Interbrew Plc

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Interbrew Plc INTERBREW PLC 23.04.2020 LEFKOSIA, CYPRUS ANNOUNCEMENT Re: Interbrew Plc - Approval and publication of the Annual Financial Report for the financial year ended 31 December 2019 The Board of Directors of Interbrew Plc (the “Company”) has today approved the Annual Financial Report of the Company for the financial year that ended on 31 December 2019, which was prepared in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Transparency Requirements (Securities Admitted to Trading on a Regulated Market) Laws of 2007 as amended, of the Republic of Cyprus. The Annual Financial Report includes the final, audited financial statements of the Group (consolidated) and of the Company (separate) for 2019, the Management Report and the Independent Auditors’ Report. The Annual Financial Report is hereby attached. Further, it will be uploaded on the Company’s website (www.interbrewplc.com) from where it may be accessed and printed, and will be published and made available according to the applicable Transparency legislation and stock exchange rules. The Board of Directors further decided that the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholders of the Company will take place at 11:00 am local time, on the 22 June, 2020, at the registered office of the Company at 1 Lampousas street, 1095, Nicosia, Cyprus. The shareholders will be notified pursuant to the applicable company legislation provisions. Interbrew Plc contact: Denis Khrenov – Chief Executive Officer Tel : +380 44 201 4087 Email: [email protected] NAP Regulatory Compliance Services Ltd Regulatory Compliance Officer for the Company Tel: +357 22 554 343 Fax: +357 22 554 455 Email: [email protected] CC: Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission Interbrew Plc Annual Report and Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2019 INTERBREW PLC TABLE OF CONTENTS Page BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND OTHER OFFICERS 2 STATEMENT BY THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND OTHER RESPONSIBLE OFFICERS OF THE GROUP FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE NON-AUDITED INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 3 CONSOLIDATED MANAGEMENT REPORT 4-13 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT 14-20 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2019: Consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income 21 Consolidated statement of financial position 22 Consolidated statement of changes in equity 23 Consolidated statement of cash flows 24 Notes to the consolidated financial statements 25 1. BACKGROUND 25 2. BASIS OF PREPARATION 26 3. APPLICATION OF NEW STANDARDS, INTERPRETATIONS AND AMENDMENTS OF EXISTING STANDARDS 27 4. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES 28 5. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS 41 6. OPERATING SEGMENTS 42 7. GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES 42 8. OTHER OPERATING INCOME 43 9. FINANCE INCOME AND FINANCE COSTS 43 10. INCOME TAX EXPENSE 43 11. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT 43 12. INTANGIBLE ASSETS 44 13. INVENTORIES 45 14. OTHER RECEIVABLES 45 15. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 46 16. CAPITAL AND RESERVES 46 17. LOSS PER SHARE 48 18. LOANS AND BORROWINGS 49 19. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES 49 20. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RISK MANAGEMENT 49 21. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS 55 22. CONTINGENCIES 56 23. DISPOSAL OF SUBSIDIARIES 56 24. EVENTS AFTER THE REPORTING DATE 58 INTERBREW PLC BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND OTHER OFFICERS Board of Directors Denis Khrenov – Chairman of the Board, Director and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) Alexander Balakhnov - Director and Chief Legal Officer and member of Nominations and Remuneration Committee (“CLO”) Dmytro Shpakov - Director Inter Jura CY (Directors) Limited – Director and member of Nominations and Remuneration Committee Inter Jura CY (Management) Limited – Director Costas Melanides – Independent, non-executive Director and member of the Audit Committee Marios Chrysanthou – Independent, non-executive Director and Chairman of the Audit Committee Yuliia Ponomarenko - Director and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) (Appointed on 28 February 2019) Yevhenii Vizhul – Director and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) (Resigned on 28 February 2019) Olga Romanova – Director (appointed 12 December 2019) Company Secretary Inter Jura CY (Services) Limited 1 Lampousa Street CY-1095 Nicosia Cyprus Registered office 1 Lampousa Street CY-1095 Nicosia Cyprus Registration number: ΗΕ277915 2 INTERBREW PLC CONSOLIDATED MANAGEMENT REPORT 1. The Board of Directors presents its consolidated management report together with the audited consolidated financial statements of Interbrew Plc (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries (collectively the “Group”) for the year ended 31 December 2019. During 2019, the Company changed its name from “Sun Interbrew Plc” to “Interbrew Plc”. Principal activities and departure from the going concern basis 2. On 23 March 2018, the Group disposed its ownership interests in its significant subsidiaries in Russia and Ukraine to a related party. Following this date, the Group engaged only to investment holding activities. The Consolidated Financial Statements were prepared on a non-going concern basis since management considers the option and feasibility to cease activities. For more information refer to Note 2. During the year, the following changes to the group structure took place: On 14 January of 2019, the Group liquidated SUN INTERBREW FINANCE LLC. Following the disposal transaction and dividend distribution from subsidiary with direct shareholding in the Russian Subsidiary, the management initiated the process for the liquidation of its remaining subsidiary companies. Review of developments, position and performance of the Group's business 3. The loss of the Group for the year ended 31 December 2019 was EUR 3,086 thousand (2018: EUR 519,590 thousand profit). The significant differentiation in the year-to-year results was caused by the disposal of the Group’s significant subsidiaries on 23 March 2018 which resulted to a gain on disposal of EUR 564,487 thousand (Note 23) and hence, during 2019, the Group did not have any income but rather administrative expenses and financial costs. Other Comprehensive Income for the year ended 31 December 2019 was EUR Nil (2018: EUR 267,400 thousand). The overall positive impact on 2018 resulted from the disposal of the significant subsidiaries of the Group where the accumulated loss previously recognised in the consolidated financial statements was recycled back in other comprehensive income for the year ended December 2018. In 2018 this effect was recycled from Other Comprehensive Income and the Group recognises all its gains and losses in the Income Statement after relinquishing control over its previous subsidiaries in 2018. On 31 December 2019 the total assets of the Group were EUR 855,445 thousand (2018: EUR 856,261 thousand) and the net assets were EUR 792,208 thousand (2018: EUR 795,443 thousand). The Group did not carry out any research and development activities during 2019. Principal Risks and Uncertainties 4. The principal risks and uncertainties faced by the Group were associated with the respective businesses principally involved in the manufacturing, distribution, marketing and sale of Beer in Russia and Ukraine up until March 2018 when the Group’s operating subsidiaries were disposed. The risks and uncertainties faced by the Group following the disposal of its operating subsidiaries are disclosed in Notes 2, 20 and 22. Coronavirus: The Group, pursuant to a relevant Circular of its regulatory authority Cyprus Securities & Exchange Commission asking from issuers to assess the potential financial impact that a possible spread of Coronavirus may have on their business/operations and make a relevant announcement, released an announcement in March 2020, informing the investing public the following: 4 INTERBREW PLC CONSOLIDATED MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONTINUED) “In March 2018, the Group disposed its ownership interests in its significant, operating subsidiaries in Russia and Ukraine. Following this, and up-to-date, the Company Group engaged only in investment holding activities. The Company does not foresee any material financial impact to its business from a possible spread of Coronavirus.” On the date of the approval of the Annual Financial Report 2019, this position remains the same. Use of financial instruments by the Group 5. The Group is exposed to a variety of financial risks: market risk (including currency risk and interest rate risk), credit risk and liquidity risk. The detailed analysis of the Group’s exposure to financial risks as at the reporting date are disclosed in Note 20 of the consolidated financial statements. Future developments of the Group 6. The management of the Group currently considers the option and feasibility to cease the activities of the Group and distribute the cash held by the Group to its shareholders (possibly through a liquidation of the Company and its subsidiaries) and to seek a delisting of the shares/GDRs of the Group from the Luxembourg Stock Exchange. Results 7. The Group's results for the year are set out on page 21 of the consolidated financial statements. Dividends The Board of Directors has not made decision for the payment of dividend. The Board of Directors may at a later stage consider the payment of interim dividends out of retained earnings, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Companies Laws and the Articles of Association of the Company. Share capital 8. The authorised share capital which amounts to GBP 1,552,786 is divided into 125,278,614 class A shares of GBP 0.01 each and 30,000,000 class B shares of GBP 0.01 each. 9. The current number of
Recommended publications
  • Big Beer Duopoly a Primer for Policymakers and Regulators
    Big Beer Duopoly A Primer for Policymakers and Regulators Marin Institute Report October 2009 Marin Institute Big Beer Duopoly A Primer for Policymakers and Regulators Executive Summary While the U.S. beer industry has been consolidating at a rapid pace for years, 2008 saw the most dramatic changes in industry history to date. With the creation of two new global corporate entities, Anheuser-Busch InBev (ABI) and MillerCoors, how beer is marketed and sold in this country will never be the same. Anheuser-Busch InBev is based in Belgium and largely supported and managed by Brazilian leadership, while MillerCoors is majority-controlled by SABMiller out of London. It is critical for federal and state policymakers, as well as alcohol regulators and control advocates to understand these changes and anticipate forthcoming challenges from this new duopoly. This report describes the two industry players who now control 80 percent of the U.S. beer market, and offers responses to new policy challenges that are likely to negatively impact public health and safety. The new beer duopoly brings tremendous power to ABI and MillerCoors: power that impacts Congress, the Office of the President, federal agencies, and state lawmakers and regulators. Summary of Findings • Beer industry consolidation has resulted in the concentration of corporate power and beer market control in the hands of two beer giants, Anheuser-Busch InBev (ABI) and MillerCoors LLC. • The American beer industry is no longer American. Eighty percent of the U.S. beer industry is controlled by one corporation based in Belgium, and another based in England. • The mergers of ABI and MillerCoors occurred within months of each other, and both were approved much quicker than the usual merger process.
    [Show full text]
  • Inbev and Anheuser-Busch
    A09-10-0015 Andrew Inkpen InBev and Anheuser-Busch In early June 2008, Belgian-based InBev NV launched an unsolicited $46.4 billion bid to acquire Anheuser- Busch Co., owner of the 132-year-old Budweiser brand. The combination would create the world’s largest brewer, with sales of about $36 billion annually. Carlos Brito, CEO of InBev, said that the deal “will create a stronger, more competitive, sustainable global company which will benefit all stakeholders.”1 The initial response from Anheuser was noncommittal, stating that the company “will pursue the course of action that is in the best interests of Anheuser-Busch’s stockholders.” On June 26, Anheuser’s board formally rejected InBev’s original proposal of $65 a share, saying it substantially undervalued the company. The board indicated that it would be open to a higher price. In mid-July, InBev raised its offer to $70 a share, and the Anheuser board voted to accept the deal, recogniz- ing that a better offer was unlikely. The $70 price represented a substantial premium for Anheuser shareholders. InBev management would now have to prove to their shareholders that the premium was justified. The Brewing Industry The basic beer brewing process is quite straightforward. Malted barley (malt) is the primary ingredient, although other grains such as unmalted barley, corn, rice, or wheat can also be used. Yeast, hops, and water are the other main ingredients. The most challenging aspects of industrial-scale brewing are maintaining quality control across large volumes, multiple products, and different production sites, and ensuring that costs are closely managed.
    [Show full text]
  • Mit Scale Research Report
    MIT SCALE RESEARCH REPORT The MIT Global Supply Chain and Logistics Excellence (SCALE) Network is an international alliance of leading-edge research and education centers, dedicated to the development and dissemination of global innovation in supply chain and logistics. The Global SCALE Network allows faculty, researchers, students, and affiliated companies from all six centers around the world to pool their expertise and collaborate on projects that will create supply chain and logistics innovations with global applications. This reprint is intended to communicate research results of innovative supply chain research completed by faculty, researchers, and students of the Global SCALE Network, thereby contributing to the greater public knowledge about supply chains. For more information, contact MIT Global SCALE Network Postal Address: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139 (USA) Location: Building E40, Room 267 1 Amherst St. Access: Tel: +1 617-253-5320 Fax: +1 617-253-4560 Email: [email protected] Website: scale.mit.edu Research Report: ZLC-2005-5 Analysis of Supply Chains in the Consumer Packaged Goods Industry Mark Finkelstein MIT Global Scale Network For Full Thesis Version Please Contact: Marta Romero ZLOG Director Zaragoza Logistics Center (ZLC) Edificio Náyade 5, C/Bari 55 – PLAZA 50197 Zaragoza, SPAIN Email: [email protected] Telephone: +34 976 077 605 MIT Global Scale Network Analysis of Supply Chains in the Consumer Packaged Goods Industry Mark Finkelstein Executive Summary The following paper presents a case study on InBev, the product of the 2003 merger between beverage giants Interbrew of Belgium and AmBev of Brazil, to contribute to the IT Supply Chain 2020 (SC2020) Project on supply chain excellence in the year 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • 21Nov200819011210
    21NOV200819011210 ANHEUSER-BUSCH INBEV SA/NV (a public limited liability company with registered office at Grand-Place/Grote Markt 1, 1000 Brussels, Belgium) BRANDBREW S.A. (a company incorporated under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg with registered office at 5, Parc d’Activit´e Syrdall, L-5365 Munsbach,¨ registered with the Luxembourg Register of Commerce and Companies under number B-75696) as Issuers on the basis set out below E10,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed by AMBREW S.A. (a soci´et´e anonyme with registered office at 5, Parc d’Activit´e Syrdall, L-5365 Munsbach,¨ registered with the Luxembourg Register of Commerce and Companies under number B-99525) ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES, INC. (a company incorporated in the State of Delaware with registered office at 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801) ANHEUSER-BUSCH INBEV SA/NV (a public limited liability company with registered office at Grand-Place/Grote Markt 1, 1000 Brussels, Belgium) ANHEUSER-BUSCH INBEV WORLDWIDE INC. (a company incorporated in the State of Delaware with registered office at 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801) BRANDBREW S.A. (a company incorporated under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg with registered office at 5, Parc d’Activit´e Syrdall, L-5365 Munsbach,¨ registered with the Luxembourg Register of Commerce and Companies under number B-75696) COBREW NV/SA (a Belgian public limited liability company with registered office at Brouwerijplein 1, 3000 Leuven, Belgium) INBEV BELGIUM NV/SA (a Belgian public limited liability company with registered office at 21, Boulevard Industriel, 1070 Brussels (Anderlecht)) INBEV FRANCE S.A.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Case No COMP/M.2044 Œ INTERBREW / BASS REGULATION
    EN Case No COMP/M.2044 – INTERBREW / BASS Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 9 Date: 22/08/2000 COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 22.08.2000 SG (2000) D/ 106331 In the published version of this decision, some information has been omitted pursuant to Article PUBLIC VERSION 17(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 concerning non-disclosure of business secrets and other confidential information. The omissions are MERGER PROCEDURE shown thus […]. Where possible the information ARTICLE 9(4)(a) DECISION omitted has been replaced by ranges of figures or a general description. Decision relating to the referral of the case No COMP/M. 2044 Interbrew / Bass to the United Kingdom Competition Authorities, pursuant to Article 9 of Regulation 4064/89 THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No. 4064/89 of 21 December 1989, on the control of concentrations between undertakings1, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1310/97 of 30 June 19972 (together, ‘the Merger Regulation’), and in particular article 9(3)(b) thereof, Having regard to the notification made by Interbrew SA on 6 July 2000, pursuant to article 4 of the Merger Regulation, Having regard to the request of the United Kingdom Competition Authorities of 1 August 2000, 1 OJ L 395, 30.12.1989, p.1; corrected version OJ L 257, 21.9.1990, p.13 2 OJ L 180, 9.7.1997, p.1; corrigendum OJ L 40, 13.12.1998, p.17 Rue de la Loi 200, B-1049 Bruxelles/Wetstraat 200, B-1049 Brussel - Belgium Telephone: exchange 299.11.11 Telex: COMEU B 21877.
    [Show full text]
  • Original in the Supreme Court of Ohio
    ORIGINAL IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO Esber Beverage Company, On Appeal from the Stark County Court of Appeals, Appellant, Fifth Appellate District v. Court of Appeals Case Nos. 2011 CA00113 & Labatt USA Operating Company, LLC, et 2011 CA00116 al., 3 4^ Appellees. Ohio Supreme Court Case No. 1 ® 0 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF JURISDICTION OF APPELLANT ESBER BEVERAGE COMPANY Charles R. Saxbe (0021952) [email protected] Sarah D. Morrison (0068035), Counsel of Record smon•[email protected] TAFT STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER LLP 65 E. State Street, Suite 1000 Columbus, OH 43215-3413 (614) 221-2838/fax (614) 221-2007 Stephen W. Funk (0058506) sfimkpxalawa.com Roetzel & Andress, LPA 222 S. Main St., Suite 400 Akron, Ohio 44308 (330) 849-6602/fax (330) 376-4577 Lee E. Plakas (0008628) Gary A. Corroto (0055270) gcorrotona,lawlion.com Tzangas, Plakas, Mannos & Raies, Ltd. 220 Market Avenue South, Eighth Floor Canton, OH 44702 (330) 455-6112/fax (330) 455-2108 Stanley R. Rubin (0011671) MAY 3 'i 437 Market Avenue North CLERK OF COURT Canton, OH 44702 (330) 455-5206/fax (330) 455-5200 SUPREME COURT OF OHIO COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT, ESBER BEVERAGE COMPANY James B. Niehaus Jennifer L. Whitney Frantz Ward, LLP 2500 Key Tower, 127 Public Square Cleveland, OH 44114-1304 Paul J. Pusateri Milligan Pusateri Co., LPA 4684 Douglas Circle Canton, OH 44178 COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE LABATT USA OPERATING CO., LLC, KPS CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P., NORTH AMERICAN BREWERIES, INC. AND DOUG TOMLIN James L. Messenger Richard J. Thomas Jerry R. Krzys 6 Federal Plaza Central, Suite 1300 Youngstown, OH 44503 COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE SUPERIOR BEVERAGE GROUP, LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • Anheuser-Busch Inbev SA/NV Form SC 13D/A Filed
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM SC 13D/A Schedule filed to report acquisition of beneficial ownership of 5% or more of a class of equity securities [amend] Filing Date: 2021-06-16 SEC Accession No. 0001193125-21-192182 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) SUBJECT COMPANY Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV Mailing Address Business Address BROUWERIJPLEIN 1 BROUWERIJPLEIN 1 CIK:1668717| IRS No.: 000000000 | State of Incorp.:C9 | Fiscal Year End: 1231 LEUVEN C9 3000 LEUVEN C9 3000 Type: SC 13D/A | Act: 34 | File No.: 005-89670 | Film No.: 211022070 32(0)16276018 SIC: 2082 Malt beverages FILED BY BRC S.a.R.L. Mailing Address Business Address 73, COTE D'EICH 73, COTE D'EICH CIK:1301486| IRS No.: 000000000 | State of Incorp.:N4 | Fiscal Year End: 1231 LUXEMBOURG N4 L-1450 LUXEMBOURG N4 L-1450 Type: SC 13D/A 352-40-45-46 Copyright © 2021 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 SCHEDULE 13D Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. 1)* Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (Name of Issuer) Ordinary Shares, without par value American Depositary Shares, each of which represents 1 (one) Ordinary Share, without par value, evidenced by American Depositary Receipts (Title of Class or Securities) 03524A108 (CUSIP Number for American Depositary Shares) John Horsfield-Bradbury Erik Adam Mr. Roberto Moses Thompson Sullivan & Cromwell LLP Eugénie Patri Sébastien S.A. BRC S.à.R.L. 1 New Fetter Lane 488 Route de Longwy, L-1940, 2 Boulevard de la Foire, London EC4A 1AN Luxembourg L 1528 Luxembourg England + 352 27 02 39 +352 2704-86 84 21 +44 20 7959-8900 (Name, Address and Telephone Number of Person Authorized to Receive Notices and Communication) June 7, 2021 (Date of Event to Which This Filing Relates) If the filing person has previously filed a statement on Schedule 13G to report the acquisition that is the subject of this Schedule 13D, and is filing this schedule because of §§ 240.13d-1(e), 240.13d-1(f) or 240.13d-1(g), check the following box.
    [Show full text]
  • Tap Beer Bottled Beer
    wine beer Co-V Cocktails PINK LADY ................................................................................................. 12 ADIOS BEACHES ..................................................................................... 12 grapefruit vodka, rosemary, prosecco dulce vida reposado tequila, grand marnier, kalani coconut, hibiscus, lime CUCUMBER COCKTAIL ........................................................................ 12 ROAD TO REDEMPTION ..................................................................... 13 prairie cucumber vodka, st-germaine, lemon, cucumber, mint redemption high rye bourbon, boomerang liqueur, orange bitters WHALE HELLO THERE ........................................................................... 12 SHAKE YOUR RUM RUM ...................................................................... 14 gray whale gin, aperol, lemon, tonic cruzan rum, mt. gay rum, pineapple, coconut, lime, mango PINEAPPLE Co- V ....................................................................................... 12 GINGER MARGARITA ............................................................................ 13 vodka infused with fresh pineapples, served on the rocks or straight up dulce vida reposado tequila, cointreau, ginger, lime Wines • by the glass SPARKLING G/B RED G/B La Marca Prosecco (187ml), Italy ................................................................... 12 Stoller Pinot Noir, Oregon ....................................................................... 16/64 .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Financing Acquisitions and Growth: the Ambev Case
    17 Financing Acquisitions and Growth: The Ambev Case Daniel Penido de Lima Amorim¹ ¹ Fundação Dom Cabral - [email protected] KEYWORDS ABSTRACT Mergers and acquisitions; This case study aimed to investigate the growth driven by M&As of Ambev in Financing; the period between 1999 and 2015, emphasizing two sources of financing Theory of Free Cash Flows; addressed in Jensen (1986). On the one hand, the Free Cash Flow Theory Leveraged buyouts; postulates that managers would apply resources generated by self-financing in Ambev. acquisitions. On the other hand, companies could incur on debts to perform the so-called leveraged buyouts. To verify if any of these theoretical Received 28.07.2017 Revised 05.09.2017 constructions is consistent with the Ambev case, were analyzed the free cash Accepted 18.10.2017 flows and the company's indebtedness. The results show that each of these theories bears similarities to a specific period of growth of the company. At ISSN 1980-4431 Double blind review first, this growth refers to leveraged buyouts. After 2008, the strong reduction of indebtedness and increased self-financing refer to the Free Cash Flow Theory. These results unveil a model of growth that can be adopted strategically by other companies. 1 Introduction 2012). But which resources financed this growth through M&As? In general, self-financing The Companhia de Bebidas das Américas resources are used for such purposes, as well as (Ambev) is a multinational beverage company debt, and exchange of shares may also occur headquartered in Brazil, currently participating in (Damodaran, 2001; Gugler, Mueller, the largest conglomerate of this industry in the Weishcelbaumer & Yortoglu, 2012; Jensen, world, Anheuser-Busch InBev.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 1:16-Cv-21181-UU Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/01/2016 Page 1 of 51
    Case 1:16-cv-21181-UU Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/01/2016 Page 1 of 51 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. __________________ DR. HENRY VAZQUEZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, CLASS ACTION JURY DEMAND Plaintiff, v. ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES, LLC, Defendant. ___________________________________/ CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Plaintiff, DR. HENRY VAZQUEZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated (the “Class” or “Class Members”), hereby brings this action against ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES, LLC (“AB”) for its sale of alleged “Abbey” Beer that, quite simply, isn’t. Plaintiff states and alleges as follows: NATURE OF CLAIM 1. This class action is brought on behalf of Plaintiff and all other similarly situated individuals who purchased Leffe Beer1, and were deceived by AB’s labeling and packaging into believing that Leffe Beer is brewed in an abbey, and thereby brewed in smaller quantities under the supervision of monks. The packaging and labeling on Leffe Beers include the words “Abbey Ale” and “Abbaye de Abbey of Leffe,” a picture of an abbey, and the “Story of the abbey of Leffe.” 1 As used herein, the terms “Leffe Beer” refers to six-pack bottles of Leffe Brown and Leffe Blond. 1 Case 1:16-cv-21181-UU Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/01/2016 Page 2 of 51 Further, the labels state “Anno 1240,” implying that Leffe Beer has been brewed since that date in an abbey. 2. Through its marketing, AB bolsters its deceptive labeling and packaging by making misleading claims, including the following: .
    [Show full text]
  • Inbev) and Renault-Revoz
    Multi-national companies in the Slovenian media: the cases of Interbrew (InBev) and Renault-Revoz This analysis was supposed to find out what was the typical media coverage of multinational companies in the Slovenian media. We would, however, claim precisely the opposite, namely that there is no ‘typical’ presentation of the MNC in the Slovenian media. Our first hypothesis is that the amount and content of coverage depends on a variety of factors that make the media coverage of any particular MNC clearly different from the others. Although we are not able to specify the entire range of factors, we would like to emphasise one of them. This is the basis for our second hypothesis, namely that the presence of harmony or conflict of a MNC with some powerful and influential domestic actors, such as domestic companies, the state actors, local leaders etc., may – at least to some extend – determine the media treatment of this MNC by the Slovenian media. Two multinational companies, namely, Interbrew (today’s Inbew) and Renault (or its company Revoz in Slovenia that is today 100% owned by Renault) have been selected and the ways how they have been presented to the Slovenian public by some of the typical Slovenian media have been studied. Our main focus here is on the Interbrew, since it received massive media coverage and provides perhaps the clearest example of tension between a MNC and some major actors in the Slovenian society. However, in order to test our hypotheses at least some comparison was required. Consequently, we decided to select another, quite a different case to demonstrate the ‘harmony’ between the MNC, the Slovenian society and the Slovenian media.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC VERSION FILED ON: May 4, 2020
    EFiled: May 04 2020 04:30PM EDT Transaction ID 65615297 Case No. 2019-0587-AGB IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CONSOLIDATED IN RE KRAFT HEINZ COMPANY C.A. No. 2019-0587-AGB DERIVATIVE LITIGATION PUBLIC VERSION FILED ON: May 4, 2020 CONSOLIDATED AMENDED VERIFIED STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT Plaintiffs General Retirement System of the City of Detroit, Police & Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit, and Erste Asset Management GmbH, by and through their undersigned counsel, submit this Consolidated Amended Verified Stockholder Derivative Complaint against the defendants named herein for breaches of fiduciary duty in their capacities as officers, directors, and/or controlling stockholders of The Kraft Heinz Company (“KHC” or the “Company”). The allegations of this Complaint are based on the knowledge of Plaintiffs as to themselves, and on information and belief, including the investigation of counsel, the review of publicly available information, and the review of books and records produced by KHC in response to Plaintiffs’ demands made under 8 Del. C. § 220 (“Section 220”), as to all other matters, all of which books and records are expressly incorporated by reference in this Complaint. For the avoidance of doubt, this incorporation by reference does not change the pleading standard applicable to any motion to dismiss that may be filed in this case. -1- PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1. This action arises out of the misuse of material, non-public information and related breaches of fiduciary duty by KHC’s controlling stockholder, Brazilian- American global investment giant 3G Capital, Inc. (together with its affiliates, “3G”). 2.
    [Show full text]