The Public Playing of Music in Restaurants and Businesses

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Public Playing of Music in Restaurants and Businesses Stop the Music, I Want My Royalty — The Public Playing of Music in Restaurants and Businesses Robert B. Goss, J.D., LL.M. Candidate IPIL Fall 2007 Professor Craig Joyce (Advisor) University of Houston Law Center ABSTRACT In 1790, the founding fathers originally did not provide specific copyright protection in the United States to musical works, musical compositions, or sound recordings. However, as the technological and political developments occurred in the United States the original copyright protection provided in Article I, § 8, cl. 8 expanded to include music. The first protection for music occurred with the enactment of the 1831 Act. Over time, Congress and the Courts supplied additional factors for copyright protection of musical compositions culminating in the 1976 Copyright Act. The Fairness in Music Licensing Act made further revisions in 1998. The passage of the Fairness in Music Licensing Act drew an immediate attack from both United States musical composition and sound recording copyright owners and a unified European Community. At stake was the copyright owners’ individual exclusive right for a royalty and their ability to collect royalties. The Fairness in Music Licensing Act created a business exception that provided the exemption for any business under 2,000 square feet and any restaurant under 3,750 square feet when copyrighted works were played as a public performance over a sound system connected to a radio. This paper examines the conflict between the U.S. Copyright Act with its homestyle and business exceptions and the obligations created between the European Community and other international trading partners through the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property (TRIPS) agreement. Further, the U.S. copyright law has to catch up to the technological changes in the music industry. Inclusion of these changes may provide a solution to the U.S. liability imposed by the World Trade Organization (WTO) regarding the present U.S. Copyright Act. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................ii I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................... 1 II. MUSIC COPYRIGHT DEVELOPMENTS: THE BEGINNINGS THROUGH 1909....... 1 A. The U.S. Constitution and Copyright Development....................................................... 1 1. Copyright law development immediately after winning Independence from England.................................................................................................................... 3 B. Legislation Prior to the 1976 Copyright Act................................................................... 4 1. 1790 Copyright Act ................................................................................................ 4 2. 1831 Copyright Act ................................................................................................ 7 3. 1909 Act ................................................................................................................11 III. MUSIC COPYRIGHT DEVELOPMENTS FROM 1976 TO 2007: AN OVERVIEW 14 A. The Digital Performance Right in Sound Recordings Act of 1995 (DPRSR) ............14 B. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) of 1999...........................................16 C. The Fairness in Music Licensing Act (FMLA) of 1998...............................................17 D. Summary of Other U.S. Laws Applicable to Businesses and Restaurants .................18 IV. TITLE 17 TODAY: MUSIC PROTECTIONS.................................................................19 A. Congressional Purpose of Act........................................................................................20 B. 1976 Copyright Code: 17 U.S.C....................................................................................21 1. § 102 — Subject Matter of Copyright: in General .............................................21 2. Prima Facie Copyright Elements.........................................................................21 a. Authorship and Originality ..................................................................................22 b. Fixation in a Tangible Form ................................................................................24 3. §103, Subject Matter of Copyright: Compilations & Derivative Works ..........25 4. §101, Definitions ..................................................................................................26 5. §106, Exclusive Rights in Copyrighted Works ..................................................33 iii V. TITLE 17 TODAY: MUSIC LIMITATIONS (§§ 107-122)..........................................35 A. Limitations That Do Not Affect the Playing of Music in Businesses or Restaurants 35 B. Limitations That Do Affect the Playing of Music in Businesses or Restaurants........37 1. § 107 — Fair Use..................................................................................................37 2. § 109 — Limitations on Exclusive Use: Effect of Transfer of Particular Copy or Phonorecord......................................................................................................39 3. § 110 — Limitations on Exclusive Use: Exemptions of Certain Performances and Displays..........................................................................................................43 4. § 111 — Limitations on exclusive rights: secondary transmissions .................52 5. § 112 — Limitations on exclusive rights: Ephemeral recordings .....................53 6. § 114 — Scope of exclusive rights in sound recordings....................................53 7. § 115 — the compulsory license .........................................................................54 8. § 118 — Exclusive rights: use of certain works in connection with noncommercial broadcasting ...............................................................................56 9. Summary of the provisions of the 1976 Copyright Act applicable to businesses and restaurants playing music..............................................................................57 VI. ADMINISTRATION RIGHTS AND ENFORCEMENT ..................................................58 A. §501 — Infringement of Copyright...............................................................................58 B. Performance Rights.........................................................................................................59 1. Performance vs. performing......................................................................................61 C. Record Companies and Musical Publishers..................................................................62 D. Performance Right Societies ..........................................................................................62 E. Harry Fox Agency ..........................................................................................................63 VII. INTERNATIONAL DISPUTE WITH THE U.S. AS LITIGATED IN WTO DS160. 64 A. The European Community had issues with the U.S. over the FMLA .........................64 B. TRIPS and Berne Article 9(1)........................................................................................68 C. TRIPS Article 13.............................................................................................................69 D. Berne Article 13..............................................................................................................72 E. Berne Article 11bis .........................................................................................................73 F. Berne Article 11..............................................................................................................74 iv VIII. ANALYSIS ..........................................................................................................................75 A. U.S. Case law for Homestyle Exceptions (§ 110(5)(A)) and Business Exception (§ 110(5)(B))........................................................................................................................76 1. Buck v. Jewell-LaSalle Realty Company.............................................................76 2. Twentieth Century Music Corp. v. Aiken ............................................................77 3. Sailor Music v. The Gap Stores ...........................................................................79 4. Springsteen v. Plaza Roller Dome.......................................................................80 5. Broadcast Music, Inc. v. United States Shoe Corporation ................................81 6. Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Jeep Sales & Service Co.............................................82 7. Crabshaw Music v. K-Bob’s of El Paso Inc. ......................................................84 B. Summary of U.S. Case law Applicable to Business and Restaurants .........................85 C. Discussion of 17 U.S.C. § 110(5)(A) & (B) Violations in Regards to TRIPS ...........85 IX. CONCLUSION............................................................................................................................ 86 Bibliography ..........................................................................................................................91 v STOP THE MUSIC, I WANT MY ROYALTY: THE PLAYING OF MUSIC IN PUBLIC RESTAURANTS AND BUSINESSES I. INTRODUCTION Copyright protection in the United States started almost immediately
Recommended publications
  • Gr. 4 to 8 Study Guide
    Toronto Symphony TS Orchestra Gr. 4 to 8 Study Guide Conductors for the Toronto Symphony Orchestra School Concerts are generously supported by Mrs. Gert Wharton. The Toronto Symphony Orchestra’s School Concerts are generously supported by The William Birchall Foundation and an anonymous donor. Click on top right of pages to return to the table of contents! Table of Contents Concert Overview Concert Preparation Program Notes 3 4 - 6 7 - 11 Lesson Plans Artist Biographies MusicalGlossary 12 - 38 39 - 42 43 - 44 Instruments in Musicians Teacher & Student the Orchestra of the TSO Evaluation Forms 45 - 56 57 - 58 59 - 60 The Toronto Symphony Orchestra gratefully acknowledges Pierre Rivard & Elizabeth Hanson for preparing the lesson plans included in this guide - 2 - Concert Overview No two performances will be the same Play It by Ear! in this laugh-out-loud interactive February 26-28, 2019 concert about improvisation! Featuring Second City alumni, and hosted by Suitable for grades 4–8 Kevin Frank, this delightfully funny show demonstrates improvisatory techniques Simon Rivard, Resident Conductor and includes performances of orchestral Kevin Frank, host works that were created through Second City Alumni, actors improvisation. Each concert promises to Talisa Blackman, piano be one of a kind! Co-production with the National Arts Centre Orchestra Program to include excerpts from*: • Mozart: Overture to The Marriage of Figaro • Rimsky-Korsakov: Scheherazade, Op. 35, Mvt. 2 (Excerpt) • Copland: Variations on a Shaker Melody • Beethoven: Symphony No. 3, Mvt. 4 (Excerpt) • Holst: St. Pauls Suite, Mvt. 4 *Program subject to change - 3 - Concert Preparation Let's Get Ready! Your class is coming to Roy Thomson Hall to see and hear the Toronto Symphony Orchestra! Here are some suggestions of what to do before, during, and after the performance.
    [Show full text]
  • An Explorer's Guide: Spell Songs
    SINGING NATURE BACK TO LIFE thelostwords.org 1 AN EXPLORER’S GUIDE: SPELL SONGS A COMPANION TO THE LOST WORDS’ EXPLORER’S PACK AND CHALLENGE CARDS. The pack provides a wide range of suggestions to embrace a cross-curricular approach, encouraging constructive curiosity and suggesting a variety of ways of communicating and responding creatively, using a wide range of interdisciplinary skills. Suggestions are made for individual and collaborative work, with the opportunity for some activities to involve the wider community. It is an exploration of the whole range of beautiful musical responses by eight musicians to the art and words of Jackie Morris and Robert Macfarlane, together with the new spells and paintings that appear in this artefact. The overwhelming and widespread response to The Lost Words and Spell Songs also offers a heartening opportunity for the redevelopment of a strong shared poetic and musical culture, rooted in an awareness of our environment, both local and beyond, something which has been eroding over time, brought about by the loss – of words, the ability to name, the capacity to notice. There is recognition of the importance of space – in art and music and literature and life. Space to think: to ask and answer questions, to observe, reflect, understand, create and share. Time to think about the absence, or threatened absence of things, and what is truly important to us, to create a sense of personal responsibility with regard to protecting and cherishing our natural world and the creative opportunities that are open to young people. Eva John thelostwords.org Illustrations © Jackie Morris 2017 SINGING NATURE BACK TO LIFE thelostwords.org 2 © Elly Lucas Photography GENERAL ACTIVITIES • Watch and listen to the Spell Songs videos https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hg1xFYpXuWA&feature=youtu.be • Create your own Spell Songs book to record your own ideas in response to the art and music of The Lost Words and the environment around you.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Representation and Transmission in the Globalization of Guinea's Djembé
    THE POLITICS OF REPRESENTATION AND TRANSMISSION IN THE GLOBALIZATION OF GUINEA'S DJEMBÉ by Vera H. Flaig A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Music: Musicology) in the University of Michigan 2010 Doctoral Committee: Professor Emeritus Judith O. Becker, Co-Chair Assistant Professor Christi-Anne Castro, Co-Chair Associate Professor Vanessa Helen Agnew Associate Professor Charles Hiroshi Garrett Associate Professor Mbala D. Nkanga © Vera Helga Flaig All rights reserved 2010 Dedication To Deborah Anne Duffey the wind beneath my wings; Herdith Flaig who encouraged me to be strong and independent; Erhardt Flaig who always believed in me; and Rainer Dörrer who gave his life for the djembé. ii Acknowledgements Given the scope of the research that preceded the writing of this dissertation, there are many people to thank. Of all the individuals I met in Germany, Guinea, and across the United States I am sure to miss a few. There are not enough pages to be able to name all people who have: helped me find directions, connect with informants, provided me a place to stay, shared their food, and compared notes in a djembé workshop. To all who remain nameless, I thank you for making this project possible. I would like to thank the Rackham Graduate School and the School of Music, Theatre and Dance at the University of Michigan for generously funding my graduate work. I was honored to receive a Board of Regents Fellowship as well as several Teaching Assistantships which helped me to reach candidacy. I was also honored to receive the Glen McGeoch memorial Scholarship during my final semester as a Graduate Student Instructor.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Utility of Music: Utility of Social S
    cjp_30-1_42664 Sheet No. 5 Side A 11/12/2020 09:05:36 \\jciprod01\productn\C\CJP\30-1\CJP101.txt unknown Seq: 1 28-OCT-20 8:34 ARTICLES SOCIAL UTILITY OF MUSIC: A CASE FOR A COPYRIGHT EXEMPTION FOR THERAPEUTIC USES Amanda Reid* Music is more than mere entertainment; modern research shows that it can be an effective therapeutic tool. The social utility of music therapy is undertheorized and underexplored from a legal perspective. This is worrisome because copyright law directly impacts this clinical discipline. The well-known concerns about fair use uncertainty and rightsholder overreach are at play for music therapists. The high social utility of music therapy coupled with the high transaction costs to license various uses of music justify a carveout under copyright law. To ensure robust safeguards for this burgeoning field, a statutory exemption for therapeutic uses of music is warranted. INTRODUCTION ................................................. 1 R I. MUSIC’S THERAPEUTIC RANGE .......................... 4 R II. COPYRIGHT & MUSIC LICENSING ........................ 17 R III. PROPOSED EXEMPTION FOR THERAPEUTIC USES OF MUSIC .............................................. 37 R CONCLUSION................................................... 43 R cjp_30-1_42664 Sheet No. 5 Side A 11/12/2020 09:05:36 INTRODUCTION It’s hard to overstate the importance of music. From time immemo- rial, we have used music to soothe our newborns, celebrate our auspi- cious occasions, honor our heroes, practice our faith, enjoy our leisure, and mourn our losses.1 Music is used to punctuate the most important * J.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 1 ELAINE FEDER & BERNARD FEDER, THE EXPRESSIVE ARTS THERAPIES 1 (1981) (“The use of the expressive arts in therapy can be traced in time to the dim beginnings of human artistic expression; it can be tracked across the continents and found in virtually every human culture.”); Kate E.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing Style and Meaning in the Music of Abbey Lincoln, Nina Simone and Cassandra Wilson
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2012 Learning How to Listen': Analyzing Style and Meaning in the Music of Abbey Lincoln, Nina Simone and Cassandra Wilson LaShonda Katrice Barnett College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the African American Studies Commons, Music Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Barnett, LaShonda Katrice, "Learning How to Listen': Analyzing Style and Meaning in the Music of Abbey Lincoln, Nina Simone and Cassandra Wilson" (2012). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539623358. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-fqh4-zq06 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 'Learning How To Listen': Analyzing Style and Meaning in the Music of Abbey Lincoln, Nina Simone and Cassandra Wilson LaShonda Katrice Barnett Park Forest, Illinois, U.S.A. Master of Arts, Sarah Lawrence College, 1998 Bachelor of Arts, University of Missouri, 1995 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the College ofWilliam and Mary in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy American Studies Program The College ofWilliam and Mary August, 20 12 APPROVAL PAGE This Dissertation
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright Licensing in Music Distribution, Reproduction, and Public Performance
    Copyright Licensing in Music Distribution, Reproduction, and Public Performance Brian T. Yeh Legislative Attorney September 22, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL33631 Copyright Licensing in Music Distribution, Reproduction, and Public Performance Summary This report provides an overview of the complexities of the Copyright Act’s provisions concerning music licensing. It also discusses four issues involving copyrights in musical works and sound recordings that have been the subject of recent congressional and judicial consideration: (1) extending copyright protection to pre-1972 sound recordings; (2) requiring radio broadcasters to compensate recording artists; (3) changing the standard used to calculate royalties for digital music transmissions; and (4) modifying antitrust consent decrees governing songwriter performance royalties. Copyright law provides protection for original works of authorship by conferring certain exclusive rights upon their creators. Music is an example of a kind of literary and artistic work that falls squarely within the scope of copyright law. Federal law recognizes copyright protection for two separate and distinct types of music-related creations: “musical works” and “sound recordings.” A musical work refers to a songwriter’s musical composition and accompanying lyrics, while a sound recording is a particular version of a musician singing or playing a musical work, as that rendition is captured in a recording medium such as a compact disc, cassette tape, vinyl album, or MP3 file. If a third party wants to use a copyrighted work in a particular way, he or she must ordinarily seek permission from the copyright holder; in the music industry, such permission is often referred to as “licensing.” A license permits a third party to do something with a copyrighted work that implicates a copyright holder’s exclusive right, possibly in exchange for monetary compensation known as a royalty fee, without concern of infringing the copyright holder’s rights.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rhetorical Analysis of Music As a Mode of Resistance in the 21St Century
    THE REVOLUTION WILL BE SPOTIFIED: A RHETORICAL ANALYSIS OF MUSIC AS A MODE OF RESISTANCE IN THE 21ST CENTURY Triauna Carey A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2020 Committee: Daniel Bommarito, Committee Co-Chair Radhika Gajjala, Committee Co-Chair Julia Halo Graduate Faculty Representative Neil Baird © 2020 Triauna Carey All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Daniel Bommarito, Committee Co-Chair Radhika Gajjala, Committee Co-Chair This research project analyzes how musicians and genres of music are used as rhetorically effective modes of resistance in political and social climates in the West to break down barriers culturally and reveal systems of power. An interdisciplinary approach is implemented that combines cultural rhetorics, popular culture studies, communication studies, and ethnomusicology to investigate the way musicians send messages of resistance to different audiences and listeners. In order to do so, Huckin, Andrus, and Clary-Lemon’s concept of critical discourse analysis is used to analyze the way music lyrics convey meaning and cue the audience to certain resistant messages in different ways. In addition, Royster and Kirsch’s concept of social circulation is utilized to tap into the ways technology and online social spaces are interrogated as complex rhetorical spaces that are multidimensional and add new levels of activism for musicians. The study focuses on four mainstream genres, pop, rap and hip-hop, rock and alternative, and country, to reveal how artists in these genres use the rhetorical strategies available in the genre to reach their audience, while also navigating the power systems and structures at play.
    [Show full text]
  • UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Shima-uta : of windows, mirrors, and the adventures of a traveling song Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/65c271zr Author Alarcón-Jiménez, Ana-María Publication Date 2009 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO “SHIMA-UTA:” OF WINDOWS, MIRRORS, AND THE ADVENTURES OF A TRAVELING SONG A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in Music by Ana-Mar´ıa Alarcon-Jim´ enez´ Committee in charge: Nancy Guy, Chair Anthony Burr Anthony Davis 2009 Copyright Ana-Mar´ıa Alarcon-Jim´ enez,´ 2009 All rights reserved. The thesis of Ana-Mar´ıa Alarcon-Jim´ enez´ is ap- proved, and it is accepted in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically : Chair University of California, San Diego 2009 iii DEDICATION To my family and my extended family (my friends from everywhere). iv EPIGRAPH Collective identity is an ineluctable component of individual identity. However, collec- tive identity is also a need that is felt in the present, and that stems from the more funda- mental need to have a sense of one’s own existence. We are given this sense of existence through the eyes of others, and our collective belonging is derived from their gaze. I am not nothing nor nobody: I am French, a youth, a Christian, a farmer... (Todorov 2003, 150) v TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page............................................ iii Dedication.............................................. iv Epigraph...............................................v Table of Contents.......................................... vi List of Figures...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Performing Folk Punk : Agonistic Performances of Intersectionality Benjamin D
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2013 Performing folk punk : agonistic performances of intersectionality Benjamin D. Haas Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Haas, Benjamin D., "Performing folk punk : agonistic performances of intersectionality" (2013). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 798. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/798 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. PERFORMING FOLK PUNK: AGONISITIC PERFORMANCES OF INTERSECTIONALITY A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical ColleGe in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the deGree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Communication Studies by Benjamin D. Haas B.S., Drury University, 2007 M.A., Southern Illinois University, 2010 AuGust 2013 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I want to thank my advisor, Tracy Stephenson Shaffer, for all her labor in GettinG me throuGh this process, her never endinG encouraGement, her patience with an at times difficult advisee, and her participation in our epic conversations. Thanks to my committee members Patrica A. Suchy and Laura Mullen for their guidance in my coursework and this document. I want to thank my dean’s representative Seth OrGel for takinG the time to read my work and attend my eXamination. Thank you to my Baton RouGe cohort: Travis Brisini, Sarah Jackson-Shipman, Raquel Polanco, Ari Gratch, Lyndsay Michalik, Danielle McGeouGh, Brianne Waychoff, Mollye Deloach, Micah Caswell, Emily Graves, Jade Huell, Holley VauGhn, Rebecca Walker, Mike Rold, Wade Walker, Brian Leslie, Derek Mudd, and Lisa FlanaGan.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Hip? David Garibaldi: His Musical Life, His Influences, and His Contributions
    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones 12-1-2015 What Is Hip? David Garibaldi: His Musical Life, His Influences, and His Contributions Jeremy Tait Meronuck University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the Music Commons Repository Citation Meronuck, Jeremy Tait, "What Is Hip? David Garibaldi: His Musical Life, His Influences, and His Contributions" (2015). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 2562. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/8220142 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WHAT IS HIP? DAVID GARIBALDI: HIS MUSICAL LIFE, HIS INFLUENCES, AND HIS CONTRIBUTIONS By Jeremy Tait Meronuck Bachelor of Music University of Cincinnati-College Conservatory of Music 1995 Master of Music University of Nevada, Las Vegas 2009 A doctoral
    [Show full text]