DOCSLIB.ORG

UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Deaf History in K-12 DHH Classrooms Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5qf7n173 Author Clark, Allison H Publication Date 2015 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Deaf History in K-12 DHH Classrooms A Thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Masters of Arts in Teaching and Learning: Bilingual Education (ASL- English) by Allison Clark Committee in charge: Tom Humphries, Chair Bobbie M. Allen Carol Padden 2015 © Allison Clark, 2015 All rights reserved. The thesis of Allison Clark is approved and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Chair University of California, San Diego 2015 iii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to all of the amazing Deaf students who have taught me, and to all those whom I will learn from in the future. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature page ............................................................................................................ iii Dedication ................................................................................................................... iv Table of contents ......................................................................................................... v List of Figures ............................................................................................................ vii Acknowledgements ................................................................................................... xii Abstract of Thesis ..................................................................................................... xiii I. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 II. Approach to Bilingual Education ............................................................................ 3 III. Justification of Need ............................................................................................ 10 IV. Review of Existing Curricula and Materials ....................................................... 13 V. Learning Theories ................................................................................................. 16 VI. Curriculum Format .............................................................................................. 20 VII. Evaluation Plan ................................................................................................. 22 VIII. Curriculum Implementation .............................................................................. 24 IX. Evaluation ............................................................................................................ 39 X. Conclusion ............................................................................................................ 52 XI. Appendix A: Curriculum ................................................................................... 55 Appendix B: Pre-survey ........................................................................................ 132 Appendix C: “K/L” chart part 1 .............................................................................. 138 Appendix D: Activity 1.1.2 Student Artifacts ......................................................... 139 Appendix E: Activity 1.1.3 Student Artifacts .......................................................... 148 Appendix F: Activity 1.2.2 Student Artifacts .......................................................... 151 v Appendix G: Activity 1.2.3 Student Artifacts ......................................................... 160 Appendix H: Activity 1.3.2 Student Artifacts ......................................................... 163 Appendix I: Activity 1.3.3 Student Artifacts ........................................................... 166 Appendix J: Activity 1.4.2 Student Artifacts .......................................................... 169 Appendix K: Activity 1.4.4 Student Artifacts ......................................................... 172 Appendix L: Post Survey Student Artifacts ............................................................ 175 Appendix M: “K/L” chart part 2 .............................................................................. 180 XII. References ........................................................................................................ 181 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure 8: Alan - 1.1.2 Who is Alice? ................................................................................ 45 Figure 15: Jiovan - 1.1.2 Who is Cogswell? ..................................................................... 45 Figure 22: Lexi - 1.1.2 Who is Gallaudet? ...................................................................... 46 Figure 28: Jiovan - 1.1.3 Retelling the Story .................................................................. 46 Figure 36: Dawn - 1.2.2 What is the Paris School for the Deaf? ..................................... 47 Figure 38: Jiovan - 1.2.2 Who is Laurent Clerc? .............................................................. 47 Figure 46: Lexi - 1.2.2 Who is Abbe Sicard? ................................................................... 48 Figure 55: Oliver - 1.2.3 Retelling the Story .................................................................... 48 Figure 57: Dawn - 1.3.2 What did they do on the ship? ................................................... 49 Figure 65: Kenzie - 1.3.3 Retelling the Story ................................................................... 49 Figure 68: Alan - 1.4.2 Retelling the Story ....................................................................... 50 Figure 78: 1.4.4 ASL Tree ................................................................................................ 50 Figure 1: Page 1 of Alan's pre-survey ............................................................................. 132 Figure 1.2: Page 2 of Alan's pre-survey .......................................................................... 132 Figure 2: Page 1 of Dawn's pre-survey ........................................................................... 133 Figure 2.2: Page 2 of Dawn's pre-survey ........................................................................ 133 Figure 3: Page 1 of Jiovan's pre-survey .......................................................................... 134 Figure 3.3: Page 2 of Jiovan's pre-survey ....................................................................... 134 Figure 4: Page 1 of Kenzie's pre-survey ......................................................................... 135 Figure 4.4: Page 2 of Kenzie's pre-survey ...................................................................... 135 Figure 5: Page 1 of Lexi's pre-survey ............................................................................. 136 vii Figure 5.5: Page 2 of Lexi's pre-survey .......................................................................... 136 Figure 6: Page 1 of Oliver's pre-survey .......................................................................... 137 Figure 6.6: Page 2 of Oliver's pre-survey ....................................................................... 137 Figure 7:“K/L” chart - What we already know ............................................................... 138 Figure 8: Alan - 1.1.2 Who is Alice? .............................................................................. 139 Figure 9: Alan - 1.1.2 Who is Cogswell?........................................................................ 139 Figure 10: Alan - 1.1.2 Who is Gallaudet? ..................................................................... 140 Figure 11: Dawn - 1.1.2 Who is Alice? .......................................................................... 140 Figure 12: Dawn - 1.1.2 Who is Cogswell? .................................................................... 141 Figure 13: Dawn - 1.1.2 Who is Gallaudet? ................................................................... 141 Figure 14: Jiovan - 1.1.2 Who is Alice? ......................................................................... 142 Figure 15: Jiovan - 1.1.2 Who is Cogswell? ................................................................... 142 Figure 16: Jiovan - 1.1.2 Who is Gallaudet? .................................................................. 143 Figure 17: Kenzie - 1.1.2 Who is Alice? ........................................................................ 143 Figure 18: Kenzie - 1.1.2 Who is Cogswell? .................................................................. 144 Figure 19: Kenzie - 1.1.2 Who is Gallaudet? .................................................................. 144 Figure 20: Lexi - 1.1.2 Who is Alice? ............................................................................ 145 Figure 21: Lexi - 1.1.2 Who is Cogswell? ...................................................................... 145 Figure 22: Lexi - 1.1.2 Who is Gallaudet? ...................................................................... 146 Figure 23: Oliver - 1.1.2 Who is Alice?.......................................................................... 146 Figure 24: Oliver - 1.1.2 Who is Cogswell? ................................................................... 147 Figure 25: Oliver - 1.1.2 Who is Gallaudet? ................................................................... 147 Figure 26: Alan
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Deaf-History-Part-1
    [from The HeART of Deaf Culture: Literary and Artistic Expressions of Deafhood by Karen Christie and Patti Durr, 2012] The Chain of Remembered Gratitude: The Heritage and History of the DEAF-WORLD in the United States PART ONE Note: The names of Deaf individuals appear in bold italics throughout this chapter. In addition, names of Deaf and Hearing historical figures appearing in blue are briefly described in "Who's Who" which can be accessed via the Overview Section of this Project (for English text) or the Timeline Section (for ASL). "The history of the Deaf is no longer only that of their education or of their hearing teachers. It is the history of Deaf people in its long march, with its hopes, its sufferings, its joys, its angers, its defeats and its victories." Bernard Truffaut (1993) Honor Thy Deaf History © Nancy Rourke 2011 Introduction The history of the DEAF-WORLD is one that has constantly had to counter the falsehood that has been attributed to Aristotle that "Those who are born deaf all become senseless and incapable of reason."1 Our long march to prove that being Deaf is all right and that natural signed languages are equal to spoken languages has been well documented in Deaf people's literary and artistic expressions. The 1999 World Federation of the Deaf Conference in Sydney, Australia, opened with the "Blue Ribbon Ceremony" in which various people from the global Deaf community stated, in part: "...We celebrate our proud history, our arts, and our cultures... we celebrate our survival...And today, let us remember that many of us and our ancestors have suffered at the hands of those who believe we should not be here.
    [Show full text]
  • Deaf American Historiography, Past, Present, and Future
    CRITICAL DISABILITY DISCOURSES/ 109 DISCOURS CRITIQUES DANS LE CHAMP DU HANDICAP 7 The Story of Mr. And Mrs. Deaf: Deaf American Historiography, Past, Present, and Future Haley Gienow-McConnella aDepartment of History, York University [email protected] Abstract This paper offers a review of deaf American historiography, and proposes that future scholarship would benefit from a synthesis of historical biography and critical analysis. In recent deaf historical scholarship there exists a tendency to privilege the study of the Deaf community and deaf institutions as a whole over the study of the individuals who comprise the community and populate the institutions. This paper argues that the inclusion of diverse deaf figures is an essential component to the future of deaf history. However, historians should not lapse in to straight-forward biography in the vein of their eighteenth and nineteenth-century predecessors. They must use these stories purposefully to advance larger discussions about the history of the deaf and of the United States. The Deaf community has never been monolithic, and in order to fully realize ‘deaf’ as a useful category of historical analysis, the definition of which deaf stories are worth telling must broaden. Biography, when coupled with critical historical analysis, can enrich and diversify deaf American historiography. Key Words Deaf history; historiography; disability history; biography; American; identity. THE STORY OF MR. AND MRS. DEAF 110 L'histoire de «M et Mme Sourde »: l'historiographie des personnes Sourdes dans le passé, le présent et l'avenir Résumé Le présent article offre un résumé de l'historiographie de la surdité aux États-Unis, et propose que dans le futur, la recherche bénéficierait d'une synthèse de la biographie historique et d’une analyse critique.
    [Show full text]
  • Boognl,Emily the Development of ASL Copy
    22222 The Development of American Sign Language Emily Boognl Junior Division Paper Paper: 2,393 words Process Paper: 323 words 22222 Process Paper I chose my topic because in my last year of elementary school one of my teachers had an American Sign Language dictionary, and some of my friends and I were very interested in it and wanted to learn bits and pieces of ASL. The development of ASL relates to the annual theme of communication because ASL is how people who are deaf communicate with each other along with those that are hearing. I conducted my research by going to the internet, and I found some helpful evidence to support my side of the story. I also tried to find an argumentative side to my opinion when I did my research. I went to the public library and got a book about ASL that I used to do some of my research. One of my most important resources was Mrs. Karol McGregor, who is apart of the deaf community and deals with deafness everyday. When I created my project I really just did my research and then started to write. For me it is easiest to write down the important facts and then move them around and place them where they needed to be. My historical argument is that learning sign language and being able to speak sign is very important. Being able to speak sign language is a life skill for not only people who are deaf, but for those that want to be all inclusive to any person whether they are hearing or deaf.
    [Show full text]
  • Deaf History Notes Unit 1.Pdf
    Deaf History Notes by Brian Cerney, Ph.D. 2 Deaf History Notes Table of Contents 5 Preface 6 UNIT ONE - The Origins of American Sign Language 8 Section 1: Communication & Language 8 Communication 9 The Four Components of Communication 11 Modes of Expressing and Perceiving Communication 13 Language Versus Communication 14 The Three Language Channels 14 Multiple Language Encoding Systems 15 Identifying Communication as Language – The Case for ASL 16 ASL is Not a Universal Language 18 Section 2: Deaf Education & Language Stability 18 Pedro Ponce DeLeón and Private Education for Deaf Children 19 Abbé de l'Epée and Public Education for Deaf Children 20 Abbé Sicard and Jean Massieu 21 Laurent Clerc and Thomas Hopkins Gallaudet 23 Martha's Vineyard 24 The Connecticut Asylum for the Education and Instruction of Deaf and Dumb Persons 27 Unit One Summary & Review Questions 30 Unit One Bibliography & Suggested Readings 32 UNIT TWO - Manualism & the Fight for Self-Empowerment 34 Section 1: Language, Culture & Oppression 34 Language and Culture 35 The Power of Labels 35 Internalized Oppression 37 Section 2: Manualism Versus Oralism 37 The New England Gallaudet Association 37 The American Annals of the Deaf 38 Edward Miner Gallaudet, the Columbia Institution for the Instruction of the Deaf and Dumb, and the National Deaf-Mute College 39 Alexander Graham Bell and the American Association to Promote the Teaching of Speech to the Deaf 40 The National Association of the Deaf 42 The International Convention of Instructors of the Deaf in Milan, Italy 44
    [Show full text]
  • The Deaf Do Not Beg: Making the Case for Citizenship, 1880-1956
    The Deaf Do Not Beg: Making the Case for Citizenship, 1880-1956 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Octavian Elijah Robinson Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2012 Dissertation Committee: Susan Hartmann, Advisor Paula Baker Susan Burch Judy Tzu-Chun Wu Copyright by Octavian Elijah Robinson 2012 Abstract This dissertation examines deaf people’s anxieties about their place in American society and the political economy from 1880 to 1956. My study highlights how deaf people sought to place themselves within mainstream society through their activism to protect and advance their status as citizen-workers. Their activism centered on campaigns against peddling. Those campaigns sought to protect the public image of deaf people as worker-citizens while protecting their language and cultural community. The rhetoric surrounding impostorism and peddling reveals ableist attitudes; anxieties about the oral method supplanting sign language based education for the deaf; fears and insecurities about deaf people’s place in the American economy; class consciousness; and efforts to achieve full social citizenship. Deaf people’s notion of equal citizenship was that of white male citizenship with full access to economic opportunities. Their idea of citizenship extended to the legal and social right to employment and economic self-sufficiency. This is a historical account of the deaf community’s campaign during the late nineteenth and first half of the twentieth century to promote deaf people within American society as equal citizens and to improve their access to economic opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Methods Debate Within Deaf Education in Historical Perspective
    Signs versus Whispers: The Methods debate within Deaf Education in Historical Perspective with the Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind (FSDB) as a case study. Melissa Klatzkow Klatzkow 2 Table of Contents: Introduction: 3 Chapter One: Prelude to the oralist movement: 9 Chapter Two: The Changes In Sentiments: 16 Chapter Three: The “Rise” of Oralism: 23 Chapter Four: The Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind; St. Augustine: 33 Epilogue: 51 Conclusion: 57 Glossary: 63 Bibliography: 64 Klatzkow 3 Introduction Mr. and Mrs. Cole were like any couple, living in a typical town at the turn of the century. They lived in an average house and worked normal jobs. They attended church and were, for all intents and purposes, model citizens. Several years into their marriage, they had a daughter they named Susan. At first, the Coles’ were delighted—they had wanted a child for some time now—but soon they began noticing that their daughter was developmentally behind. Mrs. Cole noticed it first. She realized that, where her friend’s babies had begun to babble, her own was silent. At first, she brushed it off and decided to ignore it, but as Susan grew older and no speech became apparent, the Coles’ concern grew. Eventually, they took Susan to a doctor, only to have their worst fears confirmed—Susan was deaf. This shocked the Coles—neither had a deaf relative and Susan had always been very healthy. Their doctor began telling them about how their daughter would enter a residential school, where she would have little contact with them for most of the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Movement in Sign Languages: a Study of Six Languages
    Swarthmore College Works Linguistics Faculty Works Linguistics 2011 Primary Movement In Sign Languages: A Study Of Six Languages Donna Jo Napoli Swarthmore College, [email protected] M. Mai N. Gaw Follow this and additional works at: https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-linguistics Let us know how access to these works benefits ouy Recommended Citation Donna Jo Napoli, M. Mai, and N. Gaw. (2011). "Primary Movement In Sign Languages: A Study Of Six Languages". Primary Movement In Sign Languages: A Study Of Six Languages. https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-linguistics/52 This work is brought to you for free by Swarthmore College Libraries' Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Linguistics Faculty Works by an authorized administrator of Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Introduction The past fifty years have witnessed a flowering of research on sign languages, largely on their phonology and morphology but in more recent years increasingly on their syntax and semantics. The first decade of this century also experienced rich comparative work across sign languages. For example, the Sign Language Typology Research Group at the University of Central Lancashire in Preston, United Kingdom, often in cooperation with the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics in Leipzig, Germany, has been and is presently instrumental in multiple projects. These projects range from cataloging and describing endangered and little known sign languages in a browsable corpus to studies of specific topics, such as negative and interrogative constructions, possessive and existen- tial constructions, numeral incorporation, and agreement systems. The Sign Language Typology Research Group has also organized international workshops in which researchers of sign typology can get together and discuss their results.
    [Show full text]
  • A Biographical Sketch of the Rev. Thomas Hopkins Gallaudet, LL. D.
    f\ Bio<£rapt?ieal OF THE REY. Tltomas Hopkins Qallalidet, LI.]). THE FIRST GREAT Fducator of the Deaf IN AMERICA. Prepared on the Occasion of the Maid Centennial Comiratioi, December, 1887, BY HENRY WINTER SYLE, M.A., AUTHOR OF “A RETROSPECT OF THE EDUCATION OF THE DEAF,” ETC., MISSIONARY IN PENNSYLVANIA AND NEIGHBORING DIOCESES, MINISTER OF ALL SOULS’ CHURCH FOR THE DEAF, PHILADELPHIA. WITH NUMEROUS ILLUSTRATIONS ENGRAVED BY WM. R. CULLESTGrWORTH. Philadelphia: WM. R. CULLINGWORTII, 119 South Fourth St, 1887. Copyright, 1887, by Wm. R. Cullingworth. PHILADELPHIA: Evans Printing House—Watson & McManus, . S. W. Cor. Fourth & Library Sts, 1887, 'ftyo/qas l-joplqps <£allaud<?t A saying as true as it is common declares, “ Like father, like son.” As physical peculiarities of stature and form, feature and color, descend from generation to generation, and afford means of easily recognizing relation- ship, so it is beyond question that in- tellectual and moral characteristics are likewise transmitted. The varying circumstances of each generation have more influence upon the development of the mind and the spirit, than upon that of the body, in which latter the possible range of variation is far more limited. A great man may, like Washington, leave no son, or, like Cromwell, one of only ordinary abilities. Still it has been observed in enough cases to establish the law, that strong natural abilities and a tendency to exert them in a certain direction, are as genuine family traits as any physical feature. As the ages of brass and iron recede, and “Happy days Roll onward, leading up the golden year,” the world more readily perceives and more openly confesses its indebtedness to those great men whose capacity, stimulated by zeal and displayed in patient toil, has been exerted, not amid the clash of arms or in the intrigues of statecraft, but in the gentle paths of peace.
    [Show full text]
  • Deaf Culture
    This book was purchased by Purchasing Department ([email protected]) on 2015-12-09 06:03:03 for use by one student. “This book is a real gem! Informative, intriguing, and an easy read -- it is your ticket to a new world of friendships and cultural understanding! When it’s time to step out of the classroom and into the Deaf Community--Michelle Jay’s advice and insights are just what you need! Remember what you learned from this book and you’ll do great!” William G. Vicars, Ed.D. Associate Professor of ASL and Deaf Studies California State University, Sacramento (Also known as “Dr. Bill” of www.lifeprint.com) “Whenever I am questioned to offer a suggestion of a good, easy to read book about sign language and the Deaf community, I now have a clear answer… this book packs a ton of useful information in one spot. A must have for any new sign language student!” John Miller, Co-Founder, Educator www.signingsavvy.com “A Student’s Guide to ASL and the Deaf Community is an essential guide for those thinking of learning ASL, considering a career working within the Deaf community or looking to understand Deaf culture. It truly is the bible for “everything you need to know but didn’t know to ask.” This read.” book is filled with all the important information you need inPearl one Feder place , andL.C.S.W., is truly Editor an amazing& Coordinator SayWhatClub Social Media www.saywhatclub.com immigrants“For anyone tointerested the USA.” in Deaf Culture, I recommend this book as a road map for joining it, fitting in, and finding a related career.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Hopkins Gallaudet (1787-1851): Congregationalist Postmillennialism and ‘Pantomimic Sign Language’
    Lyons, W. J. (2021). Thomas Hopkins Gallaudet (1787-1851): Congregationalist Postmillennialism and ‘Pantomimic Sign Language’. In Critical Dictionary of Apocalyptic and Millenarian Movements Centre for the Critical Study of Apocalyptic and Millenarian Movements. http://www.cdamm.org/articles/thomas-hopkins-gallaudet Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record License (if available): CC BY-NC-ND Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via CDAMM at https://www.cdamm.org/articles/thomas-hopkins-gallaudet . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ Thomas Hopkins Gallaudet, Congregationalist Postmillennialism and ‘Pantomimic Sign Language’ Author: William John Lyons Published: 15th January 2021 William John Lyons. 2021. "Thomas Hopkins Gallaudet, Congregationalist Postmillennialism and ‘Pantomimic Sign Language’." In James Crossley and Alastair Lockhart (eds.) Critical Dictionary of Apocalyptic and Millenarian Movements. 15 January 2021. Retrieved from www.cdamm.org/articles/thomas-hopkins-gallaudet. Introduction Thomas Hopkins Gallaudet is renowned almost solely today as the father of American education for deaf people. Born in 1787, he was brought up in the Congregationalist churches of New England, a denomination dominated by postmillennialist ideas drawn from biblical prophecy and characterised by the belief that the present ‘troubled age’ would soon be replaced by a glorious thousand-year Church-led age—the millennium—before a final short period of human rebellion against God was ended by Christ’s return and a last judgment.
    [Show full text]
  • Communication Controversy in Deaf Education
    Communication Controversy in Deaf Education Presentation by: Irene Tunanidas, M.Ed., M.S. Retired Deaf Educator, Deaf Advocate, Tutor Speech interpreted by: Karen Steed, Librarian Poland Branch Library Painting Credit: Nancy Rourke May 10, 2019 3-26-2019 History of Deaf Education The history of deaf education dates back to ancient Greece where the deaf were harshly oppressed and were denied fundamental rights such as: not permitted to own a property or marry. They were considered a burden to society and were sent to a sanitarium or put to the mountains to die. (Winefield, 1987) Aristotle’s Perspective of Deaf Children Aristotle (384-322 B.C.), ancient Greek philosopher, spent considerable time interacting with deaf children in Greece and determined that those born deaf were incapable of speech and reasoning. His words echoed throughout Europe until the 1500s. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Aristotle Aristotle Definitions of Deafness Hard-of-Hearing – refers to persons who experience a slight to moderate hearing loss. Although some may be able to understand speech, they may be prevented from conversing with those who are soft-spoken, and may be prevented from comprehending messages expressed over the telephone. Deaf – In 1972 the term “Deaf” began appearing in the literature pertaining to deafness. During that time, James Woodward proposed the idea that the word, “deaf” be capitalized when referring to a particular group of people who share a language – American Sign Language (ASL) and a culture. deaf – Audiologists use the term “deaf” to identify individuals who have varying degrees of hearing loss. This medical term means the individual’s hearing needs to be “fixed” through hearing devices https://lhac.com/hearing-loss/ such as: hearing aids or cochlear implants.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Deaf Culture and Sign Language by Carol Padden and Tom Humphries
    Students, I have put together a great amount of information for you to read below. This information will be very useful in learning ASL and knowing the history of the language. As I have explained many times, if you started reading a book at chapter 6, the book will not make much sense to you. For that reason, learning the language history is the beginning of your journey. Please read this information. I recommend you to download and print this information and to use this as a reference on this great journey in such an amazing language! The History of Deaf Culture and Sign Language by Carol Padden and Tom Humphries. American Sign Language, or ASL, is one of the most widely used sign languages in the world. There are an estimated 200- to 300,000 signers of ASL in the United States and Canada and many more who have learned it as a second language. ASL is not universal, meaning that it is not understood by signers of other sign languages around the world. No one knows how many different sign languages there are; a recent survey of all documented human languages lists 130 sign languages, which include Brazilian Sign Language, Japanese Sign Language, Portuguese Sign Language, French Canadian Sign Language, among others. Where spoken languages use the voice and movement of the mouth to communicate, signers use their hands and their face and bodies to convey precise meaning. One handshape is like one consonant; the English words bat, rat, cat all differ only with the first consonant. Likewise, the signs BLACK and SUMMER are almost identical except for a different handshape.
    [Show full text]