DOCSLIB.ORG

Stream Health Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stream Health Report 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to acknowledge the following for their support of this project: The Dauphin County Commissioners Jeffrey Haste, Chairman Mike Pries George Hartwick, III The Dauphin County Conservation District Board of Directors Timothy Wentzel, Chairman Edward O’Gorman, Vice Chairman Becky Witmer, Secretary Lisa Lauver, Treasurer Ronald Kopp David Coble James Szymborski Paul Anderson Commissioner Jeffrey Haste Past and present DCCD staff that contributed to this project Megan Blackmon, Watershed Specialist Robert Frank, Watershed Specialist Julia Kersetter, Watershed Intern Andy McAllister, Watershed Specialist Eric Naguski, District Manager Courtney Papinchak, Resource Coordinator Michael Pothoff, Watershed Specialist Lindsay Scarola, Special Projects Technician Jeremy Trexel, Watershed Specialist Alyssa Umberger, Watershed Intern Michael Yanchuk, Watershed Specialist Financial and other support for this project is provided by the Pennsylvania Association of Conservation Districts, Inc. through a grant from the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection under Section 319 of the Clean Water Act, administered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2 Table of Contents Dauphin County Streams: A Health Report 1.0 PURPOSE: ................................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 SOURCES OF DEGRADATION: ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 CHANGES IN STREAM HYDROLOGY ....................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 POLLUTANTS ENTERING STREAMS ........................................................................................................................ 5 3.0 WATER QUALITY STANDARDS OVERVIEW: ................................................................................................................ 6 4.0 MACROINVERTEBRATE ASSESSMENTS: ..................................................................................................................... 8 5.0 MONITORING METHODS: ........................................................................................................................................ 10 5.1 BIOLOGICAL ......................................................................................................................................................... 10 5.2 PYSICAL HABITAT ........................................................................................................................................................ 11 6.0 STUDY AREA OVERVIEW: ......................................................................................................................................... 12 7.1 MAHANTANGO CREEK .................................................................................................................................................... 13 7.2 WICONISCO CREEK .......................................................................................................................................................... 17 7.3 ARMSTRONG CREEK ........................................................................................................................................................ 21 7.4 POWELL CREEK ................................................................................................................................................................ 25 7.5 CLARK CREEK ................................................................................................................................................................... 29 7.6 STONY CREEK .................................................................................................................................................................. 32 7.7 FISHING CREEK ................................................................................................................................................................ 36 7.8 PAXTON CREEK ................................................................................................................................................................ 39 7.9 SPRING CREEK WEST ....................................................................................................................................................... 42 7.10 SWATARA CREEK ........................................................................................................................................................... 45 7.11 CONEWAGO CREEK ....................................................................................................................................................... 52 7.12 SUSQUEHANNA TRIBUTARIES ....................................................................................................................................... 55 8.0 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................................................ 57 8.1 CONTEXT OF TEST RESULTS ........................................................................................................................................ 57 8.2 OVERALL WATERSHED HEALTH .................................................................................................................................. 57 9.0 STREAM IMPROVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................................... 61 9.1 GENERAL ..................................................................................................................................................................... 61 9.2 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................................................................. 61 1. MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS .................................................................................................................................... 61 2. HOMEOWNERS ......................................................................................................................................................... 63 3. FARM OWNERS ......................................................................................................................................................... 64 4. DEVELOPERS ............................................................................................................................................................. 65 APPENDIX .............................................................................................................................................................................. 67 Appendix I: Sub-sampling and Identification Techniques ................................................................................................ 67 Appendix II: Metrics Analyses ........................................................................................................................................... 67 Statistical Significance Testing...................................................................................................................................... 68 Appendix III: DCCD Stream Health Classification .............................................................................................................. 69 Appendix IV: Aquatic Life Use Attainment ....................................................................................................................... 69 Appendix V: References .................................................................................................................................................... 70 Appendix VI: Watershed Sample Site Metrics Tables ....................................................................................................... 71 Appendix VII. Watershed Health Score Sample Cycle Comparison .................................................................................. 82 Appendix VIII: Countywide Stream Assessment Sample Sites ......................................................................................... 89 Appendix IX: Countywide Stream Health Classifications by Sample Site ......................................................................... 90 3 1.0 PURPOSE: The purpose of the Countywide Stream Assessment Program (CSAP) of the Dauphin County Conservation District (DCCD) is to collect data to determine the present condition of Dauphin County’s streams. The CSAP will document and measure changes in stream conditions occurring over time. In addition, CSAP will provide an evaluation of the factors affecting stream condition in order to protect, maintain, and restore streams to meet designated uses. The results of this 5 year study will be used to present water quality issues to the public to promote and support initiatives that increase direct participation in stream stewardship and the reduction of water pollution. The study will also focus DCCD programs and prioritize the most critical stream protection needs in the County’s watersheds. To improve public education, this document contains information regarding the character of the County’s watersheds and issues found within them. Data has been collected for the CSAP every year since 2004. This report focuses on data collected from 2014 to 2018. Upon completion, the results were reviewed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5
    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 3 NATURAL RESOURCES Percent, Respectively
    Dauphin County Comprehensive Plan: Basic Studies & Trends CHAPTER 3 NATURAL RESOURCES percent, respectively. The mean annual sunshine To assist in providing orderly, intelligent, Average Annual Temperature 50° F per year for the County is about 2,500 hours. and efficient growth for Dauphin County, it is Mean Freeze-free Period 175 days Summer Mean Temperature 76° F Although the climate will not have a major essential that features of the natural environment Winter Mean Temperature 32° F effect on land uses, it should be considered in the be delineated, and that this information be layout of buildings for purposes of energy integrated with all other planning tools and Winds are important hydrologic factors consumption. Tree lines and high ground should be procedures. because of their evaporative effects and their on the northwest side of buildings to take association with major storm systems. The advantage of the microclimates of a tract of land. To that end, this chapter provides a prevailing wind directions in the area are from the By breaking the velocity of the northwest winds, compilation of available environmental data as an northwest in winter and from the west in spring. energy conservation can be realized by reducing the aid to planning in the County. The average wind speed is 10 mph, with an temperature slightly. To take advantage of the sun extreme wind speed of 68 mph from the west- for passive or active solar systems, buildings should CLIMATE northwest reported in the Lower Susquehanna area have south facing walls. during severe storm activity in March of 1955.
    [Show full text]
  • RESTORATION PLAN Conewago Creek
    Conewago Creek Dauphin, Lancaster and Lebanon Counties Pennsylvania May 2006 Tri-County Conewago Creek Association P.O. Box 107 Elizabethtown, PA 17022 [email protected] UTH www.conewagocreek.netU RESTORATION PLAN Prepared by: RETTEW Associates, Inc. 3020 Columbia Ave. Lancaster, PA 17603 3 ____________________________________________________ ConewagoU Creek Restoration Plan May 2006 ____________________________________________________ This plan was developed for use by the Tri-County Conewago Creek Association. “A nonprofit volunteer organization committed to monitoring, preserving, enhancing and promoting the Conewago Creek Watershed through education, community involvement and watershed improvement projects.” This plan was developed with technical and financial support of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection and the United States Environmental Protection Agency through the section 319 program under the federal Clean Water Act. This plan was prepared by RETTEW Associates, Inc. 4 TABLEU OF CONTENTS PageU I. Introduction ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 II. Background ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 III. Data Collection ---------------------------------------------------------------- 10 IV. Modeling ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13 V. Results ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14 VI. Restoration Recommendations ----------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • NOTICES Such Addendum Shall Be Published in the Pennsylvania DEPARTMENT of Bulletin and Enforcement of the Addendum to the Order of Quarantine, Published at 44 Pa.B
    5955 NOTICES Such Addendum shall be published in the Pennsylvania DEPARTMENT OF Bulletin and enforcement of the Addendum to the Order of Quarantine, published at 44 Pa.B. 6947 issued Satur- AGRICULTURE day, November 1, 2014, with regard to that place or area shall become effective immediately. Addendum to the Order of Quarantine; Spotted Lanternfly Order Under authority of section 21 of the act (3 P.S. Recitals § 258.21), and with the Recitals previously listed incor- porated into and made a part hereof this Addendum to A. Spotted lanternfly, Lycorma delicatula, is a new pest the Order of Quarantine published at 44 Pa.B. 6947 to the United States and has been detected in the issued Saturday, November 1, 2014 by reference, the Commonwealth. This is a dangerous insect to forests, Department orders the following: ornamental trees, orchards and grapes and not widely prevalent or distributed within or throughout the Com- 1. Establishment of Quarantine. monwealth or the United States. Spotted lanternfly has A quarantine is hereby established with respect to been detected in the Commonwealth and has the poten- Albany, Greenwich, Ontalaunee, and Perry Townships, tial to spread to uninfested areas by natural means or Berks County; New Britain, and Plumstead Townships through the movement of infested articles. and Chalfont and New Britain Boroughs, Bucks County; West Vincent Township and Phoenixville Borough, Ches- B. The Plant Pest Act (Act) (3 P.S. §§ 258.1—258.27) ter County; Catasauqua and North Whitehall Townships, empowers The Department of Agriculture (Department) Lehigh County; Hatfield, Towamencin, Lower Salford, and to take various measures to detect, contain and eradicate Lower Providence Townships, Lansdale and Hatfield Bor- plant pests.
    [Show full text]
  • 3702 Curtin Road November 15, 2011
    APPLICATION TO THE USDA-ARS LONG TERM AGRO-ECOSYSTEM RESEARCH (LTAR) NETWORK FOR THE PASTURE SYSTEMS AND WATERSHED MANAGEMENT RESEARCH UNIT’S UPPER CHESAPEAKE BAY / SUSQUEHANNA RIVER COMPONENT PASTURE SYSTEMS AND WATERSHED MANAGEMENT RESEARCH UNIT 3702 CURTIN ROAD UNIVERSITY PARK, PA 16802 SUBMITTED BY JOHN SCHMIDT, RESEARCH LEADER POC: PETER KLEINMAN [email protected] NOVEMBER 15, 2011 Introduction We propose to establish an Upper Chesapeake Bay/ Susquehanna River component of the nascent Long Term Agro-ecosystem Research (LTAR) network, with leadership of that component by USDA-ARS Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit (PSWMRU). To fully represent the Upper Chesapeake Bay/ Susquehanna River region, four watershed locations are identified where intensive research would be focused in each of the major physiographic provinces contained within the region. Due to varied physiographic and biotic zones within the region, multiple watershed sites are required to represent the diversity of agricultural conditions. The PSWMRU has a long history of high-impact research on watershed and grazing land management, and has an established nexus of regional and national collaborative networks that would rapidly expand the linkages desired under LTAR (GRACEnet, the Conservation Effects Assessment Project, the Northeast Pasture Consortium and SERA-17). Research from the PSWMRU underpins state and national agricultural management guidelines (Phosphorus Index, Pasture Conditioning Score Sheet, NRCS practice standards). However, it is the leadership of the PSWMRU in Chesapeake Bay mitigation activities, reflected in the geographic organization of the proposed network by Bay watershed’s physiographic provinces that makes the proposed Upper Chesapeake Bay/ Susquehanna River component an appropriate starting point for the LTAR network.
    [Show full text]
  • Susquehanna Riyer Drainage Basin
    'M, General Hydrographic Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 109 Series -j Investigations, 13 .N, Water Power, 9 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR HYDROGRAPHY OF THE SUSQUEHANNA RIYER DRAINAGE BASIN BY JOHN C. HOYT AND ROBERT H. ANDERSON WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1 9 0 5 CONTENTS. Page. Letter of transmittaL_.__.______.____.__..__.___._______.._.__..__..__... 7 Introduction......---..-.-..-.--.-.-----............_-........--._.----.- 9 Acknowledgments -..___.______.._.___.________________.____.___--_----.. 9 Description of drainage area......--..--..--.....-_....-....-....-....--.- 10 General features- -----_.____._.__..__._.___._..__-____.__-__---------- 10 Susquehanna River below West Branch ___...______-_--__.------_.--. 19 Susquehanna River above West Branch .............................. 21 West Branch ....................................................... 23 Navigation .--..........._-..........-....................-...---..-....- 24 Measurements of flow..................-.....-..-.---......-.-..---...... 25 Susquehanna River at Binghamton, N. Y_-..---...-.-...----.....-..- 25 Ghenango River at Binghamton, N. Y................................ 34 Susquehanna River at Wilkesbarre, Pa......_............-...----_--. 43 Susquehanna River at Danville, Pa..........._..................._... 56 West Branch at Williamsport, Pa .._.................--...--....- _ - - 67 West Branch at Allenwood, Pa.....-........-...-.._.---.---.-..-.-.. 84 Juniata River at Newport, Pa...-----......--....-...-....--..-..---.-
    [Show full text]
  • Kayaking • Fishing • Lodging Table of Contents
    KAYAKING • FISHING • LODGING TABLE OF CONTENTS Fishing 4-13 Kayaking & Tubing 14-15 Rules & Regulations 16 Lodging 17-19 1 W. Market St. Lewistown, PA 17044 www.JRVVisitors.com 717-248-6713 [email protected] The Juniata River Valley Visitors Bureau thanks the following contributors to this directory. Without your knowledge and love of our waterways, this directory would not be possible. Joshua Hill Nick Lyter Brian Shumaker Penni Abram Paul Wagner Bob Wert Todd Jones Helen Orndorf Ryan Cherry Thankfully, The Juniata River Valley Visitors Bureau Jenny Landis, executive director Buffie Boyer, marketing assistant Janet Walker, distribution manager 2 PAFLYFISHING814 Welcome to the JUNIATA RIVER VALLEY Located in the heart of Central Pennsylvania, the Juniata River Valley, is named for the river that flows from Huntingdon County to Perry County where it meets the Susquehanna River. Spanning more than 100 miles, the Juniata River flows through a picturesque valley offering visitors a chance to explore the area’s wide fertile valleys, small towns, and the natural heritage of the region. The Juniata River watershed is comprised of more than 6,500 miles of streams, including many Class A fishing streams. The river and its tributaries are not the only defining characteristic of our landscape, but they are the center of our recreational activities. From traditional fishing to fly fishing, kayaking to camping, the area’s waterways are the ideal setting for your next fishing trip or family vacation. Come and “Discover Our Good Nature” any time of year! Find Us! The Juniata River Valley is located in Central Pennsylvania midway between State College and Harrisburg.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Streams
    Kayaking Small Streams The Yellow Breeches Creek, Cumberland County, is a great location to start your small stream kayak experience. It offers miles of easy paddling along with a water trail that highlights the paddling opportunities on this stream and provides maps that point out easy access. by Carl Haensel photos by the author Slip your kayak into the water off a country road in rural Pennsylvania, and your cares soon fade away. The forest glides by you on either side as you slip over riffles and float under bridges. Eight or ten miles pass in an afternoon as you explore a watershed far off the beaten path. A day like this spent kayaking on a small Pennsylvania stream is a day to be savored. Here are some tips, tricks and highlighted sections where you may find your own small-stream idyll. Paddling on a small stream What is small stream kayaking? For our use, a small stream in Pennsylvania is one that is less likely to receive Mixing fishing with kayaking is a great option while paddling small motorboat traffic and is best navigated by paddling. There Pennsylvania streams. Often, there are top-notch opportunities for are many streams that fit these criteria throughout the fishing for smallmouth bass, trout and other species. Target deep- Commonwealth from short, steep, rapid filled creeks water areas with good cover for fish such as large logs or other to placid, winding pastoral streams. While all paddlers submerged debris in the water. should be prepared when they hit the water, paddlers on small streams need to take extra care, because they are out of the way locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Middletown Borough
    369 East Park Drive Harrisburg, PA 17111 (717) 564-1121 www.hrg-inc.com July 2017 CHESAPEAKE BAY POLLUTANT REDUCTION PLAN FOR MIDDLETOWN BOROUGH PREPARED FOR: MIDDLETOWN BOROUGH DAUPHIN COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA HRG Project No. R000516.0459 ©Herbert, Rowland & Grubic, Inc., 2017 CHESAPEAKE BAY POLLUTION REDUCTION PLAN FOR MIDDLETOWN BOROUGH, DAUPHIN COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary Introduction Section A – Public Participation Section B – Mapping Section C – Pollutants of Concern Section D – Determine Existing Loading for Pollutants of Concern Section E – BMPs to Achieve the Required Pollutant Load Reductions Section F – Identify Funding Mechanism Section G – BMP Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Appendices Appendix A – Public Participation Documentation Appendix B – Mapping Appendix C – PADEP Municipal MS4 Requirements Tables Appendix D – Existing Pollutant Loading Calculations Appendix E – Proposed BMP Pollutant Load Reduction Calculations Chesapeake Bay Pollutant Reduction Plan Middletown Borough, Dauphin County, Pennsylvania Page 1 Introduction Middletown Borough discharges stormwater to surface waters located within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed and is therefore regulated by a PAG-13 General Permit, Appendix D (nutrients and sediment in stormwater discharges to waters in the Chesapeake Bay watershed). The Borough also has watershed impairments regulated by PAG-13 General Permit, Appendix E (nutrients and/or sediment in stormwater discharges to impaired waterways). This Chesapeake Bay Pollutant Reduction Plan (CBPRP) was developed in accordance with both PAG-13 requirements and documents how the Borough intends to achieve the pollutant reduction requirements listed in the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) Municipal MS4 Requirements Table1. This document was prepared following the guidance provided in the PADEP National Pollutant Discharges Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Discharges from Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems Pollutant Reduction Plan (PRP) Instructions2.
    [Show full text]
  • Conewago Creek Watershed York and Adams Counties
    01/09/01 INCOMPLETE DRAFT DEP Bureau of Watershed Management DO NOT COPY FOR PUBLIC Watershed Restoration Action Strategy (WRAS) State Water Plan Subbasin 07F (West) Conewago Creek Watershed York and Adams Counties Introduction The 510 square mile Subbasin 07F consists of the West Conewago Creek watershed in York and Adams Counties, which enters the west side of the Susquehanna River at York Haven. Major tributaries include Bermudian Creek, South Branch Conewago Creek, Little Conewago Creek, and Opossum Creek. A total of 903 streams flow for 1104 miles through the subbasin. The subbasin is included in HUC Area 2050306, Lower Susquehanna River a Category I, FY99/2000 Priority watershed in the Unified Watershed Assessment. Geology/Soils The geology of the subbasin is complex. The majority of the watershed is in the Northern Piedmont Ecoregion. The Triassic Lowlands (64a) consisting of sandstone, red shale, and siltstone of the Gettysburg and New Oxford Formations are interspersed throughout the watershed with the Diabase and Conglomerate Uplands (64b) consisting of Triassic/Jurassic diabase and argillite. 64a is an area of low rolling terrain with broad valleys and isolated hills. The soils derived from these rocks are generally less fertile than those derived from Piedmont limestone rocks but are more fertile than those derived from Piedmont igneous and metamorphic rocks. The sandstone and shale of the Gettysburg and New Oxford Formations are poorly cemented and have good porosity and permeability. These soils generally have moderate to high infiltration rates and yield a good supply of groundwater. The red Triassic sandstone is quarried for use as brick and stone building blocks.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Pennsylvania Summary of Fishing Regulations and Laws PERMITS, MULTI-YEAR LICENSES, BUTTONS
    2018PENNSYLVANIA FISHING SUMMARY Summary of Fishing Regulations and Laws 2018 Fishing License BUTTON WHAT’s NeW FOR 2018 l Addition to Panfish Enhancement Waters–page 15 l Changes to Misc. Regulations–page 16 l Changes to Stocked Trout Waters–pages 22-29 www.PaBestFishing.com Multi-Year Fishing Licenses–page 5 18 Southeastern Regular Opening Day 2 TROUT OPENERS Counties March 31 AND April 14 for Trout Statewide www.GoneFishingPa.com Use the following contacts for answers to your questions or better yet, go onlinePFBC to the LOCATION PFBC S/TABLE OF CONTENTS website (www.fishandboat.com) for a wealth of information about fishing and boating. THANK YOU FOR MORE INFORMATION: for the purchase STATE HEADQUARTERS CENTRE REGION OFFICE FISHING LICENSES: 1601 Elmerton Avenue 595 East Rolling Ridge Drive Phone: (877) 707-4085 of your fishing P.O. Box 67000 Bellefonte, PA 16823 Harrisburg, PA 17106-7000 Phone: (814) 359-5110 BOAT REGISTRATION/TITLING: license! Phone: (866) 262-8734 Phone: (717) 705-7800 Hours: 8:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. The mission of the Pennsylvania Hours: 8:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday PUBLICATIONS: Fish and Boat Commission is to Monday through Friday BOATING SAFETY Phone: (717) 705-7835 protect, conserve, and enhance the PFBC WEBSITE: Commonwealth’s aquatic resources EDUCATION COURSES FOLLOW US: www.fishandboat.com Phone: (888) 723-4741 and provide fishing and boating www.fishandboat.com/socialmedia opportunities. REGION OFFICES: LAW ENFORCEMENT/EDUCATION Contents Contact Law Enforcement for information about regulations and fishing and boating opportunities. Contact Education for information about fishing and boating programs and boating safety education.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Trout Streams Proposed Additions and Revisions January 2019
    Notice Classification of Wild Trout Streams Proposed Additions and Revisions January 2019 Under 58 Pa. Code §57.11 (relating to listing of wild trout streams), it is the policy of the Fish and Boat Commission (Commission) to accurately identify and classify stream sections supporting naturally reproducing populations of trout as wild trout streams. The Commission’s Fisheries Management Division maintains the list of wild trout streams. The Executive Director, with the approval of the Commission, will from time-to-time publish the list of wild trout streams in the Pennsylvania Bulletin. The listing of a stream section as a wild trout stream is a biological designation that does not determine how it is managed. The Commission relies upon many factors in determining the appropriate management of streams. At the next Commission meeting on January 14 and 15, 2019, the Commission will consider changes to its list of wild trout streams. Specifically, the Commission will consider the addition of the following streams or portions of streams to the list: County of Mouth Stream Name Section Limits Tributary To Mouth Lat/Lon UNT to Chest 40.594383 Cambria Headwaters to Mouth Chest Creek Creek (RM 30.83) 78.650396 Hubbard Hollow 41.481914 Cameron Headwaters to Mouth West Creek Run 78.375513 40.945831 Carbon Hazle Creek Headwaters to Mouth Black Creek 75.847221 Headwaters to SR 41.137289 Clearfield Slab Run Sandy Lick Creek 219 Bridge 78.789462 UNT to Chest 40.860565 Clearfield Headwaters to Mouth Chest Creek Creek (RM 1.79) 78.707129 41.132038 Clinton
    [Show full text]