DOCSLIB.ORG

Jordan River Basin Planning for the Future

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

JORDAN RIVER BASIN PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE June 2010 By: Utah Division of Water Resources With input from the State Water Plan Coordinating Committee (see inside-back cover for participating agencies) U T A H S T A T E W A T E R P L A N This document and other State water plans are available online at: www.water.utah.gov Table of Contents DRAFT - Date ii DRAFT - Date Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Board of Water Resources acknowledges the following staff members of the Utah Division of Water Resources for their dedication and valuable contribution to this document: Dennis Strong - Director Eric Millis - Deputy Director Todd Adams - Assistant Director Todd Stonely - Section Chief, River Basin Planning Ken Short - Senior Engineer, River Basin Planning (Project Manager/Primary Author) Russ Barrus - Senior Engineer Mike Suflita - Senior Engineer Eric Klotz - Section Chief, Water Conservation, Education and Use Dave Cole - Section Chief, Hydrology and Computer Applications Eric Edgley - Section Chief, Technical Services The Board also extends its gratitude to members of the Utah State Water Plan Coordinating Committee and the Jordan River Basin Planning Advisory Group, who helped review the document for accuracy, provided insight and data, or otherwise lent their support. Many of these people provided the Division with valuable written and oral comments, all of which have been carefully considered and incorporated where possible. Without all these contributions, this product would not be the comprehensive guide it is intended to be. Craig E. Johansen, Chair Robert D. Bessey, Vice Chair Paul McPherson N. Gawain Snow Blair R. Francis Harold Shirley David S. Humphreys Joseph “Stew” Paulick iii Table of Contents DRAFT - Date iv DRAFT - Date Table of Contents PREFACE One of the major responsibilities of the Utah Division of Water Resources is comprehensive water planning. Over the past two decades, the Division has prepared a series of documents under the title "Utah State Water Plan." This includes two statewide water plans and an individual water plan for each of the State’s eleven major hydrologic river basins. Preparing these plans involves several major data collection programs as well as extensive inter-agency and public outreach efforts. Much is learned through this process. State, local, and federal water planners and managers obtain valuable information for use in their programs and activities, and the public receives the opportunity to provide meaningful input in improving the state’s water resources stewardship. This document is the latest in the "Utah State Water Plan" series and is intended to guide and direct water- related planning and management in the Jordan River Basin over the next several years. It summarizes key data obtained through the previous water planning documents, introduces new data where available, and addresses issues of importance to all future water planning efforts. Where possible, it identifies water use trends and makes projections of water use. The document also explores various means of meeting future water demands and identifies important issues that need to be considered when making water-related decisions. Water managers and planners within the Basin will find the data, insights and direction provided by this document valuable in their efforts. The general public will discover many useful facts and information helpful in understanding the Basin’s water resources. Included in this Jordan River Basin Plan are real-life examples highlighted in the text, sidebars and photographs. Although the use of technical words is avoided wherever possible, an extensive glossary illuminates exact usage of terminology that may be unfamiliar to the reader. In addition to the printed form of this document, the Utah Division of Water Resources has made a “pdf” version available on the Internet. This can be accessed through the Division’s home page at: www.water.utah.gov. This web page allows this document and other water planning documents to be viewed by the largest audience possible, thus facilitating better planning and management at the state and local level. It also provides a convenient mode for readers to provide comment and feedback to the Division regarding its water planning efforts. v Table of Contents DRAFT - Date vi DRAFT - Date Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................................................... iii PREFACE............................................................................................................................................................v TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................. vii LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................................ix LIST OF TABLES...............................................................................................................................................x SIDEBARS .........................................................................................................................................................xi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. xiii Chapter Page 1 INTRODUCTION: WATERS OF THE JORDAN RIVER BASIN.............................................................1 Future Vision..........................................................................................................................................1 Purpose of this Plan ................................................................................................................................3 Description of Basin...............................................................................................................................3 Drainage Area and Topography .......................................................................................................3 Physiography and Geology..............................................................................................................3 Soils and Vegetation.........................................................................................................................4 Significance of Water Resources to the Basin........................................................................................4 Brief History of Water Planning and Development................................................................................5 The Pioneer Period (1847-1880) ......................................................................................................5 The Growth and Expansion of Salt Lake City (1881-1929).............................................................5 Federal Projects and Local Water Districts (1930-Present) .............................................................6 The Impacts of Settlement, Industry and Water Development on the Jordan River Ecosystem......7 State Water Planning: Fulfilling a Stewardship......................................................................................7 1997 Jordan River Basin Plan..........................................................................................................8 The 2001 Utah State Water Plan ......................................................................................................8 The Current Plan..............................................................................................................................8 2 WATER SUPPLY ................................................................................................................................11 Climatological Influences...............................................................................................................11 Available Water Supply .................................................................................................................13 Surface Water..........................................................................................................................14 Ground Water..........................................................................................................................16 Imported Water........................................................................................................................19 Total Available Supply ............................................................................................................20 Variability of Supply......................................................................................................................20 Drought ....................................................................................................................................22 Developed Supply ..........................................................................................................................23 Water Rights...................................................................................................................................26 3 POPULATION AND WATER USE TRENDS AND PROJECTIONS...............................................29 A Promising Era of Growth and Prosperity ...................................................................................29 Population Trends and Projections.................................................................................................29
Recommended publications
  • Reconnaissance of Toxic Substances in the Jordan River, Salt Lake County, Utah

    Reconnaissance of Toxic Substances in the Jordan River, Salt Lake County, Utah

    RECONNAISSANCE OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES IN THE JORDAN RIVER, SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH by KendalI R. Thompson U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 84-4155 Prepared In cooperation with the SALT LAKE COUNTY DIVISION OF FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY Salt Lake City, Utah 1984 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WILLIAM P. CLARK, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional nformation Copies of the report can write to: be purchased from: District Chief Open-File Services Section U.S. Geological Survey Western Distribution Branch 1016 Administration Building U.S. Geological Survey 1745 West 1700 South Box 25425, Federal Center Salt Lake City, Utah 84014 Lakewood, Colorado 80225 Telephone [(303) 234-5888] CONTENTS Page Abstract ................................................................ 1 Introduction ............................................................ 2 Hydrologic setting ................................................. 2 Previous studies ................................................... 4 Sampling sites ..................................................... 5 Methods ............................................................ 5 State stream-use classes and associated standards for toxic substances ................................................. 6 Toxic substances ........................................................ 6 General discussion of toxic substances that exceeded State standards in the Jordan River study area ................... 6 Distribution of toxic substances in
  • Salt Lake County Integrated Watershed Plan (2015)

    Salt Lake County Integrated Watershed Plan (2015)

    2015 Salt Lake County Integrated Watershed Plan Update to the 2009 Salt Lake Countywide Water Quality Stewardship Plan This page is intentionally blank. 2015 Salt Lake County Integrated Watershed Plan 2015 Salt Lake County Integrated Watershed Plan Update to the 2009 Salt Lake Countywide Water Quality Stewardship Plan Published September 2016 Prepared By: Salt Lake County Watershed Planning & Restoration 2001 South State Street, Suite N3-120 Salt Lake City, UT 84190 HDR Engineering, Inc. 2825 East Cottonwood Parkway, Suite 200 Salt Lake City, UT 84121 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Water quality and watershed issues are complex, multi-faceted, and at times contradictory. Establishing and maintaining effective stewardship requires cooperation between local municipal governments, stakeholder groups, and various management and regulatory agencies. It is only with continued cooperation that we will collectively improve water quality and watershed health in Salt Lake County. Our thanks go to the numerous individuals and organizations that supported and contributed to the development of this plan as critical thinkers, technical experts, and reviewers. In particular, we thank Mayor Ben McAdams and Salt Lake County Council for their continued support of environmental stewardship and integrated watershed planning. Salt Lake County Mayor Ben McAdams Administration, Flood Control Engineering, Township Services, Parks and Recreation, Salt Lake County Health Department Salt Lake County Council Jim Bradley, Arlyn Bradshaw, Max Burdick, Steve DeBry, Sam Granato, Michael
  • Rockport Utah a Brief History and Photographs of Homes

    Rockport Utah a Brief History and Photographs of Homes

    ROCKPORT UTAH A BRIEF HISTORY AND PHOTOGRAPHS OF HOMES Edited and Compiled by Thomas E. Brown FORWARD Several years ago I was asked to speak at sacrament meeting program in the Peoa Ward. The Peoa members of the Daughters of the Utah Pioneers had planned the program and I was asked to speak about the pioneers in the valley. Since no one specifically asked me to speak about Peoa, I focused my remarks on my hometown of Rockport. Days were spent researching the subject. Books and documents in my possession provided a base, but additional information was needed. Much time was spent at the Church Historical Department reviewing documents and soon enough information had been collected to fill the assignment. After the meeting, several friends asked for copies of the talk. The information was not typed and it needed to be put together better. All this time I had a set of wonderful photographs showing the homes in Rockport taken by Florence Siddoway Walsh Hunter years before. The photos had been shown to friends who said they would like copies. Because of the interest in both the talk and the photos, I decided to get the history typed and the photos enlarged and labeled so they could be put together in some printed form. There may be misspelled names, wrong dates, incorrect information, omissions and a host of other problems with this document. Some problems may have existed in the materials I used and some may be of my own making. This is not a complete history in any sense of the word, but I hope you find some enjoyment and satisfaction in reviewing the history and the photos just as I have.
  • Jordan River Utah Temple History

    Jordan River Utah Temple History

    Local History | The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Historical Background of the Jordan River Utah Temple In the middle of the Salt Lake Valley, there unbelievable, and this temple is an answer is a river that runs from south to north. After to prayer and a dream come true.” Mormon pioneers entered the valley in 1847, The Jordan River Temple became the 20th they named the river the Jordan River. The operating temple in the Church, the sev- land near this river in the southern part of enth built in Utah, and the second temple the valley passed through several pioneer in the Salt Lake Valley. It was the fourth- families throughout three decades. In 1880, largest temple in the Church following the a 19-year-old English immigrant named Salt Lake, Los Angeles and Washington William Holt bought 15 acres of land from D.C. Temples. More than 34 years after the his uncle Jesse Vincent for $2.00 an acre. It original dedication, the Jordan River Utah remained in the Holt family and was passed Temple was closed in February of 2016 for to Holt’s son, Alma, in 1948. extensive renovation. In the autumn of 1977, Alma Holt and his At the time of the Jordan River Temple’s ear- family felt inspired to donate the 15-acre ly construction in June 1979, the population parcel of land in South Jordan to the Church. of South Jordan had grown to approximately On February 3, 1978, President Spencer W. 7,492, and the temple served approximate- Kimball announced plans to construct a ly 267,000 people in 72 stakes (a stake is temple on that prominent site overlooking similar to a diocese) in South Jordan and its the valley below.
  • Characterization of Hydrogeological Properties in Salt Lake Valley, Utah, Using Insar

    Characterization of Hydrogeological Properties in Salt Lake Valley, Utah, Using Insar

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface RESEARCH ARTICLE Characterization of Hydrogeological Properties 10.1029/2017JF004497 in Salt Lake Valley, Utah, using InSAR Key Points: Xie Hu1 , Zhong Lu1 , and Teng Wang2 • Time series ground deformation over Salt Lake Valley (Utah) has been 1Huffington Department of Earth Sciences, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, USA, 2Earth Observatory of Singapore, obtained from satellite InSAR data • Long-term and seasonal deformation Nanyang Technological University, Singapore observations, and hydrological records help characterize hydrogeological properties Abstract Charactering subsurface aquifer systems is important not only to managing their long-term • Deformation maps and decay viability as a stable water source but also to protecting the residences and infrastructures. In particular, coefficients suggest that surface understanding how aquifer skeletons deform in response to hydraulic head changes requires fl faults disturb groundwater ow and fi fi partition hydrological units hydrogeological parameters such as decay coef cient, storage coef cient, and bulk compressibility. Quantifying these key aquifer properties often requires the analysis of limited water gauge and drilling data. Here we investigate the spatiotemporal correlation between the vertical ground deformation derived by Supporting Information: • Supporting Information S1 ENVISAT Advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar (ASAR) and Sentinel-1A data sets and available hydrological records in order to improve the aquifer characterization under Salt Lake Valley, Utah. Interferometric Correspondence to: synthetic aperture radar results show a clear long-term and seasonal correlation between surface X. Hu, uplift/subsidence and groundwater recharge/discharge, with evidence for the net uplift of 15 mm/year of an [email protected] area southwest of Salt Lake City for six years.
  • Jordan River Total Maximum Daily Load Water Quality Study - Phase 1

    Jordan River Total Maximum Daily Load Water Quality Study - Phase 1

    Jordan River Total Maximum Daily Load Water Quality Study - Phase 1 Prepared for: Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Quality 195 North 1950 West Salt Lake City, Utah 84116 Carl Adams- Project Supervisor Hilary Arens- Project Manager Prepared by: Cirrus Ecological Solutions, LC 965 South 100 West, Suite 200 Logan, Utah 84321 Stantec Consulting Inc. 3995 South 700 East, Suite 300 Salt Lake City, Utah 84107 EPA APPROVAL DATE JUNE 5, 2013 i Jordan River TMDL Jordan River – 1 (UT16020204-001) Waterbody ID Jordan River – 2 (UT16020204-002) Jordan River – 3 (UT16020204-003) Parameter of Concern Dissolved Oxygen Pollutant of Concern Total Organic Matter Class 3B Protected for warm water species of game fish and aquatic life, including the necessary Impaired Beneficial Use aquatic organisms in their food chain. Loading Assessment Current Load 2,225,523 kg/yr Total Organic Matter Loading Capacity 1,373,630 kg/yr or 3,763 kg/day Total Organic Matter (38% reduction) Load capacity based on OM concentrations that result in DO model endpoint of 5.5 mg/L, Margin of Safety including 1.0 mg/L implicit MOS added to the instantaneous DO water quality standard of 4.5 mg/L. Bulk Load Allocation 684,586 kg/yr Total Organic Matter (35% reduction) Bulk Waste Load 689,044 kg/yr Total Organic Matter (41% reduction) Allocation Defined Total OM load to lower Jordan River (kg/yr) <= 1,373,630 kg/yr Targets/Endpoints Dissolved Oxygen => 4.5 mg/L Nonpoint Pollutant Utah Lake, Tributaries, Diffuse Runoff, Irrigation Return Flow, Groundwater Sources
  • Meet the Jordan River: an Ecological Walk Along the Riparian Zone

    Meet the Jordan River: an Ecological Walk Along the Riparian Zone

    Meet the Jordan River: An Ecological Walk Along the Riparian Zone A riparian zone, like the one you're walking along today, is the interface between land and a river or stream. Plant habitats and communities along the river margins and banks are called riparian vegetation, and are characterized by hydrophilic (“water loving”) plants. Riparian zones are significant in ecology, environmental management, and civil engineering because of their role in soil conservation, habitat biodiversity, and the influence they have on fauna and aquatic ecosystems, including grassland, woodland, and wetlands. 1. “Education Tree” 2. Sandbar or Coyote Willow Old male Box Elder Salix exigua Acer negundo Z Sandbar Willow is an important Box Elders are one of the most plants in the riparian zone. It valuable trees native trees for grows in thickets up to 8 feet tall riparian wildlife habitat. on both sides of the river. They stabilize streambanks, provide cover and cooling, and Look for graceful arching their brittle branches create hollows for bird nests. branches and delicate yellow Caterpillars, aphids and Box Elder bugs feed on the tree and catkins in spring. are food source many bird species Beavers use branches for food and construction. Yellow warblers hunt for insects under the protection of the willow Box Elder wood was used for bowls, pipe stems, and drums. thicket. Box Elders are the only members of the maple family with Fremont Indians used willow for home construction, fishing compound leaves. weirs, and basket making. Easily propagated by plunging cut stems into the mud near the water. 3. Hemp Dogbane and Common 4.
  • Nutrient Dynamics in the Jordan River and Great

    Nutrient Dynamics in the Jordan River and Great

    NUTRIENT DYNAMICS IN THE JORDAN RIVER AND GREAT SALT LAKE WETLANDS by Shaikha Binte Abedin A thesis submitted to the faculty of The University of Utah in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering The University of Utah August 2016 Copyright © Shaikha Binte Abedin 2016 All Rights Reserved The University of Utah Graduate School STATEMENT OF THESIS APPROVAL The thesis of Shaikha Binte Abedin has been approved by the following supervisory committee members: Ramesh K. Goel , Chair 03/08/2016 Date Approved Michael E. Barber , Member 03/08/2016 Date Approved Steven J. Burian , Member 03/08/2016 Date Approved and by Michael E. Barber , Chair/Dean of the Department/College/School of Civil and Environmental Engineering and by David B. Kieda, Dean of The Graduate School. ABSTRACT In an era of growing urbanization, anthropological changes like hydraulic modification and industrial pollutant discharge have caused a variety of ailments to urban rivers, which include organic matter and nutrient enrichment, loss of biodiversity, and chronically low dissolved oxygen concentrations. Utah’s Jordan River is no exception, with nitrogen contamination, persistently low oxygen concentration and high organic matter being among the major current issues. The purpose of this research was to look into the nitrogen and oxygen dynamics at selected sites along the Jordan River and wetlands associated with Great Salt Lake (GSL). To demonstrate these dynamics, sediment oxygen demand (SOD) and nutrient flux experiments were conducted twice through the summer, 2015. The SOD ranged from 2.4 to 2.9 g-DO m-2 day-1 in Jordan River sediments, whereas at wetland sites, the SOD was as high as 11.8 g-DO m-2 day-1.
  • Park City, Utah 8.37 Acre Commercial Development Parcel Entitled for Five Multi-Use Buildings Totalling 209,990 Sf Gross 122,432 Sf Leasable/ Salable

    Park City, Utah 8.37 Acre Commercial Development Parcel Entitled for Five Multi-Use Buildings Totalling 209,990 Sf Gross 122,432 Sf Leasable/ Salable

    PARK CITY, UTAH 8.37 ACRE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT PARCEL ENTITLED FOR FIVE MULTI-USE BUILDINGS TOTALLING 209,990 SF GROSS 122,432 SF LEASABLE/ SALABLE Offered by: RONALD J. SHARP & ASSOCIATES Robert Holmes Associate Broker [email protected] • 435.640.6367 Kahrin Holmes [email protected] • 435.640.5370 Sales Price $8,100,000 LAND 8.37 Acre Development Parcel $22.22 / SF Gross Land Area $48.09 / SF Developable Land Area IMPROVEMENTS Recently approved entitlements for residential and commercial development of 5 buildings totaling 209,991 square feet gross/122,432 square feet leasable. $38.57/SF Gross Building Area $66.16/SF Net Leasable Area WATER 38.38 Shares (ERC’s) of Mountain Regional Water available for $403,489.00 ($10,513.00/ERC) I-80 (APPROXIMATELY 1 MILE) HWY 40 TO I-80 BLDG. D PARK CITY STORAGE BLDG. B HWY 40 UNDERGROUND PARKING DRIVE-THRU BLDG. A SILVER CREEK BUSINESS PARK UNDERGROUND PARKING BLDG. E BLDG. C FRONTAGE RD. SEATTLE SALT LAKE NEW YORK CITY CITY 80 PARK CITY • Forbes Magazine released its CHICAGO annual BEST STATES FOR BUSINESS AND CAREERS ranking Utah #1 for the 3rd SAN HEBER consecutive year. Rankings FRANCISCO CITY are based on six primary categories: business costs, PROVO PHOENIX economic climate, growth SAN prospects, labor, quality of life DIEGO ATLANTA and regulatory environment. DALLAS • Utah was named the TOP STATE FOR ECONOMIC 70 OUTLOOK for the 5th ORLANDO consecutive year by ALEC- Laffer State Economic Index; FLIGHT TIMES “Rich States, Poor States.” for SALT LAKE CITY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT: Business Facilities Magazine ATLANTA ...............................3:40 HRS ORLANDO ............................4:20 HRS SAN DIEGO ..........................1:54 HRS 15 • ranked Utah #1 overall for its CHICAGO ..............................3:01 HRS PHOENIX ..............................1:31 HRS SAN FRANCISCO ..............1:42 HRS DALLAS ..................................2:30 HRS NEW YORK ..........................4:27 HRS SEATTLE ...............................1:54 HRS PRO-BUSINESS CLIMATE.
  • Native Unionoida Surveys, Distribution, and Metapopulation Dynamics in the Jordan River-Utah Lake Drainage, UT

    Native Unionoida Surveys, Distribution, and Metapopulation Dynamics in the Jordan River-Utah Lake Drainage, UT

    Version 1.5 Native Unionoida Surveys, Distribution, and Metapopulation Dynamics in the Jordan River-Utah Lake Drainage, UT Report To: Wasatch Front Water Quality Council Salt Lake City, UT By: David C. Richards, Ph.D. OreoHelix Consulting Vineyard, UT 84058 email: [email protected] phone: 406.580.7816 May 26, 2017 Native Unionoida Surveys and Metapopulation Dynamics Jordan River-Utah Lake Drainage 1 One of the few remaining live adult Anodonta found lying on the surface of what was mostly comprised of thousands of invasive Asian clams, Corbicula, in Currant Creek, a former tributary to Utah Lake, August 2016. Summary North America supports the richest diversity of freshwater mollusks on the planet. Although the western USA is relatively mollusk depauperate, the one exception is the historically rich molluskan fauna of the Bonneville Basin area, including waters that enter terminal Great Salt Lake and in particular those waters in the Jordan River-Utah Lake drainage. These mollusk taxa serve vital ecosystem functions and are truly a Utah natural heritage. Unfortunately, freshwater mollusks are also the most imperiled animal groups in the world, including those found in UT. The distribution, status, and ecologies of Utah’s freshwater mussels are poorly known, despite this unique and irreplaceable natural heritage and their protection under the Clean Water Act. Very few mussel specific surveys have been conducted in UT which requires specialized training, survey methods, and identification. We conducted the most extensive and intensive survey of native mussels in the Jordan River-Utah Lake drainage to date from 2014 to 2016 using a combination of reconnaissance and qualitative mussel survey methods.
  • Echo Dam, Weber River Project Summit County, Utah, Safety of Dams Modification, Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact PRO-EA-05-003

    Echo Dam, Weber River Project Summit County, Utah, Safety of Dams Modification, Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact PRO-EA-05-003

    Echo Dam, Weber River Project Summit County, Utah, Safety of Dams Modification, Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact PRO-EA-05-003 Weber River Project, Summit County, Utah Upper Colorado Region Provo Area Office U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Provo Area Office Provo, Utah September 2009 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Echo Dam, Weber River Project Summit County, Utah, Safety of Dams Modification, Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact PRO-EA-05-003 Weber River Project, Summit County, Utah Upper Colorado Region Provo Area Office Contact Person W. Russ Findlay Provo Area Office 302 East 1860 South Provo, Utah 84606 801-379-1084 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Provo Area Office Provo, Utah September 2009 Contents Page Chapter 1 – Need for Proposed Action and Background.................................. 1 1.1 Introduction........................................................................................... 1 1.2 Dam Safety Program Overview............................................................ 1 1.2.1 Safety of Dams NEPA Compliance Requirements..................... 2 1.3 Purpose of and Need for the Proposed Action...................................... 2 1.4 Description of Echo Dam and Reservior .............................................. 2 1.4.1 Echo Dam.................................................................................... 3 1.4.2 Echo Reservoir............................................................................ 5 1.4.3 Normal Operations.....................................................................
  • Ground Water in Utah's Densely Populated Wasatch Front Area the Challenge and the Choices

    Ground Water in Utah's Densely Populated Wasatch Front Area the Challenge and the Choices

    Ground Water in Utah's Densely Populated Wasatch Front Area the Challenge and the Choices United States Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2232 Ground Water in Utah's Densely Populated Wasatch Front Area the Challenge and the Choices By DON PRICE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 2232 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL MODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1985 For sale by the Branch of Distribution U.S. Geological Survey 604 South Pickett Street Alexandria, VA 22304 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Price, Don, 1929- Ground water in Utah's densely populated Wasatch Front area. (U.S. Geological Survey water-supply paper ; 2232) viii, 71 p. Bibliography: p. 70-71 Supt. of Docs. No.: I 19.13:2232 1. Water, Underground Utah. 2. Water, Underground Wasatch Range (Utah and Idaho) I. Title. II. Series. GB1025.U8P74 1985 553.7'9'097922 83-600281 PREFACE TIME WAS Time was when just the Red Man roamed this lonely land, Hunted its snowcapped mountains, its sun-baked desert sand; Time was when the White Man entered upon the scene, Tilled the fertile soil, turned the valleys green. Yes, he settled this lonely region, with the precious water he found In the sparkling mountain streams and hidden in the ground; He built his homes and cities; and temples toward the sun; But without the precious water, his work might not be done. .**- ste'iA CONTENTS Page Preface ..................................................... Ill Abstract ................................................... 1 Significance Ground water in perspective ................................ 1 The Wasatch Front area Utah's urban corridor ....................................