DOCSLIB.ORG

Jordan River Total Maximum Daily Load Water Quality Study - Phase 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jordan River Total Maximum Daily Load Water Quality Study - Phase 1 Jordan River Total Maximum Daily Load Water Quality Study - Phase 1 Prepared for: Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Quality 195 North 1950 West Salt Lake City, Utah 84116 Carl Adams- Project Supervisor Hilary Arens- Project Manager Prepared by: Cirrus Ecological Solutions, LC 965 South 100 West, Suite 200 Logan, Utah 84321 Stantec Consulting Inc. 3995 South 700 East, Suite 300 Salt Lake City, Utah 84107 EPA APPROVAL DATE JUNE 5, 2013 i Jordan River TMDL Jordan River – 1 (UT16020204-001) Waterbody ID Jordan River – 2 (UT16020204-002) Jordan River – 3 (UT16020204-003) Parameter of Concern Dissolved Oxygen Pollutant of Concern Total Organic Matter Class 3B Protected for warm water species of game fish and aquatic life, including the necessary Impaired Beneficial Use aquatic organisms in their food chain. Loading Assessment Current Load 2,225,523 kg/yr Total Organic Matter Loading Capacity 1,373,630 kg/yr or 3,763 kg/day Total Organic Matter (38% reduction) Load capacity based on OM concentrations that result in DO model endpoint of 5.5 mg/L, Margin of Safety including 1.0 mg/L implicit MOS added to the instantaneous DO water quality standard of 4.5 mg/L. Bulk Load Allocation 684,586 kg/yr Total Organic Matter (35% reduction) Bulk Waste Load 689,044 kg/yr Total Organic Matter (41% reduction) Allocation Defined Total OM load to lower Jordan River (kg/yr) <= 1,373,630 kg/yr Targets/Endpoints Dissolved Oxygen => 4.5 mg/L Nonpoint Pollutant Utah Lake, Tributaries, Diffuse Runoff, Irrigation Return Flow, Groundwater Sources Wastewater Stormwater Jordan Basin WRF (UT0025852) Phase I Permit South Valley WRF (UT0024384) Salt Lake County Central Valley WRF (UT0024392) Salt Lake City South Davis WTP (UT0021628) UDOT Regulated Point Source Phase II Permit Pollutants Bluffdale Midvale South Salt Lake Draper Murray Taylorsville Herriman Riverton West Jordan Holladay Sandy West Valley Lehi South Jordan Phased TMDL Phase II (2012–2018): Characterization of OM and WQ Response; BMP Implementation Phase III (2018–2023): BAT Design; Implementation of Stormwater Capital Improvements; Begin TMDL Strategy implementation strategy in revised TMDL. Phase IV (2023-2028): Construction upgrades for point sources to meet WLAs, meet all DO water quality standards. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ iii List of Appendices ....................................................................................................................... v List of Tables .............................................................................................................................. vi List of Figures ............................................................................................................................. vi Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... S-1 1.0 Introduction and State of the Jordan River ................................................................................ 1 1.1 The TMDL Process ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1.1 Federal Requirements of Clean Water Act ..................................................................... 1 1.1.2 TMDL Guidelines ........................................................................................................... 2 1.1.3 Utah Water Quality Standards and Jordan River Beneficial Uses .................................. 2 1.1.4 Status of current impairments and phased approach ....................................................... 3 1.2 Watershed Description ........................................................................................................... 6 1.2.1 Topography ..................................................................................................................... 6 1.2.2 Geology/Soils .................................................................................................................. 9 1.2.3 Precipitation .................................................................................................................... 9 1.2.4 Hydrology ....................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Stakeholders and the TMDL process ................................................................................... 10 1.3.1 Federal, State, and Municipal Authority ....................................................................... 10 1.3.2 Municipal Water Demand ............................................................................................. 12 1.3.3 Flood Control ................................................................................................................ 14 1.4 Water Quality ....................................................................................................................... 14 1.4.1 Data Collection ............................................................................................................. 14 1.4.2 Existing Water Quality Conditions ............................................................................... 16 1.5 Summary and Discussion ..................................................................................................... 18 2.0 Water Quality Linkage in the lower Jordan River ................................................................... 23 2.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 23 2.2 Evidence of DO Impairment in the lower Jordan River ...................................................... 23 2.2.1 Water Quality Stations on the lower Jordan River ........................................................ 23 2.2.2 Seasonal Patterns in DO Measurements and Violations ............................................... 24 2.2.3 DO Deficits ................................................................................................................... 25 2.3 Processes Affecting DO in Streams and Rivers ................................................................... 26 2.4 Critical Condition ................................................................................................................. 28 2.4.1 Definition ...................................................................................................................... 28 2.4.2 Application to the Lower Jordan River ......................................................................... 29 2.4.2.1 Process Used to Identify Critical Condition for DO .............................................. 29 2.4.2.2 Findings Relating to Critical Condition ................................................................. 29 2.4.2.3 Critical Condition for DO in the Lower Jordan River ........................................... 32 2.5 Modeling water quality responses to pollutant loading in lower Jordan River – Application of the QUAL2Kw Water Quality Model .......................................................... 32 iii 2.5.1 Model Description......................................................................................................... 32 2.5.2 Calibration ..................................................................................................................... 33 2.6 DO Endpoint for the Lower Jordan River ............................................................................ 34 2.6.1 Definition and Use of Endpoints in the TMDL ............................................................ 34 2.6.2 Margins of Safety in Establishing an Endpoint ............................................................. 34 2.7 Pollutant of concern and permissible loads (water quality responses to pollutants from QUAL2KW Model) ............................................................................................................. 37 2.7.1 Effect of Reducing Nutrients on DO in the lower Jordan River ................................... 37 2.7.2 Effect of Reducing Organic Matter on DO in the lower Jordan River.......................... 38 2.7.3 Nature of OM in the Jordan River................................................................................. 39 2.8 Summary .............................................................................................................................. 41 3.0 Pollutant Source Analysis ........................................................................................................ 43 3.1. Jordan River Organic Matter............................................................................................... 43 3.2 Jordan River OM Pollutant Source Characteristics ............................................................. 44 3.2.1 Wastewater treatment plants ......................................................................................... 44 3.2.2 Stormwater .................................................................................................................... 46 3.2.3 Utah Lake ...................................................................................................................... 47 3.2.4 Tributaries ..................................................................................................................... 48 3.2.5 Diffuse Runoff .............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reconnaissance of Toxic Substances in the Jordan River, Salt Lake County, Utah
    RECONNAISSANCE OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES IN THE JORDAN RIVER, SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH by KendalI R. Thompson U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 84-4155 Prepared In cooperation with the SALT LAKE COUNTY DIVISION OF FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY Salt Lake City, Utah 1984 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WILLIAM P. CLARK, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional nformation Copies of the report can write to: be purchased from: District Chief Open-File Services Section U.S. Geological Survey Western Distribution Branch 1016 Administration Building U.S. Geological Survey 1745 West 1700 South Box 25425, Federal Center Salt Lake City, Utah 84014 Lakewood, Colorado 80225 Telephone [(303) 234-5888] CONTENTS Page Abstract ................................................................ 1 Introduction ............................................................ 2 Hydrologic setting ................................................. 2 Previous studies ................................................... 4 Sampling sites ..................................................... 5 Methods ............................................................ 5 State stream-use classes and associated standards for toxic substances ................................................. 6 Toxic substances ........................................................ 6 General discussion of toxic substances that exceeded State standards in the Jordan River study area ................... 6 Distribution of toxic substances in
    [Show full text]
  • Salt Lake County Integrated Watershed Plan (2015)
    2015 Salt Lake County Integrated Watershed Plan Update to the 2009 Salt Lake Countywide Water Quality Stewardship Plan This page is intentionally blank. 2015 Salt Lake County Integrated Watershed Plan 2015 Salt Lake County Integrated Watershed Plan Update to the 2009 Salt Lake Countywide Water Quality Stewardship Plan Published September 2016 Prepared By: Salt Lake County Watershed Planning & Restoration 2001 South State Street, Suite N3-120 Salt Lake City, UT 84190 HDR Engineering, Inc. 2825 East Cottonwood Parkway, Suite 200 Salt Lake City, UT 84121 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Water quality and watershed issues are complex, multi-faceted, and at times contradictory. Establishing and maintaining effective stewardship requires cooperation between local municipal governments, stakeholder groups, and various management and regulatory agencies. It is only with continued cooperation that we will collectively improve water quality and watershed health in Salt Lake County. Our thanks go to the numerous individuals and organizations that supported and contributed to the development of this plan as critical thinkers, technical experts, and reviewers. In particular, we thank Mayor Ben McAdams and Salt Lake County Council for their continued support of environmental stewardship and integrated watershed planning. Salt Lake County Mayor Ben McAdams Administration, Flood Control Engineering, Township Services, Parks and Recreation, Salt Lake County Health Department Salt Lake County Council Jim Bradley, Arlyn Bradshaw, Max Burdick, Steve DeBry, Sam Granato, Michael
    [Show full text]
  • Jordan River Utah Temple History
    Local History | The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Historical Background of the Jordan River Utah Temple In the middle of the Salt Lake Valley, there unbelievable, and this temple is an answer is a river that runs from south to north. After to prayer and a dream come true.” Mormon pioneers entered the valley in 1847, The Jordan River Temple became the 20th they named the river the Jordan River. The operating temple in the Church, the sev- land near this river in the southern part of enth built in Utah, and the second temple the valley passed through several pioneer in the Salt Lake Valley. It was the fourth- families throughout three decades. In 1880, largest temple in the Church following the a 19-year-old English immigrant named Salt Lake, Los Angeles and Washington William Holt bought 15 acres of land from D.C. Temples. More than 34 years after the his uncle Jesse Vincent for $2.00 an acre. It original dedication, the Jordan River Utah remained in the Holt family and was passed Temple was closed in February of 2016 for to Holt’s son, Alma, in 1948. extensive renovation. In the autumn of 1977, Alma Holt and his At the time of the Jordan River Temple’s ear- family felt inspired to donate the 15-acre ly construction in June 1979, the population parcel of land in South Jordan to the Church. of South Jordan had grown to approximately On February 3, 1978, President Spencer W. 7,492, and the temple served approximate- Kimball announced plans to construct a ly 267,000 people in 72 stakes (a stake is temple on that prominent site overlooking similar to a diocese) in South Jordan and its the valley below.
    [Show full text]
  • Meet the Jordan River: an Ecological Walk Along the Riparian Zone
    Meet the Jordan River: An Ecological Walk Along the Riparian Zone A riparian zone, like the one you're walking along today, is the interface between land and a river or stream. Plant habitats and communities along the river margins and banks are called riparian vegetation, and are characterized by hydrophilic (“water loving”) plants. Riparian zones are significant in ecology, environmental management, and civil engineering because of their role in soil conservation, habitat biodiversity, and the influence they have on fauna and aquatic ecosystems, including grassland, woodland, and wetlands. 1. “Education Tree” 2. Sandbar or Coyote Willow Old male Box Elder Salix exigua Acer negundo Z Sandbar Willow is an important Box Elders are one of the most plants in the riparian zone. It valuable trees native trees for grows in thickets up to 8 feet tall riparian wildlife habitat. on both sides of the river. They stabilize streambanks, provide cover and cooling, and Look for graceful arching their brittle branches create hollows for bird nests. branches and delicate yellow Caterpillars, aphids and Box Elder bugs feed on the tree and catkins in spring. are food source many bird species Beavers use branches for food and construction. Yellow warblers hunt for insects under the protection of the willow Box Elder wood was used for bowls, pipe stems, and drums. thicket. Box Elders are the only members of the maple family with Fremont Indians used willow for home construction, fishing compound leaves. weirs, and basket making. Easily propagated by plunging cut stems into the mud near the water. 3. Hemp Dogbane and Common 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Nutrient Dynamics in the Jordan River and Great
    NUTRIENT DYNAMICS IN THE JORDAN RIVER AND GREAT SALT LAKE WETLANDS by Shaikha Binte Abedin A thesis submitted to the faculty of The University of Utah in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering The University of Utah August 2016 Copyright © Shaikha Binte Abedin 2016 All Rights Reserved The University of Utah Graduate School STATEMENT OF THESIS APPROVAL The thesis of Shaikha Binte Abedin has been approved by the following supervisory committee members: Ramesh K. Goel , Chair 03/08/2016 Date Approved Michael E. Barber , Member 03/08/2016 Date Approved Steven J. Burian , Member 03/08/2016 Date Approved and by Michael E. Barber , Chair/Dean of the Department/College/School of Civil and Environmental Engineering and by David B. Kieda, Dean of The Graduate School. ABSTRACT In an era of growing urbanization, anthropological changes like hydraulic modification and industrial pollutant discharge have caused a variety of ailments to urban rivers, which include organic matter and nutrient enrichment, loss of biodiversity, and chronically low dissolved oxygen concentrations. Utah’s Jordan River is no exception, with nitrogen contamination, persistently low oxygen concentration and high organic matter being among the major current issues. The purpose of this research was to look into the nitrogen and oxygen dynamics at selected sites along the Jordan River and wetlands associated with Great Salt Lake (GSL). To demonstrate these dynamics, sediment oxygen demand (SOD) and nutrient flux experiments were conducted twice through the summer, 2015. The SOD ranged from 2.4 to 2.9 g-DO m-2 day-1 in Jordan River sediments, whereas at wetland sites, the SOD was as high as 11.8 g-DO m-2 day-1.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Unionoida Surveys, Distribution, and Metapopulation Dynamics in the Jordan River-Utah Lake Drainage, UT
    Version 1.5 Native Unionoida Surveys, Distribution, and Metapopulation Dynamics in the Jordan River-Utah Lake Drainage, UT Report To: Wasatch Front Water Quality Council Salt Lake City, UT By: David C. Richards, Ph.D. OreoHelix Consulting Vineyard, UT 84058 email: [email protected] phone: 406.580.7816 May 26, 2017 Native Unionoida Surveys and Metapopulation Dynamics Jordan River-Utah Lake Drainage 1 One of the few remaining live adult Anodonta found lying on the surface of what was mostly comprised of thousands of invasive Asian clams, Corbicula, in Currant Creek, a former tributary to Utah Lake, August 2016. Summary North America supports the richest diversity of freshwater mollusks on the planet. Although the western USA is relatively mollusk depauperate, the one exception is the historically rich molluskan fauna of the Bonneville Basin area, including waters that enter terminal Great Salt Lake and in particular those waters in the Jordan River-Utah Lake drainage. These mollusk taxa serve vital ecosystem functions and are truly a Utah natural heritage. Unfortunately, freshwater mollusks are also the most imperiled animal groups in the world, including those found in UT. The distribution, status, and ecologies of Utah’s freshwater mussels are poorly known, despite this unique and irreplaceable natural heritage and their protection under the Clean Water Act. Very few mussel specific surveys have been conducted in UT which requires specialized training, survey methods, and identification. We conducted the most extensive and intensive survey of native mussels in the Jordan River-Utah Lake drainage to date from 2014 to 2016 using a combination of reconnaissance and qualitative mussel survey methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Water in Utah's Densely Populated Wasatch Front Area the Challenge and the Choices
    Ground Water in Utah's Densely Populated Wasatch Front Area the Challenge and the Choices United States Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2232 Ground Water in Utah's Densely Populated Wasatch Front Area the Challenge and the Choices By DON PRICE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 2232 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL MODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1985 For sale by the Branch of Distribution U.S. Geological Survey 604 South Pickett Street Alexandria, VA 22304 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Price, Don, 1929- Ground water in Utah's densely populated Wasatch Front area. (U.S. Geological Survey water-supply paper ; 2232) viii, 71 p. Bibliography: p. 70-71 Supt. of Docs. No.: I 19.13:2232 1. Water, Underground Utah. 2. Water, Underground Wasatch Range (Utah and Idaho) I. Title. II. Series. GB1025.U8P74 1985 553.7'9'097922 83-600281 PREFACE TIME WAS Time was when just the Red Man roamed this lonely land, Hunted its snowcapped mountains, its sun-baked desert sand; Time was when the White Man entered upon the scene, Tilled the fertile soil, turned the valleys green. Yes, he settled this lonely region, with the precious water he found In the sparkling mountain streams and hidden in the ground; He built his homes and cities; and temples toward the sun; But without the precious water, his work might not be done. .**- ste'iA CONTENTS Page Preface ..................................................... Ill Abstract ................................................... 1 Significance Ground water in perspective ................................ 1 The Wasatch Front area Utah's urban corridor ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Lake Comprehensive Management Plan Introduction Document on Sovereign Land Management
    Utah Lake Comprehensive Management Plan Introduction Document on Sovereign Land Management Introduction The bed of Utah Lake became state (sovereign) land on the date of Utah’s statehood, January 4,1896. The Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands manages the sovereign land in accordance with the Public Trust Doctrine, state law and administrative rule. The purpose of this document is to summarize the management framework for the bed of Utah Lake. The Origin of Sovereign Lands Under English common law, the Crown held title to all lands underlying navigable waterways, subject to the Public Trust Doctrine. Following the American Revolution, title to such lands in the U.S. vested in the 13 original colonies. Under the Equal Footing Doctrine, fee title to those lands also vested in each state subsequently admitted to the Union, upon admission. Utah’s public trust lands, known as “sovereign lands,” lie below the ordinary high water mark of navigable bodies of water. Utah’s sovereign land includes Utah Lake, Great Salt Lake, Bear Lake (Utah’s half), Jordan River and portions of the Green, Colorado and Bear rivers. Constitution, Statute and Rule The framework for sovereign land management is found in the Utah Constitution (Article XX), state statute (primarily Chapter 65A-10), and administrative rule (R652). Article XX of the Utah Constitution accepts sovereign lands to be held in trust for the people and managed for the purposes for which the lands were acquired. Section 65A-2-1 of the Utah Code provides: “The division [of Forestry, Fire and State Lands, FFSL] shall administer state lands under comprehensive land management programs using multiple-use, sustained-yield principles.” Briefly stated, the overarching management objectives of FFSL are to protect and sustain the trust resources of, and to provide for reasonable beneficial uses of those resources, consistent with their long-term protection and conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Item 3.2 Resolution 20-44 CARES Act Funding.Pdf
    MILLCREEK, UTAH RESOLUTION NO. 20-44 A RESOLUTION OF THE MILLCREEK COUNCIL APPROVING THE USE OF CARES ACT FUNDS FOR PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS WHEREAS, the Millcreek Council (“Council”) met in regular session on September 28, 2020 to consider, among other things, approving the use of CARES Act funds for public open space and trails; and WHEREAS, the United States Treasury Department’s Guidance on the Coronavirus Relief Fund dated September 2, 2020 states that it is a qualified expenditure to use CARES funds to help with “Expenses of actions to facilitate compliance with COVID-19 related public health measures;” and for communities to “enable compliance with COVID-19 public health precautions;” and WHEREAS, COVID-19 public health precautions issued by the United States Center for Disease Control includes admonishments to “visit parks, trails, and open spaces as a way to relieve stress, get some fresh air, and stay active,” specifically “visit parks and recreation areas that are close to your home,” since “parks and trails allow for social distancing of at least 6 feet between individuals or household groups;” and WHEREAS, the Council has received a formal request from the Jordan River Commission to expand the Jordan River Parkway through Millcreek and Environmental Planning Group (EPG) to provide public open space in Millcreek’s city center as necessary actions due to the COVID-19 related public health measures copies of which are attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the United States Treasury Department’s Guidance on the Coronavirus Relief
    [Show full text]
  • Organic Matter Is a Mixture of Terrestrial, Autochthonous, and Wastewater Effluent in an Urban River
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU Ecology Center Publications Ecology Center 1-10-2020 Organic Matter is a Mixture of Terrestrial, Autochthonous, and Wastewater Effluent in an Urban River Julia E. Kelso Utah State University Michelle A. Baker Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/eco_pubs Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Julia E. Kelso and Michelle A. Baker, Organic matter is a mixture of terrestrial, autochthonous, and wastewater effluent in an urban river, Frontiers in Environmental Science 7 (2020), 202. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fenvs.2019.00202 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Ecology Center at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ecology Center Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 10 January 2020 doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2019.00202 Organic Matter Is a Mixture of Terrestrial, Autochthonous, and Wastewater Effluent in an Urban River Julia E. Kelso 1,2* and Michelle A. Baker 2 1 Oak Ridge Institute of Science and Education, Washington, DC, United States, 2 Department of Biology and the Ecology Center, Utah State University, Logan, UT, United States Terrestrially derived organic matter (OM) is known to dominate the OM pool in reference watersheds. Urban watersheds are known to receive large OM loads compared to reference watersheds, but the proportion of terrestrial, autochthonous, and anthropogenic (e.g., wastewater effluent) sources of OM in urban watersheds remains unknown. Organic matter was identified as a pollutant of concern in the Jordan River, an urban river in the Salt Lake Basin, U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Cottonwood Canyons Scenic Byways Corridor Management Plan Cottonwood Canyons Corridor Management Plan 2008
    Little Cottonwood Canyon Big Cottonwood Canyon Scenic Byway Scenic Byway Cottonwood Canyons Scenic Byways Corridor Management Plan Cottonwood Canyons Corridor Management Plan 2008 Project Team: Carol Majeske, US Forest Service Claire Runge, Town of Alta Barbara Cameron, Big Cottonwood Canyon Community Council Laura McIndoe Briefer, Salt Lake City Public Utilities Ritchie Taylor, Utah Department of Transportation Peter Jager, Utah Department of Transportation Prepared for: Cottonwood Canyons Scenic Byways Committee Prepared by: Fehr & Peers 2180 South 1300 East Salt Lake City, Utah 84106 p 801.463.7600 MGB+A 145 West 200 South Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 p 801.364.9696 HW Lochner 310 East 4500 South Salt Lake City, Utah 84107 p 801.262.8700 ADOPTED DECEMBER 2008 Page 2 Cottonwood Canyons Corridor Management Plan Contents 1 Introduction 5 2 Travel Conditions along the Byways 9 3 Intrinsic Qualities 19 4 Byway Issues 27 5 Vision 31 6 Goals and Strategies 33 7 Byway Specific Plans 37 8 Implementation 65 Cottonwood Canyons Interpretive Plan Page 3 Cottonwood Canyons Corridor Management Plan Page 3 x Page 4 Cottonwood Canyons Corridor Management Plan Chapter 1 : Introduction A Corridor Management Plan is a written plan developed by the communities and stakeholders in a byway area that outlines how to define and enhance the byway’s intrinsic qualities and character. Utah is a state of contrast, where red rock gorges meet snow capped peaks. Among the most scenic and visited locations in the state, the Wasatch Mountains in northern Utah are a collection of special places that draw residents and visitors in quantity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Development of Wasatch Trails in Salt Lake County
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 1975 The Historical Development of Wasatch Trails in Salt Lake County Clyde Brian Hardy Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons, and the Mormon Studies Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Hardy, Clyde Brian, "The Historical Development of Wasatch Trails in Salt Lake County" (1975). Theses and Dissertations. 4759. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/4759 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. 41 JOE THE historical development OF WASATCH TRAILS IN sadtSALTsalt LAKE COUNTY A thesis presented to the department of recreation education brigham young university in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree master of arts by clyde brian hardy august 1975 this thesis by clyde brian hardy isis accepted in its present form by the department of recreation education of brigham younsyoung uni- versity as satisfysatisfyinging1 hettheehe thesis requirement for the degreedeg ree of master of arts ON Y 4 cayciy Yeenjajjinj a J nrf fdehoyoscommitF dehoyos committeetee oatcu r n catC 1 00 CX 571771 gayjytay tiariattaITA y atreermerftr C atnmiiyileeceeee Mbembmembeabermbere r r 1 4 T 17 william J hafiiafewiafeew department chiirmanchchoirmanChi
    [Show full text]