I find myself consistently prioritizing reviewing these case studies because I enjoy getting to deeply explore topics I would never think to investigate on my own. Often, I’m initially surprised by the issue chosen, but find myself drawn in as I read through each case. These case studies offer a refreshing alternative to other academic research whichW avoids in-depth analysis of a particular case or example in favor of abstract and quantitative approaches to exploring social issues. The cases in our current issue center on women in politics, and the representation of women in the media. In exploring the role of women in politics, these authors have chosen to analyze women’s leadership in both contemporary and historic settings. One case investigates Eleanor Roosevelt’s sponsorship of subsistence housing projects, and questions the limits placed on first ladies to enact social change. Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s time on the supreme court, the role of the court, and concerns about her potential replacements are analyzed in another case. The political coverage of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential race is examined in another. As more women continue to engage in politics, how women’s leadership is assessed in comparison to men’s is of extreme importance. The divisive coverage of Hillary Clinton brings us to another important theme of this journal, the representation of women in the media.
    [Show full text]
  • This Transcript Was Exported on Sep 24, 2020 - View Latest Version Here
    This transcript was exported on Sep 24, 2020 - view latest version here. support message: This podcast is supported by the Walton Family Foundation. The Walton Family Foundation is at its core, a family led foundation, working to create access to opportunity for people and communities. The foundation partners with others to make a difference in K-12 education, the environment and its home region of Northwest Arkansas in the Arkansas Mississippi Delta. Learn more at waltonfamilyfoundation.org. Tricia Johnson: It's Aspen Ideas to Go from the Aspen Institute. I'm Trisha Johnson. Today we're featuring a conversation with Supreme Court Associate Justice, Ruth Bader Ginsburg from our archives. She died Friday. Ginsburg served as the second woman on the nation's highest court and was a champion of justice and steadfast advocate for civil and human rights. Her musical love was opera, yet her late in life status as a powerful cultural icon to a younger generation is more akin to a rockstar than a diva. Tricia Johnson: In 2018, a law student dubbed her the notorious RBG and the moniker consumed the internet and popular culture. Her wit and playful sense of humor are on full display in this conversation. Ruth Bader Ginsburg: And sad for me, I am a monotone. So I sing in only two places, one is the shower and the other is my dreams. Tricia Johnson: Aspen Ideas to Go brings you compelling conversations from the Aspen Institute. Today's show features Ginsburg speaking to the Aspen Wye Fellows in 2017 about her book, My Own Words.
    [Show full text]
  • Student Packet (PDF)
    AMERICANS AND THE HOLOCAUST STUDENT PACKET IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEES: DEBATING THE WAGNER-ROGERS BILL ushmm.org/americans NAME AMERICANS DATE AND THE HOLOCAUST Student Packet IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEES: DEBATING THE WAGNER-ROGERS BILL Document Analysis Worksheet Directions 1. Read the text of the bill before Congress. 2. Review background information about the bill. 3. Examine the document assigned to you and answer the questions below. What group or individual did you read about? Summarize this person’s or group’s stance on the bill (list two to three main points of the argument): What evidence (if any) does your individual or group provide to support the argument? What external factors might have shaped this and how it was received by the intended audience? ushmm.org/americans IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEES: DEBATING THE WAGNER-ROGERS BILL 2 AMERICANS AND THE HOLOCAUST Student Packet THE WAGNER-ROGERS BILL OF 1939 Sen. Robert Wagner speaks with Rep. Edith Nourse Rogers about their bill to admit German refugee children. Actress Helen Hayes, who testified in support of the bill, sits in the middle.Library of Congress On February 9, 1939, in an attempt to help rescue Jews fleeing Nazi persecution, Senator Robert Wagner, a Democrat from New York, and Representative Edith Nourse Rogers, a Republican from Massachusetts, introduced a bill to permit the entry of 20,000 refugee children, ages 14 and under, from Nazi Germany into the United States over the course of two years (10,000 in 1939 and 10,000 in 1940) outside of the existing quota limit. Charity organizations, religious groups, and labor unions across the country publicized the plight of German refugee children in an attempt to gain support for the Wagner-Rogers “Child Refugee” Bill.
    [Show full text]
  • INHERENT DIGNITY: Women Change Makers in the Progressive Era
    THE RECOGNITION OF INHERENT DIGNITY: Women Change Makers in the Progressive Era An original play based on mostly primary source documents by Steven Angel & Priscilla Kane Hellweg A Creative Education Product of ENCHANTED CIRCLE THEATER 4 Open Square Way Studio 204 Holyoke, MA 01040 www.enchantedcircletheater.com © 2017 ENCHANTED CIRCLE THEATER www.enchantedcircletheater.com 1 The Recognition of Inherent Dignity: Women Change Makers in the Progressive Era by Steven Angel & Priscilla Kane Hellweg NARRATOR 1: 1948 -- The Universal Declaration of Human Rights Preamble Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world, Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, …, Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law, Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations, Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in co-operation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms, Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge, Now, Therefore THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY proclaims THIS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, …1 1 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, UN, http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/ ENCHANTED CIRCLE THEATER www.enchantedcircletheater.com 2 Eleanor Roosevelt NARRATOR: Eleanor Roosevelt, The Struggle for Human Rights, September 28, 1948 Sorbonne, Paris, France ELEANOR ROOSEVELT: (More than two thousand people crowded into the university amphitheater on September 28 and many more were denied entry.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Mcleod Bethune (1875–1955)
    Mary McLeod Bethune (1875–1955) Mary McLeod Bethune was an educator and activist, serving as president of the National Association of Colored Women and founding the National Council of Negro Women. Who Was Mary McLeod Bethune? Mary McLeod Bethune was a child of formerly enslaved people. She graduated from the Scotia Seminary for Girls in 1893. Believing that education provided the key to racial advancement, Bethune founded the Daytona Normal and Industrial Institute in 1904, which later became Bethune- Cookman College. She founded the National Council of Negro Women in 1935. Bethune died in 1955. Early Life Born Mary Jane McLeod on July 10, 1875, in Mayesville, South Carolina, Mary McLeod Bethune was a leading educator and civil rights activist. She grew up in poverty, as one of 17 children born to formerly enslaved people. Everyone in the family worked, and many toiled in the fields, picking cotton. Bethune became the one and only child in her family to go to school when a missionary opened a school nearby for African American children. Traveling miles each way, she walked to school each day and did her best to share her newfound knowledge with her family. Bethune later received a scholarship to the Scotia Seminary (now Barber-Scotia College), a school for girls in Concord, North Carolina. After graduating from the seminary in 1893, she went to the Dwight Moody's Institute for Home and Foreign Missions (also known as Moody Bible Institute) in Chicago. Bethune completed her studies there two years later. Returning to the South, she began her career as a teacher.
    [Show full text]
  • Ranking America's First Ladies Eleanor Roosevelt Still #1 Abigail Adams Regains 2 Place Hillary Moves from 2 to 5 ; Jackie
    For Immediate Release: Monday, September 29, 2003 Ranking America’s First Ladies Eleanor Roosevelt Still #1 nd Abigail Adams Regains 2 Place Hillary moves from 2 nd to 5 th ; Jackie Kennedy from 7 th th to 4 Mary Todd Lincoln Up From Usual Last Place Loudonville, NY - After the scrutiny of three expert opinion surveys over twenty years, Eleanor Roosevelt is still ranked first among all other women who have served as America’s First Ladies, according to a recent expert opinion poll conducted by the Siena (College) Research Institute (SRI). In other news, Mary Todd Lincoln (36 th ) has been bumped up from last place by Jane Pierce (38 th ) and Florence Harding (37 th ). The Siena Research Institute survey, conducted at approximate ten year intervals, asks history professors at America’s colleges and universities to rank each woman who has been a First Lady, on a scale of 1-5, five being excellent, in ten separate categories: *Background *Integrity *Intelligence *Courage *Value to the *Leadership *Being her own *Public image country woman *Accomplishments *Value to the President “It’s a tracking study,” explains Dr. Douglas Lonnstrom, Siena College professor of statistics and co-director of the First Ladies study with Thomas Kelly, Siena professor-emeritus of American studies. “This is our third run, and we can chart change over time.” Siena Research Institute is well known for its Survey of American Presidents, begun in 1982 during the Reagan Administration and continued during the terms of presidents George H. Bush, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush (http://www.siena.edu/sri/results/02AugPresidentsSurvey.htm ).
    [Show full text]
  • Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
    VOLUME 134 JANUARY 2021 NUMBER 3 © 2021 by The Harvard Law Review Association MEMORIAM: JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG The editors of the Harvard Law Review respectfully offer this collec- tion of tributes to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Brenda Feigen∗ Ruth Bader Ginsburg changed all our lives by profoundly influenc- ing the law that had encouraged sex discrimination in the United States for centuries. I am writing now in tribute to her. In the nineteenth century, the Supreme Court ruled that women had neither the right to practice law1 nor the right to vote.2 In the mid- twentieth century, the Court approved “beneficial” practices by states making women’s service on juries optional3 and approved Michigan’s law preventing women from working in bars unless a male relative was present when they were working.4 In 1970, while some of us were joining the call of the women’s liber- ation movement to march in protest of outrageous sex discrimination, Ruth and her husband Marty, a tax lawyer, decided to represent Charles Moritz, who lived alone with his elderly mother and had tried to obtain a tax deduction for wages paid to her caregiver.5 The Tax Court had said that type of deduction was available only “to a woman, a widower ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– ∗ J.D. 1969, Harvard Law School. Ms. Feigen directed the ACLU’s Women’s Rights Project with then-Professor Ruth Bader Ginsburg. She was National Vice President for Legislation of NOW and a cofounder of the National Women’s Political Caucus and of Ms. Magazine. She au- thored Not One of the Boys: Living Life as a Feminist (2000), republished in electronic format twenty years later with a new edition forthcoming.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Addendeum to the Geraldine A. Ferraro Papers
    Second Addendeum to The Geraldine A. Ferraro Papers Marymount Manhattan College 221 East 71st Street New York, New York 10021 Archives Collection 3 Processed April 26, 2010 Mary Elizabeth Brown Daniel Saftler 1 Content Introduction 002 Correspondence Inventory (Box #227-#229) 003 Speeches Inventory (Boxes #229 to #230) 004 Subject Inventory (Box #230) 006 2 Introduction The two banker boxes comprising this third deposit of the Geraldine A. Ferraro Papers arrived at Marymount Manhattan College’s archives from Ms Ferraro’s former law office at Blank Rome in New York City in the winter of 2009. Processing of the previous two deposits governed the creation of series for this one. The Correspondence series documents Ferraro’s participation in Hillary Clinton’s campaign for the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination in 2008. The 58 folders include letters from most of the fifty states, most sent either in March or August of that year. One interesting feature is the number of letters from members of People United Means Actions (PUMA). The correspondence reflects the wide range of opinions the Obama campaign elicited. The Speeches series covers the period 1979 to 2008. Ferraro’s initial donation contains most of the speeches she gave when running for office and her first addendum contains speeches she gave as a member of the U.S. delegation the United Nations Commission on Human Rights; this addendum is strongest in speeches given after 1997. The collection reflects Ferraro’s work for a number of causes, especially her advocacy for patients with multiple myeloma, a disease she herself was diagnosed with in 1998.
    [Show full text]