DOCSLIB.ORG

West Buxton Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
West Buxton Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR HYDROPOWER LICENSE West Buxton Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No. 2531-075 Maine Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Office of Energy Projects Division of Hydropower Licensing 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426 July 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................. ii LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................. vii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... - 1 - 1.1 APPLICATION ............................................................................................. - 1 - 1.2 PURPOSE OF ACTION AND NEED FOR POWER ................................ - 1 - 1.2.1 Purpose of Action ................................................................................... - 1 - 1.2.2 Need for Power ....................................................................................... - 3 - 1.3 STATUTORY AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS ....................... - 4 - 1.3.1 Federal Power Act .................................................................................. - 4 - 1.3.2 Clean Water Act ..................................................................................... - 7 - 1.3.3 Endangered Species Act ......................................................................... - 8 - 1.3.4 Coastal Zone Management Act ............................................................. - 9 - 1.3.5 National Historic Preservation Act ....................................................... - 9 - 1.4 PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT ...................................................... - 10 - 1.4.1 Scoping .................................................................................................. - 10 - 1.4.2 Interventions ......................................................................................... - 11 - 1.4.3 Comments on the Application ............................................................. - 11 - 2.0 PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES ...................................... - 11 - 2.1 NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE .................................................................. - 11 - 2.1.1 Existing Project Facilities .................................................................... - 11 - 2.1.2 Project Safety ........................................................................................ - 15 - 2.1.3 Existing Project Operation .................................................................. - 15 - 2.2 APPLICANT’S PROPOSAL ...................................................................... - 18 - 2.2.1 Proposed Operation and Environmental Measures .......................... - 18 - 2.3 STAFF ALTERNATIVE ............................................................................ - 19 - 2.4 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED BUT ELIMINATED FROM DETAILED ANALYSIS ............................................................................ - 20 - 2.4.1 Issuing Non-power License .................................................................. - 20 - 2.4.2 Federal Government Takeover of the Project ................................... - 21 - 2.4.3 Retiring the Project .............................................................................. - 21 - 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ............................................................. - 21 - 3.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SACO RIVER BASIN ............... - 22 - 3.2 SCOPE OF CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ANALYSIS .............................. - 22 - 3.2.1 Geographic Scope ................................................................................. - 23 - 3.2.2 Temporal Scope .................................................................................... - 23 - 3.3 PROPOSED ACTION AND ACTION ALTERNATIVES ..................... - 23 - 3.3.1 Aquatic Resources ................................................................................ - 24 - 3.3.2 Terrestrial Resources ........................................................................... - 68 - 3.3.3 Threatened and Endangered Species ................................................. - 85 - 3.3.4 Land Use and Recreation .................................................................... - 89 - - ii - 3.3.5 Cultural Resources ............................................................................. - 106 - 4.0 DEVELOPMENTAL ANALYSIS ........................................................... - 111 - 4.1 POWER AND ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF THE PROJECT ............ - 112 - 4.2 COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES .................................................. - 113 - 4.2.1 No-Action Alternative ........................................................................ - 114 - 4.2.2 White Pine Hydro’s Proposal ............................................................ - 114 - 4.2.3 Staff Alternative ................................................................................. - 115 - 4.3 COST OF ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES ....................................... - 116 - 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................. - 121 - 5.1 COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT AND RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE ........................................................................................ - 121 - 5.1.1 Staff’s Recommended Changes to White Pine Hydro’s Proposal . - 123 - 5.1.2 Measures Not Recommended ............................................................ - 128 - 5.1.3 Conclusion ........................................................................................... - 128 - 5.2 UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS ................................................ - 129 - 5.3 SUMMARY OF SECTION 10(j) RECOMMENDATIONS ................. - 129 - 5.4 CONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLANS ......................... - 132 - 6.0 FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ......................................... - 134 - 7.0 LITERATURE CITED ............................................................................. - 135 - 8.0 LIST OF PREPARERS ............................................................................ - 142 - APPENDIX A ................................................................................................................. A-1 APPENDIX B ................................................................................................................. B-1 - iii - LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Location of the West Buxton Project and other dams in the Saco River Basin.. ................................................................................................... - 2 - Figure 2. West Buxton Project site plan. ..................................................................... - 12 - Figure 3. West Buxton Project boundary and existing and proposed recreation facilities. ....................................................................................................... - 16 - Figure 4. Saco River at West Buxton - Annual Flow Duration Curve. ....................... - 25 - Figure 5. Vegetation cover types within the existing West Buxton Project boundary.. .................................................................................................... - 70 - Figure 6. Existing project recreation sites at the West Buxton Project. ...................... - 92 - Figure 7. Proposed recreation facilities location map. .............................................. - 101 - Figure 8. Proposed project boat launch.. ................................................................... - 102 - Figure 9. Proposed angler access trail improvements.. ............................................. - 103 - Figure 10. Proposed canoe take-out improvements. ................................................. - 104 - Figure 11. Proposed tailwater access site improvements.. ........................................ - 105 - - iv - LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Established and draft Maine water quality standards for applicable parameters.. ................................................................................................... - 26 - Table 2. The range and average for water quality parameters in the West Buxton Project impoundment and Maine DEP trophic state guidelines. .................. - 28 - Table 3. Indices of community structure for the aquatic macroinvertebrate community in the tailwater section of the West Buxton Project, July and August 2013. ................................................................................................. - 30 - Table 4. Stage-discharge and wetted perimeter relationship of transect 1 (from Stetson-Harza, 1991) located 900 feet downstream from the West Buxton Project. .............................................................................................. - 31 - Table 5. Fish collected at two sites on the Saco River, Hollis, Maine. ....................... - 33 - Table 6. Change in habitat suitability for adult brown trout in the project flood channel at various gate releases.. .................................................................. - 37 - Table 7. Annual and total fish passage numbers at the Cataract East channel fish lift and the Cataract West channel Denil fish ladder since commencement of operations through 2016. .......................................................................... - 40 - Table 8. Annual and total fish passage numbers at the Skelton fish lift since commencement of operations
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Maine Open Water and Ice Fishing, 2013
    Maine State Library Maine State Documents Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Law Books Inland Fisheries and Wildlife 1-1-2013 Maine Open Water and Ice Fishing, 2013 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalmaine.com/ifw_law_books Recommended Citation "Maine Open Water and Ice Fishing, 2013" (2013). Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Law Books. 459. http://digitalmaine.com/ifw_law_books/459 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Inland Fisheries and Wildlife at Maine State Documents. It has been accepted for inclusion in Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Law Books by an authorized administrator of Maine State Documents. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHE CK OUT THE MDIFW WEBSITE: MEFISHWILDLIFE.COM MAINE OPETER N WA & ICE FISHING FISH MAINE H ow to Use This Book on pg. 5 L icense Types and Fees New Regulations FREE Family Fishing Days M anagement Articles THE OFFICIAL STATE OF MAINE OAPEN W TER & ICE FISHING LAWS AND RULES: APRIL 1, 2013 – DECEMBER 31, 2013 Information appearing in this book is not valid after December 31, 2013. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF INLAND FISHERIES & WILDLIFE TABLE OF CONTENTS Poachers are thieves....help us catch them! ALLAGASH WILDERNESS WATERWAY .............................. 36 BAITFISH, LAWS PERTAINING TO BAIT DEALERS AND THE USE OF BAITFISH ................................................42-43 BOUNDARY WATERS BETWEEN MAINE AND NEW HAMPSHIRE ............................................ 46 BOUNDARY WATERS BETWEEN MAINE AND NEW BRUNSWICK ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Volunteer Manual Saco River Corridor Commission
    Volunteer: _________________________________ Site(s): ____________________________________ 2019 Volunteer Manual Saco River Corridor Commission 2019 RIVERS Water Quality Monitoring Program is coordinated by: Dear RIVERS Volunteer, On behalf of Green Mountain Conservation Group and the Saco River Corridor Commission we would like to thank you for volunteering with the 2019 RIVERS Water Quality Monitoring Program. Since 2001, the Regional Interstate Volunteers for the Ecosystems and Rivers of Saco (RIVERS) program has depended on dedicated community members to conduct high quality citizen science in the Saco/Ossipee Watershed. By volunteering with RIVERS, you are collecting data to better understand the water quality in our area. You are helping to identify locations where water quality has been impacted, in addition to collecting valuable baseline data that can be utilized in planning for future regional development. While science is our goal, your safety is our top priority. Data collection is nice, but not at the expense of your well-being. If at any point in time you feel unsafe at your site, discontinue monitoring and leave. This includes but is not limited to high waters, suspicious persons, or inclement weather. Follow your gut, and only do what you feel comfortable with. Reach out to your volunteer coordinator if you have any issues or concerns about the program, even while out sampling. We want to help you if you get stuck on what to do, are having equipment issues, or have general comments on how to improve the program. We are here to help and value feedback from our volunteers. The RIVERS program is only successful because of you - our intrepid, boots-on-the-ground volunteer group.
    [Show full text]
  • Maine Open Water Fishing Laws Summary, 1975 Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Game
    Maine State Library Digital Maine Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Law Books Inland Fisheries and Wildlife 1-1-1975 Maine Open Water Fishing Laws Summary, 1975 Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Game Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalmaine.com/ifw_law_books Recommended Citation Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Game, "Maine Open Water Fishing Laws Summary, 1975" (1975). Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Law Books. 301. https://digitalmaine.com/ifw_law_books/301 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Inland Fisheries and Wildlife at Digital Maine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Law Books by an authorized administrator of Digital Maine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maine Open Water Fishing Laws Summary Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Game 284 State Street, Augusta, Maine 04330 0££K) auie^M 'e+snSny '+994S 9+p+S VQZ FISHING LICENSES Commissioner of Indian Affairs stating that the person described is an awe0 pue sauaijsij pupguj jo juauupiedaQ auip^Aj Indian and a member of that tribe. For this purpose, an Indian shall RESIDENT NONRESIDENT be any member on tribal lists of the Penobscot and Passamaquoddy 16 years and older . $ 6.50 Season: age 16 and older $15.50 Tribes, or a person on the membership list of the Association of Combination ............. 10.50 12-15 years inclusive .. 2.50 Aroostook Indians and who has resided in Maine for at least 5 years. ‘ 3-day . ’ 6.50 15-day* “ ........................ 10.50 “ Leave or furlough . 2.50 7-day ................................. 7.50 3-day ................................
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Maine Invasive Aquatic Plants (2006)
    2006 YORK COUNTY INVASIVE AQUATIC SPECIES PROJECT Final Report (Updated/Modified March 2007) Association members participating in a York County Invasive Aquatic Species Project aquatic plant survey on Bauneg Beg Pond, September 9, 2006 with biologist, Laurie Callahan (center, paddle extended). (Photo by Mike Cannon) Project Sponsored by York County Soil & Water Conservation District Funding Provided by Davis Conservation Foundation Report Prepared By Laurie G. Callahan, Project Coordinator & Aquatic Biologist Updated/Modified March 2007 (Original - December 2006) 2006 YORK COUNTY INVASIVE AQUATIC SPECIES PROJECT Final Report Updated/Modified March 2007 (Original - December 2006) Contents I. Introduction II. How Project Goals Were Accomplished III. Other Project Activities & Information IV. Future Plans & Directions Appendices A. List of aquatic plant species that are on Maine’s list of “Banned Invasive Aquatic Plants” and invasive plant species found in York County waterbodies B. List of Maine Waterbodies Screened for Invasive Aquatic Plants (York County listing from that document) produced by Maine Center for Invasive Aquatic Plants (MCIAP) in 2006 C. 3 YCIASP (2006) Workshop Agendas D. Maine invasive aquatic species information resources & contacts list E. Results of the 2006 YCIASP “pre-project” questionnaire & responses and summarized responses to the 3 workshops evaluation forms (The spreadsheet documents are not available in these Appendices if looking at an electronic document, but are available from the YCSWCD office or from Laurie Callahan.) F. Field Survey Data Sheets for 2006 YCIASP 10 IAP Screening Surveys Performed (Copies of the Field Survey Data Sheets are not available in these Appendices if looking at an electronic document, but are available from the YCSWCD office or from Laurie Callahan) G.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Claims Three Businesses
    VOLUME 15, ISSUE 29 PO Box 75, North Waterboro, ME 04061 • 247-1033 • [email protected] FRIDAY, JULY 21, 2017 FREEEVERY FRIDAY SHOP LOCAL www.waterbororeporter.com LOCALLY OWNED & OPERATED Lake level contention Fire claims three businesses BY BRIGIT MCCALLUM [email protected] A public hearing will be held on Tuesday, July 25 at 6 p.m., as the Waterboro selectmen move toward enacting an ordinance to be known as the “Little Ossipee Lake Water Level Management Ordinance of the Town of Water- boro, Maine.” Town officials have moved to create the ordinance in the hope that it will stop the pro- cess whereby the Department of Environmental Protection could gain control of regulating water levels in the lake. There is a DEP public hearing currently scheduled for Aug. 21, to hear testimony from the Town and from Cleo Smith and 58 other lakefront residents who The remains of Brookfield Place in Waterboro at 7 p.m. on Sunday, July 16 after a fire started around 10 a.m. that destroyed the complex at 1009 Main submitted a petition to lower water Street. The businesses lost in the fire, of which the cause is undetermined, were Plummer’s Ace Hardware, Family Dollar and Asian Taste. levels in the lake ten years ago. If PHOTO BY KERRY DEANGELIS the August hearing occurs, water level controls could be taken over by the DEP. In case the creation Fire taxes of this ordinance does not prevent water supply the DEP hearing, and the hearing goes forth, the Town has submitted BY BRIGIT MCCALLUM sworn testimony from four wit- [email protected] nesses to defend itself against the requests in the petition.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Salmon Commission Public Advisory Panel
    MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE The following document is provided by the LAW AND LEGISLATIVE DIGITAL LIBRARY at the Maine State Law and Legislative Reference Library http://legislature.maine.gov/lawlib Reproduced from scanned originals with text recognition applied (searchable text may contain some errors and/or omissions) TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary . 2 Introduction . ... 3 Atlantic Salmon Commission Offices and Staff................................ 4 Funding.............................................................................. 5 Stocking .............................................................................. 6 Research and Management..................................................... 9 Water Quality Monitoring ......................................................... 12 Individual River Reports Aroostook River ............................................................. 19 Cove Brook .................................................................. 22 Dennys River.................... 24 Ducktrap River. .............................................................. 29 East Machias River ............................................................................ 31 Kenduskeag Stream ........................................................................... 33 Kennebec River .................................................................................. 35 Machias River .................................................................................... 37 Narraguagus River ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • YDPHC Physical Activity Guide 1.2019
    ──── Acton Alfred Arundel Berwick Biddeford Buxton Cornish Dayton Eliot Hollis Kennebunk Kennebunkport Kittery Lebanon Limerick Limington Lyman YORK COUNTY Newfield North Berwick PHYSICAL ACTIVITY Ogunquit Old Orchard Beach RESOURCE GUIDE Parsonsfield Saco Sanford Brought to you by: Shapleigh South Berwick Waterboro Wells York ──── The York District Public Health Council (YDPHC) is excited to present a Physical Activity Resource guide that includes all 29 communities of York County. This guide has been updated from the former York County Physical Activity Resource Guide from 2015. YDPHC is a representative, district-wide body formed in partnership with the Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention (MeCDC) to engage in collaborative planning and decision-making for the delivery of the Ten Essential Public Health Services in the York Public Health District. The York Public Health District includes all communities in York County. Our mission is to promote, improve, sustain, and advocate for the delivery of the essential public health services in York County. We recognize that this guide does not represent ALL the activities available to residents of York County. We aim to highlight free and public resources available to all. Many other options are available for your wellness needs. We encourage you to let us know if there is something that we missed. Our hope is that this resource guide will be useful to you and encourage physical activity among all members of your family. Use this guide only as intended - as a guide. As with any physical activity, there may be risks associated. Work within your own limits. It is your responsibility to determine if a new activity is right for you and your family.
    [Show full text]
  • MAINE BEACHES Discover Lobster, Lighthouses and Long Sandy Beaches 2017
    The MAINE BEACHES Discover Lobster, Lighthouses and Long Sandy Beaches 2017 The Yorks | Ogunquit | Wells | Sanford | The Kennebunks | Biddeford+Saco | Old Orchard Beach THEMAINEBEACHES.COM MAINE BEACHES VACATION IS YOURS FOR THE MAKING Fill your days with wide smiles and the joyful music of laughter and tumbling surf. Choose between a pile of golden fried clams or a freshly steamed Maine lobster. Thrill to world-class recreation, attractions, and entertainment. When you toss in the world’s most photographed lighthouse, miles and miles of shopping, CONTENTS and hundreds of welcoming places to stay, made up right, just for you, there is no doubting why the Maine Beaches continue to be a top vacation destination. Welcome to the Maine Beaches .................................................... 1 The Yorks ................................................................................................ 2 Ogunquit .................................................................................................4 Wells ......................................................................................................... 6 Sanford ....................................................................................................8 The Kennebunks ................................................................................10 Biddeford+Saco ...................................................................................12 Old Orchard Beach ...........................................................................14 Beaches at a Glance
    [Show full text]
  • Summer Field Team Celebrates
    Maine Conservation Corps 124 State House Station Augusta, ME 04333-0124 1-800-245-JOBS (in Maine) 207-624-6085 [email protected] http://www.maine.gov/doc/parks/mcc Summer Field Team Celebrates The 2013 Field Team summer season concluded with a celebration of the teams’ service at the Recognition Ceremony on August 9th at Lake George Regional Park in Canaan. Attendees had the pleasure of hearing from Jo Orlando, MCC director, Mick Rogers, Supervisor of Outdoor Recreation, Michael Ashmore from the Maine Commission for Community Service, Rex Turner from the Bureau of Parks and Public Lands, Lester Kenway from the Maine Appalachian Trail Club, Fern Burns form the Swan’s Island Summer 2013 Team Leaders at Recognition Lighthouse Committee. The ceremony was also graced with the presence of Anne Madore, Phil Gouzie, and Robert Poisson of the Maine chapter of the CCC Legacy. Madore and Gouzie had Team Leaders composed haikus, choreographed, and highlighted the accomplishments of their teams, and Program Coordinator Sara Knowles spoke about the season before everyone enjoyed lunch and, of course, cake. The 5th annual MCC Olympics & BBQ took place the night before, with events including MCC Jeopardy and the ever-popular pie eating contest. The Olympics ended in a tie between Roy’s tam and Nate’s team. The Senior Team Leaders devised a Sing-Off to break the tie, which Nate’s team declined and so forfeited. As a result, Team Leader Roy and his crew were crowned champions for 2013. Team Leaders Savannah Steele of Newberg, OR is a graduate of the MCC’s 2013 Trail Training Academy (TTA).
    [Show full text]
  • Survival and Movement of Fall-Stocked Brown Trout in the Lower Saco River
    Fishery Final Report Series No. 16-2 Survival and Movement of Fall-Stocked Brown Trout in the Lower Saco River By: Francis C. Brautigam Sebago Region December 2016 Maine Department of Inland Fisheries & Wildlife Fisheries and Hatcheries Division Job F-012 Survival and Movement of Fall-Stocked Brown Trout in the Lower Saco River Final Report No. 16-2 SUMMARY A telemetry study was conducted to assess the survival and movement of hatchery brown trout stocked in the lower 13.1 mile portion of the Saco River. For more than 10 years this river reach has been managed under special fishing regulations to allow year-round fishing and recreational harvest. Most Maine rivers and streams are open to recreational fishing from April through September. Fifty-nine fall yearling hatchery brown trout were equipped with radio transmitters and stocked below Skelton Dam (Town of Dayton) in the fall of 2013. All stocked fish were of a size that could be legally harvested by anglers. The movement and survival of these fish were monitored from October 2013 through August of 2014 using a portable and stationary receiver. Transmission signals indicated 64% of the study fish were alive within the 13.1 mile long study reach two months after stocking. By May of 2014 transmission signals were detected from 25% of the study fish, and by August (2014) signals were detected from 3% of the study fish. Transmitters were equipped with mortality switches, which were permanently activated in 44% of the fish over the course of the study. Monthly mortality was low throughout the study, with the heaviest mortality observed between March and May.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Mousam River near Sanford, Maine The majority of sampling effort in the Salmon Falls basin has focused on stations on the mainstem affected by dams and wastewater discharges. The Salmon Falls River has been managed as Class B for many years but has experienced continual problems attaining Class B standards for dissolved oxygen, bacteria and aquatic life, in the lower reaches,. All aquatic life monitoring stations downstream of the Berwick sewage treatment plant fail to attain assigned Class B standards. Introduction Geography The Saco River basin covers 1,696 square miles. The River originates at Saco Lake just north of Crawford Notch, New Hampshire and flows through the Mt. Washington Valley. About half of the drainage area is in the State of New Hampshire. Just east of Conway, New Hampshire it crosses into Maine, near Fryeburg, winds northeast for a short distance, and then meanders south- southeast through the mountains and hills of Western Maine. The Saco River continues southeast towards the urban coastal areas of Biddeford and Saco before emptying into Saco Bay. The total length from the Maine/New Hampshire border is approximately 85 miles. There are four other sampled streams in the Saco River basin listed in Basin Table 9. The Piscataqua/Salmon Falls River basin covers 1,356 sq. miles. The Piscataqua River is the tidal portion of the Salmon Falls River. The Biological Monitoring Program has not conducted any sampling in the tidal portions of the river so the remainder of this report will focus on the Salmon Falls River. For its entire length, including below head of tide, the River forms the Maine/New Hampshire border.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood of October 1996 in Southern Maine by Glenn Hodgkins and Gregory J
    Flood of October 1996 in Southern Maine by Glenn Hodgkins and Gregory J. Stewart U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 97-4189 Prepared in cooperation with the FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY uses Augusta, Maine science for a changing world 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bruce Babbitt, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mark Schaefer, Acting Director For additional information Copies of this report can contact: be purchased from: Chief, Maine District USGS Information Services U.S. Geological Survey Box 25286 26 Ganneston Drive Denver, CO 80225 Augusta, Me 04330 Telephone: (303) 202-4200 Telephone: (207) 622-8201 CONTENTS Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Purpose and Scope 1 Acknowledgments 2 Antecedent Hydrologic Conditions 2 Streamflows 2 Rainfall 2 Storm Characteristics 2 Rainfall Amounts 4 Rainfall Frequency 5 Description of Flood 6 Peak Water-Surface Elevations 6 Peak Flows 6 Peak-Flow Frequency 20 Extrapolation of Peak-Flow Frequency 21 Reservoir Storage 22 Flood Damages 23 Historical Perspective on Flood 23 Historical Peak Flows 24 Historical Peak Water-Surface Elevations 25 Summary and Conclusions 26 References Cited 27 FIGURES 1. Map showing location of study area and selected points 3 2. Graph showing daily rainfall totals from September 1, 1996 to October 19, 1996 at Portland International Jetport 4 3. Graph showing cumulative rainfall from October 20-22, 1996 at Portland International Jetport 5 4. Photograph showing aerial view of Presumpscot River at Route 302 in Westbrook, Maine on October 22, 19967 5. Photograph showing Presumpscot River at Route 302 in Westbrook, Maine on October 22, 19967 6.
    [Show full text]