2020 01 24 EL List of Meps

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

1 Oezlem Demirel DIE LINKE Germany Indirect 2 Helmut Scholz DIE LINKE Germany Indirect 3 Martin Schirdewan DIE LINKE Germany Indirect 4 Cornelia Ernst DIE LINKE Germany Indirect 5 Martina Michels DIE LINKE Germany Indirect 6 Manu Pineda Izquierda Unida Spain Indirect 7 Sira Rego Izquierda Unida Spain Indirect 8 Silvia Modig Left Alliance Finland Indirect 9 Nikolaj Villumsen Enhedslisten Denmark Indirect 10 Marisa Matias Bloco de Esquerda Portugal Indirect 11 Jose Gusmao Bloco de Esquerda Portugal Indirect 12 Stelios Kouloglou Coalition of the Radical Left - Syriza Greece Indirect 13 Elena Kountoura Coalition of the Radical Left - Syriza Greece Indirect 14 Dimitrios Papadimoulis Coalition of the Radical Left - Syriza Greece Indirect 15 Alexis Georgoulis Coalition of the Radical Left - Syriza Greece Indirect 16 Konstantinos Arvanitis Coalition of the Radical Left - Syriza Greece Indirect 17 Petros Kokkalis Coalition of the Radical Left - Syriza Greece Indirect 18 Katerina Konecna KSCM Czech Republic direct 19 Giorgos Georgiou AKEL Cyprus direct 20 Niyazi Kizilyuerek AKEL Cyprus direct 21 Miguel Urban Crespo Podemos Spain direct 22 Eugenia Rodriguez Palop Podemos/Independent Spain direct 23 Idoia Villanueva Ruiz Podemos Spain direct 24 Martin Buschmann Partei Mensch Umwelt Tierschutz Germany direct 25 Manuel Bompard La France Insoumise France direct 26 Leila Chaibi La France Insoumise France direct 27 Emmanuel Maurel Gauche Republicaine et Socialiste France direct 28 Younous Omarjee La France Insoumise France direct 29 Anne-Sophie Pelletier La France Insoumise France direct 30 Manon Aubry La France Insoumise France direct.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Holy and Great Council Moving Forward; Patriarch Arrives Bartholomew Makes Last-Minute Request, but Russians and Other Churches Not Attending
S O C V st ΓΡΑΦΕΙ ΤΗΝ ΙΣΤΟΡΙΑ W ΤΟΥ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ E 101 ΑΠΟ ΤΟ 1915 The National Herald anniversa ry N www.thenationalherald.com A wEEkly GrEEk-AmEriCAN PuBliCATiON 1915-2016 VOL. 19, ISSUE 975 June 18-24, 2016 c v $1.50 Holy and Great Council Moving Forward; Patriarch Arrives Bartholomew Makes Last-Minute Request, but Russians and Other Churches not Attending By Theodore Kalmoukos to 28. For months now, a Small Synaxis of the Primates has been CRETE, GREECE – The Ortho - scheduled for June 17th as well. dox Church from throughout The agenda items are: 1) The the world will gather for a his - mission of the Orthodox Church toric Holy and Great Council in the contemporary world; 2) (also called the Great Synod) on The Orthodox diaspora; 3) Au - Crete, scheduled at press time tonomy and the manner of its from June 19 through 27, to proclamation; 4) The sacrament witness its unity and strength of marriage and its impedi - speaking with one voice and one ments; 5) The importance of heart, despite attempts made by fasting and its observance to - some Local Orthodox Churches day; and 6) The relationship of to postpone it. the Orthodox Church with the Specifically, the Churches of rest of the Christian world. Bulgaria, Russia, Georgia, and On June 15, Bartholomew Antioch decided not to partici - made a last-minute plea inviting pate in the Synod, invoking rea - all the Churches to participate. sons about the texts and docu - He was warmly greeted at the ments and also the ongoing airport by His Eminence Arch - dispute between the ancient and bishop Irineos of Crete and historic Patriarchates of Antioch members of the Holy Synod of and Jerusalem over the issue of the Semi-Autonomous Church the canonical and ecclesiastical of Crete, Undersecretary of For - jurisdiction of the Archdiocese eign Affairs of Greece Ioannis of Qatar, established some three Amanatidis, the Mayor of Cha - years ago by the Patriarchate of nia Tasos Vamboukas, and other TNH/COSTAS BEJ Jerusalem.
[Show full text]
To: Dr. Ursula Von Der Leyen President of the European Commission Cc: Ms. Věra Jourová Vice-President for Values A
To: Dr. Ursula von der Leyen President of the European Commission cc: Ms. Věra Jourová Vice-President for Values and Transparency Athens, 16 April 2021 Subject: Ensuring journalists’ safety and physical integrity in the EU Dear President von der Leyen, Dear Vice-President Jourová, We are writing to you in relation to the brutal killing of the Greek journalist George Karaivaz. It is regrettably another despicable act, which follows the assassination of Daphne Caruana Galizia in Malta in 2017 and of Ján Kuciak in Slovakia in 2018. Physical threats and violence against journalists have been, unfortunately, on the rise. These crimes can lead to media’s self-censorship and therefore, have a grave chilling effect on freedom of expression, as enshrined in Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Press has a vital role to play in the functioning of a democratic society. Journalists’ public watchdog role is crucial for a democratic society, based on the rule of law. Moreover, it has an instrumental role in ensuring an open and vigorous public debate, thereby reinforcing the public’s trust in our democratic processes. In this regard, we need to do away with the sense of impunity for crimes against journalists. Therefore, we call upon you to use all means at your disposal towards guaranteeing the safety and physical integrity of journalists in the EU. This includes a swift adoption of a Recommendation on the safety of journalists, as outlined in the 2020 European Democracy Action Plan. The Recommendation should have a significant focus on threats against women journalists, who are also increasingly subject to online and offline threats.
[Show full text]
GREECE the Odyssey to Reinvention Photo: Shutterstock / Nick Pavlakis
Sponsored Report GREECE THE ODYSSEY TO REINVENTION Photo: Shutterstock / Nick Pavlakis GREECE The odyssey to reinvention After a successful conclusion to the Eurogroup’s second review of Greece’s current bailout program, coupled with a major economic transition and substantial regulatory reforms, the country is rapidly reinventing itself. Everything points towards 2017 being the year of the ‘Hellenic Turnaround’ Photo: Shutterstock / Olimpiu Pop All signs suggest that the Greek kets,” according to Minister of Fi- politically.” preneurship, foreign investment economy is on its way back to nance Euclid Tsakalotos. When President Barack Obama and a productive model that adds growth, after seven years of reces- visited Greece in 2016, he said “the value and is export orientated. In sion, during which the country lost Wide-ranging reforms world, I don’t think, fully appreci- 2016, exports grew by 10%, while more than a quarter of its GDP. As part of the original 2015 bailout ates the extraordinary pain these investments increased 12% and, 2017 has already seen its economy program, the Greek government reforms have involved, or the tre- according to Odisseas Athanas- grow by 0.4% in the first quarter recognized that it had to restore mendous sacrifices that you, the siou, CEO of property developer and the country’s government is and safeguard fiscal sustainability, Greek people, have made,” a senti- Lamda Development, “there has forecasting increases of close to 2% implement structural policies for ment echoed by Greek Prime Min- been a substantial
[Show full text]
Greece Political Briefing: Greek Politics in 2019 George N
ISSN: 2560-1601 Vol. 24, No. 1 (GR) Dec 2019 Greece political briefing: Greek politics in 2019 George N. Tzogopoulos 1052 Budapest Petőfi Sándor utca 11. +36 1 5858 690 Kiadó: Kína-KKE Intézet Nonprofit Kft. [email protected] Szerkesztésért felelős személy: Chen Xin Kiadásért felelős személy: Huang Ping china-cee.eu 2017/01 Greek politics in 2019 Following 4,5 years of SYRIZA (and Independent Greeks) administration, Greece saw a governmental change in 2019. The conservative New Democracy won the national election of 5 July and Kyriakos Mitsotakis became the new prime minister. While the first semester of the year was full with political tensions in view of the national election, the second was relatively calm. The government of New Democracy enjoyed a grace period and was not encountered with significant political challenges. The law allowing Greeks living abroad to vote was one of its successes and received broad political support. 2019 was an election year for Greece. All opinion polls were suggesting that the governing SYRIZA party would lose the national election to the main opposition New Democracy party. This happened in July indeed. The way until the national election was full with political tensions. The year started with the coalition government of SYRIZA-Independent Greek charting separate courses after 4,5 years of close cooperation. The main reason for the divorce was the opposition of the leader of Independent Greeks and Defense Minister Panos Kammenos to the Prespes Agreement signed between Greece and North Macedonia. When this Agreement came to the Greek Parliament for approval, Kammenos withdrew his support to the Greek government.
[Show full text]
068646/EU XXVII. GP Eingelangt Am 12/07/21
068646/EU XXVII. GP Eingelangt am 12/07/21 Council of the European Union Brussels, 12 July 2021 (OR. en) 10684/21 OJ CRP1 27 PROVISIONAL AGENDA PERMANENT REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE (Part 1) Justus Lipsius building, Brussels 14 July 2021 (15.00) Format 1+1 (+1 in listening room) 1. Adoption of the agenda Approval of 'I' items in Annex Discussion items (II) Agriculture 2. Regulation on the extension of the term of Community plant 10620/21 + COR 1 variety rights Presidency debriefing on the outcome of the trilogue Analysis of the final compromise text with a view to agreement Environment 3. Regulation amending Aarhus Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 Presidency debriefing on the outcome of the trilogue 10684/21 MD 1 GIP EN www.parlament.gv.at Health 4. Regulation on a reinforced role for the European Medicines Agency in crisis preparedness and management for medicinal products and medical devices Presidency debriefing on the outcome of the trilogue Transport 5. Regulations on Single European Sky 2 + Presidency debriefing on the outcome of the trilogue Any other business Fit For 55 legislative package Presentation by the Commission 10684/21 MD 2 GIP EN www.parlament.gv.at ANNEX Non-discussion items (I) Institutional Affairs Written questions 6. Replies to questions for written answer submitted to the Council 10613/21 by Members of the European Parliament PE-QE Adoption by silence procedure a) Nacho Sánchez Amor (S&D) 9968/21 "EU Delegation to Turkey" b) Dimitr ios Papadimoulis (The Left), Konstantinos 9877/21 Arvanitis (The Left), Alexis Georgoulis
[Show full text]
047464/EU XXVII. GP Eingelangt Am 20/01/21
047464/EU XXVII. GP Eingelangt am 20/01/21 Council of the European Union Brussels, 20 January 2021 (OR. en) 14160/20 CRS CRP 50 SUMMARY RECORD PERMANENT REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE 7 and 9 December 2020 I. Adoption of the agenda 13703/1/20 REV 1 OJ CRP2 46 13736/1/20 REV 1 OJ CRP1 46 The Committee adopted the agenda. II. Approval of the "I" items The Committee approved the "I" items as set out in the Annex. III. Discussion items COREPER (PART 2) Justice and Home Affairs 3. Meeting of the Council (Justice and Home Affairs) on 14 December 2020: Preparation a) Pact on Migration and Asylum1 13609/20 Policy debate The Committee prepared this item for the Council meeting. b) (poss.) Regulation on preventing the dissemination of terrorist content online Information on provisional agreement The Committee prepared this item for the Council meeting. 1 Exceptionally, in the presence of the Schengen Associated States. 14160/20 1 GIP.1 EN www.parlament.gv.at c) Other items in connection with the Council meeting The Presidency provided further information regarding the Council meeting. 2. Informal videoconference of the Ministers of Justice 2 December 2020: Follow-up The above-mentioned item was withdrawn. 14160/20 2 GIP.1 EN www.parlament.gv.at COREPER (PART 1) Fisheries 11. Regulation on the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) Presidency debriefing on the outcome of the trilogue The Committee took note of the information provided by the Presidency on the outcome of the trilogue of 3 December 2020. Agriculture and Fisheries 12.
[Show full text]
Question for Written Answer
Question for written answer E-001496/2021 to the Commission Rule 138 Dimitrios Papadimoulis (The Left), Alexis Georgoulis (The Left), Petros Kokkalis (The Left), Stelios Kouloglou (The Left), Elena Kountoura (The Left), Konstantinos Arvanitis (The Left) Subject: Protecting freedom of expression on social media The social media provide a public forum for exchanges of views regarding the social and political scene and are exercising a growing influence on public opinion. At the same time, they are, to a growing extent, interfering with content, invoking their conditions of use to delete posts or suspend user accounts. This raises serious issues directly related to democratic freedom of expression1, something that has thus far been left to the management mechanisms developed by the private networking platforms concerned. Aware of the need to protect citizens’ rights in the digital age, the Commission has recently issued a proposal for the Digital Services Act2, the provisions of which are applicable to platforms across the board, especially regarding freedom of expression. In view of this: Does the Commission consider the content management mechanisms developed by private social media platforms to be adequate and secure? What action has it taken with a view to protecting citizens’ rights more effectively and, in consultation with users, creating, implementing and keeping under review a transparent framework for their participation, bearing in mind the serious breaches of their rights by the platforms? What measures will it take to effectively protect citizens’ rights, in particular freedom of expression, pending entry into force of the Digital Services Act? 1 See also the European Parliament resolution of 20 October 2020 on the Digital Services Act and fundamental rights issues posed, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0274_EN.html 2 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EL/TXT/?qid=1608117147218&uri=COM%3A2020%3A825%3AFIN PE691.030v01-00.
[Show full text]
President of the European Council, Mr. Charles Michel Cc: Head of Task Force for Relations with the United Kingdom, Mr
Το: President of the European Council, Mr. Charles Michel Cc: Head of Task Force for Relations with the United Kingdom, Mr. Michel Barnier «What does Shakespeare mean to England? Saint Paul’s cathedral? What does the Taj Mahal mean to India? What do the paintings in the Sistine Chapel mean to Italy? The Parthenon marbles are our pride. They are our identity. They are today’s link with Greek Excellence. They are creations synonymous with our concepts of democracy and freedom.» Melina Merkouri Recent reports based on a leaked draft document of the new EU-UK trade deal claim that a new paragraph was negotiated regarding the return “unlawfully removed cultural objects”1. Early reports linked this paragraph with the Parthenon Marbles, despite being dismissed as unfounded, we feel obliged to stress our undeniable support to the cause of the reunification of the Parthenon Marbles. They are not merely marbles, meaning just limestone composed by recrystallized carbonate minerals, they are sculptures. Sculptures of high cultural value for Greece and irrefutable part of Greece’s heritage. The Parthenon itself is a world-renowned monument, a symbol of our earliest traces of civilization and essential concepts of polity in the European peninsula. A remnant of the golden age that was marked with the birth of the notion of a union (Delian League) and the production of some of the most influential and enduring cultural artefacts of the Western tradition. The citadel of Acropolis, also inscribed in the UNESCO World Heritage catalogue2 and characterized as Statement of Outstanding Universal Value for World Heritage 3, stands for centuries above Athens with Parthenon being the most famous of its parts and despite the numerous catastrophes, it faced throughout history no other can be compared with those during the late 17th - early 19th century.
[Show full text]
Priority Question for Written Answer
Priority question for written answer P-000386/2020 to the Commission Rule 138 Konstantinos Arvanitis (GUE/NGL), Dimitrios Papadimoulis (GUE/NGL), Stelios Kouloglou (GUE/NGL), Elena Kountoura (GUE/NGL), Petros Kokkalis (GUE/NGL), Alexis Georgoulis (GUE/NGL) Subject: Retroactive legislation resulting in the removal of administrators serving on the Greek Competition Commission Legislation has recently been adopted establishing new criteria for the eligibility of administrators to serve on the Greek Competition Commission. These criteria are being made to apply retroactively to those already serving in this capacity, resulting in their immediate removal. However, the case-law established by the EU Court of Justice makes it clear that the independence of such official bodies must be respected and their members allowed to complete their terms of office. In line with the above case law, a recent European Parliament directive (on Member State competition authorities) expressly stipulates conditions of eligibility to serve (Preamble and Article 17(4)). While it has yet to be transposed into national law, the Court of Justice of the EU has repeatedly ruled that, in the meantime, Member States must refrain from adopting provisions that compromise the intended outcome. In view of this: What measures will the Commission take in response to these recently adopted national provisions that retroactively disqualify administrators already serving on the body in question, resulting in their early removal, while failing to establish rules ensuring that the independence and impartiality of the authority are not affected (C-424/15, paragraph 52 and C-288/12, paragraphs 60-61)? Will it seek to ensure that administrators serving on the Greek Competition Commission are able to complete their term of office under the transitional provisions of Greek Law 4623/2019, as in the past (2016/2011), in order to ensure that no discrimination occurs in the present case? PE647.740v01-00.
[Show full text]
Brussels, 30 October 2020 Tilly Metz and Miguel Urbán Crespo
Brussels, 30 October 2020 Tilly Metz and Miguel Urbán Crespo European Parliament [email protected] [email protected] To the President, H.E. Juan Orlando Hernández To the Minister of Foreign Affairs, H.E. Lisandro Rosales Benegas To the President of the Supreme Court of Justice, Rolando Argueta Pérez To the Attorney General of Honduras, Oscar Fernando Chinchilla Banegas To the Secretary of State for Governance, Justice and Decentralization, Héctor Leonel Ayala Alvarenga To the Secretary of Human Rights, Karla Cueva To the National Human Rights Commissioner, CONADEH, Dr. Roberto Herrera To the National Mechanism for the Prevention of Torture, NPM-CONAPREV RE: Subject: Call to free Guapinol rights defenders Excellences, We, the undersigned Members of the European Parliament, are writing to you to express our deepest concerns over the current situation of the Sakharov Prize´s finalists: Guapinol Human rights defenders and Berta Cáceres. We are particularly worried about the members of the Municipal Committee in Defense of Common and Public Goods of Tocoa (Comité Municipal de Defensa de los Bienes Comunes y Públicos de Tocoa) currently jailed: Porfirio Sorto Cedillo, José Avelino Cedillo, Orbin Naún Hernández, Kevin Alejandro Romero, Arnold Javier Aleman, Ever Alexander Cedillo, Daniel Marquez and Jeremías Martínez Díaz. We, as members of the European Parliament already sent you a letter on 6 April 2020 expressing our deepest concerns about the situation of the human rights defenders of the Guapinol. Now the human rights defenders have spent more than one year in pretrial detention with no sound legal justification and criminalization against them and against the community has further increased.
[Show full text]
Brussels, 6. May 2021 Dear President Von Der Leyen, Dear Executive Vice
Brussels, 6. May 2021 Dear President von der Leyen, Dear Executive Vice President Dombrovskis, Dear Vice President Schinas, Dear Commissioner Breton, Dear Commission Kyriakides, late last night the United States Trade Representative Katherine Tai released a statement that the Biden-Harris administration will support the waiving of intellectual property protection for COVID-19 vaccines. We, the undersigned Members of the European Parliament, urge you to drop your opposition and to actively support the adoption of the proposal for a temporary ‘Waiver from certain provisions of the TRIPS Agreement for the prevention, containment and treatment of COVID-19. According to the data from the WHO there have been 154,815,600 confirmed cases of COVID-19, including 3,236,104 deaths1. There is an urgent need for strong international collaboration to speed and scale up manufacturing, to expand the supply of effective medical technologies and to work with governments and manufacturers to ensure fair and equitable allocation of the vaccines for all countries so that everyone, no matter where they live, is protected. We are experiencing shortages of supply and few wealthy countries were able to secure the biggest share of vaccine doses, leaving a majority of the global population living in low-and-middle income countries without any opportunity to receive vaccine 1 https://covid19.who.int/ (6. May 2021) doses. At the same time pharmaceutical companies approach to intellectual property remains business-as-usual, limiting manufacturing and supply capacities. While we fully support the European Union’s financial contributions to the Access to COVID-19 Tools Accelerator and its vaccine pillar the COVAX Facility for the purchase of potential COVID-19 vaccines, it is simply not enough.
[Show full text]
Domestic Violence During Coronavirus Pandemic
H.E. Ursula von der Leyen President European Commission European Parliament, 11 May 2020 RE: RISE OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE DURING CORONAVIRUS EPIDEMIC Honourable President, We, undersigned members of the European Parliament are sincerely worried about the dramatic increase in domestic violence cases during the lockdown caused by the coronavirus epidemics in the member states of the European Union and beyond. We are of the conviction that both member states and the European Commission should introduce special measures to protect effective and potential victims of domestic violence. French Secretary of State for Gender Equality, Marlène Schiappa revealed that domestic violence across France increased by 32% in one week, in Paris alone it rose by as much as 36%. The French secretary of state rightly pointed out that addressing the situation has become more difficult, and even the emergency number to report domestic abuses has received fewer calls due to the fact that during quarantine “the victims are on lockdown with their abusers”. Another member state, notably the Hungarian government, used the pandemic to have the Parliament adopted a resolution in an extraordinary procedure to reject the Istanbul Convention becoming legally binding in Hungary and the European Union. Deputy Prime Minister Mr Zsolt Semjén’s argued that while the government wanted to eliminate violence, the aim of the Istanbul Convention is to eliminate the families. As you can see, the attitudes of member states can be much diverse. The rise of domestic violence, however, is a dramatic development in all of our member states. Due to the lockdown, tolerance in many families decrease, the functioning of state agencies and civil society organisations is also limited, and victims have fewer opportunities to seek for protection.
[Show full text]