DOCSLIB.ORG

Papers of William O. Douglas [Finding Aid]. Library of Congress

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Papers of William O. Douglas [Finding Aid]. Library of Congress William O. Douglas A Register of His Papers in the Library of Congress Prepared by Audrey A. Walker with the assistance of Paul A. Colton, Larry Larsen, and Teresa Salazar Revised and expanded by Audrey A. Walker with the assistance of Patrick Kerwin and Andrew Passett Addition by Patrick Kerwin Revised by Connie L. Cartledge Manuscript Division, Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 2000 Contact information: http://lcweb.loc.gov/rr/mss/address.html Finding aid encoded by Library of Congress Manuscript Division, 2002 Finding aid URL: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/eadmss.ms002011 Latest revision: 2004-08-13 Collection Summary Title: Papers of William O. Douglas Span Dates: 1801-1980 Bulk Dates: (bulk 1923-1975) ID No.: MSS18853 Creator: Douglas, William O. (William Orville), 1898- Size: 634,000 items ; 1783 containers plus 2 classified plus 7 oversize ; 715.6 linear feet Language: Collection material in English Repository: Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. Abstract: Associate justice of the United States Supreme Court, chairman of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and professor of law. Correspondence, speeches and writings, subject files, Supreme Court files, financial records, family papers and genealogy, printed matter, photographs, and other papers documenting Douglas's legal and judicial career, government service, concern for the environment, and other interests. Selected Search Terms The following terms have been used to index the description of this collection in the Library's online catalog. They are grouped by name of person or organization, by subject or location, and by occupation and listed alphabetically therein. Names: Douglas, William O. (William Orville), 1898- Bannerjee, P. K.--Correspondence Bates, George Eugene--Correspondence Bazelon, David T., 1923- --Correspondence Bost, Martha Douglas, b. 1897 --Correspondence Bowmer, Jim D.--Correspondence Clark, Charles Edward, 1889-1963 --Correspondence Clifford, Clark M., 1906- --Correspondence Davis, Sidney M.--Correspondence Dilliard, Irving, 1904- --Correspondence Douglas, Arthur, 1902- --Correspondence Fortas, Abe--Correspondence Frank, Jerome, 1889-1957--Correspondence Gilbert, Elon James, 1897-1978--Correspondence Hamilton, Dagmar S.--Correspondence Hooker, John J.--Correspondence Hutchins, Robert Maynard, 1899- --Correspondence Hoyt, Edwin Palmer--Correspondence Janeway, Eliot--Correspondence Johnson, Lyndon B. (Lyndon Baines), 1908-1973--Correspondence Kennedy, Robert F., 1925-1968--Correspondence Lantz, Robert--Correspondence Maloney, Francis Thomas, 1894-1945--Correspondence Meneely, A. Howard (Alexander Howard), 1899-1961--Correspondence Neuberger, Richard L. (Richard Lewis), 1912-1960--Correspondence Rahul, Ram--Correspondence Rodell, Fred, 1907- --Correspondence Roosevelt, Franklin D. (Franklin Delano), 1882-1945--Correspondence Shanks, Carrol M. (Carrol Meteer), b. 1898 --Correspondence Shubert, J. Howard, d. 1951--Correspondence Smith, Richard J. (Richard Joyce), 1903- --Correspondence Strauss, Helen M. (Helen Marion), d. 1987--Correspondence Tippin, Phil--Correspondence Papers of William O. Douglas 2 Yen, Y. C. James, 1893- --Correspondence United States. Constitution United States. Supreme Court Albert Parvin Foundation Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul, and Pacific Railroad Company Columbia University. School of Law --Faculty Fund for the Republic Harvard Law School--Curricula Harvard University. Graduate School of Business Administration --Curricula Yale Law School--Faculty Subjects: Air--Pollution Bankruptcy--United States Botany Business education--Curricula Business failures--United States Conservation of natural resources Constitutional amendments--United States Corporations--Finance--United States Economic assistance, American--Israel Environmental protection Fundamental education Impeachments--United States Law--Study and teaching Law--Study and teaching--Curricula Plants--Type specimens--Middle East Railroad law--United States Voyages and travels Water--Pollution Wilderness areas Wildlife conservation Chesapeake and Ohio Canal (Md. and Washington, D.C.) United States--Foreign relations--Asia United States--Foreign relations--China United States--Foreign relations--Israel United States--Politics and government--1933-1945 United States--Politics and government--1945-1989 Occupations: Educators Jurists Public officials Administrative Information Provenance: The papers of William O. Douglas, professor of law, Securities and Exchange commissioner, and associate justice of the United States Supreme Court, were acquired by the Library of Congress in three parts. Part I was given by Douglas in several installments between 1960 and 1968. Parts II and III, some of which had been deposited in segments in 1976 and 1977, were bequeathed to the Library in 1980. The remaining papers of the bequest were received in 1980, 1985, and 1997. Small additions were given to the Library by Mrs. A. Howard Meneely in 1961 and John P. Frank in 1998. Papers of William O. Douglas 3 Processing History: Part I of the papers of William O. Douglas was arranged and described in 1987. Additional material received was processed as Part II in 1997 and as Part III in 1998. This register was revised in 2000. Transfers: Items have been transferred from the Manuscript Division to other custodial divisions of the Library. Maps have been transferred to the Geography and Map Division. Sound recordings have been transferred to the Motion Picture, Broadcasting, and Recorded Sound Division. All transfers are identified in these divisions as part of the William O. Douglas Papers. Copyright Status: Between 1960 and 1968 copyright in the unpublished writings of William O. Douglas in Part I of these papers and in other collections of papers in the custody of the Library of Congress was dedicated to the public as each installment was given to the Library. Copyright in the unpublished writings of William O. Douglas in Part II and III of these papers is controlled by the executors of his estate. Security Classified Documents: Government regulations control the use of classified material in this collection. Manuscript Division staff can furnish information concerning access to and use of classified items. Preferred Citation: Researchers wishing to cite this collection should include the following information: Container number and roman numeral designating the Part, William O. Douglas Papers, Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. Biographical Note Date Event 1898, Oct. 16 Born, Maine, Minn. 1904 Family moved to Yakima, Wash. 1920 Received A. B. degree from Whitman College, Walla Walla, Wash. 1920-1922 Teacher, Yakima High School, Yakima, Wash. 1923 Married Mildred Riddle (divorced 1953) 1925 Received LL. B., Columbia University School of Law, New York, N.Y. 1925-1927 Associated with law firm of Cravath, De Gersdorff, Swaine and Wood, New York, N.Y. 1925-1928 Member of faculty, Columbia University School of Law, New York, N.Y. 1928-1936 Professor, Yale Law School, New Haven, Conn. 1929-1932 Conducted various bankruptcy studies for U.S. Department of Commerce, Yale Law School, and Yale Institute of Human Relations 1934-1936 Director, Protective Committee Study, Securities and Exchange Commission 1936-1937 Commissioner, Securities and Exchange Commission Papers of William O. Douglas 4 1937-1939 Chairman, Securities and Exchange Commission 1939-1975 Associate justice, U.S. Supreme Court 1954 Married Mercedes Davidson (divorced 1963) 1963 Married Joan Martin (divorced 1966) 1966 Married Cathleen Heffernan 1975 Retired from U. S. Supreme Court 1980, Jan. 19 Died, Washington, D.C. Scope and Content Note The papers of William Orville Douglas (1898-1980) span the years 1801 to 1980, with the heaviest concentration of material dated between 1923 and 1975. Although the collection is divided into three parts, some topics and time periods are common to all parts. Part I, dating from 1920 to 1953, focuses primarily on Douglas's professional life. Part II forms the bulk of the collection, and although it covers the years 180l to 1980, the earliest Douglas manuscript is dated 19l6. Part III is confined primarily to Douglas's diary and his personal correspondence with other justices of the United States Supreme Court. The collection consists of a small group of family papers, several correspondence series, subject files, speeches and writings, Supreme Court files, financial papers, photographs, miscellany, and printed matter. Douglas's papers are as varied as his many interests and encompass the full scope of his life and career from his college days through his years of retirement from the Supreme Court. Following graduation from Whitman College, Douglas taught for a brief period at the high school in Yakima, Washington. After receiving a degree in law from Columbia University, he served on the faculties of Columbia and Yale law schools. At both law schools he was among a small group of professors who advocated an interdisciplinary rather than the traditional compartmentalized approach to the study of law. This innovative approach is reflected in his papers by two major projects. The first is the comprehensive study of the bankruptcy system and its effect on the social and economic structure of society begun in 1928 as part of a cooperative program between the Yale Law School and the Yale Institute of Human Relations. The study examined business failures in several cities and looked at court rules governing bankruptcy. In 1929 under the combined auspices
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gazette Project Interview with Mort Stern, Georgetown
    Gazette Project Interview with Mort Stern, Georgetown, Colorado, 25 September 2000 Interviewer: Roy Reed Roy Reed: If you would, just say for the benefit of the tape that we have your permission to record this interview. Mort Stern: Yes, of course. I understand that it is being recorded. RR: And that it will be turned over to the University of Arkansas. MS: Right. RR: Mort, what kind of a kid were you? MS: What kind of a kid? Kind of a dream boat, I guess. I wanted to be a baseball player. My great love in life was to be a baseball player. My sideline was to be an artist. My hope was to be trained in art school in case I needed that skill. By that time, my mother had moved my brother and me to New York. I attended the High School of Music and Art, but the teachers said that I had no future as an artist because all my work looked like cartoons. My English teacher, Raymond Sayers, who took a liking to me, said, “Don’t worry. You can write. You can always go into journalism.” Really, I didn’t have any idea of the future except possibly being a baseball player. That was the life! I used to go around with a baseball glove attached to my belt in case I encountered a game. That was me! RR: Where were you born, to whom, and when? 1 MS: I was born in New Haven, Connecticut, February 20, l926. My mother, Louise Eleanor Spiro, had married William Bernard Stern.
    [Show full text]
  • A Battle History of the Imperial Japanese Navy, 1941- 1945, 2013, 424 Pages, Paul S
    A Battle History of the Imperial Japanese Navy, 1941- 1945, 2013, 424 pages, Paul S. Dull, 1612512909, 9781612512907, Naval Institute Press, 2013 DOWNLOAD http://bit.ly/1CUut8i http://goo.gl/ReSfd http://www.abebooks.com/servlet/SearchResults?sts=t&tn=A+Battle+History+of+the+Imperial+Japanese+Navy%2C+1941-+1945&x=51&y=16 For almost 20 years, more than 200 reels of microfilmed Japanese naval records remained in the custody of the U.S. Naval History Division, virtually untouched. This unique book draws on those sources and others to tell the story of the Pacific War from the viewpoint of the Japanese. Former Marine Corps officer and Asian scholar Paul Dull focuses on the major surface engagements of the war--Coral Sea, Midway, the crucial Solomons campaign, and the last-ditch battles in the Marianas and Philippines. Also included are detailed track charts and a selection of Japanese photographs of major vessels and actions. DOWNLOAD http://bit.ly/10HgJTx http://bit.ly/1q1yY7I The Naval Battles for Guadalcanal 1942 Clash for Supremacy in the Pacific, Mark Stille, May 20, 2013, History, 96 pages. The battle for Guadalcanal that lasted from August 1942 to February 1943 was the first major American counteroffensive against the Japanese in the Pacific. The battle of Savo. Combined fleet decoded the secret history of American intelligence and the Japanese Navy in World War II, John Prados, 1995, History, 832 pages. Reveals the important contribution of American codebreakers and intelligence analysts to the nation's victory over Japan during World War II and shows how the Japanese followed.
    [Show full text]
  • Jerome Frank's Impact on American Law
    Michigan Law Review Volume 84 Issue 4 Issues 4&5 1986 The Iconoclast as Reformer: Jerome Frank's Impact on American Law Matthew W. Frank University of Michigan Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr Part of the Judges Commons, and the Legal Biography Commons Recommended Citation Matthew W. Frank, The Iconoclast as Reformer: Jerome Frank's Impact on American Law, 84 MICH. L. REV. 866 (1986). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol84/iss4/29 This Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Law Review at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 866 Michigan Law Review [Vol. 84:861 THE ICONOCLAST AS REFORMER: JEROME FRANK'S IMPACT ON AMERICAN LA w. By Robert Jerome Glennon. Ithaca: Cornell Uni­ versity Press. 1985. Pp. 252. $24.95. In the first half of this century, Jerome Frank achieved prominence as a corporate attorney, a legal realist, a New Deal administrator, and finally as a federal appellate court judge. A study of Frank's career does more than testify to the man's extraordinary breadth of interest, energy, and ability; it serves as a pane through which one may witness the enormous changes in law and legal theory from 1930 to 1957. In The Iconoclast as Reformer: Jerome Frank's Impact on American Law, Professor Robert Glennon 1 traces Frank's career and attempts to evaluate Frank's influence in these areas.
    [Show full text]
  • INDIANA LAW REVIEW [Vol
    . A Short History of Hearsay Reform, with Particular Reference to Hoffman v. Palmer, Eddie Morgan and Jerry Frank Michael Ariens* "Few historians, however, hold themselves out as fictionists." Jerome Frank, The Place ofthe Expert in a Democratic Society 1 True, no man can be wholly apart from his fellows. But, if each of us is a promontory, yet the promontory reaches out beyond the social mainland to a point where others cannot intrude. ... It is a no-other-man's land, for others can't penetrate it, can't communicate with it. Jerome Frank, Judge Learned Hand1 Introduction On my summer vacation, I chanced upon the novel Foe by the South African writer 3 J.M. Coetzee. Foe is a modern reworking of Daniel Defoe's Robinson Crusoe. In this modern retelling, Coetzee presents the story of the relation of author and subject, not the story of the adventures of a shipwrecked Englishman. In Foe, the authorial voice is that of Susan Barton, a castaway who ended up on the same island as Cruso and Friday. She, Cruso and Friday are "rescued" and taken by ship to England. En route, Cruso dies. Once in London, Susan Barton takes her story of Cruso and Friday to Daniel Foe, and finds that his interest is more in the story of her life and less in the story of Cruso 's adventures. Foe, chased by creditors, flees his house, into which Barton and Friday move. Barton later leaves, searching for Foe, whom she finally tracks down. Confronting Foe, 4 she says, "I am not a story, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Alex S. Vitale
    The End of Policing The End of Policing Alex S. Vitale First published by Verso 2017 © Alex S. Vitale 2017 All rights reserved The moral rights of the author have been asserted 1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2 Verso UK: 6 Meard Street, London W1F 0EG US: 20 Jay Street, Suite 1010, Brooklyn, NY 11201 versobooks.com Verso is the imprint of New Left Books ISBN-13: 978-1-78478-289-4 ISBN-13: 978-1-78478-291-7 (US EBK) ISBN-13: 978-1-78478-290-0 (UK EBK) British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Vitale, Alex S., author. Title: The end of policing / Alex Vitale. Description: Brooklyn : Verso, 2017. Identifiers: LCCN 2017020713 | ISBN 9781784782894 (hardback) | ISBN 9781784782917 (US ebk) | ISBN 9781784782900 (UK ebk) Subjects: LCSH: Police—United States. | Police misconduct—United States. | BISAC: POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Freedom & Security / Law Enforcement. | SOCIAL SCIENCE / Discrimination & Race Relations. | POLITICAL SCIENCE / Public Policy / General. Classification: LCC HV8139 .V58 2017 | DDC 363.20973—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017020713 Typeset in Sabon by MJ & N Gavan, Truro, Cornwall Printed in the US by Maple Press Contents 1. The Limits of Police Reform 2. The Police Are Not Here to Protect You 3. The School-to-Prison Pipeline 4. “We Called for Help, and They Killed My Son” 5. Criminalizing Homelessness 6. The Failures of Policing Sex Work 7. The War on Drugs 8. Gang Suppression 9.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Investor Tom C.W
    The New Investor Tom C.W. Lin EVIEW R ABSTRACT A sea change is happening in finance. Machines appear to be on the rise and humans on LA LAW LA LAW the decline. Human endeavors have become unmanned endeavors. Human thought and UC human deliberation have been replaced by computerized analysis and mathematical models. Technological advances have made finance faster, larger, more global, more interconnected, and less human. Modern finance is becoming an industry in which the main players are no longer entirely human. Instead, the key players are now cyborgs: part machine, part human. Modern finance is transforming into what this Article calls cyborg finance. This Article offers one of the first broad, descriptive, and normative examinations of this sea change and its wide-ranging effects on law, society, and finance. The Article begins by placing the rise of artificial intelligence and computerization in finance within a larger social context. Next, it explores the evolution and birth of a new investor paradigm in law precipitated by that rise. This Article then identifies and addresses regulatory dangers, challenges, and consequences tied to the increasing reliance on artificial intelligence and computers. Specifically, it warns of emerging financial threats in cyberspace, examines new systemic risks linked to speed and connectivity, studies law’s capacity to govern this evolving financial landscape, and explores the growing resource asymmetries in finance. Finally, drawing on themes from the legal discourse about the choice between rules and standards, this Article closes with a defense of humans in an uncertain financial world in which machines continue to rise, and it asserts that smarter humans working with smart machines possess the key to better returns and better futures.
    [Show full text]
  • Jerome Frank's Fact-Skepticism and Our Future*
    JEROME FRANK'S FACT-SKEPTICISM AND OUR FUTURE* EDMOND GAHNt I WHEN Dean Rostow asked me to describe the main features of Jerome Frank's legal philosophy, I resolved that-no matter how tentative my sum- mary might be-I must speak in the perspective of the future. For one thing, this is the way he habitually faced and spoke and wrote; it is the way to be faithful to his thought. For another, his philosophy-which he called "fact- skepticism"'-is nothing more or less than a bold confrontation of the future and a flinging of gages at its feet. I believe that Jerome Frank's fact-skepti- cism represents an epoch-making contribution not only to legal theory and procedural reform, but also to the understanding of the entire human condition. The history of our time will record whether we profited by the challenges he bequeathed to us. For about twenty-five years Jerome Frank's coruscating and marvelously restless mind planned and built and developed the meaning of fact-skepticism. Fully aware that his approach was novel, he deliberately repeated and reiter- ated his doctrines, phrased them first this way then that, and summoned analogies from every corner of the cultural world to make his ideas clearer. To justify the repetitions, he used the following story: "Mr. Smith of Denver was introduced to Mr. Jones at a dinner party in Chicago. 'Oh,' said Jones, 'do you know my friend Mr. Schnicklefritz, who lives in Denver?' 'No,' answered Smith. Later in the evening, when Smith referred to Denver, Jones again asked whether Smith was ac- quainted with Schnicklefritz, and again received a negative reply.
    [Show full text]
  • Lewis and Clark: the Unheard Voices
    Curriculum Connections A free online publication for K-12 educators provided by ADL’s A World of Difference® Institute. www.adl.org/lesson-plans © 1993 by George Littlechild UPDATED 2019 Lewis and Clark: The Unheard Voices CURRICULUM CONNECTIONS | UPDATED FALL 2019 2 In This Issue The disadvantage of [people] not knowing the past is that they do Contents not know the present. History is a hill or high point of vantage, from which alone [they] see the town in which they live or the age Alignment of Lessons to Common —G. K. Chesterson, author (1874–1936) in which they are living. Core Anchor Standards Each year classrooms across the U.S. study, re-enact, and celebrate the Lewis and Clark expedition, a journey that has become an emblematic symbol of Lessons American fortitude and courage. While there are many aspects of the “Corps of Elementary School Lesson Discovery” worthy of commemoration—the triumph over geographical obstacles, the appreciation and cataloging of nature, and the epic proportions Middle School Lesson of the journey—this is only part of the history. High School Lesson While Lewis and Clark regarded the West as territory “on which the foot of civilized man had never trodden,” this land had been home for centuries to Resources millions of Native Americans from over 170 nations. For the descendants of Tribal Nations Whose Homeland these people, celebrations of the Corps of Discovery mark the onset of an era Lewis and Clark Explored of brutal repression, genocide and the destruction of their culture. Resources for Educators and Students The lesson plans in this issue of Curriculum Connections take an in-depth look at the history of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Antitrust and Baseball: Stealing Holmes
    Antitrust and Baseball: Stealing Holmes Kevin McDonald 1. introduction this: It happens every spring. The perennial hopefulness of opening day leads to talk of LEVEL ONE: “Justice Holmes baseball, which these days means the business ruled that baseball was a sport, not a of baseball - dollars and contracts. And business.” whether the latest topic is a labor dispute, al- LEVEL TWO: “Justice Holmes held leged “collusion” by owners, or a franchise that personal services, like sports and considering a move to a new city, you eventu- law and medicine, were not ‘trade or ally find yourself explaining to someone - commerce’ within the meaning of the rather sheepishly - that baseball is “exempt” Sherman Act like manufacturing. That from the antitrust laws. view has been overruled by later In response to the incredulous question cases, but the exemption for baseball (“Just how did that happen?”), the customary remains.” explanation is: “Well, the famous Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. decided that baseball was exempt from the antitrust laws in a case called The truly dogged questioner points out Federal Baseball Club ofBaltimore 1.: National that Holmes retired some time ago. How can we League of Professional Baseball Clubs,‘ and have a baseball exemption now, when the an- it’s still the law.” If the questioner persists by nual salary for any pitcher who can win fifteen asking the basis for the Great Dissenter’s edict, games is approaching the Gross National Prod- the most common responses depend on one’s uct of Guam? You might then explain that the level of antitrust expertise, but usually go like issue was not raised again in the courts until JOURNAL 1998, VOL.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Supremacy and the Modest Constitution
    Judicial Supremacy and the Modest Constitution Frederick Schauert INTRODUCTION Judicial supremacy is under attack. From various points on the politi- cal spectrum, political actors as well as academics have challenged the idea that the courts in general, and the Supreme Court in particular, have a spe- cial and preeminent responsibility in interpreting and enforcing the Constitution. Reminding us that treating Supreme Court interpretations of the Constitution as supreme and authoritative has no grounding in constitu- tional text and not much more in constitutional history, these critics seek to relocate the prime source of interpretive guidance. The courts have an important role to play, these critics acknowledge, but it is a role neither greater than that played by other branches, nor greater than the role to be played by "the people themselves."' The critics' understanding of a more limited function for the judiciary in constitutional interpretation appears to rest, however, primarily on a highly contestable conception of the point of having a written constitution in the first place. According to this conception, a constitution, and espe- cially the Constitution of the United States, is the vehicle by which a de- mocratic polity develops its own fundamental values. A constitution, therefore, becomes both a statement of our most important values and the vehicle through which these values are created and crystallized. Under this conception of the role of a written constitution, it would indeed be a mis- take to believe that the courts should have the preeminent responsibility for interpreting that constitution. For this task of value generation to devolve Copyright © 2004 California Law Review, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(B) Is Unconstitutional
    SYMPOSIUM ARTICLE TWOMBLY IN CONTEXT: WHY FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 4(B) IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL E. Donald Elliott Abstract Rule 4(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure delegates to private parties state authority to compel a person to appear and answer civil charges in court without any preliminary state review or screening for reasonableness. This is argued to be unconstitutional as a unreasonable seizure of the person, a deprivation of private property without due process, and a standardless delegation of state power to a private party with a financial interest. The history of the writ of summons is reviewed. From the Founding until 1938, federal courts reviewed the grounds proposed for suit prior to service of a summons ordering someone to come to court to answer charges. It is argued that unless courts routinely award full economic costs after the fact to make someone whole who has been sued wrongfully, they must satisfy themselves in advance that there is a reasonable basis for suit before ordering the persons sued to appear and answer. Rule 4(b) is argued to be unconstitutional as (1) a seizure of the person and property of the defendant without any attempt by the state to verify that it is reasonable to do so; (2) an unconstitutional deprivation of property without due process of law; (3) an unconstitutional delegation of state power to issue a court order to a private party with a financial interest, and (4) an unconstitutional repeal of a statute providing for judicial control over process without following constitutionally required procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Yale Law School 2019–2020
    BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY BULLETIN OF YALE BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Periodicals postage paid New Haven ct 06520-8227 New Haven, Connecticut Yale Law School 2019–2020 Yale Law School Yale 2019–2020 BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Series 115 Number 11 August 10, 2019 BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Series 115 Number 11 August 10, 2019 (USPS 078-500) The University is committed to basing judgments concerning the admission, education, is published seventeen times a year (one time in May and October; three times in June and employment of individuals upon their qualifications and abilities and a∞rmatively and September; four times in July; five times in August) by Yale University, 2 Whitney seeks to attract to its faculty, sta≠, and student body qualified persons of diverse Avenue, New Haven CT 06510. Periodicals postage paid at New Haven, Connecticut. backgrounds. In accordance with this policy and as delineated by federal and Connecticut law, Yale does not discriminate in admissions, educational programs, or employment Postmaster: Send address changes to Bulletin of Yale University, against any individual on account of that individual’s sex, race, color, religion, age, PO Box 208227, New Haven CT 06520-8227 disability, status as a protected veteran, or national or ethnic origin; nor does Yale discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity or expression. Managing Editor: Kimberly M. Go≠-Crews University policy is committed to a∞rmative action under law in employment of Editor: Lesley K. Baier women, minority group members, individuals with disabilities, and protected veterans. PO Box 208230, New Haven CT 06520-8230 Inquiries concerning these policies may be referred to Valarie Stanley, Director of the O∞ce for Equal Opportunity Programs, 221 Whitney Avenue, 4th Floor, 203.432.0849.
    [Show full text]