Kremlinologist As Hero

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kremlinologist As Hero vision of judicial authority, one founded disagreed with them, unless the president grant alcoves. As the Nazis overran on a decent regard for the competing con- and Congress had violated constitutional France, began bombing Britain, and then stitutional views of tbe political branches. rights and limitations tbat were too clear drove deep into the Soviet Union, the This might be a vision of judicial humility to ignore. It is not surprising, perhaps, gaiety of fraternity life and the "America for an age of dissensus, anchored not in that the Court has managed to avoid a First" detachment of 1939-1941 was al- romantic respect for the wisdom of Con- political backlash against its bigb-hand- most too much to bear for a Polish student gress and the president but in respect for edness by keeping its finger to the political from occupied Europe. Finally Pearl Har- their constitutional prerogative to inter- winds. But have the political branches bor broke tbe isolationist spell. Ulam ob- pret the Constitution in ways that may become so cowed by the Court's grandiose tained immigration papers and reported differ from the Supreme Court. A defer- assertions of its own supremacy tbat they to the United States draft board, only to be ential Court would generally uphold tbe bave lost the will to stand up for them- rejected for having "relatives living in acts of tbe political branches, even when it selves? • enemy territory"! In 1943, upon graduat- ing, the taJl, strapping youth was sum- moned for a physical, but he was turned away again, this time for near-sighted- ness. Unlike other eager call-ups, he bad forgotten to wear contacts. Following bis elder brother (and surro- Kremlinologist as Hero gate father) to the University of Wiscon- sin, Adam got a job as an army instructor KOTKIN for Russian, the unfamiliar language of our wartime ally. Tbe other teachers in- Understanding the Cold War: cluded an ex-czarist general, a former baroness, and a Moscow-trained Polish A Historian s Personal Reflections violinist with whom Adam shared an byAdamB. Ulam apartment. The roommates befriended a retired professor of Bj-zantine history, (Leopolis, 448 pp., $30 paper) Alexander Vasiliev, who had known Tchai- kovsky in St. Petersburg, and in Madison RY TO IMAGINE the intellec- mately cast out Trotsky as prophet, and helped them to order spaghetti and meat- tual life of the post-war West talked up Khrushchev, until he was ban- balls in Italian. In such company, Adam without the Polish emigration. ished. Ajid there bave been many others, acquired a fondness for Russian culture The Polish impact has been notably Adam Ulam, who died in March rather than the more typical Russophobia especially immense when it in Cambridge, Massachusetts, leaving be- of the emigre Pole born of centuries under Tcomes to views on Russia. Czeslaw Milosz hind a half century of influential scholar- the Russian boot. The anny privates and lectured at Berkeley with uncanny empa- ship and punditry, and a posthumous non-coms whom Ulam had taught to thy on Dostoevst^. Leszek Kolakowski, memoir. Understanding the Cold War. speak Russian were assigned to tbe Pacific the renowned moral philosopher at Ox- Adam Bruno Ulam was born in 1922 in Theater. ford and Chicago, entombed Soviet Marx- Lw(')w in Poland, a medieval town that was Stanislaw Ulam had disappeared (to ism as well as Westem Marxism in bis known as Lemberg under the Habsburgs New Mexico, it turned out, to work on monumental trilogy, and composed an and would become Lvov under the Sovi- the bomb), and after tbe long anticipated immortal parody of revisionist scholar- ets. Since 1991, the "City of Lions" bas victory Poland disappeared, too, behind ship on Stalinism (for the pages of 5w rvey, been Lviv in independent Ukraine. Little the Iron Curtain. Adam, meanwhile, bad edited by Leo Labedz). Andrzej Walicki of remains tbere of tbe classical education or enrolled in Harvard's Govemment De- Notre Dame stmck brilliant portraits of Old World culture tbat nurtured the partment for graduate study. Two of his Russian populism and the Slavophile- future Cold War historian. In 1939, Adam, teachers at Brown had studied at Harvard, Westernizer divide, and then delivered his who had just graduated high school, and and Ulam writes that they imparted "an own eulogy for the Marxist faitb. his twenty-nine-year-old brother Stanis- historical approach to modem politics And beyond tbe history of ideas, law, a young mathematician at Harvard's enlarged by philosophical analysis and Zbigniew Brzezinski, the grand strate- Society of Fellows, bome for summer holi- political and economic considerations"—a gist and perceptive analyst of the Soviet day, were scheduled to board ship for New description of what would become bis Bloc, served as National Security Adviser York on September 3. Their perspicacious own winning method, now quantifiably (under Carter), while Richard Pipes, the father, a well-to-do lawyer wbo was wid- out of fashion. He wrote a dissertation on grand synthesizer of imperial Russian his- owed the year before, advised his boys English socialism, and also studied with tory, also found his way into the National to set sail earlier. So the)' embarked for Merle Fainsod, the dean of Soviet ana- Security Council (under Reagan). Tbe New York in mid-August. Hitler invaded lysts, wbose twelve o'clock lectures in a University of Pennsylvania's Moshe Lewin Poland on September 1. Sixteen days later, basement classroom in the Fogg Museum became the acclaimed village elder among Stalin, by prior secret agreement with were aflectionately known as "Darkness historians of Soviet Russia's peasant in- Hitler, invaded Poland from tbe east. By at Noon." heritance, monstrous bureaucracy, and then, Stan had returned to Harvard, and At Ulam's first Harvard residence, the supposed dynamics of tbe system's Adam enrolled at Brown, tbe only enter- Claverly Hall, tbe janitor sported a derby evolution. The itinerant Isaac Deutschcr, ing foreign student, and a Jew. The broth- hat and pince-nez, and reminisced about based eventually in England, achieved ers never saw their father or elder sister fonner student residents, such as Franklin biographical mastery over Stalin, ulti- again. D. Roosevelt. Later Ulam swapped places Brown, where young Ulam studied with a young scholar named McGeorge STEPHEN KOTKIN directs tbe Russian European and American history, was not Bundy and moved to Eliot House. The Studies program at Princeton University. City College with its politicized, immi- housemaster at his new abode, John THE NEW REPUBLIC : NOVEMBER 6, 2000 : 45 I H Finley, a professor of Greek, brought the nineteen books, one a novel. As he here itously arrived, heat the underground university's most renowned faculty to the recounts, he initially devoted himself to party into seizing power at all costs. What m mess hall and social gatherings, and knew examining Marxism's powers of seduc- Ulam called Lenin's "penchant for terror" hy name his entire student "flock," not just tion, which he linked not to intelligentsia he attributed to a "perverse hatred" that m the European counts and princes. Ulam manipulations but to psychological pro- the dropout law student felt toward "his boarded with the son of James Joyce, the clivities arising out of social developments, own class," the intelligentsia, and to the m grandson of Matisse, the younger son of especially in peasant societies undergoing hanging of his elder brother hy the czarist the Aga Khan, and a descendant of Indo- industrialization. And whereas some cele- police. Such occasionally strained psy- c nesian rajas who told him his family had brated analysts, such as John Maynard chologizing went together with skillfiil CO been in politics for 800 years. "And what Keynes, had dismissed Marxism as "illogi- recuperations of seemingly obscure ideo- did they do before?" Ulam recalls having cal and dull," Ulam highlighted the doc- logical disputations, alleged to have long- o asked. trine's intricacy and comprehensiveness, term repercussions, and sober details of In these mandarin alcoves of the new, which, he argued, explained its attraction political repression. American-dominated postwar world, not just to peasants but also to intellectu- The upshot, a powerful portrait of the Ulam, in J. Press suits and striped bow als. Ulam also wrote about the Soviet- Bolshevik leader and the Bolshevik move- ties, came to know officials of Chiang Kai- Yugoslav split in 1948, which just three ment written despite the inaccessibility of Shek's Nationalist regime, who had no many documents, burst on the scene after clue that they were soon to be overthrown, the de-Stalinization in 1956, the launch- as well as trainees for what would be- ing of Sputnik in 1957, and the Cuban come Mao's regime. Ulam also met Pierre revolution in I960, all of which had Trudeau, whom he recalls as an aristo- contributed to a sense that the Soviet cratic French-Canadian with "Christ- Union had not simply recovered from ian-anarchist" views, as well as the World War II but recaptured its revo- doctoral student in economics lutionary elan, and might just be Andreas Papandreou. Whatever the wave of the future. Here Ulain he did for Greece as prime minis- notes that the opening of the ter after the downfall of the secret archives has brought little colonels' dictatorship, Papan- that was truly unknovin about dreou is said to have been valu- Lenin, unless one counts the able company for obtaining proof of his consummation special treatment in Greek- with Inessa Armand. The dic- American restaurants, and tator's "all-engrossing passion for navigating Boston night- for revolution," he writes, had clubs. Ulam lets slip that in "seemed to preclude the pos- 1945, after the relaxation of sibility, perhaps the ability, to gender segregation on cam- respond to the temptation of pus, a romance blossomed in the flesh." Widener Library viith an Stalin had succeeded Lenin, unnamed Anglo-Irish repre- and in 1973 Ulam published sentative of the fair sex, leading his acclaimed biography, Stalin: to dog shows, horse races, and The Man and His Era.
Recommended publications
  • 1 Joseph Stalin: Power and Ideas
    Cambridge University Press 0521616530 - Stalin: A New History Edited by Sarah Davies and James Harris Excerpt More information 1 Joseph Stalin: power and ideas Sarah Davies and James Harris Stalin, like the other ‘evil dictators’ of the twentieth century, remains the subject of enduring public fascination.1 Academic attention, however, has shifted away from the study of ‘Great Men’, including Stalin, towards the little men and women, such as the now celebrated Stepan Podlubnyi, and towards Stalinist political culture more generally.2 Ironically this is at a time when we have unprecedented access to hitherto classified material on Stalin, the individual.3 The object of this volume is to reinvigorate scholarly interest in Stalin, his ideas, and the nature of his power. Although Stalin certainly did not single-handedly determine everything about the set of policies, practices, and ideas we have come to call Stalinism, it is now indisputable that in many respects his influence was decisive. A clearer understanding of his significance will allow more precise analysis of the origins and nature of Stalinism itself. 1 Note the interest in several recent publications aimed primarily at a popular readership: Martin Amis, Koba the Dread: Laughter and the Twenty Million (London: Jonathan Cape, 2002); Simon Sebag Montefiore, Stalin: The Court of the Red Tsar (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 2003); Donald Rayfield, Stalin and his Hangmen (London: Viking, 2004). 2 Podlubnyi has been made famous by Jochen Hellbeck in a number of publications, including ‘Fashioning the Stalinist Soul: The Diary of Stepan Podlubnyi, 1931–1939’, Jahrbucher fu¨r Geschichte Osteuropas 44 (1996), 344–73.
    [Show full text]
  • Colloquium Paper January 12, 1984 STALINISM VERSUS
    Colloquium Paper January 12, 1984 STALINISM VERSUS BOLSHEVISM? A Reconsideration by Robert C. Tucker Princeton University with comment by Peter Reddaway London School of Economics and Political Science Fellows Kennan Institute for Advanced Russian Studies Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars Draft paper not for publication or quotation without written permission from the authors. STALINISM VERSUS BOLSHEVISM? A Reconsideration Although not of ten openly debated~ the issue I propose to address is probably the deepest and most divisive in Soviet studies. There is good ground for Stephen Cohen's characterization of it as a "quintessential his­ torical and interpretive question"! because it transcends most of the others and has to do with the whole of Russia's historical development since the Bolshevik Revolution. He formulates it as the question of the relationship "between Bolshevism and Stalinism.'' Since the very existence of something properly called Stalinism is at issue here, I prefer a somewhat different mode of formulation. There are two (and curiously, only two) basically opposed positions on the course of development that Soviet Russia took starting around 1929 when Stalin, having ousted his opponents on the Left and the Right, achieved primacy, although not yet autocratic primacy, within the Soviet regime. The first position, Which may be seen as the orthodox one, sees that course of development as the fulfillment, under new conditions, of Lenin's Bolshevism. All the main actions taken by the Soviet regime under Stalin's leadership were, in other words, the fulfillment of what had been prefigured in Leninism (as Lenin's Bolshevism came to be called after Lenin died).
    [Show full text]
  • Paving the Path for Success: Lenin's Political Theory in Practice, 1902-1917 Kelly Olsen
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2009 Paving the Path for Success: Lenin's Political Theory in Practice, 1902-1917 Kelly Olsen Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES PAVING THE PATH FOR SUCCESS: LENIN’S POLITICAL THEORY IN PRACTICE, 1902-1917 By KELLY OLSEN A Thesis submitted to the Interdisciplinary Program in Russian and East European Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2009 The members of the committee approve the thesis of Kelly Olsen defended on November 3, 2009. ________________________________________ Jonathan Grant Professor Directing Defense ________________________________________ Mark Souva Committee Member ________________________________________ Edward Wynot Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members. ii This Thesis is dedicated to Dr. Art Vanden Houten in an effort to thank him for igniting my passion for political theory and showing me that the influence of a truly great teacher expands much further than the classroom. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge Dr. Jonathan Grant for guiding me through the research and writing process and answering all my questions; big and small. I would also like to acknowledge my father, mother, and sister for encouraging me to always strive for success and for listening to me talk about Lenin for countless hours. Thank you. iv ABSTRACT This thesis presents and evaluates a selection of Lenin’s political writings from 1902-1917 in an effort to illustrate the continuity in his political theory.
    [Show full text]
  • FALL 2019 NEWSLETTER from the 2019-20 Department Chair, Evelyn Brooks Higginbotham
    FALL 2019 NEWSLETTER From the 2019-20 Department Chair, Evelyn Brooks Higginbotham The History Department is revving up for department, they contributed greatly to the 2019-2020 academic year. In looking their fields of study, to Harvard, and to the forward to the opening of the semester, we historical profession. In fall 2018, death express excitement about the return of the also took alum Stephen Walsh, who received many faculty members who were on leave his PhD in History in 2014. The faculty last year. We welcome you back! And we voted last spring to honor his memory. One call special attention to Tiya Miles and Derek of the department’s three annual History Penslar, who spent their first year as Prize Instructorships will be called the tenured faculty at Harvard (2018-2019) on Stephen A. Walsh History Prize leave and join us this fall in a full and active Instructorship for the next three years way. Tiya Miles offers courses on African (2019-2022). Americans and Native Americans. She is also attentive to gender as one of her The History Department’s faculty news is course titles reveals—“Native American filled with much to highlight. Kirsten Weld Evelyn Brooks Women: History and Myth.” Derek Penslar was promoted to the rank of full professor Higginbotham offers courses in modern Jewish History. He and Arunabh Ghosh was promoted to Department Chair will teach the Gen Ed course “Is War associate professor. David Howell, Inevitable.” Similarly, Liz Cohen returns to previously an affiliate in the department, Dimiter Angelov the History faculty after her sabbatical, now holds a joint appointment with History Outgoing Director of which followed seven years of stellar and East Asian Languages and Civilizations leadership as the Dean of Radcliffe.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018
    2018Annual Report Annual Report July 1, 2017–June 30, 2018 Council on Foreign Relations 58 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065 tel 212.434.9400 1777 F Street, NW, Washington, DC 20006 tel 202.509.8400 www.cfr.org [email protected] OFFICERS DIRECTORS David M. Rubenstein Term Expiring 2019 Term Expiring 2022 Chairman David G. Bradley Sylvia Mathews Burwell Blair Effron Blair Effron Ash Carter Vice Chairman Susan Hockfield James P. Gorman Jami Miscik Donna J. Hrinak Laurene Powell Jobs Vice Chairman James G. Stavridis David M. Rubenstein Richard N. Haass Vin Weber Margaret G. Warner President Daniel H. Yergin Fareed Zakaria Keith Olson Term Expiring 2020 Term Expiring 2023 Executive Vice President, John P. Abizaid Kenneth I. Chenault Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer Mary McInnis Boies Laurence D. Fink James M. Lindsay Timothy F. Geithner Stephen C. Freidheim Senior Vice President, Director of Studies, Stephen J. Hadley Margaret (Peggy) Hamburg and Maurice R. Greenberg Chair James Manyika Charles Phillips Jami Miscik Cecilia Elena Rouse Nancy D. Bodurtha Richard L. Plepler Frances Fragos Townsend Vice President, Meetings and Membership Term Expiring 2021 Irina A. Faskianos Vice President, National Program Tony Coles Richard N. Haass, ex officio and Outreach David M. Cote Steven A. Denning Suzanne E. Helm William H. McRaven Vice President, Philanthropy and Janet A. Napolitano Corporate Relations Eduardo J. Padrón Jan Mowder Hughes John Paulson Vice President, Human Resources and Administration Caroline Netchvolodoff OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS, Vice President, Education EMERITUS & HONORARY Shannon K. O’Neil Madeleine K. Albright Maurice R. Greenberg Vice President and Deputy Director of Studies Director Emerita Honorary Vice Chairman Lisa Shields Martin S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cold War and East-Central Europe, 1945–1989
    FORUM The Cold War and East-Central Europe, 1945–1989 ✣ Commentaries by Michael Kraus, Anna M. Cienciala, Margaret K. Gnoinska, Douglas Selvage, Molly Pucci, Erik Kulavig, Constantine Pleshakov, and A. Ross Johnson Reply by Mark Kramer and V´ıt Smetana Mark Kramer and V´ıt Smetana, eds. Imposing, Maintaining, and Tearing Open the Iron Curtain: The Cold War and East-Central Europe, 1945–1989. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2014. 563 pp. $133.00 hardcover, $54.99 softcover, $54.99 e-book. EDITOR’S NOTE: In late 2013 the publisher Lexington Books, a division of Rowman & Littlefield, put out the book Imposing, Maintaining, and Tearing Open the Iron Curtain: The Cold War and East-Central Europe, 1945–1989, edited by Mark Kramer and V´ıt Smetana. The book consists of twenty-four essays by leading scholars who survey the Cold War in East-Central Europe from beginning to end. East-Central Europe was where the Cold War began in the mid-1940s, and it was also where the Cold War ended in 1989–1990. Hence, even though research on the Cold War and its effects in other parts of the world—East Asia, South Asia, Latin America, Africa—has been extremely interesting and valuable, a better understanding of events in Europe is essential to understand why the Cold War began, why it lasted so long, and how it came to an end. A good deal of high-quality scholarship on the Cold War in East-Central Europe has existed for many years, and the literature on this topic has bur- geoned in the post-Cold War period.
    [Show full text]
  • RUSSIA: Its Place in the 21St Century and The
    RUSSIA: Its Place in the 21st Century and the Implications for the United States The findings of a trilogy of panel studies by recognized experts A Special Report of the U.S.-Russia Relations Study Group June l, 2001 Sponsored by Hudson Institute, Inc. http://wwww.hudson.org A Special Report of the U.S.-Russia Relations Study Group June l, 2001 Sponsored by Hudson Institute, Inc. http://wwww.hudson.org CONTENTS Introduction by Herbert London Study Group Briefing Agenda and Panel Participants Part One - Plenary Session Rapporteur’s Report by Peter Schweizer Part Two - Panel Reports I. Internal Issues Panel Findings, Conclusions or Recommendations Remarks by Panel Chairman, Congressman Curt Weldon Cornerstone Paper by David Satter II. Foreign Policy Panel Findings, Conclusions or Recommendations Remarks by Panel Chairman, Senator Fred Thompson Cornerstone Paper by Dr. Richard Pipes III. Security and Military Issues Panel Findings, Conclusions or Recommendations Remarks by Panel Chairman, Major General William Odom, USA, Ret. Cornerstone Paper by Dr. Keith Payne Part Three - Luncheon Address by The Honorable James Woolsey Further Suggested Reading on Russia and the United States For Additional Information on this Hudson Institute Project and Future Hudson Institute Events, See Contact Information on the Inside Back Cover. A Special Report of the U.S.-Russia Relations Study Group June l, 2001 Sponsored by Hudson Institute, Inc. http://wwww.hudson.org RUSSIA: ITS PLACE IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR THE UNITED STATES A Report of the Hudson Institute Study Group on U.S.-Russia Relations Introduction By Herbert London Ten years ago we watched with near disbelief as the last great predatory empire, the Soviet Union, began to unravel before our eyes - and with scarcely a shot fired.
    [Show full text]
  • 740-01 Jones
    Spring 2018: History 740 T 6:30-9:20 MHRA 3204 Selected Topics in European History: Readings in Soviet History Instructor: Jeff Jones [email protected] Office: 2139 MHRA Phone: 334-4068 Office Hours: T 1:00-2; W 2:00-3:30; Th. 9:30-10:30 and by appointment Course Description This course is a graduate-level reading seminar on the historiography of the Soviet period from the Revolutionary/Civil War period, through the 1920s, the Stalin period (1928- 1953), and the era of Khrushchev’s reforms (1956-1964) to the stagnation of the Brezhnev years (late 1970s/early 1980s), the Soviet-Afghan War (1979-1989), and the collapse of the USSR in late 1991. Specifically, the course is divided into three sections: Revolution/Civil War/Stalinism; The Great Fatherland War & After; and The Post-Stalin Period. The course mixes some classic titles from the field with recent scholarly research focusing on several different themes with a wide variety of methodologies, theories, and approaches to history. Student Learning Outcomes Upon successful completion of this course students will be able to: Identify and thoughtfully discuss some of the key issues of debate in Soviet history; Critically appraise varying historical arguments and formulate their own interpretations; Critically read and distinguish between different methodologies and “read between the lines” of differing points of view; Participate in a respectful and thoughtful manner in discussions of a variety of topics; Apply principles and generalizations learned in this class to other problems and situations. Course Activities Participation 20% 4 Book Reviews (2-3 pages; 12-point font; double-spaced) 10% each Historiographical/Research Essay (18-22 pages; 12-point font; double-spaced) 30% Oral Presentation 10% Participation In a small, discussion-based seminar of this nature class participation is crucial.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Kremlinology: Understanding Regime Personalisation in Russia
    The New Kremlinology: Understanding Regime Personalisation in Russia In the post-Cold War period, many previously democratising countries experienced authoritarian reversals whereby incumbent leaders took over and gravitated towards personalist rule. Scholars have predom- inantly focused on the authoritarian turn, as opposed to the type of authoritarian rule emerging from it. In a departure from accounts cen- tred on the failure of democratisation in Russia, this book’s argument begins from a basic assumption that the political regime of Vladimir Putin is a personalist regime in the making. How do regimes turn personalist? How do their rulers acquire and maintain personal control? Focusing on the politics within the Russian ruling coalition since 1999, The New Kremlinology explains the process of regime personalisation, that is, the acquisition of personal power by a political leader. The investigation is based on four components of regime personalisation: patronage networks, deinstitutionalisation, media personalisation, and establishing permanency in office. Drawing from comparative evidence and theories of personalist rule, the book explains how Putin’s patron- client network became dominant and how, subsequently, the Russian ruler elevated himself above his own ruling coalition. The lessons of the book extend beyond Russia and illuminate how other personalist regimes emerge and develop. Furthermore, the title of the book, The New Kremlinology, is chosen to emphasise not only the subject mat- ter, the what, but also the how — the battery of innovative methods employed to study the black box of non-democratic politics. Alexander Baturo is Associate Professor of Government at Dublin City University and Johan A. Elkink is Associate Professor in Social Science Research Methods at University College Dublin.
    [Show full text]
  • ALL-ROUND DEVELOPMENT of VLADIMIR LENIN's PERSONALITY Javed Akhter, Khair Muhammad and Naila Naz M.Phil Scholar, Department Of
    International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research Method Vol.3, No.1, pp.23-34, March 2016 ___Published by European Centre for Research Training and Development UK (www.eajournals.org) ALL-ROUND DEVELOPMENT OF VLADIMIR LENIN’S PERSONALITY Javed Akhter, Khair Muhammad and Naila Naz M.Phil Scholar, Department of English Literature and Linguistics, University of Balochistan Quetta Balochistan Pakistan ABSTRACT: The study investigates the personality of Vladimir Lenin, in the light of Stephen R. Covey’s suggested habits, expounded in his books, “The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People” and “The 8th Habit: From Effectiveness to greatness”, following the most eminent Russian physiologist and psychologist I. P. Pavlov’s theory of classical behaviourism. Stephen R. Covey’s thought provoking and trend breaking book: “The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People” suggests seven habits and paradigms to become highly effective personality. He introduced the eighth habit in his innovative and challenging book “The 8th Habit: From Effectiveness to Greatness.” Therefore, his suggested eight habits, and paradigms, which are based on I. P. Pavlov’s theory of classical behaviourism. This paper would use the popped up chunks of I. P. Pavlov’s behaviourist theory to analyse how the process of habit formation influenced the effective and great personalities of the world. Therefore, the present study will enable the readers to confront Pavlov’s classical behaviourist theory of habit formation through stimuli and responses. The readers are also expected to abandon the bad habits and adopt the good ones. These infrequent but subtle hints serve as a model of effective as well as great personality of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Marxism Since the Communist Manifesto
    University of Central Florida STARS PRISM: Political & Rights Issues & Social Movements 1-1-1961 Marxism since the Communist manifesto Alfred G. Meyers Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/prism University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Book is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in PRISM: Political & Rights Issues & Social Movements by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Meyers, Alfred G., "Marxism since the Communist manifesto" (1961). PRISM: Political & Rights Issues & Social Movements. 22. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/prism/22 MARXISM SINCE THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO Ihe A4mcrim Httorlcal As¶datim, haguae at a eontiriw the teaching of history in the schd d the UzkiW esW&hcd the Wet Center for T&m cif Risary to offa qmWtive dtmce in m1ving some of the ptddum which tala7 beset ,the classraom teacher. me of the p- bdng sponsored by the Service Cmter is the prepiwaticb d a series of pampS1;1tts, each containing a eon& summary d pubkatio~~.@ectbg rt9:etwt research and new inte][prctatirms in a particular fidd d history. Prompted by an awarmea of the fact that the avaage 9condsry ~dmo1teacher has neither the time nor the opportunity to keep up with monographic litera- these pamphlets are specifically dt- dgnd to make available to the cl-m instructor a summary of pertinent trends aqd devdopments in historical study. Our aim is, in short, to help the teachem Up ems selves by keeping up to date in thdr fields d hiterest.
    [Show full text]
  • The End of the Cold War and Why We Failed to Predict It
    www.ssoar.info 1989 and why we got it wrong Cox, Michael Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Arbeitspapier / working paper Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Cox, M. (2008). 1989 and why we got it wrong. (Working Paper Series of the Research Network 1989, 1). Berlin. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-16282 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.de Working Paper Series of the Research Network 1989 Working Paper 1/2008 ISSN 1867-2833 1989 and why we got it wrong Michael Cox IDEAS and the Department of International Relations, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom Abstract The Cold War generated more discussion and controversy than any other topic since 1945. Yet, the possibility that the Cold War might end was neither on the radar of scholars nor of politics and the military. This essay seeks to explain why ‘we’ got it wrong by focusing in the main on how ‘we’ in the West understood the Soviet system. Part one thus deals with the Cold War itself and its impact on what came to be known as western ‘Soviet Studies’. Part two then looks at the way in which the USSR was understood by an emerging group of new social scientists in the 1970s and 1980s.
    [Show full text]