<<

52 Notornis, 2007, Vol. 54: 52-54 0029-4470 © The Ornithological Society of , Inc.

SHORT NOTE

North Island (Callaeas cinerea wilsoni IHHGRQÀD[ tenax) nectar on Tiritiri Matangi Island, , New Zealand

ROSE THOROGOOD School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand Present address: 11 Westridge Rd, Titirangi, Auckland [email protected]

TAMARA HENRY Department of Conservation, Warkworth Area, Auckland Conservancy, Auckland, New Zealand

SIMON FORDHAM Supporters of Tiritiri Matangi Inc., Auckland, New Zealand

The North Is kokako (Callaeas cinerea wilsoni) is an kokako to Tiritiri Matangi was controversial, because endangered member of the New Zealand endemic the island lacked the large areas of structurally ŠĴ•Ž‹’›ȱŠ–’•¢ȱǻCallaeatidae). Typically described complex forest thought to be necessary to sustain a as being omnivorous (e.g., Best & Bellingham 1990; population of kokako (Jones 2000). Powlesland 1987), kokako eat predominantly fruit During routine Department of Conservation Š—ȱ •ŽŠŸŽœǰȱ ‹žȱ ̘ Ž›œǰȱ –˜œœǰȱ Š—ȱ ’—œŽŒœȱ ŒŠ—ȱ ‹Žȱ ǻ˜Ǽȱ –˜—’˜›’—ȱ ˜ȱ ”˜”Š”˜ȱ ‹›ŽŽ’—ȱ ŠĴŽ–™œǰȱ important depending on their availability (Innes et and casual ornithological observation, 10 of 14 al. in press) and the time of year (Powlesland 1987). individually colour-banded kokako were observed Despite its being widely distributed across the ŽŽ’—ȱ ˜—ȱ ̊¡ȱ —ŽŒŠ›ȱ ž›’—ȱ ‘Žȱ œ™›’—ȱ ˜ȱ ŘŖŖśǯȱ ˜›‘ȱ œ•Š—ȱ‹Ž˜›Žȱž›˜™ŽŠ—ȱœŽĴ•Ž–Ž—ȱǻ ——Žœȱet in general feed on nectar either by destructive al.ȱ’—ȱ™›ŽœœǼǰȱ‘Žȱ”˜”Š”˜ȱ’œȱ—˜ ȱ›Žœ›’ŒŽȱ˜ȱœŒŠĴŽ›Žȱ œŠ–™•’—ȱ ˜ȱ ̘ Ž›œǰȱ ˜›ȱ ‹¢ȱ Ž—Ž›’—ȱ ‘Žȱ Œ˜›˜••Šȱ ˜ȱ •˜ŒŠ’˜—œȱ˜—ȱ‘Žȱ–Š’—•Š—ȱ‹ŽŒŠžœŽȱ˜ȱ‘ŽȱŽěŽŒœȱ˜ȱ ‘Žȱ ̘ Ž›ȱ ™Šœœ’—ȱ ‹¢ȱ ‘Žȱ œ’–Šȱ Š—ȱ œŠ–Ž—œȱ introduced mammalian pests and competitors, (Newstrom & Robertson 2005). The 2nd method and habitat clearance (Innes et al. 2006). Several ›Žœž•œȱ ’—ȱ ‘Žȱ ›Š—œŽ›ȱ ˜ȱ ™˜••Ž—ȱ ›˜–ȱ ‘Žȱ ̘ Ž›ȱ ŠĴŽ–™œȱ ‘ŠŸŽȱ ‹ŽŽ—ȱ –ŠŽȱ ˜ȱ ’—›˜žŒŽȱ ”˜”Š”˜ȱ ˜ȱ to the head of the , presumably facilitating ˜ěȬœ‘˜›Žȱ’œ•Š—œǰȱŠ—ȱŜȱ”˜”Š”˜ȱ Ž›Žȱ›Š—œŽ››Žȱ˜ȱ pollination. We observed kokako feeding directly Tiritiri Matangi I from Mangatutu (via a breeding ˜—ȱ̊¡ȱ̘ Ž›œȱǻ’ǯȱŗǼǰȱŠ—ȱ ’‘ȱ̊¡ȱ™˜••Ž—ȱȃŒŠ™œȄȱ programme at Mt Bruce National Wildlife Centre) on their foreheads. To our knowledge, kokako have and Mapara in 1997-98 (Innes & Flux 1999). The not previously been described feeding in this fashion habitat of Tiritiri Matangi I consists of a mosaic of ˜—ȱ ̊¡ȱ —ŽŒŠ›ȱ ǻ ˜‘—ȱ ——Žœǰȱ ™Ž›œǯȱ Œ˜––ǯǼǯ‘Ž’›ȱ replanted and regenerating forest, 10-20 years old. feeding methods appeared to be identical to those The predominant planted were pohutukawa žœŽȱ‹¢ȱ‘Žȱ›ŽŒ˜—’œŽȱ—Š’ŸŽȱ™˜••’—Š˜›œȱ˜ȱ̊¡ǰȱž’ȱ (Metrosideros excelsa), mahoe (Ž•’Œ¢žœȱ ›Š–’Ě˜›žœ), (Prosthemadera novaeseelandiae), bellbird (Anthornis cabbage (Cordyline australis), and New Zealand melanura), both honeyeaters (Meliphagidae), and the ̊¡ȱǻPhormium tenax). In addition, there are 4 small (hihi: Notiomystis cincta) (Craig & Stewart areas of remnant broadleaf coastal forest, whose 1988). The stitchbird has recently been transferred canopies are dominated by (Dysoxylum to its own family (Notiomystidae), which is perhaps spectabile), pohutukawa (Metrosideros excelsa), and most closely related to the Callaeatidae (Driskell et taraire (). The introduction of al. 2007). Before our observations, kokako have been recorded feeding on nectar of rewarewa (Knightia excelsa) and puriri ( lucens), albeit Received 25 March 2006; 30 September 2006 at very low rates such as 1% of the diet of 19 Short note 53

Fig. 1 North Is kokako (Callaeas cinerea wilsoniǼȱŽŽ’—ȱ˜—ȱ̊¡ȱ (Phormium tenax) nectar on Tiritiri Matangi Island. Note pollen on forehead of bird. Photo: S. Fordham.

individuals in Puketi forest (Powlesland 1987). This most of the Tiritiri Matangi I population feeds on contrasts with our observations where all birds a hitherto unrecognised food type demonstrates were seen commonly either actually feeding, or that this species can inhabit low, shrubby, and ’‘ȱ ̊¡ȱ ™˜••Ž—ȱ ™•ž–ŠŽǯȱ ‘Žȱ ̘›Š•ȱ Š›Œ‘’ŽŒž›Žȱ structurally simple habitat. The observations also ˜ȱ̊¡ȱ’쎛œȱ›˜–ȱ™ž›’›’ȱŠ—ȱ›Ž Š›Ž Šȱ’—ȱ‘Šȱ‘Žȱ highlight the importance of not assuming a species œ‘Š™ŽȱŠ—ȱœ’£Žȱ˜ȱ‘Žȱ̘ Ž›œȱ›Žšž’›Žœȱ‹’›œȱ˜ȱ‘ŠŸŽȱ habitat requirements are limited to those where a long brush-like tongue to access the nectar while they survive today. making contact with pollen (Craig & Stewart 1988). •‘˜ž‘ȱ ’ȱ ’œȱ —˜ȱ Šœȱ ꗎȱ Šœȱ ‘Žȱ ‹›žœ‘ȱ Ž—ȱ ˜ȱ ‘Žȱ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS tongue of the honeyeaters, the tongue of the kokako These observations were made while under employment does end in a ‘yard broom’-like brush (McCann by DoC (TH), and by the Zoological Society of London 1964), which potential allows kokako to incorporate (RT). John Innes and Doug Armstrong discussed ideas, more nectar in their diet than was previously and Sandra Anderson, Luis Ortiz Catedral, and Kevin thought. Parker provided helpful comments on thes manuscript. We Conservation management of kokako has thank the Department of Conservation and the Supporters of Tiritiri Matangi Island for providing support and tended to focus on their being primarily a species of accommodation while we were on the island. mature, complex forest (Innes & Flux 1999), where ‘Ž¢ȱŠ›Žȱž—•’”Ž•¢ȱ˜ȱŽ—Œ˜ž—Ž›ȱ̊¡ǯȱ ˜ ŽŸŽ›ǰȱ˜ž‘ȱ œȱ”˜”Š”˜ȱ˜ĞŽ—ȱŒŠ–Žȱ˜ —ȱ˜ȱŸŽŽŠ‹•ŽȱŠ›Ž—œȱ˜ȱ LITERATURE CITED early New Zealanders (C.E. Douglas in Pascoe 1957), Best, H.A.; Bellingham, P.J. 1990. A habitat survey of North Island kokako, in Puketi Forest, Northland. Department and were also observed feeding at forest-scrub edges of Conservation Science & Research series 17. Wellington, (McLean 1912) and in subalpine shrubland (Worthy Department of Conservation. & Holdaway 2002). Although our observations Craig, J.L.; Stewart, A.M. 1988. Reproductive biology of may indicate some behavioural plasticity to novel Phormium tenax: a honeyeater-pollinated species. New environments, they also highlight that the species Zealand journal of botany 26: 453-463. may have inhabited much more varied habitats Driskell, A.; Christidis, L.; Gill, B. J.; Boles, W.E.; Barker, K.; than where they are now found. Currently there are Longmore, N.W. 2007. A new endemic family of New 18 kokako on Tiritiri Matangi I (having increased Zealand birds: adding heat to a biodiversity from the 6 introduced) and interestingly, they hotspot. Australian journal of zoology 55: 73–78 Innes, J.; Flux, I. 1999. North Island kokako recovery plan appear to prefer foraging and nesting in areas of 1999-2009. Wellington, Department of Conservation. replanted and regenerating forest, rather than in ——Žœǰȱ ǯDzȱ•ž¡ǰȱ ǯDzȱ˜••ŽœǰȱǯDzȱŠŠœǰȱ ǯDzȱŠĴ‘Ž ǰȱ ǯǯȱŘŖŖŜǯȱ the mature remnants (Jones 2000). One of the stated Callaeas cinerea Kokako. In: Higgins, P.J.; Peter, research questions of the kokako recovery plan J.M.; Cowling, S.J. (ed.) Handbook of Australian, New (Innes & Flux 1999) is to determine what is ‘good’ Zealand and Antarctic Birds, Vol. 7: Boatbill to starlings. habitat for kokako. Our observations that show that Melbourne, Oxford University Press. 54 Short Note

Jones, R. 2000. Behavioural ecology and habitat requirements Powlesland, R.G. 1987. The foods, foraging behaviour and of kokako (Callaeas cinerea wilsoni) on Tiritiri Matangi habitat use of North Island Kokako in Puketi State Island. Unpubl. MSc thesis, University of Auckland, Forest, Northland. New Zealand journal of ecology 10: Auckland, New Zealand. 117-128. McCann, C. 1964. Observations on the tongues of some Worthy, T.H.; Holdaway, R.N. 2002. Lost world of the : New Zealand birds. Notornis 11: 36-45 prehistoric life in New Zealand Bloomington, Indian McLean, J.C. 1912. Bush-. Emu 11: University Press, and Christchurch, Canterbury 223-236. University Press. Newstrom, L.; Robertson, A. 2005. Progress in understanding pollination systems in New Zealand. New Zealand Keywords North Island kokako; Callaeas cinerea wilsoni; journal of botany 43: 1-59. Ž ȱŽŠ•Š—ȱ̊¡DzȱPhormium tenaxDzȱ™˜••’—Š’˜—Dzȱ̘ Ž›Dzȱ Pascoe, J. (ed.) 1957. Mr Explorer Douglas. Wellington, Reed. nectar; historical distribution; Tiritiri Matangi Island

Notornis, 2007, Vol. 54: 54-55 0029-4470 © The Ornithological Society of New Zealand, Inc.

SHORT NOTE

Cattle egrets (Bubulcus ibis) and other vagrant birds in Fiji

GUY DUTSON ’›’Žȱ —Ž›—Š’˜—Š•ȱħ’ȱ™›˜›Š––Žǰȱ ǯǯǯȱ˜¡ȱŗŞřřŘǰȱžŸŠǰȱħ’ Present address: Birds Australia, 60 Leicester St, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia [email protected]

DICK WATLING —Ÿ’›˜—–Ž—ȱ˜—œž•Š—œȱħ’ǰȱǯǯȱ˜¡ȱŘŖŚŗǰȱ ˜ŸŽ›—–Ž—ȱž’•’—œǰȱžŸŠǰȱħ’

’›’Žȱ —Ž›—Š’˜—Š•ȱœž›ŸŽ¢Žȱ‹’›œȱ’—ȱħ’ȱ›˜–ȱŒȱ “˜ •ȱŽ¡Ž—’—ȱž—Ž›ȱ‘Žȱ‹’••Ȭ‹ŠœŽǰȱŠ—ȱ˜›Š—ŽȬ‹žěȱ 2002 to Aug 2005 to identify the country’s Important head, neck, and mantle. All 8 were seen again on 26 Bird Areas (IBAs). Most surveys were undertaken Dec 2005 and on at least 6 other intermediate dates in wet forest, focussing on threatened and endemic ǻ‹¢ǰȱŸŠ›’˜žœ•¢ǰȱ ž¢ȱ žœ˜—ǰȱ ’˜—ȱ ˜‹Œ›˜ĞȦǰȱ birds. A few small seabird-nesting islands were Digger Jackson, Richard Thomas/Birdquest, and surveyed and other incidental birdwatching was Dick Watling). Many visits were made to the airport concentrated around Suva. Although many new between these dates and the birds were clearly not data were collected on the resident birds, only 2 present, probably in the extensive agricultural new vagrant species were recorded. This suggests ™ŠŒ‘ ˜›”ǰȱ ’—Œ•ž’—ȱ ŒŠĴ•ŽȬ™Šœž›Žœǰȱ Š›˜ž—ȱ ‘Šȱ ‘Žȱ ‹’›œȱ ˜ȱ ħ’ȱ ‘ŠŸŽȱ ‹ŽŽ—ȱ ›Ž•Š’ŸŽ•¢ȱ Ž••Ȭ Nausori. In Oct and Nov 2003, all were in breeding documented (excepting pelagic seabirds which ™•ž–ŠŽǰȱ‹žȱ—˜—Žȱ ŠœȱœŽŽ—ȱ ’‘ȱŒ˜ž›œ‘’™Ȭ̞œ‘Žȱ were very poorly covered by the BirdLife surveys). ‹Š›ŽȬ™Š›œǯȱ‘’œȱ’œȱ‘Žȱꛜȱ›ŽŒ˜›ȱ˜›ȱħ’ǯȱ‘Ž›ŽȱŠ›Žȱ ‘ŽœŽȱ ›ŽŒ˜›œȱ ž™ŠŽȱ ‘Žȱ ›ŽŸ’Ž ȱ ˜ȱ ħ’Ȃœȱ‹’›œȱ ’—ȱ several records of small groups in New Caledonia, Watling (2001) but not breeding (Barré & Dutson 2000; Barré & —ȱ Řśȱ Œȱ ŘŖŖřǰȱ Šȱ ̘Œ”ȱ ˜ȱ Şȱ ŒŠĴ•Žȱ Ž›Žœȱ Bachy 2003). This species has become a regular non- (Bubulcus ibis) was found on the short grassland of breeding visitor from Australia to New Zealand, Šžœ˜›’ȱ Š’›™˜›ȱ Šȱ žŸŠǯȱ ‘Ž¢ȱ Ž›Žȱ ’Ž—’ꮍȱ ‹¢ȱ and to Norfolk and Lord Howe Is (Marchant & their small size, stout build, stout bill with a small Higgins 1990; MacAllan et al. 2004). ‘Žȱ ˜—•¢ȱ œ™ŽŒ’Žœȱ ˜ȱ —Šž›Š••¢ȱ Œ˜•˜—’œŽȱ ħ’ȱ ’—ȱ historical times is the white-faced heron (Ardea Received 27 February 2006; 31 October 2006 novaehollandiaeǼǯȱ ȱ Œ˜•˜—’œŽȱ ħ’ȱ ’—ȱ ŗşşŝȱ ǻŠ•’—ȱ