Az DATE: November 16, 2017 TO: Transportation Commission FROM

Multimodal Planning Branch 4201 E. Arkansas Ave, Shumate Bldg. Denver, CO 80222

DATE: November 16, 2017 TO: Transportation Commission FROM: Herman Stockinger, Director, Office of Policy and Government Relations Debra Perkins-Smith, Director, Division of Transportation Development (DTD) SUBJECT: Senate Bill (SB) 17-267 Project Selection / Potential 2018 Ballot Measure

Purpose To discuss proposed projects for the initial two years of funding anticipated under SB 267, and approach for development of a project list to support a proposed 2018 ballot measure and future years of SB 267 funding.

Action The Commission will be asked to provide input on additional projects recommended for funding in the first two years of SB 267, and formalize this list. Also, the Commission will be asked to provide staff with input on the approach to the development of a project list for a potential 2018 ballot measure.

Background At the October Transportation Commission meeting, staff reviewed project selection criteria and initial recommendations for projects to be funded under the first two years of SB 267. SB 267 is anticipated to provide approximately $1.88 billion to CDOT over four years, beginning in Fiscal Year (FY) 2018-19. Proceeds to CDOT may be used for projects that are identified as Tier 1 in the 10-Year Development Program Plan, and at least 10% of proceeds must be used for transit projects. The bill further requires at least 25% of CDOT’s proceeds be applied to projects in counties with a population of 50,000 or less, as of July, 2015. The initial recommendations for SB 267 total $692,900,000 of the $792 million available for highway projects in the first two years of SB 267 funding. Staff will present additional recommendations this month to complete a tentative package of projects for the first two years of SB 267 (see Attachment A).

As staff proceeded with the identification of recommendations for SB 267 funding, discussions have progressed on a potential 2018 ballot measure for transportation. Staff anticipates needing a preliminary list of projects by the end of January for the ballot. The development of the ballot list will need to consider which projects would be best to include in the ballot list versus those that should be funded in the second two years of SB 267 funding. The projects for the ballot list will come from the Development Program (see Attachment B). The projects in the Development Program are currently being refined by the PMO and Regions to update costs.

Details In October, staff put forward seven projects for consideration of funding with the first two years of SB 267 revenue. Recognizing the desire to identify opportunities to use SB 267 to leverage other funding, staff directed attention to those projects that compete strongly against the identified SB 267 criteria, and which either already leverage discretionary grant awards, or are expected to compete well against criteria identified in the recent TIGER and INFRA solicitations. In addition to leveraging other funds, another key point of discussion with the Commission in previous months was consideration of how selected projects could help offset the impacts of repayment liability. One approach discussed was the selection of tolled projects, with the possibility of applying toll revenue to repayment. The selection of large asset management projects was also discussed as a possible way to offset the impacts of repayment, recognizing that as the largest category of funding in the CDOT budget, asset management would likely be impacted if CDOT’s repayment liability increased. Several of the projects identified in October also address criteria relating to potential to offset repayment impacts.

Highway Projects The current draft 10-Year Development Program Plan is included as Attachment B. The seven projects previously recommended for funding are highlighted in orange, and are listed below with additional transit element in parentheses:

4201 E. Arkansas Ave., Room 262, Denver, CO 80222-3400 P 303.757.9525 F 303.757.9656 www.codot.gov

 US 50: Little Blue Canyon - $9,500,000  US 550/160: Connection - $54,400,000  I-25 Colorado-Springs Denver South - $250,000,000 (plus $8,000,000 transit)  I-25: North SH 402 – SH 56 (Segment 6) - $200,000,000 (plus $10,000,000 transit)  I-70: Westbound PPSL - $80,000,000 (plus $5,000,000 transit)  SH 13 Reconstruction - $60,000,000  US 160: Towaoc Passing Lanes - $9,000,000

Additional projects meeting screening criteria are highlighted in blue. Of the additional projects that meet screening criteria (blue), staff recommends including the following:

 US 50: West of Pueblo, $35,520,000 – Region 2 has invested RPP and FASTER Safety funding into the project, as well as devolved SH 227 and SH 231 to the city and county. The design for the widening of the roadway between MP307 and 311 is in progress. The corridor Planning and Environmental Linkages (PEL) and implement plans were approved in 2012.  SH 9: Frisco North, $10,250,000 – This is the final project to complete the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and expand to four-lanes from Frisco to Breckenridge. Project has been a high priority for CDOT and Summit County since 2004.  I-70: Failing Pavement, $55,000,000– Safety of the traveling public, including visitors and freight, will improve by removing failing pavement, roadway rutting and high spots. Project is highly supported by the impacted counties, communities and the Eastern TPR.  ADA Improvements, $25,000,000 – Pursuant to conversations around the commitment to the ADA curb ramps program, funding for FY ’19 will come from available SB 267 funds.

When combining the seven projects previously recommended for funding (orange) with the additional staff recommended projects (blue), project funding in urban areas is 72% and 28% in rural areas. This funding distribution meets the bill requirements set forth in SB 267.

Transit Projects Approximately $23,000,000 has been identified in transit projects, such as park and rides to complement the highway projects identified in the list above. Over the next several months, outreach will be conducted on transit projects that should be included in the Development Program with the intention of using this process as the basis for the evaluation and prioritization of additional SB 267 projects.

Advisory Committee Input Proposed highway projects are part of the Tier I Development Program, which has been the subject of extensive Statewide Transportation Advisory Committee (STAC) and planning partner input. STAC provided input on the approach to SB 267 at meetings in June, July, and August. At the October STAC meeting, the staff recommended projects (above) and additional projects that meet screening criteria were discussed. Those projects suggested by staff had no objections from STAC representatives. In addition to those projects, a few STAC representatives also suggested that the following projects be given consideration:

 I-70: Business Loop in Grand Junction - The proposed project is the last segment of the I-70B corridor in Mesa County; project includes mobility and safety improvements through to US 50 connection.  I-70 Palisade to Debeque Curves – The proposed project includes a reconstruction with realignment of curves and other safety improvements. Phase one of this project is to start the Environmental Assessment (EA) and preliminary engineering.  US 287: Lamar Reliever Route Phase 1 – Phase one of the project includes a realignment of US 50 to the South, which is needed for future US50/US 287 Interchange. The EIS and Record of Decision (ROD) were signed in 2014. The design work of the Phase I of the project (US50 realignment) is almost completed.

Options Staff requests direction on how the Transportation Commission would prefer to proceed with the FY18-20 SB 267 project list. The staff recommends approving one of two options. These include:  Option 1: Approve the complete SB 267 project list for FY 18-20 through resolution this month. This option formalizes the commitment of SB 267 funds to specific projects; however, it provides the opportunity to revisit this decision when the results of the discretionary awards are known.

4201 E. Arkansas Ave., Room 262, Denver, CO 80222-3400 P 303.757.9525 F 303.757.9656 www.codot.gov

 Option 2: Do not formalize the commitment of SB 267 funds at this time except for the US 550/160 project. Approval of up to $54.4 million of SB 267 funds for the US 550/160 project is required at this time to obtain the awarded federal FASTLANE grant funds (see Attachment D for details on this project). For the other projects, a SB 267 project list could be maintained but not formally approved until more details are known about the SB 267 program or a formal action is needed in response to a required match on a discretionary grant award.

Resolutions for both options are included in Attachment C.

Next Steps  November – update and refine project cost estimates, and further vetting and development of list of projects for a potential 2018 ballot measure.  December 8 – STAC – Discussion and input on 2018 ballot list  December 13 – Transportation Commission Workshop on 2018 ballot list  January, 2018 – Approval of draft ballot list by STAC and TC  Spring 2018 – Revisit tentative SB 267 priorities based on INFRA/TIGER decisions, and updates on status of Certificates of Participation (COPs)

Attachments  Attachment A: Presentation  Attachment B: 10-Year Development Program Plan with SB 267 Criteria  Attachment C: Potential Resolutions  Attachment D: Region 5 RTD Mike McVaugh memo regarding US 550/160 project funding options

4201 E. Arkansas Ave., Room 262, Denver, CO 80222-3400 P 303.757.9525 F 303.757.9656 www.codot.gov

Attachment A: SB 267 - Ballot Presentation Page 1

Senate Bill (SB) 267 Project Selection November 2017 Attachment A: SB 267 - Ballot Presentation Page 2

SB 267 Project Selection

• Framework – Overarching framework for project selection process – Statewide project selection process (not subdivided between urban and rural) – Should reasonably adhere to identified Tier 1 projects of SB 267 passage – Initially identify only projects for the first two years of SB 267 funding ($880 million, with a minimum of 10% for transit) – Consider how SB 267 funding can position us to be ready for the possibility of other new funding sources – Consider how SB 267 funding can be used to leverage other funding. – Consider how selected projects can help offset the impacts of repayment liability.

2 Attachment A: SB 267 - Ballot Presentation Page 3

SB 267 Project Selection

• Key Criteria – Used to screen and evaluate projects – Project Readiness – Ready to proceed to construction by end of the state fiscal year for which funds are available (June 30, 2020, for the first two years of SB 267 funding)

Screen – Strategic Nature – Of regional or statewide significance – Stakeholder Support – Identified as high priority by Region or TPR(s) or identified as a high priority in a Regional Transportation Plan – Statewide Plan Goal Areas – Supports statewide plan goal areas of safety, mobility, maintaining the system, and economic vitality – Leveraging Other Funds – Leverages other funds, such as discretionary grants, local funds, or toll revenue. – Potential to Offset Repayment Impact – Helps to offset potential Evaluate repayment impacts to existing programs (i.e. tolling projects, asset management projects). – Supports Statewide System – Supports a statewide transportation system. 3 Attachment A: SB 267 - Ballot Presentation Page 4

SB 267 Project Selection

• Project Readiness Tier I Development Program Projects • Strategic Nature • Stakeholder Support Projects Meeting Screening Criteria

Supports SWP Goal Areas Potential to Leverages offset Other Funding repayment / Tolling impact

Supports statewide system 4 Attachment A: SB 267 - Ballot Presentation Page 5

SB 267 Project Selection

• Projects leveraging other funding / tolling – Competitive against SB 267 Key Criteria – Potential to leverage significant other funding and/or generates toll revenue Leverages Offset Other Repayment Statewide Support Project Funding Impact Plan Goals Statewide System US 50: Little Blue Canyon X X X X

US 550/160: Connection X X X I-25 Colorado-Springs Denver South X X X X I-25 North: SH 56 – SH 402 (Segment 6) X X X X I-70: Westbound PPSL X X X X SH 13 Reconstruction X X X X US 160: Towaoc Passing Lanes X X X 5 Attachment A: SB 267 - Ballot Presentation Page 6

SB 267 Project Selection

*Depending on option, $32.7 M - $54.4 M 6 **$880 million total SB 267 in FY 18-19 and FY 19-20, with a minimum of $88 million (10%) for transit) Attachment A: SB 267 - Ballot Presentation Page 7

SB 267 Project Selection

7 Attachment A: SB 267 - Ballot Presentation Page 8

SB 267 Project Selection

• $129 Million Unallocated Year 1-2 • None of the Remaining Potential SB 267 Projects Leverage Other Discretionary Funding • Geographic Distribution for Statewide System – ADA Improvements (Statewide) – East – South (Pueblo Area) – Middle (Mountain Region)

8 Attachment A: SB 267 - Ballot Presentation Page 9

SB 267 Project Selection

EAST

Offset Statewide Plan Goals Support Stakeholder Project Repayment Safety Maintain Mobility Economic Statewide Support Impact Vitality System

SH 71: Super 2 X X X X X X

I-76: Fort Morgan to X X X X X Brush

I-70: Replace TOP PRIORITY / Failing X X X SECOND ONLY X Pavement TO I-25

9 Attachment A: SB 267 - Ballot Presentation Page 10

SB 267 Project Selection MIDDLE Offset Statewide Plan Goals Support Stakeholder Project Repayment Statewide Safety Maintain Mobility Economic Support Impact Vitality System SH 9: Frisco TOP PRIORITY North X X X / PROJECT X COMPLETION SH 17: Safety and Mobility Improvements X X X X X North of Mosca I-70 West: Vail X X X X X Pass I-70 West: Dowd Canyon X X X X Interchange 10 Attachment A: SB 267 - Ballot Presentation Page 11

SB 267 Project Selection

SOUTH

Offset Statewide Plan Goals Support Stakeholder Project Repayment Safety Maintain Mobility Economic Statewide Support Impact Vitality System

TOP PRIORITY US 50: West of X X / PROJECT X Pueblo COMPLETION I-25: 29th St. Section (Phase of the New X X X X X X Pueblo Freeway EIS)

US 287: Lamar X X X X X Reliever Route 11 Attachment A: SB 267 - Ballot Presentation Page 12

SB 267 Project Selection

12 Attachment A: SB 267 - Ballot Presentation Page 13

SB 267 Project Selection

Tentative SB 267 Project Commitment Urban Rural US 50: Little Blue Canyon $9,500,000 $9,500,000 US 550/160: Connection* $54,400,000 $54,400,000 I-25 Colorado-Springs Denver South $250,000,000 $250,000,000 I-25: North SH 402 – SH 56 (Segment 6) $200,000,000 $200,000,000 I-70: Westbound PPSL $80,000,000 $80,000,000 SH 13 Reconstruction $60,000,000 $60,000,000 US 160: Towaoc Passing Lanes $9,000,000 $9,000,000 US 50: West of Pueblo $35,520,000 $35,520,000 SH 9: Frisco North $10,250,000 $10,250,000 I-70 East: Failing Pavement $55,000,000 $55,000,000 ADA Improvements $25,000,000 $25,000,000 Total $788,670,000 $564,920,000 $223,750,000 Max available for Highways for FY 19 - FY 20** $792,000,000 72% 28% Remaining $3,300,000 *Depending on option, $32.7 M - $54.4 M **$880 million total SB 267 in FY 18-19 and FY 19-20, with a minimum of $88 million (10%) for transit) 13 Attachment A: SB 267 - Ballot Presentation Page 14 Ballot List Preparation

Tier II projects moved up to Tier I Tier I Projects

SB 267 (Years 1-2)

SB 267 Priorities for Ballot List (Years 3-4) Future Years

Project or scope not identified for SB 267 or ballot list – become Tier II Projects Attachment A: SB 267 - Ballot Presentation Page 15

Ballot Project Selection

• Next Steps – November: Update and refine cost estimates and further vetting and development of the list of projects for potential 2018 ballot measure. – December 8: STAC meeting to discuss "straw-man" list of ballot projects – December 13: TC meeting to discuss “straw-man” list of ballot projects – December – January: Continue to refine list and provide updated cost estimates for draft projects. – January 17-18: TC Workshop and Action on project list (if necessary) – January 26: STAC meeting to review and discuss project list post-TC action

15 Attachment A: SB 267 - Ballot Presentation Page 16

Questions?

16 10-Year Development Program Plan - Highway Projects DRAFT UPDATE - OCTOBER 17, 2017 TIER I PROJECTS

A B C D E F G H I J K L M Project Summary Updated Funding Need/Total Project Costs

Project Total Project Cost Updated Other Funding Line ID Region TPR Project Name Project Description Cost Estimate Details Phasing Tier Total Project Cost (Escalated) Funding Need Other Funding Assumptions

Tolling will be Corridor mobility and safety improvements Subsequent phase includes additional work considered on this from Monument to C-470 as outlined in the needed to improve geometrics and corridor and could Greater Denver I:25: Colorado Springs PEL currently underway. Assumes construction Cost reflects minimum costs utilizing reconstrut roadway, and full PEL potentially mitigate Area, Denver South of one new lane in each direction from existing infrastructure but may not improvements north of Plum Creek Parkway some costs. 1 1 1 Pikes Peak Area Connection Monument to Plum Creek Parkway. meet desired geometrics. to C-470. 1 $ 319,530,000 $ 350,940,000 $ 350,940,000 $ -

Completion of the Alameda Interchange on I- 25 including reconstruction of Lipan, City and County of I-25: Valley Highway reconstruction of the Alameda Bridge over the Denver Greater Denver Phase 2: I-25 and South Platte and finalization of ramp 2 2 1 Area Alameda configurations. 1 $ 27,030,000 $ 29,730,000 $ 2,730,000 $ 27,000,000

Subsequent phase (not reflected in costs) includes second phase roadway widening, Greater Denver I-25: Speer and 23rd Replacement of bridges at 23rd and Speer, and and other safety and mobility improvements 3 3 1 Area Bridges construction of northbound connector road. to be identified in planned PEL. 1 $ 46,740,000 $ 54,060,000 $ 54,060,000 $ -

Improvements on I-25 between US 36 and 120th including addition of one General Purpose lane in each direction from 84th Ave. to Thornton Pkwy. and reconstruction of 88th Subsequent phase (not reflected in costs) Greater Denver I-25 North: US 36 to Ave. bridge including a center loading median includes second phase auxiliary lanes and 4 4 1 Area 120th station for the Thornton Park-n-Ride. other improvements. 1 $ 75,240,000 $ 82,330,000 $ 82,330,000 $ -

Expansion of Tolled Express Lanes (TELs) from Tolling current planned end at E-470 to Weld County Greater Denver I-25 North: TEL Line. Project would need to be combined with 5 5 1 Area Expansion local funds to rebuild I-25 / SH 7 Interchange. 1 $ 91,730,000 $ 98,030,000 $ 23,030,000 $ 75,000,000 Tolling will be considered on this I-70 West: Westbound Construction of Peak Period Shoulder Lanes corridor and could Greater Denver Peak Period Shoulder (PPSL) on westbound side from Twin Tunnels potentially mitigate 6 6 1 Area Lanes (PPSL) to Empire Junction. 1 $ 76,320,000 $ 80,940,000 $ 80,940,000 $ - costs.

Bridge Enterprise

Reconstruction of westbound Bridge at US 6 Final alternative is unknown and the Tolling will be (MP 244) and construction of third lane alignment may vary. Project could considered on this westbound down Floyd Hill to bridge. potentially be phased to incorporate corridor and could Construction of third lane to Twin Tunnels- improvements in westbound direction only potentially mitigate Greater Denver either Peak Period Shoulder Lanes (PPSL) or based on alternative selected and funding some costs. 7 7 1 Area I-70 West: Floyd Hill permanent. availability. 1 $ 548,380,000 $ 597,290,000 $ 527,290,000 $ 70,000,000

Reconstruction of interchange to reduce Greater Denver congestion and improve operational 8 8 1 Area I-70: Kipling Interchange performance and safety. 1 $ 56,300,000 $ 60,800,000 $ 60,800,000 $ -

Attachment B: Development Plan - Tier I Page 1 A B C D E F G H I J K L M Project Summary Updated Funding Need/Total Project Costs

Remove bottleneck at Yosemite by splitting traffic going to northbound and southbound I- Greater Denver 25 with two lanes for each direction. Includes 9 10 1 Area I-225: I-25 to Yosemite replacement of Ulster bridge. 1 $ 54,520,000 $ 58,890,000 $ 58,890,000 $ -

Reconstruction to improve capacity, safety, Tolling and economic competitiveness. Capacity Greater Denver I-270: Widening from I- improvements, replacement of bridges, and 10 11 1 Area 76 to I-70 reconstruction of concrete pavement. 1 $ 311,180,000 $ 366,750,000 $ 16,750,000 $ 350,000,000 Greater Denver US 6: Wadsworth Reconstruction of the interchange at US 6 and 11 13 1 Area Interchange Wadsworth. 1 $ 60,520,000 $ 65,450,000 $ 65,450,000 $ -

Reconstruction of two lane roadway to four Project could be divided into phases: US 85 Greater Denver US 85: Louviers to lanes with a divided median and acceleration/ Sedalia to Daniels Park; US 85 Castlegate to 12 14 1 Area Meadows Widening deceleration lanes. Includes a 10 foot trail. Meadows 1 $ 80,090,000 $ 94,260,000 $ 94,260,000

Reconstruction of the interchange at I-270 and intersection at 60th Ave. to improve the safety and capacity by making the geometric configuration more intuitive for drivers, adding Phasing and early implementation Greater Denver US 85/Vasquez: I-270 to grade separation, and improving access points alternatives are being investigated as part of 13 15 1 Area 62nd Ave. Interchange based on a PEL study recommendation. the PEL. 1 $ 84,220,000 $ 95,310,000 $ 95,310,000 $ -

Construction of a grade separated interchange at 104th & US 85. The project will also grade Greater Denver US 85: 104th Grade separate 104th at the UPRR crossing just east 14 121 1 Area Separation of US 85. 1 $ 93,470,000 $ 102,310,000 $ 102,310,000 $ -

Construction of a grade separated interchange at 120th & US 85. The project will also grade Greater Denver US 85: 120th Grade separate 120th at the UPRR Crossing just east 15 122 1 Area Separation of US 85. 1 $ 78,740,000 $ 86,310,000 $ 86,310,000 $ -

Widening of roadway to four lanes with Greater Denver US 285: Richmond Hill to median and construction of grade separated Includes Kings Valley Interchange and 16 16 1 Area Shaffer's Crossing interchange at King's Valley. first widening segment only. Additional phases will remain. 1 $ 55,550,000 $ 58,800,000 $ 58,800,000 $ -

Central Front US 24 East: Widening Widening of roadway to four lanes from Range, Pikes Peak Garrett/Dodge to Garett/Dodge Rd. to Stapleton Rd. (MP 317.9 - 17 22 2 Area Stapleton Rd. 322.6) 1 $ 55,230,000 $ 61,000,000 $ 61,000,000 $ -

Attachment B: Development Plan - Tier I Page 2 A B C D E F G H I J K L M Project Summary Updated Funding Need/Total Project Costs

Central Front US 285: Fairplay to Addition of passing lanes and shoulder 18 99 2 Range Richmond Hill widening. (MP 183 - 234) 1 $ 19,320,000 $ 21,040,000 $ 21,040,000 $ -

SH 115: Rock Creek Bridge replacement on SH 115 over Rock Creek Central Front Bridge Replacement and Bridge and widening for approximately 1.5 20 100 2 Range Widening miles south. (MP 37-39) 1 $ 15,000,000 $ 15,000,000 $ 15,000,000 $ -

Widening of roadway to six lanes from MP 135- 137 South Academy to Circle, and Project could be divided into phases: I-25 Surface Treatment I:25: Colorado Springs improvements between MP 132-MP 135 from Garden of the Gods to Fillmore Aux Lanes: Congestion Relief SH 16 to South Academy, addition of auxiliary $26 M; I-25 Ramp Metering Circle to N. (Fountain to N. lanes from Garden of the Gods to Fillmore, and Academy : $5 M; I-25 S. Academy to Circle: 21 19 2 Pikes Peak Area Academy) addition of ramp metering. $90 M; I-25 SH 16 to S. Academy: $72 M 1 $ 193,410,000 $ 207,190,000 $ 191,390,000 $ 15,800,000

SH 21: Intersection Improvements- Construction of new interchanges along SH 21 Constitution to North at Constitution and North Carefree. (MP 143.5- 22 116 2 Pikes Peak Area Carefree 145.3) 1 $ 132,950,000 $ 143,650,000 $ 143,650,000 $ -

Construction of new grade-separated SH 21: Research Pkwy. interchange at SH 21 and Research Pkwy (MP 23 28 2 Pikes Peak Area Interchange 149.6-150.5). 1 $ 38,240,000 $ 41,730,000 $ 41,730,000 $ - Drainage and intersection improvements on US 24 West: I-25 to US 24 from I-25 to Woodland Park (MP 283.0- 24 20 2 Pikes Peak Area Woodland Park 303.8). 1 $ 33,030,000 $ 34,680,000 $ 34,680,000 $ -

Complete reconstruction and widening, construction of a split-diamond interchange between City Center Drive and 13th St. with I-25: City Center Drive to additional exit ramps near 6th St., and 13th St. (Phase of the construction of one-way frontage roads 25 17 2 Pueblo Area New Pueblo Freeway) between the ramps. (MP 98.5-99.4) 1 $ 200,730,000 $ 224,370,000 $ 224,370,000 $ -

Reconstruction of the US 50 Bypass interchange and the US 50 Bridge over I-25: US 50 Interchange Fountain Creek. Includes widening I-25 from with I-25 (Phase of the 13th St. to US 50B Interchange (MP 99.5- 26 124 2 Pueblo Area New Pueblo Freeway) 100.5). 1 $ 102,710,000 $ 114,240,000 $ 114,240,000 $ -

Attachment B: Development Plan - Tier I Page 3 A B C D E F G H I J K L M Project Summary Updated Funding Need/Total Project Costs

Part of Phase 1 of the New Pueblo Freeway. Widening of the interstate from two to three I-25: 29th St. Section lanes in each direction and relocation of (Phase of the New interchange ramps and construction of 27 18 2 Pueblo Area Pueblo Freeway EIS) frontage roads. (MP 99.0-101.4) 1 $ 63,440,000 $ 70,310,000 $ 70,310,000 $ -

I-25: Dillon Blvd. Extension (Phase of the Construct Dillon Drive (four-lanes) from 26th 28 125 2 Pueblo Area New Pueblo Freeway) St. south to US 50 B (MP 316.01). 1 $ 9,500,000 $ 10,300,000 $ 10,300,000 $ -

Subsequent phase (not reflected in costs) Widening of the divided highway from two includes second phase grade separated 29 23 2 Pueblo Area US 50: West of Pueblo lanes to three lanes (MP 307-311). interchange. 1 $ 34,270,000 $ 35,520,000 $ 35,520,000 $ -

Implement Tier II projects along the US 50 Corridor (MP 318.5-467.5) per the Tier I FEIS/ROD. Likely projects include widening US Pueblo Area, 50 to four lanes, shoulders, passing lanes, and 30 24 2 Southeast US 50B: East Widening other safety improvements. 1 $ 71,720,000 $ 78,670,000 $ 78,670,000 $ - I-25: SH 10/ SH 160 Interchange Reconstruction at Reconstruction of I-25/SH 10/SH 160 31 123 2 South Central Walsenburg Interchange. (MP 50) 1 $ 46,590,000 $ 50,000,000 $ 50,000,000 $ -

US 160: Mobility Addition of passing lanes and shoulder 32 98 2 South Central Improvements widening. (La Veta Pass to I-25) 1 $ 20,380,000 $ 21,560,000 $ 21,560,000 $ -

Phase I and II of the Reliever Route. Realignment of US 50 to the South - needed for future US50/US 287 Interchange. (US 50 MP 433-435). Phase II is the construction of Project could be divided into phases: Phase I US 287: Lamar Reliever the new two lane reliever route. (US 287: MP US 50 Realignment ~$30 M; Phase II US 287 33 25 2 Southeast Route 73-80.5) Reliever Route ~$215 M 1 $ 175,480,000 $ 186,800,000 $ 186,800,000 $ -

Shoulder widening, safety improvements, and FASTER Safety - $4 M SH 69 and SH 12 passing lanes on SH 69 (MP 0-59) and SH 12 RPP - $2 M 34 128 2 South Central Improvements (MP 0-73.9) 1 $ 24,160,000 $ 25,000,000 $ 19,000,000 $ 6,000,000

Reconstruction of First and Grand intersection to improve operations and safety, meet current geometric design standards, and 35 30 3 Grand Valley I-70: Business Loop improve pedestrian safety. 1 $ 29,290,000 $ 31,310,000 $ 31,310,000 $ -

I-70: Palisade to Reconstruction with realignment of curves and 36 31 3 Grand Valley Debeque other safety improvements. Project can be phased. 1 $ 62,650,000 $ 68,500,000 $ 68,500,000 $ -

Attachment B: Development Plan - Tier I Page 4 A B C D E F G H I J K L M Project Summary Updated Funding Need/Total Project Costs

Safety and mobility improvements throughout the corridor including intersections, shoulders, US 6: Improvements and other safety and mobility improvements at 37 39 3 Grand Valley Mesa County problem locations throughout the corridor. 1 $ 20,730,000 $ 22,370,000 $ 22,370,000 $ -

Upgrade to roadway template and additional lanes from D Rd. to B 1/2 RD for safety and 38 135 3 Grand Valley SH 141B: Mesa County congestion reduction. 1 $ 19,110,000 $ 20,570,000 $ 20,570,000 $ -

Construction of safety improvements including Project could be divided into phases of SH 340: Safety and adding/widening paved shoulders and approximately $11 M, $4 M, and $7.5 M. 39 51 3 Grand Valley Capacity improvements intersection improvements. The remainder of the corridor is scalable. 1 $ 22,490,000 $ 23,590,000 $ 23,590,000 $ -

Reconstruction and widening of existing Federal Lands Access roadway to meet current geometric design Program - $18 M standards and improve safety, drainage and NHFP - $2 M acces. Addition of passing lanes and mitigation of geohazard land-slide within the project 40 43 3 Gunnison Valley US 50: Little Blue Canyon limits. 1 $ 29,500,000 $ 29,500,000 $ 9,500,000 $ 20,000,000

Intersection improvements, bicycle and US 550: Safety pedestrian mobility, and improved wildlife 41 137 3 Gunnison Valley Improvements mitigation. 1 $ 19,200,000 $ 21,520,000 $ 21,520,000 $ -

Safety improvements including reconstruction of the surface, addition of 4-8' paved shoulders across Rogers Mesa, and other SH 92: Safety safety improvements including access and 42 49 3 Gunnison Valley Improvements intersection improvements. 1 $ 29,620,000 $ 31,360,000 $ 31,360,000 $ -

I-70: Garfield County Upgrade of current 4-way stop at the Interchange intersection of I-70 Spur/US6 with a Improvements (New roundabout concluded to be necessary from a 43 132 3 Intermountain Castle) recently completed corridor study for I-70. 1 $ 13,840,000 $ 14,620,000 $ 14,620,000 $ -

Address critical safety need by removing old deficient rail and replacing with Type 8 Special. I-70: Glenwood Canyon New bridge rail will be MASH rated and will 44 133 3 Intermountain Bridge Rail require redesign. Project can be phased. 1 $ 40,390,000 $ 43,800,000 $ 43,800,000 $ -

Road and bridge widening, interspection and pedestrian improvements to southern half of Eagle County the Edwards Spur Rd., starting north of the roadway bridge and ending with connection to 45 33 3 Intermountain I-70: Edwards Spur Rd. US 6 to the south. 1 $ 21,730,000 $ 23,000,000 $ 16,500,000 $ 6,500,000

Attachment B: Development Plan - Tier I Page 5 A B C D E F G H I J K L M Project Summary Updated Funding Need/Total Project Costs

I-70 West: Dowd Canyon Reconstruction and upgrade of I-70 Dowd 46 34 3 Intermountain Interchange Canyon Interchange for safety and operations. 1 $ 13,360,000 $ 13,950,000 $ 13,950,000 $ -

Completion of NEPA, engineering and construction of third lane in both directions to increase safety and mobility. Includes installation of permanent water quality Project can be phased. 47 35 3 Intermountain I-70 West: Vail Pass features, and relocation of bike path. $4.5 M for preliminary engineering. 1 $ 202,270,000 $ 225,000,000 $ 225,000,000 $ -

Conversion of single lane roundabout at ramp I-70 West: Exit 203 termini to a double lane to correct back ups on Interchange westbound I-70 in peak periods and weave Project can be phased. 48 36 3 Intermountain Improvements from an auxiliary lane east of the ramp. $2 M for preconstruction. 1 $ 9,970,000 $ 10,980,000 $ 10,980,000 $ -

Construction of eastbound auxiliary lane from I-70 West: Frisco to MP 203 to 205. Identified in the Silverthorne Silverthorne Auxiliary Interchange PEL as a safety improvement for 49 37 3 Intermountain Lane eastbound I-70. Minimal widening required. 1 $ 14,550,000 $ 15,890,000 $ 15,890,000 $ -

Reconstruction of Exit 205 (Silverthorne) interchange including construction of a Diverging Diamond Interchange, extensive paving, curb, drainage. All four ramps I-70 West: Silverthorne affected, including new capacity on westbound 50 38 3 Intermountain Interchange on ramps. 1 $ 21,510,000 $ 24,330,000 $ 24,330,000 $ -

Completion of corridor including minimal widening, water quality and drainage improvements, and improvements to two intersections including the potential for the 51 44 3 Intermountain SH 9: Frisco North replacement of a signal with a roundabout. 1 $ 9,490,000 $ 10,250,000 $ 10,250,000 $ -

Reconstruction of NHS and high volume truck route to add shoulders, game fence and 52 45 3 Intermountain SH 13: Rifle North wildlife underpasses. Project can be phased. 1 $ 76,040,000 $ 85,130,000 $ 85,130,000 $ -

Construction of capacity improvements on US 40 between Fraser and Winter Park, likely US 40: Fraser to Winter widening to a four lane facility and adding a 53 41 3 Northwest Park roundabout. 1 $ 12,070,000 $ 13,000,000 $ 13,000,000 $ -

Addition of shoulders and passing lanes on 14 Subsequent phase (not reflected in costs) US 40: Kremmling East miles. Can be implemented in phases. (MP 178- includes improvement to Byers Canyon 54 134 3 Northwest and West 184) and (185.5-190.1). estimated at roughly $20 M. 1 $ 34,860,000 $ 38,000,000 $ 38,000,000 $ -

Attachment B: Development Plan - Tier I Page 6 A B C D E F G H I J K L M Project Summary Updated Funding Need/Total Project Costs

SH 13: Rio Blanco South to County Line Shoulders Addition of shoulders and passing lanes. Can 55 46 3 Northwest and Passing Lanes be implemented in phases. 1 $ 22,510,000 $ 23,810,000 $ 23,810,000 $ -

Reconstruction of NHS and high volume truck route to add shoulders, game fence and wildlife underpasses. Can be implemented in 56 47 3 Northwest SH 13: Wyoming South phases. Project is scalable. 1 $ 43,760,000 $ 46,640,000 $ 46,640,000 $ - Safety improvements including reconstruction SH 139: Little Horse of the surface and addition of 4-8' paved 57 50 3 Northwest South shoulders. 1 $ 21,070,000 $ 22,110,000 $ 22,110,000 $ -

Development of permanent water quality solutions on passes affected by the use of traction sand. Region 3 is responsible for 13 mountain passes several of which require the use of traction sand. Over the years several Region 3 Sediment tons have accumulated and now are 58 153 3 Multiple Control Plan endangering the environment and wildlife. 1 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ -

Project could be divided into phases: MP 368-380 HMA Rutting / Cracking ~$81.3 M; Replacement of ASR and HMA pavement and MP 380-395.1 Failing SMA ~$105 M; I-70: Replace Failing associated safety improvements for four MP 402 - 407 Failing ASR ~$20 M; MP 427- 59 53 4 Eastern Pavement segments between Limon and Burlington. 436.3 Failing HMA ~$52.5 M 1 $ 248,880,000 $ 258,770,000 $ 258,770,000 $ -

Subsequent phase (not reflected in costs) includes additional reconstruction, intersection improvements, shoulders, and US 385: Intersection, other safety improvements: Cheyenne Shoulders, and Other Intersection, shoulders, and other safety County ~$128 M; Kit Carson ~$195 M; Yuma Safety Improvements at improvements at problem locations Cheyenne ~$330 M; Phillips County ~$155 M; Sedgwick 60 66 4 Eastern Problem Locations Wells south. ~$135 M 1 $ 16,700,000 $ 22,000,000 $ 22,000,000 $ - Subsequent phase (not reflected in updated Intersection improvements on SH 66. costs) includes widening, safety, and RPP Greater Denver SH 66: Corridor Additional outcomes and specific projects to additional intersection improvements to be 61 70 4 Area Improvements West be determined through an in-progress PEL. identified in PEL. 1 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ - $ 1,500,000

Construction of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)/ Project could be divided into phases: Greater Denver SH 119: BRT/Managed Managed Lane and interchange at SH 119 and BRT / Managed Lane ~$139.3 M 62 74 4 Area Lanes SH 52. SH 119 / SH 52 Interchange ~$38.5 M 1 $ 145,800,000 $ 160,160,000 $ 160,160,000 $ - Subsequent phase (not reflected in updated costs) includes: Addition of one Tolled Express Lane in each SH 7 to SH 66 ~$86.1 M direction, interchange reconstruction, mainline SH 402 to SH 14 (replace interchanges and Tolling reconstruction, safety, and Intelligent infrastructure) ~$300 M North Front Range, Transportation System (ITS) improvements on US 34 and Centerra Interchanges ~$170 M Greater Denver segment 5 (SH 66 to 56) and 6 (SH 56 to SH Cost includes segment 5 (SH 66 to 56) SH 14 Interchange ~$55 M 63 52 4 Area I-25 North: SH 7 to SH 14 402). and Segment 6 (SH 56 to 402). SH 14 to Wellington ~$100 M 1 $ 602,550,000 $ 653,220,000 $ 553,220,000 $ 100,000,000

Attachment B: Development Plan - Tier I Page 7 A B C D E F G H I J K L M Project Summary Updated Funding Need/Total Project Costs

Improvements to the safety and capacity of "Spaghetti Junction" interchange by making US 34 / US 85 the geometric configuration more intuitive, Interchange adding grade separations, and improving 64 58 4 North Front Range Reconfiguration access points. 1 $ 183,000,000 $ 198,640,000 $ 198,640,000 $ -

I-76: Fort Morgan to Reconstruction of roadway and interchanges 65 54 4 Upper Front Range Brush: Phase 4 between Ft. Morgan and Brush. 1 $ 37,880,000 $ 39,720,000 $ 39,720,000 $ -

I-76: Fort Morgan to Reconstruction of roadway and interchanges 66 114 4 Upper Front Range Brush Phase 5 between Ft. Morgan and Brush. 1 $ 57,470,000 $ 60,140,000 $ 60,140,000 $ -

SH 52 Interchange in 67 69 4 Upper Front Range Hudson Reconstruction of interchange. 1 $ 13,220,000 $ 13,940,000 $ 13,940,000 $ - Project could be divided into two phases of Reconstruction of corridor to Super 2 roughly equal value: Upper Front Range, configuration from Limon to Nebraska state Limon to Brush 68 72 4 Eastern SH 71 Super 2 line. Brush to Nebraska 1 $ 369,520,000 $ 403,910,000 $ 403,910,000 $ - Subsequent phases (not reflected in updated costs) include: Upper Front Range, Construction of new Peckham interchange, US 85: I-76 to WCR22 ~$170 M+ROW North Front Range, railroad siding extensions, and closure of Project includes: US 85/WCR44 in US 85: WCR22 to WCR48 ~$213 M+ROW Greater Denver US 85: Corridor county roads to reduce access points and Peckham ~$35.8 M; UPRR Sidings US 85: WCR 48 to SH 392 ~$131 M+ ROW 69 60 4 Area Improvements construction of alternative routes. ~$66.8 M US 85: SH 392 to WCR100 ~$3 M+ ROW 1 $ 96,590,000 $ 101,840,000 $ 101,840,000 $ -

US 550: Shoulder Improvements, Deer Fencing and Animal Underpasses between Addition of shoulders between Uncompahgre Uncompahgre River and River and Colona (Billy Creek). Construction of 70 94 5 Gunnison Valley Colona (Billy Creek) deer fencing and animal underpasses. Not scalable. 1 $ 26,940,000 $ 29,560,000 $ 29,560,000 $ -

SH 17: Safety and Mobility Improvements Surface Treatment North of Mosca (Widen Scalable, multiple projects (3-4) could be 71 95 5 San Luis Valley shoulders) Shoulder widening north of Mosca. completed. 1 $ 34,200,000 $ 36,190,000 $ 32,190,000 $ 4,000,000

US 160: Towaoc Passing 72 81 5 Southwest Lanes Addition of passing lanes and vehicle turnouts. Not scalable. 1 $ 10,900,000 $ 11,220,000 $ 11,220,000 $ -

Completion of improvements consistent with the EIS and ROD, which includes widening, 73 138 5 Southwest US 160: Elmore's East access improvements, and wildlife mitigation. Not scalable. 1 $ 32,970,000 $ 36,080,000 $ 36,080,000 $ - US 160: Pagosa Reconstruction and Surface Treatment Multi-Modal Reconstruction to correct wheel rutting and Scalable with 2 distinct projects; bridge and 74 84 5 Southwest Improvements addition of pedestrian facilities for safety. roadway. 1 $ 21,300,000 $ 22,770,000 $ 19,770,000 $ 3,000,000

Attachment B: Development Plan - Tier I Page 8 A B C D E F G H I J K L M Project Summary Updated Funding Need/Total Project Costs

Major reconstruction requiring widening to a four lane roadway, including earthwork, drainage, irrigation, utilities, HMA paving, pedestrian bridge, sound wall, small and large 75 90 5 Southwest US 550 South: Sunnyside mammal crossings. Project is scalable to a two lane roadway. 1 $ 30,380,000 $ 32,620,000 $ 32,620,000 $ -

Reconstruction to four lanes, including drainage, utilities, large and small mammal 76 91 5 Southwest US 550 South: Gap crossings, and intersection improvements. Project is scalable to a two lane roadway. 1 $ 31,700,000 $ 33,630,000 $ 33,630,000 $ -

FASTLANE - $12.3 M RPP Completion of the connection of US 550 to US FASTER Safety 160 at the Grandview Interchange. Phase 1 Surface Treatment US 550/US 160 provides 2 lane configuration. Phase 2 provides 77 92 5 Southwest Connection for additional 2 lanes. Project is scalable to $75 million. 1 $ 100,560,000 $ 108,360,000 $ 63,060,000 $ 45,300,000 TOTAL - TIER I $ 6,178,440,000 $ 6,741,080,000 $ 6,016,980,000 $ 724,100,000

Attachment B: Development Plan - Tier I Page 9 10-Year Development Program Plan - Highway Projects DRAFT UPDATE - OCTOBER 17, 2017 TIER II PROJECTS

A B C D E F G H I J K L M Project Summary Updated Funding Need/Total Project Costs

Greater Denver I-25: Valley Highway Relocation of railroad and widening of 1 148 1 Area Phase 3.0 and 4.0 I-25 from Alameda to 6th Ave. 2 $ 72,000,000 $ 72,000,000 $ 72,000,000 $ - Construction of hook ramps on eastbound I-70 at 27th Ave. and I-70 Eastbound Hook pedestrian bridge over I-70. Related to Greater Denver Ramps at 27th Ave. and planned (at the time) Cabela's 2 144 1 Area Ped Bridge development. 2 $ 20,000,000 $ 20,000,000 $ 20,000,000 $ - Improvements to I-70 westbound at Greater Denver I-70 Westbound Ward Rd. Related to planned (at the 3 145 1 Area To/From Ward Rd. time) Cabela's development. 2 $ 15,000,000 $ 15,000,000 $ 15,000,000 $ - Phase II of the Central 70 project. Greater Denver I-70: Central 70 Quebec Widening from Quebec St. to Peoria 4 147 1 Area St. to Peoria St. St. 2 $ 160,000,000 $ 160,000,000 $ 160,000,000 $ - Phase II of the Central 70 project. I-70: Central 70 Peoria Widening from Peoria St. to Tower Rd. Greater Denver St. to Tower Rd. with direct connects to I-225 and Pena 5 146 1 Area (Segment 2) Blvd. 2 $ 270,000,000 $ 270,000,000 $ 270,000,000 $ -

EA and 30% design will be kicking off this winter (2017-2018). Presuming a 3 year EA, C-470 capacity and operational and DB procurement, the funds could be Greater Denver improvements from Kipling to I-70, committed by January 2021, and 6 149 1 Area C-470: Kipling to I-70 based on the outcomes of NEPA. construction commenced by July 2022. 2 $ 330,000,000 $ 330,000,000 $ 330,000,000 Construction of additional toll lane westbound from Colorado to Wadsworth and eastbound from Wadsworth to I-25, and two toll lanes Greater Denver from Wadsworth to Kipling in both 7 12 1 Area C-470: I-25 to Kipling directions. 2 $ 165,000,000 $ 165,000,000 $ 165,000,000 $ -

US 24 East: Elbert Rd. to Addition of turn and passing lanes on Central Front El Paso County Line Turn US 24 from Elbert Rd. to El Paso 8 101 2 Range and Passing Lanes County line. (MP 325.5-350.5) 2 $ 32,000,000 $ 32,000,000 $ 32,000,000 $ -

Central Front US 50: Salida to Canon Addition of passing lanes between 9 102 2 Range City Passing Lanes Salida and Canon City. (MP 223-277) 2 $ 25,000,000 $ 25,000,000 $ 25,000,000 $ - SH 9: Breckenridge to Addition of shoulders and safety Central Front Alma, Shoulders and improvements from Breckenridge to 10 103 2 Range Safety Improvements Alma. (MP 71-86) 2 $ 18,000,000 $ 18,000,000 $ 18,000,000 $ -

SH 115 Widening and Passing Lanes, Shoulder Addition of passing lanes, shoulders, Central Front and Intersection and improved bicycle and pedestrian 11 139 2 Range improvements safety at intersections. (MP 0-8) 2 $ 10,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ - Eight Lane HOV expansion on I-25 between Lake/Circle and Briargate. Widening of overpasses. (MP 137.5- 12 126 2 Pikes Peak Area I-25: HOV Lanes 152.0) 2 $ 65,000,000 $ 65,000,000 $ 65,000,000 $ - Widening from Milton E. Proby Pkwy. to East Fountain Blvd. (MP 137.6 - 13 26 2 Pikes Peak Area SH 21: Widening 139.5) 2 $ 13,000,000 $ 13,000,000 $ 13,000,000 $ -

Attachment B: Development Plan - Tier II Page 1 A B C D E F G H I J K L M Project Summary Updated Funding Need/Total Project Costs

Total Project Cost Updated Other Funding Line Project ID Region TPR Project Name Project Description Cost Estimate Details Phasing Tier Total Project Cost (Escalated) Funding Need Other Funding Assumptions Reconstruction of SH 21 (Powers Blvd.) to a six to eight lane freeway including construction of 11 interchanges and three overpasses between Milton E. Proby Pkwy. and Dublin Blvd. (MP 14 131 2 Pikes Peak Area SH 21: Central Freeway 137.5-148.0) 2 $ 780,350,000 $ 780,350,000 $ 780,350,000 $ - Construction of SH 21 (Powers Blvd.) Woodmen Rd. to SH 83 from a four SH 21: North Expansion lane freeway to a six lane freeway. 15 130 2 Pikes Peak Area Woodmen Rd. to SH 83 (MP 149.0 - 153.8) 2 $ 30,000,000 $ 30,000,000 $ 30,000,000 $ - Construction of SH 21 (Powers Blvd.) from SH 83 to I-25 as a six lane freeway including four interchanges at SH 83, Flying Horse Club Drive, SH 21: North Expansion Voyager Parkway and I-25. (MP 153.8- 16 129 2 Pikes Peak Area SH 83 to I-25 156.9) 2 $ 145,000,000 $ 145,000,000 $ 145,000,000 $ - Expand US 24 from I-25 to Ridge Road. US 24 West Includes the US 24/I-25 Flyover. (MP 17 127 2 Pikes Peak Area Improvements 299.7-303.7) 2 $ 270,000,000 $ 270,000,000 $ 270,000,000 $ -

SH 330: Safety Safety improvements including 18 136 3 Grand Valley Improvements adding/widening paved shoulders. 2 $ 20,000,000 $ 20,000,000 $ 20,000,000 $ - Upgrade of current 4-way stop with a I-70: Garfield County roundabout concluded to be Interchange necessary from a recently completed 19 32 3 Intermountain Improvements (Silt) corridor study for I-70. 2 $ 15,000,000.00 $ 15,000,000.00 $ 15,000,000 $ -

Mobility improvements in Glenwood Springs, completion of entrance to Aspen, expansion of transit, bicycle SH 82: Safety and pedestrian mobility, and improved 20 48 3 Intermountain Improvements wildlife mitigation. 2 $ 100,000,000 $ 100,000,000 $ 100,000,000 $ - Safety, capacity, and pedestrian crossing improvements, including traffic calming, curb and gutter, and 21 40 3 Intermountain US 24: Minturn road platform adjustment. 2 $ 13,000,000.00 $ 13,000,000.00 $ 13,000,000 $ - Widening of roadway and addition of US 40: Steamboat intersection turn lanes and dedicated 22 42 3 Northwest Springs to Steamboat II bus lane. 2 $ 28,000,000.00 $ 28,000,000 $ 28,000,000 $ - Widening, safety, intersection, SH7 Corridor bike/ped, BRT improvements as Improvements including outlined in the SH 7 PEL from Boulder 23 143 4 Greater Denver BRT to Brighton. 2 $ - $ - $ - $ - SH 42: Safety and Devolution, safety and intersection Greater Denver Intersection improvements in Louisville and 24 141 4 Area improvements Lafayette. 2 $ 10,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ -

Greater Denver SH 86: I-25 Castle Rock Surface treatment and intersection 25 73 4 Area, Eastern East to I-70 improvements. 2 $ 35,000,000 $ 35,000,000 $ 35,000,000 $ - US 34: Widening, Widening of roadway from four to six Interchanges, and lanes, construction of three Project could be divided into phases: North Front Operational interchanges, and operational MP 93.5 - 97.8 Widening ~$25 M 26 57 4 Range Improvements improvements. MP 97.8 - 113.65 Widening ~$170 M 2 $ 195,000,000 $ 195,000,000 $ 195,000,000 $ -

North Front US 287: Widening Fort Widening of roadway from four to six 27 61 4 Range Collins lanes. 2 $ 25,000,000 $ 25,000,000 $ 25,000,000 $ -

Attachment B: Development Plan - Tier II Page 2 A B C D E F G H I J K L M Project Summary Updated Funding Need/Total Project Costs

North Front US 287: SH 14—Ted’s 28 62 4 Range Place Intersection improvements. 2 $ 1,600,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 1,600,000 $ -

North Front SH 14: Widening I-25 to Widening of roadway from four to six 29 67 4 Range Riverside lanes. 2 $ 30,000,000 $ 30,000,000 $ 30,000,000 $ - SH 402: Widening, North Front Intersection and Safety Widening, safety, and intersection 30 77 4 Range Improvements improvements. 2 $ 45,000,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 45,000,000 $ -

Upper Front US 34/US 36 Intersection 31 55 4 Range in Estes Park Intersection improvements. 2 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ - Mobility improvements including Upper Front US 36: Estes Park to widening, and construction of passing 32 59 4 Range Boulder County Line lanes and pullouts. 2 $ 8,000,000 $ 8,000,000 $ 8,000,000 $ - Upper Front Range, North US 287: Ted’s Place to Construction of passing lanes and 33 63 4 Front Range Wyoming Border other safety improvements. 2 $ 20,000,000 $ 20,000,000 $ 20,000,000 $ -

Upper Front US 287: CR 72 (Owl 34 64 4 Range Canyon Road) Intersection improvements. 2 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ -

Upper Front 35 65 4 Range US 287: LCR 80C (West) Intersection improvements. 2 $ 0.6 $ 0.6 $ 0.6 $ - Upper Front Range, Greater Denver SH 52: SH 119 to US 85 Widening, safety, and intersection 36 68 4 Area Corridor Improvements improvements. 2 $ 80,000,000 $ 80,000,000 $ 80,000,000 $ - Upper Front Range, Greater Denver SH 66: Corridor 37 71 4 Area Improvements East Safety and intersection improvements. 2 $ 50,000,000 $ 50,000,000 $ 50,000,000 $ - Upper Front Range, North Front SH 392: Corridor Widening, safety, and intersection 38 76 4 Range Improvements improvements. 2 $ 110,000,000 $ 110,000,000 $ 110,000,000 $ - Surface Treatment - US 550: Ridgway to $9 M Ouray Shoulder Shoulder widening between Ridgway FASTER Safety - 39 93 5 Gunnison Valley Widening and Ouray. The project is highly scalable. 2 $ 15,000,000 $ 15,000,000 $ 7,950,000 $ 7,050,000 $1.15 M SH 145: Safety and Mobility Improvements Surface Treatment - between Sawpit and $6.5 M Keystone Hill (Shoulder Shoulder widening and/or addition of RPP - $5 M Widening and/or Passing passing lane between Sawpit and FASTER SAFETY - 40 97 5 Gunnison Valley Lanes) Keystone Hill. Scalable with limited surface treatment. 2 $ 12,195,000 $ 12,926,700 $ 731,700 $ 12,195,000 $695K

US 24: Safety and Mobility Improvements Shoulder widening/bike facilities and on Trout Creek Pass- addition of passing lanes and bike 41 78 5 San Luis Valley Phase II facilities on Trout Creek Pass. Not scalable. 2 $ 8,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ -

Attachment B: Development Plan - Tier II Page 3 A B C D E F G H I J K L M Project Summary Updated Funding Need/Total Project Costs

Total Project Cost Updated Other Funding Line Project ID Region TPR Project Name Project Description Cost Estimate Details Phasing Tier Total Project Cost (Escalated) Funding Need Other Funding Assumptions Addition of passing opportunities, mobility and safety improvements including shoulder widening, curve corrections, rock excavation and US 160: Wolf Creek Pass rockfall protection, chain station East Mobility and Safety reconstruction, and fiber optic The project is highly scalable, with three 42 85 5 San Luis Valley Improvements backbone installation. distinct sections. 2 $ 70,420,000 $ 70,420,000 $ 70,420,000 $ -

Improvements to Rio Grande bridge, realignment of roadway, and addition of bike and pedestrian facilities in 43 86 5 San Luis Valley US 160: Alamosa Alamosa (4th Street to SH 17). Scalable. 2 $ 10,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ -

Construction of an alternating passing lane in both directions and the US160 Trinchera Safety installtion of two wildlife crossing Phasing possible. Wildlife crossing 44 152 5 San Luis Valley Mitigation structures along with wildlife fencing. structures could be phased. 2 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,600,000 $ 5,600,000 $ - $ -

US 285: Safety and Mobility Improvements between Center to Saguache (Widen Shoulder widening from Center to 45 88 5 San Luis Valley Shoulders) Saguache. This project is highly scalable. 2 $ 23,000,000 $ 23,000,000 $ 20,200,000 $ 2,800,000 Surface Treatment

US 160: Reconstruction Full depth reconstruction of the and Shoulder Widening existing paved surface and shoulder 46 80 5 Southwest MP 0 to MP 8 widening. Not scalable. 2 $ 16,000,000 $ 16,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 6,000,000 Surface Treatment Addition of two eastbound lanes making it a divided 4-lane highway, with two new structures on mainline in each direction and realingment of US 160: Dry Creek CR 223. The project also includes Passing and Mobility shoulder widening and access Scalable, smaller projects could be 47 83 5 Southwest Improvements consolidation. completed over time 2 $ 36,400,000 $ 38,584,000 $ 38,584,000 $ -

Construction of an alternating passing lane in both directions and the US 160/SH151 Safety installtion of two wildlife crossing Phasing possible. Wildlife crossing 48 151 5 Southwest Mitigation structures along with wildlife fencing. structures could be phased. 2 $ 8,000,000 $ 8,960,000 $ 7,760,000 $ 1,200,000 Southern Ute Tribe

Extend Irrig Cross Culv 15' both sides, design conc channel with lateral Not scalable due to size. Note: CDOT not spillway, stilling basin and low flow constructing, only design & const. 49 150 5 Southewest US 491 Ute Farms Ditch channel at Talk Rd reimbursement to UMUT. 2 $ 422,510 $ 422,510 $ 422,510

SH 140: New Mexico Widen shoulders and Not scalable - there are 3 bridges that need 50 96 5 Southwest State Line to Hesperus rehab/reconstruct three bridges. widening 2 $ 10,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ - TOTAL - TIER II $ 3,424,387,511 $ 3,430,863,211 $ 3,401,618,211 $ 29,245,000

Attachment B: Development Plan - Tier II Page 4 10-Year Development Program Plan - Highway Projects DRAFT UPDATE - OCTOBER 17, 2017 TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIONS, AND OTHER NEEDS

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Project Summary Updated Funding Need/Total Project Costs

$160M addresses strategic needs in the Technology Construction of fiber optics, short term, including full interstate fiber Corridor selection and prioritization Infrastructure Expansion Connected Vehilce infrastructure, and optic coverage, a robust Connected Vehicle P3s will be is ongoing with the Regions and the Statewide: I-70, I-25, I- other technologies to support smart Network, and 25% fiber coverage statewide considered on these Smart Mobility Plan will further 76, US 285, US 160, and signals, traffic operations, winter (currently 17%), but a larger build out to projects and could develop technology projects and other signalized operations, and a robust Connected achieve close to 50% fiber coverage and potentially mitigate prioritization over the next 12 1 Statewide corridors. Vehicle Network. deploy additional technologies is $700M. $ 160,000,000 costs. months. 2 Statewide ADA Improvements $ 56,000,000

TOTAL - OTHER $ 216,000,000 $ - $ - $ -

Attachment B: Development Plan - Tier II Page 5 Resolution #TC-17-XX-XX Instructing the Colorado Department of Transportation to dedicate revenue received through Senate Bill 17-267 towards the approved project list enclosed. Approved by the Transportation Commission on (Insert Date) WHEREAS, Colorado Senate Bill 17-267 generates an estimated $1.88 billion for transportation projects through lease purchase agreements and provides the Colorado Transportation Commission the authority to designate and select projects for this purpose; and WHEREAS, at least 25 percent of transportation funds must be spent in counties with fewer than 50,000 residents as of July 2015; and WHEREAS, at least 10 percent of transportation funds must be spent on transit projects; and WHEREAS, the Colorado Transportation Commission developed criteria for project selection in conjunction with applicable stakeholders and selected projects from the Development Program; and

WHEREAS, the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) staff evaluated and analyzed potential projects for the Department consistent with the aforementioned criteria; and WHEREAS, the projects selected below meet or exceed the 25% minimum for counties with fewer than 50,000 residents as of July 2015. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Colorado Transportation Commission approves the following list transportation projects for the Fiscal Years 18-19 and 19-20 of Senate Bill 17- 267 funding in accordance with stipulations provided within the law.  US 50: Little Blue Canyon - $9,500,000  US 550/160: Connection - $54,400,000  I-25 Colorado-Springs Denver South - $250,000,000  I-25: North SH 402 – SH 56 (Segment 6) - $200,000,000  I-70: Westbound PPSL - $80,000,000  SH 13 Reconstruction - $60,000,000  US 160: Towaoc Passing Lanes - $9,000,000  US 50 West of Pueblo - $35,520,000  SH 9: Frisco North - $10,250,000  I-70 East: Failing Pavement - $55,000,000  ADA Improvements - $25,000,000

NOW THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Colorado Transportation Commission will revisit the aforementioned projects, and project amounts, following the announcement of the TIGER IX and INFRA discretionary grant awards, and as a result may modify project list and/or project amounts.

Attachment C: Resolution Option 1 ______Herman Stockinger, Secretary Date Transportation Commission

Attachment C: Resolution Option 1 Resolution #TC-17-XX-XX Instructing the Department to dedicate revenue received through Senate Bill 17-267 towards the US 550/160 FASTLANE project. Approved by the Transportation Commission on (Insert Date) WHEREAS, Colorado Senate Bill 17-267 generates an estimated $1.88 billion for transportation projects through lease purchase agreements and provides the Colorado Transportation Commission the authority to designate and select projects for this purpose; and WHEREAS, the Colorado Department of Transportation received a federal FASTLANE Small Project grant award totaling $12,312,886 for the US 550/160 project; and WHEREAS, in an effort to maximize the investment for the US 550/160 project the Colorado Transportation Commission is dedicating $54.4 million of the Fiscal Years 18-19 and 19-20 Senate Bill 17-267 funding towards the completion of the project; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, in order to show the Department’s financial commitment to the US 550/160 FASTLANE project, the Colorado Transportation Commission dedicates $54.4 million of the Fiscal Years 18-19 and 19-20 Senate Bill 17-267 funding towards the completion of the project

______Herman Stockinger, Secretary Date Transportation Commission

Attachment C: Resolution Option 2 Region Director’s Office 3803 N. Main Avenue, Suite 306 Durango, CO 81301

MEMORANDUM DATE: November 2, 2017 TO: Transportation Commission CC: Josh Laipply, Chief Engineer Jeff Sudemier, Chief Financial Officer Debra Perkins-Smith, DTD FROM: Michael D. Mcvaugh, Region 5 Transportation Director

SUBJECT: US 160/US 550 Connection Fastlane Project Revised Budget Request

Purpose Region 5 is requesting approval to use $54.4 million of Senate Bill 267 (SB 267) funding to complete the construction of the US 160/US 550 Connection FASTLANE Project in accordance with the Department’s project delivery expectations. This submital is a revision to the original budget request by Region 5 on September 8, 2017. The revised budget request accounts for recent written financial commitments Region 5 has received from several local government agencies and private entities in the Durango and La Plata County area.

Action Staff is requesting Transportation Commission (TC) resolution approval to budget a total of $54.4 million for the US 160/US 550 Connection FASTLANE Project using future SB 267 funding. This FASTLANE project is the Region’s highest priority project and was identified as the top priority in the 2016 Planning process by the Region’s three Transportation Planning Regions.

Background The US 160/US 550 Connection FASTLANE Project is part of CDOT’s long-range planning effort to enhance safety and mobility for the entire area of southwest Colorado. Since US 160 and US 550 were identified as critical highway corridors in the Strategic Transportation Project Investment Program 19 years ago, there has been continued support for the needed improvements to these corridors at the state and local level. In partnership with CDOT Region 5, La Plata County submitted a FASTLANE Grant application (small project <$100m) in December of 2016. As part of the application process, the Transportation Commission passed resolution #TC-16-12-3 on December 7, 2016 to support the FASTLANE grant proposals and provide a minimum of $27 million in SB 228 match funds. This supplements $33 million already committed by the Region for this project.

The 2017 FASTLANE grant application requested $15 million in FASTLANE funding. In July the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) proposed 10 FASTLANE Small Project grant awards totaling $78.88 million to the authorizing committees of jurisdiction for a 60-day congressional review period. In October, Congress approved the small grant awards. Of these projects, the US 160/US 550 Connection was selected for the largest award nationally of $12,312,886 in this grant cycle.

Attachment D: US 160/US 550 Connection Fastlane Project Revised Budget Request Page 1 On October 31st, 2017, CDOT received financial commitment letters from the City of Durango, La Plata County, the Southern Ute Indian Tribe, and the Southern Ute Indian Tribe Growth Fund (private entity). The City of Durango and La Plata County have committed $250 thousand dollars each, and the Southern Ute Indian Growth Fund has also committed $500 thousand dollars to the project. This provides a total financial cash commitment of $1 million dollars. The Southern Ute Indian Tribe also agreed to waive the standard 2% TERO fee that would be applied to CDOT projects that directly serve tribal lands. Waiving the 2% TERO fee will save CDOT approximatley $1.98 million dollars on the project. The cash commitments and TERO fee waiver will save CDOT at least $2.98 millon dollars. Additionally, The City of Durango and La Plata County will be working jointly to submit a $1 to $2 million dollar grant request to the Department of Local Affairs (DOLA) for this project. This would increase the local financial commitment for this project up to $4.98 million dollars. If a DOLA grant is awarded to the city and county, Region 5 will return the additional funding to the transportation commission for redistribution to other SB 267 projects. The local financial commitments are specifically to offset the increased funding needed for Option 3: FULL BUILD WITH 4-LANE described below.

Details The Region is presenting four funding options to the Transportation Commission, ranging from no funding to $54.4 million.

Option 1: BASE BUILD In order to keep the grant application in the small project category, Region 5 proposed a reduced section of the ultimate design for the highway connection. The $75 million project cost identified in the FASTLANE grant would construct three lanes of the planned 4-lane facility for 1.7 miles. The reduced section includes two through-lanes and a climbing lane for trucks providing significant freight and safety benefits. In order to complete the proposed $75 million FASTLANE project, the project will require $32.7 million in SB 267 funds.

Option 2: 4-LANE WITH FILL Additional funds are being requested to complete the full-build out of the US 160/US 550 Connection and to couple this effort with planned work on the northern segment of US 550 (US 550 CR 302 North Project). This funding option allows for the construction of the full 4-lane connection of US 160 and US 550, providing a full-movement interchange that greatly improves safety and mobility at the US 550/US 160 intersection, and numerous grade-separated wildlife crossings and fencing aimed at reducing the high rate of animal-vehicle collisions along US 550.

Extending the project funding and scope south on US 550 provides the highest value to CDOT and the traveling public through coordinated project phasing, providing essential highway transitioning from a rural to an urban setting, helping to balance required cuts and fills, and addressing the corridor’s worst safety deficiencies. This additional work on US 550 provides a disposal area to utilize the 1.8 million cubic yards of excavation the FASTLANE project will produce, saving millions in future project costs to import earthwork required for these segments. Costs to complete this additional work would require an additional $12.2 million of SB 267 funds and require a total of $44.9 million in SB-267 funds for a total project cost of $87.2 million.

Option 3: FULL BUILD WITH 4-LANE (Staff Recommendation) The Region is proposing to utilize a Design-Build delivery method to provide the best opportunity to maximize the scope through the use of Additional Requested Elements (ARE), improvements that are desired but not included in the base project, which support the preliminary project goals including improving safety throughout the corridor and minimizing impacts to the traveling public and stakeholders. This delivery method also accelerates the project delivery schedule allowing the Region to begin construction up to a year earlier than what could be accomplished under the Option 1 scenario. This funding option would construct 4.1 miles of highway in the final 4-lane configuration. To capitalize on the value of innovative contracting and to limit impacts to the traveling public, the Region is requesting a total of $54.4 million of SB 267 funds to complete the final 4-lane configuration throughout the 4.1 mile corridor. This also includes at least $2.98 million of local financial commitments for this option, for a total project cost of $99.6 million.

Attachment D: US 160/US 550 Connection Fastlane Project Revised Budget Request Page 2 Key Benefits Approving the funds for this request will allow the Region to meet the commitments set forth in our 2016 FASTLANE grant application. Additionally, expanding the scope of the FASTLANE project to efficiently utilize the fill generated from the project will increase interest by bidders, increase the contractor innovations, and save CDOT up to $20 million in future earthwork and construction costs to build this separately, while reducing long term construction impacts and providing a higher level of operation and safety to the traveling public along this corridor.

Options 1. Approve $32.7 million in future SB 267 funds to allow for the completion of the 2016 FASTLANE grant award commitment, total project cost $75 million. 2. Approve $48.7 million in future SB 267 funds to allow for the completion of the 4-lane ultimate design for the US 160/US 550 Connection (1.7 miles), total project cost $91 million. 3. Approve Region 5’s request for $54.4 million of future SB 267 funds with at least $2.98 million in local commitments for a total project cost of $99.6 million. Staff Recommendation. 4. Decline the request for future SB 267 funding and return the FASTLANE grant award to USDOT.

Next Steps Upon approval of the funding request, the Region will finalize the development of the Design Build Request for Proposal (RFP) to be advertised for solicitations by December 2018.

Attachment D: US 160/US 550 Connection Fastlane Project Revised Budget Request Page 3