DOCSLIB.ORG

I Homogeneous Nucleation of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) in Supersonic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
I Homogeneous Nucleation of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) in Supersonic Homogeneous Nucleation of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) in Supersonic Nozzles DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University Kayane Kohar Dingilian, M.S. Graduate Program in Chemical Engineering The Ohio State University 2020 Dissertation Committee: Barbara E. Wyslouzil, Advisor Nicholas Brunelli Isamu Kusaka i Copyright by Kayane Kohar Dingilian 2020 ii ABSTRACT Carbon dioxide (CO2) is an important greenhouse gas that contributes to global warming. To combat the rising emissions of CO2 into the atmosphere, scientists and researchers have devised several methods of carbon capture and storage (CCS), including the use of membranes to trap CO2 molecules, valves to condense CO2 from a mixture of gases, etc. Supersonic separation is a novel method of gas-gas separation that has been used to separate natural gas from other gases. It has been suggested for and is being currently studied as a method for the removal of CO2 from flue gas before it enters the atmosphere. Supersonic separation relies on the condensation of CO2 clusters into particles large enough to be inertially separated, requiring a size of approximately 1 micrometer in diameter. In order to effectively design hardware to capture CO2 using this mechanism, we need to study and collect fundamental nucleation properties of CO2 and quantify the process under supersonic flow conditions. To this end, we studied the condensation of CO2 in two supersonic nozzles of differing expansion rates, T1 and T3, and sought to quantify the onset of nucleation, particle size distributions, and aerosol number densities. First, we confirmed that homogeneous nucleation of CO2 could not take place in nozzle T1 when expansions started from a stagnation temperature of 20°C, no heat release was observed in pressure trace measurements at 7.0 to 11 mol% CO2. Lowering the stagnation temperature to 10°C showed some evidence of heat release, but it was uncertain to what extent that was due to condensation of particles or whether the nozzle i overexpansion had caused a shock to increase the temperature and pressure of the flow. Analysis of the saturation curve suggests the nucleation event was incomplete, and lower temperatures were required for a full characterization. Second, we performed a series of pressure trace measurements (PTM) in nozzle T3 for concentrations of CO2 in Ar ranging from 0.5 to 39 mol% with a stagnation pressure of 458 Torr (61 kPa) and a stagnation temperature of 20°C. We successfully observed the complete nucleation event over that range and characterized the flow conditions at the onset of nucleation at pressures ranging from 7.45 to 793 Pa and temperatures between 66.5 and 92.3 K. We also observed a wide variety of saturations at onset, ranging from 2290 to 1.49 x 106. An arbitrary cutoff was made, denoting systems of 3.0 mol% CO2 and higher to be of “mid-high” flow rates, and for systems at 2.0 mol% CO2 and lower to be of “low” flow rates. We observed a consistent shift in onset conditions and nucleation rates at approximately 12 mol% CO2 as increases in the amount of CO2 in the system contributed to an increasingly softer and warmer expansion. We further characterized the mid-high (3.0 to 39 mol%) flow region using small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and a limited number of Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy experiments. Experimental number densities were found to be on the order of 1012 cm-3 and nucleation rates on the order of 1017 cm-3s-1. Extrapolating from these experiments into the low CO2 flow regime, we obtained similar values for estimates of the number density and nucleation rates. FTIR spectra of the system of 12 mol% CO2 showed a transition from the gas phase to the solid crystalline phase, and the spectra suggest these particles are cubic in shape. ii Third, we compared our experimental results for the onset conditions and nucleation rates with theory, choosing combinations of self-consistent nucleation theory (SCNT) or simulation-based theory (ST) and surface tension relations by Quinn or based on fitting the data to the Lielmezs-Herrick (L-H) functional form. We also applied the nonisothermal correction factor of Feder et al. to account for incomplete thermalization between the condensing clusters and the carrier gas. The values of the nonisothermal correction factor ranged from 0.015 to 0.391, resulting in nucleation rates that ranged from approximately 1018 cm-3s-1 to 1019 cm-3s-1. In general, using the Quinn surface tension expression with either nucleation theory overestimates the pressures required to initiate nucleation, and using L-H with either nucleation theory underestimates them. We found, however, that ST theory captures the temperature dependence of the experimental data slightly better than SCNT does. We also developed a protocol for ensuring that the nucleation we observed in our experiments was purely homogeneous or in the near-homogenous limit by flowing carrier gas through the nozzle for 1 hour at 90 SLM to remove any trace amounts of condensable vapors. An independent analysis of the dry traces from our experiments showed that we could reproduce the background flow conditions to a maximum deviation of pressure ratio of 0.00046 and temperature of 0.307 K. Overall, we observed excellent agreement between our experiments and those of higher pressure and temperature conditions, as well as promising overlap with those at lower ones. The free energy barrier to nucleation in our experiments appears to be similar to those of other experiments in supersonic nozzles and can serve to bridge the gap between different nucleation regimes. iii To my family, who instilled and nurtured my passion for learning, And to the faculty and students, who fostered my passion for teaching others. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Barbara Wyslouzil, for her guidance and mentorship of my graduate career. She helped me grow and develop as a researcher and also encouraged me to explore myself as an academic professional through participation in teaching opportunities and conferences. I truly believe I could not have found a better advisor for my graduate experience. Second, I extend my gratitude to the faculty with whom I developed my skills as a teaching assistant and lecturer at The Ohio State University – namely Dr. David Tomasko, Dr. David Wood, Dr. Jeffrey Chalmers, Dr. Andrew Tong, and Dr. Kurt Koelling. They have all provided me with opportunities to perform duties beyond those of grading and holding office hours, including providing full or abridged lectures and becoming involved in the courses at a deeper instructional level. I have gained valuable teaching experience and learned lessons that will help me as I progress in my career. Third, I would like to thank those who have served on my committees, at all levels of exams, especially Dr. Nicholas Brunelli, Dr. Isamu Kusaka, and Dr. Heather Allen, for encouraging me to think critically about my research and reflect on the greater significance of my findings. Fourth, I would like to thank my previous advisor and mentors from the California Institute of Technology, Dr. Richard Flagan and Dr. Michael Vicic, for their support beginning from my undergraduate years and extending through the years afterwards. Through them, I’ve been allowed to establish a greater network of scientists and researchers as well as pursue my academic dreams. v Fifth, I would like to thank Soenke Seifert and Randall Winans at Argonne National Laboratory for their assistance in setting up and making measurements using the beam at the Advanced Photon Source. Thank you to Martina Lippe for visiting and helping conduct experiments as well. Sixth, my appreciation goes out to my labmates, both former and present, including: Dr. Andrew Amaya, Dr. Yensil Park, Dr. Kehinde Ogunronbi, Tong Sun, Jiaqi Luo, and visiting scholar Jiang Bian. Much of my training in the experiments was performed by Andrew and Kehinde. I also had the pleasure of mentoring and training two wonderful undergraduate researchers myself – Lahari Pallerla and Gabrielle Adams. Finally, I would like to thank the Dingilian family – my father, mother, sister Armine, and brother Hovanness, for their continued presence and support. None of my efforts would have been possible without the strong backbone of my family. vi VITA October 2012 – June 2016 Bachelor of Science, Chemical Engineering California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California, USA August 2016 – December 2019 Master of Science, Chemical Engineering The Ohio State University August 2017 – May 2019 Graduate Teaching Assistant January 2020 – May 2020 The Ohio State University August 2016 – present Graduate Research Associate The Ohio State University vii PUBLICATIONS 1. K. K. Dingilian, R. Halonen, V. Tikkanen, B. Reischl, H. Vehkamäki, B. E. Wyslouzil. Homogeneous nucleation of carbon dioxide in supersonic nozzles I: experiments and classical theories. Physical Chemistry and Chemical Physics. 2020. 2. R. Halonen, V. Tikkanen, B. Reischl, K. K. Dingilian, B. E. Wyslouzil, H. Vehkamäki. Homogeneous nucleation of carbon dioxide in supersonic nozzles II: molecular dynamics simulations and properties of nucleating clusters. Physical Chemistry and Chemical Physics, submitted. FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: Chemical Engineering Aerosol Physics Physical/Analytical Chemistry viii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………………… i Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………………….. v Vita………………………………………………………………………………………………. vii List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………………. xi List of Figures…………………………………………………………………………………. xiii Chapter 1: Introduction………………………………………………………………………… 1 Chapter 2: Nucleation Theory…………………………………………………………………. 7 Section 2.1: Thermodynamics of Nucleating Clusters……………………………… 8 Section 2.2: The Classical Nucleation Rate………………………………………... 12 Section 2.3: Self-Consistent Nucleation Theory…………………………………… 17 Section 2.4: The Non-Isothermal Correction Factor………………………………. 18 Chapter 3: Materials and Methods………………………………………………………….. 24 Section 3.1: Physical Properties of Ar and CO2…………………………………….24 Section 3.2: Nozzles T1 and T3……………………………………………………..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Colloidal Crystallization: Nucleation and Growth
    Colloidal Crystallization: Nucleation and Growth Dave Weitz Harvard Urs Gasser Konstanz Andy Schofield Edinburgh Rebecca Christianson Harvard Peter Pusey Edinburgh Peter Schall Harvard Frans Spaepen Harvard Eric Weeks Emory John Crocker UPenn •Colloids as model systems – soft materials •Nucleation and growth of colloidal crystals •Defect growth in crystals •Binary Alloy Colloidal Crystals NSF, NASA http://www.deas.harvard.edu/projects/weitzlab EMU 6/7//04 Colloidal Crystals Colloids 1 nm - 10 µm solid particles in a solvent Ubiquitous ink, paint, milk, butter, mayonnaise, toothpaste, blood Suspensions can act like both liquid and solid Modify flow properties Control: Size, uniformity, interactions Colloidal Particles •Solid particles in fluid •Hard Spheres •Volume exclusion •Stability: •Short range repulsion •Sometimes a slight charge Colloid Particles are: •Big Slow •~ a ~ 1 micron • τ ~ a2/D ~ ms to sec •Can “see” them •Follow individual particle dynamics Model: Colloid Æ Atom Phase Behavior Colloids Atomic Liquids U U s s Hard Spheres Leonard-Jones Osmotic Pressure Attraction Centro-symmetric Centro-symmetric Thermalized: kBT Thermalized: kBT Gas Gas Liquid Density Liquid Solid Solid Phase behavior is similar Hard Sphere Phase Diagram Volume Fraction Controls Phase Behavior liquid - crystal liquid coexistence crystal 49% 54% 63% 74% φ maximum packing maximum packing φRCP≈0.63 φHCP=0.74 0 Increase φ => Decrease Temperature F = U - TS Entropy Drives Crystallization 0 Entropy => Free Volume F = U - TS Disordered: Ordered: •Higher configurational
    [Show full text]
  • Entropy and the Tolman Parameter in Nucleation Theory
    entropy Article Entropy and the Tolman Parameter in Nucleation Theory Jürn W. P. Schmelzer 1 , Alexander S. Abyzov 2 and Vladimir G. Baidakov 3,* 1 Institute of Physics, University of Rostock, Albert-Einstein-Strasse 23-25, 18059 Rostock, Germany 2 National Science Center Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology, 61108 Kharkov, Ukraine 3 Institute of Thermal Physics, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Amundsen Street 107a, 620016 Yekaterinburg, Russia * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-381-498-6889; Fax: +49-381-498-6882 Received: 23 May 2019; Accepted: 5 July 2019; Published: 9 July 2019 Abstract: Thermodynamic aspects of the theory of nucleation are commonly considered employing Gibbs’ theory of interfacial phenomena and its generalizations. Utilizing Gibbs’ theory, the bulk parameters of the critical clusters governing nucleation can be uniquely determined for any metastable state of the ambient phase. As a rule, they turn out in such treatment to be widely similar to the properties of the newly-evolving macroscopic phases. Consequently, the major tool to resolve problems concerning the accuracy of theoretical predictions of nucleation rates and related characteristics of the nucleation process consists of an approach with the introduction of the size or curvature dependence of the surface tension. In the description of crystallization, this quantity has been expressed frequently via changes of entropy (or enthalpy) in crystallization, i.e., via the latent heat of melting or crystallization. Such a correlation between the capillarity phenomena and entropy changes was originally advanced by Stefan considering condensation and evaporation. It is known in the application to crystal nucleation as the Skapski–Turnbull relation.
    [Show full text]
  • Heterogeneous Nucleation of Water Vapor on Different Types of Black Carbon Particles
    https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-202 Preprint. Discussion started: 21 April 2020 c Author(s) 2020. CC BY 4.0 License. Heterogeneous nucleation of water vapor on different types of black carbon particles Ari Laaksonen1,2, Jussi Malila3, Athanasios Nenes4,5 5 1Finnish Meteorological Institute, 00101 Helsinki, Finland. 2Department of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, 70211 Kuopio, Finland. 3Nano and Molecular Systems Research Unit, 90014 University of Oulu, Finland. 4Laboratory of Atmospheric Processes and their Impacts, School of Architecture, Civil & Environmental Engineering, École 10 Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland 5 Institute of Chemical Engineering Sciences, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (FORTH/ICE-HT), 26504, Patras, Greece Correspondence to: Ari Laaksonen ([email protected]) 15 Abstract: Heterogeneous nucleation of water vapor on insoluble particles affects cloud formation, precipitation, the hydrological cycle and climate. Despite its importance, heterogeneous nucleation remains a poorly understood phenomenon that relies heavily on empirical information for its quantitative description. Here, we examine heterogeneous nucleation of water vapor on and cloud drop activation of different types of soots, both pure black carbon particles, and black carbon particles mixed with secondary organic matter. We show that the recently developed adsorption nucleation theory 20 quantitatively predicts the nucleation of water and droplet formation upon particles of the various soot types. A surprising consequence of this new understanding is that, with sufficient adsorption site density, soot particles can activate into cloud droplets – even when completely lacking any soluble material. 1 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-202 Preprint. Discussion started: 21 April 2020 c Author(s) 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Latent Heat in Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation
    EGU21-16164, updated on 02 Oct 2021 https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-16164 EGU General Assembly 2021 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. The role of latent heat in heterogeneous ice nucleation Olli Pakarinen, Cintia Pulido Lamas, Golnaz Roudsari, Bernhard Reischl, and Hanna Vehkamäki University of Helsinki, INAR/Physics, University of Helsinki, Finland ([email protected]) Understanding the way in which ice forms is of great importance to many fields of science. Pure water droplets in the atmosphere can remain in the liquid phase to nearly -40º C. Crystallization of ice in the atmosphere therefore typically occurs in the presence of ice nucleating particles (INPs), such as mineral dust or organic particles, which trigger heterogeneous ice nucleation at clearly higher temperatures. The growth of ice is accompanied by a significant release of latent heat of fusion, which causes supercooled liquid droplets to freeze in two stages [Pruppacher and Klett, 1997]. We are studying these topics by utilizing the monatomic water model [Molinero and Moore, 2009] for unbiased molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, where different surfaces immersed in water are cooled below the melting point over tens of nanoseconds of simulation time and crystallization is followed. With a combination of finite difference calculations and novel moving-thermostat molecular dynamics simulations we show that the release of latent heat from ice growth has a noticeable effect on both the ice growth rate and the initial structure of the forming ice. However, latent heat is found not to be as critically important in controlling immersion nucleation as it is in vapor-to- liquid nucleation [Tanaka et al.2017].
    [Show full text]
  • Using Supercritical Fluid Technology As a Green Alternative During the Preparation of Drug Delivery Systems
    pharmaceutics Review Using Supercritical Fluid Technology as a Green Alternative During the Preparation of Drug Delivery Systems Paroma Chakravarty 1, Amin Famili 2, Karthik Nagapudi 1 and Mohammad A. Al-Sayah 2,* 1 Small Molecule Pharmaceutics, Genentech, Inc. So. San Francisco, CA 94080, USA; [email protected] (P.C.); [email protected] (K.N.) 2 Small Molecule Analytical Chemistry, Genentech, Inc. So. San Francisco, CA 94080, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +650-467-3810 Received: 3 October 2019; Accepted: 18 November 2019; Published: 25 November 2019 Abstract: Micro- and nano-carrier formulations have been developed as drug delivery systems for active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) that suffer from poor physico-chemical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic properties. Encapsulating the APIs in such systems can help improve their stability by protecting them from harsh conditions such as light, oxygen, temperature, pH, enzymes, and others. Consequently, the API’s dissolution rate and bioavailability are tremendously improved. Conventional techniques used in the production of these drug carrier formulations have several drawbacks, including thermal and chemical stability of the APIs, excessive use of organic solvents, high residual solvent levels, difficult particle size control and distributions, drug loading-related challenges, and time and energy consumption. This review illustrates how supercritical fluid (SCF) technologies can be superior in controlling the morphology of API particles and in the production of drug carriers due to SCF’s non-toxic, inert, economical, and environmentally friendly properties. The SCF’s advantages, benefits, and various preparation methods are discussed. Drug carrier formulations discussed in this review include microparticles, nanoparticles, polymeric membranes, aerogels, microporous foams, solid lipid nanoparticles, and liposomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermodynamics and Kinetics of Binary Nucleation in Ideal-Gas Mixtures
    1 Thermodynamics and kinetics of binary nucleation in ideal-gas mixtures Nikolay V. Alekseechkin Akhiezer Institute for Theoretical Physics, National Science Centre “Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology”, Akademicheskaya Street 1, Kharkov 61108, Ukraine Email: [email protected] Abstract . The nonisothermal single-component theory of droplet nucleation (Alekseechkin, 2014) is extended to binary case; the droplet volume V , composition x , and temperature T are the variables of the theory. An approach based on macroscopic kinetics (in contrast to the standard microscopic model of nucleation operating with the probabilities of monomer attachment and detachment) is developed for the droplet evolution and results in the derived droplet motion equations in the space (V , x,T) - equations for V& ≡ dV / dt , x& , and T& . The work W (V , x,T) of the droplet formation is calculated; it is obtained in the vicinity of the saddle point as a quadratic form with diagonal matrix. Also the problem of generalizing the single-component Kelvin equation for the equilibrium vapor pressure to binary case is solved; it is presented here as a problem of integrability of a Pfaffian equation. The equation for T& is shown to be the first law of thermodynamics for the droplet, which is a consequence of Onsager’s reciprocal relations and the linked-fluxes concept. As an example of ideal solution for demonstrative numerical calculations, the o-xylene-m-xylene system is employed. Both nonisothermal and enrichment effects are shown to exist; the mean steady-state overheat of droplets and their mean steady-state enrichment are calculated with the help of the 3D distribution function.
    [Show full text]
  • Spinodal Lines and Equations of State: a Review
    10 l Nuclear Engineering and Design 95 (1986) 297-314 297 North-Holland, Amsterdam SPINODAL LINES AND EQUATIONS OF STATE: A REVIEW John H. LIENHARD, N, SHAMSUNDAR and PaulO, BINEY * Heat Transfer/ Phase-Change Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77004, USA The importance of knowing superheated liquid properties, and of locating the liquid spinodal line, is discussed, The measurement and prediction of the spinodal line, and the limits of isentropic pressure undershoot, are reviewed, Means are presented for formulating equations of state and fundamental equations to predict superheated liquid properties and spinodal limits, It is shown how the temperature dependence of surface tension can be used to verify p - v - T equations of state, or how this dependence can be predicted if the equation of state is known. 1. Scope methods for making simplified predictions of property information, which can be applied to the full range of Today's technology, with its emphasis on miniaturiz­ fluids - water, mercury, nitrogen, etc. [3-5]; and predic­ ing and intensifying thennal processes, steadily de­ tions of the depressurizations that might occur in ther­ mands higher heat fluxes and poses greater dangers of mohydraulic accidents. (See e.g. refs. [6,7].) sending liquids beyond their boiling points into the metastable, or superheated, state. This state poses the threat of serious thermohydraulic explosions. Yet we 2. The spinodal limit of liquid superheat know little about its thermal properties, and cannot predict process behavior after a liquid becomes super­ heated. Some of the practical situations that require a 2.1. The role of the equation of state in defining the spinodal line knowledge the limits of liquid superheat, and the physi­ cal properties of superheated liquids, include: - Thennohydraulic explosions as might occur in nuclear Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • About Nucleation
    Nucleation • Nucleation: localized formation of a distinct thermodynamic phase. • Nucleation an occur in a gas, liquid or solid phase. Some examples of phases that may form via nucleation include: 1) in gas: Creation of liquid droplets in saturated vapor; 2) in liquid: formation of gaseous bubbles, crystals (e.g., ice formation from water), or glassy regions; 3) in solid: Nucleation of crystalline, amorphous, and even vacancy clusters in solid materials. Such solid state nucleation is important, for example, to the semiconductor industry. • Most nucleation processes are physical, rather than chemical. • Nucleation normally occurs at nucleation sites on surfaces contacting the liquid or vapor. Suspended particles or minute bubbles also provide nucleation sites. This is called heterogeneous nucleation (Lecture 12). • Nucleation without preferential nucleation sites is homogeneous nucleation (Lecture 10-11). Homogeneous nucleation occurs spontaneously and randomly, but it requires superheating or supercooling of the medium. Ref. wikipedia website Homogeneous Nucleation • Compared to the heterogeneous nucleation (which starts at nucleation sites on surfaces), Homogeneous nucleation occurs with much more difficulty in the interior of a uniform substance. The creation of a nucleus implies the formation of an interface at the boundaries of a new phase. • Liquids cooled below the maximum heterogeneous nucleation temperature (melting temperature), but which are above the homogeneous nucleation temperature (pure substance freezing temperature) are said to be supercooled. This is useful for making amorphous solids and other metastable structures, but can delay the progress of industrial chemical processes or produce undesirable effects in the context of casting. • Supercooling brings about supersaturation, the driving force for nucleation. Supersaturation occurs when the pressure in the newly formed solid is less than the vapor pressure, and brings about a change in free energy per unit volume, Gv, between the liquid and newly created solid phase.
    [Show full text]
  • Nucleation and Condensation in Gas-Vapor Mixtures of Alkanes and Water
    Nucleation and condensation in gas-vapor mixtures of alkanes and water Citation for published version (APA): Peeters, P. (2002). Nucleation and condensation in gas-vapor mixtures of alkanes and water. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. https://doi.org/10.6100/IR559332 DOI: 10.6100/IR559332 Document status and date: Published: 01/01/2002 Document Version: Publisher’s PDF, also known as Version of Record (includes final page, issue and volume numbers) Please check the document version of this publication: • A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinetics of Phase Transformations: Nucleation & Growth
    Northeastern University Kinetics of Phase Transformations: Nucleation & Growth Radhika Barua Department of Chemical Engineering Northeastern University Boston, MA USA Northeastern University Thermodynamics of Phase Transformation For phase transformations (constant T & P) relative stability of the system is defined by its Gibb’s free energy (G). • Gibb’s free energy of a system: G • G=H-TS ΔGa • Criterion for stability: dG=0 dG=0 • dG=0 ΔG • Criterion for phase transformation: • ΔG= GA-GB < 0 B Activated A State But …… How fast does the phase transformation occur ? 2 Northeastern University Kinetics of Phase Transformation Phase transformations in metals/alloys occur by nucleation and growth. • Nucleation: New phase (β) appears at certain sites within the metastable parent (α) phase. • Homogeneous Nucleation: Occurs spontaneously & randomly without preferential nucleation site. • Heterogeneous Nucleation: Occurs at preferential sites such as grain boundaries, dislocations or impurities. • Growth: Nuclei grows into the surrounding matrix. SOLID LIQUID Example: Solidification , L S (Transformations between crystallographic & non-crystallographic states) 3 Northeastern University Driving force for solidification Example: Solidification , L S • At a temperature T: L L L S S S Driving Force for • G = H - TS ; G = H - TS solidification • ΔG = GL – GS = ΔH – TΔS ΔG • At the equilibrium melting point (Tm): • ΔG = ΔH – TmΔS = 0 GS • ΔH = L (Latent heat of fusion) Free energy (G) • For small undercoolings (ΔT): ΔT GL • ΔG ≈ L ΔT Tm T TM Temperature
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the Physics of Nucleation
    C. R. Physique 7 (2006) 946–958 http://france.elsevier.com/direct/COMREN/ Nucleation/Nucléation Introduction to the physics of nucleation Humphrey J. Maris Department of Physics, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA Available online 28 November 2006 Abstract In this introductory article, I review the theory of nucleation by thermal activation and by quantum tunneling. The effect of heterogeneous nucleation at surfaces is discussed and a brief survey of experimental techniques is given. To cite this article: H.J. Maris, C. R. Physique 7 (2006). © 2006 Académie des sciences. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. Résumé Introduction à la physique de la nucléation. Dans cet article introductif, je passe en revue la théorie de la nucléation par activation thermique et par effet tunnel quantique. Je discute les effets de la nucléation hétérogène aux surfaces et je propose un bref survol des techniques expérimentales utilisées. Pour citer cet article : H.J. Maris, C. R. Physique 7 (2006). © 2006 Académie des sciences. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. Keywords: Nucleation; Phase transitions Mots-clés : Nucleation ; Transitions de phase This issue contains a number of reviews all concerning different aspects of nucleation. In this introduction, I briefly summarize the basic theory of nucleation processes and then mention some selected topics of interest. Nucleation means a change in a physical or chemical system that begins within a small region, that is to say, that begins at a nucleus. The very long history of this subject has been reviewed by G.S. Kell [1] who credits Huyghens with having in 1662 performed the first experiments with metastable water under tension.
    [Show full text]
  • Nanoparticle Formation and Coating Using Supercritical Fluids
    Cprht Wrnn & trtn h prht l f th Untd Stt (tl , Untd Stt Cd vrn th n f phtp r thr rprdtn f prhtd trl. Undr rtn ndtn pfd n th l, lbrr nd rhv r thrzd t frnh phtp r thr rprdtn. On f th pfd ndtn tht th phtp r rprdtn nt t b “d fr n prp thr thn prvt td, hlrhp, r rrh. If , r rt fr, r ltr , phtp r rprdtn fr prp n x f “fr tht r b lbl fr prht nfrnnt, h ntttn rrv th rht t rf t pt pn rdr f, n t jdnt, flfllnt f th rdr ld nvlv vltn f prht l. l t: h thr rtn th prht hl th r Inttt f hnl rrv th rht t dtrbt th th r drttn rntn nt: If d nt h t prnt th p, thn lt “ fr: frt p t: lt p n th prnt dl rn h n tn lbrr h rvd f th prnl nfrtn nd ll ntr fr th pprvl p nd brphl th f th nd drttn n rdr t prtt th dntt f I rdt nd flt. ABSTRACT NANOPARTICLE FORMATION AND COATING USING SUPERCRITICAL FLUIDS by Abhijit Aniruddha Gokhale Jet breakup phenomenon and nanoparticle formation The focus of this dissertation is to study the SAS process to manufacture nanoparticles with minimum agglomeration, controlled size and size distribution. Solution jet breakup and solvent evaporation into supercritical fluid (SC CO2) is studied using high speed charged coupled device (CCD) camera facilitated with double shot particle image veloimetry (PIV) laser and a high pressure view cell.
    [Show full text]